[00:00:02]
UH, THIS IS THE SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETING.
IT IS SEPTEMBER 26TH AND IT IS 2 0 1.
AND WE'RE CALLING THIS MEETING, UM, TO ORDER.
CAN WE GET ROLL? MR. NINO? PRESENT? MR. GARCIA? MR. FLORES? PRESENT.
MR. BROCK? PRESENT CHAIR RAMIREZ.
DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO PUBLIC COMMENT.
CAN WE HAVE THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA
[Briefing and Possible Action on the following items ]
PLEASE? FIRST ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON SS E P H C P APPLICATION FOR JP MORGAN CHASE BANK FOR STONE OAK 23 DASH 0 0 4.THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN NORTHWESTERN BEXAR COUNTY.
THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 71 ACRES LOCATED AT 2 0 8 5 5 STONE OAK PARKWAY, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS COUNCIL DISTRICT NINE.
STONE OAK IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S E P TO MITIGATE IMPACTS TO THE S E P COVERED SPECIES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDES 23.9 ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER HABITAT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND 16 POINT ACRES OF G C W HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
UM, PROJECT ARROW WILL REQUIRE 56.5 G C W CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CAB VERO AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY B C V UH, CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ENTIRELY OVER CARD ZONE ONE, AND IT'S NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT, UH, UNITS, NOR IS IT WITHIN 750 FEET OF ANY OCCUPIED FEATURES.
G C W CONSERVATION CREDIT FEE IS TWO THOU 226,000.
PARTICIPATION FEE WILL BE 71,000.
PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE IS 29,700.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEES OF $326,700 PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE ENROLLMENT OF THE, UM, TO THE PLAN.
AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
AND I DO WANNA JUST MAKE A COMMENT.
UM, NOW WE HAVE ESTABLISHED OUR NEW PRESERVE FOR CRANE, BACK CAVE.
WE RECEIVED THE APPROVAL FROM US FISH AND WILDLIFE, UH, BACK IN AUGUST.
AND SO NOW WE HAVE, THAT'S WHERE THE CREDITS WILL BE COMING FROM, OUR NEW PRESERVE.
AND WE DID RESERVE THE CREDITS, UM, OR ALLOCATE THE CREDITS BACK TO, UM, PARKS DEPARTMENT WHEN WE HAD, UM, BORROWED THOSE FOR THE OTHER ENROLLMENTS.
AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THIS APPLICATION.
AND FOR THE RECORD, UH, HOMER GARCIA, UH, ENTERED THE MEETING AT 2 0 2.
AND DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I'LL LOOK OVER HERE TO MY LEFT.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE RIGHT? THANK, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS ITEM? I'VE GOT A QUESTION.
UH, WAS THAT NOTED, UH, THAT THEY WERE BORROWED OR IS THAT JUST SOMETHING Y'ALL, SO THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY FOR A DIFFERENT, UH, I THINK IT WAS, UH, WAS IT JULY MEETING? THAT'S WHEN WE HAD A MEETING OF DISCUSSION THAT WE WERE BORROWING CREDIT CREDITS FROM, UM, PARKS DEPARTMENT.
BUT NOW THAT WE'VE ESTABLISHED A NEW PRESERVE, WE'RE GONNA BE ALLOCATING AND RESERVING THOSE CREDITS BACK TO PARKS DEPARTMENT.
SO, AND THESE CREDITS ARE COMING FROM CRANE BACK CAVE? YES.
THE ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA, THEY'RE ALL COMING FROM CAME BACK CAVES CREDITS.
DOES THAT HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YES.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY GLARY AND A SECOND BY BROCK.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, PLEASE.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S E P APPLICATION FOR JP MORGAN CHASE, BANK FOR WISEMAN.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN NORTHWESTERN BEAR COUNTY.
THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 35 ACRES AND LOCATED AT 3,700 WISEMAN BOULEVARD, SAN ANTONIO COUNCIL DISTRICT SEVEN, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK.
WISEMAN IS CONSIDERING THE DEV FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, AND THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE SS E P.
THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDES ZERO ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER AND ZERO, UM, ACRES.
ZERO ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WEER WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
[00:05:01]
PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CA VERO HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY B C V CONSERVATION CREDITS.THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ENTIRELY OVER CARD ZONE TWO.
PARTICIPATION IN THE S E P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE CARD ZONE ONE AND TWO, PARTICIPATION FEE OF $35,000 PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $3,500.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF $38,500 PRIOR TO COMPLETING ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.
AND THE OP, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS ITEM? LOOK TO MY LEFT.
CAN I GET A MOTION? A MOTION TO APPROVE? I SECOND.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE, UM, BY MR. NINO ON A SECOND BY MR. GARCIA.
ANY, ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
AND WE'LL HAVE THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH I UNDERSTAND IS A BRIEFING.
FOR ITEM NUMBER THREE, THIS IS JUST A BRIEFING, SO NO ACTION.
UM, THIS IS, UM, FOR AN M O A, UH, BETWEEN S C P H C P AND C P S ENERGY, H C P.
AND ONCE, UM, THE M O A IS FINALIZED AND COMPLETED, WE WILL BE PLACING THAT ON A FUTURE, UM, A FUTURE ITEM ON AN AGENDA FOR EX FOR CONSIDERATION AND EXECUTION.
SO FOR THE S E P, UH, C P S ENERGY INTENDS TO USE THE S E P FOR AUTHORIZATION OF INCIDENTAL TAKE OF COVERED CARDS INVERTEBRATES, UM, FOR CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE C P SS ENERGY CANNOT ENROLL DIRECTLY INTO THE SS C P, UH, C P SS ENERGY HAS REQUESTED TO ESTABLISH AN M O A WITH THE S C P, SO THAT C P S ENERGY CAN PROVIDE THE SS E P, UH, H C P TO OFFSET IMPACTS OF TAKE RESULTING FROM COVERED ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS C P S ENERGY, SYSTEMWIDE, H C P AND INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT.
UM, SO THIS M O A IS NOT FINALIZED.
UM, JENNY IS ON THE CALL IN CASE THERE'S ANY, LIKE, QUESTIONS OR IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANYTHING Y'ALL, UM, REGARDING THE, UM, M O A AND YES, AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF, UH, C P S ENERGY HERE TOO FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
DO WE HAVE A TIMELINE ON WHEN THAT M O A WILL BE COMING BACK TO US MORE OR LESS? UM, I DON'T HAVE LIKE A TIMELINE YET.
I KNOW IT'S, WE JUST HAD A MEETING LAST WEEK ABOUT, UH, DEVELOPING THE DRAFT, SO, UM, I WOULD SAY IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS PROBABLY.
ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? UH, IS C P S GONNA RE BE REQUIRED TO, UM, PAY INTO THIS, OR IS THERE ANY EXCHANGE OF CREDITS OR ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES? FOR IN THIS M O U, UH, YES, THERE WOULD BE A MI UH, MITIGATION FEES TIED TO IT, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT WOULD BE RIGHT NOW UNTIL JENNY DOES OR CONDUCT HER, UM, ANALYSIS AND REVIEW.
ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS TO THE RIGHT? OKAY.
AND I THINK WE HAVE ONE, UH, NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
ONE MORE ITEM PLUS THE MINUTES.
UM, ITEM NUMBER FOUR, JUST DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION RELATED TO MODIFYING THE START TIME FOR THE REGULAR, REGULARLY SCHEDULED SS E P COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETINGS.
SO, I KNOW WE START THESE MEETINGS AT TWO, BUT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT ENTERTAINING A CONVERSATION ABOUT, UM, CHANGING THE TIME TO A LATER TIME THAT IS MAYBE AMENABLE FOR EVERYONE'S SCHEDULE.
UM, I THINK, YOU KNOW, FROM OUR EXPERIENCE, THIS AGENDA HAS BEEN THE MOST ITEMS ON THE AGENDA THAT WE'VE, SO I DON'T KNOW IF MOVING THE MEETING TO A LATER DATE, THREE OR LATER TIME, EXCUSE ME, THREE 30, UM, WOULD BE BETTER JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S NOT IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR DAYS.
UM, YOU KNOW, OR ANY OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS? I, I COULD DO THREE O'CLOCK, THREE OR THREE 30 WOULD BE THE LATEST.
WE, WE, SOME OF US HAVE EARLY STARTS.
I'M OPEN TO MOVING THIS, UM, TO LATER IN THE EVENING, BUT WHEREVER IT LANDS, I'LL MAKE IT WORK.
JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE DISCUSSION, DO THESE MEETINGS ALSO HAVE TO BE EVERY TWO WEEKS? THEY DON'T, SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE EVERY TWO WEEKS.
THE ONLY TIME WE HAVE A MEETING IS WHEN WE HAVE AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
WE SCHEDULED, UM, WE'VE IDENTIFIED A SCHEDULE ONLINE JUST FOR OUR CUSTOMERS, BUT IF WE DON'T HAVE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, WE JUST DON'T HOLD A MEETING.
WE END UP CANCELING THE MEETING.
I I WAS JUST WONDERING IF MAYBE MAKING IT A MONTHLY MEETING MIGHT MAKE MORE SENSE GIVEN THE NUMBER OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.
BUT I MEAN, I'M, I'M FLEXIBLE.
I THINK IT WORKS OUT TO WHERE IT ENDS UP BEING A, UH, ONE AGENDA A MONTH.
BUT IN SOME SITUATIONS, THE CUSTOMERS ARE A LITTLE MORE
[00:10:01]
EAGER TO GET THROUGH THE PROCESS THAN OTHERS.SO I THINK HAVING THAT FLEXIBILITY IS, IS HELPFUL.
UM, BUT IF WE, IF WE HAVE A CONSENSUS TO MOVE THE, THESE MEETINGS TO THREE 30, I THINK THAT WOULD BE AMENABLE FOR EVERYONE.
ANY THOUGHTS? UH, I CAN MAKE THREE 30 WORK.
YEAH, I CAN, I CAN, I CAN DO THREE 30 AS WELL.
I USUALLY FINISH LUNCH BY ABOUT THREE 30, SO THAT'LL BE GOOD.
UM, I THINK WE HAVE A CONSENSUS AT THREE 30.
IS THAT OKAY? EVERYBODY AND I NEED A CLOSE, WELL, I MOVED TO
TO REMOVE THE START TIME FROM TWO O'CLOCK TO 3:00 PM OR 3:30 PM ON DAYS THAT WE HAVE MEETINGS.
HOW'S THAT? SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION BY, UH, MR. BROCK AND SECOND BY MR. NINO.
[Approval of Minutes ]
OUR MINUTES.ANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO OUR MINUTES? IF NOT, I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
I'LL MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY MR. NINO AND A SECOND BY MR. BROCK.
AND OUR MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT TWO 12.