[00:00:05]
WELCOME TO OUR CITY COUNCIL ZONING SESSION.
THE TIME IS 2:10 PM ON THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE, 2022.
UH, MADAM CLERK, UH, WE'RE CALLING OUR SESSION
[ Roll Call ]
ORDER.COULD YOU READ THE ROLL? COUNCIL MEMBER BRAVO IS HERE VIRTUALLY.
COUNCIL MEMBER MCKAY RODRIGUEZ.
COUNCIL MEMBER COURAGE PRESENT.
AND, UH, ONCE AGAIN, GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE.
WE HAVE A FULL ITEM, A FULL AGENDA TODAY,
[Public Hearing and Consideration of the following Adoption and Amendments of the Neighborhood, Community and Perimeter Plans as Components of the Master Plan and Zoning Cases. Plan amendments and Zoning cases presented by Roderick Sanchez, Assistant City Manager; Michael Shannon, Director, Development Services unless otherwise noted. ]
AND AS IS CUSTOMARY, WE HAVE SOME ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONTINUED, UH, FOR MORE CONSIDERATION AND DELIBERATION.UH, LET ME READ THOSE ITEMS NOW, UH, SCHEDULED TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 16TH ARE ITEM SIX AND SEVEN, ITEM 17, AND THEN ITEMS 20 AND 21, WE HAVE ONE ITEM THAT WILL BE CONTINUED TO AUGUST 18TH, THAT'S ITEM 15.
AND THEN WE HAVE A FEW ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION TODAY.
ITEM THREE, ITEM 10 AND 11, ITEM 18, AND THEN ITEM 22.
NOW, IF, UM, IF NONE OF THE, SO ALL THE OTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA WILL BE, UH, HEARD ON CONSENT, SO THOSE ITEMS THAT WILL BE CONTINUED OR HEARD INDIVIDUALLY, OTHER THAN THOSE, I'LL ASK MY COLLEAGUES.
NOW, IF THERE ARE NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION AT THIS TIME.
IF THERE ARE NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT ZONING AGENDA.
THAT'S ITEMS 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, AND 19.
UH, IF YOU'LL GIMME JUST A MOMENT, MAKE SURE THAT NO ONE IS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT ARE REMAINING ON CONSENT.
OKAY, THERE IS ONE CITIZEN SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON CONSENT.
ITEM 16, JACK FINGER, COME ON UP.
IS MAYOR NURENBERG, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR SAN ANTONIO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS JACK M FINGER, ONE ITEM I I'D LIKE TO BRING UP TO YOUR ATTENTION ON THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA, UM, THAT YOU'RE GOING TO JUST SIMPLY SAIL RIGHT ON THROUGH IS ITEM NUMBER 16, AND THAT'S IN MR. PALAIS DISTRICT.
UH, I DON'T KNOW WHO IS DECIDING TO GET, CARRY THIS ONE FOR HIM, BUT, UH, UH, WHOEVER IT IS, I APPRECIATE IF YOU WOULD, UH, FOREGO JUST LETTING IT SAIL RIGHT ON THROUGH.
THIS IS ABOUT A, OH, CHANGING THE, UH, UH, ZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY LOT TO A MULTI-FAMILY LOT OR SPECIFIC, SPECIFICALLY AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.
AND, UH, THERE, THE REASON WHY THIS IS OF CONCERN IS BECAUSE OF THE 22 NOTICES THAT, UH, WENT OUT TO THE SURROUNDING PEOPLE WITHIN A COUPLE OF HUNDRED FEET.
THERE AS, AS MANY AS BETWEEN 20 AND 25% SAID THEY DIDN'T WANT IT.
NOW, WHEN YOU HAVE ANYTHING MORE THAN FIVE OR 10%, UH, THAT IS SIGNIFICANT.
AND HERE YOU HAD AS MUCH AS 2020 5%.
UM, AND APPARENTLY THEY, THEY DO NOT WANT THIS APARTMENT COMPLEX OVER ON THEIR, THEIR RIGHT
SO WHOEVER IS, UH, UH, DEALING WITH FOR, FROM MR. PAPA'S, UH, UH, CASES, I'D APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD, UH, AT THE VERY LEAST, CONTINUE THIS THING UNTIL HE GETS BACK AND, AND FACES IT TO, TO ALL OF US ON HIS OWN THERE.
ALRIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL TO CONSENT ZONING AGENDA.
ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE TO A VOTE.
COUNCILMAN BRAVO, IF YOU CAN GIVE US
[00:05:01]
A VOICE VOTE ON THE CONSENT.BEFORE WE GO TO OUR INDIVIDUAL ITEMS, LET ME TAKE UP THOSE ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED.
UH, FOR CONTINUANCE, WE HAVE FOR JUNE 16TH, ITEM SIX AND SEVEN, ITEM 17, ITEMS 20 AND 21.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THOSE OWNING ITEMS TO JUNE 16TH.
ALL RIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND CONTINUANCE OF THOSE ITEMS TO JUNE 16TH.
UM, WE DO HAVE SOME CITIZENS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THOSE ITEMS. AGAIN, THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE HEARD TODAY, SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO SIGNAL ME AND SEED YOUR TIME, WE'RE GONNA TAKE THESE ITEMS UP AGAIN AT, AT THE JUNE 16TH AGENDA.
IF, UH, SO YOU CAN, YOU CAN YIELD YOUR TIME OR YOU, YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP AND SPEAK AS WELL.
SO I'LL CALL THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THOSE ITEMS FOR JUNE 16TH.
JACK FINGER, MR. FINGER, YOU'D BE FOLLOWED BY PETRO GONZALEZ.
UH, MAYOR BERG, ANOTHER MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RECORD.
WELL, ABOUT TWO OR THREE CASES I'D LIKE TO BRING YOUR ATTENTION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO CONTINUE.
UM, ONE OF 'EM IS, UM, THE COMPANION CASES OF ITEM NUMBER SIX AND SEVEN, AND THIS, UH, FALLS IN MS, UH, VIA GRAND'S AREA.
NOW, SHE'S NOT HERE AT THIS TIME.
I, I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE IS, BUT WHOEVER IS CARRYING HER WATER FOR HER, I APPRECIATE IF YOU WOULD, UH, UH, WELL, I'D SAY JUST TO SAY NO TO THE WHOLE THING HERE AND WHY, IT'S BECAUSE, WELL, IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY, INCLUDING THE BACKUP DOCUMENTS THAT I SAW AS A NUMBER OF, UH, RED FLAGS HERE, THE ZONING STAFF THOUGHT IT WAS A BAD IDEA.
THE PLANNING STAFF THOUGHT SIX AND SEVEN WERE A BAD IDEAS.
WHY? WELL, YOU HAVE, YOU'RE TRYING TO GET FROM SHOEHORN AS MUCH AS YOU, YOU EIGHT COUNT 'EM EIGHT DWELLING UNITS INTO THIS LITTLE LOT RIGHT HERE.
YOU HAD OUT OF 15 NOTICES THAT WENT OUT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, 10 OF THEM FROM THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTS CAME BACK.
THAT'S TWO THIRD, THAT'S TWO THIRDS, 66% SAYING THEY DON'T WANT IT.
SO WHY NOT JUST SAY NO TO THE WHOLE THING RIGHT NOW? THE STAFF THAT THOUGHT IT WAS TOO DENSE, HE WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT'S WHY OTHER ITEMS I WISH TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION ON THIS PORTION HERE.
QUITE A, QUITE A FEW CASES HERE.
ITEM 17, THAT'S IN, UH, ONCE AGAIN IN MR. PALAIS DISTRICT AND WHO'S EVER DEALING WITH HIS, UH, PLEASE REMIND HIM THAT, UH, OUTTA THE 37 NOTICES THAT WENT OUT.
YEAH, THAT'S OVER HALF, 50%, MY GOD.
UH, AND, AND SEVEN PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF THE 200 BOUNDARY.
WHY? WELL, I GUESS THEY DON'T WANT THE, AN APARTMENT COMPLEX RIGHT NEXT TO THEIR, THEIR RESIDE RESIDENCES THERE.
