[00:00:04]
DEAR CARPENTER, HERE, HERE, THAT'S, UH, BAKER CHAIRMAN, PLEASE COURT REVIEW APPLICATIONS WHETHER ANYONE PRESENT, NECESSARY, NECESSARY TO SIGN UP.
IF YOU'LL BE CALLED ON AS A CASE REPRESENTATIVES, HE MINUTES TO PROPOSE TO OBTAIN.
ALSO SIGN UP CALLED UPON FOLLOWING PUBLIC TESTIMONY, IMPROVEMENT BY THE COMMISSION.
DOES OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR BY THE COMMISSION.
COULD BE, UH, JUST SAYING GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE'S SPEAK, ALL.
UM, WE HAVE A PRETTY SHORT AGENDA SO WE CAN GO AHEAD AND START, UM, ATTENTION TO THE SCREEN.
UM, WE HAVE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
UH, WE HAVE RECEIVED PUBLIC COMMENTS VIA VOICEMAIL.
HELLO, MY NAME IS ARI AND I RESIDE AT 5 0 8 LAMAR STREET WITHIN DIGNITY HILL.
I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF THE GROUP THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF, OF DITY HILL WITH REGARD TO CASE NUMBER 2022 DASH 4 28, LOCATED AT 1618 EAST HOUSTON STREET.
WE AGREE WITH O P'S RECOMMENDATION, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE REAR SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
SLIDING GLASS DOORS ARE NOT HISTORICALLY ACCURATE AND WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND ANOTHER TYPE OF DOOR BE USED THAT IS HISTORICALLY ACCURATE.
IN ADDITION, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF A SECOND BEDROOM OR ROOM IS PLANNED FOR THE AREA WHERE THE DORMERS ARE GOING TO BE BUILT.
WE DON'T SEE ANY DRAWINGS OF WHAT WILL GO THERE, IF ANYTHING, OR ARE THE DORMERS STRICTLY DECORATIVE.
WE WOULD LIKE TO COMMEND THE APPLICANT FOR THEIR NEW DESIGN FOR THIS LOT.
WE KNOW THERE WAS AN INITIAL CONFUSION AS TO THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S SHORT TERM RENTAL STIPULATIONS AND IT'S NICE TO SEE A PROPERTY OWNER TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AND RETHINK THEIR DESIGN.
AND THAT, SIR, IF YOU'RE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AND YOUR ADDRESS IS SIX 20 LABOR 5 21 RIVER WALK, RIVER WALK, IMPROVEMENTS IN 1614 EAST HOUSTON.
YOUR CASE HAS BEEN APPROVED AND YOU WOULD NOT NEED TO STAY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS HEARING.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT A MEMBER OF STAFF.
YOUR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OR COMMISSION ACTION LETTER WILL BE PREPARED IN EMAIL.
NEXT WE HAVE ITEM NUMBER FIVE H D R C, CASE NUMBER 20 23 1 4 3 11 23 SOUTHEAST MILITARY DRIVE.
[00:05:01]
A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR APPROVAL TO ONE, CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE TO FEATURE ONE STORY AND HEIGHT TO BE LOCATED IN AN EXISTING SURFACE PARKING PARKING LOT, AND TWO TO INSTALL SIGNAGE THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND ON BUILDING FACADES.THE APPLICANT IS NOTED A PYLON SIGN, UH, IN THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS.
THIS SIGN IS PROHIBITED BY CODE IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT AND CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN THIS REQUEST.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER ONE, THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION BASED ON FINDINGS B THROUGH L WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS, ONE THAT LANDSCAPING BUFFERS BE ADDED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE OR VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IT'S ADJACENT TO OR PARALLEL WITH PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS IS NOTED IN FINDING E TWO THAT ALL STUCCO FEATURE A SMOOTH FINISH.
THAT FIBER CEMENT SIDING FEATURE A SMOOTH FINISH THAT ALL STOREFRONT SI SYSTEMS FEATURE DARK FRAMES AND AN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE SUBMITTED TO O H B STAFF REVIEW AND APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED MEDICAL FACADE PANELS.
