[00:00:01]
ALL RIGHT, EVERYBODY, IT IS TWO OH THREE.
WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE, UH, FEBRUARY 9TH, 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER.
WOULD STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL? COMMISSIONER LOPEZ.
WHEN NOW WHAT? PRESENT? COMMISSIONER CARILLO.
[Other Items ]
THE MEETING OVER TO STAFF AND WE'RE GONNA DO ELECTION OF OFFICERS.UH, THE UH, ITEM NUMBER TWO ON THE AGENDA IS THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS.
UH, WE NEED TO FILL THE CHAIR, VICE CHAIR, AND THE PRO TEM ROLES.
THESE OFFICERS WILL SERVE A TERM FOR ONE YEAR.
SO WE CAN START WITH ELECTIONS FOR CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND I CAN ACCEPT NOMINATIONS FROM ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION.
I NOMINATE, UH, I NOMINATE, UH, MATTHEW PROFIT FOR CHAIR.
ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? I NOMINATE COMMISSIONER GARCIA FOR CHAIR.
UH, CAN I GET, UH, A VOICE VOTE FOR THOSE, UH, IN FAVOR OF COMMISSIONER PROFIT FOR CHAIR? AYE.
ALRIGHT, SO, COMMISSIONER MATTHEW PROPHET WILL SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
I'LL NOW ACCEPT NOMINATIONS FOR VICE-CHAIR.
I NOMINATE COMMISSIONER, UH, JULIA CARILLO HAYES AS VICE-CHAIR.
ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? HEARING NONE.
CAN I GET A VOICE? VOTE FOR APPOINTING COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES AS VICE-CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
COMMISSIONER AND I WILL TAKE NOMINATIONS FOR PRO TEM.
I NOMINATE MICHAEL GARCIA FOR PRO TEM.
ANY OTHERS? UH, NOMINATE, UH, GEORGE PECK FOR PRO TEM.
ANY OTHERS? ALRIGHT, THOSE IN FAVOR OF, UH, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA FOR PRO TEM.
AND THOSE IN FAVOR OF COMMISSIONER PECK.
WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO RECONSIDER THEIR VOTE? COMMISSIONER.
COMMISSIONER PROPHET WAS VOTED THOUGH.
P COMMISSIONER PECK, YOU'D LIKE TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE TO COMMISSIONER PECK.
OKAY, THEN COMMISSIONER PECK WILL SERVE AS PRO TEM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
UH, LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING THIS YEAR ALONG THE CITY AND OUR NEW COMMISSIONERS AND OUR EXISTING COMMISSIONERS.
AND, UH, AGAIN, THIS IS, UH, FOR, YOU KNOW, FOR THE CITIZENS AND LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING YOUR COMMENT AND, YOU KNOW, RESPECTING EVERYBODY'S OPINION AND THAT WE HAVE ROBUST DISCUSSION HERE THIS YEAR.
UH, TO CONSIDER THE, THE CASES THAT ARE IN FRONT OF US, UH, ONTO TODAY.
UH, I BELIEVE WE NEED TO START WITH THE SPANISH INTERPRETER PLEASE.
THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS TO INFORM YOU THAT WE DO HAVE SPANISH INTERPRETATION SERVICES AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE NEEDING THESE SERVICES.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO APPROACH THE INTERPRETER'S CABIN LOCATED WHERE THE RED CURTAINS ARE LOCATED NEXT TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE.
WE'LL HAVE TWO AGENDAS TODAY, A CONSENT AGENDA AND ITEMS UNDER INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
ALL ITEMS ON THE AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 10 13 ARE AVAILABLE FOR CONSENT.
11 IS POSTPONED AND 12 IS WITHDRAWN.
[00:05:01]
NOW FOR[Public Comment]
ITEM 14, WE DO HAVE SOMEBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.UM, THEY DIDN'T INDICATE WHETHER FOR AGAINST, SO, UH, CAN WE PLEASE HAVE JENNIFER NAGER APPROACH PODIUM? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES.
THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME BE HERE.
UH, MY NAME IS JENNIFER NAGER.
I LIVE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED SITE.
MY ADDRESS IS SEVEN 14 NORTH PINE STREET.
MY BACKYARD IS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED SITE ON ITS NORTHWEST SIDE, AND I MIGHT ADD THAT I OWN A VERY SIMILAR BUSINESS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TOWN.
UM, MR. UDDI, I ASKED EARLIER IF HE IS PLANNING ON, UM, REPLICATING A BUSINESS CALLED BRENTWOOD SOCIAL HOUSE IN AUSTIN.
AND JUST BEFORE THIS HE TOLD ME THAT IT WOULD BE VERY SIMILAR, UM, AND ASKING THE COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE TODAY IN, IN OPPOSITION OF THIS REQUEST.
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING, I'LL ADDRESS MY CONCERNS ABOUT LOW DENSITY MIXED USE.
HIS CURRENT BUSINESS MODEL ALLOWS INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SPACES AVAILABLE TO RENT SEVEN DAYS A WEEK FOR PARTIES UNTIL 10:00 PM AND CLEAN UP TILL 10 30.
IT SAYS HE HAS A SOUND SYSTEM FOR PEOPLE TO PLUG INTO FOR COMMO, FOR COMM CUSTOMERS, MUSIC FOR THEIR PARTIES.
UM, THEREFORE NOR NOISE POLLUTION.
AND TRUST ME, YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE HOW AT, IN NORMALLY VERY QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD NOISE TRAVELS, IT BECOMES MORE LIKE A STADIUM EVENT FOR SOME REASON.
I ALSO NOTICED THAT HE HAS AN EXTREMELY TALL, LARGE COMMERCIAL PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, MUCH OF WHICH REMINDS ME OF WHAT WE SEE AT THE FRIENDLY SPOT HERE IN SOUTH TOWN, WHICH ATTRACTS LARGE CROWDS ON A VERY BUSY COMMERCIAL STREET.
NOT A RESIDENTIAL AREA, IS WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE, WHICH OVERLOOK MY RESIDENCE, THEREFORE LOSS OF PRIVACY, OVERSHADOWING, ET CETERA.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO NOTE THAT THIS WILL NOT ONLY AFFECT THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS, BUT ALSO THE ELDERLY AND THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ADJACENT TO US ON THE EAST SIDE.
UNFORTUNATELY, THEY HAVE NO VOICE HERE TODAY, TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
I SERIOUSLY DOUBT UNFORTUNATELY THAT THE OWNER OF THAT FACILITY IS HERE IN CONCERN FOR ALL THOSE ELDERLY RESIDENTS.
I ALSO SEE PARKING AS A HUGE ISSUE.
THERE IS NONE OR PERHAPS ONE DAY, UM, IF THIS DOES GO TO A DIFFERENT ZONING AS HE'S REQUESTING, IT WILL BE IN MY BACKYARD ONLY STREET PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR, WHICH WE DON'T WANT TO LOOK LIKE AS IN SOUTH TOWN.
AND LA VACA, UM, AND FEEL IS SO OVERTAKING THEIR AREAS.
IT NO LONGER LOOKS OR FEELS RESIDENTIAL.
THE SECOND ITEM I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS IS WHY THE ADDITIONAL ZONING CHANGED TO I I D Z ONE, WHICH I DID NOT GET A NOTIFICATION ABOUT BY THE WAY, IT WAS JUST COME TO MY ATTENTION LAST NIGHT.
IS THERE SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN DO WITH I D Z ONE THAT YOU COULDN'T CURRENTLY DO? LOW DENSITY MIXED USE AND MR. MAUDIE'S WORDS ON THE LETTER REQUESTING ZONING CHANGE, QUOTE UNQUOTE REZONING THIS PROPERTY IN THE SUBSEQUENT BUSINESS CREATION WILL INCREASE THE APPEAL OF THE AREA AND WILL ALLOW FOR THE RESTORATION OF THIS PREVIOUSLY NEGLECTED BUILDING.
I'M NOT SURE YOU NEED ID Z ONE TO DO IT.
TO SUMMARIZE, I'M IN OPPOSITION BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING.
