[00:00:03]
WE'RE GONNA CALL THE OCTOBER 13TH, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER.
UH, CAN WE HAVE THE, UH, SPANISH INTERPRETER PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON.
CAN STAFF PLEASE DO THE ROLL CALL? UM, COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES HERE.
UH, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA PRESENT.
PRESENT, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.
UM, COMMISSIONER BUSTAMANTE PRESENT? COMMISSIONER ORIAN.
HERE, COUNCILMAN COURAGE AND VICE CHAIR PECK.
NEXT, ON THE AGENDA, WE HAVE CITIZENS TO BE HEARD.
IF YOU SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, YOU CAN CHOOSE TO SPEAK NOW OR WAIT FOR YOUR INDIVIDUAL ITEM TO BE BROUGHT UP FOR HEARING AND SPEAK.
AT THAT TIME, REMEMBER TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
ANYBODY WANNA SPEAK BEFORE THEIR ITEM IS HEARD? OKAY.
SEEING NONE TODAY, WE HAVE TWO AGENDAS.
OUR FIRST AGENDA IS THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.
CASES THAT ARE ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA ARE CASES WHERE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER DETAILED DISCUSSION AND FILING KNOWN IN THE AUDIENCE ASSIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM.
ALL CASES WILL BE READ INTO THE RECORD IN ONE UNIFIED MOTION.
IF SOMEONE HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, THE ITEM WILL BE MOVED TO THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.
THE SECOND AGENDA IS THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA CASES ON THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA WILL BE DISCUSSED SEPARATELY PRIOR TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAKING A MOTION ON THE ITEM.
[Consent Agenda]
THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.SO AS IT STANDS NOW, WE HAVE ITEM NUMBER 5, 19 24, 25, AND 27 ON THE, UH, INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.
THE REST OF THE, OF THE, UH, THE REST OF THE AGENDA IS ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA? DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WANT TO PULL AN ITEM ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA? ALL RIGHT.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA IS CLOSED.
I BELIEVE THERE IS A PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ITEM NUMBER 21, WHICH IS ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.
DO YOU STILL WISH TO SPEAK ON THAT, THAT ITEM? YEAH.
I'M PRESIDENT OF OAKLAND OAKLAND ESTATES, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, MA'AM? YES.
I RESIDE AT 5 6 5 5 LOCK HILL ROAD.
I JUST WANTED TO SAY THIS WAS, WAS AN OVERSIGHT.
ESSENTIALLY, WHEN WE DID OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN BACK IN 2007, THIS IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE COMMERCIAL NODE WE HAD SET UP.
IT'S ALSO RIGHT NEXT TO AN OH ONE THAT HAD BEEN, UH, DONE UP JUST BEFORE OUR PLAN WAS PUT IN INTO EFFECT.
SO THIS IS, UH, OBVIOUSLY A COMMERCIAL USE.
IT ONLY BACKS UP TO AN RE UH, IN ITS BACK FENCE LINE.
THEY HAVE AGREED ON BUFFERS AND, AND SO WE'RE SETTING UP COVENANTS.
SO IT'S PRETTY, IT'S, WE'RE VERY MUCH IN APPROVAL OF IT.
HE'S GONNA DO, DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR HIS COMMUNITY, SO THANK YOU.
AND I BELIEVE WE WERE GONNA READ ITEM NUMBER 22 INTO THE RECORD BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.
ITEM NUMBER 22 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE NORTHEAST INTER LOOP PLAN FROM PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL TO THE AMENDED REQUEST OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 2 91 EMPORIA BOULEVARD.
THERE WERE 18 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR.
ONE RECEIVED A POST NO RESPONSE FROM TERRELL HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, MR. CHAIR.
THAT IS IT FOR THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.
UM, AT THIS POINT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION UNLESS THERE'S OTHER COMMENTS.
MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA, A MOTION FOR SECOND APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER, PROFIT STAFF.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
[00:05:01]
COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.UH, COMMISSIONER, UH, VICE CHAIR PECK? YES.
WE'LL NOW BEGIN THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.
I'M GONNA TURN THE MEETING OVER TO COMMISSIONER PROFIT.
I HAVE TO RECUSE FROM THIS ITEM.
IT IS TWO 18 AND I'M LEAVING THE ROOM.
IT IS TWO 18 AND, UH, VICE CHAIR PECK HAS LEFT THE ROOM.
UH, ON INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE.
[5. 2011800348: Request by Chesley I. Swann III, Milestone Grosenbacher Development, Ltd., for approval to subdivide a tract of land to establish Olson Subdivision Unit 9, generally located northeast of the intersection of Highway 90 and Grosenbacher Road. Staff recommends Approval. (Nicole Salinas, Senior Planner, 2102078264, Nicole.Salinas@sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department)]
IS THERE ANY COMMISSION OR DISCUSSION RELATED TO THIS MATTER? HEARING NONE.I, UH, ENTERTAIN A MOTION, MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS PULLED FOR PURPOSES OF RECUSAL.