SO WHO'S EVER DOING IT SAY, TO SAY NO TO, TO IT FOR MR. PLY OR, ANYWAY, THAT, AND, UH, FINALLY, UM, YEAH, I DO WISH TO BRING YOUR ATTENTION ITEM.
I THINK I WILL, WILL BRING YOUR ATTENTION.
I NUMBER 21 AND THIS, UH, IS IN MR. MR. PERRY, YOUR DISTRICT THERE.
UM, ONCE AGAIN, MR. FINGER, I'LL, I'LL, I'LL CALL UP.
UM, CONTINUE ACTUALLY, GO AHEAD.
WELL, I WAS JUST GONNA SAY AS MUCH AS, UH, NEARLY ONE OUT OF 10 PEOPLE WHO THOUGHT THE, UH, THE APARTMENT COMPLEX WAS A BAD ONE AS WELL.
UH, WHY NOT JUST SAY NO TO IT? THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON TO ITEM SIX.
MR. GONZALEZ, YOU'LL BE FOLLOWED BY CECILIA DE LA CRUZ DE LA LU.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR COUNCIL, ME PEOPLE.
UH, I'M ALSO OBJECTING TO THIS, UH, APARTMENT BUILDING THAT'S BEING PROPOSED FOR THAT AREA WHERE WE LIVE.
AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH CRIME, ENOUGH SHOOTINGS.
THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT COME ALONGSIDE THE RIVER PASSED THROUGH OUR PROPERTIES.
UH, I LIVE AT THE CORNER OF PROBAND AND TRUAX, AND THIS IS JUST ONE BLOCK FROM WHERE I'M AT,
[00:10:01]
AND MY NEIGHBORS HERE ARE IN THE SAME SITUATION.WE'VE GOT SHOOTINGS, PEOPLE FIGHTING.
WE, WE, WE, WE DON'T WANT THAT.
WE WANT A SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE CAN'T HAVE IT.
THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT WE SEE ALL THE TIME.
SO, YOU KNOW, WE WANNA OBJECT TO THIS, AND I WANT IT.
AND I HAVE MY, MY NEIGHBORS ALSO WANT TO OBJECT.
UM, MY NAME IS CECILIA DE LALU.
UM, I LIVE ON FRONT OF WHERE Y'ALL WANT TO BUILD, UM, THE APARTMENT COMPLEX.
UM, I OBJECT TO THIS APARTMENT BUILDING BECAUSE WE ALREADY DO, WE HAVE A LOT OF GUNFIRE, WE HAVE A LOT OF DRUGS.
UM, JUST THIS PAST WEEKEND, WE HAD SOMEBODY JUMP OUR SIX FOOT FENCE TO HIDE FROM THE POLICE THAT NEVER SHOWED UP BECAUSE HE HAD DRUGS AND HE HAD A GUN.
UM, WE HAVE A LOT OF GUNFIRE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT THAT NOBODY SHOWS UP FOR WHEN WE CALL.
UM, WE HAVE A LOT OF THINGS GOING ON.
I LITERALLY LIVE BEHIND THAT EMPTY LOT WHERE Y'ALL WANNA BUILD THE APARTMENT, AND THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS GOING ON THERE.
UM, PEOPLE DON'T SHOW UP WHEN WE CALL.
THEY DON'T HELP US WHEN THEY DO GO.
WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SAFE AS POSSIBLE AND TO ADD SOME OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER FACILITIES TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT GONNA HELP WHATSOEVER.
UM, RIGHT THERE BY THE RIVER IS THE BRIDGE.
THERE'S A LOT OF HOMELESS PEOPLE.
THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS GOING ON.
AND, UM, YES, I OBJECT TO IT TOO.
AND I FEEL THAT WE'RE NOT ALREADY SAFE.
ADDING OTHER PEOPLE TO THE, TO THE, TO THE CROWD THERE IS JUST NOT GONNA HELP AT ALL WHATSOEVER.
WE ALSO HAVE, UM, OH, THAT'S EVERYONE WHO SPIT, WHO HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT ARE BEING MOVED TO JUNE 16TH.
UM, WE'RE GONNA TAKE UP THIS VOTE FOR MOVING THOSE ITEMS TO JUNE 16TH.
IT'S NOT GONNA BE DECIDED TODAY.
ALRIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE VOTE.
BRAVO, IF YOU COULD GIVE US A VOICE.
OKAY, WE'LL WE WILL RESUME THOSE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THOSE ITEMS ON JUNE 16TH.
NOW WE HAVE ONE ITEM 15 DUE CONTINUE TO AUGUST 18TH.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THAT.
UH, WE HAVE ONE CITIZEN SIGNED SPEAK ON ITEM 15.
ACTUALLY, A COUPLE FOLKS, UH, JACK FINGER, MR. FINGY WILL BE FOLLOWED BY CATHERINE MANNA.
UH, MAYOR BERG, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
ONCE AGAIN, MY NAME IS JACK M FINGER AND, UH, ITEM 15 IS, UH, THE ONE THAT I HAVE A PARTICULAR INTEREST IN HERE.
I NOTICED THAT, WELL, THIS IS IN ONCE AGAIN.
WELL, THIS IS IN MISS SANDOVAL'S AREA, DISTRICT SEVEN, AND IT'S ABOUT THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY THERE.
I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW IF MR. K, IF IT WAS YOU WHO MAY MADE THE MOTION TO CONTINUE IT THERE, BUT, UH, UM, THERE ARE SO MANY RED FLAGS WITH THIS.
MY QUESTION IS, WHY IS ANYBODY, WHY, WHY, WHY WOULD ANYBODY EVEN THINK TO MOVE IT AS MANY AS JUNE, JULY, OR TWO MONTHS FROM NOW? YEAH, I MEAN, THE, BOTH THE STAFF AND THE ZONING COMMISSION SAID IT WAS A BAD IDEA.
WHY? WELL, IT'S BECAUSE IT'S TOO DENSE FOR THE AREA THERE.
ADDING TO 10 RESIDENTS FOR THE ASSISTED LIVING.
I'M SORRY, WE'RE NOT AGAINST ASSISTED LIVING, BUT I MEAN, THERE ARE RESIDENTS WHO HAVE TO LIVE AROUND THERE.
THEY'RE THE ONES THAT HAVE TO LIVE WITH THIS SITUATION.
YOU HAD, UH, 14 NOTICES GO OUT SAYING IT WAS, UH, AND NINE, NINE OF THEM CAME BACK.
[00:15:01]
WHAT IS THAT PERCENTAGE WISE? TWO THIRDS, UH, OUTSIDE THE, UM, 200 FOOT LIMIT, YOU HAD 132 PEOPLE.132, UH, NOTICES COME BACK OPPOSING IT.
YOU HAVE FOUR COUNT 'EM, NOT ONE, NOT TWO, BUT FOUR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS OPPOSING TO THIS THING.
ALAMO FARMSTEADS ON BABCOCK ROAD, FAIRWAY HILLS, OAKLAND ESTATES, THE SCATTER OAKS.
YOU HAD 14 PEOPLE SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS.
AT THE, AT THE, WHEN YOU GET DOING GOOD TO GET ONE OR TWO, YOU HAD, UH, 12 ADDITIONAL 12 CALL IN.
HOW MANY, HOW MANY RED FLAGS DO YOU HAVE TO HAVE BEFORE YOU SAY NO, DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
NOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT INSTRUCTIONS, MR. UH, WHAT, UH, WHAT INSTRUCTIONS MS, UH, SANDOVAL GAVE HERE, BUT, UH, IF, IF I DIDN'T KNOW ANY BETTER, I'D JUST SAY SHE WAS JUST TRYING TO WEAR DOWN THE OPPOSITION.
YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT'S A FAVOR TACTIC.
I'D SAY, UH, NO, DO NOT DELAY THIS.
JUST, UH, HAVE THE COURAGE TO MR. COURAGE TO, UH, SAY NO FOR MS. SANDOVAL.
UH, LIKE I SAY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT SHE WANTED, BUT, UH,
CATHERINE MANA, FOLLOWED BY PHILLIP MANA.
PHILLIP, YOU HAVE SIX MINUTES.
GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MAYOR.
MY NAME IS PHILIP MANNA AND I'M THE PRESIDENT OF ALAMO FARMSTEADS BABCOCK ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
OUR COMMUNITY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1935 AND ANNEX BY THE CITY IN 1973, AND WAS RECOGNIZED AS A NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE U D C IN 1993.
