* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:02] DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022. [ Roll Call  ] WE'LL CALL OUR ZONING SESSION ORDER. MADAM CLERK, COULD YOU READ THE ROLE? COUNCIL MEMBER BRAVO HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER MCKEE RODRIGUEZ. PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER VILLAGRA. HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER RJA GARCIA. HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER CASTILLO. HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER CAB HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER SANDOVAL. COUNCILMAN . COUNCIL MEMBER COURAGE PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER PERRY. HERE. MAYOR NIERENBERG. HERE. MAYOR. WE HAVE A QUORUM. ALRIGHT, UH, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. [Public Hearing and Consideration of the following Adoption and Amendments of the Neighborhood, Community and Perimeter Plans as Components of the Master Plan and Zoning Cases. Plan amendments and Zoning cases presented by Roderick Sanchez, Assistant City Manager; Michael Shannon, Director, Development Services unless otherwise noted.  ] I AM GOING TO READ SOME ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 20TH AS WELL AS, UH, ITEMS THAT WILL BE, UM, CONSIDERED ON CONSENT TODAY. AND THEN I'LL ASK MY COLLEAGUES IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER ITEMS TO PULL FROM EITHER OF THOSE LISTS TO HEAR INDIVIDUALLY. THE CONSENT ZONING ITEMS TODAY ARE ITEMS 2, 3, 7 AND 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 25, 26, 27, AND 31. I HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONTINUED TO I OCTOBER 20TH, ITEMS 1, 18, 20 AND 21, 22, AND 23, 24, 30 AND 32. APART FROM THOSE ITEMS, ARE THERE ANY THAT FROM, EXCUSE ME, OF THOSE ITEMS, ARE THERE ANY THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HEAR INDIVIDUALLY? IF SO, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE, LET ME ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THOSE ITEMS TO CONTINUE TO OCTOBER 20TH ITEMS 1 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 30 AND 32. SO MOVED SECOND. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR CONTINUING THOSE ITEMS TO OCTOBER 20TH. UH, WE DO HAVE A FEW FOLKS WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM 32 THAT WILL BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 20TH, SO IT'S NOT GONNA BE HEARD TODAY. I'M GONNA GIVE FOLKS WHO DID SIGN UP FOR ITEM 32, A CHANCE TO JUST LET ME KNOW IF THEY'D LIKE TO WAIVE THEIR TIME OR THEY WELCOME TO TAKE IT NOW. WADE ROSCOE. OKAY. JERRY WONG HERE. UH, MR. WONG, AGAIN, THIS ITEM'S NOT GONNA BE HEARD UNTIL OCTOBER 20TH. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TODAY OR JUST WAIT? I'LL WAIT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UH, ROBERT MCKINNEY. OKAY. ANA ROSCOE. THANK YOU. NATHAN GRAVY. I'LL BE . THANK YOU. SHERRY SEIDENBERG AND MARK SEIDENBERG. OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALRIGHT, UH, LET ME NOW MOVE TO COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON THOSE ITEMS. MOVING TO OCTOBER 20TH. IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON THE ITEMS TO CONTINUE TO OCTOBER 20TH? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, THE ITEMS I WILL LIST NOW ARE GOING TO BE HEARD, UH, ON CONSENT 2, 3 7 8 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 25, 26, 27, AND 31. THERE ARE A FEW FOLKS WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT WILL REMAIN ON CONSENT. I'LL CALL MAYOR, COULD I JUST INTERVENE? I, I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY I NO LONGER WANT TO PULL ITEM NUMBER FOUR FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. SO LET ME ADD ITEM FOUR BACK TO THE CONSENT AGENDA AND I'VE READ ALL THOSE. WE'LL ADD ITEM FOUR. LET ME ENTERTAIN A MOTION NOW FOR THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. ALRIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL. THE CONSENT ZONING AGENDA. LET ME CALL FOLKS WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT ARE REMAINING ON CONSENT. WE WILL START WITH NATHAN GRAVY ON ITEM 25. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. CAN YOU HEAR ME WELL? OKAY. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. MY NAME IS NATHAN GRAVY. I'M A TECHNICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE GREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE HERE IN SAN ANTONIO. I LIKE TO SAY I'M NEW-ISH 'CAUSE I STARTED HERE IN JANUARY, SO STILL GETTING FAMILIAR WITH SAN ANTONIO BACK, UM, ON BEHALF OF GREATER EDWARD EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE AND OUR MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS, I'M HERE TO VOICE CONCERNS REGARDING THE SLATED IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMIT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. [00:05:01] GEE UNDERSTANDS THAT SAUCES HAS DESIGNATED THIS DEVELOPMENT AS A CATEGORY TWO RATING WHEN IMPLEMENTING THE POLLUTION PREVENTION CRITERIA FOUND WITHIN THE SAN ANTONIO UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. HOWEVER, THE ANTICIPATED UPZONING OF THIS REGULATED ACTIVITY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL ALLOWS FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM PERUS COVERT LIMIT INCREASING THAT LIMIT FROM A 30% TO 65%. GEE UNDERSTANDS THAT LAND USES MIGHT CHANGE AS AREA AREAS BECOME MORE URBANIZED. HOWEVER, WE STRONG, WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE INCREASING OF THIS IMPERVIOUS COVERT LIMIT THAT ARE TIED TO THESE LAND USES. WE REQUEST THAT THE ZONING CHANGE ONLY BE APPROVED WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THE IMPERVIOUS COVERT LIMIT ON THE SITE NOT EXCEED THE PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED 30%. WE ALSO ENCOURAGE COUNSEL TO INVESTATE INVESTIGATE OUR CURRENT WATER QUALITY ORDINANCES AND IMPLEMENT IN PREVIOUS COVER LIMIT THAT DO NOT PROMOTE THE INCREASE OF THE SAID LIMITS, UH, DUE TO UPZONING, UM, WITH SITUATIONS THAT YOU'RE PRES PRESENTED WITH TODAY. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU MR. GRAVY. AND I THINK THAT IS EVERYONE WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT ARE IN CONSENT. SO LET ME GO RIGHT INTO COUNSEL DISCUSSION NOW, AND IF FOLKS WOULD QUEUE UP, ACTUALLY JUST SHOW ME A HAND IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCIL MEMBER PIA. THANK YOU. UH, WITH REGARDS TO ITEM 26 AND 27, THIS IS THE, UH, 2200 BLOCK CRES, THE BELLA. UM, I, I'D LIKE TO THANK THE, UH, THE H O A FOR BEING SO INVOLVED AND FOR WORKING A LOT, UH, ON, I KNOW HOW MANY HOURS YOU GUYS PUT INTO THIS. I KNOW THAT, UM, YOU, I'VE NEVER SEEN AN H O A REACH OUT TO IN A MORE DELIBERATE WAY TO, TO NEIGHBORS THE WAY THAT YOU GUYS HAVE. UH, I'M IMPRESSED, REALLY. AND, UH, NOT JUST BY YOU GUYS, BUT BY YOUR, BY YOUR ADVISORS. UH, THANK YOU TO THE, UH, TO THE NEW PROPERTY OWNER AND THE DEVELOPER. UM, YOU GUYS HAVE AGREED TO DO STRIPING, UH, ON MUCH NEEDED STRIPING FOR OUR BIKE LANES, UH, AND OUR STREET ON CRESS BELLA. THAT'S A REALLY BIG DEAL. AND, UM, ADDITIONALLY, YOU'VE, UM, YOU'VE COMMITTED, COMMITTED A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY IN AND AROUND THE NEIGHBORHOODS. AND SO, UM, THAT DOES NOT GO UNNOTICED AND I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. AND SO WITH THAT, I, I APPRECIATE, UM, MY COUNCIL COLLEAGUES, UM, SUPPORTING THIS AND, UM, I'M, I'M VERY IMPRESSED. ONE THING IS WE JUST HEARD FROM THIS GENTLEMAN REGARDING SAS. I I WILL POINT OUT, UM, THAT SAS DID APPROVE IT AND WE HAVE VISITED WITH FRIENDS OF FRIEDRICH, UH, AND EVERYBODY WHO'S LOOKED AT THIS PROJECT, UM, HAS EITHER NO OPPOSITION OR IS ENTHUSIASTICALLY IN SUPPORT. SO THANKS GUYS. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER PIAS, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE CONSENT ZONING AGENDA? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, WE'RE GONNA GO NOW TO THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS. I'M GONNA JUST TAKE A POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE ACTUALLY, UH, AND RECOGNIZE SOMEONE WHO'S IN OUR CHAMBERS. EMILIA SEVA. HELLO SIR. UM, LONGTIME DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO. ABOUT 25 YEARS AGO I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOLUNTEER AS A CITIZEN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. WE CREATED A, A PUBLIC SERVICE OR PUBLIC ACCESS TELEVISION ABOUT HOW THE SAN, HOW THE CITY IS CREATED, HOW IT'S BUILT. AND THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AT THE TIME WAS A EMIL. UH, MR. EVAAS, WELCOME BACK TO CITY HALL. THANK YOU RESIDENT. IT'S GREAT TO SEE YOU AND A VALUED MEMBER OF DISTRICTS, UH, CONSTITUENT OF DISTRICT SIX. THANK YOU. NO. ALRIGHT. OH SHOOT. OKAY. UM, IS RICHARD GONZALEZ HERE? MR. GONZALEZ, I FAILED TO CALL YOU, UH, ON YOUR ITEM THAT WAS ON CONSENT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE YOUR TIME NOW? THE AREA AROUND MY HOME AT 4 25 EAST CRAIG IS BEING REZONED FOR MULTIPLE USE. I'M NOT SURE WHAT EFFECT IT'S GONNA HAVE ON MY RESIDENCE THERE. AND I WAS JUST WONDERING IF YOU COULD TELL ME WHAT IS PLANNED FOR THE AREA. I KNOW IT CAN BE VARIOUS THINGS, BUT, UH, I'D JUST LIKE TO KNOW IF MY NEIGHBORHOOD IS GONNA GO DOWN OR UP WITH THE REZONING SINCE IT HAS BEEN RESIDENTIAL FOR SO MANY YEARS. WE CAN HAVE A STAFF VISIT WITH YOU, MR. GONZALEZ. THAT WOULD BE FINE. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE WITH INDIVIDUAL ITEMS NOW STARTING WITH ITEMS FIVE AND SIX. GOOD AFTERNOON. AGENDA ITEM FIVE AND SIX, AMENDING THE NEAR NORTHWEST COMMUNITY PLAN FROM URBAN [00:10:01] LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FROM R FIVE CD WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO C TWO CD WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONSTRUCTION TRADES CONTRACTOR LOCATED AT 2 32 SHERWOOD DRIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING COMMISSION. RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS, HOURS OF OPERATION MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 8:00 AM TO 6:00 PM AND SATURDAY FROM 9:00 AM TO 3:00 PM NO TEMPORARY SIGNAGE, WIND WAIVERS, PENANT, SNIPE OR BANDIT SIGNS, NO OUTSIDE STORAGE, DOWNWARD FACING LIGHTING AND EIGHT FOOT SOLID SCREEN FENCE ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND OR USES 25 NOTICES MAILED TO IN FAVOR. ZERO OPPOSED LOS ANGELES HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HAS NO OBJECTION. COUNCIL MEMBER BRAVO. UH, I'D LIKE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO OCTOBER 20TH. OKAY. UM, A MOTION IS SECOND TO CONTINUE ITEMS FIVE AND SIX TO OCTOBER 20TH. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HOLD ON. I, I APOLOGIZE. UM, THIS IS, UH, I WAS LOOKING AT THE OTHER ONE. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS. THANK YOU SIR. SORRY. MM-HMM. ITEM FIVE AND SIX. YES. YES. THANK YOU. FIVE AND SIX. OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEMS FIVE AND SIX WITH CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? A MOTION BY BRAVO, SECOND BY CASTILLO, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. GO TO ITEMS. ITEM NINE, EXCUSE ME. AGENDA ITEM NINE IS A REZONING FROM C TWO AND A TO C TWO CD I D Z WITH ADDITIONAL USE FOR BAR AND OR TAVERN LOCATED AT 1602 NORTH MAIN AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. NO LIVE OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT, FOOD, TRUCK HOURS OF OPERATION WILL NOT EXTEND PAST THE FOLLOWING TIMES. MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY. 12:00 AM THROUGH 12 THROUGH 12:00 AM FRIDAY AND SATURDAY, 1:00 AM AND SUNDAY THROUGH 11:00 PM 23 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED. TOBIN HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT. COUNCIL MEMBER BRAVO. MOTION TO APPROVE AND CONDITIONS. ALL RIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM NINE WITH CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 15, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 15 IS A REZONING FROM MF 33 TO I D Z WITH USES