* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:05] WELL, GOOD MORNING. IT'S UH, 9 0 1. AND, UH, WELCOME TO THE, UH, NOVEMBER THE, UH, AM EDITION OF THE PLANNING, UH, COMMISSION MEETING FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16TH, 2022. UH, CAN WE HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATIONS, PLEASE? GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU. CAN YOU PLEASE CONNECT THE ROLL CALL MS. CARILLO HAYNES. PRESENT. MR. PECK? MR. GARCIA? PRESENT? MS. SIEGEL? HERE. MR. LOPEZ? HERE. MS. MILAM? HERE. MS. LER? PRESENT. MR. ZUKI? MR. BUSANTE PRESENT. MR. ORIAN COUNCILMAN, COURAGE, PRESENT CHAIR, PROPHET PRESENT. A QUORUM IS PRESENT. THANK YOU. TODAY WE'LL HAVE TWO AGENDAS. UM, ALL ITEMS ON THE AGENDA ARE AVAILABLE, UH, FOR CONSENT WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF ITEMS THREE, FOUR, AND 13, WHICH ARE BEING PULLED FOR RECUSAL PURPOSES AND ITEMS 16 AND 18, UH, WHICH WE WILL HEAR INDIVIDUALLY. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT [ Public Comment] IS CORRECT. ALRIGHT. UH, WE DO HAVE, UH, ONE VOICEMAIL TO BE HEARD AND A COUPLE OF, UH, UH, PEOPLE TO SPEAK, SO LET'S HEAR THE VOICEMAIL PLEASE. YES, I'M LORRAINE CARDONA. I'M CALLING FOR THE, UH, CONFIRMED THE AMENDMENT CASE. UH, P A T OH 2 0 2 2 1 1 6 0 0 1 0 0. I AM IN FAVOR, UM, LORRAINE CARDONA, 1136 HAMMOND, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 10. I HOPE YOU GOT YOUR MESSAGE. WE GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. UM, PHILLIP MANA, UM, MR. MANO HAVE, UH, THREE MINUTES, IF YOU CAN JUST STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. HELLO. UH, THANK YOU. UM, ALSO, CURTIS BENNETT IS HERE AND HE'S GONNA GIMME THREE OF HIS MINUTES TOO, SO, UM, I'M PROBABLY NOT GONNA NEED ANY, NEED, ANY AMOUNT THAT TIME. SO, UM, SO HELLO. THANK YOU. UH, MY NAME IS PHILLIP MANNA AND I LIVE AT 9 5 2 5 ROCHELLE. I AM, UH, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ALAMO FARMSTEADS BABCOCK ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, AND I'M ALSO THE PLANNING CHAIRMAN PERSON FOR THE HENER LEON CREEK COMMUNITY PLAN. AND SO I'M GONNA BE SPEAKING SPECIFICALLY TO, UM, I, I GUESS THE, UH, BANDERA CORRIDOR PLAN HERE IS WHAT I'LL BE SPEAKING TO. AND SO, UM, SO I'M GONNA GO THROUGH A COUPLE SLIDES HERE AND KIND OF TALK ABOUT IT. SO, SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THE HEEDER LEON CREEK COMMUNITY PLAN SHARES, UH, THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF BANDERA. SO, SO CERTAINLY OUR COMMUNITY WAS CERTAINLY ENGAGED WITH IT, AND I'D LIKE TO THANK THE CITY FOR, UH, FOR THEIR PARTICIPATION. WE'LL BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS, BY THE WAY. SO, BUT THERE ARE SOME CAVEATS TO THAT. AND SO, UM, SO, UM, CAN YOU GO AHEAD AND BRING UP TO THE NEXT SLIDE? SO, UH, THIS WAS IN THE PREVIOUS DRAFT, AND SO IT LEFT OUT A PIECE OF THE, UH, A PIECE OF THE PUZZLE HERE THAT I THINK IS REALLY IMPORTANT. AND SO IT IS JUST TO SHOW THAT THE CORRIDOR ITSELF IS LINED ESSENTIALLY BY THE, BEHIND THE CORRIDOR WITH A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES. AND SO I THINK THAT'S REALLY AN IMPORTANT THING TO REMEMBER AS WE TAKE A LOOK, TAKE A LOOK AT DEVELOPING THIS AS A MIXED USE, UH, AREA, IS THAT ALL OF THESE, UH, MIXED USES WILL BE ABUTTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES. AND RIGHT NOW, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, THE U D C REALLY DOESN'T DO A LOT OF PROTECTION FOR THOSE. 