UNACCEPTABLE EFFECTS OVER OVERLOOKING AND LOSS OF PRIVACY, ADEQUACY OF PARKING, TRAFFIC GENERATION NOISE AND DISTURBANCE RESULTING FROM USE POSSIBLE LOSS OF TREES IN LAYOUT DESIGN AND APPEARANCE FROM PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, LIGHT POLLUTION TO OUR PRIVATE RESIDENCES.
ADDITIONALLY, EVEN IF THIS WERE APPROVED, WHICH I HIGHLY HOPE THAT IS NOT A, DON'T SEE THE NECESSITY AGAIN FOR I D Z ONE ZONING, WHICH WOULD ALLOW MR. UDDI IF HE DECIDES TO RESELL THE PROPERTY FOR ANOTHER DEVELOPER TO COME IN AND PUT MORE TERROR MARK HOMES WITHOUT EVEN A SETBACK DIRECTLY AGAINST MY FENCE LINE VISUALLY AND ABSOLUTELY, WHICH VISUALLY AND ABSOLUTELY NO WAY REFLECT AN HISTORIC COMMUNITY.
WE GAVE HER THREE MINUTES AND UNFORTUNATELY I AM NOT CONFIDENT THAT EVEN WITH AN I DZ DASH ONE WITH A C ONE CLASSIFICATION IS A SOLUTION.
I SEE IT AS SOMEONE JUST GETTING THAT MUCH CLOSER TO A POSSIBLE, I DZ ONE APPROVAL IN THE FUTURE AND I PREFER WE JUST PREVENT THAT FROM HAPPENING AND BEING A POSSIBILITY.
THIS IS DIGNA WHITTY HILL, A VERY RESIDENTIAL, QUIET, LOWKEY NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND THAT'S THE REASON THAT WE ARE HERE INSTEAD OF THERE.
UM, AND AGAIN, I OWN A BUSINESS VERY SIMILAR TO THIS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF TOWN AND I, WHAT I'M TALKING TO YOU ABOUT TODAY IS NOT JUST HIS BUSINESS PLAN THERE, BUT ALSO WHAT I HAVE SEEN, UM, MORPH INTO THE BUSINESS PLAN THAT WE HAVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF TOWN.
AND IT DEFINITELY WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING THAT I WOULD HAVE PROPOSED IN THAT RESIDENTIAL AREA OVER THERE IN VIV.
WE ALSO HAVE ONE VOICEMAIL, SIR.
SHOULD WE PLAY THAT NOW? WE WE'RE GONNA PULL THAT FOR INDIVIDUAL.
[Plats ]
TO CONFIRM FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ALL ITEMS THE EXCEPTIONS OF 10 11, WHICH IS POSTPONED 12 WITH WHICH IS WITHDRAWN.I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.
SECOND MOTION TO PROVE BY COMMISSIONER, UH, VICE CHAIR, UH, CARILLO HAYNES.
STAFF, DO YOU ROLL CALL, VOTE PLEASE.
[00:10:03]
YES.COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES? YES.
[Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments ]
ALRIGHT, UH, ONTO THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS, WE'LL START WITH NUMBER 10.ITEM NUMBER 10 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RE RESOLUTION AMENDING THE STINSON AIRPORT VICINITY LAND USE PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND PARKS.
GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 9,400 BLOCK OF SOUTHEAST LOOP FOUR 10.
TWO RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION VIA CORONADO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS OPPOSED.
THERE WERE 360 OPPOSED OUTSIDE OF 200 FEET.
OPPOSED ONLINE PETITION AND MISSION SAN JOSE AND HOT WELLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ARE ALSO OPPOSED.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A CONTINUANCE TO MARCH THE NINTH.
UH, WE HAVE TWO CITIZENS THAT HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
UH, AND AGAIN, UH, JUST JUST TO CLARIFY THAT THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO THE MARCH 9TH MEETING.
SO IF YOU STILL WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK NOW, YOU'RE WELCOME TO OR YOU CAN WAIT TILL THE NEXT MEETING.
SO THE FIRST PERSON WE HAVE TO SIGN UP TO SPEAK IS MR. TOBY BOWMAN, IF YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE IN THREE MINUTES.
AND YEAH, MY NAME IS TOBY BOWMAN.
I LIVE AT 32 39 SCARLET O'HARA.
UM, I'M FOR IT BECAUSE IT'S, IT'S LOOKS LIKE IT'S GOOD DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD OR, OR THE SOUTHEAST AREA IS REALLY STARTING TO DEVELOP.
I LIKE THE FACT THAT THEY'RE HAVING COMMERCIAL ASSIGNED TO THE FRONT.
UH, ESPECIALLY LIKE A LIGHTER USE, LIKE A C ONE TYPE, YOU KNOW, TYPE BUSINESSES I THINK ARE REALLY NICE, ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO THE I ONE THAT IT'S ZONED RIGHT NOW.
UM, I ALSO LIKE THAT THEY'RE PLANNING FOR THE, THE MULTIFAMILY IN THE REAR.
UM, I DO LIKE HOW THE SITE PLAN, I DIDN'T REALIZE HOW IMPORTANT THE SITE PLAN IN THIS STAGE IS SO IMPORTANT, BUT IT SHOWS THE PLACEMENT FOR THE AREAS THAT THE COMMERCIAL AND THE MULTIFAMILY WILL BE IN.
SO THAT WAS ONE OF MY CONCERNS WAS HOW LARGE, UH, YOU KNOW, THERE, I THINK THERE, I KNOW THIS IS KIND OF GETTING INTO THE ZONING STUFF.
UH, THIS IS JUST MORE FOR THE MIXED USE, BUT THIS KIND OF GOES ALONG WITH THAT SITE PLAN.
SO, UM, THE 381 UNITS THAT THEY'RE, I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO PROPOSE, UH, FOR THAT.
I JUST, I LIKE THE, THE SITE PLAN.
I THINK WHAT IT'S, IT'S INTENDED TO IS TO MAKE SURE THAT OKAY, THIS AMOUNT OF AREA WILL BE USED FOR THAT MULTIFAMILY.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE, UM, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT LIKE, UH, FOUR ACRES WON'T BE USED FOR THAT MULTI, YOU KNOW, THAT 381 UNITS.
UH, BUT, SO THIS SOUNDS, SOUNDS LIKE THE SITE PLAN KIND OF REGULATES THAT.
IT ALSO SOUNDS LIKE IT REGULATES THE, UH, ENTRY INTO THE SUBDIVISION RIGHT THERE.
SO THAT WAS ONE OF MY CONCERNS TOO.
BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE I DON'T SEE IT UP THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT I, THE, UH, I'M ASSUMING THAT'S WHAT THAT SITE PLAN SHOWS NO ACCESS INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
SO THAT WAS ONE OF MY CONCERNS.
UM, 'CAUSE I LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, SO THE ONE THING I KNOW THIS IS, UH, BUT I WANNA SEE IF THIS CAN BE PUT ON THE, UH, THE SITE PLAN IS THAT THE I D Z ZONING, THAT THEY'RE GONNA REQUEST THE IDZ TWO NEXT WEEK, UH, GETS THEM OUT OF DIFFERENT THINGS.
BUT ONE OF THE, UH, THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST, UH, A NORMAL C ONE ZONING IN THE FRONT TO A MAJOR ARTERIAL REQUIRES A TYPE B BUFFER, WHICH IS, IS 15 FEET AND ROUGHLY LIKE FOUR TREES EVERY 100 FEET.
SO I, UM, SO I WOULD LIKE THEM TO, UH, THERE'S OTHER, I KNOW THERE'S OTHER LANDSCAPE
[00:15:01]
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS, OTHER PLANTING REQUIREMENTS, BUT IT DOESN'T FORCE THEM TO PUT TREES IN THE FRONT.AND I THINK THAT'S A, AN IMPORTANT THING FOR CORRIDOR DISTRICTS, ESPECIALLY LIKE FOUR 10.
SO I WOULD LIKE THEM TO, UH, PUT ON THERE THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF TYPE A, WHICH IS ONLY A 10 FEET, UH, DEEP, UH, BUFFER WITH FOUR TREES TOO LARGE, TOO SMALL, EVERY 100 FEET.
SO THAT WOULD BE MY REQUEST FOR THEM TO, UH, PROVIDE THAT OR STATE THAT ON THEIR SITE PLAN THAT THEY WOULD BE, THAT THEY WOULD PROVIDE THAT.
