[00:00:05]
THERE WILL BE DEDICATED TIMES FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS AT THE BEGINNING AND OF EACH MEETING ARE ENCOURAGED.
I COMMENT PEREZ DAVID PRESENT KILI.
JANE NELSON, PRESENTER, JOEL SOLI, BARBARA TAPIA, PRESENTE AND WENER PRESENTE.
PRESENTE LA ANTONIO DE RAMIREZ.
[00:18:19]
IN[00:18:19]
HOUSTON.[00:22:56]
SEPARATE[00:23:40]
THE RESTAURANT HERE.[00:26:31]
M C[00:32:56]
FORWARD.[00:35:23]
IS ROBERT TAPIO AMENDMENT TO THE FERNANDEZ.THE BUILDING STANDARDS, UH, SAN ANTONIO PARK MAINTENANCE CODE COMMITTEE, UH, HAS RECESS AND THEY NOW, WE NOW RECONVENED AN OPEN SESSION.
THE WHOLE OFFICIAL ACTION TAKEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION, UH, CHAIR WILL YIELD TO TAYLOR.
I WOULD MAKE MOTION TO RESEND THE LAST VOTE.
I SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE.
AND SECOND TO AMEND TO RESEND, EXCUSE ME,
[00:40:01]
THE LAST VOTE.ANY DISCUSSION OF MOTION IF NO DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
THOSE OPPOSED SAY THE LAST VOTE IS RESCINDED.
SO ACCORDINGLY, UH, DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER TWO OR A CHANGE? MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER TWO? MR. CHAIR? UH, THIS IS, UH, THE, UH, AGENDA LIST OF PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE END OF TODAY'S SESSION.
[00:45:42]
NO.AND GARCIA PROFESSIONAL TEXAS RIO GRANDE.
[00:50:29]
AND CONTRAST THE,[00:57:51]
I TURN IT OVER TO LEGAL.I, I WANNA REFER TO YOU, UH, IN YOUR OWN WRITING HERE THAT YOU, UH, FISCAL, UH, NO PROBLEM.
[01:04:29]
SO SAY THAT STATE YOUR NAME AND VERIFY IN.[01:09:12]
I SEEN[01:11:12]
IS THE, THE ASSUMPTION THAT ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ARE OFF, THE INDIVIDUALS IN PARTICULAR.MY NAME IS ANTONIO AND TEXAS RIO
[01:18:03]
PROFESSION.[01:31:47]
OKAY.[01:33:12]
AT[01:33:12]
THIS,[01:40:58]
UH,[01:40:58]
AT THE LAST MEETING, AGAIN, JUSTAND WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS ADD AT THE LAST KNOWN MAIL ADDRESS, UH, REASON BEING THAT, UH, THERE'S A DISTINCTION, UH, BETWEEN MAIL ADDRESS AND, UH, POST OFFICE BOX.
AND, UH, THE LAST MEETING, HAVE YOU REMINDED ME, JEREMY? THAT'S CORRECT.
THE RECOMMENDATION, AT LEAST, YOU RECOMMENDING EXACTLY THAT EMAIL MAILING ADDRESS TO BETWEEN CORRECTLY? YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
UH, SAM MENTIONED THAT AND DISCUSSED THAT LAST WEEK, CLOSE OFF HIS BOX, HE WAS RECOGNIZED LEGALLY CORRECT.
CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY? SORRY ABOUT THAT, BUT YES, THAT IS CORRECT.
THE COMMENT LAST WEEK WAS THAT THE CHAIR WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
[01:51:00]
ASSISTANT[01:51:20]
CHAIR WOULD RECOMMEND MENTIONED EARLIER, UH, JURISDICTION[01:56:32]
PARA M C PARA S A P M C I.WELL, SHE WAS COMING ON 19TH AND SHE MADE, MADE A MOTION THAT ALLOW TO REPRESEN BECAUSE THE MOTION IS TO ACCEPT 20 EIGHTEENS, UH, AS IS ON 16.
