[00:00:02]
IT'S TWO O'CLOCK, AND WELCOME TO THE WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22ND, 2020 THIRD MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO.
UH, CAN WE HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION, PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON.
AND STAFF, PLEASE CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL.
UM, COMMISSIONER ZUKI PRESENT.
COMMISSIONER SCHINDLER PRESENT.
UH, COMMISSIONER SIPES? PRESENT.
TODAY WE WILL HAVE, UH, TWO AGENDAS.
UH, THE FIRST WILL BE A CONSENT AGENDA, UH, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE ITEMS TO BE INDIVIDUALLY CONSIDERED.
ALL ITEMS TODAY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM NUMBER 18, WILL BE CONS, UH, BE PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
[Public Comment]
AND BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THAT, I KNOW THERE ARE THREE VOICEMAILS TO BE LISTENED TO.I AM A RESIDENT OF 1 6 9 GREENLAWN DRIVE.
I WAS INVITED TO THE, UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE REQUESTED PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NUMBER PA 20 23 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 4.
UM, YES, I'M, I'M CALLING TO TO HOPEFULLY GET MY VOICE HEARD AND, UH, TO, TO VOTE AGAINST CHANGING THAT ZONING, UH, OR AGAINST THE CHANGES THAT ARE WANTING TO BE MADE.
UH, I DO NOT WANT MY, MY HOME TO BE POLLUTED MORE BY NOISE, BY BY LIGHT, UH, IN THE COMMERCIAL SETTINGS.
AND, UH, BUT BY THE TEMPO OF, OF HOURLY, UH, YOU KNOW, OPERATIONS THAT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY, MAY HAVE.
SO IT'S RIGHT BEHIND MY HOUSE AND I, AND I WOULD REALLY BE, UH, IT WOULD, IT WOULD LOSE, I WOULD LOSE ASPECTS OF MY, OF MY ELEMENT OF MY HOME, RIGHT? IT WOULD, IT WOULD FEEL MORE COMMERCIALIZED, MORE INDUSTRIALIZED.
SO, UM, PLEASE, IF, IF, IF, IF THE CITIZENS MATTER, YOU KNOW, THAT MY VOTE IS DEFINITELY AGAINST THAT.
SO, UH, THANKS SO MUCH FOR GIVING US THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE OUR OPINION.
GOD BLESS THE WORK THAT YOU DO.
MY NAME IS DEBRA MYERS AND I LIVE AT TWO ZERO THREE GREEN LAWN.
MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 585-6254.
I'M CALLING REGARDING THE REZONING CASE.
I AM AGAINST THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTIES AT 1 7 4 2 0 2 AND 2 0 6 SHERWOOD FROM URBAN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BECAUSE THE PROPERTIES BACK UP TO AND ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, UH, IT WOULD DISTURB THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN SEVERAL WAYS WITH THE, WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR BUSINESSES SUCH AS AUTO AND LIGHT TRUCK OIL, LUBE AND TUNEUP, AUTO GLASS TINTING, TIRE REPAIR, GAS STATIONS, APPLIANCE SALES AND REPAIR, LIQUOR STORE, MINIATURE GOLF, AND OTHER INDOOR GAMING FACILITIES SUCH AS AND SUCH AS SMALL INDOOR MOVIE THEATER, A PET CEMETERY, CHARITABLE FOOD, AND OR CLOTHING BANKS AND DRY CLEANING.
THE NEIGHBORS WOULD BE EXPOSED TO, UH, WATER, NOISE, AIR, AND LIGHT SOLUTION, NOT ONLY DURING THE DAY, BUT ON EVENINGS AND WEEKENDS, SUCH AS, AS A RESULT OF THE NATURE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED BUSINESS POSSIBILITIES, THIS WOULD DISRUPT AND DISTURB THE PIECE OF A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
[00:05:01]
A LARGE BUILDING WITH CONCRETE ACCESSES AND PARKING WILL ALSO IMPACT DRAINAGE AND WATER FLOW TO THE DRAINAGE AREA AT THE REAR EASEMENT OF THE PROPERTIES AND POSSIBLY CAUSE FLOODING DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES SUCH AS, UH, FENCES, LANDSCAPES, AND STRUCTURES.THEREFORE, ONCE AGAIN, I STATE I AM AGAINST THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY MENTIONED IN THIS MESSAGE.
HI, I AM CALLING REGARDING CASE NUMBER 20 23 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 4.
I'M CALLING AS AN INTERESTED PARTY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PLAN FROM AN URBAN LOAD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 1 74, 2 0 2, AND 2 0 6 SHERWOOD DRIVE.
MY NAME IS ROSE PIMENTEL AND MY HUSBAND JOSEPH PIMENTEL AND I HAVE LIVED AT 1 75 GREENLAND FOR 30 YEARS.
WHEN WE FIRST BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY, IT WAS BECAUSE IT WAS A PEACEFUL, VERY QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD.