AND THEN THAT WOULD MAKE ME MORE FOR IT
I AM HERE TO REPRESENT SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK AND WOLF HERITAGE SITE.
UM, I MENTION THIS IN NOVEMBER AND I WANNA, IF YOU COULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS.
AND, UM, WE SPOKE IN NOVEMBER TO, WE SAID THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THE PROPERTY LINE ON THIS AREA.
THIS PROPERTY THAT IS BEING PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT, UM, BORDERS THE NATIONAL PARK AND THE SAN JUAN SECA.
AND IN FACT, NOW WITH THIS NEW PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE PARK USE TO MIXED USE, UM, THAT ACTUALLY YOUR ZONING MAP, IF YOU LOOK AT IT, IT GOES OVER INTO OUR PROPERTY AND ACTUALLY SUGGESTS THAT YOU COULD DEVELOP THE SAN JUAN SEIA.
UM, WE OVERLAID THE, UM, MAP ONTO OUR LAND MAP AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY'RE ACTUALLY PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF THE SAN JUAN SEIA TO MIXED USE.
UM, SO WE DON'T FEEL THAT THERE'S ANY NECESSITY TO CHANGE OUR PARK USE ZONING ON OUR PROPERTY, UM, AS PART OF THIS PROJECT.
SO WE JUST WANTED TO AGAIN, INFORM PEOPLE THAT THIS IS INDEED YOUR NATIONAL PARK AND YOUR WORLD HERITAGE SITE BOUNDARY, AND IT IS FEDERAL PROPERTY.
SO, UM, AS THEY'RE WORKING ON WHEN ON THE DEVELOPMENT, WE NEED TO KEEP MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PROTECTING THAT AREA.
THERE'S ANOTHER ONE, IF YOU FLIP THAT ONE OVER, THEN YOU'LL SEE THE OTHER MAP THAT THEY PROVIDED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
SO THAT'S THE OTHER, YEAH, FLIP IT THE OTHER WAY.
SO IN THAT ONE YOU CAN SEE THAT CONCEPTUAL MAP, ACTUALLY THE PARKING LOTS WOULD DRAIN INTO THE SAN JUAN SEIA.
SO I JUST WANTED, WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT, THAT THE COMMISSION IS CLEAR ABOUT WHO THE NEIGHBOR IS.
UH, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO THE MARCH 9TH MEETING, IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR.
AND WE HAVE SOME VOICEMAILS WE'LL NEED TO PLAY AS WELL, SIR.
MY NAME IS ALLISON ELDER AND I'M THE DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES AT THE SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY.
I'M, I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF THE SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY WITH REGARD TO YOUR AGENDA.
ITEM NUMBER 10, UH, CASE NUMBER OH OH SEVEN ONE SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY HAS NOT RECEIVED OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT.
WE ARE REQUESTING TODAY AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AS WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE PRESERVATION OF THE SAN JUAN SEIA, AS WELL AS ANY IMPACTS TO SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY PROPERTY OR THE MISSION REACH TRAIL SYSTEM.
IF YOU NEED MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME.
MY NUMBER'S TWO TEN THREE OH TWO THREE TWO TWO NINE.
AGAIN, THIS IS ALLISON ELDER, DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES, SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY, CALLING ON BEHALF OF THE RIVER AUTHORITY.
YES, MY NAME IS ROSEBUD COFFEE WITH MISSION HERITAGE PARTNERS, THE FRIENDS GROUP TO THE SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, UH, REFERENCING ASSOCIATED ZONING CASE LAST FOUR DIGITS 0 2 1 4.
ROLAND DE RUSS ATE IS THE PLANNER I'M CALLING TO ASK TO DELAY THE ACTION.
THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NEEDS MORE TIME TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT.
THAT'S PLEASE DELAY ACTION ON THIS.
THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NEEDS MORE TIME TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT.
THAT'S ALL THE VOICEMAILS? YES, SIR.
UH, ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? ORIAN, UH, I HAVE A QUESTION.
UH, A REMARK MADE BY ONE OF THE SPEAKERS ABOUT WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE WAS IS, IS, HAS ANYBODY, UH, REVIEWED THE SURVEY THAT WAS SUBMITTED
[00:20:01]
JUST TO ENSURE THAT IT IS IN EFFECT THEIR LAND? I KNOW STAFF DOESN'T, YOU KNOW, VERIFY SURVEYS LIKE I'M, I'M IMPLYING, BUT I'M JUST WONDERING THAT WITH THAT CONDITION RAISED JUST CATHERINE HERNANDEZ, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR.UM, SO THE, UH, ONLY THE OWNER CAN PROVIDE A, UM, APPLICATION TO REZONE OR AMEND THE PLAN.
UH, THE PLAN AMENDMENT MAP IS SHOWING A GENERAL LOCATION.
IT'S NOT GONNA SHOW ALL, UH, PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINES, BUT THE APPLICANT IS HERE THAT CAN, UM, PROVIDE MAYBE SOME CLARIFICATION AS TO THE SMALL PIECE THAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.
HI, DAVE ABRAMS, 1 22 EAST BRANDON, UH, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
UH, I'M ACTUALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEVELOPER.
UM, AND, UH, WE, WE'VE ACTUALLY BEEN VERY DILIGENT ON ENSURING THAT THE PROPERTY LINES, UH, ARE OUTSIDE OF THE, UH, OF THE NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY.
UH, AND IN FACT, AS PART OF CLOSING THIS, UH, THIS PURCHASE, THE SELLER AT THE REQUEST OF THE BUYER WILL ISSUE A QUICK CLAIM DEEDED FOR ALMOST A HALF AN ACRE, UH, TO ENSURE THAT WHAT IS WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY A HISTORIC EASEMENT NOT ENTERED INTO RECORD WILL BECOME NATIONAL PARK LAND.
SO HE'S ACTUALLY ASKED THE SELLER, AND THE SELLER HAS AGREED TO SIGN THIS, THIS QUICK CLAIM SO THAT HE CAN ENSURE THAT HIS BOUNDARY IS OUTSIDE OF THE NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY.
UH, AND, AND, AND THERE WAS AN AREA OF UNCLEAR TITLE AT ONE POINT, AND THAT'S HOW WE WERE, UH, RESOLVING THIS, UH, THIS ISSUE.
SO I THINK THAT, UH, THAT IT'S PRETTY CLEAR WE'RE STAYING OUT.
ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF, AND I GUESS IT'S MORE DRAINAGE RELATED, AND THIS IS, I'M JUST CURIOUS.
IT'S NOT GONNA AFFECT MY OPINION ON IT RIGHT NOW TODAY ANYWAY, BUT, UH, UM, IS THERE ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAINING ONTO THE ASAKIA AREA? SO THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE, AND THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING, UM, THE DRAINAGE INCLUDING, UH, THE PARKING AREAS WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE NEXT STAGE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
ZONING JUST LOOKS AT WHAT IS THE USE OF THE PROPERTY.
UM, AND SO THEY'LL HAVE THE PLAT PROCESS IN WHICH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW INCLUDES THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION, AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE THE BUILDING DESIGN, UH, COMPONENT, WHICH HAS TO GO TO H D R C FOR THAT.
SO ALL OF THOSE COMPONENTS WILL BE LOOKED AT, INCLUDING THE RESPECT TO THE ASAKIA.
UM, I KNOW THIS IS LIKELY GONNA GET, UH, CONTINUED, BUT, UM, SINCE YOU BROUGHT UP THOSE TWO OFFICES, KATT, UM, WHAT DOES EITHER YOU OR, OR SOME ANOTHER STAFF, CAN YOU COMMENT ON WHERE THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN, UM, THE OFFICE OR THE WORLD HERITAGE OFFICE STAND ON THIS PROJECT? SO THEY DON'T, UH, TYPICALLY PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION.
WHAT WE DO IS WE HAVE AN INTERNAL, UH, COMMUNICATION PATH, UH, TO NOTIFY OUR INTERNAL CITY DEPARTMENTS OF CASES THAT ARE WITHIN AREAS THAT THEY HAVE PURVIEW OVER.
