* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [1:45 p.m. - Work Session -] [00:00:06] UH, I WILL KICK OFF IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE FOUR PLATS ON TODAY'S AGENDA. OKAY. WE HAVE NONE. UH, WE HAVE, UH, TWO PLAN AMENDMENTS. DOES ANYBODY HAVE A QUESTION ON, UH, ITEM NUMBER FIVE? I APOLOGIZE FOR THE BACKGROUND NOISE. THIS IS THE FUN PART ABOUT BEING BACK IN THE OFFICE. , ANY QUESTIONS ON NUMBER FIVE? WHAT'S THE PROCEDURE FOR DEALING WITH NUMBER FIVE? OH, I'M SORRY. GREAT POINT. UH, COMMISSIONER GARCIA. AND SO, UH, STAFF, IF YOU CAN CLARIFY THE DENIAL, UH, IS THE APPLICANT WILLING TO GO ALONG WITH THE ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION? YES. SO I CAN, UH, GET YOU COUNTS ON THAT REAL QUICK. SO YOUR COUNTS ARE 24 NOTICES. EIGHT IN FAVOR, NONE OPPOSED NO RESPONSE FROM LOS ANGELES HEIGHTS. KEYSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR, AND THERE WERE THREE NOTICES RECEIVED OUTSIDE OF THE 200 FEET, WHICH WERE ALSO IN FAVOR. AND WE HAVE SPOKEN TO THE APPLICANT AND THEY WILL BE FORMALLY ACCEPTING THE AMENDMENT, UM, DURING THE MEETING. SO THIS ITEM WILL BE ON INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. UM, I WILL GIVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION OF IT AGAIN WITH, AND I'LL REITERATE THE COUNTS ONCE AGAIN, AND THEN THE APPLICANT WILL COME ON SO HE CAN MAKE HIS AMENDMENT. THANK YOU. WHAT IS, IS THE AMENDMENT TO, UH, COMMUNITY, UH, INSTEAD OF NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY? CORRECT. SO INSTEAD OF COMMUNITY, COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL MM-HMM. , WHICH WILL ALLOW HIM HIS ZONING THAT HE WANTS. YES, IT DOES. HE WILL BE ABLE TO GO WITH A C ONE CD FOR HIS USE, HIS PROPOSED USE. OKAY. IT'S JUST, IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA, YOU CAN SEE HOW THE AREA IS THE MAJORITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. IT SEEMS MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA AND, UM, LESS INTENSITY. NOW THIS PROPERTY IS IN, UH, IS ALREADY IN A FLOODPLAIN AND SO THERE'S NOT MUCH THEY CAN DO WITH IT. UH, THEY JUST WANNA CONTINUE TO BE ABLE TO USE IT THE WAY THEY'VE BEEN USING IT, WHICH IS THEY'RE DOING SOME STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS THAT THEY HAVE TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY. AND THIS WILL ALLOW THEM TO DO THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU, CHRISTIE. UH, IF YOU DON'T MIND, IF YOU CAN JUST TAKE IT AWAY AND GIVE US THE REST OF THE, UM, THE, THE FEEDBACK ON THE REST OF THE AGENDA, PLEASE. THANK YOU. SURE, SURE. NO PROBLEM. UH, SO ONE OTHER THING I HAVE FOR YOU TODAY IS ITEM NUMBER SIX. UH, THIS IS THE PA THAT ENDS IN TWO SIX. THERE WERE 28 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION, AND NO RESPONSE FROM THE SOUTHTON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THERE IS A VOICEMAIL FOR THIS ITEM. IT CAN, IT IS ELIGIBLE TO REMAIN ON CONSENT. WE WOULD SIMPLY PLAY THAT VOICEMAIL, UH, VOICEMAIL PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT ITEMS. SO IF THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU, WE CAN LEAVE IT THERE. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO PULL IT, WE CAN DO THAT AS WELL. IS IT IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION? THE VOICEMAIL IS IN OPPOSITION. UH, IT IS A DAUGHTER ON BEHALF OF HER, FOR HER PARENTS WHO OPPOSE ANY REZONING OR CHANGE IN THIS AREA. OKAY. WOULD ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS LIKE TO PULL ITEM NUMBER SIX? OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS ON ITEM SIX? OKAY. CHRISTY, IF YOU CAN GO THROUGH THE REST OF THE ITEMS ON, ON NOTICES AND ANY RESPONSES, PLEASE. OKAY. SO I THINK AT THIS POINT I WOULD NEED TO TURN IT OVER TO, IS IT MARCO FROM YES. UH, I'LL BE HANDLING ALL YEAH. TRANSPORTATION NOW, BUT YEAH, I'LL BE HANDLING EVERYTHING FROM SEVEN THROUGH 11. UH, WE ARE PUTTING NUMBER EIGHT AND NINE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. UM, THIS IS A MAJOR THIRD FOR PLAN AMENDMENT FOR, UH, TO AN AREA THAT'S, UH, IN THE SAME AREA. SO WE'RE GONNA BE PRESENTING THOSE ITEMS TOGETHER. UH, NUMBER EIGHT, IT'S A CITY INITIATED AMENDMENT. AND NUMBER NINE IS THE DEVELOPER INITIATED. THE DEVELOPER IS GONNA ASK FOR A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. UH, BUT WE WANNA KEEP THEM BOTH IN THE SAME TIME. SO THE CITY WILL ALSO BE ASKING FOR CONTINUANCE ON, UH, THEIR AMENDMENT. AND FOR THOSE ITEMS, UM, WE HAVE THREE CITIZENS. MARCO? YES. REALLY QUICKLY, WHAT, WHAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THE CONTINUANCE? PURPOSE? UH, TO GET MORE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS. OKAY. [00:05:01] AND WE, FOR THOSE AMENDMENTS, WE HAVE THREE, UH, CITIZENS IN FAVOR. AND THERE'S ONE, ONE PROPERTY IN OPPOSITION, MARCO, THAT'S FOR EIGHT AND NINE. YES. BUT WE'RE GONNA CON DO ASK FOR CONTINUANCE OR BE REQUESTED TO GRANT A CONTINUANCE. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 10, MARKUP. UM, SO 10, UM, NO ONE HAS RESPONDED. WE SENT ABOUT 10 NOTICES. AND JUST LIKE THE OTHER ONE, UH, THIS IS BOTH A CITY INITIATED AND DEVELOPER INITIATED CASE, BUT THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE ITEMS. UM, BUT 10 NOTICES WERE SENT OUT AND THEN WERE RECEIVED BACK. OKAY. AND THEN FOR, UM, SEVEN, UM, SKIP THAT ONE. THAT'S JUST A DEVELOPER INITIATED THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT. UH, WE SENT 14 NOTICES AND THERE WAS ONE PROPERTY OWNER WHO SENT ONE BACK IN OPPOSITION. OKAY. SEVEN HAS TO BE AN INDIVIDUAL, CORRECT. OH, RELATE TO D S C STAFF FOR THAT ONE. I'M NOT SURE IF ANYONE SUBMITTED A VOICEMAIL OR REQUESTED A CALLBACK. YEAH, I THINK THERE WAS A, THERE WAS AN ITEM, I THINK AN EMAIL SENT IN ON THAT ONE. ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, UH, MARCO, DID YOU HAVE AN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN'S A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING RECEIVED FOR THAT ONE? YES. UH, I SUBMITTED IT IT TO KELSEY, UH, FOR THE RECORD WE RECEIVED. OKAY. SO, OKAY. SO IF, IF IT WAS A LETTER SUBMITTED THAT IT CAN REMAIN ON CONSENT, UM, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE PULLED. OKAY. AND COMMISSIONER PECK, WERE YOU HERE FOR THE EIGHT AND NINE WILL BE ON INDIVIDUAL? YES, I HEARD THAT. YEAH. OKAY. THANKS. AND ALL THE MAJOR, THE PLAN AMENDMENTS, UH, WERE APPROVED BY THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS WELL, F Y I. RIGHT. AND, UH, ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THE MAJOR THOROUGH PRAYER PLAN AMENDMENTS? SO ITEMS NUMBER SEVEN THROUGH 11? YEAH, MARCO, QUESTION HERE. THIS IS ZUKI. UH, WE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT, PROPOSED TO DESIGNATION. WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCE OF DESIGNATION AND REALIGNMENT? SO A REALIGNMENT IS BASICALLY SHIFTING THE ADOPTED ALIGNMENTS TO A DIFFERENT DIRECTION. AND A DESTINATION IS ADDING, UM, AN ALIGNMENT TO THE PLAN THAT WASN'T ALREADY THERE ADDING. SO YOU ARE GONNA TAKE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY? YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ADOPTED ALIGNMENT, THAT MEANS THAT'S ALREADY HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BEFORE PREVIOUS ? YES. UH, YES. IT'S, IT'S ADOPTED IN THE PLAN ALREADY. OKAY. AND, AND, AND IN THE, AND THIS IS ALL WITHIN, UH, A FLOOD ZONE. UH, SO, UH, FOR NUMBER, NUMBER EIGHT. NUMBER EIGHT, YEAH. UM, SO THIS IS EXISTING GRAY TOWN, ABBOTT ROAD. UM, IT'S ALREADY, IT'S AN EXISTING ROAD ALREADY IN THE FLOOD ZONE. UH, WE JUST WANT TO REALIGN THE ALIGNMENT TO MATCH WHAT'S THERE. IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, THE BLUE LINE, UH, IT DOESN'T MATCH WHAT'S CURRENTLY EXISTING. SO WE WANT TO, UH, SHIFT IT UP TO MATCH THE EXISTING ROADS. AND WE'RE ADDING AVID ROAD BECAUSE IT'S NOT ON THE PLAN CURRENTLY, BUT WE SEE THAT AS A VITAL CONNECTION IN THE FUTURE, UH, AS NEW DEVELOPMENT COMES ALONG. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR NO FURTHER QUESTION. AND, UH, I'LL LOOK TO COMMISSIONER PECK AND, AND STAFF. IS IT RELEVANT, UM, OR DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO GIVE US, 'CAUSE I KNOW THAT THESE THOROUGH AFFAIRS WERE NOT UNANIMOUS VOTES, UM, WITH ATTACK. IS IT RELEVANT TO GIVE US THOSE VOTES FOR EACH OF THOSE ITEMS? OH, YOU, YOU WANT THE, FOR HOW THEY WERE VOTED ON AT THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE? YES, SIR. MARCO, DO YOU HAVE THAT? IF NO, I DO NOT. UM, OKAY. LET ME SEE IF I CAN GET THAT INFORMATION. IT MIGHT TAKE ME A COUPLE MINUTES TO GO THROUGH THE MINUTES ON THAT ONE THOUGH. OKAY. UH, IN THE MEANTIME, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON OUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENTS ITEMS NUMBER SEVEN THROUGH 11. [00:10:02] DO WE KNOW WHAT THE CONCERNS WERE FROM THE TAC MEMBERS THAT DID NOT VOTE IN SUPPORT OF THE AMENDMENTS? 'CAUSE SOME OF 'EM LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE JUST ADJUSTING BECAUSE OF FLOOD PLAINS OR OTHER THINGS LIKE THAT. RIGHT. I THINK THE, THE BIGGEST ONE WAS, UM, 10 AND 11. UM, THAT'S A VERY DIFFICULT AREA TO BUILD A ROAD. THERE'S, YOU KNOW, FLOODPLAIN THAT'S THE DOCK LINE OCCURRED BY SEX, BUT THERE'S ALSO A MITIGATION, UH, BANK THAT DOESN'T ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS. SO WE, WE HAD TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION TO BASICALLY WEAVE THE GAPS WITHIN THAT CONSERVATION EASEMENT. AND I THINK THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS FROM, UM, TECH ABOUT ROADS AND, UH, ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. BUT, UH, WE JUST AFFIRMED THAT THIS IS A PLAN THAT ALL CONSTRUCTION IN THE FUTURE, IF IT COMES ALONG TO THAT AREA, HAS TO GO THROUGH ANY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND, UH, MEET REGULATIONS. OF COURSE. UH, COMMISSIONER, ER, COMMISSIONER, UH, CARILLO, HAYNES, ANYTHING YOU WANNA ADD SINCE Y'ALL ALSO SERVE ON THET FOR THE OPPOSITION ON ITEMS 10 AND 11? I THINK MARCO SAID IT WELL, BUT JUST IN CASE WE HAVE ADDITIONAL YEAH, YEAH, THAT WAS A GOOD, THAT WAS A GOOD SUMMARY. 10 11, THE WHOLE ISSUE WAS THAT ENVIRONMENTAL EASEMENT THAT SPECIFIES NO ROADS BUILT WITHIN IT. UM, IT WAS, YOU KNOW, THE, THE PROPOSAL ALIGNMENT SHOWS SOME ENCROACHMENT INTO IT. AND THE, THE BASIS OF THAT WAS THAT THERE WOULD BE, UH, UM, NEGOTIATION AND MAYBE SOME SWAPPING OF SOME LAND AT THE TIME THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE WAS ACTUALLY FORMALLY DEFINED. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THEY COULD, THEY COULD SWAP OUT SOME LAND OR, OR, UH, DO SOME MODIFICATIONS AS NECESSARY. KEEP IN MIND THAT, THAT, THAT THAT ALIGNMENT AS SHOWN ON THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS, IS JUST A LINE. AND I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THE REALITY OF IT IS, IS THAT IT'LL BE CLOSE TO THERE, BUT IT'S, THERE'S STILL WIGGLE ROOM BECAUSE OF THE SCALE OF THE MAPS. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER PECK. OKAY. AND SO OUR LAST ITEM, UM, ITEM NUMBER 12, UH, WE HAVE SOME AMENDMENTS AND YES, ATTACK ON. DID REVIEW AND, AND TWEAK SOME OF THE, UH, REVISIONS THAT, UM, ARE PROPOSED FOR THE BYLAWS. UH, COMMISSIONER PECK, UH, I KNOW THAT YOU WERE A BIG PART OF THIS PROCESS. DO YOU MIND KIND OF PROVIDING THAT SUMMARY AS WELL? SO THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU HAVE TO SIGN OFF AND SIGN ON, CLEARLY , UH, YEAH, EXACTLY. I'M PAYING THE PIPER NOW. , I THINK MY COMPUTER'S ACTING UP AGAIN. I BETTER SIGN OFF. UM, SO THE, THE, THE PRINCIPLE OF THIS WAS, UM, WHEN, WHEN WE FIRST LOOKED AT WHAT PAC MEMBERS WERE EXPIRING THIS YEAR, IT APPEARED THAT THERE WAS A, UH, UH, VERY, UH, KIND OF, MOST OF THE TACK LOOKED LIKE IT WAS EXPIRING. AND THE REASON FOR THAT ENDED UP BEING WAS THAT ALL THE BOARDS AND COMMISSION SEATS WERE EXPIRING THIS YEAR. UM, SO IT REALLY WASN'T THAT UNBALANCED, BUT IT BROUGHT UP THE QUESTION OF WHAT HAPPENS IF ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, MORE THAN HALF OR EVEN ALL OF THE ATTACK EXPIRING IN ANY GIVEN YEAR, AND, YOU KNOW, YOU LOSE CONTINUITY IS WHAT HAPPENS. SO, SO THE PURPOSE OF THE, UH, AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS WAS TO CREATE LANGUAGE THAT IF IT DOES BECOME UNBALANCED WITH A NUMBER OF PEOPLE EXPIRING, THERE'S A MECHANISM IN THERE TO EXTEND ONE PERSON FROM EACH CATEGORY FOR AN ADDITIONAL YEAR TO REBALANCE IT OUT. AND THAT WAY WE REMA WE RETAIN THE, UH, CONTINUITY AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT'S HAPPENED OVER THE PAST YEAR OR YEARS ON ATTACK AND JUST TO KEEP INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND, UH, SOME, YOU KNOW, UH, SOME CONTINUITY THERE. UM, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T HAVE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT GONNA HAVE TO EXTEND ANYBODY RIGHT NOW. I THINK, YOU KNOW, WE MAY BE ONE OFF, THERE MAY BE ONE MORE PERSON EXPIRING ONE YEAR THAN THE NEXT, BUT, UM, NOW WE'VE GOT THE LANGUAGE IN THERE TO WHERE, UH, WE CAN REBALANCE OUT THOSE EXPIRATIONS. THANK YOU, SIR. ANY QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER 11? THE CHANGES TO THE BYLAWS? OKAY. UH, FINAL QUESTION. DO WE HAVE ANY RECUSALS TODAY? I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE ANY RECUSALS TODAY. OKAY. MADAM CHAIR, BEFORE WE GET STARTED, CAN IS THE STAFF HAVE AN UPDATE AS TO A PLAN FOR RETURN TO LIVE MEETINGS? DOES THERE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? YEAH, SO I CAN GIVE YOU A BRIEF UPDATE. UH, WE ARE WORKING ON TRYING TO HAVE A HYBRID MEETING SYSTEM SET UP SIMILAR TO WHAT CITY COUNCIL IS DOING, UH, THAT WILL ENABLE SOME MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO BE, UH, ATTENDING THE MEETINGS IN PERSON, PERSON AS WELL AS SOME COMMISSIONERS IN PERSON. UM, WE ARE WORKING ON, UH, IMPLEMENTING, YOU KNOW, THE TECHNOLOGY NEEDED TO HAVE MEETINGS IN THAT FASHION, [00:15:01] AND WE DO HOPE TO HAVE THAT READY TO GO BY AUGUST. OKAY. THANKS. THANKS, LOGAN. GREAT QUESTION. THANK YOU FOR ASKING THAT. OKAY. UH, WELL IT IS 2 0 2 STAFF. WHENEVER WE'RE READY TO GO INTO THE MEETING, UM, PLEASE LEMME KNOW. ALL RIGHT, I THINK WE'RE READY TO START WHENEVER YOU FOLKS ARE. OKAY, THANK YOU. IT [2:00 P.M. - Call to Order] IS APRIL 28TH, 2021 AT 2 0 2. I AM CALLING, UH, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER. IF STAFF CAN PLEASE PLAY THE SPANISH INTERPRETER SERVICES STATEMENT, PLEASE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. STAFF CAN PLEASE CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL. COMMISSIONER JACKSON HERE. COMMISSIONER. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES PRESENT, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA PRESENT, COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, COMMISSIONER GEL PRESENT, COMMISSIONER ZUKI PRESENT, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. PRESENT, COMMISSIONER PROFIT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER ORIAN PRESENT VICE CHAIR PECK PRESENT, AND MADAM CHAIR GONZALEZ PRESENT, A QUORUM IS PRESENT. THANK YOU. IF I CAN NOW, UH, READ OFF THE MEETING FORMAT TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE PUBLIC AND LIMIT THE POTENTIAL SPREAD OF C OVID 19. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS HOLDING MEETINGS VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE. THESE MEETING STANDARDS ARE BASED UPON THE VARIOUS SUSPENDED PROVISIONS OF THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT ISSUED BY THE TEXAS GOVERNOR IN RESPONSE TO THE C OVID 19 CRISIS AND ARE IN PLACE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN WATCH AND LISTEN TO THIS MEETING BY VISITING WWW.SANANTONIO.GOV/DSD OR BY CALLING IN FOR AUDIO ONLY AT 2 1 0 2 0 6 5 4 8 3. TO INCORPORATE PUBLIC COMMENT, THERE ARE FOUR OPPORTUNITIES. THESE INCLUDE EMAIL OR MAIL OF COMMENTS, DROPPING OFF COMMENTS, LEAVING VOICEMAIL, OR ASKING TO BE CALLED DURING THE MEETING. STATEMENTS OR COMMENTS RECEIVED ARE PART OF THE OFFICIAL WRITTEN RECORD FOR ITEMS ON INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT. STAFF WILL PLAY ANY MESSAGES RECEIVED BY VOICEMAIL. LASTLY, FOR THOSE THAT SIGNED UP TO RECEIVE A CALLBACK, WE WILL CALL THEM TO STATE THEIR TWO MINUTE COMMENTS. SPANISH INTERPRETERS ARE ON STANDBY AS NEEDED. THE APPLICANT WILL THEN BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL WITH A TWO MINUTE TIME LIMIT, ALONG WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS COMMISSION QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. THANK YOU. WE HAVE TWO MEETING AGENDAS TODAY, THE COMBINED HEARING, UH, CONSENT ITEMS AND THEN ITEMS, UM, ON THE INDIVIDUAL OR UP FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSENT. UM, ALL ITEMS, INDIVIDUAL HEARING, EXCUSE ME, [Consent Agenda] ALL ITEMS ARE UP FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM NUMBER FIVE, NUMBER EIGHT, AND NUMBER NINE. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION FROM THE COMMISSIONERS FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA? SO MOVED. SECOND. SECOND. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PECK. ROLL CALL PLEASE. SO BEFORE, UH, BEFORE WE TAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE, WE ARE GONNA PLAY A FEW VOICEMAILS OKAY. AND WE'LL PLAY THOSE RIGHT NOW. HI, I'M CALLING IN REGARDING THE CASE NUMBER ENDING IN 0 6 0 2 6. I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF MY IN-LAWS DONALD HEZIE AND DIANA HEZIE. THEIR PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 633-2212. [00:20:05] AND THEIR ADDRESS IS 4 4 8 5 MICKEY ROAD. AGAIN, I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF MY IN-LAWS DONALD AND DIANA HENSEY. AND THEY ARE OBJECTING TO RE TO THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY. UH, THEY OWN FOUR G OR 50 ACRES DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED HERITAGE SOUTH SECTOR PLAN. AND THEIR PROPERTY WILL BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED RUNOFF THAT'S SHOWN ON THE PLAT DATED AUGUST 26TH, 2020, IN THE 86 YEARS THAT MY FATHER-IN-LAW HAS BEEN ALIVE, THERE'S NEVER BEEN A CREEK ON THEIR PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. BUT THIS PROPOSED CHANGE WILL NOT ONLY CREATE A CREEK THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY NON-EXISTENT, IT WILL MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO KEEP A FENCE BETWEEN THEIR PROPERTY AND THE NEIGHBORS, AND IT WILL IMPACT THEIR FARMING ABILITY. THE ONLY PORTION OF CREEK THAT CURRENTLY ENTERS THE PROPERTY IS FURTHER DOWN NEAR THEIR EXISTING TANK, WHICH HAS BEEN THERE FOR YEARS AND HAS BEEN DEALT WITH ACCORDINGLY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. OKAY. UH, IF YOU'RE READY, I CAN TAKE THE ROLL CALL VOTE NOW. WE HAD A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA, A SECOND BY VICE CHAIR PECK FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES? YES. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL? YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI APPROVED COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER PROFIT? YES. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? YES. VICE CHAIR PECK? YES. AND MADAM CHAIR GONZALEZ? YES. MOTION PASSED. OKAY. [5. 21-3180 PLAN AMENDMENT CASE PA-2021-11600017 (Council District 1): A request by Chuck Christian, representative, for Approval of a Resolution to amend the Near Northwest Community Plan, a component of the Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use classification from “Urban Low Density Residential" to "Community Commercial" on Lot 24, Block 78, NCB 2773, located at 1303 West Lullwood Avenue. Staff recommends Denial with an Alternate Recommendation. (Associated Zoning Case Z-2021-10700060) (Justin Malone, Planner, (210) 207-0157, Justin.Malone@sanantonio.gov; Development Services Department)] NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE. AND STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION FOR THIS ITEM? YES MA'AM. THIS IS CHRISTIE FLORES. ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE NEAR NORTHWEST COMMUNITY PLAN FROM URBAN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 1303 WEST LOWELL WOOD AVENUE. THERE WERE 24 NOTICES MAILED EIGHT WERE RECEIVED IN FAVOR. NONE WERE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION. NO RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED FROM LOS ANGELES HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. KEYSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR AND THREE NOTICES WERE RECEIVED OUTSIDE THE 200 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA IN FAVOR. THE APPLICANT SEEKS A PLAN AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF THEIR LIGHT TRUCK REPAIR BUSINESS WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF VEHICLES, TRAILERS, AND EQUIPMENT, WHICH IS LOCATED AT ADJOINING THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AT 1400 WEST HILL RAM STAFF RECOMMENDS A SLIGHTLY LOWER LAND USE INTENSITY OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO BOTH ALIGN THE LAND USE TO THE NORTH AND PROTECT THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES FROM MORE INTENSE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL USES. WITH THIS LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, THE APPLICANT CAN STILL REQUEST C ONE CD FOR THEIR PROPOSED USE. THUS, STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL WITH ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. AND MADAM CHAIR, I DO BELIEVE WE HAVE THE APPLICANT ON THE LINE TO FORMALLY MAKE THAT REQUEST. WOULD THIS, WOULD THE, IS THE APPLICANT ONLINE? YES. HI, UH, CHARLES CHRISTIAN. GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. UH, YES. UM, WE ARE IN FULL AGREEMENT OF, UH, THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. I'LL, UH, GO IN ORDER. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? UM, COMMISSIONER ORIAN? UH, NO QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER ZUKI? NO QUESTION. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA, NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYES, COMMISSIONER, NO QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? NO QUESTIONS. MADAM CHAIR. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL? NO QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? NO QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER PROFIT? NO QUESTIONS MA'AM. CHAIR, COMMISSIONER PECK? NO [00:25:01] QUESTIONS. OKAY. AND I TOO HAVE NO QUESTIONS. UH, SO HEARING NO QUESTIONS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR, UH, THE ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION? COMMISSIONER BUFFET SECOND, I THINK, WAS IT COMMISSIONER CARDILLO HAYNES MADE THE MOTION AND COMMISSIONER PROFIT THE SECOND? YES. OKAY. ROLL CALL PLEASE TO BE, TO BE CLEAR. CAN WE, CAN WE BE CLEAR AND SAY THAT, UH, THE MOTION ON THE TABLE IS TO, UH, APPROVAL OF STAFF'S ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION OF, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL? YEAH, WE, WE, WE CAN TAKE, UH, APPROVAL OF THE MOTION AS AMENDED. OKAY. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, UH, FOR, UH, APPROVAL AS AMENDED. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER CARILLO. HANS? YES. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. COMMISSIONER? YES. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL. COMMISSIONER. YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI? YES. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER PROPHET? YES. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? YES. VICE CHAIR PECK? YES. AND MADAM CHAIR GONZALES? YES. YES. THE MOTION PASSED. OKAY. UH, NOW STAFF, IF YOU CAN CLARIFY, DO WE NEED TO TAKE ITEM EIGHT AND NINE INDIVIDUALLY OR CAN THAT BE COMBINED? I, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT IT BE CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY BECAUSE WE HAVE DIFFERENT APPLICANTS REQUESTING. OKAY. SO WE DO, I BELIEVE WE HAVE A STAFF PRESENTATION FOR ITEM NUMBER EIGHT? YES. WE, OKAY. GREAT. [8. 21-2886 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT: Consideration of a request to amend the Major Thoroughfare Plan, a component of the City of San Antonio Master Plan, by realigning a proposed segment of East & West Connector, a Secondary Arterial Type A requiring 86’ feet of right-of way, between existing Graytown Road and existing Abbott Road, and designating an existing segment of Abbott Road as a Secondary Arterial Type A, requiring 86’ feet right-of-way, between approximately 3,250’ feet north of the existing intersection of Graytown Road & Abbott Road and existing FM 1346. Staff recommends approval. (Marco Hinojosa, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, (210) 207-4087, Marco.Hinojosa@sanantonio.gov, Transportation)] [9. 21-2888 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT: Consideration of a request to amend the Major Thoroughfare Plan, a component of the City of San Antonio Master Plan, by realigning a proposed segment of Graytown Road, a Secondary Arterial Type A requiring 86’ feet of right-of way, between approximately 3,290’ northwest of the existing intersection of Graytown Road and Freudenburg Road and approximately 1,240’ southwest of the existing intersection of Graytown Road and Freudenburg Road; and realigning a proposed segment of East & West Connector, a Secondary Arterial Type A requiring 86’ feet of right-of way, between approximately 4,840’ feet east of existing Schuwirth Road and existing Graytown Road. Staff recommends approval. (Marco Hinojosa, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, (210) 207-4087, Marco.Hinojosa@sanantonio.gov, Transportation)] UH, THANK YOU GUYS. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. MARCO OSA, SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER WITH THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO. UM, ITEM EIGHT AND NINE, WE'RE GONNA BE PRESENTING THOSE TOGETHER. THESE ARE MAJOR, THEREFORE PLAN AMENDMENTS, BUT THEY ARE IN THE SAME AREA. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS THE CITY INITIATED AMENDMENT. AND ITEM NUMBER NINE IS A DEVELOPER INITIATED AMENDMENT. UH, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THE ADOPT ALIGNMENTS THAT WE'RE GONNA BE AMENDING OR LOOKING TO AMEND ARE THE EAST AND WEST CONNECTOR, ABOT ROAD AND GRAY TOWN ROAD. ALL THREE OF THESE ALIGNMENTS ARE SECONDARY ARTERIAL TYPE AS, WHICH REQUIRE A RIGHTWAY DEDICATION OF 86 FEET. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THIS IS THE PROCESS AMENDMENT THAT THE CITY IS LOOKING TO INITIATE. THE BLUE LINE AND THE MAP HERE IS WHAT'S CURRENTLY ADOPTED IN THE MAJOR THIRD FLOOR PLAN. AND WE'RE LOOKING TO REALIGN THE BLUE LINE TO MATCH THE GREEN LINE. UH, WE WANT THIS TO BE BECAUSE WE WANT TO MATCH THE EXISTING GRAY TOWN ROAD, UH, BUT WE ALSO WANT TO DESIGNATE A PORTION OF A ROAD INTO THE MAJOR, THEREFORE PLAN AS WELL, WHICH YOU SEE IN THIS MAP HERE IN PURPLE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A MAP OF THE DEVELOPER INITIATED AMENDMENT. AGAIN, THE BLUE LINE IS CURRENTLY WHAT'S ADOPTED IN THE MAJOR THEREFORE PLAN. AND THE DEVELOPER IS LOOKING TO AMEND TO MATCH WHAT IS IN GREEN, WHICH ALSO MATCHES THE EXISTING GREAT TOWN ROAD. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A MAP OF BOTH THESE AMENDMENTS TOGETHER, AND THIS IS AT THAT REGIONAL SCALE AS WELL, SHOWING EXISTING ROADS AS LONG AS MAJOR CONNECTORS IN THE AREA. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO SOME OF THE FACTORS THAT WERE CONSIDERED FOR THE CITY INITIATIVE AMENDMENTS, UH, LIKE I SAID, THE ALIGNMENTS AS ADOPTED CURRENTLY DON'T MATCH THE EXISTING ROADS. SO THIS AMENDMENTS WOULD MAKE THAT, UH, MORE OF A CLEANUP VERSION THEN WHAT'S ACTUALLY THERE. AND THE POST REALIGNMENT ALSO FOLLOWS EXISTING ROADS AND MAINTAINS THE EXISTING, UH, AB ROAD GREAT TOWN ROAD INTERSECTION. AND THE DESIGNATION OF AN EXISTING SEGMENT OF ABER ROAD IS MEANT TO PROVIDE A BETTER CONNECTION BETWEEN FM 1346 AND FM 50 15 18. UH, CURRENTLY THE APPROXIMATE WIDTH LENGTH OF ABBOT ROAD IS ABOUT 55 FEET AND DESIGNATING ABBOTT ROAD AS A SECONDARY TRIPLE TYPE A. AND THE PLAN WILL REQUIRE ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE EXISTING ABBOTT ROAD TO DEDICATE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM 86 FEET BECAUSE THE ROAD IS ALREADY EXISTING ITSELF. AND THE INCREASE RIGHT OF WAY WITH FOR ABBOTT ROAD WILL ALLOW FOR FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS SIDEWALKS, BIKE FACILITIES, AND TRANSIT LANES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THESE SORT OF FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPER INITIATED, UH, JUST LIKE THE ONE BEFORE THE ALIGNMENTS HAS ADOPTED, DO NOT FOLLOW THE EXISTING GREAT TOWN ROAD. SO THIS AMENDMENT WILL CLEAN THAT PORTION UP. UM, AS LY SHOWN, THE ADOPT ALIGNMENTS SET UP A POSSIBLY DANGEROUS ROADWAY RATING NETWORKS THE WAY THAT THEY'RE DRAWN. AND THEY DID CREATE SOME UNSAFE INTERSECTIONS THAT WILL BE, UH, UNPLEASANT IF THEY WORKS BE CONSTRUCTED AS WHAT'S MATCHING THE PLAN RIGHT NOW. AND THE CURRENT ADOPT [00:30:01] ALIGNMENT BISECTS A NEWLY DEVELOPED SANITARY ATORY PROPERTY AND THE POST REALIGNMENT WILL AVOID THIS POTENTIAL CONFLICT IN THE FUTURE. AND THE ADOPT ALIGNMENTS ALSO DIVIDE MANY PARCELS INTO IRREGULAR SHAPES. SO THE POST REALIGNMENT WILL LEVERAGE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY AND PROVIDE FOR THE MOST USE BY THE MOST PARCELS WITH FEWER DIVISIONS LEAVING UNUSABLE LAND COMPONENTS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. WE HAD A VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETING, UH, ALL NOTICE SIX SENT TO PROPERTY OWNERS, 200 FEET OF THE ADOPTED ALIGNMENT AND THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT, 85 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED. UH, WE HAD 30, ABOUT 30 CITIZENS OF ATTENDANCE FOR THIS HEARING AND WITH FORMAL, UH, RESPONSES, WE HAD THREE PROPERTY OWNERS IN SUPPORT AND ONE IN OPPOSITION. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WE ALSO TOOK THIS, UH, THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE M C P COMMITTEE, WHICH IS A GROUP OF STAKEHOLDERS, UH, FOR DIFFERENT AGENCIES THAT REVIEW, UH, AGENT THERE FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS AND PROVIDE COMMENTS. UH, LIKE I SAID, WE DID HAVE A PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING ON APRIL 15TH, AND WE TOOK THE SUPPLY COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE 12TH WHERE THEY RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR BOTH AMENDMENTS. AND OF COURSE, RIGHT NOW WE'RE HERE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ON APRIL 28TH. AND THESE ITEMS ARE TENDERLY SCHEDULED FOR CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 20TH. UH, BUT, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL BE, UH, REQUESTING CONTINUANCE AND THE CITY WILL AS WELL. SO THAT, THAT MIGHT PUSH THAT DATE A LITTLE FURTHER OUT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. UH, FINALLY, TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS AS PRESENTED. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THAT STAFFS PRESENTATION. UH, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND LIKE I SAID, THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE. UH, IF, IF I MAY, UH, MADAM CHAIR, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND PLAY THE TWO VOICEMAILS WE, UH, RECEIVED FOR THIS ITEM AS WELL. YES, PLEASE. THANK YOU. YEAH. MY NAME IS DOUGLAS HEDRICK, THE OWNER OF PROPERTY 2 6 1 NORTHRIDGE ROAD, WHICH AFFECTS THE MAJOR THROUGH FAIR, UH, PLAN TO GO THROUGH. UH, I WOULD LIKE TO THAT POSTPONED AT A LATER DATE. I'LL HAVE TIME TO RESEARCH IT. UM, I WAS NOT NOTIFIED UNTIL LAST WEEK, NOT BY THE CITY OR BY THE DEVELOPER. SO IF YOU COULD POSTPONE, GET, HELLO, MY NAME IS MARK HENDRICKS. UH, MY ADDRESS IS 2 6 6 1 NORTH GRAY COUNTY ROAD, CONVERSE, TEXAS SEVEN EIGHT ONE ZERO NINE. UH, MY PHONE NUMBER'S (210) 787-7130. I'M CALLING IN REFERENCE TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, UH, COMPONENT BRIDGE ROUND ROAD. IT LOOKS LIKE. UM, IT'S A CITY PROPOSED AMENDMENT, UH, REALIGNMENT OF A PROPOSED SEGMENT OF THE EAST AND WEST CONNECTOR AND SECONDARY ARTERIAL , UH, AND SO FORTH. UH, ANYWAY, UH, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. UH, REASON BEING MAINLY IS BECAUSE I JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT IT. I DIDN'T HAVE PROPER NOTIFICATION FROM THE CITY. I WAS NOT, UH, INFORMED BY THE DEVELOPER. B E K, UH, WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE TIME TO DISCUSS ALL THIS, UH, UH, WORK, UH, WITH THE DEVELOPER AND, UH, AND DID MY DUE DILIGENCE TO SEE, UH, WHAT IMPACT IT WOULD HAVE. I'M NOT IN THE PROPERTY BUT THE COMMUNITY AS WELL. UH, SO THAT'S MY VOTE. UH, I NEED A, A CONTINUANCE AT LEAST, UH, HOPEFULLY 45 TO 60 DAYS, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. UH, THERE IS A CONTRACT ON THE PROPERTY. I'M, IT'S A DEVELOPER AS WELL, AND I WAS HOPING THAT, UH, LET THEM TWO WORK OUT THE DETAILS. BUT, UH, BUT AGAIN, UM, I'M VOTING FOR CONTINUANCE. THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR. OKAY. AND, AND WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT ON THE LINE. ASHLEY, ARE YOU THERE? YOU MAY HAVE TO HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE YOURSELF. ASHLEY, IF YOU CAN HEAR US, TROY HITTING STAR SIX, [00:35:14] UH, IF I MAY RECOMMEND SURE. PERHAPS WE COULD TAKE UP A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. UH, SURE. THE TIME TO TRY TO GET THIS CONNECTION RESOLVED. AND TO, TO CLARIFY, UM, THIS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE, ARE THEY REQUESTING TWO WEEKS OR A MONTH? UH, THE APPLICANT EMAILED ME SAYING THAT WE'RE GONNA REQUEST A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE AND WE WOULD LIKE THE CITY ONE TO MATCH THAT ONE AS WELL. WELL, OKAY. SO FOR ITEM, UH, NUMBER EIGHT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION, UH, TO APPROVE A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE QUESTION, WHAT DID THE TWO WEEKS CONTINUANCE MEANS? MORE TIME TO STUDY? YES. AND THEY, THEY CLARIFIED THEY WANTED THE TWO WEEKS TO BE ABLE TO, UH, REACH OUT TO, UH, THE COMMUNITY. UH, WHAT WAS THE WAY YOU REACHED OUT TO THE COMMUNITY, MARCO, FOR THAT AMENDMENT? SO WE USE, UH, BCA ADDRESS DATA TO SEND OUT, UH, ACTUAL PHYSICAL NOTICES TO THESE, UH, PROPERTY OWNERS. OKAY. ALRIGHT. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, I MOVE FOR A CONTINUANCE. SECOND. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL MOVES FOR A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. SECOND. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? THAT WAS CHRIS GARCIA. OH, I'M SORRY. COMMISSIONER CHRIS GARCIA MADE THE, UH, SECOND. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. ROLL CALL PLEASE. OKAY. FOR A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, COMMISSIONER JACKSON. COMMISSIONER CARILLO HANE. YES. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL? YES. C COMMISSIONER ZUKI APPROVED COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES. GARCIA COMMISSIONER. PROFIT COMMISSIONER? YES. COMMISSIONER. COMMISSIONER. ORIAN COMMISSIONER OR YES. VICE CHAIR PECK? YES. AND MADAM CHAIR GONZALEZ E? YES. GONZALEZ. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER NINE? THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OR CONTINUE, I'M SORRY. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. UH, CHAIR. DON'T WE, I THOUGHT THERE WAS GONNA BE A PRESENTATION ON NINE SEPARATE. I DO BELIEVE WE, WE WENT AHEAD AND RE PATCHED THE APPLICANT THROUGH, UH, ASHLEY, ARE YOU THERE? OKAY. UH, AND COMMISSIONER ORIAN AND THE, THE STAFF I THINK MENTIONED THAT IT WAS A, A COMBINED PRESENTATION, BUT YES, WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT. OKAY, BECAUSE I HAD QUESTIONS ON ITEM NINE, THAT'S WHY I WAS BRINGING IT UP. ASHLEY, DO WE HAVE YOU ON THE LINE? OKAY. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? UH, YES. THANK YOU. UM, SO FOR ITEM NUMBER NINE, UH, I, I WAS CONTACTED BY ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. I HAD A GOOD 45 MINUTE PHONE CONVERSATION WITH HIM, UH, PRIOR, UH, TO THE MEETING. AND THE CONCERN WAS NOT WHAT WAS GOING ON ON GRAY TOWN OR WHAT WAS GOING ON THROUGH THE DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY. UH, BUT THE CONCERN WAS HOW IT WAS CUTTING THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY. SO WHERE THE PROPOSED, UH, REALIGNMENT, UH, ON TERMINATES DOWN ON THE WEST SIDE OF GRAY TOWN, UH, THE, THE LANDOWNER THAT IT IS NOW CUTTING UP. SO INSTEAD OF US CUTTING THROUGH 45 DEGREES THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY, IT'S, IT'S, UH, GONNA BE FOLLOWING THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE. THEY WERE REQUESTING THAT IT WOULD RUN CENTER LINE ON THE SIDE, ON THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE, THE WEST SIDE PROPERTY LINE, AND JUST RUN STRAIGHT DOWN AND TIE IN. UH, THAT WAY IT WOULDN'T BE A COMPLETE BURDEN TO THEM. THEY WERE, THEIR PROP, THIS IS THEIR, UH, RETIREMENT PLAN FOR HIM AND HIS WIFE AND HE HAVING IT ALL RUN ENTIRELY THROUGH HIS PROPERTY. HE DIDN'T FEEL LIKE THAT WAS, UH, FAIR AND HE WAS REQUESTING IT, UH, THE PROPOSED REQUEST HE MODIFIED SO THE LINE WOULD RUN ON THE WEST SIDE AND RUN STRAIGHT THROUGH AND CONNECT THAT. YEAH, I CAN COMMENT ON THAT. UM, D S D DO YOU GUYS MIND SHOWING THE DEVELOPER INITIATE A MAP JUST BY ITSELF? CAN YOU ALSO SHOW WHAT, WHAT PROPERTY COMMISSIONER ORIEN IS REFERENCING ON THAT MAP OR WHERE? RIGHT. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY, UH, MR. DAVID STEELE. UH, I'M SURE THAT WAS ONE WHO CALLED YOU, UH, COMMISSIONER. HE WAS. SO THE PROPERTY IS, UH, WHERE THE GREEN AND BLUE LIGHT KIND OF SPLIT OFF, UM, TO THE VERY NORTH, IF YOU GUYS CAN PUT RIGHT THERE. MORE UP, MORE UP. [00:40:01] RIGHT, RIGHT THERE. RIGHT THERE. SO THAT'S HIS PROPERTY. SO THE REASON WHY, UM, WE WEREN'T ABLE TO PUSH IT TO, OR STAFF WASN'T ABLE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR PUSHING IT TO THE WESTERN BOUNDARY IS BECAUSE THE PROPERTY RIGHT TO THE WEST OF IT, UM, THEY SUBMITTED A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THEY ARE HONORING THE MT P AS IT CURRENTLY SHOWN THERE. SO THE M MC, THE PATIENT MT. P M D P MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN, UH, HAS THE ALIGNMENT DIAGONALLY GOING THROUGH THEIR M D P. SO THAT'S WHY WE COULDN'T, UH, MOVE IT TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES BECAUSE THAT WOULD CREATE A SHARP ANGLE. AND WITH THESE TYPES OF ROADS IN U D C, THERE HAS TO BE CERTAIN TYPE OF RADIUS THAT MUST BE MET. AND THAT IS, AND THAT'S, I I CAN'T SEE ANY ON MY SCREEN. I'M STILL SHOWING. UH, OKAY, HERE WE GO. I SEE IT NOW. SO CAN YOU POINT WHERE IS, WHERE IS THIS CONFLICT WITH THE M V P? IS THAT NEAR THE FLOODPLAIN NOW IN THE SOUTH, OR WHERE IS IT? YEAH, SO YEAH, SO THAT'S WHERE D S D HAS THIRD CURSE RIGHT NOW. THAT'S THE, UH, MR. DAVID SEAL'S PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY RIGHT TO THE WEST OF IT. IF Y'ALL, IF YOU GUYS CAN POINT THERE. UH, SO THAT BIG PROPERTY, THEY SUBMITTED A MASTER DEV DEVELOPMENT PLAN. UH, THAT'S HONORING THE M T P AS IT IS. OKAY. THAT, THAT IS THE, UM, AGAIN, MY SCREEN'S FOR SOME REASON TAKING VERY LONG TO UPDATE. I DON'T SEE THE CURSOR MOVING. BUT THIS IS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PROPERTY ABOVE TO THE WEST ON THE, ON THE CENTRALLY LOCATE. YEAH. RIGHT. OKAY. I CAN SEE THAT. SO THAT RIGHT POINT OF OKAY. AND, AND THAT M V P HAS NOT BEEN, UM, IS IT THROUGH THE REVIEW REVIEW PROCESS ALREADY? IT'S BEEN APPROVED. IT WAS APPROVED IN 2020. RIGHT. OKAY. NO, THAT, THAT, THAT EXPLAINS A LOT. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR CLARIFYING. WE, WE HAVE ALSO PATCHED ASHLEY THROUGH USING A DIFFERENT NUMBER. ASHLEY, CAN YOU HEAR US NOW, LOGAN? YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU. OH MY GOSH. HI EVERYONE. UM, SORRY, IT'S, I CAN HEAR, COULD HEAR YOU, BUT YOU COULDN'T HEAR ME. I APOLOGIZE. UH, THIS IS ASHLEY FAIRMONT WITH KA GRIFFIN AND FAIRMONT. UM, AND, AND AS MARCO MENTIONED IN HIS PRESENTATION, UM, I, I REPRESENT IN WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER, ALONG WITH THEIR CIVIL ENGINEER AND THEIR TRAFFIC ENGINEER, UM, ON THIS REQUEST. AND AS YOU'VE HEARD FROM SOME OF THE VOICEMAILS TODAY, I THINK THERE'S STILL SOME OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. UM, AND, AND WE'D LIKE TO TAKE TWO WEEKS TO TRY TO ADDRESS THOSE IF POSSIBLE. I, I, I DON'T KNOW, YOU KNOW, IF WE CAN ADDRESS ALL CONCERNS, BUT CERTAINLY ANSWER QUESTIONS AND, AND DO OUR BEST. SO, UM, WITH THAT SAID, SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS ITEM, WE'D LIKE TO REQUEST THE TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. THANK YOU. ASHLEY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, UH, TO APPROVE A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. MOTION CHAIR. PECK, I'LL, UH, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM. SECOND MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER PECK. A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PROFITS. IS THAT RIGHT? SECOND. OKAY. MOTION FOR TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES. COMMISSIONER? YES. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. YES. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL SIEGEL? YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI APPROVED COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. MICHAEL GARCIA. YES. C COMMISSIONER. PROPHET COMMISSIONER. PROPHET C. COMMISSIONER ORIAN. COMMISSIONER ORIAN. C. VICE CHAIR. PECK. YES. PRESIDENT MADAM CHAIR GONZALEZ. YES. PRESIDENT. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. FINAL ITEM. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. DO I [13. 21-2413 Consideration and Action on the Minutes from April 14, 2021.] HEAR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES? MOTION TO MOVE. SECOND. COMMISSIONER PROFIT MADE THE MOTION. COMMISSIONER, WHO MADE THE SECOND? GARCIA? MIKE. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. YEAH. ROLL CALL PLEASE. GARCIA. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON. COMMISSIONER JACKSON. C COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES CARILLO. HANS. YES. C COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA. YES. C THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL. COMMISSIONER. YEAH. C COMMISSIONER DKI. COMMISSIONER APPROVED APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA. C. YES. COMMISSIONER PROPHET. YES. COMMISSIONER PROPHET C. COMMISSIONER [00:45:01] ORIAN. COMMISSIONER ORIAN C. VICE CHAIR PECK? YES. AND MADAM CHAIR GONZALEZ? YES. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS? NO STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS TODAY. OKAY. WELL IT IS, UH, 2 32. I ADJOURN THE MEETING. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.