[00:00:02]
[Call to Order]
UM, THE TIME IS 9:15 AM TODAY IS THE 8TH OF AUGUST OF 2019.SO COULD WE GET A, A ROLL CALL PLEASE? MS. BROWN? HERE.
I'M GONNA READ THE CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT NOW.
PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONE OR ANY DEVICE THAT MAY DISRUPT THIS MEETING.
NO PERSON ATTENDING THIS MEETING SHALL DELAY OR DISRUPT THE PROCEEDINGS OR DISOBEY THE ORDER OF THE CHAIR.
PLEASE REMAIN IN YOUR SEAT UNTIL YOUR CASE IS CALLED.
THE CITY WILL PROVIDE TRANSLATION SERVICES, WHICH NOW WE'LL SHOW A LITTLE VIDEO ABOUT THE TRANSLATION SERVICES.
THESE SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ANYONE NEEDING ASSISTANCE.
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON A CASE, PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME ON THE PERSONS TO BE HEARD SHEET AND YOU WILL BE ALLOWED.
PLEASE KEEP ALL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION AND THE CODE VIOLATION.
YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS THE PROPERTY OWNER IS OR LIEN HOLDER OF A DANGEROUS STRUCTURED CASE IS TO DEMONSTRATE THE FOLLOWING, EXCUSE ME.
SHOW A DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK WITH THE COST FOR EACH ITEM OUTLINED IN ORDER TO BRING THE, UH, PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CODE.
OFFICER SHALL PROOF OF FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PAY FOR THE PROPOSED WORK REQUEST THE AMOUNT OF TIME NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE WORK.
ALL ABATEMENTS ORDERED BY THE BOARD SHALL BE ENFORCED.
ALL WORK, UH, PROPOSED MUST BE DONE WITHIN CODE REGULATION WITH REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK.
YOU MAY OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LOCATED IN THIS BUILDING.
IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS, PLEASE TALK TO YOUR CODE OFFICER.
ANY OWNER OR LIENHOLDER DISSATISFIED WITH THE ORDER OF THIS BOARD MAY FILE AN APPEAL IN CIVIL DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE THAT THE ORDER IS MAILED.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ORDERS, PLEASE MEET WITH A CODE OFFICER OR A STAFF MEMBER.
PLEASE NOTE THAT IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON PRESENT IN THIS BUILDING TO SOLICIT OR PEDAL SERVICES REGARDING ANY PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD DURING THE COURSE OF THIS HEARING.
AS PER CITY CODE 16 DASH 2 36.
MY NAME IS EVELYN BROWN AND I'M THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD.
[Approval of Minutes]
OKAY.UH, DO WE HAVE, DID EVERYBODY GET A CHANCE TO READ THE MINUTES? I APPROVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF 25 JULY AS PRESENTED.
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY MR. NELSON AND MR. ANDREWS SECOND.
ALL OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.
[(CD-4) 154 Lovett Ave]
WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT FROM SOMEONE.MY NAME IS DENISE HASTINGS, CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR.
I HAVE ONE ITEM TO READ INTO THE RECORD.
IT'S A WHOLE HARMLESS AGREEMENT.
THE PROPERTY OWNER LOCATED AT 1 5 4 LOVETT AVENUE COUNCIL DISTRICT FOUR HAS VOLUNTARILY AGREED TO ALLOW THE CITY TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 59, SECTION FIVE.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS NEEDED BY THE BOARD AT THIS TIME.
[4. 19-5897 (CD-3) 434 Conner]
FIRST CASE WILL BE 4 34 CONNOR, I THINK IT'S C O N N E R.GOOD MORNING, V SS B MEMBERS FOR THE RECORD.
MY NAME'S RAMIRO GURA, DANGEROUS PREMISE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE STRUCTURE BEING PRESENTED TODAY IS LOCATED AT 4 34
[00:05:01]
CONNOR, WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX.THIS IS THE FIRST TIME 4 34 CONNOR'S BEING PRESENTED BEFORE THE BOARD.
PLEASE NOTE ON MARCH 12TH, 2019, A DANGEROUS ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TEAM INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED.
THE INSPECTION IS A COLLABORATED INSPECTION WITH A VARIETY OF CITY DEPARTMENTS THAT INCLUDED THE SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS N CCB 6 0 8 0 BLOCK ONE, LOT 16.
IT'S LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE.
THE OWNER AND RECORD IS THEMA LAN, EXCUSE ME, THEMA LAN WITH A MAIL ADDRESS OF 4 34 CONNOR, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 4.
THERE IS NO OWNER PRESENT HERE TODAY.
DOES THE BOARD WISH TO PROCEED? YES, WE DO.
THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFIRMED ON MARCH 8TH, 2019.
THE PROPERTY IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION.
OUR FIRST INSPECTION REGARDING 4 34 CONNOR WAS CONDUCTED ON MARCH 12TH, 2019.
THE ORIGINAL NOTICE WAS MAILED ON MARCH 13TH, 2019, AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED ON MARCH 20TH, 2019.
ON JULY 24TH, 2019, A PRE-BOARD CONFERENCE HEARING WAS HELD WITH THE, WITH NO ONE ATTENDING THE HEARING ON JULY 24TH.
ALSO, THE NOTICE OF THE B S B HEARING WAS ALSO POSTED AT 4 34 CONNOR ON JULY 24TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR THE B S B HEARING WAS MAILED TO TAMALES T LAN AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED, NOT DELIVERABLE ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
ON MARCH 12TH, 2019 AND JULY 10TH, 2019, UH, ADMINISTRATIVE WARRANTS WERE EXECUTED TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS AND OBTAIN PHOTOS, UH, TO PROVIDE BEFORE B S B.
NO SCOPE OF WORK OR FINANCIAL PROOF OR LETTER OF CREDIT OR ENGINEER'S REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
UH, THERE'S ONLY ONE PERMIT, UM, ON RECORD AND THAT WAS BACK IN 1998.
AND THAT WAS FOR A METER LOOP PANEL.
UM, INSTALLATION 4 34, CONNOR IS WITHIN A THOUSAND FEET AND IT ACTUALLY A BUTS, UM, NOX EARLY CHILDHOOD CAMPUS, WHICH IS LOCATED AT 3 0 2 TIPTON, UH, STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
AND AGAIN, IT'S DIRECTLY BEHIND IT.
IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE MAP, YOU CAN SEE HERE THIS IS THE SCHOOL.
ANY ISSUES WITH OUR MOUSE HERE? JUST A MOMENT.
SO 4 34 CORNER'S HERE AND IT ACTUALLY ABUTS THE SCHOOL RIGHT HERE.
THERE IS NO, UH, ELECTRICAL SERVICES.
THERE'S NO WATER SERVICES, AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE CALLS FOR, UM, CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
UM, SS A P D IS HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
UH, THE PHOTOS TAKEN WERE, UH, BEING PROVIDED WERE FROM MARCH 12TH, 2019, AND JULY 10TH, 2019.
SO WE'LL GO AND LOOK AT THE PHOTO PRESENTATION.
UM, THE PROPERTY IS KNOWN, UH, FOR HAVING SQUATTERS THERE.
UM, THE IDEA HERE IS THAT SQUATTERS JUST TOOK OVER THE HOME.
UM, THERE HAS BEEN NO CONTACT WHATSOEVER WITH ANY OF THE OWNERS.
UM, IT'S ACTUALLY BELIEVED THAT THE OWNER MIGHT BE DECEASED AND IT APPEARS THAT THEY JUST, JUST CAME IN AND TOOK OVER THE HOME OR ACTUALLY LIVING THERE WITH FURNITURE.
YOU CAN SEE SOME SMOKE DAMAGE HERE.
UM, THEY WERE ACTUALLY COOKING INSIDE THE HOUSE, UH, WITH A BARBECUE PIT.
UM, SO THERE'S A LOT OF SMOKE, UH, INSIDE SMOKE DAMAGE, UM, CHARRING INSIDE.
UM, SO THE, THE AROMA OF THE SMOKE, UH, WAS VERY STRONG WHEN YOU ENTERED THE STRUCTURE.
SO WE'RE LOOKING AT THE, UM, LEMME GO BACK HERE ONE.
SO YOU SEE THE NORTH ELEVATION HERE OF THE STRUCTURE.
YOU SEE SOME SIGNIFICANT SAGGING RIGHT HERE.
AND AS YOU SEE IN THE PHOTO PRESENTATION, YOU'RE GONNA SEE THAT'S DUE TO THE, THE FOUNDATION POSTS ARE SINKING.
AND THERE IS, UM, SOME SIGNIFICANT, UM, BEAMS THAT HAVE, HAVE, UH, HAVE FRACTURED.
IT IS A GABLE ROOF SYSTEM AND YOU CAN SEE THE ATTEMPTS TO COVER UP, UH, THE ROOF COVERING THERE.
UM, THAT'S JUST EVIDENT THROUGHOUT THE INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE.
THERE'S A LOT OF, UH, WATER DAMAGE, FALLING SHEET ROCK, UM, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THEY JUST TRY TO KIND OF PATCH THAT
[00:10:01]
UP.THERE'S THE, UH, NORTH ELEVATION AND YOU CAN SEE RIGHT HERE THERE'S SOME MISSING WOOD PLANKS.
NOW YOU CAN SEE HERE THE, THERE'S A TOTAL FRACTURE RIGHT HERE IN THE SEAL PLATE.
UM, YOU SEE THE, THE FLOOR JOIST HERE.
THERE'S A LOT OF ROT DETERIORATION.
AND THIS IS CAUSING THE FOUNDATION TO BE UNLEVEL ON THE INTERIOR.
AND IT'S EVIDENT WHEN YOU'RE WALKING THROUGH IT.
IT JUST ENDS THERE 'CAUSE IT'S, IT, IT HAS COLLAPSED AND FRACTURED THERE.
SO IT, IT DOESN'T CONTINUE TO THE NEXT POST.
AND, AND LIKE I SAID, THERE'S, UH, TWISTING IN THE, IN THE OTHER JOISTS, YOU CAN SEE THE STUDS ALONG AFTER IT WHERE THEY REST ON THAT SEAL PLATE THAT'S COLLAPSED.
THOSE STUDS ARE ALSO DETERIORATING.
SO THE FRAME IS ALSO DETERIORATING IN, UM, IN MAJOR PORTIONS OF THE STRUCTURE.
THIS IS BACK ON MARCH 12TH, 2019.
UM, THERE WAS OCCUPIED AT THAT TIME.
LIKE I SAID, THERE WERE SQUATTERS IN THERE.
UNSAFE MEANS OF EGRESS AND EGRESS.
UM, AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S DUE TO, UM, SOME SMOKE DAMAGE.
LOOKED LIKE THERE WERE MAYBE LIGHTING FIRES IN THERE TO STAY WARM.
SO THERE'S, YOU CAN SEE IT'S KIND OF CHARRED UP THERE.
FLOOR IS UNLEVEL AND YOU CAN SEE HOW THE STRUCTURE'S BEEN VANDALIZED.
JUST A LOT OF THE SHEET ROCK'S BEEN RIPPED OUT.
UM, THIS IS BACK ON JULY 10TH AND I'LL COME UP HERE TO SHOW YOU SOME PHOTOS.
UH, WHEN IT WAS OCCUPIED, AGAIN, A LOT OF EVERYTHING, THE COPPER'S BEEN STOLEN, UM, FROM THE ELECTRICAL.
YOU CAN SEE HERE THEY HAD A LOT OF THIS TYPE OF NETTING.
IT WAS AT ONE TIME WHITE AND YOU CAN SEE THE CHARRING.
AND THAT WAS DUE TO WHEN THEY WERE COOKING INSIDE WITH BARBECUE CUP PITS, OBVIOUSLY, 'CAUSE THEY DIDN'T HAVE GAS, THEY DIDN'T HAVE UTILITIES TO, TO, UH, FOR COOKING FACILITIES.
UM, THE PICTURE'S TAKEN IN BLACK AND WHITE.
SO YOU CAN SEE THE NATURAL LIGHT THAT'S ENTERING THE STRUCTURE FROM AN INTERIOR.
SO THERE'S JUST LACK OF PROTECTION FROM THE ELEMENTS.
THIS IS THE DAY THE, THE INSPECTION.
AND YOU CAN SEE UP HERE THERE'S, THERE WAS CARDBOARD AGAINST SOME OF THAT NETTING THAT WAS UP THERE.
AND A LOT OF THAT WAS JUST, UM, CHARRED WITH SMOKE DAMAGE.
YOU CAN SEE CHARRED OVER HERE, JUST SOME FROM THAT SMOKE DAMAGE.
AND I'LL ADD, THERE WAS, UM, SOME OF THIS, THE FRONT ROOM WAS BLOCKED OFF, UM, TO THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE SO YOU COULDN'T GET TO THE OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ROOM FROM HERE.
YOU WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO GO AROUND.
AND THEN WHEN YOU WENT AROUND, THERE WAS ACTUALLY OTHER PEOPLE LIVING BACK THERE.
THERE WERE NEEDLES, LEMME GO BACK.
THIS WAS ALSO MARCH 12TH, THE DAY OF THE DART.
THIS IS THE AMOUNT OF TRASH THAT THESE PEOPLE WERE ACCUMULATING IN THE BACKYARD.
AND AGAIN, IT WAS RIGHT BEHIND, UH, THE SCHOOL THAT DAY.
MARCH 12TH, WE DID ABATE THE PROPERTY.
WE BOARDED AND WE CLEANED IT UP.
AND THEN ON JULY 10TH, UM, THE LAST INSPECTION THAT WE DID TO GET THE PHOTOS, WE DID BOARD THE RE RE SECURE THE STRUCTURE TO RECOUNT THE STRUCTURE.