SO SINCE THIS ISN'T WITHIN THE MISSION HISTORIC DISTRICT, UM, THEY, WE SEND APPLICATIONS TO OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION.
SO THEY'RE AWARE OF IT ALSO BECAUSE IT'S WITHIN THE WORLD HERITAGE BUFFER AREA, WE SEND IT TO THEM AS WELL.
UH, SO AGAIN, THEY'RE JUST THERE TO HEAR, UM, WHAT, WHAT DEVELOPMENT IS COMING DOWN THE PIPELINE BECAUSE AS THOSE, UH, PROJECTS GET DEVELOPED, THEN THEY LOOK AT OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS, THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT ARE WITHIN THEIR ZONES.
AND H D R C, OF COURSE, BECAUSE THIS IS NEW, NEW CONSTRUCTION, THEY NEED TO BE AWARE OF IT BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT THEY'LL, THEY'LL BE SEEING THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION, UH, DESIGN APPLICATION FOR THEIR PROCESS.
THEY MADE A COMMENT ABOUT NOT BEING NOTIFIED.
SO ONLY PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, UM, ARE, UH, REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED AS WELL AS REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS.
SARAH IS NOT A REGISTERED PROPERTY OWNER OF ANY PROPERTY WITHIN THIS 200 FEET AREA.
UM, THEY'RE ALSO NOT ONE OF OUR INTERNAL CITY DEPARTMENTS.
UH, SO, UH, THEY, THEY HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THIS PROJECT.
IT STARTED WHEN IT WAS FIRST, UM, APPLIED FOR IN AUGUST AND HAS BEEN AT MULTIPLE COMMISSION MEETINGS, ESPECIALLY AT ZONING COMMISSION.
IT, THIS IS JUST AN AMENDED REQUEST.
UH, SO AS THEY HEARD, THEY JUST WANT, UH, MORE INFORMATION BECAUSE NOW THEY'RE, WE'RE GETTING INTO THE SITE PLAN DESIGN, WHICH ISN'T GOING TO, UH, TELL YOU EXACTLY, UM, YOU KNOW, TO THE, TO THE FOOT WHERE THE PROP PROPERTY BUILDINGS ARE GONNA BE.
IT'S JUST WHERE THE, THOSE LAND USES ARE.
UH, SO NOW THAT THEY'VE GOT THAT REQUEST, THEY JUST WANT A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO TALK WITH
[00:25:01]
THE APPLICANT ABOUT THAT.YOU HAVE A QUESTION OF OPPOSITIONS THAT WAS, UH, SENT TO THIS CASE NUMBER.
WAS IT AFTER THE APPLICANT CHANGED THE AMENDMENT TO MIXED USE OR BEFORE? SO AGAIN, TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE, HOW THE AMENDMENT DERIVED.
SO AGAIN, THIS HAS BEEN HEARD BY THE ZONING COMMISSION SEVERAL TIMES, UH, BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN TWO POINTS THAT, UM, HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP, WHICH WAS DENSITY AS WELL AS, UH, THE ACCESS, UM, OR HAVING NO ACCESS ALONG, UH, NATCH.
UM, SO THE, THE, THE, THE IDEA WAS BROUGHT UP BY ONE OF THE ZONING COMMISSIONERS BECAUSE MF 25 WOULD GET THEM TO 381 UNITS.
BUT ACTUALLY IF YOU DID THAT BY THE ACREAGE, THEY GOT A LITTLE BIT MORE UNITS, ALTHOUGH THEY WERE WILLING TO SOLIDIFY, UH, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS WITH DEEDED RESTRICTIONS.
SO THE ZONING COMMISSIONER BROUGHT UP THE IDEA, WELL, CAN'T I D Z DO THAT IF THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT'S ELIGIBLE TO APPLY AND YES, IT CAN, YOU CAN LOCK DOWN WITH BY ORDINANCE AND THE CITY CAN ENFORCE THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS AND INCORPORATE THE, UH, COMMERCIAL COMPONENT THAT HAD BEEN BROUGHT UP IN DISCUSSIONS.
UH, SO THAT REQUIRED A REIFICATION OF TO THE COMMISSIONS IN ORDER TO CONSIDER THE I D Z.
UM, AND SO WE HAD UNDERSTOOD THAT THAT WAS GOING TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES.
SO THE, THE NEW, UM, OPPOSITION WAS RECEIVED AFTER THIS NEW NOTICE WENT OUT.
ANY FURTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? UH, I JUST HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.
DOES SARAH HAVE ANY JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW AT SOME POINT? UH, IN THE PROCESS ON THE, BECAUSE IT'S IN THE SEIA, I BELIEVE THEY'RE A TECHNICAL REVIEWING AGENCY OF THE PLAT.
THERE BE SOME ON THE SAN JUAN DITCH CORPORATION THAT IS HEADED BY THE SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY AND THEN BASED ON WATER RIGHTS.
YOUR, YOU WANNA COME UP TO THE MIC? PUBLIC IS CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION IS UNDER DISCUSSION.
UM, THE, WHAT SHE'S WHAT, UH, THE SAN JUAN DITCH CORPORATION, UM, IS A, IS COMPRISED OF MULTIPLE ENTITIES.
SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY IS ONE OF THOSE, UM, OWNERS.
I BELIEVE THERE'S A LONG HISTORIC, UH, INFORMATION THAT'S AVAILABLE, UM, THE PAST 10 YEARS.
I KNOW THEY'VE WORKED REALLY HARD TO, UH, SOLIDIFY THAT OWNERSHIP.
SO WE MIGHT WANNA JUST, UH, DOUBLE CHECK OUR OWNERSHIP RECORDS PROPERTY.
AND AGAIN, THEY'RE FOR PROPERTY FROM BEAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.
THAT'S WHERE WE GET OUR OWNERSHIP RECORDS.
SO IF THEY WANT TO, UM, CLEAR, CLEAR THAT UP, THEY NEED TO WORK WITH BEXAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.
BUT AGAIN, THEY ARE A TECHNICAL REVIEWING AGENCY IN THE PLATT PROCESS.
AND, UM, THOSE, THE DRAINAGE CONCERNS TO THE ASA ALL THAT WOULD BE LOOKED AT DURING THAT PROCESS.
ANY FURTHER FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN, UH, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 9TH.
I MAKE A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 9TH SECOND.
SECOND BY VICE CHAIR CILLO HAYNES, SHOULD WE DO, UH, VOTE PLEASE? COMMISSIONER CILLO HAYNES? YES.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER 13, FROM WHICH I WILL BE RECUSING AND HANDING THE MEETING OVER TO VICE CHAIR CARILLO HAYNES.
DO WE HAVE A STAFF PRESENTATION FOR ITEM 13? GOOD AFTERNOON.
MY NAME IS DESPINA ZAKO ZONING PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
I NUMBER 13 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN FROM SUBURBANS HERE TO REGIONAL CENTER, LOCATED AT 2 3 7 7 5 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 10 WEST.
THERE WERE SEVEN NOTICES SENT OUT.
ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSE AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS A PLAN AMENDMENT TO REGIONAL CENTER TO REONE TO C THREE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR THEIR EXISTING RESTAURANT BUSINESS.
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW FOR THE HIGHEST INTENSITY OF COMMERCIAL, WHEREAS THE EXISTING SUBURBAN, THE EXISTING SUBURBANS HERE DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR MEDIUM INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USES, WHICH ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
THE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR THE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED APPROPRIATELY GIVEN CURRENT USE PERMITTING RESTAURANT USE WITHOUT COVER CHARGE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL ON THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
[00:30:09]
MR. WEIR, ARE YOU HERE? YES.STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR UH, MY NAME IS PAUL WEIR, 1 28 MARY TRAIL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 3 2.
UM, IN 2002, UH, MY PARTNER AND I BOUGHT THE PROPERTY, UH, SAID PROPERTY 2 3 7 7 5 IH 10, UH, SOLICITED THERE.
UM, WE BEGAN CONSTRUCTION IN LATE 2002 AND IT WAS UNDER BEXAR COUNTY, UH, IN BETWEEN 2000 BY 2003, I BELIEVE IT WAS ANNEXED.
UH, THAT PART OF THE CITY WAS XANAX, UH, BY SAN ANTONIO.