LIKE MANY OF THE OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS IN SAN ANTONIO, WE ARE A VOLUNTARY NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS GENERALLY DON'T HAVE BUDGETS FOR LAWYERS AND LOBBYISTS, BUT POOL THE EFFORTS OTHER CITIZENS AND RELY ON THE HELP OF COMMUNITY PLANS, CITY STAFF, COMMISSIONS, AND YOU, THE CITY COUNCIL TO PROTECT THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF OUR COMMUNITIES.
THIS IS A NONSTOP EFFORT OF YOUR CITIZENS AS THEY WORK FOR THE SO-CALLED SECOND JOB AS A NEIGHBORHOOD VOLUNTEER, INCLUDING LOTS OF COORDINATION WITH BUSINESSES WHO WANT TO PARTNER WITH THEIR COMMUNITIES.
UNFORTUNATELY, UH, THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT EFFORTS ALSO REQUIRED WHEN DEALING WITH BUSINESSES SEEKING TO PROFIT AT THE DETRIMENT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
SINCE FEBRUARY, THIS CASE HAS ACTUALLY BEEN CONTINUED FIVE TIMES, UH, ONCE WITHIN THE ZONING COMMISSION, AND FOUR TIMES NOW WITH CITY COUNCIL.
NONE OF THESE CONTINUANCES WERE AT THE COMMUNITY'S BEHALF FOR THE COUNCIL MEETINGS.
ALL THE CONTINUANCE NOTIFICATIONS UNFORTUNATELY OCCURRED 24 TO 50 HOURS BEFORE THE MEETING, SO THIS IS KIND OF EXTREMELY INCONVENIENT FOR THE COMMUNITIES THEMSELVES.
UM, GIVEN THE STRONG COMMUNITY OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST FOR THE COMMERCIAL EXPANSION OF THIS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, AND THE DEMONSTRATION, UH, THAT THE REQUEST WAS UNNECESSARY DURING THE ZONING COMMISSION, UH, THE ZONING HEARING, UH, WE WERE RELATED THAT THE CITY STAFF AND THE ZONING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED DENIAL, CITING THAT THE PROPOSED INTENSITY WAS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS LOCATION IN THE MIDDLE OF A BLOCK ON A 23 FOOT WIDE STREET IN THE MIDDLE OF A LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT.
DURING THE HEARING STAFF, DURING THE HEARING STAFF REMINDED THE COMMISSION THAT THIS REQUEST IS DISCRETIONARY BY CITY COUNCIL.
OKAY? AND, UM, REVIEWING ALL CITY ZONING ASSISTED LIVING REQUESTS FOR EXPANSION SINCE 2013, WE COULD NOT FIND ANY OTHER CASE APPROVED BY COUNSEL WHEN STAFF AND ZONING HAD RECOMMENDED DENIAL AND THERE WAS STRONG COMMUNITY OPPOSITION.
TO BE HONEST, WE WERE GOBSMACKED DURING OUR FOLLOW-UP MEETING WITH THE ZONING, UH, AFTER THE ZONING HEARING WITH THE D SEVEN OFFICE.
AS WE WERE ASKED TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE APPLICANT, WE HAVE TRIED NEGOTIATING, BUT THEY HAVE NOT ACCEPTED ANY DIALOGUE REGARDING REDUCING THE REQUESTED DENSITY AND MINIMIZING THE PAR SIZE OF THE PARKING LOT.
THERE IS SIGNIFICANT EFFORT REQUIRED BY A COMMUNITY WHEN ATTENDING A CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
MUCH OF THE COORDINATION REQUIRES ADVANCED NOTICE IN PLANNING, GIVEN THAT MANY IN THE COMMUNITY WORK, THEY HAD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR TIME OFF.
SOME OF THOSE WHO ARE WORKING ACTUALLY MANAGE, FACIL, MANAGE AND FACILITATE MEETINGS.
SO THIS IMPACT EXTENDS BEYOND JUST THE COMMUNITY.
AND THIS MEETING HERE, MANY IN THE COMMUNITY HAVE TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR CHILDCARE.
