* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:04] ALL RIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYBODY. IT IS ONE O'CLOCK AND WE WILL CALL THE MONDAY, OCTOBER 14TH, UH, TAC MEETING TO ORDER. WOULD STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL? GEORGE PECK HERE. BRIAN LOPEZ AND AMARI MILO. SAMARA ZUKI. ROBERT SIPES. HERE. MARCO. KIMBERLY . PRESENT. MARIA CRUZ. COLLEEN WACK. HERE. ALLISON COLE. MICHAEL ELDER. MM-HMM? . ASHLEY FAIRMONT. YES. MICHAEL MOORE? YES. RYAN PLUGINS. TACKETT. ARMANDO MELBA. HERE. MATTHEW MATNEY. MICHAEL TAYLOR. HERE. OSA. ROBERT HANLEY. HERE. LUKE ROBINSON. HERE. DOMINIC DOMINGUEZ? HERE. BILL PIERCE. HERE. CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON. ERIC ZA. PRESENT. ANA. PRESENT. BIANCA VO. HERE. BRITTANY JAIL. CRYSTAL MEYER. HERE. MIKE ANDERSON. YES. YUMMY. KAREN. ER. OKAY. HOW OLD BILL WHITE. NO. KEN BROWN. IS THAT THE END OF THE ROLL CALL? ROLL CALL COMPLETED. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND I THINK DURING ROLL CALL, WE HAD COMMISSIONER MILAM CARE AND MICHAEL ELDER SHOW UP AFTER THEIR NAMES WERE CALLED, I BELIEVE. YES, WE ARE PRESENT BUT LATE. ALL RIGHT. UM, CAN WE GET THE SPANISH ENGLISH INTERPRETER PLEASE? MM-HMM, . ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. UM, WE DO HAVE SOME NEW FACES ON THE TAC. UH, WE HAD SOME, UH, SOME, UH, PEOPLE ROLL OFF AND SOME NEW PEOPLE ON. SO LET'S JUST REAL QUICK GO AROUND THE ROOM AND INTRODUCE OURSELVES AND KIND OF WHAT YOUR POSITION IS. I'LL START. GEORGE PECK, UH, CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CHAIRMAN OF THIS COMMITTEE, AND I WORK AT KCI TECHNOLOGIES HERE IN SAN ANTONIO. I'M A CIVIL ENGINEER. I AM OH YEAH. . IT'S BEEN TOO LONG. I'VE FORGOTTEN. I'M A NEWBIE, RIGHT. I'M KARA TACKETT. I AM WITH PAP DAWSON ENGINEERS AND SERVE IN AN ENGINEERING ROLE. I'M CRYSTAL MEYER AND I'M A COMMUNITY BOARD MEMBER. I AM A REALTOR, A LENDER, AND I HAVE A SOBER LIVING FACILITY. UH, I'M MICHAEL ELDER. UM, I WORK FOR OXBOW DEVELOPMENT GROUP. UM, I'M THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY, MY NAME IS DOMINIC DOMINGUEZ. I AM THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF GUARDIA GARDENS, AND I AM THE, UH, ENVIRONMENTAL PRIMARY. I'M MIKE ANDERSON. I'M THE COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE FROM [00:05:01] CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 10. I'M COLLEEN WABA. I'M A COMMUNITY MEMBER. I RESIDE IN DISTRICT NINE AND I'M CHAIR OF NORTHSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR ORGANIZED DEVELOPMENT. KIM BRAGMAN, PRO TEM OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND A REALTOR FOR PHYLLIS BROWNING. PHILLIP MANNA, UH, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DISTRICT SEVEN. AND THEN, UM, ALSO PRESIDENT OF THE AMO BARNSTEAD ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND HAVE BEEN ENGAGED IN SEVERAL OF THE LARGER, UM, UM, QUARTER PLANS. ERIC ESTRADA, UM, COMMUNITY MEMBER, UH, DISTRICT FIVE, AND ALSO PRESIDENT OF LOS ENA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. BIANCA MALDONADO. I'M A COMMUNITY MEMBER ON P TAC. I LIVE IN MONTICELLO PARK IN DISTRICT SEVEN. I SERVE ON MY NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD, AND I'M ALSO A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE TIER ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION. ROB SIPES. I AM THE CHAIR OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, AND I AM AN ARCHITECT WITH MARVIN MOCK ARCHITECTURE. UH, LUKE ROBINSON. I'M AN ARCHITECT, UH, WITH RVK ARCHITECTS, MARLA ENGINEER WITH COLLIERS ENGINEERING DESIGN. I, JAY HOWELL, COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE. UH, I LIVE OVER THE BLUFF, WEST CHASE DISTRICT SEVEN, ALSO A MEMBER OF STRONG TOWNS. PHIL PIERCE. I'M A GEOSCIENTIST WITH S-W-E-C-A MICHAEL MOORE. I'M AN ALTERNATE AND I REPRESENT THE REAL ESTATE COUNSEL AS A DEVELOPMENT, UH, REPRESENTATIVE, UH, ROBERT HANLEY. AND, AND NO, I'M NOT A NEWBIE. BEEN HERE SINCE OH, AUGUST OH FOUR. UH, I'M AN A SELF-EMPLOYED ARCHITECT, ASHLEY FAIRMONT WITH THE KILLING GRIFFIN IN FAIRMONT. I'M A LAND USE ATTORNEY MICHAEL TAYLOR WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO, AND I'M IN THE PLANNING PROFESSIONAL CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON. I'M A RESEARCHER IN WATER LAW AND WATER HERITAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE ADAPTATION. AND I'M THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PRIMARY MILAM. I'M ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND I'M A PSYCHIATRIST. ALL RIGHT. I THINK THAT'S EVERYBODY. UH, WE'LL NOW MOVE [Public Comment  ] TO PUBLIC COMMENT. I BELIEVE WE HAVE SOME VOICEMAILS PROBABLY MIXED BETWEEN THE TWO ITEMS, AND WE'LL GET STARTED ON THOSE. YES. AND I'D LIKE TO LIMIT THE TIME TO TWO MINUTES TODAY. YES. WE HAVE, UH, 70 VOICEMAILS. YES. TWO MINUTES WORK. I LIVE AT ONE 10 WEST LINWOOD, AND I AM, MY PHONE NUMBER'S (210) 347-5648, AND I AM CALLING ABOUT THIS HORRIBLE PLAN TO HAVE BUSES AND REROUTE TRAFFIC THROUGH OUR MONTE VISTA HISTORIC DISTRICT. UH, IS WE ARE ALL TOTALLY OPPOSED TO THIS. UM, THIS IS A HISTORIC DISTRICT. IT NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT'S A WALKING DISTRICT FOR ALL THE NEIGHBORS AND EVERYBODY PARKS THEIR CAR AND THEY DRIVE OVER HERE TO ENJOY THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE NOT GONNA ALLOW HEAVY TRAFFIC OF CARS CUTTING THROUGH OUR QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD, SPEEDING WITH ALL OUR CHILDREN OUT ON THE ROAD AND REROUTING TO MAKE A RUIN A NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S BUSY, BUSY STREETS THAT CARS CAN CONTINUE TO GO THROUGH, BUT WE WILL NOT ALLOW CARS JUST TO BE CUTTING THROUGH AND REROUTED INTO A PERSONAL NEIGHBORHOOD THAT BELONGS TO THE COMMUNITY HERE IS VERY UNACCEPTABLE, AND YOU DO NOT HAVE PERMISSION TO DO THIS THROUGH ARM MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY. WE ARE JUST VERY, JUST HOW COULD YOU RUIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD JUST TO REROUTE TRAFFIC? I THINK YOU HAVE OTHER OPTIONS TO GO A DIFFERENT ROUTE TO MAKE THIS PLAN WORK FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENT, BUT YOU DON'T CONTINUE TO JUST RUIN SOMETHING ELSE TO DO SOMETHING ELSE FOR THE CITY. THIS IS ALWAYS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS WHEN THE CITY'S INVOLVED. THEY DON'T HAVE PLANNING, PROPER PLANNING. SO, UM, DO NOT GIVE MY SUPPORT TO THIS. AND WE ARE IN MONTE VISTA. WE WANT TO KEEP IT A NICE, QUIET, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. IT'S J ZEN N-O-T-Z-O-N. THE THIRD ADDRESS, 1 0 7 EAST GRAMER SCENE. UH, THIS IS ON THE, UH, THE VOTE ON THE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CODE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TASK FORCE. THEY WILL, THESE MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING [00:10:01] TOD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION AS REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. UH, HI THERE. THIS IS ROBERT BROWN, UH, HOMEOWNER AT 3 1 5 WEST LINWOOD AVENUE, SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. UH, MY PHONE NUMBER IS (512) 751-3411. UH, I'M CALLING TO, UH, SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED COD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY, UH, COTA C-O-S-A-C-O-D TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING POD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM POD ZONING. CURRENTLY, THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MY NAME IS SUSAN CUNNINGHAM NICHOL. I LIVE AT 1 0 6 EAST HOLLYWOOD AVENUE AND I AM CALLING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS, UH, FOR THE MONDAY, THE MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 14TH, UH, IN WHICH, UH, THE PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS WILL BE REVIEWED. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 735-2355. UM, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TRANSIT OR, AND, UH, DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE. UH, I, THE, I AM SORRY, THE, THE CUSTOMIZED TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TASK FORCE. UH, IN ORDER TO PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY, UH, NO MATTER THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY FROM TOD ZONING, UM, THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS, AND I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. UM, WE WANT TO PRESERVE THE RESIDENTIAL, UH, CHARACTER OF OUR HISTORIC DISTRICT AND PROTECT IT, UH, FROM ANY KIND OF CHANGE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BYE. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CYNTHIA FOX. MY ADDRESS IS 2 2 7 EAST MULBERRY NUMBER TWO SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 860-4376. I HAVE, UH, TWO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, ONE I LIVE IN, ONE MY SISTER AND HER CHILDREN LIVE IN, IN MONTE VISTA. AND I AM CALLING, UH, WITH COMMENTS ON THE POD AMENDMENT. UM, I WOULD LIKE TO JUST, UH, LEAVE A MESSAGE SAYING THAT I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL INT OD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. SO MY CONCERNS ARE HAVING A VOICE, UM, WITH, UM, ALCOHOL USE IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS DURING ANY REZONING PROCESS. AGAIN, MY NAME IS CYNTHIA FOX. MY NUMBER'S 2 1 0 8 6 0 4 3 7 6. THANK YOU. HI, MY NAME IS KENNETH BARRETT. I LIVE AT TWO 11 CORNETT IN CROWN HILL PARK. UH, I'M CALLING TO OPPOSE THE AIRPORT [00:15:01] TO DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE A OD TASK FORCE. UM, THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC AND DRAINAGE OF PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND UH, I BELIEVE THIS PLAN IS NOT GOOD FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD DOES NOT EVEN HAVE, UH, ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND I FEEL THAT THIS IS, UM, THE BEST WAY, UH, NOT THE BEST WAY FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD. UH, YOU CAN REACH ME AT AREA CODE 2 1 0 8 6 5 5 0 9 3. ONCE AGAIN, I'M OPPOSED IN THE TMD AIRPORT RECTOR, UM, SECTION. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS NICHOLAS ANDREW JOHNSON. I'M AT 2 1 0 3 4 3 9 3 7 9. MY ADDRESS IS 1 2 1 WEST RIDGEWOOD COURT, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 2. I'M CALLING IN REFERENCE TO THE TOD AMENDMENTS. SO THESE ARE MY COMMENTS ON THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON S SA SPEAK UP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TD TASK FORCE, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM THE TOD CURRENTLY TO OD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION OR S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SLASH SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ADD THAT THE MONTE VISTA TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HAD NO REPRESENTATION ON THE TOD TASK FORCE, YET SEVERAL PROPERTIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARIES AND THE NCD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITHIN THE TOD. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS EMILY FRAGA AND I LIVE AT 7 1 9 PASS IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS OF LESS THAN 7 99 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES 42 BED TYPE A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES AND SUNRISE GARDENS VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TDOT'S CLOSURES OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITY. SO WHILE THE NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF THE ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARY TO BE MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT IZA WEST OF LA PLAZA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF THE CIVILIANS NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THANK YOU. HI, THIS IS MAURICIO SANCHEZ. I LIVE AT 7 1 9 COLE WIND PASS IN CROWN HILL PARK. THESE ARE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE T-O-T-T-O-D TASK FORCE. WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS LESS THAN $799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES 42 BED TYPE A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES IN SUNRISE GARDEN VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BO LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TECH STOPS CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF HIGH, OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. THE CITY OF [00:20:01] SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 STAKEHOLDERS ON THE T-O-T-T-O-D TASK FORCE. AND AS SUCH, WE WEREN'T EVEN NOTIFIED ABOUT THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE BOUNDARY MAP BE MOVED NORTH OF WOLF ROAD AT I WEST OF LA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILIONS NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THANKS, CONRAD. I'M CALLING FOR MYSELF AND MY HUSBAND ALAN CONRAD. WE LIVE AT TWO 10 WEST GRAMERCY PLACE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. PHONE NUMBER TWO TEN SEVEN TWO FIVE EIGHT THREE NINE SEVEN. UH, WE'RE CALLING IN REFERENCE TO COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. UH, WE SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY CSIS TOD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. WE SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL, ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD TO ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. TO PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. WE SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN POD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THIS IS COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENT. MY NAME IS JAMES MARTINEZ AND I LIVE AT 2 0 6 CORONA STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 6 IN TOWN HILL PARK. AND I OPPOSE THE APPROVAL OF THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED BY APPROVAL BY THE COD TASK FORCE WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE THERE ARE 1200, THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZER AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY OF RENTS LESS THAN 799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDEN VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONALLY, HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY, MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TECH DISCLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE AND OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. THE SAN ANTONIO, THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 AT STAKEHOLDERS ON THE POD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARY BE MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT ISO WEST OF LA PLAZA, DEL NORTE, DEL NORTE, SORRY, AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. MY NAME IS DAWN BAE. I LIVE AT 1 1 6 0 1 INTRIGUE DRIVE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 6. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO REC TO RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED BY APPROVED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TAX FORCE. THANK YOU. DAWN VAE 1 1 6 0 1 INTRIGUE DRIVE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 6, UH, AMENDMENT. MY NAME IS MARIA PROGRESS AND I LIVE AT 2 0 6 CORNETT IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE APPROVE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY TASK FORCE WITHIN A HALF MILE RATED. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE OVER A 1,200 SUBSIDIZED AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENT LESS THAN 799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDEN SUITE, WHICH IS THE LARGEST GORDON HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. A ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY, MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TEXAS, UH, DOTS CLOSURE OF MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND [00:25:01] INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TICKET. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDES NEIGHBORHOODS OF NORTH FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TODD DASHBOARD. AS SUCH, WE ARE, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST MAP BOUNDARIES BEING MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD. AT I WITH OF LA AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION NORTH SHOPPING CENTER ON THE TOP AMENDMENT. MY NAME IS MARIA TORRES AND I LIVE AT 2 0 6 CORT IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TASK FORCE WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE OVER 12 SUB 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENT LESS THAN 799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDENS V, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL, UH, FIRSTLY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TEXTILE DISCLOSURE OF THE STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN ITY. SO WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO VE THE BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOP TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST MAP BOUNDARIES BEING MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT ITEM WEST OF LA AND SOUTH OF THE KILION NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS? MY NAME IS NORMAN TAYLOR. I LIVE AT 3 35 SERNA DRIVE IN HARMONY HILLS. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT AND RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THERE ARE OVER 1,200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT, MANY WITH THE RENTS OF LESS THAN $799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDENS ONS, WHICH IS VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES, UH, TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. TXDOT HAS PLANS FOR CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND INBOUND TRAFFIC FROM TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. THIS WILL CAUSE ALL SORTS OF PROBLEMS. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS INCLUDING G-H-H-N-A NORTH OF FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS IN THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARY TO BE MOVED TO WOLF ROAD ATUM WEST OF THE LA PLAZA, NORTE, AND SOUTH TO THE PAVILIONS NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THANK YOU CROP. AND THAT'S SPELLED KR O2 PS LIKE IN PETER AND I LIVE AT 2 2 3 SONATA DRIVE IN HARMON HILL SUBDIVISION 7 8 2 1 6. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. MY PHONE NUMBER IS TWO TEN TWO SIX ZERO FOUR TWO ZERO FIVE. I OPPOSE IT. I OPPOSE IT. I OPPOSE IT. MY NAME IS JAMES CROP. I LIVE AT 2 2 3 SONATA DRIVE IN HARMONY HILLS SUBDIVISION 7 8 2 1 6. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARIES MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. THIS HAS BEEN RUSHED THROUGH TOO MANY TIMES. TOO MANY THINGS ARE NOT ANSWERED. I REALLY FEEL LIKE THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO PEOPLE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO ASK QUESTIONS. THIS IS A BAD THING. IT'S BAD FOR THE CITY AND IT'S BAD FOR THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE INVESTED IN THEIR HOMES ALL THIS TIME. REMEMBER WE HAVE ELECTIONS COMING UP AND ALL [00:30:01] THIS GOES BACK TO ONE PERSON, OUR PEOPLE, THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. 