AND SO, UH, SOME CODES CHANGED IN THE MIDDLE OF CONSTRUCTION.
WE HAD TO ADD A, A BIG DRAINAGE DITCH, WHICH ACTUALLY ENDED UP SAVING THAT BUILDING FROM THAT HORRIBLE FLOOD WE HAD IN 2003.
UM, BUT IT'S BEEN LISTED UNDER R SIX ZONING RESIDENTIAL SINCE THAT TIME.
AND WHETHER THAT WAS OVERLOOKED, OVERSEEN, UH, YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE MAP, THE OVERALL MAP.
THERE'S A LOT OF, UH, C THREE PROPERTIES THAT DO SURROUND US, UH, ACROSS I 10 NEXT TO US.
UM, EVEN UP ABOVE, UH, THERE'S AN AUTO.
UM, YOU COULD, YOU CAN SEE THERE'S AN AUTO REPAIR.
UH, THERE'S A LOST PPAS NEXT TO US IS STARBUCKS.
UM, THERE'S AN EMPTY LOT BEHIND US.
IT'S ABOUT FIVE AND A HALF ACRES.
UM, AND SO WE WERE JUST REQUESTING THE FACT THAT TO CHANGE TO COMMERCIAL C THREE, UH, BECAUSE WE'RE NOT SPRING CHICKENS ANYMORE, I GUESS WE'RE, UH, UH, AT A POINT IN OUR CAREER THAT WE'RE, UH, YOU KNOW, HA FACED TO MAKE SOME HARD CHANGES DUE TO C O V I D.
UM, IT'S REALLY STRAINED OUR, OUR BUSINESS.
UM, SO THERE'S A POTENTIAL THAT WE MAY HAVE TO CLOSE SOME OF OUR STORES, UH, BUT STILL BE ABLE TO TRY TO UTILIZE THESE EMPLOYEES.
UM, LAST THING THAT I THINK THE CITY WANTS IS AN EMPTY BUILDING TO SIT THERE AND IT BE CLOSED AND IT TURN INTO WHATEVER IT BECOMES AND THEN IT LOSES VALUE.
UM, AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'VE PUT A LOT OF SWEAT EQUITY INTO.
SO OUR REQUEST IS, YOU KNOW, TO, UH, GET OUR C THREE.
UM, WE ARE WILLING TO WORK WITH THE ZONING COMMITTEE, UH, ON RESTRICTING CERTAIN USES, UM, THAT WE DON'T WANNA SEE EITHER ADULT BOOKSTORES AND SUCH AND TIRES AND GAS STATIONS OR TAXI SERVICES AND SUCH THINGS THAT AREN'T APPEALING TO THAT AREA.
UH, WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME AND A LOT OF MONEY ON THAT BUILDING AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF IT.
AND WE ALSO FEEL THAT THAT'S ONE OF THE MAIN ATTRACTIONS, UM, TO THAT STOREFRONT IS THE CURB APPEAL.
'CAUSE IT'S BUILT LIKE A HILL COUNTRY HOUSE.
AND, UH, IT'S GOTTEN, YOU KNOW, DEFINITELY HAS GOTTEN SOME ATTENTION.
UM, AND I THINK THAT ANYBODY THAT DOES BUY IT, I MEAN, IT'S BUILT AS A RESTAURANT.
I DON'T SEE ANYONE THAT COULD WITHOUT KNOCKING IT DOWN.
UM, WHICH SHOULD BE VERY, UH, NOT VERY COST EFFECTIVE, BUT I COULD SEE ANOTHER RESTAURANT CONCEPT GOING IN THAT WOULD BE ABLE TO SERVE ALCOHOL, MIXED BEVERAGE PERMITS AND MAYBE STAY OPEN LATER AND HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT SURVIVING.
UM, WE ALL KNOW THAT TDOT IS NOT BY PLAN, BUT AS DEFINITELY BUILT OVERPASSES AT CERTAIN AREAS AND HAVE KILLED BUSINESSES, KILLED RESTAURANTS, BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW FOOD IS ABOUT CONVENIENCE AND LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION.
SO WE ALSO HAVE TWO LETTERS FROM LASPAS AND FROST BANK, WHICH ARE THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS NEXT TO US, AND THEY'RE IN FULL AGREEMENT WITH US.
AND, UH, I GUESS THAT'S ABOUT IT.
I'LL NOW TURN OVER TO COMMISSIONERS FOR QUESTIONS.
I'M GONNA START WITH COMMISSIONER ZUKI
UM, I'M STILL NOT CLEAR WHY YOU WANTED TO CHANGE THE LAND USE TO REGIONAL CENTER.
HOW, HOW THAT'S GONNA HELP THE BUSINESS? WELL, I I THINK THAT, UH, LEAVING THIS RESIDENTIAL, IT LIMITS THE, IT LIMITS THE USE AND BY CHANGING IT, IT ACTUALLY VALUES THE PROPERTY.
IT VALUE, I MEAN, IT INCREASES THE VALUE OF THE
[00:35:01]
PROPERTY BY GIVING IT MORE OPTIONS AS OPPOSED TO STRICTLY JUST A RESTAURANT.THAT'S NOT GONNA CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS CURRENTLY.
BUT THAT'S NOT GONNA CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS CURRENTLY THE WAY YOU OPERATE, CORRECT? CORRECT.
BUT IT OPENS THE DOOR FOR WHOEVER YOU SELL THE PROPERTY TO IN THE FUTURE.
I COULDN'T TELL YOU WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN TOMORROW, LET ALONE FIVE YEARS FROM NOW.
UH, I MAY OR MAY NOT BE HERE, GOD WILLING, BUT I'D LIKE TO TRY TO GET MY KIDS AND MY FAMILY SET UP TO WHERE THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
I, I TOOK THIS PROJECT ON, I'M NOT A REAL ESTATE AGENT, I'M A CHEF.
UH, BUT I CAN TELL YOU, YOU KNOW, I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A LOT EASIER GOING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL SINCE WE ARE COMMERCIAL THAN GOING FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL.
I COULD SEE HOW THAT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT.
BUT OBVIOUSLY IT'S NOT A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS WHAT IT'S LISTED AS.
SO WE THINK THAT CHANGING IT TO THE COMMERCIAL WOULD OBVIOUSLY RAISE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY AND GIVING IT MORE LAND USE.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER SCHINDLER.
I, UH, I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS.
UM, THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO GO FOR A ZONING OF C THREE, BUT THE, UM, THE CURRENT USE CAN FUNCTION IN A C TWO, IS THAT CORRECT? WITHOUT A PLAN AMENDMENT? THAT'S CORRECT.
SO THERE WOULD BE NO, NO CHANGE IN THE WAY HE'S FUNCTIONING TODAY IF IT WAS A C TWO ZONING TO ELIMINATE THE PLAN AMENDMENT? CORRECT.
SO HOW COME, WHY WOULD YOU NOT WANT TO GO C TWO AND AVOID THE PLAN AMENDMENT? WELL, NOT KNOWING THE ZONING AND, AND WHAT LIMITATIONS ARE I'D, I'D READ A CHART, LIKE 85 PAGES OF ZONING RESTRICTIONS.
UM, I DON'T KNOW IF SOMEONE WOULD WANT TO BUILD A RESTAURANT, ANOTHER RESTAURANT THERE.
SO IF WE WERE TO SELL THAT PROPERTY TOMORROW, FIVE YEARS OR 10 YEARS, I THINK IT HAS THAT ABILITY AS A C THREE FOR BETTER LAND USE WITHOUT DESTROYING THE BUILDING ITSELF, BECAUSE IF THAT MAKES SENSE.
YEAH, NO, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, BUT THE RUB HERE REALLY IS THE REGIONAL CENTER PART IN THAT, UM, YOU KNOW, TO GO C THREE, YOU HAVE TO GO REGIONAL CENTER, WHICH IS TYPICALLY RESERVED FOR BIG BOX, THINK WALMART, UH, YOU KNOW, HOME DEPOT, LOWE'S, THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
AND THERE'S NO OTHER REGIONAL CENTER IN THIS IMMEDIATE AREA.