LOOK IT AT 4 34, CONNOR IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56, SUBSECTIONS 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, AND 15, WHICH ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WHICH HAS ANY OR ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS HEREAFTER DESCRIBES, SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
PROVIDED THAT SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DEFECTS OF DILAPIDATION, SUBSTANDARD, OR UNFITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION POSE, A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIFE, HEALTH, PROPERTY OR HUMAN SAFETY STAFF RECOMMENDS DEMOLITION.
AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION FOR 4 34, CONNOR, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
AND DOES THE PANEL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE, UM, OKAY, MR. ZUNIGA, WAS THIS A PROACTIVE, IT, IT BECAME PROACTIVE.
WE HAD A HISTORY OF CODE VIOLATIONS AT THIS LOCATION.
UM, SO THERE WAS A CUMULATIVE, UH, HISTORY OF IT.
UM, AND, AND DUE TO THE RELATIONS ALONG WITH THE CRIMINAL ASPECT OF IT, UM, IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, UH, TO CONDUCT A DART INSPECTION.
[00:15:01]
UH, YEAH, BECAUSE THE ONLY THING I'VE SEEN HERE WAS THAT IT STARTED ON MARCH, 2019.THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING, UH, SECONDLY, WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO QUALIFY, UH, THIS, THIS PROPERTY, UH, FOR EMERGENCY DEMOLITION? IT'S, IT'S ALREADY GOT THE FIRE REPORT HERE AND THE LIKES, BUT WHAT WOULD IT QUALIFY? SO THE FIRE, THE FIRE DAMAGE THAT IT SUSTAINED WAS JUST SMOKE.
IT WA IT WASN'T STRUCTURALLY, UM, THAT WAS PUT IN THE STRUCTURE IN ANY DANGER OF IMMEDIATE COLLAPSE.
UM, SO NORMALLY AN EMERGENCY DEMOLITION'S GONNA REQUIRE, UM, IF ANY OF THE STRUCTURE, UM, ELEVATION, ANY OF THE WALLS, THE ROOF THAT WOULD BE PROTRUDING OUTWARD WITH DANGER OF IMMEDIATE COLLAPSE THAT'S PUTTING ANYBODY TO LIFE IN DANGER.
THEN AT THAT TIME, THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE MORE OF A, A RECOMMENDED, RECOMMENDED FOR, UH, EMERGENCY DEMOLITION.
SO THE HOMEOWNER OR THE PROPERTY HAVE BEEN COOPERATING WITH US? NO, UM, THERE HAS BEEN NO CONTACT WITH THE OWNER.
THEN IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS, WHICH WOULD TAKE QUITE A WHILE.
AND THE STINT, AS YOU SAID, IS THERE, YOU KNOW, THE SMELL OF, YOU KNOW, FOR THE, AND I SEE WHERE THE HOUSES ARE CLOSE TO EACH OTHER, YOU KNOW, NOT THE FIVE YARDS, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, BACK AND THE LEGS.
SO IT'LL TAKE A WHILE BEFORE YOU KNOW IT'S TORN DOWN SINCE YOU HAVEN'T FILED ON THE WATER.
THAT'S WHY WE ARE HERE TODAY IS THE DEMOLITION CASE EX EXACTLY.
1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, AND 15.
AND, AND THIS IS WHY I TALKING ABOUT THE HOUSE.
SO, YOU KNOW, MY, MY CONCERN WAS BECAUSE OF THE PROCESS, UH, TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY DEMOLITION.
BUT AS HE STATED, YOU KNOW, IT WAS JUST PART OF THE FIGHT WASN'T A GUTTED OUT.
AND AGAIN, UH, THE EMERGENCY WOULD BE IMMEDIATE, UM, COLLAPSE OF THE STRUCTURE, UM, FAILURE THAT SOMETHING CAN HAPPEN TO THAT STRUCTURE WOULD POSE ANY IMMEDIATE DANGER TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY.
MR. THE LAST 7 24 WAS A POST TO VACATE ON YOUR NOTES.
HAS ANYBODY BEEN THERE SINCE 7 24? NOW TO SEE IF IT'S OCCUPIED AGAIN.
'CAUSE YOU POSTED THE FIRST ONE ON THREE 18 AND APPARENTLY IT WAS TOOK DOWN 'CAUSE IT SAYS SQUATTERS ON 6 13 7 24.
IS IT? SO ON JULY 24TH, UH, WE MADE AN ATTEMPT TO, MADE AN ATTEMPT TO, UH, WELL WE POSTED THE, THE, THE, THE NOTICE FOR THE HEARING AT WHICH TIME WE ALSO POST, UM, THE B S B PACKET.
AND WE MADE AN ATTEMPT TO SEE IF THE OWNER WAS THERE.
UM, THE OWNER WAS NOT THERE AT THAT TIME.
THERE I WILL BE OPENING UP A CASE BECAUSE THAT FRONT BOARD HAS BEEN REMOVED.
UM, SO, BUT THE CHAIN WAS LOCKED, SO WE'LL HAVE TO BE, UH, HAVE TO GO BACK AND GET A WARRANT TO CONDUCT ANOTHER INSPECTION TO SEE IF THAT THAT DOOR IS ACTUALLY SECURE.
HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY.
OKAY, WE HAVE, UM, OFFICER SOMERVILLE STATE YOUR NAME AND UH, ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PLEASE.
I'M OFFICER RICHARD SOMERVILLE.
I'M SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER.
I'M WITH THE SOUTH SAFE UNIT AND I WORK OUT OF SOUTH SUBSTATION AT SEVEN 11 WEST MAYFIELD.
UM, I, I HAVE THIS DISTRICT, I HAVE THIS AREA FOR PROBABLY ABOUT SIX YEARS, SO I'M KIND OF FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION.
UM, THE CALLS THAT WE GET FOR THIS, THIS RESIDENCE HAVE BEEN BURGLARY, STOLEN PROPERTY, UH, DISTURBANCES.
AND IT'S KNOWN FOR HAVING SQUATTERS.
UM, WE, WE RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE SCHOOL THAT WAS LOCATED RIGHT BY, RIGHT BEHIND THIS HOUSE.
UM, THE ADMINISTRATION HAD SAID THAT THEY WERE STEALING ELECTRICITY, THAT THEY HAD SUSPICIOUS PEOPLE COMING ONTO THE SCHOOL PROPERTY.
SO THEY ASKED IF WE WOULD PARK BACK THERE DURING SCHOOL HOURS BECAUSE, UH, THE KIDS WERE, WERE SCARED.
UM, I'VE BEEN THERE WITH DART TO, FOR THE ASSESSMENT.
UM, WE CONTACTED THE PEOPLE THAT LIVED THERE.
UM, WE'VE BEEN TOLD WHILE WE WERE THERE, WE WERE TOLD BY OTHER NEIGHBORS THAT, UH, THE PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS HOUSE ARE KNOWN FOR STEALING FROM THE, FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, THEY'RE KNOWN DRUG ADDICTS.
UH, THE, WE WENT BACK AND I, I DON'T KNOW HOW, I DON'T HAVE THE DATE.
WHEN WE WENT BACK AFTER IT WAS SECURED AND, AND CLOSED AND LOCKED UP, BUT THERE WAS SQUATTERS INSIDE, UM, THAT WE HAD TO, TO TELL TO LEAVE AGAIN.
UM, I WAS IN THERE AND I, I DID SEE THE, THE, THE BURN DAMAGE, AND I DID SEE THE SMELL.
[00:20:01]
THIS HOUSE HAS BEEN, HAS BEEN KNOWN FOR, FOR A LOT OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.IS THAT, IS THAT ALL? YES, MA'AM.
UH, DOES THE PANEL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF OFFICER? I GOT TWO THINGS.
AND DID YOU OR ANY OF THE OTHER OFFICERS HAVE LOOKED CONTACTING THE OWNERS? NO.
THE, UM, THE SQUAD OR THE PERSON THAT WAS STAYING THERE, THE FEMALE, UM, SHE HAD DOCTORED UP SOME PAPERWORK THAT SAID THAT SHE WAS RENTING, BUT IT WAS JUST, IT WAS JUST SOME WORDS AND PENCIL THAT SHE WROTE, WROTE DOWN.
BUT WE NEVER CONTACTED NO OWNER.
OWNER GIVE HER LEGITIMACY TO BE ON THE PROPERTY.
BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T, SHE JUST DID THAT SO SHE COULD STAY ON THE PROPERTY.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 34 O'CONNOR, UH, TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56 SUBSECTIONS 1, 2 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, AND 15 FOR THE REASONS AS STATED BY THE CODE OFFICER AND THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT FEASIBLE OF BEING REPAIRED AND IT BE DEMOLISHED IN 30 DAYS AND VACATED IMMEDIATELY AND STAY VACANT UNTIL DEMOLISHED
BECAUSE IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT CODE OFFICER WENT BY THIS MORNING AND IT WAS UNSECURED TO RESECURE, UH, ADD TO THE MOTION TO SECURE THE BUILDING.
SO, UM, WE HAVE A MOTION OF A 30 DAY, UH, DEMO.
AND, UM, WE HAVE A AMENDMENT, UH, BY MR. ANDERS FOR, TO VACATE IMMEDIATELY.
AND WE HAVE A SECOND BY, UM, MR. ZUNIGA.
SO, UH, CORRECTION, MY AMENDMENT WAS TO SECURE THE PROPERTY.
THE VACATE WAS MADE BY, UH, MR. NELSON.
UH, MR. NELSON MADE THE, THE MOTION AND THE AMENDMENT TO SECURE THE PROPERTY OR TO VACATE THE PROPERTY.
AND MR. ANDERS MADE THE, UM, YOU MADE THE MOTION TO VACATE.
DID, I MADE THE MOTION TO SECURE, SECURE IT.
SO SECURING WAS BY MR. ANDERS.
VACATE WAS ADDED TO THE MOTION BY, UH, MR. NELSON.
ALRIGHT, SO IS ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY.
ALL OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.
[3. 19-5896 (CD-5) 3039 Chihuahua St]
OUR NEXT CASE IS, UM, FOR THE RECORD MENU.3 0 3 9 CHIHUAHUA FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS ROLAND ALONSO, DANGEROUS PREMISES OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE STRUCTURE BEING PRESENTED TODAY IS LOCATED AT 30 39 CHIHUAHUA STREET WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY COURT.
THIS CASE IS THE FIRST TIME BEING HEARD BEFORE THIS BOARD.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS N C B 7 1 24 BLOCK FIVE, BLOCK 21 AND 22 LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE.
THE OWNER ON RECORD IS LOZANO MANUEL DI ETAL WITH A MAILING ADDRESS OF 30 39 CHIHUAHUA STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 7.
ALL NOTICES OF HEARING WERE PROPERLY ISSUED IS REQUIRED.
THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS ARE PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THIS CASE.
THE OWNER OF RECORD IS NOT PRESENT TODAY.
DOES THE BOARD WISH TO PROCEED? YES, WE DO.
THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HAS CONFIRMED ON 4 10 19 AND PROPERTY IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION.
THE FOLLOWING IS A TIMELINE OF EVENTS REGARDING THE NOTIFICATION PROCESS.
FIRST INSPECTION REGARDING 30 39
ORIGINAL NOTICE WAS MAILED ON 2 28, UH, 18, AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON CLAIM ON 3 30 18 ON 2 29 19.
THE NOTICE FOR B S B HEARING WAS POSTED AT 30 39 CHIHUAHUA STREET ON 2 26 19.
THE NOTICE FOR B SS B HEARING WAS MAILED TO MANUEL D LOZANO AND THE CERTIFICATE, THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON A TWO 19 UNCLAIMED.
THIS IS A SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE.
IT IS, UM, THE PICTURES WILL SHOW THAT THE ROOF IS DAMAGED, THE FRAME AND THE FOUNDATION ARE DAMAGED.
THIS IS THE FRONT VIEW OF THE HOUSE AND,
[00:25:07]
UM, IT IS LEANING, UM, TOWARDS THIS WAY AND THEN TOWARDS, UM, TOWARDS THE FRONT, WHICH THE PICTURES WILL SHOW.UM, HERE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE HOUSE HERE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE, THE WALL IS, UH, KICKING IN SOME DAMAGE HERE AT THE BOTTOM.
GET A LITTLE CLOSER LOOK HERE AND SEE WHAT'S GOING ON.
UH, RIGHT AWAY YOU NOTICE A SAG IN THE ROOF HERE WITH SOME STRUCTURAL ISSUES HERE.
AND THE FRAME HERE AND THE BOTTOM HERE, GET A LITTLE CLOSER.
AND IT LOOKS LIKE HERE AT THE BOTTOM HERE, THE, THE FRAME IS KICKING IN HERE.
SO IT'S GOT SOME STRUCTURAL, UH, PROBLEMS THERE.
UH, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE ROOF DOES HAVE SIGNIFICANT HERE, UH, SAGGING GOING DOWNWARDS.
HERE'S A LOOK FROM THE REAR, HAS THIS PATIO HERE WITH ITS COVERING HERE, AND IT IS DAMAGED FROM THE DECKING HERE.
GET A LITTLE CLOSER, LOOK AT THE DECKING AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT HAS WATER DAMAGE, LIKE IT'S GETTING WORSE.
UM, AS TIME GOES, THE WATER'S JUST TAKING ITS TOE ON THE, ON THE ROOF THERE AND LOOKING AT THAT FROM THE REAR, UH, TO THE RIGHT SIDE AGAIN, UH, THIS WAY.
AND, UH, I COULD SEE HERE WHERE THE WALL IS KICKING IN.