'CAUSE THE, THE MIXED USE, UM, UM, ZONING PLANS REALLY DON'T EXIST YET. AND THOSE ARE TO BE DEVELOPED. AND SO ONCE THEY GET DEVELOPED, THEY'LL PRESENT SOME CHALLENGES THAT WE'LL NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE KEEP THESE COMMUNITIES SAFE. UM, GO AHEAD. NEXT SLIDE. UM, SO, UM, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT TXDOT DID WAS PROVIDE A LISTING OF, UH, OPTIONS THAT THEY THOUGHT WERE RELEVANT FOR IMPROVING THE WORK OR THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON BANDERA ITSELF. [00:05:01] AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS WHEN WE LOOKED AT OUR ANALYSIS SHOWED THAT A LOT OF THE NEW TRAFFIC IS ACTUALLY GONNA BE COMING FROM OUTSIDE 1604. UH, A LOT OF THE ANALYSIS THAT THEY DID CURRENTLY SAYS A LOT OF TRAFFIC IS ACTUALLY INSIDE 1604. BUT, UH, IF YOU LOOK FUTURE WAYS, IT'S ACTUALLY EVERYTHING'S COMING, YOU KNOW, NEW DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE 64, A LOT OF IT'S, UH, DIRECTED TOWARDS COLLIBRA. SO THAT'S WHERE ACTUALLY A LOT IS DEVELOPMENT GONNA BE COMING FROM. SO, SO, SO WHILE IT IS THAT TXDOT IS LOOKING TO IMPROVE THAT ROADWAY, AND SO THERE'S THIS PARALLEL TASK GOING ON, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING TO SEE WHAT WE CAN DO TO IMPROVE THE INSIDE, UM, UH, COMPONENTS WITHIN THE PLANETS OR WITHIN, UH, BENDERA ITSELF WITHIN OUR COMMUNITIES. AND SO, UM, THEY PRESENTED, UM, UM, 12 OPTIONS. UM, THE FIRST FOUR WERE, WERE, UM, FLOORED THE, FLOORED THE COMMUNITY. AND, UH, WE WERE ABLE TO WORK WITH OUR, UM, DISTRICT SEVEN OFFICE, UM, AND THE PLANNERS, AND THEY ACTUALLY REMOVED THOSE FOR A FUTURE DATE BECAUSE THEY WERE PRETTY INTRUSIVE TO THE COMMUNITY ITSELF. UM, SO IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. SO, UH, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THEY DID IN, IN ADDITION TO THAT, IS THEY ACTUALLY PULLED THESE OTHER OPTIONS OFF THE TABLE. AND I THINK THAT THE PLAN SHOULD RE, YOU KNOW, SHOULD INCLUDE THESE, OR WE NEED TO BE CONSIDERING THESE, UH, CERTAINLY AS OPTIONS TO REMOVE TRAFFIC FROM BANDERA. AND THERE'S ONE THAT IS THE SILENT SUNRISE, UH, SPECIFIC, UH, SPECIFICALLY. AND OUR, UM, THE, UM, MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN HAD THAT PARTICULAR ROADWAY CALLED OUT 1970, UM, AND IT'S STILL NOT DEVELOPED YET. AND SO, SO I USED TO DRIVE, UM, OUT TO SEAWORLD FROM THIS AREA ON A DAILY BASIS FOR 20 YEARS. AND SO I WAS GOING COUNTER TRAFFIC AND HAD THAT ROADWAY BEEN THERE, IT WOULD'VE CUT MY, MY COMMUTE TIME, UM, BY MORE THAN HALF, UH, SIMPLY BY PUTTING THAT ONE ROADWAY. AND SO THERE'S AN EXAMPLE RIGHT THERE, I THINK OF AN EASY FIX TO ACTUALLY DO A LOT OF OFFLOADING SIMPLY OFF OF BANDERA. 'CAUSE I DROVE ON ON BANDERA FOR THOSE 20 YEARS. SO, SO I THINK THERE ARE SOLUTIONS IN HERE THAT ACTUALLY WOULD HELP THAT I THINK THAT WE REALLY SHOULD CONSIDER, UH, AND BRING BACK INTO THE PLAN. UM, AND I THINK, UM, AND SO THIS IS THE ONLY, THE ONLY PIECE OF THE PUZZLE I HAVE AGREE WITH, HONESTLY, IN THE PLAN ITSELF. AND SO, SO THIS MAP HERE, UM, IS INCLUDED AND IS CONTI CALLED A SHARED USE PLAN. AND SO AS THE, AS THE OWNER OF A PLAN, YOU KNOW, I COME TO YOU ALL REGULARLY TO SAY, HERE'S WHAT'S GOING ON IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND HERE'S WHAT WE NEED TO BE WORKING WITH. AND, AND SO WE KIND OF USE IT, UM, AS A FLOOR, A FLOOR PLAN FOR WHAT WE WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN. SO, SO LET'S SEE. THERE'S NO POINT HERE. SO RIGHT HERE, UM, THIS ROADWAY, THIS CONNECTION RIGHT HERE TO RIGHT HERE DOES NOT EXIST. THAT IS NOT A ROAD THAT EXISTS TODAY. AND SO, SO I'LL SAY IT'S IN ERROR HERE. 