AND THIS WOULD, IF IT WERE GIVEN THE REGIONAL CENTER DESIGNATION, IT WOULD GIVE A FOOTHOLD TO THOSE KINDS OF USES IN THIS AREA, WHICH I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WANTS.
SO THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE THE RUB IS.
AND, AND I, YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO AND I FULLY SUPPORT IT, BUT I DON'T THINK I CAN SUPPORT THE REGIONAL CENTER IN THAT AREA, WHICH MEANS YOU WOULD HAVE TO GO TO A C TWO ZONING.
BECAUSE OUR PURVIEW HERE TODAY IS WHETHER IT'S REGIONAL CENTER OR WHAT IS IT NOW, SUBURBAN OR STAYING SUBURBAN TIER.
THAT'S, WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ZONING.
WE'RE ONLY VOTING ON THE REGIONAL CENTER PART.
I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE REGIONAL CENTER IS, QUOTE UNQUOTE.
SO REGIONAL CENTERS AND STAFF CAN, CAN, UH, UH, FILL IN THE GAPS IF YOU NEED TO.
BUT A REGIONAL CENTER THINK, UH, THINK A BIG SHOPPING CENTER WITH, UH, YOU KNOW, LIKE A LOWE'S AND A HOME DEPOT AND A, WELL, IT'S ONLY 1.13 ACRES.
RIGHT? I MEAN, I DON'T SEE HOW THAT YEAH.
WELL, IT PROVIDES A FOOTHOLD IN AN AREA THAT'S NOT CONDUCIVE FOR REGIONAL CENTER.
AND THOSE TYPES OF USES ARE TYPICALLY A MAJOR INTERSECTIONS.
LIKE I 10, 16, 0 4, YOU KNOW, DAYS OF ALL I 10, THOSE BIG INTERSECTIONS.
SO THAT'S KIND OF THE RUB FOR ME AND, YOU KNOW, UH, DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, STOP YOU FROM WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO, BUT I THINK THERE'S AN AVENUE FOR YOU TO DO WHAT YOU NEED TO DO WITHOUT GOING TO REGIONAL CENTER.
THANKS COMMISSIONER GARCIA, I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE MAYBE CONTINUOUS SO THEY CAN WORK IT OUT.
I THINK THEY'RE PRETTY CLOSE AND WE ALL UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO, AND I HOPE MAYBE STAFF CAN WORK THINGS OUT.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER OREN? YES.
SO WE HEARD A LOT OF COMMENTS ABOUT, UH, THE AREA AND, AND YOUR ABILITY TO USE THIS, UH, FOR WHAT YOU HAVE NOW, BUT I DO UNDERSTAND THE IDEA OF, OF YOU BEING ABLE TO HAVE MORE POTENTIAL THERE.
THE QUESTION I HAVE IS, UH, IN THIS COMMISSION REALLY IS, IS IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
SO TO THE NORTH OF VIEW, NORTH OF SALE OF VISTA DIRECTLY, THERE IS A LARGE A G B RETAIL CENTER, A FUEL STATION, THEN YOU HAVE SIERRA VISTA, AND THEN THERE'S A FROST BANK AND A
[00:40:01]
STARBUCKS, AND THEN IT'S YOU AND THEN THE LAS PALUS.BUT AS YOU MOVE TO THE SOUTH, YOU KNOW, YOU, YOU GOT LOOKS LIKE AN AUTO SHOP ORTHODONTICS, A MED CLINIC, A LOT OF USES THAT, THAT ARE C THREE SORT OF USES A LOT OF C THREE ZONING, THE ENTIRE STRETCH OF LAND ACROSS THE HIGHWAY DIRECT FROM U WITH C THREE.
I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND WHY C THREE'S FINE, BUT WE HEARD COMMENT THAT THERE WAS, UH, DEEDED RESTRICTIONS, UH, BEING DISCUSSED WITH THE ZONING COMMISSION.
SO IF WE, IF WE WERE TO MOVE FORWARD AND GIVE YOU, UH, WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR, UH, IS, ARE YOU STATING THAT THAT IT, IT IS YOUR INTENT TO DO DEED RESTRICTIONS ON THIS AS YOU MOVE FORWARD THROUGH ZONING SO THAT IT WOULDN'T HAVE THIS OFF THIS UN UNFORESEEN, UH, INTENSIVE POTENTIAL FOR WHAT C THREE COULD POTENTIALLY BE? YES, IT IS.
I MEAN, I, I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S FINE FOR THE AREA, ESPECIALLY FOR WHAT YOU'RE SURROUNDED BY AND THE FACT THAT I TEN'S BEEN COMPLETELY, UH, ENHANCED AND WIDENED AND, AND, AND YOU HAVE C THREE RIGHT BEHIND YOU.
SO I, I SEE NO ISSUE WITH THIS.
UM, SO COMMISSIONER GARCIA, WAS THAT A, A MOTION TO FOR CONTINUOUS OR I CAN MAKE THAT A MOTION.
IS THAT APPROPRIATE STAFF TO ALLOW HIM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
UH, I THINK WE SHOULD JUST LET THIS GENTLEMAN MOVE FORWARD.
IS THERE A SECOND? SO, I MEAN, HE HAS SUPPORT LETTERS FROM THE NEIGHBORS.
SO WITH THAT, I'LL, I MOVED TO, TO, UH, APPROVE PLAN AMENDMENT CASE PA 2022 DASH ONE 16, UH, TO GO TO REGIONAL CENTER.
IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND ROLL CALL PLEASE.
OH, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? JUST ONE COMMENT THAT THIS SHOULD BE APPROVED AND LET COUNSEL WORK THIS OUT IN ZONING.
I MEAN, WE'RE JUST MAKING A RECOMMENDATION.
IF COUNSEL'S REALLY IN SUPPORT OF THIS, HE'S NOT GONNA HAVE ANY PROBLEMS. JUST ONE COMMENT.
NO MATTER HOW THIS TURNS OUT, YOU STILL HAVE THE BEST BURGERS IN TOWN.
I SAID, NO MATTER HOW THIS TURNS OUT, YOU STILL HAVE THE BEST BURGERS IN TOWN.
I SHOULD HAVE BROUGHT GIFT CARDS, BUT I DON'T WANNA LOOK LIKE I WAS TRYING TO BRIBE ANYBODY.
YEAH, I KNOW, I KNOW THE RULES.
STEPH, CAN YOU DO A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? COMMISSIONER ZUKI? YES.
I'M GONNA VOTE NO SOLELY ON THE REGIONAL CENTER ISSUE.
PLEASE, PLEASE APPRECIATE EVERYTHING.
AND COMMISSIONER OR CHAIR PROFIT HAS REENTERED THE MEETING.
UH, NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 14 AS STAFF PRESENTATION.
I'M A PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO.
ITEM NUMBER 14, AS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE NUITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY MIXED USE, LOCATED AT 9 1 7 NOLAN STREET.
THERE WERE 28 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED NO RESPONSE FROM NUITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR OUTSIDE 200 FEET AND A GROUP BY THE NAME OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF DIGNITY HILL ARE OPPOSED.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS A PLAN AMENDMENT TO LOW DENSITY MIXED USE TO REZONE TO I D Z ONE, LIMITED LIMITED INTENSITY INFILL DEVELOPMENT ZONE WITH USES PERMITTED FOR ONE DWELLING UNIT AND SEE ONE LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IN ORDER TO DEVELOP A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT WITH AN UPSTAIRS RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
LOW DENSITY MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ARE ALREADY FOUND IN THE AREA, INCLUDING THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORY WILL MEET THE HOUSING AND ECO ECONOMIC GOALS LISTED UNDER THE DEITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.
THIS INCLUDES INTEGRATING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY AND ADD ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPTIONS WHILE STILL LIMITING THE INTENSITY OF USES PERMITTED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT, UH, TO MAKE A PRESENTATION? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS.
MY NAME IS SHARAM UDDI, UM, REQUESTING THE REZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY, 9 1 7
[00:45:01]
NOLAN STREET.AND I'M TRYING TO BUILD A COFFEE SHOP, UM, INTERNET CAFE AND WITH THE RESIDENTIAL IN THE TOP OF IT, BASICALLY THE SECOND FLOOR.
AND UM, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE BUILDING IS COMPLETELY, UM, NOTHING YOU CAN DO MOSTLY HAS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND REBUILT.