AND AS WE HAVE MANY SENIORS, WE HAVE TO MAKE LOTS OF ARRANGEMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION,
[00:20:01]
AS MANY OF THEM DON'T DRIVE ANYMORE.WE HAVE MEMBERS CHANGING VACATION PLANS.
WE HAVE MEMBERS WHO ARE RESCHEDULING MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS, UH, MADE WEEKS OR MONTHS PRIOR.
UM, I'M THE PRIMARY CAREGIVER FOR MY FATHER, AND WE ACTUALLY HAD TO MAKE, I HAD TO MAKE CHANGES TO HIS SCHEDULE.
I MADE ONE TODAY SO I COULD BE AT THIS MEETING, UM, TAKES TO RAMP UP THIS MEETING.
IT'S EVEN A LOT MORE TO RAMP DOWN AFTER A CASE GETS CONTINUED, WE HAVE TO REACH OUT AND SHUT DOWN THIS WHOLE MOTION THAT'S GOING ON, UH, WITH, WITH THE COMMUNITY.
AND SO IT'S, IT'S CONFUSING AND, AND UPSETTING.
SO I'M GETTING A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM MY COMMUNITY, UH, JUST ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THIS, THESE CONTINUANCES.
UM, WE LOOK FORWARD TO THIS BEING COMPLETED.
SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
ALRIGHT, THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND.
A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR CONTINUANCE OF ITEM 15 TO AUGUST 18TH.
ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE.
WE'LL MOVE NOW TO OUR INDIVIDUAL ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION.
WE'LL BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER THREE.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE IS A REZONING FROM R FOUR TO R FOUR CD WITH A CONDITION OF USE FOR THREE DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 1108 CENTER STREET.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
57 NOTICES MAILED 14 IN FAVOR, ONE OPPOSED JEFFERSON HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT.
WE HAVE TWO CITIZENS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER THREE.
MR. FINGER, YOU'D BE FOLLOWED BY CHRISTINA ALANISE.
WELL, MARIN NURENBERG, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR ILLUSTRIOUS SAN ANTONIO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RECORD.
MY NAME IS JACK M FINGER, I NUMBER THREE.
UM, MR. MCKEE RODRIGUEZ, THIS IS, UH, IN YOUR DISTRICT HERE.
AND WHAT IS IT? WELL, IT'S ABOUT, UH, THE IDEA OF PLACING THREE LITTLE, WELL, MAYBE NOT SO LITTLE DWELLING UNITS INTO ONE LOT HERE.
UM, THE, UH, ZONING STAFF THOUGHT THIS WAS A BAD IDEA AND LOOKING AT THE BACKUP DOCUMENTS ON IT, THEY, THEY, THEY HAD SOME GOOD REASONS FOR IT.
THEY SAID IT WAS TOO DENSE, TOO DENSE TO BE, OR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENCES THERE.
NOW THIS IS OVER ON, UH, NORTH CENTER STREET.
UH, PLEASE BEAR IN MIND, SIR, THEY, UH, THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE WHO DO CARE ABOUT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND WHEN THEY SEE SOMETHING THAT IS COMPLETELY INCONSISTENT, THEY, THEY SAY, NO, WE DON'T WANT THIS.
SO, AND, AND THESE, THAT'S WHAT THE ZONING STAFF SUGGESTED ANYWAY THERE.
SO, UH, WHY NOT, UM, SIMPLY SAY NO TO THIS THING, UH, SO THAT THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA DON'T HAVE TO, UH, PUT UP WITH IT FOR THE REST OF THE TIME THAT THEY LIVE IN THAT AREA.
CHRISTINA ESE
ALRIGHT, THIS IS, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER MCKEE RODRIGUEZ.
DID YOU NEED TO SAY SOMETHING? NO, SIR.
JUST HERE IN CASE ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS.
UM, SO MY OFFICE WAS IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE APPLICANT AND ASKED THEM TO CANVAS THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND INFORM THE COMMUNITY OF WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO AND HOPEFULLY RECEIVE SUPPORT.
AND THE APPLICANT DID WALK THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WAS ABLE TO GET A PETITION WITH 20 SIGNATURES IN SUPPORT, INCLUDING THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT.