GET A LITTLE, UH, CLOSER LOOK TO LOOK AT THE OVERHANG HERE.
I NOTICED RIGHT AWAY THAT THE FLOORS WERE ROLLING TOWARDS THE FRONT, PUT THE LEVEL DOWN TO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON.
AND UH, IT JUST GOT WORSE AND WORSE AS I WALKED, UH, TOWARDS THE MIDDLE.
AND THEN TOWARDS THE FRONT, I DID SEE SOME WATER DAMAGE ON THE CEILINGS AND, UH, AT THE CORNERS.
I DID SEE SOME, UM, WHERE IT IS NOT SQUARE, STARTING TO SHIFT DOWN AT THE FLOORS.
UH, I DID SEE, UH, EVIDENCE OF WATER DAMAGE.
THE, THE BATHROOM AREA, IT HAS NO WATER AND IT HAS NO ELECTRICITY.
UH, BUT IT DOES HAVE PEOPLE, UH, HANGING OUT HERE ON A DAILY BASIS.
AND HERE'S JUST THE LEVEL WAY OFF THERE.
THIS IS A SINGLE STORY RES RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.
FOUNDATION POSTS AND BEAMS ARE DAMAGED, ROOF IS DAMAGED, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DAMAGED.
FLOORS AND CEILINGS ARE DAMAGED.
THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 30 39 CHIHUAHUA STREET IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER 6 1 56, SUBSECTIONS 5 12 15 IN WHICH ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, WHICH AS ANY OR ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS YOU'RE IN AFTER DESCRIBED, SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
PROVIDED THAT SUCH CONDITIONS OF DEFECTS OF DILAPIDATION, SUBSTANDARD, OR OWN FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION POSES A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIVE HEALTH, PROPERTY OR HUMAN SAFETY STAFF RECOMMENDS DEMOLITION.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION OF 30 39 C WELL STREET.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? I GOT 'EM.
THAT THERE WAS AN ORDER TO VACATE.
IS THERE STILL ANYBODY ON THE PROPERTY NOW? UM, IT, IT'S, THEY'RE, THEY'RE IN AND OUT AND, UM, I I PASS BY THERE AND, AND DURING THE DAYTIME AND, AND THERE'S NOBODY THERE.
AND THEN LATER IN THE EVENING PEOPLE START SHOWING UP AND HANGING OUT ON THE OUTSIDE.
SO IT'S JUST ONE OF THOSE, UM, THINGS, UH, HOUSES WHERE THERE'S ACTIVITY AND, YOU KNOW, THEY TRY TO KEEP IT LOW KEY, BUT THE PEOPLE COMING IN AND OUT IS, IS OBVIOUS.
SO THERE'S STILL ACTIVITY THERE? YES, SIR.
HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? QUESTION? YEAH.
UH, YOU HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO, UH, GET AHOLD OF, UH, THE TRUSTEE FOR THAT ESTATE? OR IS IT THE BROTHER MR. LOZANO? IT'S THE BROTHER ROLAND LOZANO.
UM, HE'S, HE'S THE ONE THAT, UM, THAT HANGS AROUND THERE OR
[00:30:01]
STAYS THERE AT TIMES.AND HE'S THE ONE THAT I'VE BEEN TALKING TO.
UH, THE, THE OWNER NAME IS MAN, IS IT THE OWNER THAT IS LISTED UNDER IS MANUEL LOZANO.
AND, UM, HE HAS NOT COME FORWARD, UH, TO SPEAK TO ME.
UH, SO ROLAND IS ONE OF THE, ROLAND IS ONE OF THE BROTHERS THAT'S, THAT'S THERE AND, AND HE'S THE ONE THAT I'VE BEEN ASSOCIATING WITH.
HAS HE TOLD YOU WHO'S TAKEN IT, THE TRUSTEE ON IT? UH, AND, AND MY MY CONCERN IS THAT WE MIGHT BE SENDING THE LETTERS, YOU KNOW, OUT THERE AND, UH, AND THE, THE MAIN PERSON'S NOT GETTING THEM.
BUT YEAH, HE, HE DOES, UM, HE DOES RELAY THE MESSAGES THAT I KNOW TO HIM.
MS. AND MS. CHAIR, JUST TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE CLEAR, LEGAL DOES A, A FULL, UM, TITLE SEARCH ON THE PROPERTY.
ANYBODY ASSOCIATED WITH THAT PROPERTY, ANYBODY ASSOCIATED WITH IT ALL GETS NOTICE OF IT? UH, THERE'S A LIST, UH, IN YOUR PACKET.
I BELIEVE IT STARTS ON PAGE TWO OF ALL PERSONS THAT ARE NOTIFIED IN REGARDS TO, UH, THIS PROPERTY.
DID THAT HELP YOU, JESSE? YES.
UH, THERE'S A PERSON THAT WAS WAVING OUT THERE.
WELL, IT'S, I DON'T KNOW, IT'S NOT HIS TIME YET.
WE, I'LL GET TO HIM, BUT IT'S NOT HIS TIME YET.
WE ARE STILL DEALING WITH THE OFFICER, SO, UM, LEAST I KNOW UP.
DO WE STILL, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? OKAY, THANK YOU.
WE HAVE, WE HAVE SOMEONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE PROPERTY.
MR. LOZANO, WAS IT NANCY LOZANO? SORRY, I I THINK IT'S NANCY.
YOU HAVE TO COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO, UM, STATE YOUR CASE, MA'AM.
NAME, PUT YOUR, UM, I'M SORRY.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.
MY CURRENT ADDRESS OR, UH, WHERE YOU LIVE, WHERE YOU RESIDE.
MY NAME IS NANCY ANO, I RESIDE AT 3 3 0 LA AMANDA BOULEVARD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
AND YOU WANT TO STATE YOUR CASE? UM, BASICALLY I'M HERE FOR THE HEARING AT, UM, MY DAD'S LOCATION, WHICH IS 3 0 3 9 CHIHUAHUA.
I'M SORRY, YOU, IS YOUR FATHER THE PROPERTY OWNER OR WHAT? MY BRO, WELL, THE SIBLINGS ARE MY, MY DAD IS DECEASED.
OKAY, SO YOU WANNA STATE YOUR CASE? WELL, AGAIN, I AM HEARING TO, I AM HERE BECAUSE, UM, WE WERE ADVISED ABOUT THE HEARING AT MY FATHER'S.
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ON THE CASE? DID YOU BRING IN A, A, A SCOPE OF WORK OR SOMETHING TO, TO REPAIR THE HOUSE OR WHAT, WHAT DO YOU WANNA SAY ABOUT THE HOUSE? WELL, UM, WE WERE JUST ADVISED THAT, UM, OF THE STATUS OF THE HOUSE, I WAS NOT AWARE OF HOW FAR THE, UH, OR IF ANYBODY WAS AT THAT RESIDENCE OR LIVING AT MY DAD'S RESIDENCE OR WHAT THE, THE STATUS OF MY DAD'S, UH, LOCATION STATUS WAS.
SO I'M JUST TO COMING HERE TO KIND OF, UM, AGREE WITH, UM, THAT, UH, WE ARE IN, UM, I JUST SAW THE, THE PICTURES THAT WERE SHOWN, UM, TODAY, UM, AS FAR AS BEING AWARE OF THE STATUS OF MY DAD'S PROPERTY, I WAS NOT AWARE OF IT UNTIL JUST A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO AS FAR AS, UH, UH, AWARE ABOUT THE HEARING.
SO, UM, WHAT OUR PLANS ARE IS TO DEMOLISH THE HOUSE.
I THINK THE BOARD MIGHT DO THAT TODAY, MA'AM.
DO WHAT? DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY TODAY? WELL, NOT TODAY, BUT OUR ORDER.
AND YOU ARE SIR? YEAH, IT'S MY WIFE.
YOU NEED TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR? MY NAME IS JOSE ANTONIO GARZA.
AND YOUR ADDRESS? 3 3 0 AMANDA BOULEVARD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 2.
ALRIGHT, YOU, YOU WANT TO STATE YOUR YES.
UH, BASICALLY WHAT I HEARD WAS, UH, THAT MANUEL, MY BROTHER-IN-LAW, THE ONE THAT THE TITLE IS UNDER FOR THE HOUSE, HAS NOT BEEN PRESENT.
IT'S BEEN ON THE FAMILY TO GO AHEAD AND HAVE IT DEMOLISHED BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING BETTER FOR EVERYBODY WHERE WE CAN HAVE THE LOT CLEAN AND THE SPACE NICE.
[00:35:01]
NOBODY GOES IN THERE ANYMORE.SO THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I WANTED TO POINT OUT SINCE YOU WERE ASKING ABOUT HIM NOT COMING FORWARD, I JUST WANT TO KIND OF REPRESENT HIM BECAUSE HE AGREES WITH IT.
AND, UM, IT'S NOT JUST NANCY, HER OLDER SISTER IS HERE, NORMA LOZANO ALSO, AND THEN, UM, SO THEY'RE ALL AGREEING ON DOING IT.
SO WE'RE AGREEING TO DEMOLISH, HAVE THE HOUSE DEMOLISHED.
YEAH, Y'ALL HAVE TO SPEAK IN THE MICROPHONE AND ONLY ONE CAN SPEAK AT A TIME.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.
MY NAME IS NORMA LOZANO AND I RESIDE AT 7 3 1 4 CY HILL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 5 0.
AND WHAT DO YOU WANNA SAY, MA'AM? WELL, I JUST WANNA SAY THAT WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING A PERMIT.
WE HAVE CONTRACTOR THAT IS GOING TO, UH, GET A PERMIT AS WE SPEAK TO DEMOLISH THE HOUSE.
ALRIGHT, THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH.
OKAY, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE THAT THE BOARD, THAT THE PROPERTY AT 3 0 3 9 CHIHUAHUA STREET IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56, SUBSECTION 5, 12 15 FOR THE MAIN AS A CODE OFFICER STATED, AND THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNFEASIBLE TO BE REPAIRED AND THAT IT IS A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIFE, HEALTH, SAFETY, OR PROPERTY.
AND THAT IT BE DEMOLISHED WITHIN 30 DAYS, VACATED IMMEDIATELY AND SECURED.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. ANDERS, AND WE, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. ANDERS FOR A 30 DAY, UM, DEMO, VACATE AND SECURE.
AND WE HAVE A, A SECOND BY TWO PEOPLE, UM, MR. ANDERS, I MEAN, SORRY,
SO, UM, DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? I'M, I'M SORRY SIR.
I'M SORRY, BUT WE'VE ALREADY, WE'RE IN IN THE PROCESS OF YES, YOU CAN'T OKAY.
OH, DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? THAT'S WHERE I WAS.
OPPOSED? AND THE AYES HAVE IT.
[5. 19-5898 (CD-1) 640 Kentucky Ave (rehearing)]
NEXT CASE IS, UM, 1326 ELVIRA STREET, SIX 40 KENTUCKY.THE, UH, REPRESENTATIVES OF, UH, KENTUCKY ARE NOT HERE.
I WAS TRYING TO REACH THEM AGAIN BY PHONE, BUT YOU CAN CONTINUE.
FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS ELISA VALDEZ, DANGEROUS PERMIT OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE STRUCTURE BEING PRESENTED TODAY IS LOCATED AT SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE WITH ACCOMMODATION FOR DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX.
THIS CASE IS, THIS CASE IS A RE-HEARING WITH A PREVIOUS DEMO MILITIAN ORDER IT ISSUED IN JANUARY 25TH, 2018.
ON AUGUST 31ST, 2018, A PERSON OF INTEREST, MR. MARCO HERNANDEZ CAME INTO AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO TO REPAIR THE STRUCTURE.
MR. HERNANDEZ FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CITY AGREEMENT TO REPAIR A STIPULATED WITH EXPIRATION TIMEFRAME OF 90 DAYS AFTER AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED AND REMAIN IN VIOLATION AFTER SET TIMEFRAME ORDER STA ORDER STATED CITY MAY PROCEED WITHIN ENFORCEMENT OF THE MILITIAN ORDER.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS IV 2 0 7 5, BLOCK ONE, LOT 16, LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT ONE.
THE OWNER ON RECORD IS AL GONZALEZ WITH A MAILING ADDRESS OF SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
ON NOTICE OF HEARING, WERE PROPERLY ISSUED AS REQUIRED, THE OWNER ON RECORD IS NOT PRESENT TODAY.
DOES THE BOARD WISH TO PROCEED? WE DO.
[00:40:06]
WE HAVE MADE CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND PERSON OF INTEREST BY MAIL, PHONE CALLS AND IN PERSON.OUR EXECUTIVE TEAM ALSO MET WITH MR. HERNANDEZ ALLOCATION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
I RECENTLY ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT MR. HERNANDEZ BY PHONE, TEXT, AND EMAIL TO MEET AT ALLOCATION TO DISCUSS ISSUES AND FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE AGREEMENT AND EXPIRATION OF AGREEMENT.
MR. HERNAND HERNANDEZ HAS FAILED TO PROVE OWNERSHIP OF CON OF CONTRACT OF PURCHASE FOR SIX 40 KENTUCKY.
THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HAS CONFIRMED ON DECEMBER 11TH, 2018 THE PROPERTY IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR HER HISTORIC DESIGNATION.
THE FIRST INSPECTION REGARDING SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE WAS CONDUCTED ON OCTOBER 17TH, 2017.
THE ORIGINAL NOTICE WAS MAILED ON OCTOBER 18TH, 2017, AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON JU ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR B SS B HEARING WAS POSTED AS SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR B S B HEARING WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER ON AUGUST 5TH, 2019.