PERMITTED IN C TWO COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS AND MF 33 MULTIFAMILY DISTRICTS LOCATED AT 501 SOUTH FLORIDA STREET, 5 0 3 503 SOUTH FLORIDA STREET AND 1 0 8 BEATRICE AVENUE. STAFF AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING THE REQUEST TO INCLUDE NA NON-ALCOHOL SALES WITH THE PROPOSED C TWO USES AND HAS SUBMITTED A REVISED SITE. PLAN. 36. NOTICES MAILED TWO IN FAVOR. SEVEN OPPOSED KNOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THERE ARE THREE IN FAVOR OUTSIDE OF THE 200 FOOT BOUNDARY AND ST. LEO'S ASSOCIATION OUTSIDE THE 200 FOOT BOUNDARY IS OPPOSED. WE HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM 15, UH, PHOENIX BIRD. UM, NOT NECESSARY, UH, HAVE ANY OKAY. THE APPLICANT. OKAY, MR. BIRDWELL, UM, WAIVING YOUR TIME, BUT WE KNOW YOU'RE THERE IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. UH, THIS IS, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER VIRON. THANK YOU. WE CONTINUED THIS CASE TWICE PREVIOUSLY TO ALLOW FOR MORE DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE RECENTLY FORMED ST. LEO'S NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IN THIS AREA. I WANNA THANK BOTH THE APPLICANT AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FOR CONTACTING MY OFFICE AND PROVIDING US WITH FEEDBACK ON WHAT ACTIVITY THEY'RE CURRENTLY SEEING ON THIS PART OF SOUTH FLOSS. I KNOW THE APPLICANT DID ATTEND THEIR GENERAL MEETING LAST MONTH AND PRESENTED THEIR PROPOSALS, PROPOSED PLANS TO THE NA THERE. UH, BECAUSE THIS IS A NEWLY FORMED NA I, THE THE GRASP OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING, UM, DIDN'T SEEM TO, UM, IT DIDN'T SEEM TO TO GRASP WHAT WAS HAPPENING AND HOPEFULLY MOVING FORWARD I ENCOURAGE BOTH SIDES TO REMAIN IN COMMUNICATION THROUGHOUT THE PERMITTING PROCESS. UH, SOUTH FLORES IS A BUSY NORTH SOUTH COMMERCIAL [00:15:01] CORRIDOR THAT CONNECTS DOWNTOWN SAN ANTONIO TO THE SOUTH SIDE. WE WANNA ENSURE THAT BUSINESSES ALONG THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CAN PROVIDE FAMILY-ORIENTED GOODS AND SERVICES THAT LOCAL AREA RESIDENTS CAN BENEFIT FROM. THE I E D Z TWO ZONING REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT MUST ADHERE TO A SITE PLAN WHICH THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING TODAY TO INCLUDE A NON-ALCOHOL NA RESTRICTION WITH THE PROPOSED C TWO PURSES C TWO USES. LASTLY, THE ZONING ON THIS BLOCK IS ZONED MF 33, BUT THESE ARE PRIMARILY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE GROUND SIMILAR TO, TO WHAT OTHER PARTS WE SEE IN THE INNER CITY. SO THE WHOLE BLOCK AT THIS POINT NEEDS TO BE ANALYZED. AND THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR BEGINNING TO, UM, TO RIGHT ZONE THIS. UM, I KNOW THAT MY OFFICE STAFF HAS REACHED OUT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, UH, SO WE CAN FURTHER REVIEW THIS UNDER ESSAY TOMORROW AS PART OF THE SOUTH AREA COMMUNITY PLAN. UM, AND THOSE MEETINGS HAVE STARTED TAKING PLACE. SO AT THIS TIME I WILL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE FOLLOWING MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED. SECOND. ALL RIGHT, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM 15 AS AMENDED. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 16, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 16 IS A REZONING FROM R SIX TO I D Z ONE WITH USES PERMITTED UP TO FIVE DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 2 37 CHICKERING AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDS AN AISLE WITH AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION. ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. 45 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, EIGHT OPPOSED PASADENA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT. COUNCIL MEMBER VERAN, I WANNA THANK THE MEMBERS OF THE PASADENA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND FOR THE APPLICANT FOR YOUR COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS THAT RESULTED IN THE REVISED DENSITY FOR THIS PROPOSED INFILL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. I WANNA THANK MY ZONING COMMISSIONER CHARLES FUENTES FOR HIS WORK IN BRINGING ABOUT THIS COMPROMISE FROM SEVEN UNITS DOWN TO FIVE UNITS. SO AT THIS TIME I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER 16. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 17, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 17, REZONING UH, FROM M X D TO C TWO. GENERALLY LOCATED THE 12,000 BLOCK OF DUN UP ROAD. STAFF AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING TO ADD NA NON-ALCOHOL SALES TO THE REQUEST. SIX NOTICES MAILED TO IN FAVOR. ZERO OPPOSED AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. COUNCIL MEMBER VERAN, I WANNA THANK THE APPLICANT FOR AMENDING THEIR REQUEST AND INCLUDING THE NA RESTRICTION MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED. OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM 17 AS AMENDED. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL GO TO ITEM 28 AND 29 AMENDING THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN FROM REGIONAL CENTER TO MIXED USE CENTER FROM C THREE TO MF 65 SS WITH A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR UP TO 65 UNITS PER ACRE LOCATED AT 1827 AND 1903 NORTH LOOP 1604. STAFF SAWS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. SAWS RECOMMENDS 75% IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATIONS. 12 NOTICES MAILED ONE IN FAVOR. ZERO OPPOSED. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. WE HAVE ONE RESIDENT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM 29, NATHAN GLA. GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN, COUNSEL. UM, NATHAN VY. GOOD EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE TECHNICAL DIRECTOR. UH, ON BEHALF OF GIA, I'M JUST HERE TO VOICE CONCERNS REGARDING THE IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITS SLATED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. UH, GAE UNDERSTANDS AS SAUL HAS DESIGNATED THIS AS A CATEGORY ONE WHEN IMPLEMENTING THE POLLUTION PREVENTION CRITERIA FOUND WITHIN SAN ANTONIO U D C. UH, THIS CATEGORY LATE RATING ALLOWS A ZONING CASE TO BE EXEMPT FROM SAN ANTONIO WATER QUALITY ORDINANCES, UH, THAT WERE APPROVED BACK IN 19 FIVE IN RECOGNITION THAT THIS PROJECT HAS VESTED RIGHTS. UH, SO MY QUESTION MAINLY IS WHEN WILL OUR QUAL, WHEN WILL OUR WATER QUALITY ORDINANCES [00:20:01] BE FULLY UPHELD? AND HOW MANY MORE PROJECTS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM REGULATIONS THAT WERE PASSED ALMOST 27 YEARS AGO? WE APPRECIATE THAT SAS HAS RECOMMENDED A MAXIMUM 75% IN PREVIOUS COVER FOR THIS, UM, FOR THIS PROJECT SITE. HOWEVER, WE WOULD LOVE TO ENCOURAGE ZONING, CLASS ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF SIMILAR CLASSES TO FOLLOW TODAY'S WATER, CURRENT WATER QUALITY ORDINANCES, IMPLEMENTING A PREVIOUS COVER LIMIT THAT FOLLOWS THE SLATED REGULATED REGULATED ACTIVITY. IN THIS CASE, IT WOULD BE A MAXIMUM 50% IMPERVIOUS COVER SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT FISCAL CRITERIA FOR CATEGORY TWO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU MR. VY. COUNCIL MEMBER COURAGE. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. UH, CURRENTLY THE, UH, CURRENTLY THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY IS ALL ASPHALT. IT'S PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS. UH, WHAT WE PLAN ON BUILDING THERE WITH APARTMENTS IS HOPEFULLY GOING TO IMPROVE THE AMOUNT, UH, OR REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER. SO I MOVE TO APPROVE WITH THE IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATION AS RECOMMENDED BY SAAS. OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ITEMS 28 AND 29 WITH THE IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATIONS AS NOTED. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. THAT IS THE BALANCE OF OUR AGENDA TODAY. THE TIME IS 2:33 PM AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. HAVE A GOOD DAY. . * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.