UM, I VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THE EFFORTS OF THE APPLICANT AND THE COMMUNITY'S FEEDBACK, AND SO I WILL DEFER TO THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, AND SO I MOVED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
ALL RIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER THREE.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE PLEASE.
COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL MEMBER BRAVO.
MOTION CARRIES ITEMS 10 AND 11, ITEMS 10 AND 11 AMENDING THE KELLY SOUTH
[00:25:01]
SAN PUEBLO COMMUNITY PLAN FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO COMMUNITY, COMMERCIAL FROM R SIX AND C THREE TO C TWO CD WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR ANIMAL AND PET SERVICES, OUTDOOR TRAINING, BOARDING RUNS, PENS, PRODUCTS PERMITTED, LOCATED AT EIGHT 19 NEW LAREDO HIGHWAY.STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL PLANNING AND ZONING.
COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
NOTICES MAILED ONE IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED.
ALL RIGHT, WE'VE GOT ONE CITIZEN ON ITEMS 10 AND 11 JACK FINGER DO WELL.
MAYOR NURNBERG, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR COUNCIL.
FINGER AND, UH, THIS IS IN MS, UH, ROCHA, GARCIA'S DISTRICT HERE.
UM, THE REASON THESE HAVE SOME BIG DEFECTS, BIG RED FLAGS IS BECAUSE, WELL, THE PLANNING, UH, DEPARTMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ZONING DEPARTMENT, THEIR STAFFS, BOTH OF THEM SAID NO TO THIS THING.
WHY? WELL, BECAUSE QUOTE, IT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING, UH, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AREA THERE.
IF YOU LOOK IN FACT, I, I DUNNO IF YOU NOTICED MS. RO GARCIA, BUT THE MAP THAT WAS DISPLAYED JUST A MOMENT AGO, IF YOU LOOKED IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THIS PROPOSAL RIGHT HERE, IT'S HUGGING.
IT'S HUGGING RIGHT NEXT TO THE, UH, THOSE, THOSE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES.
AND THEY, LIKE I SAY, THEY'RE THE ONES THAT HAVE TO LIVE WITH THIS, UH, WELL, ANIMAL AND PET SERVICE FACILITY HERE.
UH, I SAY, UH, JUST, UH, SAY, SAY NO TO THIS THING ONCE AND FOR ALL AND, AND, AND TELL 'EM NO.
YOU, YOU'RE OR YOU REPRESENTING YOUR CITIZENS, UH, SAY THEY DESERVE BETTER THAN TO HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THAT.
I JUST WANNA CLARIFY, I HAVE STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL FOR BOTH 10 11, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
UM, MAYOR, I MOVE TO APPROVE THIS.
ALL RIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER THREE AND ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.
MS. MAYOR, IT WAS ACTUALLY ITEM 10 AND 11.
APOLOGIZE, MOTION AND SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEMS 10 AND 11.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE.
AGENDA ITEM 18 IS A REZONING FROM PUD C TWO TO C TWO S WITH A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR A HOTEL LOCATED AT 42 42.
STAFF AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.
EIGHT FOOT SOLID SCREEN FENCING ALONG THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY LINE, DOWNWARD FACING LIGHTING MAX HEIGHT LIMIT OF FIVE STORIES 2 215 NOTICES WERE MAILED.
FOUR IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED.
MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITIONS AS STATED, THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM 18 WITH CONDITIONS AS STATED.
ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE PLEASE VOTE.
COUNCILMAN BRA COUNCILMAN BRAVO.
MOTION CARRIES ITEM 22, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 22 IS A REZONING FROM C TWO AND R SIX TO C TWO AND M F 18 LOCATED AT 15,000 7 0 2 NACODOCHES ROAD.
STAFF AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
10 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED.
COUNCIL MEMBER PERRY, SAME THING HERE.
MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE SITE PLAN ATTACHED FOR THE RECORD.
ALL RIGHT, THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER 22.
ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE.
[00:30:01]
BALANCE OF OUR ZONING AGENDA TODAY.TIME IS 2:40 PM ON THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE, 2022.