IT'S BEEN LIKE THIS FOR PROBABLY LAST 40, 50 YEARS AND THERE IS NO PLUMBING OR ANYTHING WHATSOEVER.
AND, UH, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SHOW ANY OF THIS.
I HAVE SOME SKETCHES OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO AND I UNDERSTAND THERE WAS A CONCERN ABOUT SOME KIND OF, UH, COFFEE SHOP I HAVE IN AUSTIN THAT IT'S, UH, UM, BASICALLY PLAYGROUND FOR THE KIDS.
I DON'T NECESSARILY RUN IN IT, I DON'T, I'M NOT PLANNING TO HAVE ANY KIND OF PLAYGROUND FOR THE KIDS FOR CONCERN ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, FAR AS NOISE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
UM, JUST TRYING TO BASICALLY BUILD SOMETHING FOR MYSELF ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND THE COFFEE SHOP, INTERNET CAFE FOR DOWNSTAIRS, KEEPING THE, BASICALLY THE SAME SHAPE OF THE BUILDING THE WAY IT IS EXCEPT ANY WALLS OR ANYTHING IN THE FIRST FLOOR.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALL AROUND ME ACROSS THE STREET IS A, UM, REST LITTLE DINER AND BODY SHOP, UM, LIQUOR STORE OR BAR RIGHT ACROSS OF IT, UM, FRONT OF ME.
SO I TALK TO A LOTS OF PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
UH, I KNOW I DON'T SEE ANYBODY AT ANY, I MEAN, THEY'RE WAITING FOR ME TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, SO MY REQUEST WAS TO HAVE THE, TO BUILD SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
DEFINITELY IT'S GONNA BE BEAUTIFUL.
AT THIS TIME WE'LL START WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S QUESTIONS.
WE'LL START DOWN HERE TO THE LEFT WITH COMMISSIONER ORIAN.
UM, WITH, UH, SOMETIMES WE SEE EXISTING USES IN ZONING THAT ARE IN CONTRAST TO THE, TO THE, TO SOME OF THESE, UH, PLANS.
UH, IS THAT THE CASE ON THIS UP AND DOWN THE STREET? THERE WAS, UM, IF YOU WANT IS THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OTHER USES THAT ARE NOT TYPICALLY ALLOWED THERE, BUT THEY'RE, THAT ARE CONDUCIVE TO WHAT THIS APPLICANT IS ATTEMPTING TO DO.
I MEAN, LOW, LOW DENSITY MIXED USE.
OKAY, SO THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THERE'S ALREADY SOME OF THE LOW DENSITY, UH, MIXED USE IN THE AREA OR OH NO.
WHAT ARE THE EXISTING USES THAT ARE ESTABLISHED BUSINESSES? UM, ANY KIND OF RESIDENTIAL TYPE UNITS, YOU KNOW, WITHIN A BLOCK OF THIS.
ARE THERE, ARE THERE SOME THAT ARE IN CONTRAST TO, TO THE ADOPTED PLAN FOR THE AREA? UH, SURE.
SO YEAH, THERE'S SOME AREAS ALREADY THAT HAVE THAT LOW DENSITY, UM, MIXED USE FOUND IN THE AREA, SPECIFICALLY NORTH, UH, EXCUSE ME, SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH ALSO GOT REZONED TO I D Z.
UM, AND THEN THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR ALSO HAS SOME OF THE LOW DENSITY MIXED OR HAS LOW DENSITY MIXED USE DESIGNATIONS AND THEIR COMMERCIAL USES, HOWEVER THEY'RE COMMERCIAL USES.
HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES FOUND IN THE AREA AS WELL.
I, I SAW IN YOUR STAFF REPORT THAT THAT MAY HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE REASONS THAT YOU WERE IN SUPPORT BECAUSE THERE'S ALREADY SOME OF THE LOW DENSITY MIXED USES FOUND THERE.
CAN STAFF, UM, RUN THROUGH THE, THE COUNTS FOR ME AGAIN, I'M SORRY, I MISSED, UH, WORK SESSION, BUT NOTICES MAILED AND THOSE IN FAVOR AND, UM, ANY OPPOSED? SURE.
SO WE RECEIVED 28, UH, EXCUSE ME, WE MAILED OUT 28 NOTICES.
WE RECEIVED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED WITHIN THE 200 FEET.
UM, WE ALSO SENT OUT THE NOTIFICATION TO DITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND DIDN'T RECEIVE A RESPONSE.
UM, WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR OUTSIDE THE 200 FEET AND THEN GROUP, UM, NAMED CONCERNED CITIZENS OF DITY HILL ARE OPPOSED.
SO THE, UM, THE COMMENT THAT WE RECEIVED THAT WAS EMAILED TO US ABOUT THE COMMUNITY WANTING MORE TIME, WAS THAT WITHIN THE 200, UM, FLEET BUFFER? NO, THAT'S THAT OTHER ORGANIZATION THAT IS OPPOSED
[00:50:01]
THE, THE OFFICIAL, UM, REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS DIGNITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THEY DIDN'T RESPOND.UM, IS THE APPLICANT, ARE YOU AWARE OF THE, THE REQUEST FROM THE COMMUNITY TO, UH, HAVE CONTINUED DISCUSSIONS ON THIS? I'M SORRY, I I'M SORRY I DON'T KNOW THE PROCESS, BUT DOES STAFF SHARE THOSE WITH THE APPLICANT WHEN WE RECEIVE, UH, EMAIL COMMENTS? OH, OKAY.
WE JUST GOT 'EM TODAY, BUT YES, WE OH, OKAY.
I JUST WANTED TO HEAR MORE ABOUT YOUR ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY, UM, BEING THAT WE, WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY RESPONDENTS TO THE NOTICE OF THIS CHANGE IF YOU'VE ENGAGED WITH THE COMMUNITY AND THIS, YOU MENTIONED THAT YOU HAVE, BUT WE RECEIVED, UH, AN EMAIL TODAY.
THE COMMISSION DID, UH, REQUESTING MORE TIME TO DISCUSS THIS WITH YOU AND LEARN MORE ABOUT YOUR PLANS.
THERE'S ALSO ONE VOICEMAIL IN OPPOSITION FOR THIS, FOR THIS, FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
AND, HELLO, MY NAME IS LULU FRANCOIS.
I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF DIGNITY HILL.
I LIVE AT 8 1 7 NOLAN AND WE ARE CALLING IN TODAY TO SPEAK AGAINST PLANNING COMMISSION CASE PA 20 22 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 FOR NINE 17 NOLAN, THE CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF DIGNITY HILL ARE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONING OR TO THIS PLANNING, UH, COMMISSION CASE FOR NINE 17 NOLAN, WE JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS CASE FROM A CONCERNED RESIDENT AND WE WERE NEVER NOTIFIED THAT THIS WAS CASE WAS GOING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY THE NINTH, EVEN THOUGH WE REQUESTED AND WERE WERE PROVIDED WITH THE ZONING CASE INFORMATION SCHEDULED TO GO IN FRONT OF THE ZONING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY THE 15TH FOR THE SAME PROPERTY.
REBECCA RODRIGUEZ, THE PLANNER, SHOULD HAVE MADE THIS PLANNING COMMISSION CASE KNOWN TO THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF DIGON WOODY HILL WHEN WE REQUESTED THE DOCUMENTS FOR THE ZONING CASE.
THE FACT THAT SHE NEVER MENTIONED IT MAKES IT CONFUSING FOR EVERYBODY WHEN THEY'RE NOT SURE WHAT CASE THIS IS VERSUS WHAT THE CASE IS FOR FEBRUARY THE 15TH.
AND WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS IF YOU DO NOT VOTE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS CASE, WE ASK THAT YOU POSTPONE IT UNTIL THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF DIGNITY HILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BLOCK, WALK AND EDUCATE THE RESIDENTS THAT FALL WITHIN THE 200 FOOT BOUNDARY OF THIS REQUEST.
SO THERE IS NO LONGER CONFUSION ABOUT THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE TWO CASES.