WHAT WERE YOU FINDING DISTURBING ABOUT ITS CURRENT, WRITTEN AS 2018 HAS? WELL, IN THIS CASE IT JUST REFERS TO THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD, UM, AND IT REFERS TO A DIFFERENT, UH, CHAPTER IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
UM, SO WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR IS JUST MORE TIME TO REVIEW 19, BECAUSE IT WAS CONCERNING TO, TO ME, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S SOME TYPE OF STATE, UM, LEGISLATION THAT PROHIBITS THE ENACTING THIS INTO OUR SS A P AND C, BUT I WOULD JUST LIKE SOME MORE TIME TO LOOK AT IT AND SEE, UM, IF THERE'S ANY WAY THAT WE CAN AMEND THE LANGUAGE TO WHERE IT DOESN'T, UH, VIOLATE STATE LEGISLATURE.
[02:00:03]
YEAH, LEMME UH, UH, I THINK THERE MIGHT BE SOME CONFUSION AS TO THIS PROVISION AND THE, WHEN YOU'RE ISSUED A NOTICE, WHICH IS YOU, UH, HAVE, UM, A VIOLATION OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.THIS IS BASICALLY A FRIENDLY NOTICE, 10 DAYS TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE.
ONE, IF THE PROPERTY OWNER DISAGREES THAT THERE IS A VIOLATION, THEY CAN APPEAL THE NOTICE TO THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD.
THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD DETERMINATION IS WHETHER TO UPHOLD, UH, LET'S SAY IT WAS FOR OUTSIDE PLACEMENT AND DEAD TREES.
THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD WILL HEAR EVIDENCE FROM THE CODE OFFICER.
THEN THEY'LL HEAR EVIDENCE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER AS TO WHY THERE IS NO VIOLATION.
THE DECISION THAT IS RENDERED BY THE BOARD IS WHETHER TO UPHOLD THE DETERMINATION THAT THERE IS A VIOLATION AND TO ALLOW THE 10 DAYS TO PROCEED.
OR THE BOARD CAN SAY, BASED ON WHAT WAS PRESENTED, UH, WE DO NOT SEE ANY DEAD TREES.
WE DO NOT SEE ANY OUTSIDE PLACEMENT.
SO WE'RE GOING TO REVERSE THAT DETERMINATION.
IT'S, THAT'S THE APPEAL OF JUST THE NOTICE BECAUSE, UH, AS DANNY HAD MENTIONED EARLIER, A NOTICE IS ISSUED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE TIME TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE BEFORE FURTHER ACTION IS TAKEN EITHER BY ISSUING A CRIMINAL CITATION, ISSUING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION, OR BRINGING THE SS A P M C VIOLATION TO THE BUILDING STANDARDS FOR IF THE SS A P M C.
SO, UH, A PROPERTY OWNER HAD, THE PROPERTY OWNER, UH, WAS GIVEN 10 DAYS.
UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER, UH, ASKS, UH, THEY AGREE THERE'S A VIOLATION, CAN WE HAVE MORE TIME, NOT HAVE MORE TIME TO, GENERALLY THAT TIME IS GRANTED, THEN THE ISSUE IS RESOLVED.
THE PROPERTY OWNER CAN SAY, UH, THERE IS NO VIOLATION AND I DON'T HAVE TO REPAIR ANYTHING.
UH, THERE'S NOT A SORORITY, I'M NOT GONNA REPAIR IT.
THE CODE OFFICER CAN BRING THAT VIOLATION, SAPC VIOLATION FOR THE LEAKING SEWER LINE TO THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD.
THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD WOULD HEAR THE CASE.
AGAIN, THE TESTIMONY FROM OFFICER TESTIMONY FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, UH, ANY OTHER PERSON WHO WANTS TO BE HEARD.
THEN THE BS P MAKES THE DECISION ISSUES OF RULING THAT YES, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF SUCH, SUCH AND SUCH CODE ON THIS, UH, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDER TO ABATE THE SEWAGE WEEK IN 30 DAYS, 45 DAYS.
THAT ORDER CAN BE APPEALED TO DISTRICT COURT.
SO THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD IS THE APPELLATE AND THE IN SAND REPORTS IN
[02:05:33]
VIOLATION IS, UM, OBLIGATED IN PARTICULAR.IS THERE A SPECIFIC PLACE? A SPECIFIC,
[02:10:02]
YES.[02:17:00]
AND[02:25:14]
OH,[02:25:14]
THIS CALLED, NO, WE.