THREE, THAT ALL WINDOWS BE RECESSED AT LEAST TWO INCHES WITHIN THE WALLS IS NOTED IN FINDING FIVE AND FOUR THAT A DETAILED LANDSCAPING PLAN BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MISSION.
HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN IS NOTED IN FINDING L STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER TWO, THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNAGE WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS.
REVISED SIGNAGE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO O H B STAFF PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR SIGNAGE AND PERMIT.
ONE THAT THE APPLICANT REDUCE THE PROPOSED WALL SIGNAGE TO FEATURE SIGNAGE ON ONLY ONE FACADE OR REDUCE THE OVERALL SIGNAGE TO NOT EXCEED MORE THAN 50 SQUARE FEET PER FACADE.
REQUIRE AMENDMENTS TO SIGNAGE AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED.
ALL WALL SIGNAGE SHOULD BE, SHOULD FEATURE METAL SIGN FACES WITH INDIRECT OR HALO ILLUMINATION.
TWO, THAT THE APPLICANT REDUCED THE OVERALL SIZE OF THE MONUMENT SIGN FEATURE OF HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN FIVE FEET AND NO MORE THAN 25 SQUARE FEET PER SIDE.
I WILL NOTE, UM, FOR ITEM NUMBER TWO, STIPULATION ONE.
THE APPLICANT HAS, UH, VERIFIED THAT AS PROPOSED SIGNAGE DOES FIT WITHIN STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.
UM, THE APPLICANT'S, UH, MARK WALLY, UH, AND THE DESIGN TEAM ARE
MARK, I MADE YOU A PANELIST, UH, I GUESS SIGNED IN.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE, UH, INFORMATION ON THAT.
CAN YOU REPEAT THAT QUESTION, SIR? UH, I HAD INVITED ELIAS AND JEFFREY TO ATTEND AND SPEAK.
UH, NO, I DON'T, I DON'T SO THEY'RE NOT OKAY.
YEAH, THAT, I GUESS THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
SO, UM, WELL BRIEFLY WHAT, WHAT I WANTED TO DO, TALK ABOUT A COUPLE OF THOSE ITEMS. UM, UH, MOST OF THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, UH, I BELIEVE BE ABLE TO BEAT, UH, THE, THE STUCCO SMOOTH FINISH FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS AS WELL, UM, FOR FRONT SYSTEMS COULD BE A OFF FRAME AND, UH, UH, WE CAN SUBMIT THOSE MOUNT FACADE PANELS.
UH, UH, LET ME ASK THIS QUESTION.
WHEN DO, WHEN DO WE NEED TO SUBMIT A FILE FOR REVIEW? IT'S ON YOUR OWN TIME, UH, BUT YOU WOULD NEED TO SUBMIT THAT TO SUBMITTED OR I GUESS YOU'VE ALREADY SUBMITTED FOR A PERMIT.
UM, YEAH, SUBMIT THOSE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO STAFF AND THEN YOU WOULD NEED TO SUBMIT A REVISION TO YOUR PERMIT SET DEVELOPMENT SERVICE.
UM, AND, UH, UH, THE RECESSING OF THE WINDOWS, I THINK WE HAVE DONE THAT PREVIOUSLY.
UM, THAT'S NOT TYP ONE OF OUR TYPICAL DETAILS.
UM, AND THEN, UH, LANDSCAPING PLAN WE CAN REDEVELOP.
UM, THE, AS FAR AS THE SIGNAGE, I, I WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THE CLIENT WHETHER THEY WERE GOING TO REDUCE SIGNAGE.
UM, I DON'T WANNA SAY THAT WE'RE NOT, BUT, UH, I JUST NEED TO GET CONFIRMATION ON THAT.
UH, ADDITIONALLY THE BRAND, UH, REALLY RELIES ON, ON THE SIGNAGE.
UH, IT SHOULD HAVE A, THERE SHOULD BE A COLOR, UH, SEPARATE FILE HERE.
IT'S, UM, SO ON THE DUTCH ROAD SIGNS THEMSELVES WITH THE WORDS THE,
[00:10:01]
UH, BLUE, RED AND YELLOW RENDITION THERE IS PART OF THEIR BRANDING.UH, ALSO THE WINDMILL IS A, JUST AN IDENTIFIER PRETTY WELL.
UM, SO I, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD BE, UH, SOMETHING THAT WE COULD DISCUSS, UH, IN THE FUTURE OR WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO AT THIS POINT? UH, WELL, THERE'S A COUPLE OF OPTIONS.
UM, IF YOU STILL NEED CLARIFICATION FROM, UM, DUTCH BROTHERS REGARDING THE SIGNAGE, YOU COULD RECEIVE APPROVAL TODAY WITH STAFF STIPULATIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION SITE WORK AND LANDSCAPING PLAN.
UH, AND THEN, UH, THEY COULD FOLLOW UP, YOU COULD FOLLOW UP WITH THE NEXT HEARING WITH THE SIGNAGE AS A SEPARATE APPLICATION OR A SEPARATE REVIEW.
UM, OR THE COMMISSION COULD POSTPONE ANY ACTION ON BOTH THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AND SIGNAGE.
UH, SO YOU COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE CONSTRUCTION WITH STAFF STIPULATIONS IF YOU DON'T HAVE CONCERN WITH THAT OR, UH, POSTPONE EVERYTHING.
UM, I THINK, UH, IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BILLING, I, I THINK THAT WOULD BE MY PREFERENCE THEN REVISIT THE, UH, SIGNAGE.
UM, NOW IF, COULD YOU RE REITERATE LIKE THE, THE TIMING OF THOSE MEETINGS? UH, YES.
SO, UM, STAFF WOULD ESSENTIALLY RESET, UM, DOES SIGNAGE REQUEST TO THE NEXT HEARING, WHICH WILL BE ON, UH, MAY THE 17TH.
UH, AS FAR AS THE, UH, ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION, UH, APPROVAL, AS SOON AS YOU COULD SUBMIT THE REVISIONS TO THE BUILDING THE STAFF TO REVIEW AN APPROVAL, WE COULD ISSUE A C O A AND
UM, OBVIOUSLY IF THERE'S DISCUSSION OR REVISIONS, UH, BETWEEN TODAY AND THAT HEARING, UH, YOU COULD SUBMIT THOSE TO STAFF.
UM, IF THOSE REVISIONS, UH, IF THE DUTCH BROS WINDS UP AGREEING WITH STAFF OR IF THEY CONSENT TO STAFF STIPULATIONS, UH, THIS ITEM WILL BE PLACED ON THE CONSENT.
UM, MR. CHAIR, I'M, I'M CONFUSED ON THE PROCESS BECAUSE IT SEEMS THAT THE DECISION'S ALREADY BEEN MADE.
THEY HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT THE SIGN.
WELL, THE APPLICANT IS ASKING QUESTIONS OF STAFF APPLICANT CAN HOLD.
CORRECT, BUT, BUT DO, BUT, BUT LET'S JUST SAY THAT IN THE APPLICANT RIGHT NOW, THE WAY THAT THE CONVERSATION'S GOING, THAT HOLDS A SIGNAGE, BUT WE HAVEN'T HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE SIGNAGE THAT HE HAS THAT RIGHT.
WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GAUGE IN THE CONVERSATION BEFORE IS HE'S BEING LED IN THAT DIRECTION.
UH, WELL STAFF HAS GIVEN THE APPLICANT, THE, THE, UH, COMMISSIONER, ESSENTIALLY THE APPLICANT'S SAYING THAT THE SECOND HALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM HASN'T GIVEN HIM THE, GIVEN HIM THE AUTHORITY TO AGREE WITH STAFF'S COMMENTS FOR SIGNAGE.
SO WHAT HE WANTS TO DO IS TO POSTPONE, TO MAKE SURE THAT HE HAS THE AUTHORITY OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM TO COMMENT ON THE SIGNAGE OR TO AGREE OR DISAGREE BEFORE HE MAKES THAT DECISION.
BUT HE WOULD NOT LIKE THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING ITSELF TO BE HELD UP.
WHILE THAT'S STILL BEING DEBATED AND, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT EDWARD, I JUST, YOU KNOW, I'D LIKE TO ASK, BEING FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THERE IN DISTRICT THREE, ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO THE BOOKS AREA, I'M KIND OF WONDERING WHAT IS THIS MUST THE STANDARD THAT'S BEEN PRESENTED IN, IN THE GUIDELINES HERE, BUT OF THE, THE NEW BUSINESSES THAT ARE HERE NOW, IT'S SORT OF DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE SIGNAGE THERE SEEMS TO BE PROGRESSIVE AND IT'S A NEW AREA THAT IS NOT, ONE WOULD THINK THAT IT'S IN THE DISTRICT, WHICH IS A HISTORIC CONTEXT, REALITY'S A VERY MODERN URBAN CONTEXT WHETHER, WHETHER THERE'S ONE SIGN OR SIGN ON THE SIDE.
JUST WONDERING WHY WE WOULDN'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO
[00:15:01]
CONVERSATION WITH THE COMMISSIONERS.THE COMMISSION WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION I THINK, UH, ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING NOW IS UM, THE INDIVIDUALS ON THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM THAT COULD AGREE WITH THE COMMISSION OR COULD SPEAK IN DISAGREEMENT WITH THE COMMISSION AREN'T PRESENT.
UH, SO THAT DISCUSSION INSTEAD OF HAVING IT TODAY AND THEN AT THE NEXT HEARING, I THINK THE APPLICANT'S SIMPLY ASKING IF WE CAN HAVE IT AT THE, OKAY.
IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS I HAVE MR. CORRECT THAT ANY, ANY STIPULATION OR REVISION THAT'S REQUIRED OR AMENDMENT THAT'S REQUIRED AS PART OF THE STIPULATION WOULD, WOULD BE REVIEWED BY O H P STAFF FIND SUFFICIENT? CORRECT.
IF, IF THERE'S A DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND STAFF THAT WOULD COME BACK TO THE COMMISSION.
UM, HOWEVER, UM, THE UH, MISSION MANUAL, UM, IS PRETTY FLEXIBLE AS FAR AS WHAT IT ALLOWS AN APPLICANT TO INSTALL.
UH, SO I DON'T PROCEED THAT THAT WOULD BE SECOND GIBBS.
QUEZ CARPENTER S? YES AND AYE.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX H D R C CASE NUMBER 2 2 3 1 2 6 19 0 7 WEST KINGS HIGHWAY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR APPROVAL TO ONE DEMOLISHING EXISTING REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
CONSTRUCT A ONE STORY REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
CONSTRUCT A REAR ADDITION TO FEATURE APPROXIMATELY 110 SQUARE FEET.
INSTALL VARIOUS REAR YARD LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS.
INSTALL A WOOD GATE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PRIMARY HISTORIC STRUCTURE.
MODIFY THE EXISTING PORCH STEPS BY INSTALLING STACKING LIMESTONE PORCH STEPS AND STEEL HANDRAIL.
AND SEVEN, MODIFIED THE EXISTING POOL WITH DRIVEWAY TO THE
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER ONE, THE DECON, THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BASED ON FINDINGS D THROUGH F WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION.
ONE THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH THE CITY CONSTRUCTION ORDINANCE AND SELECTS A CERTIFIED DECONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE DECONSTRUCTION FORM SUBMISSION AND PER PERMITTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE U D C CHAPTER 12.
F RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM TWO, THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REAR INTERCESSORY STRUCTURE BASED ON FINDINGS G THROUGH HIGH WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS.
ONE THAT THE PROPOSED METAL ROOFING BE STANDING SAME AND FEATURE PANELS THAT ARE 18 TO 21 INCHES IN WIDTH SEAMS THAT ARE ONE TO TWO INCHES IN HEIGHT, A SMOOTH PROFILE AND A STANDARD G FINISH.
THAT THE PROPOSED ALUMINUM CLA WOOD WINDOWS THAT GEARED TO THE ADOPTIVE POLICY GUIDE FOR WINDOWS AND NEW CONSTRUCTION STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER THREE.
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A REAR ADDITION BASED ON FINDING J WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION.
ONE THAT THE PROPOSED ALUMINUM PLAD WITH WINDOW ADHERES TO THE ADOPTIVE POLICY GUIDE FOR WINDOWS AND ADDITIONS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER FOUR, THE INSTALLATION OF THE REAR YARD LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS AS SUBMITTED BASED ON FINDING K.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER FIVE, THE INSTALLATION OF THE SIDE YARD FENCE AND GATE BASED ON FINDING HELD WITH THE STIPULATION THAT A DETAIL BE SUBMITTED TO O H B STAFF REVIEW APPROVAL NOTING THE OVERALL PROFILE AND MATERIALS THE STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX.
FRONT PORCH MODIFICATIONS BASED ON FINDING M AS PROPOSED WHILE STAFF FINDS THE INSULATION OF THE STEEL HANDRAIL TO BE APPROPRIATE.
THE INSTALLATION OF STACKED LIMESTONE SLABS TO FUNCTION AS PORCH STEPS IS NOT CONSISTENT.
LOWER HISTORIC EXAMPLE OF EXAMPLES OF PORCHES FOUND WITHIN THE DISTRICT PORCH.
STEPS SHOULD BE REPAIRED IN TIME.
STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEM SEVEN, FRONT YARD AND DRIVEWAY MODIFICATIONS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING ONE THAT THE APPLICANT SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE INFIELD GRAVEL MATERIAL AND THAT DEPOSE MODIFICATIONS BE INSTALLED AND PULLED LENGTH OF THE DRIVEWAY.
[00:20:01]
A DETAILED LANDSCAPING PLAN POSE LANDSCAPING BED THREE THAT THE FRONT WALKWAY BE RESTORED TO A SIMPLE BOARD CONCRETE WALK THAT FLARES NEAR THE PORCH.STEPS FOUR THAT THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED FLAGSTONE PAVING BE REMOVED FROM THE FRONT YARD.
THE APPLICANT MAY RESUBMIT A DESIGN THAT FEATURES A SMALLER DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR STEPPING STONE PATH.
THE ACCESS BETWEEN THE WALKWAY AND DRIVEWAY IS NECESSARY WHILE MAINTAINING THE MAJORITY OF THE NATURAL FRONT LAWN AREA IS NATIVE GREEN SPACE.
FIVE OF THE PROPOSED FRONT WALL SHOULD BE ELIMINATED AS THERE IS NO RESIDENCE FOR THIS FOUND AS DISTRICT THE APPLICANT MR. ERIC MANN IS HERE IN PERSON.
MY NAME IS MATTHEW LEVIA, MY CLIENT MR. AGREE WITH ALL THE STIPULATIONS WITH FIVE.
SUBMIT THE NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS THERE ON ITEMS SIX AND SEVEN.
I GUESS WE WERE HOPING US OR EXPLORE SOME KIND OF MIDDLE GROUND.
UH, THE CASE BEING THAT PRIOR TO CONTRACTING HIS DRIVEWAY, WHICH CURATED CRACKED DOING GAP IN DRIVE PAVERS AS WELL CAME NON-COMPLIANT.
HE, HE DID THAT NOT KNOWING GUIDELINES AIR OUT WHAT HE'S ALREADY DONE.
IT'S LIKE A THAT IRATE THE NON-COMPLIANT.
UH, SO LOOKING AT UH, SIX ABOUT THE FRONT, FRONT STEPS, I THINK WE'RE FINE.
GOING BACK TO CONCRETE THAT STAFF RECOMMENDS YES, I WOULD.
I'D LIKE TO ASK A SHAPE THAT WE ALLOW TREADS, ACTUALLY TREADS THAT'RE MOVING BACK SHAPE.
UM, GUARDING I GUESS ITEM BEFORE THAT ALL THE FLAGSTONE ISSUED TO POTENTIALLY ASSESS THE DRIVEWAY COULDN'T BE REPAIRED BY JACK HAMMER.
THAT LIGHT THERE DRIVE SUCH THAT WE'RE TIED TO THAT BUT WE'RE ALLOWED DRIVEWAY THAT ATTEMPT THAT
[00:25:01]
CONNECTION, WHICH IS NOT VISUALLY THE STREET AGAIN.I GUESS I'LL, I'LL ALSO JUST 23 HOUSE HIGH COUNT.
UH, WE DO, WE HAVE BIANCA MALDONADO FOUR MINUTES.
TOM SIMMONS IS ALSO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY CHAIR.
MONZA P THANK THE A THANK THE APPLICANT FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 YEARS.
WE'RE HOPEFUL THAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PROPERTY'S OUTSTANDING VIOLATION OF THE FRONT YARD, A SOLID DRIVEWAY.
A OF NOTE, WHICH H ON DRIVEWAY IN THE A BY HD T ON AUGUST 16TH, THEA AFFIRMED HRC.
THE HDRC RECOMMENDATION WAS FOR THE APPLICANT TO REINSTALL THE ROACH CONCRETE WALKWAY FULL OF ALL CASE INFORMATION ADJUSTMENT PACKET AND ALSO THE LINK TO WE SUPPORT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ITEMS ONE THROUGH HOWEVER WE ASK FOR H D C TO ADDITIONAL STIPULATION FOR THE APPLICANT TO BE ISSUED.
NUMBER ITEMS ONE THROUGH FIVE THAT SEPARATELY THE ITEMS SIX AND SEVEN PRIOR TO THE ISSUE.
WE REQUEST THIS ADDITIONAL STIPULATION AS WE ARE CONCERNED.
THE NEWEST IMPROVEMENTS ITEMS NUMBER CONSTRUCTION L PRIORITIZED.
I'LL ALSO ADD THE APPLICANT GAVE US AN ECONOMIC HARDSHIP OF HAVING TO UNDO HOWEVER CONTACTED WITH LIGHTSTONE CONCRETE BY STAFF HE CHOSE TO H DRC.
BUT YOU'LL, HI, MY NAME IS TEDRA PRESIDENT FOR THE JUSTICE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 2352 WEST MULBERRY, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 1.
UM, I'M ADDRESSING I AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6 19 0 7 WEST KING HIGHWAY, H D R C.
CASE NUMBER IS 2023 DASH 1 26.
WE SUPPORT THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ITEMS ONE THROUGH SEVEN WITH STIPULATIONS.
WE REQUEST THE H D R C TO UPHOLD THEIR PRIOR DECISION FROM JUNE, 2021 TO RESTORE THE RIBBON, DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKWAY.
J A SUPPORTS THE H DRCS POSITION WHEN THE APPLICANT APPEALED THE CASE TO THE BOARD OF THE ADJUSTMENTS IN AUGUST, 2021.
PLEASE ADDRESS THE OUTSTANDING VIOLATION BEFORE ANY MORE WORK IS STARTED ON THIS PROPERTY.
[00:30:13]
CONSIDERING PARK REPRESENTATIVE,[00:40:06]
PROJECT[00:41:08]
C,[00:45:07]
THE FORMER[00:50:46]
C GIBB QUE CARPENTER.[00:55:17]
GARCIA MARINA[01:11:28]
I[01:11:29]
ACQUIRED[01:11:29]
THOSE.[01:21:01]
UH,[01:21:02]
SECOND CON CON PAA GIBBS.[01:27:37]
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.[01:35:08]
COMMISSIONER[01:40:02]
I.[01:41:10]
VISION BUT I EXPLORER GI.[02:03:42]
VELAZQUEZ.[02:03:42]
NO.[02:03:43]
VA[02:03:44]
BUT CARPENTER.[02:14:08]
A[02:15:21]
S.[02:15:59]
UH, AVENUE.[02:21:20]
THE CHARACTER QUE CERVANTES[02:30:48]
CERTIFICATE.[02:30:49]
HIS PERSONAL[02:35:49]
I'M YES.[02:40:04]
C MA.[02:50:23]
NO.[03:11:01]
GIVES[03:11:03]
FISH.[03:11:10]
[03:11:12]
QUE[03:12:55]
CARPENTER CERVANTES? YES.[03:24:17]
GIFTS.[03:24:23]
CARPENTER.