[00:00:02]
COMMISSIONER SEGAL, CAN YOU HEAR US? YES.
ALRIGHT, IT IS 2:01 PM UM, CALLING TO ORDER THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO FOR, UH, OCTOBER 11TH, 2023.
CAN WE PLEASE HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION, PLEASE.
CAN WE STAFF PLEASE CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL? COMMISSIONER PECK.
I KNOW THAT A NUMBER, NUMBER OF PEOPLE ARE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ABOUT ITEM 18 AND 22.
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS INDICATED THAT THEY HAVE REPRESENTATIVES IN THE BOARDROOM TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE RELATED TO THOSE.
WE WILL CONSIDER THOSE SHORTLY IN THE AGENDA, BUT IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW, THEY'RE AVAILABLE FOR THAT.
WE WILL HAVE, UH, TWO AGENDAS TODAY.
[Plats ]
THE FIRST BEING THE CONSENT AGENDA.ALL ITEMS IN THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED WITH ONE VOTE.
UM, AND THOUGH EVERYTHING WILL BE ON CONSENT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM NUMBER 16, WHICH IS POSTPONED 18, WHICH WILL BE INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
AND ITEM 22, WHICH WILL BE ON INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO TAKE ONE MOTION FOR ITEMS 1915 AND 17, UH, TO APPROVE CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 25TH.
DO I HAVE ANY COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION RELATED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA? TAKE A MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER ZUKI.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
AND THEN ITEMS 15, 17, AND 19.
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE APPLICANT FOR ALL THREE OF THOSE PLAN AMENDMENTS IS REQUESTING CONTINUANCE TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 25TH.
ANY DISCUSSION FROM COMMISSIONERS? MOVE TO CONTINUE.
SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MILAM TO CONTINUE THE THREE ITEMS TO THE OCTOBER 25TH MEETING.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
[Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments ]
UH, CHAIR PROFIT.I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT ANYBODY IS HERE FOR ITEM NUMBER 16, WHICH IS THE SAWYER ROAD.
THAT ITEM HAS BEEN POSTPONED AND THEY WILL NOT BE HEARING ANYTHING ON THAT TODAY.
SO IF YOU ARE HERE FOR THAT ITEM, PLEASE BE AWARE THAT WE ARE NOT, UH, REVIEWING ANY OF THAT ITEM.
[00:05:01]
ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER 18.EVERYBODY JUST, YEAH, THEY'RE, THEY'RE SORRY ACTUALLY.
HELLO,
YOU GOOD? RUNNING AROUND A LITTLE BIT.
UM, CLIN ELIA WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COORDINATOR.
[Other Items ]
AND 2222 IS THE ANNEXATION ITSELF, UH, PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF EXPIRING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROPERTIES, UH, 4,200 ACRES.AND THE RELATED PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE IN ITEM 18.
UH, THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN HERE ON THIS MAP.
UH, IN THE YEAR 2014, THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO APPROVED LIMITED PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF THE ENTIRE SOUTH SIDE AREA, EXCUSE ME.
AND THEN FULL PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF THE AREA TWO YEARS LATER IN 2016.
SO, UH, AS A PART OF BOTH OF THESE PROCESSES, STATE LAW AT THE TIME REQUIRED THE CITY TO OFFER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WERE APPRAISED, UH, BY THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT AS AGRICULTURE OR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OR TIMBERLAND.
UM, PRIOR TO THE FULL PURPOSE ANNEXATION, THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ALL ENTERED INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO.
AND THESE AGREEMENTS ALLOWED THEIR CONTINUED AGRICULTURAL USE AND OTHERS, UH, AND GUARANTEED THEIR E T J, THEIR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION STATUS.
BASICALLY, THEY REMAINED OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS IN THE GREATER BEAR COUNTY AREA.
SO THESE AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENTS, UH, WERE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS AND ARE SET TO EXPIRE IN JANUARY OF 2024.
CURRENTLY, THERE'S 135 PROPERTIES TOTALING, UH, 40, ABOUT 4,200 ACRES, AND, UH, THEY WILL BE IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS THREE AND FOUR.
THE PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW FOR ALL ANNEXATIONS.
UM, THAT BASICALLY ADDRESSES CITY SERVICES TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON ALL THE PROPERTIES.
THINGS LIKE POLICE, FIRE, SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, UH, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT.
THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS SHOWN HERE FOR THE PROPERTIES THAT WILL BE GETTING PLANNED AMENDMENTS TODAY.
THAT IS, UH, APPROXIMATELY 43 PROPERTIES.
AND A LOT OF THESE CURRENTLY HAVE MULTIPLE DESIGNATIONS FOR FUTURE LAND USE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTIES.
SO THIS IS GOING TO BE BASICALLY CLEANING UP THOSE PROPERTIES THEMSELVES AND, AND DESIGNATING ONE FUTURE LAND USE PER PROPERTY.
AND IT WILL ALSO BE BASED ON WHAT IS LOCATED CURRENTLY ON THE PROPERTY.
THE FIRST ONE, UM, THIS IS AROUND FISHER ROAD I 35 AND FOUR 10, LOOP FOUR 10.
10 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED.
AND CURRENTLY GENERAL URBAN AND REGIONAL CENTER.
AND WE ARE PROPOSING GENERAL URBAN TIER.
[00:10:01]
ONE, UH, IS AT I 35 AND VON ARMY ROAD.THESE ARE ALL CURRENTLY RURAL ESTATE TIER AND SUBURBAN TIER.
AND, UH, TWO OF THEM WILL PROPOSE TO BE SUBURBAN TIER AND TWO OF THE OTHERS WILL BE RURAL STATE TIER 37 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR OF ZERO IN OPPOSITION AREA FOUR A 188 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
SOMERSET ROAD AND OLD SOMERSET ROAD, UH, AROUND KESSEN BERRY ROAD.
THESE HAVE MULTIPLE DESIGNATIONS OF RURAL ESTATE, SUBURBAN AND COUNTRY, AND MOST OF THEM WILL BE RURAL ESTATE.
AND THEN, UH, THREE OF THEM WILL BE COUNTRY AND ANOTHER WILL BE SUBURBAN AREA FOUR B 137 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
UH, THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF WATSON ROAD, CURRENTLY COUNTRY TIER AND NATURAL TIER WILL BE PROPOSED.
UH, REAL ESTATE TIER AND COUNTRY TIER AREA FIVE 17 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
THIS IS AT VERANO PARKWAY ACROSS FROM THE HIGH SCHOOL AND CURRENTLY SUBURBAN TIER PROPOSED AGRIBUSINESS.
RAMSEY, UH, WHICH IS R I M SS E, UM, STANDS FOR
THEY ARE RESEARCH, INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING, SPORT AND ENTERTAINMENT.
MAIL, EXCUSE ME, WRONG ONE, GETTING AHEAD OF MYSELF.
UH, 17, MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
MAILED ONE IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
THIS IS AT APPLEWHITE ROAD DOWN FROM TOYOTA, AND CURRENTLY COUNTRY TIER IN AGRIBUSINESS.
RAMSEY PROPOSED TO JUST BE AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY.
NEXT AREA SEVEN CAMPBELLTON ROAD IN LOOP, 1604, THE CO THERE CURRENTLY SUBURBAN PROPOSED TO BE RURAL ESTATE EIGHT MALE.
ZERO IN FAVOR, ONE IN OPPOSITION.
THE OPPOSITION WAS ACTUALLY THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER, WHICH IS ONE OF THE, UH, PROPERTY OWNERS BEING ANNEXED AREA.
EIGHT, SEVEN NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
THIS IS ALONG LOOP 1604, CLOSE TO IH 37.
CURRENTLY RURAL ESTATE TIER AND SUBURBAN TIER PROPOSED RURAL ESTATE, TIER NINE, UH, IH 37 SOUTH AND LOOP 16 0 4 23.
NOTICES MAIL ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
UM, MOSTLY SPECIALIZED CENTER AND ALSO A LITTLE AGRIBUSINESS.
RAMSEY PROPOSED TO BE ALL AGRIBUSINESS.
RAMSEY AREA 10, UH, DONNA ROAD AND IH 37 SOUTH.
UH, 12 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION, COUNTRY TIER, SUBURBAN AND RURAL ESTATE, ALL PROPOSED TO BE COUNTRY AND RURAL ESTATE AREA 11 A SEVEN.
MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
THIS IS DONNA ROAD AT IH 37 SOUTH AND CURRENTLY SUBURBAN TIER, COUNTRY TIER AND RURAL ESTATE TIER.
PROPOSED COUNTRY TIER 11 B 57, MALE, ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
SOUTH END ROAD AND BLUE WING TRAIL, UH, MOSTLY COUNTRY AGRIBUSINESS.
RAMSEY, SOME SUBURBAN, PROPOSED TO BE ALL AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY AND ONE COUNTRY AND ONE SUBURBAN AREA.
12 FINAL ONE, UH, 57 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR OF ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
A SPOT OF ROAD IN CHAU ROAD, UH, CURRENTLY SUBURBAN GENERAL URBAN COUNTRY AND PROPOSED ALL COUNTRY TIER.
THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS OUR TIMELINE.
OBVIOUSLY TODAY WE ARE AT PLANNING, COMMISSION, ZONING, COMMISSION WILL BE ON NOVEMBER 7TH, AND THEN CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 30TH WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANNEXATION.
WHEN MOST OF THESE REQUIRE, OR EXCUSE ME, EXPIRE ON JANUARY 19TH.
[00:15:01]
SEPARATE DATE, UH, BECAUSE ONE OF THE PROPERTIES EXPIRES ON JANUARY 29TH.AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL WE'LL HEAR FROM, UM, THE FOLKS SIGNED UP AND THEN WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU, CLINT.
ALRIGHT, UM, FIRST TO SPEAK CARL BAKER.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.
MY NAME IS CARL BAKER, UH, FROM THE FIRM JACKSON WALKER.
OUR ADDRESS IS 1900 BROADWAY, SUITE 1100.
I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF FIVE M CATTLE COMPANY, WHICH IS THE OWNER OF 1 4 3, I'M SORRY, 1 4 8 3 5 WATSON ROAD, WHICH IS ONE OF THE PROPERTIES, UH, SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED, UH, PLAN AMENDMENT.
THIS IS A AREA FOUR B ON THE PRESENTATION YOU WERE JUST SHOWN, UM, THE OWNER OF OUR PROPERTY REQUESTS CONSIDERATION OF A CHANGE, UH, OF THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COUNTRY TIER TO SUBURBAN TIER, WHICH WE FEEL IS THE MORE APPROPRIATE LAND USE DESIGNATION GIVEN THE CONTEXT.
AND, UM, I, I HAVE A GRAPHIC, UM, THAT I THINK, UH, IT'S NOT THAT GRAPHIC, IT'S A DIFFERENT ONE, UH, TO KIND OF ILLUSTRATE THE CONTEXT.
UM, SORRY, WE, WE, THIS WAS ON SHORT NOTICE FOR US, SO WE YES.
UM, SO THIS, THIS, UH, THIS SHOWS THE, UH, CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE, UH, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY IN THAT VICINITY IS SHOWN ORANGE THERE AS SUBURBAN TIER.
UH, THE, OUR PROPERTY IS WHAT'S OUTLINED THERE IN, IN BLACK, UH, WITH KIND OF THE RED CROSSHATCHING AND, UH, ADJACENT TO OUR PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE EASTS.
UH, OVER 330 ACRE, UH, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONED R FIVE.
IT'S UNDER ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
THERE ARE MANY HOUSES IN THAT, UH, DEVELOPMENT.
UM, YOU CAN ALSO SEE ON THERE THE PURPLE LINES THAT, THAT'S FROM THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN.
SO THIS PROPERTY SITS AT THE INTERSECTION OF TWO ARTERIAL ROADS AS SHOWN ON THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN.
UM, AND, UH, WHAT KIND OF PRECIPITATES THIS, OUR, UH, CLIENT HAS OWNED THIS PROPERTY FOR, UH, DECADES.
THEY CURRENTLY WILL USE IT AS A A CATTLE RANCH, BUT OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS THEY'VE BEEN APPROACHED BY, UH, SEVERAL, UH, SINGLE FAMILY DE DEVELOPERS SEEKING TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY.
UM, AS I'M SURE YOU KNOW, THAT THERE'S BEEN SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THIS PART OF SAN ANTONIO IN TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT AND ALSO HOUSING.
AND WE FEEL THAT THAT'S, THAT'S THE PATH THAT THIS PROPERTY'S GOING IN THAT DIRECTION.
THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT'S LOCATED JUST NORTH OF OUR PROPERTY ALONG WATSON ROAD.
UH, JUST SHOWING A A SIMILAR CONTEXT, THIS PROPERTY WAS CHANGED, UH, RECENTLY FROM COUNTRY TIER TO SUBURBAN TIER.
UM, IT'S ALSO UNDER ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
UM, SO, UH, MY CLIENT'S NOT CONTESTING THE ANNEXATION, UH, BUT REALLY, UH, SEEKS TO JUST HAVE A LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY THAT KIND OF SUITS THE CURRENT SITUATION AND WHERE THIS PROPERTY'S LIKELY TO BE DEVELOPED.
UH, I THINK IF YOU, UH, THE COUNT COUNTRY TIER DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR 10 ACRE LOTS.
UM, I THINK IN THE CONTEXT OF BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THOSE TWO ARTERIAL ROADS, UH, PLUS ADJACENT TO A LARGE SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, THAT'S NOT REALLY A REALISTIC, UH, UH, FUTURE LAND USE.
UH, THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND, UH, HAPPY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE.
UH, NEXT, UH, WE HAVE, UH, MR. LEONARD HERNANDEZ.
LEONARD HERNANDEZ, 2 0 2 6 0 CAMPBELLTON ROAD, AREA SEVEN.
SO THE TWO PROPERTIES WERE THERE.
ONLY ONE RECEIVED A NOTICE, WHICH IS, UH, MY 95 YEAR OLD MOTHER-IN-LAW.
WE DIDN'T RECEIVE A NOTICE, BUT WE ARE THE ONE THAT FILED THE OPPOSITION.
BUT I CAN TELL YOU WE'RE BOTH IN OPPOSITION TO ANY ANNEXATION AS WE WERE 10 YEARS AGO.
WE HAVE AG EXEMPTIONS, BOTH MY MOTHER-IN-LAW WITH HER FARM AND OUR ADJOINING PROPERTY AND OUR FARM.
AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE REASONS WHICH, UH, UH, WE FELT, UH, WE WERE ABLE TO, UH, AVOID ANNEXATION 10 YEARS AGO.
NOW, I PERSONALLY MET WITH MR. DUGAN, ONE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTORS BACK THEN, UH, ON THIS SUBJECT.
AND, UH, ON THAT, UH, UH, 10 YEAR, UM, UH, DELAY IF YOU WILL.
IT WAS REAL CLEAR THAT AFTER THE 10 YEARS IT COULD BE EXTENDED AGAIN.
AND THAT HAS BEEN OUR IMPRESSION ALL ALONG.
SO, WHICH IS WHAT WE WISH TO PURSUE.
[00:20:01]
NOW, I HAVE A NEIGHBOR HERE TOO THAT DID GET ANNEXED RIGHT NEXT TO US.AND THE SERVICES THAT WERE PROMISED THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO TAKE EFFECT TWO YEARS AFTER HAVE NOT OCCURRED.
THE MAINTENANCE ON THE ROADS IS NOT DONE.
STREET LIGHTS, NO PARKS OR PLAYGROUNDS AND CAN GO ON AND ON.
SO THAT'S A DEMONSTRATION OF IN OUR NECK OF THE WOODS, UH, SOUTH OF 1604, WHERE, UH, WE COULD EXPECT SOMETHING SIMILAR IF THAT OCCURRED, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE OPPOSED.
NOW, I ALSO WANNA HIGHLIGHT, I BELIEVE THAT IN 2017, SENATE BILL SIX WAS PASSED TO CURB INVOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS.
AND THEN AGAIN, THE 2019 ANNEXATION CHANGES SET OUT IN HB 3 47 ELIMINATED THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TIER ONE AND TWO.
SO WE FEEL THAT THE VOTERS, THE LANDOWNERS OR WHATEVER, HAVE A RIGHT, A SAY, AND AS I MENTIONED, AREA SEVEN IS 100% OPPOSED.
THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY OPPOSED, UH, FOR ANNEXATION.
UH, HAROLD EY? YEAH, I JUST, I PUT A NO ON IT.
SIR, IF YOU WANNA SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION, IF YOU CAN APPROACH THE PODIUM, PLEASE.
IF YOU COULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.
IF YOU COULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.
YEAH, HAROLD HEZIE, 4 3 8 9 MICKEY ROAD.
UH, Y'ALL BROUGHT US INTO THE CITY IN 17 AND IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A 10 YEAR BEFORE YOU BROUGHT THE REST OF MY PROPERTY IN.
SO, AND I GUESS, WHY DO YOU WANNA BRING THAT LAND INTO THE CITY? Y'ALL HAVE DONE NOTHING FOR US.
WE'VE HAD SAN ANTONIO POWER BECAUSE THAT'S ALL WE COULD EVER GET.
Y'ALL WOULDN'T LET US BUY ANYWHERE ELSE WATER BECAUSE OF THE GENERAL LAWSUIT FROM WHEN Y'ALL PUT IN THE SEWER PLANT AND YOU CONTAMINATED ALL THE WELL, SO THAT WAS PART OF THE SETTLEMENT.
WATERLINES, THERE IS A SMALL FIRE STATION OUT THERE NOW.
YOU NEVER SEE A POLICEMAN OUT THERE.
YOU SEE COUNTY POLICEMAN YET, NOT CITY, NO SORE.
AND THEY'RE, RIGHT NOW THEY'RE BUILDING 887 HOUSES ON MY FENCE LINE, WHICH Y'ALL HAVE NO INTEREST IN THIS.
BUT THAT'S BEEN PURE TROUBLE BECAUSE THEY DON'T FOLLOW ANY RULES AND YOU CALL THE CITY AND THEY LET 'EM GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING.
SO I'M TOTALLY AGAINST MY LAND BEING ANNEXED, SO THANK YOU.
DIANA HENSEY, DIANA HENSEY, 44 85 MICKEY ROAD.
I TOTALLY OBJECT TO ANNEXATION OF MY FARM LAND.
MY HUSBAND WAS RAISED OUT THERE, HE'S BEEN THERE ALL HIS LIFE.
AND THAT WE PAY CITY TAXES ON OUR HOUSE.
WHY CAN'T YOU LEAVE THE LAND ALONE? I OBJECT.
ALBERT ESCOBEDO, UM, OH, ALBERT ESCOVEDO, UH, 19 4 0 9 APPLE WHITE ROAD.
UM, I'VE LIVED OUT THERE FOR 30 YEARS NOW.
ME AND MY WIFE JUST CELEBRATED OUR ANNIVERSARY OUT THERE.
UM, MY IN-LAWS OWN THE LAND BEHIND ME, ANOTHER 200 ACRES, AND I PURCHASED ALL THIS LAND OVER THE YEARS FROM MY FATHER-IN-LAW.
AND I KNOW I'M KIND OF MIXED FEELINGS BECAUSE I'VE HAD, UH, BACK 30 YEARS AGO OR WHATEVER, WHEN, UH, ED GARZA WAS IN CHARGE OR WHATEVER, I HAD A LOT OF MEETINGS WITH HIM AND ME AND ED GARZA DIDN'T SEE EYE TO EYE ON ANYTHING.
BUT I KNOW I'VE TALKED TO CLINT ELIASSON AND HIS, UH, I FORGOT HER, YOUR NAME? PRISCILLA.
AND, YOU KNOW, THEY TELL ME, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF NICE THINGS THAT, THAT I DON'T MIND, BUT I'M JUST WORRIED THAT I, LIKE I SAID, I'VE BEEN FIGHTING THIS WHEN THEY HAD THE APPLEWHITE RESERVOIR, WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE AND, YOU KNOW, 'CAUSE THEY WERE GONNA TAKE PART OF MY FATHER-IN-LAW'S LAND FOR, UM, FLOOD ZONE AND THIS AND THAT.
SO, LIKE I SAID, WE'VE BEEN FIGHTING THIS FOR OVER 30 YEARS.
AND, AND LIKE I, AND LIKE THE OTHER GENTLEMAN SAID, I WAS TOLD THAT AFTER 10 YEARS AFTER THAT AGREEMENT THAT I SIGNED, THAT WE SIGNED THAT I'D HAVE AN OPTION OF RESIGNING ANOTHER 10 YEARS.
AND NOW THEY'RE SAYING, YOU KNOW, AND LIKE
[00:25:01]
I SAID, I'VE BEEN TO ALL THESE MEETINGS, UH, YOU KNOW, I'VE FOUGHT AGAINST THEM EVERYTHING.BUT IT SEEMS LIKE I TALK ON DEAF EARS BECAUSE AS SOON AS WE'RE DONE, THEY DO WHAT THE CITY DOES, WHAT THEY'RE GONNA DO ANYWAY.
THAT'S WHY, YOU KNOW, BUT I, I JUST, I SERVED IN THE MILITARY, I BOUGHT THIS LAND AND I DON'T LIKE BEING TOLD WHAT I CAN AND CAN'T DO WITH MY LAND.
I'M, I'M SCARED THE CITY ONE DAY IS GONNA COME IN AND SAY SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
AND I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT ALL THESE TEARS MEAN AND ALL THIS STUFF THAT, THAT, THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING ON MY LAND.
MY, I I, I HAVE THREE PLOTS ON MY LAND, YOU KNOW? AND, AND LIKE I SAID, I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THE, YOU KNOW, 'CAUSE SIAN AND ALL THEM HAVE, HAVE ALWAYS HELPED ME WHEN I NEEDED HELP AND, AND TO ASK QUESTIONS.
THEY'VE ALWAYS COME THROUGH AND TRY TO EXPLAIN IT TO ME, BUT I'M JUST WORRIED.
UM, 'CAUSE EVERY TIME I GET THESE LETTERS, AND LIKE I SAID, ME AND MY WIFE HAVE BEEN OUT THERE, YOU KNOW, NOW THAT THE TOYOTA PLANT'S BEEN IN THERE, I, I GET NO SERVICES FROM THE CITY, NONE WHATSOEVER.
UM, I, I CALLED THE POLICE WHEN THEY'RE RACING UP AND DOWN APPLEWHITE, AND I KNOW THE, THE SPEED LIMITS I LIVE OUT THERE FOR, BEEN AFTER 30 YEARS.
I KNOW IT'S, UM, UH, WHAT, 45 ON APPLEWHITE AND, UH, OR 40 ON APPLEWHITE AND 35 OR WHATEVER ON, ON ZAMORA.
AND I, AND, AND CARS GO BY ME LIKE I'M SITTING STILL, YOU KNOW, LIKE, LIKE THEY'RE HAULING TO GET IN THE TOYOTA PLANT.
THEY'RE HAULING TO LEAVE THE TOYOTA PLANT.
BOTH MY DAUGHTERS, MY DAUGHTER ALMOST GOT DECAPITATED BECAUSE HE WAS TRYING TO RUSH TO GET IN AND HE WENT ON HEAD ON INTO MY DAUGHTER AND THE HOOD WENT THIS FAR FROM HER NECK.
YOU KNOW, AND MY OTHER DAUGHTER GOT IN A BAD, ALMOST IN A BAD ACCIDENT BECAUSE THEY TURNED, THEY GO THROUGH THE LIGHTS, MAKE A U-TURN RIGHT THERE.
WELL, HE ALMOST U-TURN RIGHT INTO MY DAUGHTER, MY OTHER DAUGHTER, YOU KNOW.
AND, AND LIKE I SAID, I, I CALL THE POLICE WHEN THEY'RE RACING ON SUNDAYS ALL THE TIME.
ON, ON APPLEWHITE, YOU KNOW, AND, AND YEAH.
AND WE RESPECTFUL EVERYBODY ELSE'S TIME.
THAT'S WHY, YOU KNOW, SO THANK YOU.
UH, BOB, I'M SORRY I CAN'T WAG WMAN OR BOB MONTGOMERY? I, I'M NOT SURE, IS THERE BOB? NO, THERE'S EIGHT ALL LAMB.
OH, WE GOT, YEAH, THERE'S OTHER FOLKS TO SPEAK.
CAN YOU READ THAT NAME? NICOLE? BOB.
EMAIL IS BOB W YEAH, LAST NAME STARTS WITH A W.
UH, I ALSO, UM, MATTHEW GILBERT, UH, SIGNED UP TO SPEAK AND I'D LIKE TO TAKE HIS THREE MINUTES AS WELL.
AND THIS IS, UM, I SIGNED UP FOR ITEMS 18 AND 22.
SO I ACTUALLY DO WANNA MAKE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PRESENTATIONS HERE.
SO ITEM 18 IS ABOUT THE, AN THE, UM, PLAN AMENDMENT ONLY.
UM, SO JAMES MCKNIGHT, 1 1 2 EAST PECAN.
AND I'M HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF A BUYER FOR THE PROPERTY AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE, THE OWNER AS WELL TO REQUEST A DIFFERENT PLAN THAN WHAT STAFF HAS HAS ASKED FOR SO FAR.
SO THIS IS LOCATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND, UH, THIS IS GONNA BE A LITTLE CONFUSING.
THERE'S ACTUALLY THREE DIFFERENT TRACKS THAT WE'RE GONNA BE TALKING ABOUT.
THE TRACK IN RED IS WITHIN CITY IS OBVIOUSLY NOT PART OF THIS BECAUSE IT'S BEEN ANNEXED, BUT WE WERE REQUESTING A PLAN AMENDMENT AND, UH, A REZONING ON THAT PROPERTY CURRENTLY.
THE TWO IN GRAY, THE WESTERN TRACT AND THE EASTERN TRACT ARE BOTH WITHIN THIS ANNEXATION AREA.
ALL THREE OF THESE ARE PART OF THE SAME PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
AND THE TWO THERE ARE BEING ANNEXED, ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ACTUALLY BEING, UH, REQUESTED FOR A PLAN AMENDMENT.
SO I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THAT ONE AND THE, THE GRAY ONE NEXT TO, SO BOTH OF THE GRAY PROPERTIES IS WHAT I'M GONNA BE TALKING ABOUT TODAY.
THAT'S APPROXIMATELY, THAT'S APPROXIMATELY 50 ACRES.
IT'S FISHER ROAD TO THE SOUTH.
AND ALTHOUGH YOU CAN'T SEE IT IN THE MAP HERE, THAT'S LOOP FOUR 10 TO THE NORTH.
SO THIS IS THE CORNER OF, OF A HIGHWAY OF 35 AND LOOP FOUR 10.
SO AGAIN, THE PROPERTY, THE CITY TRACKED 45 ACRES.
NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT, BUT IT'S GONNA BE
[00:30:01]
RELEVANT IN TERMS OF WHY I'M REQUESTING WHAT WE ARE.SO ORIGINALLY, UH, IT WAS ALL PART OF THE SAME THING.
WE WERE ALL GONNA, WE WERE GONNA BRING IT ALL IN AT THE REQUEST ANNEXATION AND THE ZONING.
AND THIS WAS THE PROPOSED PLAN.
SO THE IDEA IS FOR WAREHOUSING, DISTRIBUTION CENTER LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK, AND WITH, WITH, UH, SOME SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE ISSUES, BUT MOSTLY WAREHOUSING AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
SO L ZONING IS WHAT WE'D BE REQUESTING.
THEN WE SHIFTED THAT AND ARE JUST, WE JUST STARTED WORKING ON THIS PIECE ONLY.
UM, SO AS THAT WAS GOING THROUGH THE, THE PROCESS WE'RE ASKING FOR AGRIBUSINESS REMSEY, THE REASON WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT IS THAT IS IN THE CURRENT SECTOR PLAN, IT'S THE ONLY DESIGNATION THAT ALLOWS THE L ZONING.
SO IT WAS REALLY THE ONLY ONE.
WE'RE KIND OF STUCK WITH IT FOR NOW.
UM, AND AS WE'RE GOING THROUGH THAT PROCESS, AGAIN, THIS IS FOR A DISTRIBUTION CENTER.
UM, YOU CAN SEE THE CORNER OF, OF THE 35 AND FOUR 10 IS ALL PRETTY MUCH GENERAL URBAN TIER.
THERE'S SOME REGIONAL CENTER, BUT THAT'S PRETTY INCONSISTENT.
THAT GENERAL URBAN TIER IS PRETTY INCONSISTENT WITH THE PATTERNS THAT YOU HAVE THERE.
AND FOR TWO HIGHWAYS CONNECTING, UM, STAFF, UH, THEY'RE PROPOSING TO JUST MAKE THIS GENERAL URBAN TIER.
SO AGAIN, THIS REQUEST IS FOR ALL OF THAT TO BE AGRIBUSINESS AMENDING.
THAT WILL BE MORE IN LINE WITH THE GENERAL USE PATTERNS IN THE AREA.
AND, AND I WANNA POINT OUT KIND OF THE, THE, THE, THE CONTEXT OF THIS.
SO HERITAGE SOUTH SECTOR PLAN WAS ADOPTED IN 2 10, 20 10.
SO THAT'S, IT'S A LITTLE OUTDATED AT THIS POINT.
AND THE AGRIBUSINESS AT THAT TIME WAS FOR, INTENDED FOR ISOLATED AREAS OF BUSINESS THAT AND DISTRIBUTE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.
IT'S ALSO FOR I ONE, IT'S NOT JUST LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, BUT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS KINDA STUCK IN THAT CATEGORY.
THE CITY INTENDS TO ADOPT A NEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN.
THAT'S THE FAR SOUTHWEST IS COMING UP SOON, BUT, BUT IT'S NOT THERE YET.
UM, SO THE IN CITY IS INTENDING TO ADOPT THIS NEW PLAN AND THAT'S WHAT'S, WHAT'S REALLY KEY HERE IS THIS AREA'S BEING FURTHER STUDIED FOR THAT NEW PLAN.
AND WHAT'S MORE APPROPRIATE IN THOSE NEW CATEGORIES THAT ARE BEING ADOPTED IS REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.
REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS VERY, IS ANALOGOUS TO REGIONAL CENTER, BUT REGIONAL COMMERCIAL NOW ALLOWS THE NEW CATEGORIES ALLOWS L THAT'S WHAT'S COMPELLING ABOUT THIS, IS THAT IN THE NEW PLANS THAT ARE BEING ADOPTED, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL, WHICH WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AT THE CORNER OF A HIGHWAY AND HIGHWAY ALLOWS L WE ARE IN THE HERITAGE SECTOR RIGHT NOW, SO WE DON'T HAVE MUCH OF A CHOICE BUT TO ASK FOR AGRIBUSINESS TIER.
BUT EVEN IN GETTING AGRIBUSINESS TIER AT THIS TIME, WE KNOW IT'S GONNA BE CHANGED IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS.
SO WHAT WE'RE REALLY AFTER IS THAT L ZONING, WHICH UNDER THE CITY'S POLICIES THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS AREA.
PLANNING IS ABOUT LOOKING FORWARD.
SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS TO SAY, WHAT IS THIS REALLY ABOUT? THIS PLAN IS CHANGING.
AGAIN, THIS WAS THE OVERALL PLAN AND THEN NOW WHAT WE'RE FOCUSING ON, UH, JUST FOR THE, THE PLAN AMENDMENT THAT'S GOING FORWARD.
BUT THEN THIS IS IMPORTANT AS WELL.
PART OF THE, PART OF THIS PROCESS, WHEN WE ASKED FOR THAT CHANGE ON THE, JUST THAT PORTION TO THE, THE CITY TRACTED, WHICH IS THE SECOND SLIDE THAT YOU SEE THERE, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.
THEY, THEY SAW THAT THIS IS A FORWARD-LOOKING PLAN AND SAID THAT IT IS, UH, MORE IN LINE WITH THE SURROUNDING USE PATTERNS.
SO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THEMSELVES LOOKED AT IT AND SAID, YEAH, I THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE L HERE BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO BE CHANGING THIS SOON.
UH, NOW OF COURSE THIS IS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR A TRACK THAT'S NOT UNDER CONSIDERATION TODAY, BUT I THINK IT'S RELEVANT BECAUSE IT'S PART OF THE SAME, IT'S ADJACENT AND IT'S PART OF THE SAME DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
SO JUST TO, TO SUM IT UP, THESE TWO TRACKS, AND I LABELED THEM BY THEIR PROPERTY IDS 'CAUSE I FIGURED THAT WOULD BE THE EASIEST WAY TO DO IT.
WE'RE RECOMMEND, WE'RE ASKING FOR AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY, AND THAT IS FOR, AGAIN, A FUTURE USE FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
I AM HERE FOR MY WIFE AND MY SISTER-IN-LAW.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR US.
AND I'M HERE FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 52 47 LABIS AND 47 75 EAST LOOP 1604.
UM, IF YOU'LL LOOK UP THERE, THE PROPOSED AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO FOR IS GENERAL URBAN TIER, WHICH WOULD BE MORE IN CONFORMANCE WITH WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
RIGHT NEXT TO US IS THE OLD HALLIBURTON TRACT, WHICH IS NOW NAVISTAR.
UM, I DUNNO IF Y'ALL CAN THEY SEE THE, UH, THE TRACKS? THIS IS THE ONE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
[00:35:02]
YEAH, HE'S DESIGNATING THE, THE PROPERTIES THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, THE ENCOMPASS ABOUT 98 ACRES, UH, PROBABLY ABOUT 50 ACRES IS IN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN AT THIS POINT.AND WE'RE NOT OPPOSING THE ANNEXATION, WE'RE JUST OPPOSING THIS RAMSEY, UH, THE PROPOSED, WHAT IS IT? UH, AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY TIER AND JUST GO TO GENERAL URBAN TIER.
I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH CLINT WITH THE PLANNING OFFICE SEVERAL TIMES AND HE THOUGHT THAT, UH, Y'ALL WOULD BE RECEPTIVE TO THAT.
JUST MAKING A MINOR CHANGE NOTICE HAS ALREADY BEEN GIVEN TO EVERYBODY SO THAT IT WOULDN'T CAUSE ANY ISSUES.
AND I THINK IT'S IN MORE CONFORMANCE, ESPECIALLY WITH THE STUFF THAT'S AT THE INTERSECTION OF 37 AND 1604, WHERE IT'S A MORE INTENSIVE USE, SPECIALIZED CENTER.
UH, THIS WOULD BE LESS AS FAR AS GENERAL URBAN TEAR.
UM, MY NAME IS AMY JOHNSON AND I OWN THE PROPERTY AT 52 47 LABIS ROAD.
THAT WAS MY HUSBAND THAT JUST SPOKE ON BEHALF OF MY SISTER AND I, AND OF COURSE, WHAT HE SAID IS WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR.
BUT I'D ALSO LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION.
MY SISTER CALLED ME YESTERDAY AFTER SHE RECEIVED HER NOTICE IN MAIL.
SHE LIVES IN ALABAMA, AND SHE RECEIVED HER NOTICE.
SO THEN WE BOTH REACHED OUT TO CLINT AND, UM, THE NOTICE.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THE NOTICE COMES TO YOU AND IT'S NOT DATED, NOR DOES IT COME IN AN ENVELOPE THAT HAS A POSTMARK ON IT.
SO I HAVE NO IDEA WHEN IT WAS SENT, IF IT'S CONTINGENT ON THIS MEETING, EVEN THOUGH IT SAYS FOR OCTOBER 11TH.
UM, AND I THINK IT'S THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ITS OWNERS OF WHAT'S GOING ON.
THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN IN MY FAMILY SINCE THE 19 HUNDREDS.
I HAVE DEALT WITH HALLIBURTON.
WHEN THEY CAME IN, LET ME TELL YOU, THAT WAS A MESS.
I SAT IN THE SAME OFFICE, HALLIBURTON BLEW IN AND BLEW OUT, TOOK OUT 80 YARDS OF MY FENCE LINE AND MY TREES BECAUSE THEY PUT SOMEBODY ON A DOZER WHO DIDN'T KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
AND, YOU KNOW, I HAVE THAT LAND AGRICULTURAL USE AND IT HAS BEEN FOR MY FATHER, MY GRANDFATHER, MY GREAT-GRANDFATHER.
SO I'M JUST SAYING THAT WHAT MY HUSBAND DID SAY WERE, BUT I THINK THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEEDS TO DO A BETTER JOB IN GETTING OUT INFORMATION BECAUSE WHEN YOU READ HOW MANY NOTICES WENT OUT, HOW MANY OPPOSED, HOW MANY AGREED TO IT? 0, 0, 0.
SO I'D JUST LIKE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT.
ADDRESS ADDRESS, TROY HITCHINGS.
AND, UM, THE PROPERTY THAT I HAVE IS AT, UH, 4 0 2 6 MATHIS LANE, WHICH IS, UH, A PRIVATE, WHICH IS A PRIVATE LANE.
IT'S NOT MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY OR THE STATE.
IT WAS A RIGHT OF WAY THAT WAS PUT IN THERE BACK IN THE 19, I THINK 1920S OR 1930S FOR PEOPLE TO GET TO THEIR PROPERTY IN THE BACK.
UH, I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHO'S GONNA MAINTAIN THAT.
IF IT'S, IF, IF, UH, MY PROPERTY GETS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY RIGHT NOW IT'S UNDER WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT.
UM, I'VE LIVED OUT THERE FOR 62 YEARS, WHICH IS ALL MY LIFE.
AND, UM, I WANNA KNOW ABOUT THE FIRE PROTECTION, POLICE PROTECTION BECAUSE THE LETTER I GOT FROM, FROM Y'ALL SAID THAT I WILL NO LONGER BE PART OF THE EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT.
SO IF MY PLACE CATCHES ON FIRE, WHO AM I GONNA CALL? STENSON, WHICH IS THE CLOSEST CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT IS 12 MILES AWAY.
THE EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT ON 1604 IS TWO AND A HALF MILES AWAY.
SO I WANNA KNOW WHO'S GONNA RESPOND TO THAT.
AND ALSO, UM, IF I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A TRESPASSER OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, IS THIS S A P D GONNA COME OUT THERE BECAUSE WHEN I CALL 9 1 1, THEY'RE GONNA SAY, WELL, YOU LIVE IN THE CITY.
SO I'M GONNA HAVE TO DEAL WITH THESE PROBLEMS ON MY OWN.
AND, UM, I WANNA KNOW ABOUT THE, HOW THAT'S GONNA AFFECT MY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT.
'CAUSE THERE'S CERTAIN THINGS I HAVE TO, BY LAW I HAVE TO DO, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT'S GONNA, HOW THE CITY, HOW IT'S GONNA CONFLICT WITH THE CITY IF, UH, THE CITY DECIDES TO ANNEX ME.
SO THOSE ARE SOME OF THE QUESTIONS I HAVE.
AND, UH, I'M TOTALLY AGAINST IT.
UH, YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW I REALLY CAN'T DO ANYTHING WITH MY PROPERTY BECAUSE OF COURSE, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT I SIGNED WITH THE CITY, UH, I'VE BEEN WANTING TO, UH, UH, PUT, UH, PUT A, A BARN UP FOR MY TRACTORS AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
BUT I'M SCARED TO DO ANYTHING BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CITY, YOU KNOW, IF I DO IT, WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S THE CITY GONNA DO? ANNEX ME RIGHT AWAY,
[00:40:02]
AND AFTER I'M ANNEXED, AM I GONNA BE ABLE TO BUILD ANYTHING ON THERE? SO THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF THE QUESTIONS I HAVE.AND I DON'T KNOW WHO I COULD TALK TO THAT COULD MAYBE ANSWER THOSE FOR ME.
UH, ONCE WE HEAR ALL THE PUBLIC COMMENT, UH, THE CITY AND, AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL RESPONSES TO ALL THE COMMENTS.
WELL, YOU KNOW, THE THING IS, IS THE, UH, MY EXPERIENCE WITH THE CITY, YOU KNOW, WHO'S GONNA DO THE TRASH PICKUP? AM I, UH, YOU KNOW, WHAT AM I GONNA PAY FOR AND WHAT AM I GONNA GET? YOU KNOW, I THOUGHT THAT LIMITED PURPOSE ANNEXATION WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN BEFORE FULL ANNEXATION.
LIMITED PURPOSE WAS FOR THE REASON TO PREPARE PEOPLE TO SLOWLY INTRODUCE, UH, SERVICES TO THOSE THAT THE CITY WANTS TO ANNEX.
OF COURSE, NOW THEY'RE JUST GONNA GO FULL-BLOWN ANNEX.
THERE'S NOT NO LIMITED PURPOSE ANNEXATION.
SO IF I COULD GET SOME ANSWERS TO THOSE QUESTIONS, I'D APPRECIATE IT.
UH, RON SM SME BERG, I BUTCHER THAT NAME.
RON BERG, FOUR IMPERIAL OAKS GOING ONCE, TWICE.
UH, MARTIN MARTINEZ, THAT GENTLEMAN, UH, LEFT.
HE SAID HE WAS NOT GOING TO SPEAK.
THOSE ARE ALL THE INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
UH, I'D LIKE TO SPEAK, I DIDN'T GET SIGNED UP.
DID WE ALREADY SAID, DID THE SIGN UP? THAT WAS BEFORE THE MEETING.
SO PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THIS IS CORRECT, BUT WE'RE GONNA TAKE 18 FIRST.
UM, CLINT, DO, DO YOU HAVE SOME FOLLOW UP TO SOME OF THE CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS THAT THE RESIDENTS HAVE? THE UH, UM, AS FAR AS INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS GO, UH, I WILL, I WILL GIVE THOSE RESIDENTS MY CARD.
THEY CAN, AND THEY CAN TALK TO ME AFTERWARD.
UM, AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THEY HAVE.
UH, THE OTHER REQUESTS, UH, FOR CHANGES, THE CITY'S NOT OPPOSED TO ANY OF THOSE, TO BE CLEAR.
THOSE, UM, REFER TO WHAT WE CONSIDER AS AREA FOUR A TO SUBURBAN TIER, CORRECT.
OH, I'M SORRY, FOUR B AS IN BOY.
UH, LET ME LOOK AT THOSE AGAIN.
UM, UH, YEAH, FOUR B WAS THE, WAS THE FIRST ONE THAT THE LONG TRACK IN THE MIDDLE AND AREA NINE TO GENERAL URBAN TIER.
UH, YEAH, THE ONE IN THE CORNER.
DID YOU HAVE A LAND USE CHANGE WITH YOUR PROPERTY AS WELL? AND THAT, WHAT AREA IS THAT CONSIDERED? AND THEN, UH, YEAH, HIS IS, UH, TWO TWO.
AND THAT'S TO AGRIBUSINESS RAMSEY? YES, SIR.
JUST WANTED TO GET THAT ALL STRAIGHT.
YES, THE, THE AREA NINE AS WELL.
UM, WE'LL, WE'RE GONNA TAKE 18 FIRST AND 18, JUST TO BE CLEAR, IS THE PLAN AMENDMENTS SPECIFICALLY, I'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, UH, WITH THE, OUR VIRTUAL ATTENDEES, COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, UM, THE ONLY QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS, UH, WHETHER WE NEED TO, UM, ARTICULATE AN AMENDED, UM, CONDITION, IF THERE'S GONNA BE AN AMENDMENT TO APPROVE OR DENY, UM, THE WAY THAT IT'S STATED NOW, UM, THEN WE HAD, WE HAVE A WAY THAT IT'S STATED IN THE AGENDA AND THEN WE HAVE SOME MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE, UM, IN RESPONSE TO SOME OF THE SPEAKER'S REQUESTS.
SO I FEEL LIKE DON'T WE NEED TO HAVE A, AN AN, YOU KNOW, AN AMENDED VERBIAGE SO THAT WE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON.
UM, MR. CHAIRMAN, UH, RUDY NINO, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, UM, SHOULD THE COMMISSION CHOOSE TO MAKE AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF HAS ALREADY STATED THAT WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO ANY OF THOSE, UM, THEN IT WOULD JUST BE, YOU KNOW, COMMISSION MOTIONS, UH, APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS.
UH, BACK TO AREA TWO, UM, WHICH IS MR. MCKNIGHT'S REQUEST, WE DID ADVERTISE FOR THE, THE METAL PROPERTY ITSELF.
UH, AND THAT ONE CAN BE CHANGED TO AGRIBUSINESS, BUT THE ONE DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF IT WAS NOT ADVERTISED.
[00:45:05]
OKAY.THE SURROUNDING, THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS ON, ON THAT ONE, WERE NOT NOTIFIED, SO IT CANNOT BE CHANGED.
YOU HAVE COMMISSIONER SIEGELS THAT, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? NO, THAT TAKES CARE OF IT FOR ME.
UM, QUESTION TO THE CITY, UH, THERE'VE BEEN SOME QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE NOTICES THAT, UH, WERE SENT TO THE, UH, PROPERTY OWNERS.
SOME HAVE NOT RECEIVED, SOME HAVE BEEN RECEIVED LATE FOR THEM TO RESPOND.
UH, SOME GOING THROUGH THE SLIDES, I'VE SEEN THE NOTICES LIKE THIS PARTICULAR ONE, ONLY 10 NOTICES SOME OTHERS, ONE N 88.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE NOTICES ARE SENT MEETING AT THE SAME TIME.
HOW FAR DO THE NEIGHBORS SURROUNDING PROPERTY, UH, ANY PROPERTY, ANY OF THE PROPERTIES WITHIN 200 FEET, WITHIN 200 FEET OF, OF THOSE BEING CHANGED? YES, SIR.
GIVEN THAT SOME OF THE LOTS SURROUNDING THOSE PARTICULAR PLOTS ARE LARGER THAN 200 FEET, SO A NEIGHBOR ACROSS FROM THAT PORTION OF THE LOT MIGHT NOT BE NOTIFIED? CORRECT? CORRECT.
IF, IF THEY'RE NOT WITHIN 200 FEET, THEN THEY MAY NOT.
WE'RE FOLLOWING CODE, WE'RE FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND THE
AND THE TIME THAT YOU SEND THE NOTICES, HOW FAR IT IS BEFORE THIS MEETING, UH, WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT AS WELL.
THAT WAS THE END OF SEPTEMBER.
UH, DO YOU SUGGEST THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT SOME OWNERS ARE NOT AWARE OF THE MEETING THAT WE HAVE TODAY? SPECIFICALLY THE ONE THAT YOU JUST MENTIONED TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPERTY? UH, THE PROPERTY OWNERS THEMSELVES THAT ARE BEING ANNEXED HAVE KNOWN SINCE 2014 THAT THEY HAVE A NON ANNEXATION AGREEMENT THAT WOULD EXPIRE WITHIN 10 YEARS.
AND WE, WE SENT OUT, UH, COURTESY LETTERS FIVE DIFFERENT TIMES FROM 2017 UNTIL NOW, STATING THAT THEY DO HAVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND REMINDING THEM OF THEIR, UH, THE, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ITSELF, WHAT IS LISTED IN IT, AND THAT IT WOULD EXPIRE IN 2024.
I WILL, I'LL STILL HAVE MORE QUESTIONS.
I'LL DISCUSS THE OPTIONS FOR THE COMMISSION.
WELL, I GOT A QUESTION FOR YOU.
COMMISSIONER MILO LETTER YESTERDAY IN THE MAIL.
HERE IT IS RIGHT HERE, SARAH, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED CURRENTLY.
UM, CLINTON, ANOTHER QUESTION FOR YOU,
COULD YOU EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT? UH, I WAS NOT WITH THE CITY AT THAT TIME, UH, IN 2014, BUT, UH, IF THEY TOLD THEM AT THAT TIME THAT, THAT THEY MAY BE ABLE TO EXTEND THEM, THEN THAT WAS UP TO THEM AT THAT TIME.
UH, ONCE THE 10 YEARS, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SAYS ITSELF, ONCE IT EXPIRES, THE CITY CAN ANNEX THE PROPERTY WITH THE CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER OR CHOOSE TO EXTEND IT.
IF THEY WOULD LIKE, THE CITY WOULD BE ABLE TO CHOOSE TO EXTEND IT IF THEY WOULD LIKE.
SO QUESTION THEN ABOUT THE, WITH THE CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER? YES.
AND IF THEY, THEY WERE ALSO RECORDED, UH, WITH BEXAR COUNTY.
SO IF THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD, IT WOULD'VE BEEN CONNECTED TO THE DEEDED AS WELL.
UH, AND THAT THE NEW PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD KNOW THAT THERE'S A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON THE PROPERTY ALSO.
AND, AND SO IF THEY DON'T CONSENT, THEY, EVERY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SAYS THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER CONSENTS TO IT AND THEY SIGNED IT.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
WELL, IF EACH OF THE PROPERTY OWNER'S CONSENTS TO THIS, AND YET THEY CHANGED THEIR MIND AND YET THEY CHANGED THEIR MIND, WHAT IS NEXT FOR THEM? DO THEY HAVE, UH, A LAWYER TO GET INVOLVED WITH US?
[00:50:01]
OR WHAT DO WE DO IF THEY DON'T, UH, DO ANYTHING? UM, NO PROPERTY OWNER FROM THE TIME THAT, THAT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MAYBE TWO, UH, HAVE EVER APPROACHED THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, EITHER ON THEIR BEHALF OR THROUGH AN ATTORNEY OR ANYTHING TO REQUEST ANY SORT OF, OF MODIFICATION TO AN AGREEMENT.SO ALL OF THE AGREEMENTS THAT ARE BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR ANNEXATION, UH, ARE CONTINUE TO BE VALID AGREEMENTS THAT ULTIMATELY THE CITY IS LOOKING FOR PROPERTY OWNERS TO MAINTAIN THEIR OBLIGATION TO, TO THE ANNEXATION.
SO IF THEY, UH, NEGATE TO DO ANYTHING, UH, WE THEN CAN TAKE LEGAL ACTION THEN, OR I'M, I'M NOT GOING TO SUGGEST ANYTHING RELATED.
I THINK THAT WHAT, WHAT WE HAVE TODAY ARE, ARE A NUMBER OF CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE FOLKS SIGNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, UH, IN 2014 STATING THAT THEY WOULD, UM, AGREE TO BE PART OF THE CITY IN 2024, AND THAT OUR OBLIGATION WOULD BE TO PREPARE SERVICES SO THAT WE CAN PROVIDE SERVICES ON DAY ONE.
AND THAT, UH, WE WOULD NOT TAKE ANY, ANY ANNEXATION ACTION IN THAT PERIOD OF TIME.
IN RETURN, WE WOULD GO THROUGH THE ANNEXATION PROCESS AT THIS TIME, AND THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD, WOULD, UH, CATEGOR CLASSIFY THEMSELVES AS, AS VOLUNTARILY BEING ANNEXED.
AND SO THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT TODAY.
UH, THIS IS, I GUESS I NEED SOME CLARIFICATION, UH, FROM STAFF.
IF WE'RE, CAN WE TAKE ACTION ON THE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND, AND THEN WOULD THAT ACTION BE IN PLACE SUBJECT TO THE AMENDMENTS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT? AND THEN NOT, AND IF THE, BUT IF THE, IF THE ANNEXATION VOTE DOESN'T CARRY HERE, DO THOSE PLAN AMENDMENTS REMAIN IN PLACE? ARE THEY SUBJECT TO A VOTE ON IN FAVOR OF ANNEXATION? UM, I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO TAKE ACTION ON THE ANNEXATION AND THEN THE PLAN AMENDMENTS BECAUSE THE, THE PURPOSE OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT IS IN FACT TO SUB, PARDON ME, TO SUPPLEMENT THE ACTION TAKEN ON, TAKEN FOR ANNEXATION.
I WANT TO GO AFTER THE, WHILE I, ALRIGHT.
UM, UH, WHAT, CAN I ASK ANOTHER QUESTION? SURE.
UM, AND I THINK I KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS, AND AGAIN, THIS MAY BE A STAFF QUESTION, MAYBE A GENERAL COUNSEL QUESTION.
UM, IT, THE NATURE, I GUESS THE, THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE PROPERTY IN 2014 WAS THAT THEY HAD, THEY WERE ALL SUBJECT TO ONE OF THREE TOTAL AVALOR TAX EXEMPTIONS, CORRECT? CORRECT.
IT WOULD BE, UM, AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OR TIMBER MANAGEMENT.
AND, AND NOTHING ABOUT THIS ANNEXATION IS NOTHING ABOUT THIS ANNEXATION WOULD CHANGE THEIR ABILITY TO RETAIN THOSE COMPLETE AVALOR TAX EXEMPTIONS, CORRECT? CORRECT.
COMING INTO THE CITY DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR, YOUR EXEMPTION.
AND, AND COMING INTO THE CITY CANON WOULD, UH, INCLUDE, UH, SOME ZONING AND PLANNING RELATED, UH, ITEMS THAT WOULD, UH, MAYBE CHANGE THE FUTURE PATH OF WHAT COULD BE DONE WITH THE PROPERTY.
WHAT COULD BE DONE WITH THE PROPERTY AND, AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
BUT NOTHING WOULD CHANGE THE FACT OF, NOTHING WOULD GET IN THE WAY OF THEIR CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY.
NOR WOULD IT MAKE IT ANY MORE DIFFICULT TO RETAIN THEIR 100% TAX EXEMPTIONS.
I THINK, UH, IT'S PROBABLY APPROPRIATE AS COMMISSIONER LOPEZ SUGGESTED TO TAKE THE ITEM 22 FIRST.
UH, SO DID, DID YOU WANNA MAKE, UH, SOME REMARKS RELATED TO 22? MR. ARE YOU YIELDING YOUR TIME? OKAY, THANK YOU.
JAMES MCKNIGHT, 1 1 2 EAST PECAN.
SO THIS IS, UH, FOR A SEPARATE PROPERTY OWNER AND IT'S FOR A SEPARATE ITEM.
SO I AM HERE ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER INDICATED HERE.
UM, THIS IS FOR AN 81 ACRE PIECE OF PROPERTY TO OBJECT TO THE ANNEXATION.
SO JUST TO KEEP 'EM SEPARATE, THAT FIRST CLIENT IS NOT OBJECTING TO THE ANNEXATION.
IT'S JUST ABOUT THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
THIS IS ABOUT THE ANNEXATION ITSELF.
UH, SO THIS PROPERTY'S LOCATED AT, ON WATSON ROAD AND VERANO PARKWAY, BOTH, UH, SECONDARY ARTERIALS AND DESIGNATED SUBURBAN TIER AT THIS MOMENT.
AND WE'RE NOT, UH, OBJECTING TO THAT.
BUT I WANTED TO GO THROUGH THE TIMELINE.
UH, SOME OF THE GENTLEMEN MENTIONED HERE BEFORE, SO PRE TWO, 2013, THE PROPERTIES USED AS AGRICULTURAL AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, RIGHT? SO THEN IN 2013, UM, THESE AGREEMENTS GO OUT AND IT WAS UNDER A, A SEPARATE SECTION OF THE CODE AT THE TIME, 43 0 3 5.
AND THE CITY PUT A 10 YEAR PERIOD ON THAT EXPERT OF, UH, HOW LONG THEY WOULD KEEP FROM ANNEXING THE PROPERTY.
2017, YOU HAVE SB SIX, AND THEN 2019 FURTHER EXTENDS THAT PROHIBITION ON THIS FORCED OR UNILATERAL ANNEXATION BY THE CITY.
SO THE LAW CHANGED, AND THAT'S REALLY
[00:55:01]
SIGNIFICANT AS TO WHAT AUTHORITY THE CITY HAS WHEN THEY ACTUALLY TAKE ANNEXATION ACTION.THEN IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR, THE CITY STARTED THEIR ANNEXATION PROCESS, THIS UNILATERAL ANNEXATION PROCESS TO FINALIZE ON NOVEMBER 30TH, WHICH IS PRIOR TO DECEMBER OF 2023, WHEN THE EXPIRATION OF THE AGREEMENT ACTUALLY TAKES PLACE.
SO THE CITY'S PLANNING ON TO ANNEX BEFORE THE AGREEMENT ACTUALLY EXPIRES.
SO THIS SB SIX RESTRICTED THE ABILITY OF MUNICIPALITIES TO UNILATERALLY ANNEX THE PROPERTIES AND A REQUIRED CONSENT.
THIS IS FROM THE, THE BILL AUTHOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT ON THAT IT REQUIRES THE CONSENT BY THE RESIDENTS BEING ANNEXED THROUGH EITHER AN ELECTION OR PETITION PROCESS.
SO CONSENT IS EITHER PETITION OR ELECTION, MEANING IT'S TWO DIFFERENT AVENUES THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.
THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY AUTHORITY THE CITY HAS TO ANNEX.
THERE'S A PETITION OR THERE'S AN ELECTION AND YOU CONSENT TO THAT.
SO THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS I, I'D START WITH IS JUST TO SAY THAT IN THAT 10 YEAR PERIOD, UM, YOU HAVE TO KEEP IT AGRICULTURE OR YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT AND THE CITY CAN INITIATE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS IF THEY WANT TO.
AND THAT REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL MID-DECEMBER FOR THIS PROPERTY.
AND AS PART OF THE AGREEMENT, THEY, LIKE I SAID, THE CITY AGREED NOT TO, UH, START THEIR ANNEXATION PROCESS EVEN OR TO ANNEX THE PROPERTY.
AND YET THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING.
THEY'RE GONNA ANNEX THE PROPERTY AND START IT BEFORE IT EVEN EXPIRES.
SO ON ITS FACE, I JUST SAY IF YOU FEEL LIKE THEY VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT, WHICH MEANS THAT MY OBLIGATIONS UNDER IT ARE VOIDED.
BUT YOU KNOW, THAT'S, THAT'S KIND OF A SURFACE LEVEL PROCEDURAL.
I THINK ALSO, I THINK IT'S, IT'S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THE AUTHORITY ITSELF 'CAUSE THAT'S A, A BIGGER ISSUE FOR ME.
SB SIX HAD THIS UNILATERAL ANNEXATION, UM, WAS NO LONGER PERMITTED.
AND SO PRE SSB SIX UNILATERAL ANNEXATIONS THERE POST THAT ANNEXATIONS PERMITTED ONLY IF THEY RECEIVE CONSENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS BEING ANNEXED.
AND THE CONSENT CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH TWO AVENUES.
SO THE AGREEMENT DOESN'T CONTEMPLATE THIS ELECTION OR PETITION.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE OF THE AGREEMENT, AND I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT, IT SAYS AT THE END, UPON TERMINATION, THE CITY MAY ANNEX THE PROPERTY MAY EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR FULL OR LIMITED PURPOSES, WHICH NO LONGER EXISTS.
AND SUCH ANNEXATION SHALL BE DEEMED WITH CONSENT OF THE OWNER.
SO THEY'RE DEEMING THE CON THE ANNEXATION PROCESS TO BE WITH CONSENT OF THE OWNER, MEANING THERE'S AN ANNEXATION PROCESS IN PLACE.
AND WE WILL CONSENT TO THAT, EXCEPT THERE IS NO AUTHORITY TO ACTUALLY START THE ANNEXATION PROCESS HERE.
IF THE CITY DECIDED TO HOLD AN ELECTION, THEN WE WOULD HAVE TO SAY WE CONSENT TO THAT.
OR I PETITIONED THIS AGREEMENT.
DOESN'T SAY THAT I PETITIONED.
ONE THING THAT WAS SAID HERE TODAY IS THAT AS PART OF THIS AGREEMENT, I'VE AGREED TO BE PART OF THE CITY AT THE END OF IT.
WHAT WE AGREED TO WAS THAT, THAT I WOULD, THIS ANNEXATION PROCESS BECAUSE AT THE TIME THIS WAS WRITTEN, THE CITY HAD UNILATERAL POWER THAT I THINK THEY CONTEMPLATED THE AGREEMENT THAT THEY WOULD STILL HAVE IT AND THAT THEY WOULD START THAT PROCESS AND THAT WE WOULD BE DEEMED TO CONSENT TO THAT.
BUT THAT PROMISE PROCESS ISN'T THERE.
IF YOU LOOK AT THIS AS JUST CONTRACT INTERPRETATION.
SO YOU SAY, WELL, IT'S LOOKED AT, AT JUST THE AGREEMENT THAT HAPPENED BETWEEN THEM.
THEY'RE STATUTORY REQUIRED TO GUARANTEE THE CONTINUATION OF E T J STATUS ON THE PROPERTY IN EXCHANGE FOR NON-DEVELOPMENT.
SO THERE IS A, A QUID PRO QUO HERE, RIGHT? THE, THE BENEFIT TO US IS THAT WE REMAIN IN THE CITY'S E T J, WHICH WE'RE SUPPOSED TO GET UNTIL DECEMBER.
AND THE BENEFIT TO THE CITY WAS THAT IT WASN'T, IT WASN'T DEVELOPED.
SO BOTH OF THEM UNDER THIS CONTRACT RECEIVED THE BENEFIT OF THAT AGREEMENT.
THEY ALSO RECEIVED THE BENEFIT OF, OF OUR CONSENT TO THE ANNEXATION PROCESS.
AND I AGREE THAT WE DO HAVE THAT UNDER THE AGREEMENT TO CONSENT TO A PROCESS AS LONG AS THERE'S AUTHORITY FOR THE PROCESS.
BUT THERE ISN'T, THE CITY HASN'T FOUND THE AUTHORITY TO EITHER PETITION OR TO, UH, HOLD AN ELECTION.
THE BALANCE OF POWER WAS GIVEN IN THE MUNICIPALITIES IN THE CURRENT, THE BALANCE OF POWER IS NOW GONE TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
WHY DO WE NOT AS PUBLIC POLICY GET THE BENEFIT OF THAT CHANGE IN LAW? WE DIDN'T, WE DIDN'T WAIVE OUR RIGHTS WHEN WE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT TO RIGHTS THAT DIDN'T EXIST YET.
WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT THE BALANCE OF POWER WOULD SHIFT AT THE TIME.
HOW CAN WE WAIVE THE RIGHT TO A PETITION WHEN THERE WAS NONE AT THE TIME? IT WASN'T CONTEMPLATED.
WE WAIVED THE RIGHTS THAT WERE THEN IN PLACE.
SO THAT'S OVERALL, I BELIEVE THAT THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ANNEX THE WAY THEY'RE ANNEXING THE PROPERTY.
THE LAW HAS CHANGED AND THE BALANCE OF POWER SHIFT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT SHIFT IN POWER.
AND IF THE PROPERTY AUTHORITY IS FOLLOWED, WE WOULD CONSENT TO THAT.
THE RESPONSE FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
[01:00:01]
I WOULD SUGGEST GOING AND DO EXECUTIVE SESSION OKAY.AND DISCUSS THESE LEGAL MATTERS.
IN JUST A MOMENT, WE HAVE LANGUAGE TO BE ABLE TO STATE TO BE ABLE TO START THAT EXECUTIVE SESSION.
I WAS, I WAS GONNA SAY IT'S UNDER CHAPTER SUB, UH, WAIT, SEE, SO, OKAY.
THE TIME IS 3:01 PM THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO PLANNING COMMISSION IN ACCORDANT WITH SECTION 5 51 0.07, ONE OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE CHA NOW GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT DISCUSSION OF LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO ITEMS, UH, PENDING OR PENDING OR CONTEMP, UH, TEMPLATED LITIGATION.
AFTER SUCH DELIBERATION, THE COMMISSION WILL RECONVENE AN OPEN SESSION ISSUE.
ALL RIGHT, THE TIME IS NOW 3:35 PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MET IN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND IS NOW RECONVENING AN OPEN SESSION.
UM, WE'LL WE ARE GONNA TAKE ACTION ON ITEM NUMBER 22, WHICH IS THE ANNEXATION.
JUST AS A REMINDER, UH, THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS A RECOMMENDED BODY, UH, APPOINTED BY THE CITY TO CONSIDER, UH, EITHER TO ACCEPT OR OR DENY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
UM, EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS NECESSARY TO ADDRESS SOME QUESTIONS THAT WE HAD FOR COUNSEL.
UM, ARE THERE ANY FURTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS RELATED TO ITEM 22? HEARING NONE.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
UM, ITEM NUMBER 18, WHICH ARE THE PLAN AMENDMENTS? IS THERE ANY FURTHER COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION RELATED TO THOSE? SO WHAT I'LL BE LOOKING FOR IS A MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED HEREAFTER FOR PROPERTY ID 1 8 9 4 7 7 TO BE SUBURBAN TIER AS A PLAN PROPERTY ID 1 2 8 0 9 3 TO AGRIBUSINESS SLASH RAMSEY TIER PROPERTY ID IS 1 6 0 2 8 6 AND 1 6 0 2 7 8 TO GENERAL URBAN TIER.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOPEZ TO APPROVE AS AMENDED.
[Approval of Minutes ]
IS THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING.I KNOW THAT, UH, COMMISSIONER SIEGEL HAD SOME CORRECTIONS THAT WE TOOK INTO ACCOUNT.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR CORRECTIONS FOR THE MINUTES? IF NOT, I'LL SEEK A MOTION.
I MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED.
SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER FAULKNER FOR APPROVAL.
IS THERE A DIRECTOR'S REPORT TODAY? NOT TODAY.
[01:05:01]
WE ARE ADJOURNED.