ADMINISTRATIVE WARRANT WAS EXECUTED TO CONDUCT PHOTOS OF THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE.
I DO WANT TO MENTION THAT ON AUGUST 5TH, 2019, THE OWNER WAS REQUESTED TO BE A LOCATION, UM, TO ALLOW ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY AND HE FAILED TO SHOW NO SCOPE OF WORK OR FINANCIAL PROOF OR LETTER OR CREDIT OR AN ENGINEER'S REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO OUR OFFICE.
THE PERMITS ON FILE WERE PERMIT NUMBER 2 4 3 3 0 2 0 0, WHICH YOU RECEIVED A COPY THIS MORNING DATED NOVEMBER 20TH, 2018 FOR GENERAL REPAIRS.
INSPECTION FAILED ON 1 11 20 19 AND THE SECOND INSPECTION FAILED ON 1 18 20 19.
PERMIT NUMBER 2 4 3 3 3 3 8 DATED NOVEMBER 24TH, 2019 FOR ELECTRICAL AND REOPENED ON ON 2 28 OF 2019.
THE INSPECTION MADE ON 2 2 6 20 19 FAILED.
THE REINSPECTION REQUEST WAS MADE ON 2 28 OF 2019 FOR THE INTERIOR AND FOR THE ELECTRICAL REPAIRS.
ALL PREVIOUS PERMITS HAVE EXPIRED AS OF AUGUST 7TH, 2019.
NO NEW PUR NEW, NO NEW PERMITS HAVE BEEN FOUND ON SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE.
JUST TO RECAP THE INFORMATION, ALL PERMITS, UM, HAVE FAILED INSPECTIONS.
THE LAST TIME THE PROPERTY WAS SECURED BY CITY WAS ON AUGUST 5TH, 2019.
THE DATE OF OUR WARRANT, THE TOTAL COST OF ABAM WAS $96 WHERE THE CITY WILL PAY FOR FEES DUE TO THE WARRANT.
NOW, I WANTED JUST TO MENTION THAT ON THAT DATE, THE FRONT DOOR TO THE STRUCTURE WAS, UM, UNSECURED.
THE PHOTOS THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED FOR TODAY'S PRESENTATION WERE TAKEN IN AUGUST 5TH, 2019.
THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE IS ISSUES TO THE ROOF LINE AND FASCIA BOARDS.
SOME OF THE, UM, SIDING IS ACTUALLY BUCKLING OUT ON THIS SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.
A CLOSER LOOK AGAIN, FASCIA BOARD AND SOFFIT ARE DETERIORATED, HAVE LONG-TERM DETERIORATION AND A ROTTED LEFT SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.
SAME ISSUES ON THE, UH, FASCIA BOARD AND SOFFIT, AS WELL AS THE ROOF LINE.
NOW THIS PORTION HERE WAS REMOVED BY, UH, MR. HERNANDEZ.
THERE WAS A PORCH, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, THE CONCRETE TO THAT PORCH HAS CRACKED AS WELL AND HAS DAMAGE A CLOSER LOOK TO THAT ROOF LINE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S DETERIORATED PORTION OF IT IS DETACHING ON TOP.
THIS IS THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE.
NOW, THE OWNER ON THE, UM, ON THE AGREEMENT, UH, WAS SUPPOSED TO, WAS SUPPOSED TO PULL PERMITS AND ONE OF THE PERMITS WAS TO REMOVE PORTION OF THE REAR ADDITION, WHICH WAS ILLEGALLY PLACED.
HE WAS ALSO SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE AN ENGINEER'S LETTER TO THIS SECTION AND PULL A PARTIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT WHERE THIS, UH, ATTACHMENT, UH, WAS ALL THE WAY TO THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY.
HE DID DO THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION, BUT FAILED TO PULL PERMITS FOR THE SECTION AND FOR THE REPAIRS DONE.
THIS IS WHAT THE, UH, STRUCTURE USED TO LOOK LIKE IN 2018.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE WAS A, THE ADDITION WAS MADE ALL THE WAY TO THE BACK SECTION AND REPAIRS WERE MADE, BUT AGAIN, NO PERMITS HAD BEEN PULLED.
[00:45:01]
TO THE STRUCTURE, UM, IS ACTUALLY ILLEGAL WORK.THIS IS IN, UH, PREVIOUS EXISTING ACCESSORY.
IT WAS ACTUALLY A SMALL APARTMENT, AND WE'LL GO BACK TO SLIDE 10 SHORTLY.
AGAIN, ISSUES TO THE ROOF LINE IS, UH, HAS LONG-TERM DETERIORATION.
THIS IS THE SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE AS WELL.
AS YOU CAN SEE, IT HAS HOLES ON THE WALLS, ISSUES TO THE ROOF LINE.
THIS PORTION HERE IS DETERIORATED.
IT'S ROTTED AND IT, IT'S MISSING.
AS YOU CAN SEE, IT ACTUALLY COLLAPSED WITHIN.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THE BEAMS ARE OFF CENTER ON POST, WHICH IS AN ISSUE.
WE DID, AGAIN, REQUEST FOR AN ENGINEER LETTER, UH, TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS, UH, PORTION OR THE STRUCTURE, THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE WAS IN SAFE CONDITION AND HE FELT TO PROVIDE THAT.
NOW THE INTERIOR HAS SOME, SOME ITEMS LEFT BEHIND.
UM, HE DID ATTEMPT TO MOVE IN PRIOR TO THE AGREEMENT AND I'LL TOUCH BASE ON THE HISTORY OF THAT.
AND SHORTLY, THERE ARE SOME ISSUES TO THE, UH, PLUMBING, UH, THE WALLS.
THIS HERE IS ACTUALLY A REPAIR MADE, AND THAT IS ACTUALLY, ACTUALLY SHEET ROCK.
NOW THERE ARE ISSUES TO THE PLUMBING.
AGAIN, HE FAILED TO REPAIR THE, UH, THE PLUMBING AS WELL.
HE DID REPAIR SOME OF THE WALLS.
UH, HE DID SOME ELECTRICAL WORK FOR THE INTERIOR.
NOW THERE IS NO PERMITS FOR THE ELECTRICAL WORK THAT WAS BEING DONE.
THE NEW PANELING, AGAIN, NO PERMITS.
UH, THIS IS THE REAR, UH, OF THE STRUCTURE.
WHAT THE OWNER ACTUALLY DID IS SEPARATE THE STRUCTURE TO MAKE IT INTO A DUPLEX.
THE FRONT WAS TO BE THE FIRST APARTMENT IN THE BACK.
THE SECOND, UM, HE DID DO SOME WORK.
HE ALSO DID ELECTRICAL ON THAT SECTION.
THERE ARE STILL SOME WATER DAMAGE ON THE ROOF.
THE ROOF, AGAIN, WAS NOT REPAIRED.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S A NEW WIRING ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL.
HE DID, UH, PULL SOME, UM, PLUMBING AND WAS DOING PLUMBING REPAIR.
AGAIN, NO PERMITS FOR PLUMBING.
NOW THIS SECTION WAS OPENED TO THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND LIKE I SAID, HE DID, UH, SEPARATE THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURE TO THE REAR, UH, ADDITION.
AND THIS IS THE MAKESHIFT REPAIRS THAT HE MADE, UM, TO SEPARATE THAT TO THE DIVIDE INTO TWO SECTIONS OR TWO, UH, UNITS.
AGAIN, ELECTRICAL, NEW ELECTRICAL.
AND THIS IS THE PREVIOUS EXISTING ACCESSORY THAT HE DID REMOVED.
AND THIS IS ALL THAT'S LEFT OF THAT, UH, ACCESSORY.
THIS IS A SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND DILAPIDATED, DILAPIDATED CONDITION AND NEEDLE REPAIRS.
HOME HAS ISSUES TO THREE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF A STRUCTURE.
THE POST AND BEAM FOUNDATION IS A NEEDLE REPAIRS.
THE WALLS LACK WEATHER PROTECTION AND PORTION ARE MISSING.
THE ADDITION AT REAR MAINTENANCE STRUCTURE WAS REMOVED AND PARTIAL DEMOLITION MADE WITHOUT PERMITS.
THE INTERIOR FLOOR SYSTEM IS UNEVEN IN.
SECTIONS HAVE BEEN REPAIRED WITHOUT PERMITS.
STRUCTURE HAS PREVIOUSLY PRESENT PRESENTED DUE TO STRUCTURE, CONDITION, AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY WHERE VAGRANT VANDALIZED ALL COMPONENTS OF THE STRUCTURE.
ALL REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE WITHOUT, WITHOUT PERMITS.
THE SINGLE STORY DETACHED APARTMENT WAS DILAPIDATED WITHOUT, UM, EXCUSE ME, WAS DEMOLISHED WITHOUT A PERMITS LEAVING THE FLOOR SYSTEM COVERED AND INTACT.
I WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW REAL QUICK THE AGREEMENT THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE OR PREVIOUSLY MADE WITH US, WHERE THE, UH, PERSON AGREEING MR. MARCO HERNANDEZ, AGREEING TO REPAIR THE STRUCTURE.
[00:50:01]
TO, UH, PROVIDE UPDATE REPORTS 30 DAY IN TERMS OF TO THE CITY MANAGER, EXCUSE ME, TO CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER MR. DANNY LGAS.AND HE WAS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE THOSE EVERY 30 DAYS.
HE FAILED TO DO SO, DETERMINE THEIR AGREEMENT.
EXPIRED, UH, IT WAS A 90 DAY AGREEMENT, UH, FROM, UM, AUGUST 31ST, 2018, AND HE FAILED TO, UH, MEET THAT DEADLINE.
THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE ARTICLE, A CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56 SUBSECTIONS 1 2 8 11, 12 15 AND 16 FOR MAIN STRUCTURE AND 2, 2, 5, 8, AND 16 FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN WHICH ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, WHICH HAS AN ANY OR ALL THE CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS HEREAFTER DESCRIBED, SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DANGEROUS BUILDING.
AND IT HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, PROVIDED THE SUCH CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS OF DILAPIDATIONS TO STANDARDIZED OR FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
POST A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIFE, HEALTH PROPERTY, HUMAN SAFETY STAFF RECOMMENDS DEMOLITION.
AND FOR THE BOARD TO REAFFIRM PREVIOUS DEMOLITION ORDER DATED JANUARY 25TH, 2018.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION OF SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? I'VE GOT A FEW ON, UM, THE CONTRACT ON THE AGREEMENT NUMBER NINE WHERE IT SAYS SCOPE OF WORK, PROOF OF, UH, FINANCE AND ENGINEER'S REPORT.
IT SAID HE HAD 17 DAYS AS OF THE 31ST OF AUGUST.
WAS THAT GIVEN TO CODE MANAGEMENT? NO, IT WAS NOT.
NONE OF THIS WAS COMPLIED WITH.
WHY WAS IT NOT IMMEDIATELY DONE THEN FOR AN ORDER TO BE RESTORED FOR DEMOLITION? WE TRY TO GIVE MR. HERNANDEZ, WHICH WAS HAVING SOME, SOME ISSUES.
WE TRY TO, AND OF COURSE WE TRY TO GIVE HIM TIME TO, UM, TAKE POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY.
UH, THE 17 DAYS THAT HE FAILED TO PROVIDE THAT KIND OF WENT HAND IN HAND WITH ATTEMPTING FOR HIM TO PRO TO PROVIDE, UH, OR TO GET THE LEGAL ISSUES TAKEN CARE OF FROM HIS ATTORNEY.
UH, WE ALSO TRIED TO WORK WITH HIM ON PULLING THE PERMITS DURING THAT TIME.
UM, I SEE WHY YOU'RE ASKING THAT QUESTION.
WHY DID WE ALLOW THAT MUCH TIME? UM, AND IT WAS ALSO BECAUSE OF THE LEGAL ISSUES THAT THE PROPERTY HAD WITH THE TITLE.
SO WE TRIED TO WORK WITH HIM AS FAR AS ATTEMPTING TO LEGALLY OBTAIN, UM, THAT PROPERTY.
BUT ONCE THE CONTRACT BECOMES NULL VOID, WHY DID IT TAKE ALMOST A YEAR HE DIDN'T COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT OR EVEN OBTAIN THE PROPERTY AND STILL IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE? WHY WAS IT NOT IMMEDIATELY SOUGHT AT AWAITING ALMOST A YEAR TO CONTINUE THIS CASE FOR DEMO? WE WERE TRYING TO GIVE HIM EVERY BENEFIT AS POSSIBLE TO THE OWNER BECAUSE THIS WAS GONNA BE HIS HOMESTEAD BOTTOM LINE.
UM, HE WAS GONNA LIVE IN THERE WITH HIS FAMILY.
SO WE TRY TO WORK WITH HIM AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO GIVE HIM THAT OPPORTUNITY.
SO ON ITEM 23 OF THE SAME, THE AGREEMENT, HE DIDN'T PAY THE CITY, THE THOUSAND DOLLARS REQUIRED, UM, PERHAPS LEGAL CAN VERIFY THAT NUMBER 23 OF THE 23 OF AGREEMENT.
UM, DID MR. MARCUS HERNANDEZ PAY THE SUM OF A THOUSAND DOLLARS TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN CONSIDERATION FOR THE ALLOWANCE OF REPAIRS? NO, NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF.
I CAN TELL YOU THE REASON THAT WAS PROBABLY DELAYED IS BECAUSE ONCE AND ON CONTRACT IS SIGNED OFF, IT PRETTY MUCH GOES TO LEGAL.
UM, SO, UH, WHAT WE DO IS WE WAIT UNTIL THE AGREEMENT IS, UH, FAILED OR HAS, UH, BEEN IMPLEMENTED COMPLETELY.
UM, I COULD TELL YOU THIS IS PROBABLY IN LEGAL'S HANDS FOR A LITTLE BIT, WHICH IS WHY IT DELAYED, UH, CODE ENFORCEMENT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
UM, THAT'S PROBABLY THE BEST ANSWER I COULD GIVE YOU AS TO WHY THE STOP WORK ORDER STILL IN EFFECT, WE PLACED A STOP WORK ORDER ON ALL PERMITS, WAS, UM, LEGAL VERIFIED AND OUR OFFICE VERIFIED THAT WE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH ANOTHER DEMOLITION ORDER DUE TO THE, THIS OWNER'S INTENT TO REPAIR.
SO WE DID PLACE A STOP WORK ON NO PERMITS AS OF THAT DATE.
[00:55:01]
MR. ZUNIGA? YEAH, I THINK, UH, SOME OF THIS CONFUSION IS THAT, YOU KNOW, A LETTER WAS SIGNED, A DEMOTION ORDER WAS SIGNED FEBRUARY THE SEVENTH, 2018, AND THEN IT, IT WENT INTO REPAIRS.I, I, I, I THINK THIS IS WHERE THE CONFUSION IS.
AND WHEN IT WENT INTO REPAIRS, IT LINGERED ON, AM I CORRECT? AND THEN IT AGAIN, UH, NOW WE HAD TO PROCESS IT AGAIN.
UH, BUT THERE IS NO AGREEMENT ON ON THAT.
WE HAVE TO MAKE THAT DECISION NOW, JUST AS IF THE CASE WAS BOUGHT AGAIN, BRAND NEW TO US.
I KNOW MS. BROWN SIGNED IT, YOU KNOW, SO JUDY SIGNED IT.
SO THE THING IS THAT NOW THE CONFUSION IS WHAT WE'RE DOING TODAY.
AM I, UH, AM I CORRECT ON THAT? THAT THAT IS CORRECT, SIR.
ALL WE'RE DOING IS GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS AGAIN BECAUSE HE FAILED IT.
AND, AND JUST, UH, JUST A SMALL CLARIFICATION.
THE PREVIOUS DEMOLITION ORDER WAS DONE JANUARY 25TH, 2018, AND WE CAME INTO AGREEMENT IN AUGUST OF 2018.
WE ARE NOW JUST TRYING TO REAFFIRM THE PREVIOUS DEMOLITION ORDER BECAUSE OF THE NEW OWNER THAT WAS ATTEMPTING TO MAKE REPAIRS TO THE STRUCTURE.
I DON'T KNOW IF THIS WOULD BE BETTER ADDRESSED TO, UM, A ADMIT HE WAS IN HERE, A MAN WAS IN HERE.
HE WANTED TO, DIDN'T HE WANTED TO SPEAK ON THIS CASE? IS THIS THE CASE THAT HE WANTED TO SPEAK ON LEGAL? YES.
WELL, MAYBE I SHOULD ADDRESS THOSE QUESTIONS TO HIM.
AND, AND MAYBE IT'S, IT CAN BE ANSWERED OFFLINE OR WHATEVER.
IF THIS WAS A CASE THAT WAS BASED OFF A CONTRACT AND LEGAL DECIDED TO PUT THE DEMOLITION ON HOLD, NOT CANCEL IT, PUT IT ON HOLD UNTIL REPAIRS WERE MADE OR THE CONTRACT WAS VIOLATED, WHY DID NOT, OR WHY DID LEGAL NOT PICK IT UP AND PURSUE IT AS IT'S LEGAL INSTEAD OF BRINGING IT BACK HERE? I CAN TELL YOU, UH, IF YOU LOOK AT THE AGREEMENT, I, I DON'T KNOW IF LEGAL WAS INVOLVED IN THE AGREEMENT TO ALLOW IT TO BE REPAIRED.
I DO BELIEVE THAT, AND I AM, UH, CODE CAN HELP ME OUT ON THIS.
IT, ONCE THERE WAS AN ORDER TO DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY, I BELIEVE A NEW OWNER CAME INTO PICTURE.
WHAT CODE DECIDED TO DO WAS ALLOW THAT NEW OWNER AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THOSE REPAIRS DID NOT HAPPEN.
SO CODE THEN WANTED TO HAVE, UM, WANTED TO FOLLOW UP AND HAVE, UH, A B S B ORDER ENFORCED.
SO NOW THE PROPERTY'S BACK IN FRONT OF YOU.
UM, THAT'S, THAT'S THE BEST ANSWER I CAN GIVE.
I IN REGARDS TO, UH, THE FACT THAT THERE'S A NEW CONTRACT, UM, UH, LEGAL DID NOT DRAFT THE CONTRACT, HOWEVER, IT LOOKS LIKE AT SOME POINT IN TIME, LEGAL HAD TO REVIEW IT BECAUSE THERE WAS A NEW OWNER AND A NEW, UM, AND, AND SOME TYPE OF AGREEMENT WITH, UH, WITH CODE AND THE, AND THE NEW, UM, OWNER, THANK YOU.
IS, UH, IS A MAN GONNA GONNA SPEAK ON THIS? AMIN IS LEFT.
HUH? HE'S, HE HAD TO, UM, DEPART DUE TO A MEETING.
WELL, WELL THEN I GUESS THAT LEAVES US IN A BIND BECAUSE I HAVE SOME SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT ALL THESE TOP PEOPLE GETTING INVOLVED IN THIS.
BACK IN, UM, UH, 18 WHEN THERE WAS A, I GUESS A HOLE PUT ON THE DEMOLITION ORDER, AND THIS IS TOP BRASS HERE, AND THEN IT FELL BY THE WAYSIDE FOR ALMOST ANOTHER YEAR.
SO I'M LIKE, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S THE, WHAT'S THE DEAL HERE? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE WITH THIS PROPERTY? AND THEN THERE WERE INSPECTIONS MADE AFTER THE FACT THAT ALL THESE, UH, PEOPLE SIGNED OFF ON THIS.
AND, UH, HERE WE ARE, THE INSPECTIONS.
MORE INSPECTIONS, MORE INSPECTIONS.
AND HERE WE ARE IN, IN AUGUST OF 19, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS CASE AGAIN, SAME THING.
WHAT'S, WHAT'S UP WITH THAT? I, I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
WELL, I, I CANNOT SPEAK ON BEHALF OF MR. AMIN, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT OUR DEPARTMENT, UM, ALWAYS TRIES TO WORK WITH THE CITIZEN THAT
[01:00:01]
COMES FORTH AND SAYS, I'M GONNA USE THIS AS MY HOMESTEAD.SO IF THAT PROPERTY'S GONNA BE A HOMESTEAD, WE TRY TO GIVE THEM EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THOSE REPAIRS AND WORK WITH THEM TO, TO BE ABLE TO, TO BE ABLE TO ASSIST THEM SO THEY CAN HAVE A HOME.
UM, OUR TARGET IS NOT TO DEMOLISH ALL STRUCTURES.
OUR TARGET IS TO BE SURE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS SAFE.
SO WE DO TRY TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORS.
WE DO TRY TO WORK WITH THE CITIZENS, HOMEOWNERS, AND ESPECIALLY IN A CASE LIKE THIS, WHERE, UM, IT'S A FAMILY THAT IS GONNA BE USING THIS AS A POTENTIAL HOMESTEAD.
SO WE, WE DID GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.
OUR DEPARTMENT WORKED WITH THEM AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, HAND ON HAND.
UH, WE TRY TO MEET WITH THEM AND, AND GUIDE THEM TO MAKE THE REPAIRS SO THIS CAN BE THEIR HOME.
UM, THE REASON WHY WE ARE HERE NOW IN AUGUST IS BECAUSE HE FAILED TO MAKE THOSE REPAIRS.
SO THE STRUCTURE CANNOT BE DEEMED SAFE UNTIL ALL OF THAT IS DONE.
BUT WE GIVE THEM EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO, TO TRY TO MAKE IT SAFE FOR THEM AND, AND THEIR FAMILY.
NOW, I KNOW IT TOOK A WHILE FOR THE PROPERTY TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE WE ARE SO BOOKED AS YOU KNOW, SO THAT'S WHY IT TOOK SO LONG ALSO TO BRING IT FORTH IN FRONT OF YOU.
UM, BUT, BUT WE ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOW TAKEN CARE OF.
YOU KNOW, I, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING PERFECTLY.
I, AND I, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH TRYING TO HELP THE OWNER, YOU KNOW, GET BACK ON ITS FEET OR DO WHATEVER HE NEEDS TO DO AND THE TIME ALLOTTED, BUT HOW MUCH TIME IS, IS HOW MUCH TIME THESE INSPECTIONS WENT ON FROM FOR ALMOST A WHOLE YEAR AND NOTHING WAS DONE.
AND THAT, THAT IRRITATES ME BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
YOU KNOW, IT JUST DOESN'T COMPUTE IN MY, IN MY COMPUTER.
IT JUST GOES ON AND ON AND ON.
AND WE ARE HERE ALMOST EVERY WEEK OR EVERY OTHER WEEK, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO DO THE BEST WE CAN TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES FOR SAN ANTONIO'S PROPERTY.
AND IT, IT JUST, YOU KNOW, AFTER ALL THESE PEOPLE SIGNED OFF ON IT, I MEAN, MIKE, SHANNON'S NAME IS ON HERE, AND THEN IT JUST, IT, IT'S STILL, THE INSPECTIONS GO ON AND ON AND OFF ANOTHER YEAR, REALLY.
RIGHT? WE HAVE TO MAKE INSPECTIONS, UM, ON A PROPERTY LIKE THIS, UM, TO TRY TO WORK WITH THE OWNER AND TO, TO BE SURE THAT EVERYTHING'S DONE ACCORDING TO THE, UH, TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
AND WE HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE ACTUAL AGREEMENT TO EXPIRE TO BE ABLE TO MAKE A DECISION AND MOVE FORWARD.
AND THAT DOES TAKE A LITTLE TIME.
IF THIS CONTRACT WAS FOR 90 DAYS, MY, DID I HEAR THAT RIGHT? YES, SIR.
WITHIN THE 90 DAYS, WHEN WAS IT VIOLATED? WELL, I'M JUST SAYING BECAUSE IF IT WAS VIOLATED WITHIN THE 90 DAYS, WHY DID THE STAFF, BECAUSE IT WAS ONLY A STOP THE DEMO FOR 90 DAYS, WHY WAS IT NOT PICKED UP AT A STAFF LEVEL AND GONE THROUGH AND NOT, AND, AND PRESENTED BACK TO US? IF YOU PUT A STOP ON THAT, A FREEZE HOPING THIS WAS GOING TO BE FOLLOWED AND IT WAS BREACHED WITHIN THE 90 DAYS OR THEREABOUT, WHY WAS IT NOT PICKED UP FROM STAFF TO PUSH THE CASE FORWARD? I BELIEVE THAT'S A QUESTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL.
WE BELIEVE THERE'S A LOT OF QUESTIONS HERE FOR MANAGEMENT, BUT MANAGEMENT ISN'T HERE.
SO I'M JUST SAYING IT, IT POINT OF ORDER, IT BASICALLY IS, IS ALL A MOOT ISSUE.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A STRUCTURE THAT IS NO LONGER SAFE.
AND AS A RESULT OF THAT, SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE AND AS A RESULT OF SOMETHING NEEDED TO BE DONE, I MOVE THAT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT SIX 40 KENTUCKY AVENUE IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56, SUBSECTIONS 1, 2, 8, 11, 12, 15, AND 18.
AND THAT THE BUILDING BE DEMOLISHED IN 30 DAYS THAT IT BE SECURED AND IT MUST BE VACATED AND STAY VACANT UNTIL DEMOLISHED SECOND.
WE HAVE A 30 DAY, UM, MOTION FOR DEMOLITION, UH, BY MR. NELSON AND A SECOND BY MR. ZUNIGA.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY.
[1. 19-5894 (CD-5) 1326 Elvira St]
AND OUR NEXT CASE IS, UH, 1326 ELVIRA MORNING.I'M A CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND THE PROPERTY BROUGHT BEFORE THE BILLING STANDARDS BOARD.
TODAY IS 1326 ELVIRA STREET, LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL
[01:05:01]
DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE.LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS N C B 6 1 1 0 BLOCK EIGHT LOT SOUTH 72.1 FEET OF THREE WITH A JOSE RODRIGUEZ JR.
LISTED AS BEAR IN THE BEXAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT RECORDS AS THE OWNER, THE VIOLATIONS FOR SECTION 6 0 4 0.1 FACILITIES REQUIRED, WHICH STATES EVERY OCCUPIED BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION AND SECTION 6 0 5.
ON MAY 10TH, 2019, THE CODE OFFICER WAS RESPONDING TO A COMPLAINT, OBSERVED THE STRUCTURE TO BE OCCUPIED, AND THAT IT DID NOT HAVE ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
THE OFFICER TOOK PHOTOS OF THE VIOLATION, POSTED A SAN ANTONIO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF THE FRONT OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE.
A COPY OF THAT NOTICE WAS SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO THE OWNER LISTED IN THE BEXAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT RECORDS.
THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION GAVE THE OWNER UNTIL MAY 27TH, 2019, TO CORRECT THIS VIOLATION.
ON JUNE 6TH, 2019, THE OFFICER CONDUCTED A FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION AND FOUND THE STRUCTURE REMAINED OCCUPIED.
HE NOTED THAT AS, UH, FRONT WINDOWS WERE OPEN, THE OFFICER ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT THE OCCUPANT OR THE OWNER AND FOUND NO ANSWER.
WHEN THEY KNOCKED AT THE FRONT DOOR, THEY DID LEAVE A DOOR HANGER REQUESTING THE OCCUPANT OR OWNER CONTACT THAT OFFICER.
THEY ALSO NOTED AT THAT TIME THAT DISTILL WAS WITHOUT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
ON JUNE 19TH, 2019, THE OFFICER CONDUCTED ANOTHER FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION, FOUND THE STRUCTURE, DID REMAIN OCCUPIED, AND IN VIOLATION, THE OFFICER UPDATED THE PHOTOS OF THE VIOLATION AND MADE CONTACT WITH MR. UH, JOSE RODRIGUEZ, JR.
MR. RODRIGUEZ INFORMED THE OFFICER HE WAS IN CONTACT WITH CITY PUBLIC SERVICE AND WAS ATTEMPTING TO HAVE THE ELECTRICAL SY, UH, SERVICES RESTORED TO THAT PROPERTY.
THE OFFICER PROVIDED MR. RODRIGUEZ AT THAT TIME WITH A REFERRAL PAMPHLET SO HE CAN GET, MAYBE, GET SOME ASSISTANCE.
UM, THE OFFICER SUBMITTED THIS AT THAT TIME.
THE OFFICER SUBMITTED THE CASE FOR SCHEDULING WITH THIS BOARD ON JULY 17TH, 2019.
THE OFFICER CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION AND FOUND THE PROPERTY REMAIN UNCHANGED AND WITHOUT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
THE OFFICER ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT THE OWNER, BUT THERE WAS NO ANSWER.
AGAIN, HE LEFT A DOOR HANGER REQUESTING THE OWNER CONTACT THEM AND UPDATED THE PHOTOS.
ON JULY 24TH, 2019, A RE-INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED.
PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION, THE PHOTOS WERE UPDATED.
AND AT THAT TIME WE POSTED THE B S B UH, NOTICE OF HEARING.
LAST INSPECTION WAS ON AUGUST 6TH, 2019.
UH, WE FOUND NO, NO, UH, PROGRESS HAVE BEEN MADE.
IT STILL REMAINS WITHOUT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
I'LL SHOW YOU THE PHOTOS REAL QUICK.
THIS WAS THE NOTICE POSTED YARD.
THIS WAS THE INITIAL, THIS ONE HE POSTED THE, UH, PAMPHLET AND A DOOR HANGER.
THE SEVEN 17, NO ELECTRICAL SERVICE DOWN HERE.
THERE'S NO ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
UH, THE ONLY CODE VIOLATIONS THAT HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THIS LOCATION ALL OCCURRED ON MAY 10TH.
THERE'S NO OTHER, UH, REPORTS OF VIOLATION IN OUR SYSTEM.
AND THOSE CASES WERE FOR AN INOPERABLE VEHICLE, WHICH THE OWNER DID COMPLY BY HAVING THAT VEHICLE REMOVED.
NO WATER SERVICE, WHICH THE OWNER DID COMPLY ON, UH, JUNE 19TH OF HAVING THAT RESTORED.
UH, AND EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE FOR FURNITURE ON THE YARD, WHICH THE OWNER COMPLIED.
UH, STAFF IS REQUESTING THE OWNER HAVE THE ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL SYSTEM RESTORED TO THE PROPERTY AND ORDER TO VACATE BE ISSUED UNTIL THAT VIOLATION IS CORRECTED.
THAT CONCLUDES MY VIOL, MY, MY VIOLATION.
I'M SORRY, MY, UH, PRESENTATION.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? NO QUESTIONS QUESTION.
THIS, UH, REALLY DOESN'T HAVE, WELL, IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE CHARGE HERE, BUT I MEAN, IT WASN'T, UH, YOU SAID THERE'S NO OTHER VIOLATIONS THAT WERE, UH, WRITTEN UP THERE, BUT HOW ABOUT THE EXTERIOR, THE WEATHER? I'M SORRY, SIR.
THERE WERE VIOLATIONS WRITTEN UP.
UM, WE WROTE 'EM UP FOR EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE.
WHICH YOU'VE SEEN IN THE FIRST PHOTO, AND THEY HAVE COMPLIED, UM, WITH THAT BY, BY THE DATE.
BUT, BUT TODAY WE'RE ONLY ADDRESSING THE ELECTRIC.
YEAH, I LOOKED AT HIM, I SAID, OKAY.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE BOARD? OKAY,
[01:10:01]
THANK YOU.WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS CASE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I DECLARE THAT THE MAIN STRUCTURE AT 1 3 2 6, ELVIRA THREE TO BE IN SUB, UH, SUBSTANDARD AND IN VIOLATION OF CITY PROPERTY CODE 6 0 4 0.1, AND THAT THE ELECTRICITY BE RESTORED AND THAT THE PROPERTY BE VACATED IMMEDIATELY AND SECURED UNTIL THE ELECTRICITY IS RESTORED.
THE MOTION IS FOR MR. ANDERS FOR THE ELECTRICITY TO BE RESTORED AND SECURED AND VACATED, I BELIEVE, AND IT WAS SECONDED BY MR. ZUNIGA.
DO, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION.
ALL OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.
[2. 19-5895 (CD-1) 112 Rehmann St]
CASE IS, UH, 1 1 2.FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS ELISA VALDES RE, PREMISE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE STRUCTURE PRESENTED TODAY IS LOCATED AT 1 1 2 RMAN STREET WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX.
THIS CASE IS THE FIRST TIME BEING HEARD BEFORE THE BOARD.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS N CCB 3 5 5 8 BLOCK ONE LOT SIX, LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT ONE.
THE OWNER OF RECORD IS
THE OWNER AND RECORD IS NOT PRESENT TODAY.
DOES THE BOARD WISH TO PROCEED? WE DO.
WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE OWNER IN, IN PERSON AT WELL, TWO RICKMAN WHERE SHE RESIDES.
WE HAVE ALSO SPOKEN WITH A DAUGHTER AND SOME FAMILY MEMBERS ON THE PROPERTY.
THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HAS CONFIRMED ON APRIL 5TH, 2019, AND ON JULY 29TH, 2019 THE PROPERTY IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION.
THE FIRST INSPECTION REGARDING ONE 12 RMAN STREET WAS CONDUCTED ON JUNE 6TH, 2018.
THE, THE ORIGINAL NOTICE WAS MAILED JUNE 6TH, 2018, AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON CLAIM ON JUNE 11TH, 2018.
ON JULY 23RD, 2019, A NOTICE TO VACATE WAS POSTED AT 1 1 2 RMAN STREET ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR B S B HEARING WAS POSTED AT 1 1 2 RICHMOND STREET ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR B S B HEARING WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON AUGUST 5TH, 2019.
NO SCOPE OF WORK OR FINANCIAL PROOF OR LETTER OF CREDIT OR ENGINEER'S REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO OUR OFFICE AS OF AUGUST 8TH, 2019.
THERE ARE NO PERMITS ON FILE FOR 1 1 1 2 RICHMOND STREET.
AND BEFORE WE START THE CASE, I WANNA, UH, BE SURE TO MENTION THAT THE OWNER AND THE DAUGHTER WERE, UM, WERE, UM, GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO RELOCATE.
WE HAD DID TRY TO WORK WITH THEM.
THE OWNER, UH, REFUSES TO LEAVE THE PROPERTY DUE TO THE CONDITIONS.
UM, THE LIVING CONDITIONS, WE, UM, WE, WE BELIEVE THE PROPERTY IS NOT LIVABLE AT THIS TIME.
THIS IS THE STRUCTURE THAT WE ARE CONCERNED OF AND THAT WE HAVE IN QUESTION.
THE, THIS IS ACTUALLY A TRAVEL TRAILER THAT THEY PERMANENTLY PLACED ON THE PROPERTY AND USED AS LIVING QUARTERS.
UH, THEY PLACED A RAMP FOR THE ELDERLY TO BE ABLE TO COME IN AND OUT OF THAT STRUCTURE.
I VIEW, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE STRUCTURE ITSELF IS IN DILAPIDATED CONDITION.
UH, THEY TRY TO COVER THE BOTTOM TO ALLOW TO NOT ALLOW AIR OR HEAT OR, UM, OTHER ENVIRONMENT FACTORS TO GO INTO THE STRUCTURE THROUGH THE BOTTOM.
THIS IS ACTUALLY THEIR ELECTRICAL SYSTEM.
UM, AGAIN, WE TRY TO RELOCATE THE EL THE FEMALE.
WE, UM, GIVE A REFERRAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOUSING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, UH, TO OFFER SERVICES FOR THEM TO RELOCATE.
UM, THE DAY THAT I WAS THERE, I ACTUALLY VISITED WITH THE ELDERLY FEMALE.
UM, SHE HAS DIFFICULTY WALKING.
UM, IT WAS VERY, VERY WARM AND THAT I WAS CONCERNED FOR HER.
I ASKED HER IF SHE NEEDED MEDICAL ATTENTION.
I ASKED HER IF SHE WANTED, UH, FOR US TO FACILITATE A PLACE TO STAY FOR HER, BUT SHE REFUSED.
UH, SHE ALLOWED ME TO GO INTO THE PROPERTY AND TAKE PHOTOS AND VISIT WITH HER.
[01:15:01]
A FEW MINUTES LATER, SHE REQUESTED FOR ME TO LEAVE.I DID LEAVE THE PROPERTY, BUT THIS IS THE CONDITION THAT, UM, SHE'S ACTUALLY LIVING IN AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IS IN VERY POOR CONDITION.
ELECTRICAL ISSUES, AGAIN, THROUGHOUT THE STRUCTURE, THEIR MAKESHIFT ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY.
UM, THE BOTTOM WAS JUST THE KIND OF BEING REPLACED WITH PIECES OF PLYWOOD SO THAT SHE CAN BE ABLE TO WALK THROUGH IT AGAIN.
SHE HAS A DIFFICULTY WALKING AND SHE USED A WALKER TO GET TO AND FROM, AGAIN, JUST THE PATCHES PATCHING UP THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE ITSELF.
THIS IS THE RESTROOM THAT SHE USES.
UH, SHE CONNECTED THIS TO THE SWORE LINE.
I DUNNO HOW THEY DID THAT, BUT IT WAS DONE.
AND THIS IS, THIS ISN'T THE CONDITION THAT SHE LIVES IN.
AND AS SHE WAS GOING OUT OF TOWN, UM, AND WAS UNABLE TO BE HERE, UM, THIS IS NO CONDITION FOR ANYONE TO LIVE, ESPECIALLY SOMEONE IN HER AGE.
THIS IS ALL ALUMINUM, AND IT WAS ABOUT A HUNDRED CLOSE TO A HUNDRED DEGREES.
SO THE INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WAS LIKE AN OVEN.
AND THAT'S WHAT WE, UH, TRIED TO, UH, RELOCATE HER RIGHT THERE AND THEN, AND SHE, SHE REFUSED.
UM, ALSO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, UM, IS ACTUALLY JUST A PRE-FABRICATED, UH, THAT SITS ON GRADE.
THERE ARE ISSUES, AS YOU CAN SEE TO THE ROOF.
AND WHAT THIS IS BEING USED FOR IS JUST STORAGE OF THEIR CLOTHING.
THEY OPEN UP THE BACK SECTION TO COME IN AND OUT TO THE STRUCTURE AND IS IS USED AS A CLOSET.
CLOSET, AND I'LL SHOW YOU THAT IN A MINUTE.
JUST ITEMS THROUGHOUT THE, THE PROPERTY.
SO AGAIN, JUST USE THE STORAGE AND AS A CLOSET, OR THEY HANG THEIR CLOTHES.
A TRAVEL TRAILER HAS BEEN PLACED ON GRADE TO BE USED AS LIVING QUARTERS.
THE OWNER HAS CON CON CONNECTED ELECTRICITY AND PLUMBING TO BE USED ON A DAILY BASIS.
THE TRAILER IS DETERIORATED AND IT'S NOT IN LIVABLE CONDITION.
THE FLOOR SYSTEM IS WEAK AND SECTIONS HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH WOOD TO COVER THE HOLES.
THE RESTROOM HAS PLUMBING ISSUES AND ELECTRICAL ISSUES DUE TO MAKESHIFT CONNECTIONS AND DETERIORATION.
THE PRE-FABRICATED ACCESSORY METAL SHED SITS AND GRADE AND HAS LONG-TERM DETERIORATION.
A PORTION OF THE REAR METAL PANEL HAS BEEN REMOVED TO BE USED AS A DOOR.
THE STRUCTURES BEING USED AS CLOSET STORAGE ONLY.
THE CASE WAS REFERRED TO NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOUSING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR ASSISTANCE THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER AND FOR RELOCATING ASSISTANCE AS WELL.
THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 1 1 2 RICHMOND STREET IS A VIOLATION OF CITY COURT ARTICLE, A CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56 SUBSECTIONS 1 12 5 8 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18 FOR MAIN STRUCTURE AND 1 2, 8, 12, 15, AND 18 FOR THE ACCESSORY IN WHICH ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, WHICH HAS ANY EARLY CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS HEREAFTER DESCRIBED SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, PROVIDED THE SUCH CONDITIONS OR DEFECTS OF DILAPIDATION.
SO STANDARDIZED OR FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION POSE A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIFE, HEALTH, PROPERTY, OR HUMAN SAFETY STAFF RECOMMENDS DEMOLITION FOR BOTH THE ACCESSORY AND THE MAIN STRUCTURE.
THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION FOR 1 1 2 RICKMAN STREET.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? YES, FOR RECORD.
MR. ANDERS, UM, YOU STATED ON THE DISTRICT WAS DISTRICT FIVE? UH, NO, SIR.
I I THOUGHT I HEARD DISTRICT FIVE IN THERE AND I WAS GONNA CLARIFY THAT IT IS DISTRICT ONE ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTS.
WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICER? YEAH, MR. ZUNIGA? YEAH.
HOW DID THIS CAME ABOUT? WHAT WAS IT? PROACTIVE? UM, NO SIR.
ACTUALLY THERE WAS A COMPLAINT THAT CAME IN FOR TRASH AND DEBRIS TECHNICALLY WAS PROACTIVE.
WHEN THERE WAS A COMPLAINT THAT CAME FOR TRASH AND DEBRIS, UH, THEY CALLED ME OUT TO THE PROPERTY AND I DECIDED TO ADDRESS IT.
UH, WHAT I'M GONNA SAY HERE IS, YOU KNOW, THAT WE'RE RIGHT HERE AND THAT HOUSE IS RIGHT THERE.
I'VE PASSED FOR THE LAST 40 YEARS, I GUESS, AND I NEVER SEEN
[01:20:01]
IT THAT WAY, BUT, UH, IT'S GOOD THAT SOMEBODY COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, FOR THE WELFARE.IF YOU GO TO SLIDE 21, WHAT IS THIS? UM, THAT'S A TRAVEL TRAILER THAT THEY HAVE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
UH, THE OWNER FOR SOME REASON STAYS ON THE OTHER, UH, PROB ON THE OTHER STRUCTURE.
UH, SHE WAS, SHE WANTED TO BE HERE, BUT SHE'S IN MONTEREY GETTING SOME, UM, MEDICATION OF SOME SORT.
UM, HER DAUGHTER SAID THAT SHE WAS GONNA BE HERE.
SHE FAILED TO SHOW UP, AND THAT'S ACTUALLY HER DAUGHTER, BUT THAT IS ANOTHER TRAVEL TRAILER THAT IS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF.
SO THAT'S NEITHER THE MAIN NOR THE ACCESSORY? NO.
THIS IS BOTH THE MAIN AND THE FRONT AND THE ACCESSORY IN THE BACK THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY.
THE IN SLIDE, UM, I THINK IT IS SLIDE TWO, SORRY, THREE.
SO THIS, THIS WHITE HOUSE IN THE BACK IS NOT RELATED TO THAT PROPERTY? NO, MA'AM.
UH, THIS FENCE IS THE DIVIDED LINE FOR BOTH PROPERTIES.
THAT'S A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STRUCTURE.
I'M SORRY, WHAT DEAR? WHAT DID YOU SAY? FENCE THE FENCE.
THE FENCE IS THE DIVIDED LINE, THE DIVIDING LINE.
AND THAT'S A DIFFERENT PROPERTY.
OKAY, SO YOU WANT US TO CONSIDER THIS AND THE OTHER TRAILER? CORRECT.
BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN PLACED PERMANENTLY ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF IS CONSIDERED A STRUCTURE.
IN ORDER FOR US TO REMOVE IT AND DEMOLISH IT, WE HAVE TO GET A DEMOLISHING ORDER.
OKAY, ALRIGHTYY, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS HERE? HOLD ON A MINUTE.
ACCORDING TO THE DIAGRAM, IT'S IN, UH, I FORGET THE SLIDE.
WELL, IT'S ACTUALLY IN THE P D F THERE'S A DIAGRAM THAT SHOWS ACCESSORY ONE IN MAINE, AND THEN IT SHOWS TRAVEL TRAILER AND ACCESSORY TWO.
WHAT WE ARE CONSIDERING IS THESE TWO HERE, CORRECT? THOSE TWO RIGHT UP THERE.
SO THE OTHER TRAILER'S NOT BEING CONSIDERED CORRECT? THE TRAILER IS NOT THE TRAILER TRAILER IS NOT SET PERMANENTLY.
AND IT'S, IT IS NOT BEING LIVED IN.
SO THE TWO THAT ARE SHOWING ARE THE ONES WE'RE CONSIDERING, CORRECT? I'M SORRY, I THOUGHT YOU SAID ALL THREE WERE BEING CONSIDERED.
THIS IS CONSIDERED BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN PLACED PERMANENTLY SET ON THE STR ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF.
UM, IT'S CONSIDERED A, A, UH, IT IS CONSIDERED A STRUCTURE.
SO WE'RE CONSIDERING THIS AS MAIN STRUCTURE, ONE FOR DEMOLITION, AND THEN THE ACCESSORY IN THE BACK, THE METAL PRE-FABRICATED SHED IS, UM, ACCESSORY BEING CONSIDERED FOR DEMOLITION.
UH, WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS CASE.
SO CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE? I MOVE THAT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT ONE 50, EXCUSE ME, ONE 12 RAYMOND, UH, IS IN, IS IT PUBLIC NUISANCE AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56 SUBSECTIONS FOR THE MAIN STRUCTURE, 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18.
AND FOR THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, 1, 2, 8, 12, 15, AND 18, AND THAT THE STRUCTURES ARE NOT FEASIBLE TO BEING REPAIRED, I DO PRESENT A HEALTH AND SAFETY HAZARD AND THAT THE PROPERTY BE DEMOLISHED IN 30 DAYS THAT THE PROPERTY BE VACATED AND REMAIN VACANT UNTIL DEMOLISHED.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I HAVE A FRIENDLY AND SECURE THE PROPERTY.
ADD, UH, TO THE MOTION, SECURE THE PROPERTY.
SO MR. HARPER, YOU HAD A SECOND.
AND ALSO MR. ANDERS HAD A SECOND FLOOR, UM, TO SECURE THE PROPERTY, IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT.
THAT WAS A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT.
SO IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY, WE HAVE A 30 DAY, UH, DEMO ORDER.
WE HAVE A 30 DAY DEMO BY MR. NELSON.
WE HAVE A SECOND BY, UH, MR. HARPER, AND WE HAVE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT BY MR.
[01:25:01]
AND MR. ANDERS.NOT EVERYBODY, MR. NELSON ALSO ORDERED A VACATE FOR THAT.
OKAY, SO NOW I HAVE EVERYTHING.
30 DAY MEMO, A 30 DAY DEMO WITH A VACATE BY MR. NELSON.
MR. ANDERS AT A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT DURING THE PROPERTY.
ALL OPPOSED? OKAY, THE AYES HAVE IT.
[6. 19-5899 (CD-6) 440 Pinn Rd]
PENN ROAD, FOUR 40 PENN ROAD.GOOD MORNING BOARD FOR THE RECORD.
MY NAME IS ISRAEL VIA DANGEROUS SREMM OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE STRUCTURE BEING PRESENTED TODAY IS LOCATED AT FOUR 40 PENN ROAD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX.
THIS CASE IS THE FIRST TIME BEING HEARD BEFORE THE SPORT.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS N C B 1 5 3 3 1 BLOCK, FIVE EIGHT LOT P DASH SEVEN C 12.5000 AC LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX.
THE OWNER ON RECORD IS ALMOST EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED WITH A MAILING ADDRESS OF PO BOX 7 2 0, MARION, TEXAS 7 8 1 2 4.
ALL NOTICE OF THE HEARING WERE PROPERLY ISSUED AS REQUIRED.
THE OWNER AND RECORD IS NOT PRESENT TODAY.
DOES THE BOARD WISH TO PROCEED? WE DO.
PHONE NUMBER FOUND FOR, UH, CINDY COBER, 2 1 0 6 0 6 4 2 4 3.
AT ONE POINT, THE PROPERTY OWNER WANTED TO SELL THE PROPERTY AND I WAS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING SO BEFORE IT CAUGHT FIRE.
UM, AND THEY HAVE HIRED A DEMOLITION COMPANY TO GO IN THERE AND DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE, BUT THEY HAVE NOT OBTAINED PERMITS AND THE PERMIT THAT THEY TRY TO OBTAIN, THEY HAVE NOT PAID FOR.
SO THERE'S NOT ONE THAT HAS BEEN ISSUED.
THE DEMOLITION PERMIT THAT IS PENDING IS PERMIT NUMBER 2 4 9 7 2 3 4.
THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HAS CONFIRMED ON APRIL 16TH, 2019 THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION.
THE FIRST INSPECTION REGARDING FOUR 40 PENN ROAD WAS CONDUCTED ON JANUARY 23RD, 2019, AND THE ORIGINAL NOTICE WAS MAILED OUT JANUARY 25TH, 2019.
THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED, CLAIMED ON FEBRUARY 1ST, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR THE BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD HEARING WAS POSTED AT FOUR 40 PENN ROAD ON JULY 24TH, 2019.
THE NOTICE FOR THE BILLING STANDARDS WERE HEARING WAS MAILED OUT TO THE OWNER, AND THE CERTIFIED RECEIPT WAS RETURNED ON JULY 29TH, 2019.
ON MAY 15TH, 2019, AN ADMINISTRATIVE WARRANT WAS EXECUTED TO CONDUCT PHOTOS OF THE INTERIOR AND THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE.
AT THIS TIME, NO SCOPE OF WORK OR FINANCIAL PROOF LETTER OR CREDIT OR ENGINEERS HAS OR REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
AND AGAIN, AS OF JULY, UH, I'M SORRY, AS OF AUGUST 8TH, 2019, THERE'S ONLY ONE DEMOLITION PERMIT ON FILE THAT HAS NOT BEEN PAID FOR.
AND THAT, AGAIN, THAT PERMANENT NUMBER IS 2 4 9 7 2 3 4.
APPARENTLY I HAVE AN EXTRA CASE PENDING FOR THE SECURING OF THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY OWNER AT ONE POINT HAD A, UH, WR IRON FENCE IN THE FRONT, WHICH HAS BEEN STOLEN.
UM, IT WAS CUT AND REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY.
THEN, UH, AGAIN, THEY PLACED A TEMPORARY FENCE AND THAT WAS ALSO STOLEN FROM THE PROPERTY.
UM, CURRENTLY THEY DO HAVE A, A PLASTIC MESH UP IN THE FRONT TO TRY TO SECURE THE STRUCTURES AND PEOPLE FROM GOING IN AND OUT, BUT PEOPLE KEEP GOING IN THERE AND DOING ILLEGAL DUMPING.
THIS IS A PLOT PLAN OF THE PROPERTY.
IN THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, THERE'S A GUARD CHECK, UH, THAT ONE'S STRUCTURALLY SOUND.
UH, PAST THAT THERE'S THE FIELD PUMPS.
AND THEN THE TWO STRUCTURES THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY IS BUILDING NUMBER ONE AND BUILDING NUMBER TWO.
IN THE BACK PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, THIS IS THE GUARD CHECK.
THIS IS WHERE THE WR IRON FENCE USED TO BE IN THE FRONT, WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED, HAS BEEN CUT.
AND THEN THIS IS THE, THE PLASTIC MESH THEY HAVE IN THE FRONT TO TRY TO KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF IT.
AS YOU CAN SEE HERE AT THE FRONT, YOU CAN SEE THE ILLEGAL DUMPING.
THIS IS GOING TOWARDS THE BAGS.
THIS IS THE FIELD PUMPS, AND THEN BEHIND THE FIELD PUMPS IS BUILDING NUMBER ONE.
AND THEN BEHIND BUILDING NUMBER ONE IS BUILDING NUMBER TWO.
THIS IS THE FRONT, I'M SORRY, THIS IS THE SIDE ELEVATION
[01:30:01]
OF BUILDING NUMBER ONE.YOU CAN SEE THE FIRE, UH, TOWARDS THE LEFT HAND SIDE, HOW IT CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE ROOF.
IT'S KIND OF DIPPING HERE ON THE SIDE.
AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE.
UH, THE BAY DOORS HAVE BEEN CUT OR DAMAGED.
YOU CAN SEE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEAR.
YOU CAN SEE THE BAY DOORS HAVE COLLAPSED.
YOU CAN SEE THE ROOF IS BLOWING HERE AT THE TOP.
AND THEN RIGHT HERE AT THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THIS PICTURE, THIS IS THE SIDE ELEVATION ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE.
THIS IS THE RIGHT ELEVATION OF THE, UH, BUILDING.
YOU CAN SEE AGAIN SOME OF THE SMOKE DAMAGE HERE AT THE TOP.
AND THEN THE LINGUAL DUMPING ON THE SIDE.
THIS IS THE REAR ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE.
UH, YOU CAN SEE THE BAY DOORS HAVE EITHER BEEN DAMAGED OR REMOVED OR CUT.
AND THEN HERE TOWARDS THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE SOME OF THAT, UM, I GUESS THE MOST OF THE FIRE WAS CONCENTRATED.
THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE PROPERTY.
THE WHOLE ENTIRE FRONT ELEVATION HAS COLLAPSED.
THIS IS AGAIN, A PICTURE, A CLOSEUP PICTURE OF THE FRONT ELEVATION TOWARDS THE RIGHT HAND SIDE.
YOU CAN SEE WHERE EVERYTHING HAS COLLAPSED.
YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, BOEING.
THIS IS GOING UP THE STAIRS TO THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE OFFICE, PORTION OF THE BUILDING.
YOU CAN SEE HERE AT THE TOP, SOME MORE SAGGING UP AT THE RAFTERS.
AND THEN YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING HAS BEEN CONSUMED BY THE FIRE.
AS FAR AS THE, UH, OFFICES, THE SPACE THAT WAS HERE IN THIS, IN THE SECOND FLOOR, THE CLOSEUP, AND AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE HOW THE METAL HAS TWISTED AND THE SUPPORT COLUMNS HAVE WORKED.
THIS IS STILL THE SECOND FLOOR HEADED.
LOOKING MORE TOWARDS THE RIGHT, YOU CAN SEE AGAIN, MOST OF THE OFFICE SPACE HAS BEEN CONSUMED BY THE FIRE.
AND THEN THIS IS, UH, LOOKING FROM INSIDE THE BAY TOWARDS THE SECOND FLOOR.
EVERYTHING'S GONE HEADED OUTWARD.
UH, YOU CAN SEE DAYLIGHT PIECES OF THE SIDE WALLS MISSING.
AND AGAIN, THE WHOLE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE HAS BEEN, HAS COLLAPSED.
THIS IS HEADED TOWARDS INSIDE THE BAY AREA, STILL BUILDING NUMBER ONE.
THE WHOLE WALL SIDE WALL HAS BEEN RIPPED OUT.
THE LIGHT NUMBER 15, THIS IS THE WHERE THE PICTURE WAS TAKEN UP TO THE TOP.
AND THEN AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE MORE SAGGING HERE AT THE RAFTERS.
YOU CAN SEE THE SEPARATION HERE AT THE TOP, MORE SAGGING.
THIS IS LOOKING TOWARDS THE BACK OF THE BAY.
THE BACK OF THE BAY MOSTLY SUSTAINED JUST SMOKE DAMAGE.
THIS IS THE BUILDING NUMBER TWO.
AS YOU CAN SEE, ALL THE BAY DOORS HAVE BEEN OPENED UP.
UH, THERE'S BAYS GOING IN THERE TRASHING THE PLACE.
UH, THEY HAVE STOLEN SOME OF THE COPPER FROM THE WIRING FROM THE OFFICE.
UH, THE FRONT DOOR THAT USED TO BE THERE HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED.
THIS IS THE SIDE ELEVATION OF THE BUIL STRUCTURED OR BUILDING NUMBER TWO.
AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE MORE OF THE ILLEGAL DUMPING.
THIS IS THE SIDE ELEVATION, STILL STRUCTURE NUMBER TWO.
THIS IS THE PICTURE OF THE REAR ELEVATION OF, UH, BUILDING NUMBER TWO, ONE OF THE BAYS IN BUILDING NUMBER TWO.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S NOT THAT MUCH DAMAGE TO THE STRUCTURE, BUT VAGRANTS ARE GETTING IN AND THEY'RE TRASHING THE PLACE.
THEY ARE THROWING SOME, UM, TIRES, DEBRIS, UH, MATTRESSES.
YOU CAN SEE HOW THEY BUSTED OPEN, UH, THIS WALL HERE.
UH, AND THEN THEY MADE ENTRY THROUGH THE SHEET ROCK FROM ONE OFFICE TO THE OTHER.
UH, THEY'VE BEEN TAKING THE, UH, FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND STARTED THROWING 'EM AGAINST THE WALLS TO GET 'EM STUCK IN THERE.
AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE HOLES.
AND THEN THERE'S ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER LEFT BEHIND WHERE THE VANDALISM, WHERE THEY TRY TO STEAL THE COPPER HOLES ON THE WALL.
THEY'RE LOOKING FOR COPPER TO TAKE OUT.
AND THEN THIS IS, IS ANOTHER BAY DOOR.
[01:35:08]
THIS IS A COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE, UH, BUILDING ONE, NUMBER ONE HAS SUSTAINED FIRE DAMAGE TO THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.FRONT ELEVATION HAS COMPLETELY COLLAPSED.
THE ROOF HAS SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT FIRE DAMAGE, AND THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS HAVE WARPED AND ARE BOEING.
UH, THE B A DOORS HAVE BEEN CUT OR PERMANENTLY DAMAGED.
THE OFFICE PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE HAS A SUSTAINED EXTENSIVE FIRE DAMAGE BUILDING NUMBER TWO HAS BEEN VANDALIZED BY GRAS.
DOORS AND WINDOWS HAVE BEEN BROKEN OR REMOVED, AND COPPER HAS BEEN STOLEN FROM THERE.
UH, TO RECAP, THE STRUCTURES LOCATED AT FOUR 40 PIN ROAD ARE IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56, SUBSECTIONS 2 4 5 7 8 11, 12, 15, AND 17 FOR BUILDING NUMBER ONE AND 8 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18.
FOR BUILDING NUMBER TWO IN WHICH ANY BUILDING ARE STRUCTURES, WHICH AS ANY OR ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OF DEFECTS HEREAFTER DESCRIBED, SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND A HAZARDOUS, A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
PROVIDED THAT SUCH CONDITIONS OF DEFECTS OF DILAPIDATION, SUBSTANDARD ORAL FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION POSE A THREAT OR POTENTIAL THREAT TO LIFE, HEALTH, PROPERTY, OR HUMAN SAFETY, THE STAFF RECOMMENDS DEMOLITION.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION FOR FOUR 40 PIN ROAD.
DOES THE BOARD, DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS? YES, MR. ZUNIGA, I'M GONNA ASK SOME, I'M GONNA ASK SOME QUESTIONS ON THE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN MUNICIPAL, STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HERE.
UH, HERE, WHAT HAPPENED WAS THE FIRE WAS ON JANUARY 22ND, 21ST, 2019, RIGHT? YES, SIR.
UH, WHEN DID YOU, UH, WERE YOU ALL PROACTIVE ON IT OR WAS, UH, ACTIVE COMPLAINT OR, WE WERE CALLED OUT BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
UM, WHEN THE PREVIOUS, UH, THEN THE OFFICER THAT WAS ON CALL ARRIVED.
THE STRUCTURE WAS STILL ON FI ON OR THE BUILDING WAS STILL ON FIRE.
UM, I RESPONDED THE FOLLOWING DAY ONCE THE FIRE HAD BEEN PUT OUT AND IT HAD BEEN CLEARED BY ARSON.
AND THEN AT THAT TIME WE STARTED THE, UH, THE CASE.
UM, E C I HAS BEEN OUT THERE, UH, QUALITY, UH, FOR THE WATER HAS BEEN OUT THERE.
THEY HAVE BEEN INSPECTING 'CAUSE OF THE FIELD TANKS THAT ARE THERE.
UH, THE, THERE WAS A CONTRACTOR THAT HAS ALREADY SIPHONED ALL THE GAS OUT OF THE FIELD PUMPS.
SO CURRENTLY THERE IS NO MORE GAS LEFT AT THE PUMPS.
SO THE GAS WAS PUMPED OUT OF, OF THE TANKS, YOU SAY? YES, SIR.
SO THEN WAS, THERE WAS STILL A PROBLEM WITH SOME GAS OIL RUNNING INTO THE, THE RIVER THERE? YES, SIR.
THAT'S WHY T C I WAS CONTACTED AND, UH, IT TOOK A WHILE BEFORE THAT WAS, UH, ACTION WAS TAKEN ON IT AT THE TIME.
I KNOW YOU DON'T HAVE ANY CONTROL ON IT, THE SAID THE MUNICIPAL, BUT DID YOU CALL, DID YOU CALL 'EM OR SOMETHING? YOU KNOW, IT'S A REAL CONCERN AROUND, THERE'S BEYOND OUR SCOPE TODAY, WE'RE HERE ABOUT THE DEMOLITION.
THE BUILDING'S NOT ABOUT, UH, NO, NO, NO.
IT SITS HERE TOO, UH, OF HAVE YOU SEEN WHERE THE ACTION WAS ON IT? RIGHT HERE ON IT, ON THE DATES.
UH, WE, WE ARE ACCORDING TO, UH, UH, OUR MANUAL HERE, OUR CODE.
WE HAVE, UH, I, I AND I HAVE TO AGREE WITH MR. UH, MR. HARPER.
WE ARE HERE FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THIS BUILDING.
YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES, UH, WE'RE IGNORANT IN OUR OWN SELVES THAT I TAKE BLAME FOR.
JUST, BUT I MEAN, THE THING IS, IS THERE'S STILL SOME OIL AND WATER RUNNING INTO THE CREEK THERE.
HAVE YOU CONTACTED THEM? YES, SIR.
JUST TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, UH, REAL QUICK, UM, WOULD THEY CONTACT THEM? THEY DID SHOW UP.
THEY DID PUT SOME BARRIERS TO TRY TO MAINTAIN THAT OIL.
THE REASON THEY WEREN'T CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY IS BECAUSE THERE WAS NO OIL LEAKING AT THE TIME.
ONCE THE RAINS STARTED COMING AND BAKERS WENT IN AND STARTED GET THE BARRELS OVER, THAT'S WHEN THEY WERE CONTACTED.
WHEN WE STARTED OBSERVING THAT THE OILS HAD BEEN SPILLED.
BUT AT THE TIME OF THE FIRE, THERE WAS NO OILS LEAKING.
SO THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
AND IT'S STILL FLOWING IN THERE.
THIS, THE, WHAT'S IN FRONT OF THIS BOARD TODAY IS WHETHER THE STRUCTURES THAT ARE PRESENTED ARE A DANGER, AND IF THEY ARE, UM, WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO ADDRESS THOSE DANGEROUS STRUCTURES? WE, THIS, THIS BOARD DOES NOT ADDRESS
[01:40:01]
ANY ENVI ANY OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES EXCEPT IN REGARDS TO THE, THE BUILDINGS.UH, MR. BURNS THEN YOU SAY WE SEE SOME HAZARDS GOING, GOING, UH, ANYWHERE WE SEE A BUILDING THAT'S READY TO COLLAPSE AND INSIDE THERE'S HAS MATERIAL THAT WE, THAT CITY SAYS NOTHING.
AM I CORRECT ON IT? I I I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A, A QUESTION OR A STATEMENT.
I, I COULDN'T ANSWER THAT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, BUT I DO KNOW WHAT'S IN, WHAT'S IN FRONT OF THIS BOARD.
UH, IS, ARE THESE STRUCTURES CONSIDERED, UH, DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES AND IF SO, HOW? THIS BOARD THE BEST WAY TO ADDRESS THOSE DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES.
SO HOPEFULLY THE OIL WILL BE CONTAINED, BUT LIKE YOU SAY, YOU'VE DONE YOUR DUTY AND YOU CONTACT THEM.
THE TANKS, AND WE'VE HAD THIS BEFORE, I THINK IT WAS LAST YEAR, A GAS, ONE OF THE GAS STATIONS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
ARE THE TANKS SECURE RIGHT NOW? SO SOMEBODY DOESN'T GET HURT, ARE THEY? YES SIR.
AND OTHER THAN THAT, THERE'S NOTHING SECURE.
SECURE WISE FENCES AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
WELL, BUT AGAIN, WE DO HAVE A CASE OPEN FOR THE SECURITY OF THAT FOUR.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION? THANK YOU SO MUCH.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS PROPERTY? I MOVE THAT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT FOUR 40 PENN ROAD, UH, IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56 SUBSECTIONS FOR BUILDING NUMBER ONE, UH, 2 4 5 7 8 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18.
AND FOR BUILDING TWO SUBSECTIONS, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18.
AND THAT THE BUILDINGS BE DEMOLISHED IN 30 DAYS.
UH, I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND ADD THAT THE PROPERTY BE SECURED UNDER THE REALIZATION THAT IT'S BEEN SECURED, UH, AND IT'S BEEN STOLEN, BUT WE STILL NEED TO SECURE THE PROPERTY.
UH, REAL QUICK, SIR, I FORGOT TO MENTION 18 ON MY STATEMENT.
I DID THAT BUILDING ONE OR BUILDING TWO THAT I'VE FOUND THAT IS ON BUILDING, UH, NUMBER ONE SUBSECTIONS.
UH, AGAIN, I'LL READ 'EM AGAIN.
UH, THESE STRUCTURES LOCATED AT FOUR 40 PENN ROAD IS IN VIOLATIONS OF CITY COURT.
ARTICLE EIGHT, CHAPTER SIX DASH 1 56, SUBSECTIONS 2, 4 5 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18 FOR BUILDING ONE AND 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, AND 18 FOR BUILDING TWO.
COVERED WITH THOSE BASED ON MY NOTES AS WELL.
WELL, I HAVE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT.
IS THE FACT THAT HE TESTIFIED EARLIER ALSO THAT BECAUSE OF VAGRANT STILL, CAN WE PUT A, UH, VACANCY OR, OR A, UH, VACATE SIGN ON THERE? IT MAY NOT WORK, BUT AS LONG AS WE PUT IT UP, WOULD THAT BE ACCEPTABLE? UH, IT'S ACCEPTABLE TO PUT A VACATE SIGN UP, BUT THAT WOULD THEORETICALLY BE PART OF SECURITY.
WHAT DO, SIR, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.
MR. MR. ANDERS, YOU SAID SECOND.
WE HAVE A 30 DAY DEMO ORDER AND SECURED, UH, THE PROPERTY BY MR. NELSON.
WE HAVE A, A SECOND BY MR. ANDERS AND ALSO TO VACATE, PUT A SIGN UP FOR VACATE.
IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.
SO DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
WITH THAT SAID, I THINK THAT'S OUR LAST CASE.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER, UM, ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES THAT WE NEED TO TAKE CARE OF? OKAY, SO ALL WE HAVE FOR THE, UM, LETTER THAT WAS POSTPONED, WE HAVEN'T HAD THAT.
ERIC IS, UH, OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT IS REVIEWING, HE'S GONNA GIMME AN ANSWER TODAY SO THAT, UH, WE CAN SEND IT OFF.
ALL IN FAVOR OF, UH, VACATING THIS BUILDING.
I MOVE THAT, THE, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED.
VACATE THIS BUILDING AND ADJOURNED.
MR. NELSON, UH, MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
[01:45:01]
MR. HARPER? SECONDED.