NOW, WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES, WHO KNOWS WHAT KIND OF BUSINESS WILL BE BEHIND US.
MY HUSBAND AND I ARE 100% TOTALLY AGAINST THE PROPOSED CHANGES.
WE DO NOT HAVE A GUARANTEE WHO WILL BE MOVING IN AS A COMMERCIAL ENTITY.
IT COULD BE WELL, VERY WELL BE A CAR LOT, A RESTAURANT, A DRIVE THROUGH A MOTEL, A LIQUOR STORE, A GAS STATION, OR A GAS STATION.
HOW HEAVEN KNOWS WHETHER IT WILL BE, AND PERHAPS YOU KNOW WHO THE BUSINESS IS AT THIS TIME.
HOWEVER, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE CURRENT OWNER WILL NOT CONTINUE TO BE DOING BUSINESS AS THAT ENTITY.
LET'S SAY IN A YEAR, TWO, FIVE OR 10 YEARS.
THEY SELL IT TO SOMEONE ELSE DOING BUSINESS AS SOMETHING ELSE.
I REMEMBER WHEN THE PROPERTY BEHIND US WAS FOR SALE AND WE WERE ASKED ABOUT IT, WE HAD NO IDEA ALL THE COMMOTION, THE MESS, THE DISRUPT DISRUPTION THAT IT WOULD CAUSE.
THIS IS THE ONE REASON WHY WE ARE SO TOTALLY AGAINST THIS, NOT TO MENTION IT, THAT THERE'S A POSSIBILITY, POSSIBILITY OF HAVING LOUD MUSIC, A LOT OF TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THAT BUSINESS, WHICH WILL AFFECT US.
WE ARE A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WITH FAMILY COMING OVER ALL THE TIME.
THIS WOULD POSES A POTENTIAL DISASTER EVEN THOUGH THERE'S A FENCE IN PLACE AT THE MOMENT.
THERE WOULD BE NO RESTRICTIONS WHAT COULD BE BUILT BACK THERE AND IT COULD CAUSE DAMAGE TO OUR EASEMENT AND POSSIBLY THE DRAINAGE AS IT IS NOW.
SO TO SAY THAT WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE AMENDMENT CHANGE IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT.
THIS HAS BEEN A VERY QUIET, PEACEFUL NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS IS WHY SO MANY OF US BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY.
WE ALL WANT TO KEEP, KEEP IT THIS WAY.
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO MY CONCERNS.
AGAIN, THIS IS ROSE PIMENTEL TWO TEN FIVE SEVEN THREE EIGHT SEVEN FIVE TWO.
[Plats ]
ALL RIGHT.UH, DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION RELATED TO THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION APPROVED BY VICE CHAIR PECK.
UH, COMMISSIONER FAULKNER NAY.
[Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments ]
INDIVIDUAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED.UH, TODAY WILL BE ITEM NUMBER 18.
MY NAME IS CAMERON BLACKMAN, ZONING PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
ITEM NUMBER 18 IS LOCATED AT 1327 BANDERA ROAD.
REQUESTING TO AMEND THE WEST SOUTHWEST SECTOR PLAN FROM LAND USE DESIGNATION.
GENERAL URBAN TIER TO REGIONAL CENTER.
ONE IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED NO RESPONSE FROM DONALDSON TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, UNIVERSITY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AT WOODLAWN HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE WEST SOUTHWEST SECTOR SECTOR PLAN FROM GENERAL URBAN TIER TO REGIONAL CENTER IS REQUESTED ORDER TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO C THREE C THREE.
GENERAL COMMERCIAL INFO TO THE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
REGIONAL CENTER IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
THE PROPERTIES ABUTTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE CLASSIFIED AS GENERAL URBAN TIER AND RURAL ESTATE TIER.
THE MAJORITY OF BANDERA ROAD IS ESTABLISHED AS GENERAL URBAN TIER.
IN GENERAL REGIONAL CENTER LAND USE CENTERS ARE LARGER BIG BOX PROPERTIES WITH SEVERAL ACRES OF LAND TO ACCOMMODATE MORE INTENSE DEVELOPMENT.
[00:10:01]
UM, ACRES AND IS TOO SMALL TO BE CLASSIFIED AS REGIONAL CENTER LAND USE.STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE FOR TWO WEEKS.
IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO MAKE THAT REQUEST? YES SIR.
ANDREW DELA, I'M AT, UH, 7 7 5 GAND AND WE'RE ASKING FOR CONTINUANCE TO APRIL WHAT? APRIL 12TH.
UH, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM TO APRIL 12TH? MOTION TO ACCEPT.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
[Approval of Minutes ]
YOU.NEXT ITEM WILL BE THE MINUTES.
ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS? UH, QUESTIONS ABOUT LAST MEETING'S MINUTES? IF NOT, I'LL TAKE A VOICE VOTE.
ALRIGHT, ARE THERE ANY UPDATES FROM STAFF? NOT TODAY.
WELL, OKAY, EVERYBODY HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY.
IT IS TWO 11 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.