SECOND MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES.
UH, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.
UM, MOTION PASSES FOR APPROVAL.
IT IS TWO 19 AND I'M GOING TO RETURN THE MEETING TO VICE CHAIR PECK.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER PROPHET.
[19. PLAN AMENDMENT PA202111600013 (Council District 4): A request by Paul Salomon and Reyna Castillo, property owners, for Approval of a Resolution amending the Kelly/South San P.U.E.B.L.O Community Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use classification from “Neighborhood Commercial” to “Community Commercial” on the 0.2577 acres out of NCB 8758, located at 819 New Laredo Highway. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z202110700034) (Richard BautistaVazquez, Planner, (210) 2070215, richard.bautistavazquez@ sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department)]
MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 19.ITEM NUMBER 19 IS A REQUEST FOR AN APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE HERITAGE SOUTH SECTOR PLAN FROM COUNTRY TIER TO RURAL ESTATE TIER, LOCATED AT 19 7 7 9 PLEASANTON ROAD.
THERE WERE EIGHT NOTICES MAILED.
THREE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION, AND THERE'S NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER THE 27TH.
THEY CANNOT BE IN ATTENDANCE TODAY.
THERE'S NOBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, SO THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING.
AND, UH, AT THIS POINT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 27TH.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.
OCTOBER 27TH BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT.
A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL.
STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL VOTE.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
[24. PLAN AMENDMENT PA202111600090 (Council District 1): A request by Robert Delgado, applicant, for Approval of a Resolution amending the Midtown Neighborhood Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use classification from “LowDensity Residential" to "Medium Density Residential" on the West 100 feet of Lot 25 and South 56.7 feet of Lot 26, NCB 6521, located at 1023 Aganier Avenue. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z202110700247) (Richard BautistaVazquez, Planner, (210) 2070215, richard.bautistavazquez@ sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department)]
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 24.ITEM NUMBER 24 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION.
AMEND THE MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, UM, FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, LOCATED AT 1 0 2 3 AGNE AVENUE.
THERE WERE 23 NOTICES SENT OUT.
UM, ZERO AND FAVOR, FIVE IN OPPOSITION.
AND BEACON HILL IS IN OPPOSITION.
SEE, THE PROPOSAL IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE SAN ANTONIO TOMORROW COMPREHENSION PLAN, NOR IS THE PROPOSAL CONSISTENT WITH THE MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.
THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN EXPRESSES A CLEAR DESIRE THAT THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES BE PRESERVED AND THAT THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES BE LOCATED ON THE INIAL THOROUGH AFFAIRS AND OR OTHER MAJOR STREETS.
AGNER AVENUE IS A LOCAL STREET WHILE NEARBY.
BLANCO ROAD IS A SECONDARY, SECONDARY ARTERIAL, ALONG WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PRESCRIBES MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE.
UH, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS, AND THE APPLICANT, ROBERT NADO IS PRESENT.
IS THE APPLICANT LIKE TO APPROACH THE PODIUM? WHAT'D HE GO? OKAY.
WELL, UM, WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE SIGNED
[00:10:01]
UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.THIS, UH, PROPOSAL BE WOULD BE DIRECTLY BEHIND MY BACK FENCE.
UH, I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE TRAFFIC AND THE INCREASED POPULATION IN THAT AREA.
UH, IT'S, UH, IT WOULD BE, UH, UH, I GUESS THAT'S ALL I'VE GOT TO SAY, BUT I DO NOT APPROVE OF IT.
NEXT UP WE HAVE MARK SPIELMAN NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
I LIVE AT 900 WEST WOODLAWN AVENUE AND I'M CO-CHAIRMAN OF, UH, BEACON HILLS, UH, ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE.
UH, I'M HERE JUST TO READ A LETTER INTO THE RECORD FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
UH, IF I CAN GET THIS IN AND I'LL READ THE COPY.
UH, DEAR COMMISSIONERS BEACON HILL AREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
FIRST MET WITH THE APPLICANT'S BROKER AT THE APRIL MEETING OF OUR ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE.
HE ADVISED THE COMMITTEE THAT HIS CLIENT, UH, RECENTLY PURCHASED 10 17 AND 10 23 AGONE AND WAS LOOKING TO UP ZONE FROM, UH, THE, THE 10 30, THE 10 23 PROPERTY FROM R SIX TO MF 33.
HOWEVER, THEIR QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF ANOTHER ASPECT OF THE PROJECT, WHICH DISTRACTED FROM THE DISCUSSION OF THE ZONING REQUEST.
AND WE ASKED THE APPLICANT TO CLARIFY THIS, UH, ISSUE WITH THE CITY AND COME BACK TO US.
UNFORTUNATELY, THEY FILED, UH, A PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING REQUEST WITHOUT RETURNING FOR A SECOND DISCUSSION.
WE WERE CAUGHT OFF GUARD AND LEFT WITHOUT TIME TO MAKE THE REQUEST TO OUR GENERAL MEMBERSHIP FOR A VOTE.