IF HE, IF WE DID DO A CONTINUANCE, WHAT WOULD BE THE, THE EARLIEST DATE THAT HE COULD COME BACK? THE 23RD FEBRUARY 23RD, TWO WEEKS? UM, WOULD YOU BE, UH, OPEN TO A CONTINUANCE TO THE FEBRUARY 23RD? SURE.
I WHAT DAY IS THAT? I DON'T KNOW.
UH, IT, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S THE WEDNESDAY, SO IT'S IN TWO WEEKS FROM TODAY.
I HAVE NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.
ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONER PECK, UH, NO QUESTIONS, BUT TO ME, UM, YOU KNOW, OUR PURVIEW HERE IS TO DECIDE WHETHER IT'S LOW DENSITY, MIXED USE IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
SO, UM, I I'M IN FAVOR OF THE, OF THE APPLICATION.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER SCHINDLER.
COMMISSIONER ZUKI, I SUPPORT THE CONTINUATION TO WORK WITH THE CITIZENS AND ADDRESS THE COMMENTS THAT THEY HAVE AND SEE IF YOU CAN FIND THE RESOLUTION BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING.
UH, THANKS FOR ALL THE COMMISSIONER'S, UH, COMMENTS.
UM, FOR STAFF, FOR, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THE, THE CONCERN NEIGHBORS OF DIGNITY HILL IS NOT A REGISTERED ORGANIZATION, THUS WEREN'T REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.
THERE'S A COUPLE OF NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAVE, UH, SPLINTERED OFF.
AND SO, UM, THE, THE REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS, UH, DIGNITY HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, AND THEY WERE REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED.
AND THEY HAVE BEEN, UM, THERE ARE SOME GROUPS THAT HAVE SPLINTERED OFF.
UH, THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED.
UH, HOWEVER, ANYONE CAN SIGN UP TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THROUGH OUR ESSAY SPEAKUP SYSTEM.
AND SO, UM, THEY WON'T RECEIVE THE MAIL, THE ACTUAL NOTICE THROUGH THE MAIL, BUT THEY CAN RECEIVE EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS OF CASES THAT HAVE BEEN FILED.
UH, SO NO, THEY'RE NOT REGISTERED WITH THE CITY AND WE'VE LET THEM KNOW TO GET IN TOUCH WITH A DEPARTMENT THAT DOES HANDLE THAT.
UH, I, I ECHO COMMISSIONER PECK, I DO THINK THIS IS, YOU KNOW, FROM A LAND USE PERSPECTIVE, A GOOD SITE FOR, UH, LOW DENSITY MIXED USE.
BUT I'M GONNA, UH, ALSO BE CONSIDERATE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IF YOU'RE WILLING TO WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY, AND THAT'S ALWAYS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS, YOU KNOW, A, A GOOD BALANCE OF ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY.
UM, ONE QUESTION FOR YOU, SIR, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST REAL QUICK,
[00:55:01]
I MIGHT HAVE MISSED THIS IN YOUR PRESENTATION, BUT IS THIS THE, THE, THE BOTTOM OF THE BUILDING IS, IS RETAIL USE, BUT ARE YOU PLANNING TO LIVE ABOVE IT OR IS THAT A ABOVE IT FOR RENT? ACTUALLY, I HAD THE PLAN, IT'S GONNA BE LIKE A TWO BEDROOM WITH LIKE THREE BEDROOM, UH, APARTMENT.AND DOWNSTAIRS GONNA BE LIKE A OPEN, UH, INTERNET CAFE WITH THE COFFEE SHOP.
BUT, UH, BAKER FOR, FOR RENT, THE, THE, THE, UH, DWELLING ABOVE IT WOULD BE FOR RENT.
THE, THE YOU'RE YOU'RE GONNA NO, I'M GONNA USE IT MYSELF.
YOU'RE GONNA LIVE IN IT? OH YEAH.
YEAH, THAT'S WHY I'M BUILDING IT FOR MYSELF.
UM, I KNOW THERE WAS A MOTION MADE FOR CONTINUANCE, I'LL MOTION FOR A, A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE.
UM, I, I'M NOT, I'M NOT IN OPPOSITION TO YOUR, YOUR OVERALL PLAN.
I JUST WOULD LIKE TO SEE CONTINUED DIALOGUE WITH THE COMMUNITY.
SECOND MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TWO FEBRUARY 23RD BY VICE CHAIR HANES, AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ZUKI.
CAN YOU PLEASE DO ROLL CALL VOTE COMMISSIONER? SO THERE'S GONNA BE ANOTHER MEETING ON THE 15 AND ANOTHER MEETING ON 23RD.
THE VERY SOONEST MEETING IS THE 23RD.
YEAH, I THINK THAT'S THE ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
COMMISSIONER CARILLO HAYNES? YES.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
[Approval of Minutes ]
APPROVAL OF MINUTES, DO I HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVED.SECOND MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER PECK.
AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ZUKI VOTE PLEASE.
COMMISSIONER CARILLO HANES? YES.
[Director’s Report ]
DIRECTOR'S REPORT? MOTION PASSES FOR APPROVAL.LOGAN SPARROW, POLICY ADMINISTRATOR.
UH, WELL, JUST ONE ITEM FOR DIRECTOR'S REPORT.
WANTED TO LET THE COMMISSION KNOW, UH, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS STARTED REVIEWING U D C AMENDMENTS.
UH, THE FIRST STEP IN THAT PROCESS WAS FOR THEM TO REVIEW THE 43 EXTERNAL AMENDMENTS, UH, THAT WE RECEIVED AS PART OF THIS CYCLE.
UH, OF THE 43, THE TAC DETERMINED THAT THREE MET THE EDIT OR CLARIFYING CONDITION TO AUTOMATICALLY MOVE FORWARD FOR CONSIDERATION.
UH, BUT THAT WE WILL BE TAKING THE 40 THAT THEY DETERMINED TO BE GREATER THAN AN EDITOR OR CLARIFICATION AND PLACING THOSE ON THE FEBRUARY 23RD PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
UH, BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF INFORMATION THERE.
WE WILL BE SENDING YOU THOSE, UH, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, UH, WELL IN ADVANCE OF THE AGENDA, UH, TO GIVE YOU AS MUCH TIME AS POSSIBLE TO REVIEW THEM.
UM, ADDITIONALLY WE WILL START THAT, UH, WORK SESSION ON THE 23RD AT NOON WE'LL PROVIDE LUNCH.
UH, WE WILL HAVE, UH, TECHNICAL STAFF FROM ZONING, PLATINGS, UH, YOU KNOW, STORM WATER, UH, ET CETERA, AVAILABLE TO HELP ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, UH, THAT YOU ALL MAY HAVE ABOUT THE IMPACT OF THOSE AMENDMENTS.
AND FOR CONSIDERATION ON THAT AGENDA WILL BE DETERMINING WHICH OF THOSE 40 THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO SPONSOR.
SPONSORSHIP SIMPLY MEANS THAT THE COMMISSION RECOGNIZES THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE WANT TO HAVE DISCUSSION ON AT TAC AND WE ALLOW IT TO MOVE FORWARD.
UH, SHOULD THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHOOSE NOT TO SPONSOR ANY OF THOSE AMENDMENTS, THEN THEY WOULD, THEY WOULD DIE IN THE PROCESS AND THAT WOULD BE IT.
UH, SO AGAIN, THAT WILL START ON THE 23RD, BUT WE WILL BE SURE TO GET YOU THAT INFORMATION WELL IN ADVANCE.
ANY QUESTIONS? AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, LIKE I SAID, IN A WORK SESSION, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE PREPARED TO THE LEVEL THAT WE'RE GONNA DISCUSS ANY LANGUAGE CHANGES IN THE, IN THE, UH, UH, THE AMENDMENTS.
JUST BASICALLY, IF THE INTENT OF THE AMENDMENT YOU THINK IS SOMETHING SHOULD MOVE FORWARD.
AND LOGAN, WHEN YOU SAY WELL IN ADVANCE, THAT'S LIKE A WEEK, TWO WEEKS MAYBE.
IF YOU CAN GET THAT TO US WELL IN ADVANCE, WELL IN ADVANCE, THAT'D BE VERY APPRECIATED.
AS IF THAT, IF THAT'S EVERYTHING, THEN IT'S 3 0 3
[01:00:01]
AND THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED.