* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:05] GOOD AFTERNOON. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO FOR MARCH 13TH, 2024. THAT'S NOT MIND. BEG MY GAVEL IN A MINUTE. UH, CAN WE PLEASE HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION, PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON. BUENO. THANK YOU. CAN STAFF PLEASE CONDUCT ROLL CALL? COMMISSIONER PECK. COMMISSIONER SIEGEL. COMMISSIONER FAULKNER. COMMISSIONER GARCIA HERE. COMMISSIONER ZUKI PRESENT. COMMISSIONER LOPEZ. HERE. COMMISSIONER MILAM? HERE. COMMISSIONER ORIAN. HERE. COMMISSIONER SIPES. NO CHAIR. PROFIT PRESENT. QUORUM IS PRESENT. THANK YOU. THIS, THIS THE SPRING BREAK VERSION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. UM, WE WILL, [Plats  ] UH, THE PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTS AS A ADVISORY BOARD OR COMMISSION TO THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO. UH, WE WILL HAVE TWO AGENDAS TODAY. UM, ONE WILL BE CONSENT WHERE ALL ITEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ONE MOTION WILL BE TAKEN. AND THEN ITEMS THAT WILL BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY TODAY. UM, ITEMS THAT WILL BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY ARE ITEMS, UH, 12 AND 13. AND ITEM 11 IS POSTPONED. ALRIGHT. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY DELIBERATION OR QUESTIONS, DISCUSSION RELATED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA? NO QUESTION. HEARING NONE. I'LL ASK FOR A MOTION. I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. COMMISSIONER ORIAN. SECOND. COMMISSIONER MILAM. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? YES. COMMISSIONER MILAM? YES. COMMISSIONER GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI? YES. COMMISSIONER LOPEZ? YES. CHAIR PROFIT? YES. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. [Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments  ] ITEM NUMBER 12. ITEM 12 LOCATED AT 7 0 8. FREDERICKSBURG ROAD IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO MARCH, UH, 27TH. AND I DO BELIEVE WE HAVE, UH, PUBLIC COMMENT TO THOSE. YEAH, WE DO. UH, WE DO HAVE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO ITEM 12. THAT, THAT THE APPLICANT IS A ASKING FOR CONTINUANCE. WOULD YOU, DO YOU GUYS STILL WANT TO SPEAK TODAY? UM, MR. FINGER AND CHERYL. OKAY. YEAH. DOESN'T, I'M SORRY. CAN YOU HEAR ME? THE ITEM IS, IS BEING CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE. DO YOU WANT TO STILL SPEAK TODAY? YEAH, PLEASE. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. MR. CHAIRMAN, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION? MY NAME IS JACK M FINGER. I AM A, UM, I LIVE IN THE BEACON HILL AREA AND I'M A MEMBER OF THE LOCAL, UH, CHURCH THERE, ST. ANNE'S. UH, THERE ARE NUMEROUS RED FLAGS WITH THIS PROPOSAL. UH, THE, UH, WELL, YOUR VERY OWN PLANNING COMMISSION HAS MENTIONED SOME OF THEM IN YOUR BACKUP DOCUMENTS. YOU MAY WANT TO REFER TO THEM AS I TAKE THEM OFF FOR YOU. UM, JUST BASICALLY, I'M JUST GOING TO THE VERY LAST PAGE HERE. IT SAYS, UH, THEY RECOMMEND DENIAL. WHY? WELL, A TATTOO PARLOR AND BAR TAVERN GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. LEMME REPEAT. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IS BASICALLY UNSUITABLE. THESE ARE YOUR WORDS HERE, OVER HERE. UH, ADDITIONALLY, INTRODUCING A HIGHER INTENSITY LAND USE THAT A BUS, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ALLOWS FOR ENCROACHMENT, UNDERLINED ALLOWS FOR ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. ALSO, IT SAYS THAT, UH, USE OF A TATTOO PARLOR AND, UH, UH, VARIOUS C3 USERS CAN HAVE OR CANNOT HAVE A PRO PROPOSED BAR TAVERN BECAUSE OF THE NON-ALCOHOLIC SALES DESIGNATION, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. IT, IT IS CLEAR THAT ALCOHOL SALES IS NOT, I UNDERLINE NOT A DESIRED USE WITHIN THE CORRIDOR. THAT'S YOUR VERY OWN STAFF REC, UH, RECOMMENDATION. NOW, YOU'LL HAVE OTHERS WHO SAY, WELL, IT, AND IT, IT'S OUT DATED. IT NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. WELL, NOT REALLY. IT'S EVERY, THE CONDITIONS ARE STILL THE SAME, BUT ALSO YOU HAVE OTHER BIG ISSUES. YOU HAVE, UH, THE, UH, UM, PARKING, YEAH, PARKING, [00:05:01] THE OVERFLOW OF THE PARKING, THE TA, THE, UM, THE BAR THAT IN THE EVENING, WHERE ARE THEY GONNA PARK ALONG THE CURB OF THE STREETS FOLKS, YOU HAVE NOT ONE, YOU HAVE TWO CHURCHES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS THING. TWO OF THEM. WE KNOW THAT, AT LEAST AT MY CHURCH, THE PASTOR THERE THAT THINKS IT'S A BAD IDEA. AND I KNOW THAT THE PASTOR OF THE OTHER CHURCH, I THINK IT'S CALLED AN AFFINITY CHURCH, FORMERLY BEACON HILL BAPTIST. THEY DO NOT LIKE THAT EITHER. 'CAUSE THEY KNOW THE, THE, THE PARKING WILL ENCROACH UPON THEIR CURBS, THEIR AREAS AND SO FORTH. UM, AND AND NUMBER THREE, YOU HAVE, YOU ALREADY HAVE ANOTHER BAR TAVERN, JUST TWO BLOCKS AWAY, TWO BLOCKS AWAY. YOU REALLY DON'T NEED ANOTHER ONE THERE. I THINK THE PASTORS OF THE CHURCH WOULD ALSO, BESIDES THE BIG ISSUES OF THE PARKING, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, THEY'LL SAY, WHY DO KNOWING THAT, UH, TOO MANY PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW HOW TO HOLD THEIR LIQUOR. WE, THEY MAY JUST COME BY AND, AND CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR CHURCH MEETINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING ON THE WEEKDAYS. YEAH. THE CHURCHES DO HAVE ACTIVITIES IN THE EVENING, EVENTS IN THE EVENINGS, NOT JUST THE PARKING, BUT PERSONS WHO, UH, JUST MAY WHO HAVE ILL INTENTIONS, UH, ACCOSTING AND SO FORTH. THEY REALLY DON'T LIKE THAT. WE, WE WE'RE TRYING TO GET AWAY FROM THO THOSE VICES. THERE'S ALREADY A TATTOO PARLOR THERE. OKAY, FINE. BE THAT AS MADE. DO WE NEED TO ADD TO IT? AND I'M UNDERSTAND FROM ST. ANN'S, THERE'S GONNA BE A SCHOOL BEING PLACED THERE SOON. WITHIN 300 FEET. THREE MINUTES. OKAY. ANYWAY, THESE ARE NUMEROUS RED FLAGS AND WE REALLY ASK YOU, I KNOW YOU WANNA CONTINUE IT, WHY NOT JUST DENY IT OUTRIGHT TODAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. FINGER. MS. TENA. THANK YOU. UH, MY NAME IS CHERYL TENA AND I AM A RESIDENT AND PROPERTY OWNER IN BEACON HILL. AND I HAVE BEEN FOR MOST OF MY LIFE, I'M A PAST PRESIDENT. I'M ALSO A PARISHIONER ALONG WITH MR. FINGER AT UH, ST. ANNE. I APPRECIATE THAT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, MS. WEISLER, HAS AGREED TO A CONTINUANCE. UM, THE GOOD NEWS IS, WITH ALL THE CONCERNS THAT MR. FINGER HAS RAISED, WE ARE DISCUSSING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER HOW TO ADDRESS THINGS LIKE PARKING AND TRAFFIC AND HOURS OF OPERATION. UM, OBVIOUSLY THE FLIP SIDE IS THEY WANT TO RENOVATE AND THEY WANT TO, UH, DEVELOP AND DO SOMETHING THAT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE, WITH THE COMMUNITY. SO WE'RE IN CONVERSATIONS WITH THAT. MY ONLY WISH IS THAT, UM, I DON'T KNOW THAT TWO WEEKS WILL BE A LONG ENOUGH TIME TO WORK OUT ALL THE DETAILS. WE ARE IN CONVERSATIONS EVERY DAY AND WITH SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS, INCLUDING THE TWO PASTORS, UH, AND THE SCHOOL THAT'S IN, UH, ONE OF THE CHURCHES. UM, I WOULD LIKE THE MATTERS TO KIND OF BE CONSIDERED TOGETHER TO ALLOW US TIME TO ADDRESS EVERYONE'S CONCERNS. UM, PASTOR ISAAC QUOTED, UH, WE WANNA WIN-WIN SITUATION. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE, WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO. WE'RE HOPING WILL HAPPEN. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 27TH. SO MOVE SECOND. MOTION TO GRANT CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 27TH BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MILAM. COMMISSIONER GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER MILAM. YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI. YES. COMMISSIONER LOPEZ? YES. COMMISSIONER ORIAN. YES. CHAIR PROFIT? YES. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. ITEM 13. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS SAMANTHA BEDA, ZONING PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. ITEM NUMBER 13 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE IH 10 EAST CORRIDOR PERIMETER PLAN FROM REGIONAL COMMERCIAL TO INDUSTRIAL. LOCATED AT 6 3 5 7 RIMAN ROAD. THERE WERE 14 NOTICES MAILED TO IN FAVOR. ZERO OPPOSED WITHIN 200 FEET. THERE IS NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION LOCATED WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT SEEKS A PLAN AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL TO REZONE TO I ONE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO COMMERCIAL USES WITH REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS, STAFF CONSIDERS THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT UNSUITABLE. ALTHOUGH I ONE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IS PRESENT IN THE AREA, IT IS CONCENTRATED ALONG WOODLAKE CENTER ACROSS FROM PROPERTIES WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION, WHICH ALIGNS WITH THE GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, INTRODUCING [00:10:01] A HIGHER INTENSITY LAND USE THAT ABUTS GENERAL COMMERCIAL ALLOWS FOR ENCROACHMENT INTO THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG RUMAN ROAD STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. CAN WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT PLEASE? HI, MY NAME IS KEVIN LOVE AND I'M REPRESENTING THE, THE, WELL, THE DEVELOPER, THE POTENTIAL BUYER. SO WE CAN WE GO TO THE ZONING MAP? AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE, YEAH, YOU STILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO ZOOM IN ON IMAGES. OKAY. THIS UP ON THE SCREEN HERE. SO BASICALLY, UH, OUR ORIGINAL REQUEST WAS TO INCLUDE THIS, UM, THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. UM, HOWEVER, WE JUST NEED A SMALL PORTION OF IT BECAUSE THAT IS C3. UM, YEAH, CAN YOU ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT? SO BASICALLY WE'RE, WE'RE SET BACK BEHIND OUR PROJECT. IT CONSISTS OF, UM, UH, ALMOST 200,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. AND SO IT'LL BE USED FOR INDIVIDUAL BUSINESSES THAT WILL HAVE, YOU KNOW, OFFICE WAREHOUSE, WAREHOUSE TYPE FUNCTIONS. UM, AND, AND, AND SO WE'RE BASICALLY IN THE GRAY. AND THEN WE ALSO INCLUDE, AND I'LL SHOW YOU A SITE PLAN IN JUST A SECOND, BUT WE'RE SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL. WE ARE SET BACK FROM C3, THE, UH, C3, UH, BORDERS, UH, RID AND, AND FM 78. SO WHEN WE REACHED OUT TO THE COUNCIL PERSON'S OFFICE, AND BASICALLY WHAT THIS IS, IS A CLEANUP JOB. IT'S PART OF OUR LAND, A SMALL PORTION, 0.4 ACRES OUT OF ABOUT 15 ACRES IS ZONE C3 WE'RE I ONE. SO WHEN A BANK, AN EQUITY PARTNER AND, AND YOU HAVE ALL THESE DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOLKS, THEY, WHEN THEY SAY CC THREE, THAT'S NOT OKAY WITH THEM. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE IS TO CLEAN THIS SMALL AREA UP. BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THE ORIGINAL, WELL, WHEN THE DEVELOPER HAD IT, HE CAME IN AND HE DID, I MEAN, THEY, THEY TRIED ACTUALLY TO GET TARGET BACK HERE TO DO LIKE A SUPER, YOU KNOW, LIKE A SUPER TARGET OR, YOU KNOW, GET A RATHER LARGE TYPE ANCHOR. BUT, UH, THE MARKET WOULD NOT BEAR IT IN THIS LOCATION. UM, SO, UH, NEXT TO US, OR ACTUALLY JUST TO THE RIGHT OF THE, HAVE A, I GOT A POINTER, SORRY. UH, THIS AREA RIGHT HERE, THIS IS ALL INDUSTRIAL. UM, THIS IS ACTUALLY THE DETENTION POND, UH, SERVING, YOU KNOW, THESE AREAS OVER HERE THAT'S INDUSTRIAL. THAT'S INDUSTRIAL AND WE'RE PROPOSING OR WE'RE GONNA COME IN AND BUILD OUR BUILDING. UH, WE'RE JUST TRYING NOT TO HAVE TO GET THIS GUY TO GO BACK AND GO FIND ANOTHER LENDER OVER THIS ISSUE. 'CAUSE THIS IS AN ISSUE WITH HIS LENDER. UM, BUT BACK ON RIMAN ROAD, THIS IS, THIS IS THIS VERY BIG INDUSTRIAL PARK WHERE ACTUALLY, UH, UPS IS LOCATED. IF ANY OF YOU HAVE, HAVE EVER BEEN BACK THERE. UH, THE LAND USE PLAN IS, UH, FROM 2008. IT'S, IT'S A, I I'D CALL IT A, YOU KNOW WHAT, 16 YEARS OLD. SO, UM, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS JUST NOT GONNA HAPPEN. UM, AND IT ALREADY HASN'T HAPPENED. UM, UH, COUNCIL PERSON'S OFFICE, THEY WERE FINE WITH IT. UH, THEY WERE COMPLETELY FINE. UH, WHAT, WHAT WOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN OUR SUPPORT OR WOULD'VE HAD THE COUNCIL'S, UH, OFFICE OBJECT IS IF WE WERE TRYING TO DO INDUSTRIAL ALONG MANN, WHICH IS WHAT THEY AND, AND THEIR DISTRICT DO NOT WANT. AND THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DOING. UM, THIS ODD PIECE RIGHT HERE IS SIMPLY A LEFTOVER PIECE THAT WALGREENS DID NOT WANT, ACCORDING TO THE DEVELOPER WHO DEVELOPED AND SOLD ALL OF THESE LOTS. UM, THIS IS REALLY, THIS IS THE MOST COMPLICATED, UH, SMALL EASY LAND USE CHANGE I'VE EVER DONE OR ZONING CHANGE. I WAS VERY SURPRISED TO GET A STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL, BUT AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THEY JUST, THEY WANT TO KIND OF STAY OUT OF THAT UNLESS EVERYBODY'S INVOLVED WHEN IT'S A BIG LAND USE, YOU KNOW, CHANGE. WE'RE, WE'RE STAKEHOLDERS AND EVERYBODY'S INVOLVED. SO DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH, I'LL, UH, START DOWN WITH COMMISSIONER LOPEZ. NO [00:15:01] QUESTION. YEAH. SO, UH, I HAVE A QUESTION. SO THIS, WE'RE USED TO SEEING ZONING THAT RIDES LOT LINES AND WITH THIS CASE, UH, ON THAT NORTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY, IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'VE, YOU'VE GOT C3 THAT, THAT IS TAKING UP PIECES OF LOTS IN SOME, IN SOME INSTANCES. AND SO YOU'RE, YOU'RE USE, YOU'RE USING IT AS AN I 180% OF YOUR, YOUR PLATTED LOT IS AN I ONE AND YOU'RE JUST TRYING TO GET THE LAST 20% ZONED I ONE, RIGHT? UH, IT, IT, IT IT'S PROBABLY MORE LIKE 5%. OKAY. KNOW FIVE PERCENTS, HERE'S THE PLAT. THEY'LL PUT THE PLAT UP ON THE SCREEN SO YOU CAN SEE THE OWNERSHIP. WE'RE WE'RE, WE'RE JUST TRYING TO GET THE PROPERTY, UH, THE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND ZONING. OH, THIS IS YOUR PROJECT TO MATCH. OKAY. I WAS LOOKING AT THE EXISTING YES, WE HAVE A PLAID IN THERE. YEAH, I DIDN'T SEE THAT. SO YEAH, YOU, THAT'S A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY THAT'S ZONED I ONE EXCEPT FOR THIS PIECE. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER GARCIA. HAS THIS GONE BEFORE THE, UH, THE COMMISSION, YOUR COMMISSION ZONING? NO, ON . OKAY. YEAH. ZONING. IS THAT YOUR QUESTION? SO THIS IS THE FIRST STEP. IT'LL GO TO ZONING NEXT WEEK. THANK YOU MR. MILAM. SO THE ENTRANCES WOULD BE OFF OF, UH, WOODLAKE? YES, MA'AM. WELL, ACTUALLY THERE'S, THERE'S ALREADY AN ENTRANCE. UH, THERE'S A SMALL ENTRANCE, THAT LITTLE ONE OFF RID MINUTE IT LOOKS LIKE DOWN TOWARDS THE BOTTOM LEFT. WE DO FLAG DOWN AND THERE IS AN EASEMENT THERE. UH, AND IN OUR PLANS WE ACCESS THAT BACK ROAD AND THEN ALSO WOOD LAKE, WOOD LAKE CENTER. SO, BUT YES, THEY, THEY HAVE ACCESS THERE AS WELL. BUT THAT'S, THAT'S NOT WHERE THEIR GATES WILL BE BECAUSE IT'LL BE GATED IN THE REAR. THE ISSUE IN HAND IS JUST THE LENDER HAS, UH, A PROBLEM WITH, WITH THE C3. YEAH. THEY DON'T WANNA FINANCE A, A PROJECT, AN INDUSTRIAL PROJECT WHERE A SMALL PART OF IT IS C3. THEY, THAT, THAT MAKES THEM VERY NERVOUS AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPER'S EQUITY PARTNER. YES, SIR. UM, AND ALSO WHAT THIS WILL DO IS THIS WILL CLEAN UP THE ZONING AT LEAST. I MEAN, WE HAVE TO COME HERE FOR LAND USE CHANGE, BUT IT'LL AT LEAST CLEAN UP THE ZONING MAP AND MAKE IT CONCURRENT TO WHAT'S ACTUALLY OUT THERE AND WHAT'S GONNA BE THERE FOR 50 YEARS. SO, YEAH. UH, WITH RESPECT TO THE CITY, I UNDERSTAND THEIR RECOMMENDATION. AS YOU MENTIONED, THIS IS AN OLD SECTOR PLAN AND WHEN SA TOMORROW COMES THROUGH THAT THIS IS PROBABLY GONNA BE MORE OF, OF INDUSTRIAL LAND USES. SO, AND JUST TO BE CLEAR, UH, THE ORIGINAL REQUESTS WE'RE MODIFYING TO ONLY SHOW WHAT WILL BE THE MEETS AND BOUNDS FOR THAT PIECE. YES, SIR. SO THIS, THIS IS THE EXHIBIT WITH FIELD NOTES, UH, FOR WHAT WE NEED TO CHANGE. OKAY. JUST MAKING SURE WE MAKE OUR MOTION THAT, THAT, THAT ONLY THIS PIECE WOULD BE CHANGED TO, UH, INDUSTRIAL. YES, SIR. AND I GUESS AT SOME LATER TIME THE LAND USE WOULD BE, UH, YOU KNOW, CLEANED UP, UH, AT SOME LATER DATE. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY'RE AT ON THE PROCESS FOR SA TOMORROW, BUT, UM, I, I HAVE NO ISSUES WITH THAT. I, YOU KNOW, WE COULD LEAVE THIS AS INDUSTRIAL, LIKE WE HAVE IT RIGHT NOW. OUR ORIGINAL REQUEST, I JUST, THIS WHEN, WHEN I GOT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL. MM-HMM. , YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY STARTS ASKING QUESTIONS AND GETTING CONCERNED AND, AND SO I'M LIKE, WELL, IF WE NEED TO, WE CAN SHRINK IT DOWN. I WOULD PROBABLY JUST LIKE TO LEAVE IT AS YOU KNOW, AS IT IS, WE COULD SHRINK IT DOWN TO THAT. UH, BUT IT'S, YOU KNOW, THAT'S UP TO Y'ALL. OKAY. SO WE HAVE TO TAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO ACCEPT AS APPLIED, UH, TO CHANGE TO, UH, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL. DID YOU, I'M SORRY, SAY THAT AGAIN? UH, I MOTION TO, UH, APPROVE AS A, AS ORIGINALLY APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE PARCEL. YEAH. THE, THE, THE EXISTING PLATTED LOT WAS WHAT HE SUBMITTED, SO. OKAY. I WOULD JUST KEEP IT LIKE THAT. OKAY. AND JUST TO CONFIRM, YOU WANNA CHANGE IT FROM REGIONAL COMMERCIAL TO INDUSTRIAL? THAT IS CORRECT. I APOLOGIZE. I READ THE WRONG TERM. SECOND. SO MOTION, UH, TO SUPPORT APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL TO BE CHANGED. PLAN USE TO INDUSTRIAL MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ORIAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA. SO JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE ENTIRE PARCEL INCLUDES THE I ONE AND THE C3, WHICH IS HIGHLIGHTED HERE. CORRECT. [00:20:01] OKAY. THE ORIGINAL REQUEST IS THE ORIGINAL REQUEST AGENDA. THE ORIGINAL, NOT THE AMENDMENT REQUEST. WE CAN PUT THE MAP BACK ON THE SCREEN SO YOU, YOU'RE WE'RE CLEAR. NOT THE AMENDED. THIS WOULD BE THE ORIGINAL REQUEST. THE APPLICANT'S ORIGINAL REQUEST, WHICH IS THE BOUNDARY ON THE SCREEN. OKAY. THANK YOU. THAT'S WHAT'S IN, UH, FOR THE MOTION. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING. CAN WE TAKE A, UH, VOTE PLEASE. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? YES. COMMISSIONER GARCIA? YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI? YES. COMMISSIONER LOPEZ? YES. COMMISSIONER MILAM? YES. CHAIR PROFIT? YES. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. UH, MINUTES [Approval of Minutes  ] FROM THE LAST MEETING. ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONER CHANGES TO THE MINUTES? HEARING NONE. I'LL TAKE A MOTION. MOVE TO APPROVE. SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES BY COMMISSIONER MILAM. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ORIAN. COMMISSIONER MILAM? YES. COMMISSIONER ORIAN? YES. COMMISSIONER LOPEZ? YES. COMMISSIONER ZUKI? YES. COMMISSIONER GARCIA? YES. CHAIR PROPHET? YES. MINUTES PASS. DO WE HAVE A DIRECTOR'S [Director’s Report  ] REPORT TODAY? UH, NO UPDATE OTHER THAN WHAT WE ALREADY DISCUSSED IN THE WORK SESSION, WHICH WAS ABOUT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. AND WE'LL KEEP YOU UPDATED ON WHEN THAT WILL BE AT GOVERNANCE. APPRECIATE IT. AND IF WE NEED TO SEND Y'ALL AN EMAIL, WE WILL. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. UH, IT IS 2 21 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.