UH, WE HAVE REQUESTED THAT THEY POSTPONE AND THEY HAVE INDICATED THEY THEY WOULD DO SO.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME, WE ARE HERE TO EXPRESS OUR OPPOSITION TO THE CURRENT REQUEST IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT AND FAIR WITH THE RESIDENTS THAT, UH, WORKED ON OUR, UH, LAND USE PLAN.
UH, THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE ADHERED TO THE PLAN AND THOSE THAT, UH, COME TO US WITH VARIOUS ZONING REQUESTS.
WE USE OUR MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AS OUR GUIDING DOCUMENT.
THE PLAN HAS THIS BLOCK OF AGONY DESIGNATED FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS DEFINED IN OUR MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD.
PLAN IS TO ALLOW FOR ONE TO TWO UNITS.
THE REQUEST TO THE, UH, AMEND THE PLAN TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR MF 18 ZONING IS CONTRARY TO OUR PLAN IN TWO WAYS.
ONE, IT ALLOWS FOR HIGHER DENSITY IN THE MIDDLE OF A, A SINGLE FAMILY BLOCK, WHICH, UH, WE HAVE PLANNED OUR DENSITY COR UH, WE HAVE PLANNED FOR OUR DENSITY IN THE QUARTERS CORNERS AND SPECIFIC BLOCKS.
THIS LEADS TO UNPLANNED SPOT ZONING.
SECONDLY, EVEN MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IS DEFINED IN THE MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD.
PLAN ONLY SUPPORTS TWO, UH, FOUR TO FIVE UNITS AND MF 18 ZONING ON A HALF ACRE LOT WOULD ALLOW FOR, UH, NINE UNITS.
THE LAND USE AND ZONING MATRIX IN OUR PLAN SHOWS RECOMMENDED ZONING DISTRICTS FOR MEDIUM DENSITY TO RESIDENTIAL AS R SIX THROUGH R THREE THROUGH R SIX, AND RMM FOUR THROUGH RMM SIX.
THERE IS NO, UH, MF ZONING RECOMMENDED FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
THERE'S NO ONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, SO WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BEGIN COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
WE'LL START OVER HERE ON MY LEFT.
IF I MAY INTERJECT FOR ONE MOMENT.
WE FEEL LIKE SOMETHING MAY HAVE HAPPENED AND THEY MIGHT HAVE HAD TO HAVE GONE, OR MAYBE THEY THOUGHT THEY WERE DONE.
UM, SO STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND A CONTINUANCE ON THIS ITEM TO OCTOBER THE 27TH OR NOVEMBER THE 10TH.
UM, YOU HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO CONTACT THE APPLICANT TO FIND OUT IF, OKAY.
WELL, UM, I GUESS WE CAN ENTERTAIN COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE MOTION TO CONTINUE TO NOVEMBER 10TH, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER PROFIT FOR CONTINUANCE TO NOVEMBER 10TH, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
[00:15:02]
STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL VOTE CHAIR.UH, WE HAVE AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA TO POTENTIALLY RESCHEDULE THE NOVEMBER 10TH HEARING DATE.
SHOULD WE, UH, MAYBE NOT PICK THAT DATE? YEAH.
SHALL SHALL WE MOTION TO, UH, CONTINUE TO THE NOVEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION DATE? LET'S JUST DO THE OCTOBER 27TH.
SO, REAM UH, REMIN MY, UH, MOTION TO CONTINUE TO THE OCTOBER 27TH COMMISSION MEETING.
WE CAN AMEND THE MOTION, RIGHT? WE HAVEN'T VOTED ON IT.
WE NOW HAVE, UH, WE RESCINDED THE NOVEMBER 10TH MOTION AND NOW WE'RE, UH, MOTION ON THE FLOOR FOR CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 27TH.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL VOTE.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
UH, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
[25. PLAN AMENDMENT PA202111600091 (Council District 10): A request by Killen, Griffin, and Farrimond, PLLC, applicant, for Approval of a Resolution to the North Sector Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use classification from “Suburban Tier" to "Specialized Center" on Lot TRD and Lot TRE, NCB 16584, located at 17097 Nacogdoches Road. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z202110700260) (Summer McCann, Planner, (210) 2075876, summer.mccann@sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department) South 56.7 feet of Lot 26, NCB 6521, located at 1023 Aganier Avenue. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z202110700247) (Richard BautistaVazquez, Planner, (210) 2070215, richard.bautistavazquez@ sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department) 25. PLAN AMENDMENT PA202111600091 (Council District 10): A request by Killen, Griffin, and Farrimond, PLLC, applicant, for Approval of a Resolution to the North Sector Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use classification from “Suburban Tier" to "Specialized Center" on Lot TRD and Lot TRE, NCB 16584, located at 17097 Nacogdoches Road. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z202110700260) (Summer McCann, Planner, (210) 2075876, summer.mccann@sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department)]
ON TO ITEM NUMBER 25.UM, ITEM NUMBER 25 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN FROM SUBURBAN TIER TO SPECIALIZED CENTER, LOCATED AT 17 0 9 7 NACODOCHES ROAD.
THERE WERE 10 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION.
THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE ROLLING MEADOWS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
IT'S A SPECIALIZED CENTER TO REZONE TO L LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
THE PROPOSED SPECIALIZED CENTER IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND AND ZONING.
THE AREA IS PRIMARILY SUBURBAN TIER.
ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE, WHICH CAN BE REZONED TO C TWO CD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR WAREHOUSE, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE.
THE PROPOSED SPECIALIZED CENTER IS OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE AREA AND TWO INTENTS IN NATURE.
STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND APPLICANT EMILY WESLER IS PRESENT.
EMILY WEISLER WITH KILL GRIFFIN AND FERMAN 100 NORTHEAST LOOP FOUR 10, SUITE SIX 50.
UH, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, IF WE COULD GO AHEAD AND START ON TWO PLEASE.
AS STAFF MENTIONED, THIS PROPERTY, UM, IS LOCATED IN THE 17,000 BLOCK OF NACODOCHES WEST OF 1604.
UM, THIS PROPERTY IS JUST OVER 25 ACRES, SO WHILE IT IS NARROW, IT IS A VERY LARGE PIECE OF PROPERTY.
UM, LOOKS A LITTLE BIT SMALLER ON THIS SCREEN, BUT IT IS A FULL OVER 25 ACRES.
THIS LARGER AERIAL SHOWS THE, UH, EXISTING LAND USES DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ON THIS WEST SIDE OF NACODOCHES, UH, WHICH IS HISTORICALLY AND, UM, VERY OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT THAN THE EAST SIDE OF NACODOCHES.
UM, WE STARTED THE 1604 INTERSECTION, UM, WITH HEAVY INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES.
WHAT IS LEFT OF ROLLING OAKS MALL, UM, WHICH AMAZON HAS TAKEN OVER A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF AND USING AS A DISTRIBUTION FACILITY.
UM, AND THEN THERE IS A LARGE SELF-STORAGE UNIT FACILITY, UM, AND THEN LIGHTENED INDUSTRIAL ZONING CONTINUING IN INTENSITY AS YOU MOVE FURTHER DOWN.
UM, THIS SECTION OF NACODOCHES FOR OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BOUNDED BY NACODOCHES AND THEN RAILROAD TRACKS IMMEDIATELY ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF RAILROAD TRACKS IS ALAMO CEMENT, UM, AND ZONED FOR CORING DISTRICTS.
SO WE HAVE A LARGE VARIETY OF HEAVY, INTENSE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES ON THIS SECTION OF NACODOCHES ON THIS WEST SIDE OF NACODOCHES BETWEEN US AND THE RAILROAD TRACKS AND ALAMO CEMENT.
SO VERY DIFFERENT LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ON THIS SIDE OF NACODOCHES
[00:20:01]
AS COMPARED TO THE EAST SIDE, WHICH DOES HAVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.WE DO NOT HAVE THE TRADITIONAL LAND USES, LET ALONE ZONING ON THIS SIDE OF NACODOCHES THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH SUBURBAN TIER, WHICH REALLY CALLS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOW INTENSITY, UH, COMMERCIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
UM, THOSE TYPES OF USES, WHICH ARE SPECIFIC TO SUBURBAN TIER ARE JUST NOT PRESENT REALLY ON ANY OF THIS SIDE OF NACODOCHES.
SO WE ARE REQUESTING A PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN, UH, FROM SUBURBAN TIER TWO SPECIALIZED CENTER.
I'M SURE IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PROPERTY REALLY, REALLY ZOOMED IN, YOU DO NOT SEE THAT THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SPECIALIZED CENTER ALREADY ESTABLISHED.
UM, HERE IN THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING USES.
YOU CAN SEE IN THE, THE NORTHWEST CORNER, RIGHT AT 1604 AND THE OH, THANK YOU.
AND THE RAILROAD TRACKS, UM, IS SPECIALIZED CENTER.
UM, THIS REGIONAL CENTER SECTION IS WHAT IS LEFT OF THE ROLLING OAKS MALL.
AND THEN IMMEDIATELY ACROSS NACODOCHES IS THIS LARGE OVER 100 ACRE PIECE OF SPECIALIZED CENTER, WHICH PRESUMABLY SHOULD LOOK FAMILIAR.
UM, THIS WAS CONSIDERED BY THE COMMISSION AND APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, UH, EARLIER THIS YEAR.
SO THIS IS A HUNDRED ACRES OF SPECIALIZED CENTER IMMEDIATELY ACROSS NACODOCHES.
NEXT TO THIS EXISTING ROLLING MEADOWS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, UH, WE HAVE REACHED OUT AND ENGAGED WITH ROLLING MEADOWS AND RECEIVED NO OPPOSITION TO DATE, NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AT ALL.
UM, AND WE'LL CONTINUE ENGAGING WITH THEM.
BUT, UH, SPECIALIZED CENTER IS THOROUGHLY ESTABLISHED HERE AND QUITE HONESTLY, MUCH MORE APPROPRIATE ON THE WEST SIDE THAN IT IS ON THE EAST SIDE SHOWING THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ALONG THIS WEST SIDE OF NACODOCHES.
SO OUR PLAN AMENDMENT IS TRIGGERED BY, UH, OUR ZONING REQUEST TO REZONE TWO L LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY RIGHT HERE IS CURRENTLY ZONE C THREE.
WE ARE ADJACENT TO C THREE ON THE RIGHT.
THIS IS PRIMARILY ALL C THREE UNTIL YOU GET FURTHER DOWN TO C TWO.
UM, THERE IS I ONE, UM, AND THEN I TWO SS TO OUR NORTH THERE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO US.
UM, AS STAFF MENTIONED, UH, WE DID, WE HAVE A PRIMARY USE OF OF WAREHOUSING OFFICE FLEX SPACE.
UM, BUT THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL USE.
UH, THE, THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IS BEING DEVELOPED, UM, AND WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM, UH, TO PURCHASE THE REMAINING BACK THIRD OF THIS PROPERTY FOR THEIR USE.
SO WE HAVE MORE THAN ONE USE, WHICH ELIMINATES OUR ABILITY TO DO A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A C TWO.
UM, ADDITIONALLY THOUGH, I FEEL, UH, AND HOPE YOU DO AS WELL, THAT THE C TWO BASED ZONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE HERE BETWEEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL, UH, CREATES MORE INCONSISTENCY THAN IT DOES REALLY HELP THE SITUATION.
UM, SO WE HAVE A HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE, UM, SCENARIO ON THIS SIDE.
AS, AS I MENTIONED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS IS ALMO CEMENT THAT'S ZONED FOR CORING.
SO WE HAVE REALLY INTENSE USES, NONE OF WHICH LEND THEMSELVES TO CONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBURBAN TIER THAT IT IS.
WE UNDERSTAND THAT THINGS CHANGE AND DEVELOP OVER TIME.
UM, BUT THE SUBURBAN TIER DESIGNATION, PARTICULARLY FOR THIS WEST SIDE OF NACODOCHES AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS JUST NOT CONSISTENT AS IT IS TODAY.
THIS IS JUST ANOTHER AERIAL VIEW.
UM, HOPEFULLY HELPS A LITTLE BIT, UH, JUST A DIFFERENT ANGLE FROM 1604 AND NACODOCHES.
SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT IS LEFT OF ROLLING OAKS MALL.
UM, REALLY THIS ENTIRE SECTION, UM, RIGHT HERE, UH, HAS ALREADY BEEN, UH, USED BY, UH, OCCUPIED BY AMAZON.
THEY'RE USING IT AS A MAJOR DISTRIBUTION FACILITY.
UM, IT WAS JUST OUT THERE LAST NIGHT.
UM, SO NARUS GUN CLUB IS HERE.
UM, AND THEN THIS IS OUR PROPERTY RIGHT HERE.
AND THIS IS THAT LARGE INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO US.
UM, LIKE I SAID, WE HAVE REACHED OUT AND ENGAGED WITH ROLLING MEADOWS.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY NEGATIVE FEEDBACK FROM THEM.
WE HAVE NO OPPOSITION ON THE RECORD.
UM, AND WE'LL BE DEVELOPING FURTHER UP, UM, WITH A LONG DRIVE OFF OF NACODOCHES, UM, TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S, UH, PLENTY OF ROOM ON THIS PROPERTY.
AGAIN, IT IS OVER 25 ACRES, SO THIS IS NOT A SMALL PIECE OF SPECIALIZED CENTER, UM, BUT A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF LAND, UM, THAT IS THOROUGHLY CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE LAND USE AND THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, PARTICULARLY ON THIS SIDE OF NACODOCHES.
UM, THE EAST SIDE RIGHT HERE, RIGHT AROUND THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY IS WHERE THAT I ONE AND SPECIALIZED CENTER IS ALREADY ESTABLISHED.
SO THOROUGHLY ESTABLISHED FOR THIS AREA.
SUBURBAN TIER, UM, JUST UNFORTUNATELY IS NOT CONSISTENT OR COMPATIBLE WITH WHAT IS REALLY ACTUALLY GOING ON OUT HERE ON THE LAND.
SO AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST TO SPECIALIZED CENTER FOR OVER 25 ACRES.
IT IS OUR CONTENTION THAT THE SPECIALIZED CENTER IS NOT INAPPROPRIATE BY ANY MEANS, UM, GIVEN THE EXISTING LAND USE, UH, EXISTING ZONING,
[00:25:01]
THE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ON THIS SIDE, UM, OF NACODOCHES, BUT AS WELL AS CONSIDERING THAT SPECIALIZED CENTER IS ESTABLISHED ON BOTH SIDES, UM, WITH A SIGNIFICANT OVER A HUNDRED ACRES ESTABLISHED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACODOCHES.SO THIS IS THOROUGHLY CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE, UM, WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN.
UM, AND SPECIALIZED CENTER REALLY DOES LEND ITSELF TO WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON OUT HERE, WHEREAS THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE USES THAT ARE ALLOWED AND ONGOING, UM, ON THIS SIDE OF NACODOCHES ARE JUST NOT CONSISTENT WITH SUBURBAN TIER BY ANY MEANS.
SO, UH, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR SUPPORT.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
AND THERE'S NOBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, SO WE'LL MOVE TO COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
WE'LL START ON THE LEFT WITH COMMISSIONER ORIAN.
UH, ON THE STAFF RE UH, ON THE STAFF REPORT IT SAYS THAT C TWO CD, UH, WOULD BE AC UH, ACCEPTABLE FOR THE PROPOSED USE.
BUT YOU HAD JUST MENTIONED THAT, I THOUGHT I HEARD THAT YOU SAID THAT IT WAS NOT.
CAN YOU PLEASE EXPAND ON THAT? YES, ABSOLUTELY.
SO OUR PRIMARY USE IS AN OFFICE WAREHOUSE FLEX SPACE.
UM, BUT THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL USE THAT IS BEING PLANNED FOR ON THIS PROPERTY, UM, THAT WE WOULD BE SELLING TO THE ADJACENT L THE ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED L CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE ZONING MAP? THANK YOU.
THIS PROPERTY, UM, IS ALREADY ZONED FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL NEXT TO THE, THE OTHER INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS.
UM, WE'RE IN DISCUSSIONS, UM, WITH THIS PROPERTY OWNER ON SELLING THE BACK ONE THIRD.
WE'LL BE DEVELOPING THE FRONT TWO THIRDS, UM, FOR THEIR USE, WHICH IS, THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING AN RV PARK.
UM, SO WE HAVE TO CONTEMPLATE MORE THAN ONE USE.
UNFORTUNATELY, YOU CAN ONLY CONDITION DOWN ONE USE IN YOUR ZONING REQUEST, UM, WHICH IS NOT FEASIBLE IN THIS ALTERNATIVE.
OKAY, COMMISSIONER, UH, BUSANTE, NO QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER ZUKI, YOUR PLAN IS TO DO OFFICES, CORRECT? IT'S A WAREHOUSE FLEX BASED DEVELOPMENT WAREHOUSE FLEX PLACE.
AND DO YOU THINK THAT THE, THE SIZE OF THE LAND AND THE WAY IT'S ESTABLISHED RIGHT NOW WILL ALLOW YOU THE INTERIM ROADS AND THE EXIT AND THE, AND THE CAPACITY OF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WOULD BE IN, IN THE WAREHOUSE? YES.
IT'S ACTUALLY HISTORICALLY A LOW TRAFFIC OPERATION.
UM, BUT YES, WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH OUR ENGINEERS TO DEVELOP THE SITE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE, IT LOOKS IT'S A LOT WIDER IN PERSON.
UM, I DON'T HAVE THE MEASUREMENT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, UM, BUT THE PROPERTY IS A LOT WIDER IN PERSON THAN IT LOOKS ON A KIND OF ZOOMED OUT AERIAL MAP.
UM, SO IT IS 25 ACRES, BUT YES, WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH ROOM TO, TO PLANT A DEVELOPMENT THERE IF YOU'RE SELLING THE BACK PART OF THE LAND.
SO YOU ONLY HAVE ONE ACCESS POINT FROM THE FRONT, IS THAT CORRECT? WE ARE DISCUSSING, UM, THEY'RE LOOKING AT A, A SECONDARY ACCESS POINT THAT WOULD THEN CONNECT TO THIS ADJACENT PARCEL.
SO HAVING ACCESS POINTS TO BOTH.
UM, BUT YES, WE, WE HAVE, IT'S GONNA BE ONE INTERIM ACCESS POINTS ONLY.
COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, NO QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
DOES THE INDUSTRIAL AND UH, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONINGS THAT WE SAW IN THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES MATCH THE SUBURBAN TIER LAND USAGE CATEGORIES? NO SIR.
THEY'RE EXISTING NON-CONFORMING.
UH, JUST A CUS COMMENTS, I THINK I AGREE THAT, UH, THIS AREA REALLY ISN'T, UH, FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AND IT'S PROXIMITY TO, TO 1604 AND I 35 KIND OF LENDS IT TO BEING, UH, MORE OF AN INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND OR, YOU KNOW, WAREHOUSE TYPE USE.
AND, UH, CONSIDERING THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, YOU KNOW, YOU SEE LOTS OF L AND C THREE.
SO, UH, I TEND TO SUPPORT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
OKAY, I JUST, UH, NO QUESTIONS FROM ME.
I JUST WANT TO ECHO COMMISSIONER PROFIT'S, UH, COMMENTS.
UH, TO ME THE USE YOU'RE PROPOSING KIND OF FITS WITH WHAT'S HAPPENING ON THAT SIDE OF NACODOCHES, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU CONSIDER ACCESS TO 1604 OR NACODOCHES, WHICH IS A MAIN ROAD AND A RAILROAD BEHIND IT.
UM, YOU KNOW, IT KIND OF LENDS ITSELF TO WAREHOUSE INDUSTRIAL, WHICH IS NEXT DOOR, THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND THE FACT THAT, I GUESS IT WAS EARLIER THIS YEAR, THIS COMMISSION APPROVED THE, UH, SPECIALIZED, UH, DISTRICT THERE ALONG 1604.
SO, UM, I DON'T REALLY SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND THAT.
SO I'M GONNA BE IN FAVOR OF THIS, UH, REQUEST.
[00:30:01]
COMMENTS? UH, JUST ONE MORE QUESTION.UM, I GUESS ANY ZONING OR CHANGES WOULD REQUIRE CERTAIN BUFFERS.
'CAUSE THERE IS THAT I THINK MORE RESIDENTIAL ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET.
IS THAT CORRECT? ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY THERE IT WOULD BE AGAINST LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
SO THEY'RE NOT THE SAME BUFFERS AS IF IT WERE ABUTTING DIRECTLY TO RESIDENTIAL.
ANY FURTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR LAND USE CHANGE SPECIALIZED CENTER.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
WE HAVE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL.
COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES.
UH, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.
APPROVED COMMISSIONER PROFIT? YES.
UH, MOTION PASSES FOR APPROVAL.
[27. Consideration of a Resolution to reschedule the Planning Commission meetings of November 10, 2021, November 24, 2021, December 8, 2021, and December 22, 2021. Staff recommends approval. (Chris McCollin, Planning Coordinator, Christopher.mccollin@sanantonio.gov, (210) 2075014. Development Services Department.)]
ON TO ITEM NUMBER 27.CONSIDERING, UH, MOVING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS AROUND THE HOLIDAYS.
I BELIEVE THIS IS THE ILLUSTRIOUS MR. CHRISTOPHER MCCULLOUGH ITEM TO, TO PRESENT TO THE COMMISSION AFTERNOON.
CHRIS MCCLELLAN, PLANNING COORDINATOR FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION.
UH, WE PUT OUR SCHEDULE OUT PUBLISHED FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAYS IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER.
TO CHANGE THESE, THERE'S A COUPLE OF, UH, SECTIONS.
OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE TO HAVE A QUORUM OF FIVE MEMBERS WITH THE HOLIDAYS.
ALSO, UH, 8 0 7 4 OF THE U D C STATES THAT, UH, REGULAR MEETINGS SHOULD HAPPEN EVERY WEDNESDAY AT TWO O'CLOCK, AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH.
CURRENTLY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE 10TH OF NOVEMBER AND THE 24TH OF NOVEMBER.
UM, OBVIOUSLY WITH VETERAN'S DAY BEING ON THE 11TH, WE CAN FORESEE POSSIBLE, UH, LONG WEEKENDS AND PEOPLE, PEOPLE TAKING THAT FRIDAY.
SO KIND OF DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO HAVE A MEETING ON THE 10TH.
AND THEN ON THE 24TH, THAT IS THE DAY BEFORE WE GO ON, UM, THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY.
AS SUCH, WE SUSPECT THERE MAY BE SOME COMMISSIONERS THAT WILL BE OUT OF TOWN ALREADY.
SO OUR PROPOSAL, AND IN THE NEXT MONTH IN DECEMBER, THEY'RE ON THE EIGHTH AND THE 22ND.
UM, TO FULFILL THE 30 DAY REQUIREMENT, WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT WE SWITCH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATES.
UH, WE CANCEL ALL FOUR MEETINGS AT TWO O'CLOCK ON NOVEMBER 10TH, NOVEMBER 24TH, DECEMBER 8TH, AND DECEMBER 22ND, AND RESCHEDULE ZERO 900 MEETINGS ON NOVEMBER 17TH AND 15TH.
WHAT THAT WILL, WILL ALLOW IS THE OCTOBER 27TH MEETING TO, TO PROGRESS.
UH, THE 17TH OF NOVEMBER MEETING WILL, WILL, WILL BE WITHIN THE 30 DAYS AS WILL THE DECEMBER 15TH MEETING.
AND THEN THE, THE NEXT MEETING, THE VERY FIRST MEETING OF JANUARY, UH, 2022 WILL OCCUR, I BELIEVE, ON THE 12TH OF JANUARY.
SO WE WILL MEET, UH, THAT SECTION OF THE CODE 8 0 7 DASH FOUR THAT'LL, UH, REQUIRES A MEETING EVERY 30 DAYS.
SO, UH, YOU KNOW, IN SUMMATION, CANCEL ALL FOUR MEETINGS AND RESCHEDULE FOR THE 17TH OF NOVEMBER AND THE 15TH OF DECEMBER IN HERE AT ZERO NINE DUE TO H D R C, HAVING THE ROOM THAT AF THOSE AFTERNOONS.
UM, ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION ON THIS? IF NOT, WE CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION DATE REVISIONS AS PRESENTED.
MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE, UH, REVISED DATES.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF, DO WE NEED TO SAY WHAT THOSE REVISED DATES ARE IN OUR MOTION? NO.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE REVISED DATES AS PRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.
UH, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.
[00:35:01]
BUSANTE.[29. Consideration and Approval of the September 22, 2021, Planning Commission Minutes.]
ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS ABOUT THE MINUTES? NEED A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE.
MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT.
I'M, I'M GONNA GIVE THIS ONE TO COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.
WE, UH, ACTUALLY WE DON'T NEED A ROLL CALL.
ANY OPPOSED? ANY OTHER BUSINESS STAFF? WE'RE ALL SQUARED AWAY ON THE UD C.
WE DON'T NEED TO FINISH THAT OFF AT ALL OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? NO, WE'RE GOOD.
WE, I ONE I KNOW OILING MY ROLL SO CLOSE.
[Director’s Report: Status of Planning Commission Appointments Status of Planning Commission Vacancies. Update of UDC Amendment Process and the Planning Commission Technical Advisory Committee.]
I DID JUST HAVE ONE OTHER ITEM ON THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT, UH, A STATUS UPDATE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES.I KNOW WE SENT OUT SOME INFORMATION, UH, TO THE FOLKS, UH, HERE ON THE COMMISSION.
THE POSITION'S CURRENTLY HELD, UH, BY COMMISSIONER, UH, CONNE GONZALEZ, COMMISSIONER, UH, JACKSON, UH, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER GARCIA AND COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA ARE EXPIRING.
THOSE POSITIONS WILL REMAIN IN HOLDOVER STATUS UNTIL CITY COUNCIL TAKES ACTIONS TO REAPPOINT, UH, OR APPOINT SOMEONE ELSE.
UM, BUT AGAIN, THAT APPLICATION WINDOW IS OPEN.
IT WILL REMAIN OPEN UNTIL, I BELIEVE IT'S MIDNIGHT ON OCTOBER 27TH.
SO JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT AS WELL.
AND LOGAN, HOW LONG DO YOU EXPECT THAT PROCESS TO LAST? I MEAN, IT, IT KIND OF GETS INTO THAT WEIRD THING WHERE NOW IT'S, SO YOU'VE GOT THAT THINGS OPEN AND IT'S GONNA GO TO GOVERNANCE AND THAT TAKES THREE AND A HALF YEARS.
SO THE, THE CLERK'S OFFICE WILL GATHER THOSE APPLICATIONS.
THEY'LL SCHEDULE CONSIDERATION BEFORE THE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE.
ULTIMATELY IT HAS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
SO I WOULD ANTICIPATE SEVERAL WEEKS FOLLOWING THAT APPLICATION.
SO MY CONCERN THAT I HAVE AT THIS POINT IS BASED ON WHAT WE JUST TALKED ABOUT WITH THE U D C MM-HMM.
UM, SO WE, WE PROBABLY GOT ENOUGH TIME TO ADDRESS THE BYLAWS, YOU KNOW, AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, EVEN IF WE PUT A COMMISSIONER, YOU KNOW, IF ALL OF OUR COMMISSIONERS AREN'T REAPPLYING, YOU KNOW, IF WE PUT ONE OF THEM ON THE, UH, BYLAW COMMITTEE.
I THINK THAT'LL BE WRAPPED UP BY THEN.
UM, WHEN DO WE HAVE TO MAKE OUR TAC APPOINTMENTS? BY FEBRUARY ONE.
YEAH, I WOULD, I WOULD RECOMMEND, THIS IS MELISSA RAMIREZ, BY THE WAY.
UM, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT, UH, WE HAVE THAT DONE BEFORE FEBRUARY 1ST.
I KNOW THE MOVING TARGET HERE IS THE PLANNING COMMISSIONER APPOINTMENTS.
UM, WE DON'T SET THE GOVERNANCE AGENDA, THE MAYOR DOES.
SO WE WILL COORDINATE WITH THE MAYOR'S OFFICE TO ENSURE THEY UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF WHAT IS GOING ON, UM, OVER HERE FOR OUR BUSINESS.
SO WE'LL MAKE SURE WE HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS.
AND I KNOW THIS IS, THIS ISN'T NORMALLY THE CASE 'CAUSE THEY'RE USUALLY SEPARATED BY MONTHS AND MONTHS.
WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT, BUT NOW IT'S KIND OF COMPRESSED.
SO I KNOW DECEMBER'S HARD TO GET THESE THINGS DONE, SO, BUT ANYWAY.
OKAY, WELL, WE'LL SEE WHERE WE GO.
IS THERE ANY MORE STAFF PRESENTATIONS? THANK YOU.
IT IS 2 51 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.