'CAUSE THE, THE FIRST FOUR OPTIONS WE ASKED FOR THE CITY TO KIND OF TAKE OUT, THAT WAS ONE OF THEM THERE. AND SO THIS MAP INCLUDES IT. AND SO MY, MY, YOU KNOW, MY THOUGHT IS THAT, YOU KNOW, IF I WAS HOLDING THIS PLAN AND I WENT AND LOOKED AT THIS AND SAW THIS THERE, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THE CITY'S GONNA BE BUILDING IT AND THEY MAY NEVER BUILD IT. AND I THINK THAT'S A FUTURE DISCUSSION. MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE THAT THIS PARTICULAR SECTION RIGHT HERE IS PULLED OUT OF THE PLAN AS IS CURRENTLY BEING PRESENTED, UH, I GUESS THIS NEXT, NEXT VIEW TO CITY COUNCIL. SO THAT WOULD BE MY REQUEST OR OUR COMMUNITY'S REQUEST ACTUALLY. UM, SO, UM, AND THEN I ASKED THEM TO MOVE THIS WHOLE MAP HERE UP OVER TO THE CORNER HERE, THIS LEGEND, BECAUSE THIS ROAD HERE INCLUDES THE, A LOT OF PLACES WHERE ALL OF THE CITIZENS LIVE TO TRY TO MAKE THEIR WAY. AND SO IT'S KIND OF MASKING THIS, HIT THE SUNRISE, UH, THE SILENT SUNRISE PATH, WHICH I THINK IS VALID HERE FOR PART OF THIS DIALOGUE TOO. SO, BUT THAT'S MORE JUST A, YOU KNOW, CLEANUP THING. SO, BUT, UM, THAT'S IT. SO, YOU KNOW, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND, UH, HAVE A GREAT DAY. THANK YOU. SO, QUESTION FOR STAFF ON THE THINGS HE'S SUGGESTING ON THE MAPS. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT STILL CAN BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION? GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS CHAIR. UH, JOSH CHASKY, SENIOR PLANNER PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UM, I CAN LOOK INTO THAT. I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE HOW THE PROCESS GOES AS FAR AS REVISIONS AT THIS POINT, BUT, UH, WE CAN CERTAINLY INQUIRE AS TO THE PROCESS AND GET BACK WITH THE COMMISSION IF THAT'S SOMETHING, UH, THAT WE NEED TO DO PRIOR. BUT IT CAN DO THAT. WHEN IS IT SCHEDULED FOR, UH, CITY COUNCIL? JUST, I'M GONNA DEFER TO MY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ON THAT PROCESS. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING, RUDY NUNU. I'M THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UM, UH, THE MAP THAT YOU SEE, UH, ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW HAS GONE THROUGH A, UH, A SIGNIFICANT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROCESS UP TO THIS POINT. UM, WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS A, A SHARED USE, UH, PATH MAP. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A MAP OF EXISTING CONDITIONS, IT'S A MAP OF POTENTIAL CONCEPTS THAT COULD BE EVALUATED IN THE FUTURE IN ORDER TO CREATE THE PEDESTRIAN [00:10:01] AND BIKE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY IN THE COMMUNITY SO THAT THERE IS A FULL AND COMPLETE NETWORK IN THE COMMUNITY. UM, SO AT THIS TIME, STAFF WOULD NOT NECESSARILY PROPOSE REMOVING IT. UM, WE CAN CONTINUE TO WORK WITH, WITH FOLKS PRIOR TO THE, THE CITY COUNCIL TO SEE IF WE CAN, UH, PROVIDE MORE, UH, MORE CLARITY ON THE PROCESS AS WE MOVE FORWARD. BUT STAFF RIGHT NOW WOULD BE RECOMMENDING THE MAP, AS IS THE QUESTION. YES, MA'AM. SO I, I THOUGHT I UNDERSTOOD MR. GENERAL WAS TALKING ABOUT ABO ROAD THAT HE CURRENTLY DOESN'T EXIST. AM I INCORRECT? UM, AGAIN, I THINK HE, I THINK THAT THAT THE, AGAIN, I THINK THAT MAYBE SOME CLARITY NEEDS TO JUST BE, WE NEED TO BE DISCUSSING THAT WITH, WITH THE GENTLEMAN BECAUSE HE'S NOTICED, HE, HE DOES HIGHLIGHT THE FACT THAT GIBO ROAD, UH, THAT THERE MAY BE A CONNECTION, THAT THERE MAY NOT BE A CONNECTION THAT IS LISTED THERE. HOWEVER, THIS IS A SHARED USE PATH MAP. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A ROADWAY NETWORK MAP. SO WE'RE NOT ESTABLISHING WHERE THERE IS A CURRENT ROADWAY AT THIS TIME. QUESTION FOR STAFF, IF WE HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, IS IT OKAY TO CONTINUE TO ENGAGE WITH RUDY, OR DO WE NEED TO PULL THIS ITEM? YOU, YOU CAN CONTINUE TO ASK QUESTIONS OF AN ITEM THAT'S ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS? OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR RUDY. UM, YES, MA'AM. CAN YOU REMIND US HOW OFTEN THESE PLANS ARE, UH, REVIEWED, REFRESHED, MM-HMM. , UM, I KNOW THERE ARE SOME THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE QUEUE FOR A WHILE MM-HMM. . UM, SO CAN YOU TALK TO US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT? SO, SURE. SO WITHIN THE ESSAY TOMORROW PLANNING PROCESS, EVERY SUB AREA PLAN HAS A PLANNING HORIZON OF 10 YEARS. SO FROM THE TIME THAT WE ADOPT A PLAN, WE'LL BE WORKING TO IMPLEMENT THE GOALS AND POLICIES WITHIN THAT PLAN FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS UP UNTIL IT'S TIME FOR, FOR RENEWAL. UM, SO WE'RE, WE HAVE A A, WE'RE GONNA MAINTAIN A QUEUE TO MAKE SURE THAT PLANS STAY RELEVANT AND, AND ACTIVE. UM, WHEN IT COMES TO THE CORRIDOR PLANS, THIS ACTUALLY ISN'T GONNA BE THE FIRST QUARTER PLAN THAT WE HAVE DONE UNDER THE, UM, UNDER THE ESSAY TOMORROW. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM, IT IS RIGHT NOW LISTED TO BE A 10 YEAR PLAN, BUT IT'S ONE THAT WE'RE GONNA SUBMIT REALLY TO TDOT BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY, TDOT IS GOING TO HAVE THE ULTIMATE PURVIEW ON WHAT THE ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS ARE GONNA LOOK LIKE WITHIN THE PLAN ITSELF. UH, WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING WITHIN THIS PLAN IS TO PROVIDE THE TOOLS, UH, TO COMPLETE THE, THE, THE NETWORK AROUND BANDERA ROAD BECAUSE WE HAVE TO ADDRESS KIND OF THOSE FIRST, YOU KNOW, THOSE FIRST MILE, LAST MILE CONCEPTS WE HAVE TO ADDRESS BIKE LANES THAT EITHER DON'T EXIST OR ARE SUBSTANDARD AND SIDEWALKS THAT LEAD TO BENDERA ROAD. AND THEN WE DID MAKE SOME MULTIMODAL RECOMMENDATIONS AS WELL. SO, UM, UH, THIS PLAN WILL HAVE A 10 YEAR HORIZON. WE WILL BE REVIEWING IT, UH, EVERY 10 YEARS. AND SO I, I THINK THAT, DOES THAT GET TO, TO YOUR QUESTION? YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN COURAGE HAD A QUESTION. YES, THANK YOU. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT, UH, AS, AS THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS THIS, THE POINT THAT WAS JUST BROUGHT UP, UH, IF I WERE TO LOOK AT THIS, I WOULD ASSUME THERE'S A ROAD THERE. UH, AND I UNDERSTAND HE'S SAYING THERE'S NOT MM-HMM. , COULD YOU CLARIFY THAT WITH THE PERSON WHO MADE THE PRESENTATION AND THEN LET THE COUNCIL KNOW THAT SURE. THE STATUS AND MAYBE WHAT THE FUTURE STATUS IS OF THAT, THAT SCRIPT. SURE, SURE. YEAH, WE'RE, WE'RE HAPPY TO MAKE THE, MAKE THE, THE NECESSARY CLARIFICATIONS OR UPDATES THAT ARE NECESSARY. AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WE, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HIGHLIGHTED THE, THE, UM, THE TITLE OF THE, OF THE MAP AS, AS MUCH AS WE COULD. WE CAN SEE IF WE CAN AMEND THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLKS UNDERSTAND IT'S NOT A ROADWAY NETWORK MAP, BUT YES, SIR. THANK YOU CHAIR. ANY FURTHER, UH, COMMENTS OR DELIBERATIONS? COMMISSIONER SIEGEL? UM, SO, UM, I HAVE A QUESTION AND I, I THINK THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS POINT IS VALID THAT, UM, WHEN YOU ARE USING A PLAN TO COMMUNICATE OR A MAP TO COMMUNICATE, IT'S IMPORTANT TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN WHAT'S EXISTING AND WHAT'S PROPOSED. OKAY. AND THAT'S NOT VISIBLE HERE. OKAY. UM, SO I WONDER, UM, WHAT CONSCIOUS DECISION WAS MADE TO NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN WHAT'S EXISTING AND WHAT'S PROPOSED? AND, UM, ALSO I'M CURIOUS WHAT ARE THE DOTTED LINES ON THIS PATH? BECAUSE ON THIS MAP, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT IN THE LEGEND. SURE. UM, IN RESPONSE TO YOUR FIRST QUESTION, THE, UM, THE, THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PLANNING PROCESS, THERE WAS AN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT THAT WAS DONE, AND THAT WAS BASICALLY A, A REPORT OF THE CURRENT CONDITIONS IN STATE OF BANDERA ROAD AND, AND THE ROADWAY NETWORK, ET CETERA. SO THIS PLAN IS A PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN, PROPOSED, UH, SHARED USE, YOU KNOW, PRIORITY CONNECTIONS AND SO FORTH. SO IT IS A PLAN THAT NECESSARILY DOESN'T NECESSARILY SPEAK DIRECTLY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS VERSUS WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. IT'S STRICTLY A PROPOSED, UH, PLAN. SO IT'S NOT A STANDALONE, IN OTHER WORDS. CORRECT? CORRECT. UH, NO, THERE ARE ACTUALLY MULTIPLE, UH, COMPONENTS OF THIS PLAN. THERE ARE, THERE'S A SUSTAINABILITY MEMORANDUM THAT'S, THAT WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE FINAL PLAN. UH, THERE'S A TRANSPORTATION, UH, INNOVATIONS PLAN, UH, MEMORANDUM ALONG WITH AN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT. AND THEN OF COURSE, THE FINAL PLAN. SO THERE'S [00:15:01] ACTUALLY MULTIPLE COMPONENTS, UH, THAT WILL BE PLACED ON THE WEBSITE AND, AND, AND SUBMITTED FOR AS FINAL PACKET FOR THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. UM, I'M SORRY, AND THEN YOUR, YOUR SECOND QUESTION, MA'AM, WHAT ARE THE DOTTED LINES ON THE MAP? UM, THE DOTTED LINES ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND CORNER, THAT ACTUALLY IS THE CITY OF LEON VALLEY. AND SO, YEAH, WE, WE TRIED TO NOTATE IT, UH, IN THE MIDDLE, BUT YEAH, THE CITY OF LEON VALLEY, SINCE IT'S, IT'S NOT UNDER OUR PURVIEW, WE JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THAT OUTLINE OF WHERE THEIR JURISDICTION WAS. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES, MA'AM. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? UH, THANK YOU MR. MANA. THANK YOU FOR THE COMMUNITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THESE PLANS. AND I ASK THAT THAT YOU GUYS STILL CONTINUE TO WORK BEFORE YOU PRESENT TO COUNCIL TO ADDRESS ANY OF THOSE CONCERNS? YES, SIR. THANKS. UM, AS FAR AS CONSENT AGENDA, DO I HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVED. MOTION BY VICE CHAIR CREW HAYNES, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA. MS. CARILLO HAYNES? YES. MR. GARCIA? YES. MS. SIEGEL? YES. MR. LOPEZ? YES. MS. MILAM? YES. MS. CHANDLER? YES. MR. BUSTAMANTE? AYE. COUNCILMAN K? YES. CHAIR PROFIT? YES. MOTION PASSES. ALRIGHT, IT'S NINE 17. AND COMMISSIONER BUSTANI AS, UH, REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THE MEETING. UH, [Plats  ] [Variances  ] SO I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEMS THREE, FOUR, AND 13. MOVE TO APPROVE. UH, ITEMS THREE, FOUR, AND 13. SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MILAM. MS. SIEGEL? YES. MS. MILAM? YES. MS. CARILLO HAYNES. YES. MR. GARCIA? YES. MR. LOPEZ? YES. MS. CHANDLER? YES. COUNCILMAN COURAGE? YES. CHAIR, PROFIT? YES. MOTION PASSES. MR. MAY. LET, LET JOHN BACK IN AFTER BRIEF DELAY. IT'S NINE 18. AND COMMISSIONER BUS DE MONTE'S RETURN TO [Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments  ] THE MEETING. NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER 16 AND BEEZ PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. ITEM NUMBER 16 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE STINSON AIRPORT VICINITY LAND USE PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND IS LOCATED AT 9 4 4 6 SPA ROAD. THERE WERE NINE. THERE WERE 15 TOTAL NOTICES MAILED WITH ZERO RETURN IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION. AND THEIR VIA CORONADO IS OPPOSED. THE PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL IS REQUESTED TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO I D Z ONE. LIMITED INTENSITY INFILL DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICT WITH USES PERMITTED FOR FIVE DWELLING UNITS AND A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT. THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL IS INAPPROPRIATE AND INCONSISTENT WITH ABUTTING LAND. USES THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES HAVE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WITH LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE SAYS THAT ALIGN WITH THIS. WHILE THERE IS INDUSTRIAL LAND USE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE TWO SUBJECT FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THERE IS AN INTENTIONAL LAND USE BUFFER OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SEPARATING THE TWO. ADDITIONALLY, A SPOT ROAD IS A LOCAL STREET, WHICH IS NOT IDEAL FOR PROPERTIES THAT ACCOMMODATE MORE INTENSE LAND USES. THE APPLICANT COULD AMEND TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND USE FOR LESS INTENSITY AND FURTHER PROPOSED USES. HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT CHANGE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT COMMERCIAL LAND USE ENCROACHMENT TO ANY DEGREE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL THE APPLICANT FOR THIS CASE IS NOT HERE AND THEY'RE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO THE 1214 MEETING. THANK YOU. UM, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE MOVE TO CONTINUE, UH, MOTION BY COUNCILMAN COURAGE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA TO CONTINUE TO, UH, DECEMBER 14TH. COUNCILMAN COURAGE? YES. MR. GARCIA? YES. MS. CARILLO HAYNES? YES. MS. SIEGEL? YES. MS. LOPEZ? YES. MS. MILAM? YEAH. MS. CHANDLER? YES. MR. BUSANTE. AYE. CHAIR PROFIT? NO. MOTION PASSES. ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER 18. [00:20:08] ITEM NUMBER 18 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MIDTOWN AREA REGIONAL CENTER PLAN FROM EMPLOYMENT FLEX MIXED USE TO REGIONAL MIXED USE AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 200 BLOCK OF WEST JOSEPHINE STREET. THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO THE 1214 AGENDA AS WELL. THANK YOU MR. CHRISTENSEN. GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS. PATRICK CHRISTENSEN, THREE 10 SOUTH ST. MARY, SUITE 2,700. YES. I'LL BE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO THE DECEMBER 14TH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. I'M WORKING CLOSELY WITH A LOT OF NEIGHBORHOODS, A LOT OF, UH, INDIVIDUAL NEIGHBORS, CONDO COMMUNITIES, AND REALLY DOESN'T HAVE TO DO WITH PLANNING. WE'RE KIND OF IN THAT STAGE WHERE WE HAVE A SITE PLAN, THEY'RE ASKING FOR CHANGES TO SITE PLAN, WE MAKE THE CHANGES, WE GO BACK AND FORTH AND THEY LOOK AT THIS AS THE PLANNING AND THE ZONING IS ALL ONE PACKAGE. THEY KIND OF WANT IT ALL TO GO AT THE SAME TIME. SO I'LL BE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO THE DECEMBER 14TH MEETING. THANK YOU. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. SECOND. MOTION TO CONTINUE, UH, TO DECEMBER 14TH BY VICE CHAIR CARILLO HAYNES. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SCHINDLER. MS. CARILLO HAYNES? YES. MS. SCHINDLER? YES. MS. GARCIA? YES. MS. SIEGEL? YES. MR. LOPEZ? YES. MS. MILAM? YES. MR. BUSANTE? AYE. COUNCILMAN COURAGE? YES. CHAIR, PROPHET? YES. MOTION PASSES. [Approval of Minutes 27.  Consideration and approval of October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes  ] THANKS. UH, ONTO THE MINUTES. UH, ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS OR, UH, QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING? HEARING NONE. I'LL ASK FOR A VO VO VOICE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, STATE AYE. AYE. AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ANY ABSTENTIONS? MOTION PASSES. THANK [Director’s Report  ] YOU. IS THERE A DIRECTOR'S REPORT? YEAH, JUST TWO ITEMS TO SHARE REAL QUICK. UM, THE ADVERTISEMENTS TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION. UH, THAT ADVERTISED WINDOW CLOSED ON THE 11TH. UH, WORKING WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO GET THAT, UH, PROCESS ROLLING. GET THOSE, UH, REAPPOINTMENTS BEFORE, UH, CITY COUNCIL. SO I'LL KEEP YOU POSTED ON THAT. AND THE LAST ITEM THAT I WANTED TO SHARE, AS YOU RECALL, SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, DANIEL HASLETT, UH, HE RESIGNED FROM THE CITY. HE TOOK A POSITION BACK IN HIS, UH, HIS HOME STATE OF VIRGINIA. UH, I AM HAPPY TODAY TO ANNOUNCE THAT CHRIS MCCOLLIN, UH, HAS BEEN SELECTED AS THE NEW DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER. UH, HE WILL CARRY ON SUPPORTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CERTAINLY IF YOU ALL HAVE QUESTIONS, UH, HE'S GONNA BE A, UH, A GOOD POINT OF CONTACT FOR YOU AS WE MOVE FORWARD. SO, CONGRATULATIONS, CHRIS. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. UM, ALRIGHT. CAN I ASK A QUICK QUESTION? UM, DO WE HAVE DATES FOR THE DECEMBER MEETINGS? IS IT JUST THE 14TH? JUST THE 14TH? YEAH. THAT WAS 9:00 AM YEP. 9:00 AM JUST LIKE TODAY ON DECEMBER 14TH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NOTHING FURTHER TO DISCUSS. THAT'S 9 24. AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.