2 1 0 2 9 1 0 7 9 0 2 1 0 2 9 1 0 7 9 OH. COMMENTS ON THE TO DIX. MY NAME IS DAMIEN PIN. I LIVE AT 2 0 6 CORT AND CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSED TO THE AIRPORT RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP, THE CITY DID NOT INCLUDE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. THE CITY DENIES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS CONCERNS ABOUT INCREASING HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE EXISTING CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC, FLOODING AND PUBLIC SAFETY, AND WE DESERVE TO HAVE OUR VOICES HEARD. PLEASE ASK THE POD TASK FORCE TO RECONSIDER THE BOUNDARIES TO PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD JUST LIKE THEY PROTECTED MONTY VISTA FROM HIGH DENSITY HOUSING. THANK YOU. GOODBYE. MY NAME IS BEATRICE MORENO AND I LIVE AT 4 22 EAST MISTO AVENUE IN DISTRICT ONE. MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (210) 737-6442. THIS CALL IS IN REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSED TOD CODE AMENDMENT DRAFT BEING PRESENTED MONDAY, OCTOBER 14TH. I'M A MEMBER OF THE T ONE NC GROUP. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY OWNED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN HALF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVE IN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I NAME IS JENNIFER MELDRUM AND I'M CALLING ON BEHALF OF MYSELF AND MY HUSBAND EDWARD EATON. WE LIVE AT 3 0 2 WEST GRAMERCY PLACE, SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO AND MY CELL PHONE NUMBER IS TWO 10, UH 3 5 5 9 5 5 3. I'M LEAVING A COMMENT ON THE POD AMENDMENT. UM, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD BOUNDARY MAPS AS FROM TOD DISTRICTS. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED, UH, LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. I SUPPORT ALSO THE, UH, APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN POD DISTRICTS. I HOPE THAT THIS IS USEFUL INFORMATION TO YOU, THAT WE CARE VERY MUCH ABOUT THIS AND I HOPE THAT YOU WILL, UH, VOTE THIS WAY. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS FREDERICA KUSHNER. I LIVE AT 4 0 5 EAST MYRTLE STREET IN SAN ANTONIO, SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 223-2814. THESE ARE MY COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN A HALF INCH, ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD ENCOURAGE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD DISTRICTS. [00:35:01] A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU. CALLING IN REFERENCE TO COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. MY NAME IS PAUL KENNISON JR. I LIVE AT FOUR 18 WEST FRENCH PLACE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. I SUPPORT VIAS PLANS FOR TWO ADVANCED RAPID TRANSIT BUS LINES KNOWN AS THE GREEN LINE FOR THE SAN PEDRO CORRIDOR. FROM STEVES AVENUE TO ISOM ROAD AND THE SILVER LINE NORTH GENERAL MCMULLEN TO FROST CENTER. I SUPPORT THE APPROVED APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. I RECOMMEND THAT CURRENT UDC ZONING REGULATIONS AND CURRENT HISTORIC DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES REMAIN IN PLACE AND REMAIN ENFORCEABLE IN ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERATION OF MY OPINION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. MY NAME IS KAREN KING AND I'M OPPOSED TO THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP CHANGE. I DO NOT WANT MORE HOUSING PUT IN HARMONY HILLS AREA. I OWN PROPERTY AT SIX 10, I'M SORRY, THREE 10 WEST SILVERSON. MY NAME AGAIN IS KAREN KING AND DO NOT PUT LOW HOUSING IN THAT AREA. THE CRIME RATE IS HIGH ENOUGH AS IT IS. I'M OPPOSED TO THAT BOUNDARY MAP CHANGE. THANK YOU. THIS IS CARL ROBIN TEAGUE. MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS TWO TEN SEVEN THREE FIVE THREE SIX ZERO SIX. MY ADDRESS IS 3 0 6 WEST KINGS HIGHWAY, SAN ANTONIO 7 8 2 1 2. I'M CALLING ABOUT COMMENTS ON THE POD AMENDMENTS. I WANT ADOPTION OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY OSAS OR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TASK FORCE. I WANT TO PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I ALSO WANT SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTY TO BE EXCLUDED REGARDLESS OF BLOT SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY, TOD ZONING CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT INCONSISTENT WITH AND IN CONFLICT WITH MONTE VISTA, WHICH IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA AND A HISTORICAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE AND SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. I AM OPPOSED TO ESTABLISHMENT OF BARS IN MONTE VISTA. THANK YOU. HI, MY NAME IS LAURA BAUM, L-A-U-R-A-B-A-U-C-U-M. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 827-2197 AND MY HOME ADDRESS IS 1 26 EAST KINGS HIGHWAY 7 8 2 1 2. I AM CALLING BECAUSE I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TAX. TAX FORCE. [00:40:02] I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. BYE-BYE. ABOUT THE TOD AMENDMENT. THIS IS ROBERT ESTRO AND I'VE LIVED AT 2 2 4 WEST MULBERRY AVENUE IN MONTE VISTA, HISTORIC DISTRICT FOR ALMOST 31 YEARS. BECAUSE MULBERRY AVENUE IS A LOCAL AND A COLLECTIVE STREET THAT IS MULBERRY AVENUE WITH ONE OF ONLY TWO STREETS AND MONTE VISTA. WITH ACCESS TO 2 81, I'VE DEALT WITH SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC CONGESTION DURING RUSH HOUR AND FEEDING VEHICLES AT OTHER TIMES FOR THREE DECADES NOW, THE TWO DEDICATED DIAMOND BUS LANES ON THE NEW GREEN LINE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RAYS SPORTING PLATFORMS PROPOSED AT WEST MULBERRY AVENUE IN SAN PEDRO BOULEVARD WILL ONLY DIVERT ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ONTO MY ALREADY CONGESTED STREET THAT FALLS BETWEEN TWO SCHOOLS, ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL, THE MARK TWAIN DUAL LANGUAGE ACADEMY. HAVING SAID THIS, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED COD BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL PSYCHOSIS TOD TASK FORCE BECAUSE THEY PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS BECAUSE IT, BECAUSE IT ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO HAVE AN OPINION ON THE DAILY LIVING SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR, UH, FOR ACCEPTING VOICEMAILS AND TAKING THE CONCERNS OF MONTE VISTA RESIDENCE. SERIOUSLY, THIS IS ROBERT ESTRO, 2 1 0 9 1 2 5 4 9 6. GOODBYE. MY NAME IS CHER, SHER BROOKS. MY ADDRESS IS 3 0 6 WEST KINGS HIGHWAY, SAN ANTONIO SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (210) 735-3606. I'M CALLING ABOUT TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S TOD TASK FORCE. I WANT TO PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTY SHOULD BE EXCLUDED REGARDLESS OF LOT SIZE FROM TOD ZONING, APPLICATION OF TOD ZONING TO PROPERTY ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LARGER THAN ONE HALF ACRE WOULD ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT INCONSISTENT AND IN CONFLICT WITH MONTE VISTA, WHICH IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD DISTRICTS. I WANT TO SPEAK OUT ON LIFE AND SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. I AM AGAINST BARS IN MONTE VISTA. THANK YOU. I'M THERESA PENA AND I LIVE AT 4 0 2 DOWNS SHIRE IN CROWNSVILLE PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED, APPROVED BY THE TODD TASK FORCE. I OPPOSE IT. THANK YOU. BYE. REFERENCING COMMENTS TO THE TOD AMENDMENT. MY NAME IS JULIE BRYAN. I LIVE AT ONE ONE ONE EAST ELLWOOD AVENUE. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 573-5279 AND I HAVE A FEW THINGS TO SAY HERE. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TODD BOUNDARY MAPS RECOMMENDED BY THE APPROVAL OF C TODD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TODD DISTRICTS. ALSO, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONES PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF ITS SIZE FROM ZONING ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TODD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE THE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE [00:45:01] PROPOSED TODD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. ALSO, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TODD DISTRICT. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU AND I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. NEWMAN JUNIOR AT TWO OH THREE BUSHNELL. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 355-5123. MY WIFE AND I HAVE OWNED OUR HOME FOR OVER 25 YEARS. WE BOTH GREW UP IN MONTE VISTA AND SELECTED OUR HOME BECAUSE IT IS IN A PROTECTED HISTORIC DISTRICT. REGARDING COMMENTS ON THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICT AMENDMENTS, I SUPPORT ONE, THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TASK FORCE TWO, THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. AND THREE, THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICTS. MANY THANKS TO THE COMMITTEE FOR ALL ITS WORK ON THESE PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS. HI, MY NAME IS ERIN ZAKO. I AM A HOME OWNER AT 7 1 4 WEST RUSSELL PLACE IN THE ALTA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I'D LIKE TO LEAVE SOME COMMENTS, UH, REGARDING THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I AM A BIG FAN OF ENCOURAGING NEW COMPATIBLE UH, DEVELOPMENT IN THE ALTA VISTA. WE WANT THAT TO BE SAFE, WE WANT WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS, WE WANT LOTS OF GREAT DESTINATIONS, UM, BUT WE ALSO WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT IS SENSITIVE TO THE CONDI, UH, EXISTING, THE ALREADY BUILT ENVIRONMENT. UM, AND SO THEREFORE I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP. UM, AND THOSE ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE POD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT EXCLUDING ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE. AND I ALSO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD UH, DISTRICTS THAT WOULD GIVE NEIGHBORHOODS, UH, MORE SAY, UM, IN WHAT HAPPENED, UM, WITH, UH, THE CONSUMPTION OF, OF ALCOHOL, UH, NEAR THE, THE TODS, UH, OR IN THE TD. SO, UM, FINALLY, I'D ALSO LIKE TO SAY THAT I THINK IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT THE CROWN HILL PARK, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD AND OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 WERE LEFT OUT OF THE TOD TASK FORCE AND I, UM, SUPPORT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, UH, REQUEST TO, UH, MOVE THE BOUNDARY MAPS, UH, NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT ISO AND WEST OF LA PLAZA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HEARING MY COMMENTS AND HAVE A GREAT DAY. BYE-BYE. AND THIS IS CHARLES RICHARD CLEMONS, C-L-E-M-O-N-S. I, UH, RESIDE AT, UH, 2 4 1 WEST LINWOOD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 2. AND UH, THAT'S MY, UM, THAT'S MY HOMESTEAD. I'VE LIVED IN THE MONTE VISTA AREA SINCE 1987 AND UH, I WANTED TO PRESENT A, A COUPLE OF COMMENTS IN REGARD TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ONE, I REALLY SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS THAT WERE ALREADY RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY SSA'S TOD TASK FORCE. UH, I REALLY, UH, THINK THAT SINCE I ATTENDED THE MEETING AT TRINITY AND ONE OF THE CITY PLANNERS, I THINK KAT FERNANDO MENTIONED THAT HOUSE, UH, RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LESS THAN A HALF AN ACRE WERE PROTECTED. I THINK ALL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, AT LEAST HOMESTEADS SHOULD BE PROTECTED. AND, UH, I ALSO, UH, THINK THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ONLY DO TO SOME HOUSING AND NOT OTHERS. UH, SHE POTENTIALLY, UH, SHE MADE THE COMMENT THAT THE PLAN INVOLVED THIS, UH, CHANGEOVER OF THE PROPERTIES OF A, OF A GREATER THAN A HALF AN ACRE THAT WE'RE NOT UNDER REZONING, BUT SOME OTHER, [00:50:01] WHAT THAT SOUNDS LIKE DEFACTO REZONING THAT ALLOWS A DIFFERENT PROCESS TO OVERRIDE THE REZONING. AND I THINK IT'S SEEMS DISINGENUOUS THAT IT'S NOT MORE TRANSPARENT. I ALSO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL, SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN CONNOR CALLING. I'M THE FORMER CITY COUNCILWOMAN OF DISTRICT EIGHT. I REMAIN ACTIVE IN WHAT IS HAPPENING IN OUR CITY. THIS IS OF VITAL IMPORTANCE, SO I HOPE YOU'RE ACTUALLY HEARING WHAT THE PUBLIC IS SENDING INTO YOU. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE ILU, THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM OD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD BE AN INCENTIVE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. MY ADDRESS IS 3 1 1 NOTTING WEST NOTTINGHAM DRIVE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 9. I LOOK FORWARD TO YOU LISTENING TO EVERY COMMENT. THANK YOU. BONNIE CONNOR. HELLO, THIS IS ANN NEWMAN AND I LIVE AT 2 0 3 BUSHNELL AVENUE IN MONTE VISTA. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 508-7884 AND I AM CALLING TODAY TO COMMENT ON THE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DISTRICT AMENDMENTS BECAUSE I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I SUPPORT, UH, THREE OF THEM. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED COD BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S DOD TAX FORCE AND THE, I DEFINITELY SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE FROM THET OD ZONING AND, UM, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIALIZED SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN THESE DISTRICTS. UM, I ALSO WANTED TO JUST SAY THAT I HAVE LIVED IN MONTE VISTA ALL MY LIFE, UH, GREW UP ON ELSMERE AND I, THE ATTRACTION TO OUR BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD IS BECAUSE IT IS PROTECTIVENESS TOWARDS DISTRICTS AND I WOULD HOPE THAT, UM, THE CITY WOULD BE ABLE TO RESPECT WHAT WE WORKED SO HARD FOR 50 YEARS AGO AND HAVE BEEN ABLE TO MAINTAIN, UH, SINCE TO KEEP IT A NEIGHBORHOOD AND, UM, DON'T INFRINGE ON ITS BOUNDARIES. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH, UH, FOR LISTENING AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT THE COMMITTEE HAS DONE ON THESE, UH, PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS. THANKS SO MUCH. BYE-BYE. MY NAME IS MICHAEL NYE. I AM AT ONE 14 WEST ELLWOOD. ZIP CODE IS SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 857-5404. I'M CALLING TO COMMENT ON THE TOD AGREEMENT, UH, AMENDMENTS, EXCUSE ME, ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. UH, I WANTED TO STATE THAT I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY SSA'S TOD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. ALSO, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM THE TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING CAN APPLY TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. THANK YOU SO [00:55:01] MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. HELLO, THIS IS GRETCHEN ROSE, TWO 15 MISSION STREET, SAN ANTONIO, 7 7 2 6 9 6 1 9 1 8. UM, I'M CALLING IN REFERENCE TO THE TOD AMENDMENT, THE DIN STEERING COMMITTEE. UM, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON THE SA SPEAK UP AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONING PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM THE TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS, A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION AS ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU AGAIN, GRETCHEN ROSE, TWO 15 MISSION STREET 7 8 2 1 0. THANK YOU. BYE. THIS IS FOR THE P-C-T-A-C. MY NAME IS TED RA WITH THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. I AM THE PRESIDENT. UH, THE OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS 20 23 52 WEST MULBERRY, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 1 AND JA IS OFFERING COMMENTS ON THE TODD AMENDMENT. NUMBER ONE JA SUPPORTS THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TODD BOUNDARIES MAP CURRENTLY ON THE SPEAK SA. SPEAK UP AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TA TODD. TASK FORCE NUMBER TWO J AND A SUPPORTS THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE FROM THE TODD DISTRICT NUMBER THREE J AND A SUPPORTS THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TODD DISTRICT. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD VOICE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE AND SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. NUMBER FOUR, ALL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS ADJACENT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE PARKING. THANK YOU. UH, GOOD MORNING. THIS IS DON MATHIS. I'M JUST CALLING TO REGISTER, UH, MY DISAPPROVAL OF THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. I THINK THE GREEN LINE IS A BAD IDEA. UH, UH, SO PLEASE, UH, REGISTER ANOTHER PERSON THAT, UM, IS VERY MUCH AGAINST THE ADVANCED RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR, UH, UH, THE GREEN LINE OR ANY OTHER NAME THAT, UH, THAT THEY CARE TO CALL IT. AGAIN, THIS IS DON MATHIS. MY ADDRESS IS 29 19 NORTH MAIN AVENUE IN SAN ANTONIO, SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 438-3241. THANK YOU MITCH. HAVE A GREAT DAY. HI, I'M CALLING ABOUT THE COMMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION ORIENTED DISTRICT AT, UM, IN THE CROWN HILL PARK SUBDIVISION. MY NAME IS THE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. MY NAME IS VIRGINIA COVIAS AND I LIVE AT THREE 15 MARQUEE LANE IN CROWN HILL PARK AND I OPPOSE THE APPROVAL OF THE AIRPORT RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY, UM, 80 PLUS SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS OF LESS THAN $799 A MONTH. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE THE ONLY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT SURROUNDED BY THREE SIDES OF THE AREA THAT WILL BE IMPACTED BY THOSE COD AMENDMENTS. THERE ARE ALREADY SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, INCLUDING THE RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE 350 PLUS APARTMENT UNIT COMPLEX ON 2 81 IN JO SMALLBERG. THE ADDITION OF A BASEBALL STADIUM AT THE ALAMO HEIGHTS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITY, IT ALREADY IS AN AUDITORIUM, ALREADY HAS INCREASED THE TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANTLY. UM, THERE'S ALSO AN INTENDED TEXT STOCK CLOSURE OF MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE, OUTBOUND AND INBOUND THAT WILL TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN EVEN MORE TRAFFIC WITH POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE A NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, [01:00:01] WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. SINCE MOST OF THE STREETS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ARE ALREADY CLOSED OFF. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED, HAS THIS COMMENT IS FOR THE P-C-T-A-C. MY NAME IS TED RA WITH THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. I AM THE PRESIDENT. UH, THE OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS 2352 WEST MULBERRY, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 1 AND JA IS OFFERING COMMENTS. JENNIFER, JENNIFER VON DURHEIM. I LIVE AT 3 0 9 WEST AGARITA AVENUE, SAN ANTONIO, 7 8 2 1 2. UM, AND I'M CALLING WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENT. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED. UM, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD'S DISTRICTS. I ALSO WANT TO SAY I DO NOT SUPPORT THE GREEN LINE. I DO NOT SUPPORT WHAT VIA WANTS TO DO. WE DO NOT WANT BUS LANES FROM HILDEBRAND TO ASHBY. THIS WILL HAVE A VERY NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS WELL KNOWN. MY NAME IS DEAN BRADY. I LIVE AT TWO THREE OH EAST ROSEWOOD IN THE MONTE VISTA HISTORIC DISTRICT. I'M CALLING TO SAY THAT I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE TOD BOUNDARY MAPS BY COA TOD TASK FORCE. I ALSO SUPPORT THE INCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS RANDY RO. THAT'S SPELLED O-S-H-E-R-O-W. I LIVE AT 4 2 2 EAST ROSEWOOD I OFFICE AT THREE FOUR TWO WEST WOODLAWN. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 738-3001. MY EXTENSION IS 2 1 2. THIS IS IN REGARD TO COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD BOUNDARY MAP MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY TOD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE, INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF THEIR SIZE. I SUPPOSE I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR TAKING MY OPINIONS INTO CONSIDERATION. UH, GOODBYE. THIS IS REGARDING COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENT. CECILIA RO I OFFICE AT 3 4 2 WEST WOODLAWN AVENUE. I OWN THAT BUILDING ON THE CORNER OF SAN PEDRO AND WOODLAWN AND I ALSO LIVE AT 4 2 2 EAST ROSEWOOD AVENUE. I ALSO OWN APARTMENTS ON THE EL MIR AND SAN PEDRO LOCATION, AS WELL AS SEVERAL APARTMENTS THAT I OWN IN MONTE VISTA AND ALTA VISTA. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD BOUNDARY MAP AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY CSAS POD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING POD DISTRICT. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM POD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED COD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED COD ZONING [01:05:01] MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SITE. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICT. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. AND ALL OF THESE SHOULD APPLY TO EVERYBODY THAT'S IN ON THAT LINE. THAT IS, UH, THE TOD, UH, WHERE THE VIA LINE, THE GREEN BUS LINE STARTING FROM THE TOP OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THIS SHOULD APPLY TO ALL THE NEIGHBORHOODS TO BE PROTECTED FROM, FROM, YOU KNOW, UH, ALL THE THINGS THAT ARE, THAT ARE HAPPENING IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HI, UH, MY NAME IS PETER JAMES HUGILL. I'M AT 2 1 8 WEST ELLWOOD AVENUE IN SAN ANTONIO AND I WISH TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. UH, I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY SSA'S TOD TASK FORCE. UH, I WANT TO PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY PRESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TO D ZONING. UH, CURRENTLY I THINK THE PRE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. I'D LIKE TO SEE THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. AND FINALLY, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS TRUDY C KINISON? MY ADDRESS IS 4 1 8 WEST FRENCH PLACE SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 857-7289 AND I'M CALLING IN REGARD TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 35 UDC SECTION 35 DASH 3 42 TOD AND SECTION 35 DASH FIVE 10 BUFFERS. I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I DO SUPPORT VIA PLANS FOR TWO ADVANCED RAPID TRANSIT BUS LINE, KNOWN AS THE GREEN LINE AND THE SILVER LINE. I ALSO WANTED TO TELL YOU THAT I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM THE TOD ZONING. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. I RECOMMEND THAT CURRENT UDC ZONING REGULATIONS AND CURRENT HISTORIC DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES REMAIN IN PLACE AND REMAIN ENFORCEABLE IN ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF MY OPINION. BY HELLO, THIS IS JUDITH L. WARREN, 2 1 8 WEST LOWELL WOOD IN SAN ANTONIO, 7 8 2 1 2. AND I'M CALLING IN REFERENCE TO MAKING COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. FIRST OF ALL, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY CAA TOD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. SECONDLY, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM THE TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE HALF OR ACRE LOT. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. AND FINALLY, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION, [01:10:01] UH, REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND I APPRECIATE THE WORK YOU'RE DOING. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (979) 324-1184. MY NAME IS EDMUND WICK AND I LIVE AT 2 1 5 DOWNS SHIRE IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARY MAP WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS OF LESS THAN 799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDEN VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONALLY, HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TDO CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN, UH, PEDESTRIAN FACI, UH, UH, FA FATALITIES. SO WE, WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARIES TO BE MO MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT ISM WEST OF LA PLAZA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THERE MORE, THERE'S MORE. MY ADDRESS IS 3 2 0 4, I'M SORRY. MY AS ADDRESS IS 2 31 LAUREL HEIGHTS PLACE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 2. THIS MESSAGE IS INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 14TH, 2024 IN SAN ANTONIO. YOUR INSTRUCTIONS ARE TO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD THAT IS THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT CODE BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY CSAS OF TOD TASK FORCE. THESE OPPOSED PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. WE DO NOT WANT THAT. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION AND YOUR INSTRUCTIONS ARE TO VOTE FOR THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF THEIR SIZE AND THE TOD ZONING. PRESENTLY, THE PROPOSED TO OD ZONING WOULD APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN EXCESS OF ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCREASE, THIS WOULD, UH, CAUSE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS SUCH AS MONTE VISTA. THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST THAT IS WITH CAPITAL LETTERS EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED LOTS REGARDLESS OF THEIR SIZE. FURTHERMORE, SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL. MY NAME IS MARYANNE WIG. I LIVE AT 2 1 5 IN CROWN HILL PARK, I'M SURE I LIVE AT 2 1 5 DOWNS SHIRE IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAPS WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS. MANY WOULD RENT OF LESS THAN $799 [01:15:02] PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDEN VILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST SPORTING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY, MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES FACING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TEXT DOCKS CLOSURES OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE WAY TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARY BE MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT IZA WEST OF LA PLAZA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION. NORTH SHOPPING CENTER BY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 569-4276. THANK YOU. EDMOND WICK AND I LIVE AT TWO 15 DO CHI IN CROWN HILL PARK. MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS TWO TEN FIVE ONE SEVEN NINE SEVEN FIVE EIGHT. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR BOUNDARY ROAD, UH, MAP WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS. MANY WOULD RINSE OF LESS THAN 799 PER MONTH. THIS INCLUDES A 42 BED TYPE, A ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND SUNRISE GARDEN DILLAS, WHICH IS THE LARGEST BOARDING HOME IN SAN ANTONIO. ADDITIONALLY, HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES PHASE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TECH STOCK CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND TRAFFIC THAT WILL RESOLVE RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. SO WHILE A NEIGHBORHOOD APPEARS TO BE SLATED TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY HOUSING, WE WON'T EVEN HAVE A SAFE PLACE TO ACCESS THE NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT MAP BOUNDARIES BE MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AT ISM WEST OF LA PA DEL NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PAVILION'S NORTH SHOPPING CENTER. THANK YOU. HI, THIS IS ROGER CHETO AND THESE COMMENTS ARE REGARDING ITEM NUMBER TWO, THE PROPOSED TOD AMENDMENTS AFFECTING THE MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL DISTRICT. I MAY BE REACHED AT 2 1 0 8 0 5 0 8 4 6. MY WIFE LAURA, AND I ARE LUCKY ENOUGH TO LIVE IN WHAT WAS A LUCCHESE FAMILY HOUSE AT 1 26 EAST LONGWOOD. WE AND MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS FEEL THAT IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO PRESERVE THESE HOUSES WITH THEIR DEEP CONNECTIONS TO SAN ANTONIO'S HISTORY. NOWHERE ELSE. IN SA WE FIND SO MANY MISS PERIOD, SO WELL PRESERVED. OURS AND A GREAT MANY OTHERS ARE COTTAGES, NOT MANSIONS INHABITED BY MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES. MY PLEA IS TO NOT DEGRADE WHAT MAKES THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SO SIGNIFICANT. SPECIFICALLY, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT ADDING HIGH DENSITY HOUSING AND MAKING IT EASIER TO CONVERT THESE RESIDENCES INTO COMMERCIAL VENTURES, WHICH WOULD FURTHER ENCOURAGE THE STRINGS OF CARS FLEEING THE POTENTIAL NEW CONGESTION ON SAN PEDRO. IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS ABOUT WHAT I SAY, PLEASE STROLL LOW WOOD OR THE OTHER STREETS OF MONTE VISTA. YOU'LL FIND THAT EVERY HOUSE IS DIFFERENT FULL OF CHARACTER AND IN A NEIGHBORHOOD WELL WORTH DESERVING. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS STEVE STEIG, 1 0 5 RENO STREET. I'M A BOARD MEMBER OF GOVERNMENT HILL TOMORROW AND A TIER ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION HEARING COMMITTEE MEMBER. I'M CALLING WITH MY COMMENTS ON THE TODD AMEN. URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY GATES AND DEED RESTRICTIONS. THE USE OF STATE ZONING LAWS ARE WHAT PROTECTS INVASIVE DEVELOPMENT [01:20:01] INTO SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS LIKE MINE AND MANY OTHERS. INSIDE LOOP FOUR 10. ENCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT THAT PROMOTES PUBLIC TRANSIT USE IS AN UNDERSTANDABLE GOAL. I THINK WE NEED TO REMEMBER THAT MOST HARDWORKING URBAN FAMILIES HAVE BUSY LIVES WITH CHILDREN AND PAYING BILLS. WHILE THE CITY HAS MADE GREAT EFFORTS TO GET INPUT ON THE TODD, IT HAS BEEN A FRACTION OF WHAT THE PUBLIC THINKS ABOUT THIS. OUR UDC CAN BE CHANGED IN JUST THREE YEARS, AND THEN IN FIVE YEARS AGAIN, DO WE WANT TO DO HARM TO SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND THEN SAY, EIGHT YEARS FROM NOW, OOPS. IF THE TODD DISTRICT NEEDS TO ALLOW MORE, WE CAN ADD THAT AT A LATER DATE. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TODD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TODD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TODD. THE SIZE RESTRICTION CAN BE EASILY CIRCUMVENTED BY BUYING MULTIPLY PROPERTIES AND REPL INTO ONE LARGER SINGLE FAMILY. ZONING WITHIN THE TODD MAP CAN STILL BE CHANGED BY THE STANDARD ZONING PROCESS. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TODD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. ALCOHOL USES CAN STILL BE ZONED BY THE STANDARD ZONING PROCESS. THE TODD IS CREATING GREAT AMOUNT OF OPPORTUNITY ALREADY WITHOUT INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY AND ALCOHOL, WE CAN AT LEAST WAIT. WADE. GOOD EVENING. UH, I AM FOLLOWING WITH COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENT. UH, MY NAME IS LYNN BOYD THIRD, AND I RESIDE AT 1 4 3 EAST AGARITA AVENUE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 2. I CURRENTLY SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF MONTE VISTA, HISTORIC ASSOCIATION FOR 2024. UM, I WELCOME DEVELOPMENT THAT BRINGS NEW RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. MY DESIRE AND HOPE IS THAT ANY REVISED TOD CODE REMAINS SENSITIVE TO THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THIS HISTORIC DISTRICT. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING, PROPOSED TO OD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. I ALSO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION F REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER AND I LOOK FORWARD TO A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SIMA COLVIN ON BEHALF OF THE BEACON HILL AREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOARD AND ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE REGARDING THE PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENTS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS, THE BEACON HILL AREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOARD, AND THE ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE SUPPORT AN EQUITABLE TODD FRAMEWORK BASED ON PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY, PUBLIC INPUT, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND RESPECT FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. WE HAVE SUPPORTED A TRANSPORTATION PLAN SINCE 2001 AND ADOPTED IT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN FOR FREDERICKSBURG ROAD. WE HAVE SUPPORTED THE CURRENT TODD, BUT REQUEST SOME MODIFICATIONS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE MORE DENSITY ALONG OUR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS AND AT THE SAME TIME SUSTAIN A STABLE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY. WE BELIEVE THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL HELP MITIGATE DISPLACEMENT THAT CAN OFTEN HAPPEN IN EVEN THE MOST WELL-INTENTIONED DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AS WELL AS CREATE MORE NEIGHBORS AND LOCAL BUSINESSES ALONG OUR CORRIDOR. THE BEACON HILL AREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOARD AND ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE ASK THAT THE REVISED UDC TODD AMENDMENTS NUMBER ONE EXEMPT ALL RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF LOT SIZE OR USE FROM THE TODD DISTRICT TWO ADOPT THE CUSTOMIZED BOUNDARY MAPS APPROVED BY THE TODD TASK FORCE AND AS SHOWN ON SA UP AND THREE REQUIRE A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TODD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THE BEACON HILL AREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOARD WELCOMES DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BRING NEW NEIGHBORS AND BUSINESSES TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT WANTS TO ENSURE THE INTRODUCTION OF [01:25:01] ANY NEW UTAH DISTRICT IS SENSITIVE TOWARDS POTENTIAL DISPLACEMENT OF RESIDENTS AND THE ALREADY BUILT ENVIRONMENT. AND I'M A PROPERTY OWNER IN THE CROWN HILL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD JUST NORTH OF NORTH STAR MALL, AND I SERVE AS THE VICE PRESIDENT OF ITS LONGSTANDING NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. I'M SUBMITTING COMMENTS FOR THE RECORD REGARDING THE TOD PLAN. IT'S ARGUABLE THAT NO NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE AGGRESSIVE TOD EXPERIMENT MORE THAN CROWN HILL PARK BECAUSE THE PROPOSED MAP ADJOINS OUR COMMUNITY ON THREE SIDES. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WAS LEFT COMPLETELY IN THE DARK IN THIS DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES. OUR FIRST OFFICIAL MEETING WITH CAT HERNANDEZ WAS JUST YESTERDAY. FAIRNESS WOULD DICTATE THAT THE MOMENT CITY LEADERS REALIZE THAT THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ITS THOUGHT WOULD PREDOMINANTLY BE BUILT NORTH OF FOUR 10 A SEAT AT THE TABLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE TO GIVE CROWN HILL PARK RESIDENTS A VOICE. THERE ARE ONLY TWO AFFECTED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NORTH OF FOUR 10 IN THIS AREA, AND NEITHER WAS PROPERLY ENGAGED IF AT ALL. OUR RESIDENTS ARE NOT NIMBY OBSTRUCTIONISTS. WE FULLY UNDERSTAND THE NEED FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN SAN ANTONIO, BUT WE ARE RIGHTFULLY CONCERNED WHAT THIS PLAN, WHICH QUITE LITERALLY SURROUNDS US TO DO TO HUNDREDS OF FINANCIAL NEST EGGS AND OUR COLLECTIVE QUALITY OF LIFE TWEAKING THE PROPOSED MAP TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE BUFFER FOR CROWN HILL PARK IS BOTH FEASIBLE AND WOULD NOT STYMIE THE CITY'S ULTIMATE GOAL. REDUCING THE THREAT OF ENCROACHMENT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, AND I ASK THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AWARDED A VOICE TO SPEAK UP ON BEHALF OF US. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. HELLO, MY NAME IS CHENBO. I LIVE AT 1 2 3 WEST MUL MULBERRY. I'M CALLING, UM, REGARDING COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. UM, I DO, YOU KNOW, SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ANY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE. UM, AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AS MUCH, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT INPUT INTO REZONING IN THE FUTURE FOR USE OF ALCOHOL OR, OR REALLY ANYTHING SUCH AS THAT. UM, MY BIG ISSUE IS THAT WITH THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN MONTE VISTA HISTORIC ASSOCIATION, WE'RE LIMITED IN WHERE WE COULD DO, UH, TO PROTECT OUR FAMILIES AND OUR PROPERTY. FROM THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION, UH, MULBERRY'S A VERY BUSINESS ROAD, UM, TRAFFIC COMBING MEASURES ARE NOT GONNA LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CARS, THE DESIGNATED BUS LANE'S GONNA BE DECREASE THE CAPACITY OF SOME PITCH OR HALF, UM, THAT TRAFFIC'S GONNA FLOW INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WOULD LIKE SOME KIND OF CONCESSIONS, UM, FROM THE CITY AND THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION THAT ALLOW ME TO FENCE MY PROPERTY OR DO THINGS TO WHERE MY FRONT YARD CAN BE, UM, USABLE TO ME AND MY FAMILY, AND ALSO TO HELP WITH THE AMOUNT OF NOISE THAT'S GONNA INCREASE AS WELL. IT'S ALREADY A VERY BUSY STREET AND, AND THIS WILL REALLY CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE POINT WHERE I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY THE OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION OF THE MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION SHOULD EVEN EXIST AT THIS POINT. UM, THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S CHANGING THE THE, THIS SHOULDN'T APPLY TO THEM ANYMORE. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS DIA COLE. I LIVE AT 1 0 5 RENO STREET. I'M CALLING WITH COMMENTS ON THE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. UH, FIRST OFF, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. SECONDLY, I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN HALF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. AND LASTLY, A SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICT. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AND OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION. UH, MY NAME IS ROSS LAWHEAD. I LIVE AT 59 75 LOCKHILL ROAD, SAN ANTONIO, SEVEN EIGHT TWO FOUR ZERO. MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (210) 859-2202. I LEAVE MY COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED [01:30:01] TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILIES OWNED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTIES ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION S REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ASK ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. I OFFER THESE COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF MYSELF AND THE OAKLAND ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FOR WHOM I SERVE AS LAND USE ATTORNEY. THANK YOU. YES, THIS IS MICKEY CONRAD. I LIVE AT THREE 10 MADISON. MY PHONE NUMBER IS TWO TEN SIX THREE NINE ONE THREE THREE NINE. I'M CALLING REGARDS TO THE UH, POD ZONING DRAFT AND I WANT TO VOICE MY OPPOSITION TO THE ELIMINATION OF MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR TOD DASH MX AND TOD DASH HI. THERE SHOULD BE SOME MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND NOT RELY ON THE MARKET TO DETERMINE PARKING SPACES. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS LUCY WILSON. I LIVE AT ONE 30 MAGNOLIA DRIVE, SAN ANTONIO SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. UH, MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (210) 913-4794. AND THESE ARE MY COMMENTS ON THE POD AMENDMENT. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED POD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FOR POD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN ONE HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENTS IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL OR AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN POD DISTRICTS. UH, SUCH AN AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. HELLO, MY NAME IS NOMA HOFFMAN. I LIVE AT 30 11 WHITE HILL DRIVE. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 430-4536 AND I AM CALLING TO COMMENT ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON SA SPEAKUP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN HALF OF AN ACRE, WHICH WILL INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. I ALSO SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION SS REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. THIS SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION WILL ALLOW THE NEIGHBORHOODS TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. PLEASE RESPECT OUR SAN ANTONIO TAX PAYING CITIZENS WHO PAY FOR CITY PROJECTS AND ALSO FOR YOUR SALARIES. THANK YOU. YES. MY NAME IS JOHN OF THE KING WILLIAMS ASSOCIATION. THE ADDRESS IS 1 22 MADISON STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SEVEN EIGHT TWO ZERO FOUR. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 601-7792. AND THIS CALL IS IN REFERENCE TO, UH, THE PLANNING AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER TWO FOR THIS AFTERNOON'S MEETING, I KIND THE REVISED U-D-C-T-O-D DOCUMENT AMENDMENTS EXCLUDE ALL RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF LOT SIZE OR USE FROM TOD OVERLAY AND EMPHASIZE AND APPRECIATE THERE IS EXISTING OF RESIDENTIAL [01:35:01] USE PROPERTIES. ENABLE PROPERTY OWNERS THE ABILITY TO OPT OUT OF TOD DISTRICT REZONING, ADOPT THE CUSTOMIZED BOUNDARY MAPS PRESENTED BY THE TOD TASK FORCE SUBCOMMITTEE WITHOUT EXPANSION OR ENCROACHMENT, INCORPORATE AND AGGRESSIVELY IMPLEMENT LIFE AND SAFETY PROVISIONS WITH RESPECT TO PARKING, TRAFFIC, INGRESS, EGRESS LIGHTING, SIGNAGE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. AND FINALLY, USING TOD REFERENCE MATERIAL, THERE MUST BE SENSITIVITY TO POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUES, ESPECIALLY SECURITY NOISE AND PARKING CONGESTION, RECOGNIZING THAT CURRENT EFFORTS ARE INADEQUATE. THE TOD IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE DENSITY AND INTENSITY AND MUST NOT COMPOUND EXISTING PROBLEMS. TOD IMPLEMENTATION SHOULD BRING FORWARD REMEDIES TO THESE LONGSTANDING FRICTIONS. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER INPUT. A WRITTEN STATEMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. THANK YOU. THIS IS DEBORAH JANE WARREN MEYERS. MY ADDRESS IS 1 0 8 WEST MARIOSA SAN ANTONIO SEVEN EIGHT TWO ONE TWO. MY TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (210) 240-0742. I AM CALLING ABOUT THE UM, TINC STEERING COMMITTEE, UM, REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION ISSUE. UM, I'M SORRY, I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER. UM, THIS, THIS IS REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION ISSUE OF PUTTING AN EXPRESS BUS, UM, THROUGH SAN PEDRO AVENUE TO THE AIRPORT. UM, MY UNDERSTANDING IS I'M SUPPOSED TO SHARE THESE COMMENTS WITH YOU. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS CURRENTLY ON ESSAY SPEAK UP AND AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. THE I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD. CURRENTLY, TOD DISTRICTS CAN BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GREATER THAN A HALF AN ACRE, WHICH WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA, WHICH IS MY NEIGHBORHOOD. I SUPPORT APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND PODA SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. MY NAME IS REBECCA SIMMONS. I'M AT 2 4 1 WEST LINWOOD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. I'M CALLING TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THE TODD AMENDMENT. UM, I SUPPORT BASICALLY THE APPROVAL BY A CAA TODD TASK FORCE OF THE PROPOSED MAP THAT PROTECTS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TODD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM POD ZONING. CURRENTLY THE PROPOSED POD ZONING CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN ONE QUARTER OR ONE HALF OF AN ACRE. WE LIVE IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. MANY OF THE BIG HOMES ARE ON MORE THAN A HALF ACRE LOT. I ABSOLUTELY DISAGREE WITH DOING ANY REZONING OF THE INTERIOR OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED TODD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. I ALSO DISAGREE WITH ALLOWING DEVELOPERS TO DEVELOP WITHIN THE DISTRICT WITHOUT PROVIDING PARKING FOR RESIDENTS THAT IS, UH, UNFAIR TO RESIDENTS AND UNFAIR TO THOSE WHO CURRENTLY LIVE IN MONTE VISTA. THANK YOU. NAME IS CYNTHIA WALKER. I LIVE AT TEN THIRTY EIGHT WEST SUMMIT AVENUE. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (818) 489-2599. I WANTED TO ADD MY COMMENTS ON THET OD AMENDMENTS. UM, I APPROVE THE TOD BOUNDARY MAPS ON THE ESSAY SPEAKUP WEBSITE, BUT I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY OWNED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE. I FEEL THE CITY MUST VALUE ITS OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS AND RESIDENTS WHO HAVE BEEN IN THEIR HOMES A LONG TIME, PARTICULARLY IF DISPLACEMENT IS NOT THE GOAL OF THE TOD PROGRAM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [01:40:01] YES. MY NAME IS JEFF HUNT. I REPRESENT ROOSEVELT PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. MY NUMBER IS 2 1 0 3 8 7 7 9 1 9. I AM CALLING IN REGARDS, UM, AND IN SUPPORT OF MY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IN ROOSEVELT PARK FOR THE TOD AMENDMENTS AND THE COMMITTEE'S WORK ON THE ZONING SPECIFICS. UM, WE ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR AS WE ARE THE FIRST NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, THAT WILL BE, UM, HAVE THE BUS STOPS FOR THE GREEN LINE. ALSO THE FIRST IN LINE FOR MANY TOD IMPROVEMENTS. WE ARE IN FULLY SUPPORT OF OF THE DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF THE, UM, HALF ACRE OR LESS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES. UM, AND WE BELIEVE THAT THIS PROJECT IS SO IMPORTANT FOR POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, ALSO FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR SO MANY OF OUR CITIZENS. AND OF COURSE MOVING FORWARD FOR A FUTURE WITH LESS DEPENDENCE ON CARS, UM, A BETTER FORM OF TRANSPORTATION, LESS PARKING LOTS AND LESS POLLUTION. UM, WE ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF AS IS THE AMENDMENTS AND WHAT THE COMMITTEE CREATED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HI, MY NAME'S CHERYL DOZIER AND I OWN A PROPERTY AT THE 4 2 4 FULTON AVENUE, ALONG WITH MY PARTNER. UH, OUR, MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 632-8512. I'M CALLING IN REFERENCE TO THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND I WASN'T SAY OVERALL, I, UH, SUPPORT THE CONCEPT. IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. HOWEVER, I DO NOT SUPPORT INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES IN THE, UH, INITIAL BOUNDARY MAP AND I DEFINITELY DO NOT SUPPORT AUTOMATIC APPROVAL OF VENUES THAT TO SERVE ALCOHOL AND PROVIDE LIVE MUSIC. WE ALREADY HAVE A SITUATION IN ALTA VISTA WHERE SOME OF THOSE VENUES BACK UP ONTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND THEY DO CREATE A PROBLEM SIMILAR TO WHAT IS BEING EXPERIENCED ON, UH, ALONG, UH, ST. MARY'S. SO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE AN INPUT. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. OH, THIS IS COMMENTS ON THE TOD AMENDMENTS. MY NAME IS SANDRA BAILEY. I LIVE AT 9 1 0 2 REGAL STREET IN CROWN HILL PARK. MY PHONE NUMBER IS (210) 422-2728. I'M OPPOSED TO THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP AS IT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF LOOP FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THIS MAP WITHIN A HALF MILE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE ARE ALREADY OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS OF LESS THAN $799 PER MONTH. ADDITIONAL HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES. THIS INCLUDES TDOT'S CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE BAT BOUNDARY BE MOVED NORTH OF WOLF ROAD AT ISEN WEST OF WA PLAZA DEL NORTE AND SOUTH OF LOOP FOUR 10 ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. HELLO, MY NAME IS PAM NIA AND I LIVE AT 91 0 2 REGAL IN CROWN HILL PARK. I OPPOSE THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR. BOUNDARY MAP IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED. THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO EXCLUDED OUR NEIGHBORHOOD NORTH OF LUKE FOUR 10 AS STAKEHOLDERS IN THE TOD TASK FORCE. AS SUCH, WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE CREATION OF THE MAP WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE ARE OVER 1200 SUBSIDIZED OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, MANY WITH RENTS OF LESS THAN $799 PER MONTH. ADDITIONALLY, HIGH DENSITY AND DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS INCLUDES TDOT'S CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLAH STREET BRIDGE TO OUTBOUND AND INBOUND NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE MAP BOUNDARY BE MOVED NORTH TO WOLF ROAD AND ISO AND WEST OF PLAZA, DALE NORTE AND SOUTH OF ROUTE FOUR 10 ADJACENT TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. HELLO, IT'S MELISSA SENDAL CALLING WITH THE LAVACCA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION [01:45:01] FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE HEARING TODAY. ITEM NUMBER TWO, BRIEFING AND ACTION ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 35 UDC FOR THE SECTION ON TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE LAKA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT OF TRUE NODAL TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING NEEDS MET ONE, CREATE A SAFE AND DESIRABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENT THAT NEEDS UNIVERSAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. WE URGE THAT THE ELEMENTS THAT MEET THESE STANDARDS BE PLANNED AND BUDGETED FOR AS PART OF TOD AND IMPLEMENTED UPON ADOPTION OF THE TOD AMENDMENTS TO PROTECT OUR SCHOOL CHILDREN BY MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE LOCAL SCHOOLS ALONG THE RAPID TRANSIT ROUTE AND ENHANCING ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SCHOOLS THREE SMARTLY ADDRESS PARKING BY ACCOUNTING REALISTICALLY FOR THE NEEDS OF A DA ACCESSIBILITY SCHOOL OPERATIONS, RESIDENTIAL PARKING NEEDS, EMERGENCY ACCESS AND PRESERVATION OF NARROW HISTORIC STREETS. THE L AND A SUPPORTS THE PROPOSED CUSTOMIZED BOUNDARY MAP WITH ESTABLISHED EDCS FOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND NCDS REMAINING IN PLACE. THE L AND A SUPPORTS THE PROPOSED DESIGNATIONS FOR ALCOHOL USE OF S SPECIFIC USES FOR TOD MX AND BLANK PROHIBITED USES FOR T-O-D-T-R AS INDICATED ON TABLE 3 42 0.02 DASH THREE TO SECURE THE TOD GOAL FOR VIBRANT COMMUNITIES AROUND ITS HUBS AND QUARTERS. THE LNA RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS A FOLLOWING UPON ADOPTION OF THESE TOD CODE AMENDMENTS, THE PROPOSED BUS SCHEDULE TO LATE NIGHT BUSINESSES. THIS MEANS 24 HOUR OPERATIONS TO SERVE BOTH PATRONS AND EMPLOYEES OF THESE BUSINESSES. BRING ALL SIDEWALKS, CROSSWALKS, AND BIKE LANES IN THE IMMEDIATE RAPID TRANSIT LINE COMMUNITIES UP TO UNIVERSAL DESIGN GUIDELINES WITH THE ADOPTION OF TOD AND LA VACA. THIS MEANS EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN SOUTH ST. MARY STREET AND I 37 SUPPORT WIDESPREAD APPLICATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM IN THE LEVO NEIGHBORHOOD WITH NEIGHBORHOOD BUY-IN FOR IDENTIFIED BLOCKS. FIRST TO SECURE RESIDENTIAL PARKING NEEDS AND ENCOURAGE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP FROM OUTSIDE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND PLEASE COMPLETE A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. THAT CONCLUDES THE VOICEMAILS THAT WERE RECEIVED. WE ALSO HAVE 32 PEOPLE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. OKAY. UM, JUST A LITTLE BIT OF HOUSEKEEPING. UH, ASHLEY FAIRMAN LEFT THE MEETING AT TWO 15 AND YAMINI NDA CARD JOINED THE MEETING AT 2 42. GOT IT. THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON. WE'LL KEEP GOING WITH THE PUBLIC COMMENT. CHAIRMAN. UH, DO WE WANT TO TAKE A LITTLE PAUSE IN THIS? 'CAUSE WE'VE BEEN AT IT FOR ALMOST TWO HOURS? SURE. WE CAN TAKE A 10 MINUTE BREAK. WE WILL RESUME AT FIVE. FIVE. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL RESUME AT 2 53. ALL RIGHT, EVERYBODY, LET'S GET GOING. EVERYBODY, PLEASE. BACK TO YOUR SEATS. WE'RE GONNA RESUME THE MEETING. ALL RIGHTY. EVERYBODY BACK TO YOUR SEATS. MR. HANLEY . SORRY BOSS. IT'S ALWAYS THAT. ALL RIGHT, LET'S GET GOING WITH PUBLIC COMMENT, I GUESS. STAFF, YOU HAVE THE SIGNUP SHEET, RIGHT? YES, CHAIR. WE DO. LITH. NEGLEY. THERE YOU GO. IS THAT ENOUGH? THANK GOODNESS. WE'RE AWAKE AGAIN. HELLO, MY NAME IS LITH NEGLEY, MY HUSBAND RICHARD NEGLEY AND I LIVE IN MONTE VISTA AT THE CORNER OF LINWOOD IN SAN PEDRO. IN A HUNDRED YEAR OLD SPANISH STYLE HOME BUILT BY CHARLES BAMBERGER, THE HOME SITS ON ONE ACRE. MR. BAMBERGER WAS THE PRESIDENT OF THE PORTLAND ALAMO CEMENT COMPANY, WHICH STILL EXISTS TODAY AT 1604. YOU MAY NOT KNOW OF IT, BUT EVERYBODY KNOWS THE SUNKEN GARDENS AND THE QUARRY SHOPPING CENTER, BOTH OF WHICH WERE THE ORIGINAL QUARRIES. WHAT YOU ALSO MAY NOT KNOW IS THAT MR. BAMBERGER DIED CHILDLESS AND LEFT ALL OF HIS MONEY TO THE CHILDREN OF SAN ANTONIO. ANY HIGH SCHOOLER MAKING A'S AND B'S ATTENDING COLLEGE IN THE ARTS AND SCIENCES CAN APPLY FOR A $5,000 A YEAR STIPEND THROUGH HIS FOUNDATION. SO MR. BAMBERGER'S LEGACY LIVES ON IN THE FORM OF HIS BUSINESS, HIS GENEROSITY AND HIS HOME. AND PART OF WHAT MAKES THAT HOME UNIQUE ARE THE GROUNDS WHICH WE HAVE ALWAYS OPENED TO THE PUBLIC. AS AN EXAMPLE, TWO YEARS AGO DURING THE PANDEMIC, A GARDENING GROUP FROM WISCONSIN APPROACHED THE MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ASKING IF ANY OF THE HISTORIC HOUSES HAD INTERESTING GARDENS, AND WOULD THEY OPEN THEM TO THE VISITING SNOWBIRDS. WE HAPPILY AGREED THEY [01:50:01] HAD SUCH A GOOD TIME, THEY ASKED TO COME BACK THIS COMING SPRING. MY HUSBAND JOKINGLY SAID, WE MUST THROW A GOOD PARTY. YES, WE DO. BUT ALSO IT IS BECAUSE THE GROUNDS ARE WHAT MAKE THE HOUSE INTERESTING. I WOULD VENTURE TO SAY THEY DON'T HAVE INNER COURTYARDS, FOUNTAINS AND REFLECTING POOLS IN WISCONSIN. I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT, TODD, PLEASE INCLUDE ALL RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE IN ITS PLANS TO PROTECT FAMILY RESIDENCES, NOT JUST THOSE SITTING ON HALF AN ACRE OR LESS. MR. BAMBERGER HAS DONE A LOT FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND CONTINUES TO DO SO, SO PLEASE HONOR AND PROTECT HIS HOME AND ALL HOMES THAT SIT ON MORE THAN HALF AN ACRE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. NEXT WE HAVE AL ZAKI. I JUST WANNA CLARIFY WITH STAFF, WE WERE LEAVING IT AT TWO MINUTES, CORRECT? THANK YOU. THAT'S CORRECT. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS ALAZAR DKI. I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT OF THE CITY FOR OVER 25 YEARS. I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE MY SUPPORT FOR THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS REC AS RECOMMENDED BY CSUS TOD TASK FORCE. I FEEL THE PROPOSED MAPS WILL ASSIST IN PROTECTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. THE CURRENT TOD ZONING PROPOSED CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN HALF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THESE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. I BELIEVE THE PROPOSED TOD ZONING MUST EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE IN THE MATTER OF ALCOHOL USE AND TOD DISTRICTS. AND THEIR DESIGNATION NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED, WHICH WOULD ALLOW SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. IT ALLOWS THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE ZONING PROCESS. I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER. NEXT WE HAVE VICTORIA GARBIN, FOLLOWED BY KELLY WALLS. HEY, HEY, GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS VICTORIA GERMAN. UH, I SAT ON THE ON THE TASK FORCE, UH, AS AN ALTERNATE FOR MONTE VISTA, BUT I THINK WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO REALIZE IS THAT WE ALL WORKED TOGETHER. WE GOT ALL THE NEIGHBORHOODS TOGETHER WITH T ONE BECAUSE ORIGINALLY THIS WAS GREEN LINE AND, AND, AND THE SILVER LINE. AND WE ASKED, WE SAT DOWN AS ALL THESE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND SAID, WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO US? AND THESE THREE THINGS WERE REALLY IMPORTANT, THE FACT THAT WE CONSIDER RESIDENTIAL HOUSING. WE DON'T THROW PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR HOMES REGARDLESS OF THE WHERE THEY ARE IN THE CITY. WE HAVE AN ISSUE WITH ALCOHOL. WE NEED TO BE REALLY RESPECTFUL OF NEIGHBORHOODS TRYING TO PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES LIVING WITHIN THEM AT ALL HOURS OF DAY AND NIGHT. AND WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE CRAG THAT ORIGINAL 36 MILES OF THE CITY AND HOW, HOW INTENSIVE THE DEVELOPMENT IS ALREADY. SO WHETHER YOU'RE ON THE EAST SIDE, THE WEST SIDE, THE SOUTH SIDE, THE NORTH SIDE, WE CARE ABOUT RESIDENTIAL FAMILIES. WE DON'T WANNA DISPLACE ELDERLY, WE DON'T WANNA DISPLACE FAMILIES. WE CAN DEVELOP, THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM TO DEVELOP, BUT LET'S DO IT VERY INTENTIONALLY. AND LET'S ALSO CONSIDER ANY RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT, PROPERTY OF ANY SIZE, BECAUSE YOU CAN BUY UP SMALL LOTS, PUT 'EM TOGETHER AND PACKAGE THEM AND DEVELOP THEM. SO PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. THANK YOU. WE HAVE KELLY WALLS FOLLOWED BY DREA GARZA. AND AFTER THAT, TOM ARCHER. GOOD AFTERNOON. THE CROWN HILL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION STRONGLY OPPOSES THE APPROVAL OF THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR BOUNDARY MAP. WHILE THE CITY WORKED CLOSELY WITH MONTE VISTA TO CREATE GUARDRAILS TO PROTECT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD FROM HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT, THEY FAILED TO NOTIFY MULTIPLE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT A SUBCOMMITTEE WAS DRAFTING NEW TOD BOUNDARY MAPS. BY EXCLUDING NEIGHBORHOODS AS STAKEHOLDERS, THE CITY OPENS THE FLOODGATES TO DESTROY WORKING CLASS NEIGHBORHOODS WEST OF SAN PEDRO AND NORTH OF FOUR 10. ACCORDING TO RECENT NEWS ARTICLES, THE TOD CHANGES WILL PAVE THE WAY FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOODS TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF NEW HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT. OUR NEIGHBORHOODS FACE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHALLENGES. UNFORTUNATELY, THESE CHALLENGES CANNOT BE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN A TWO MINUTE PERIOD. HIGH CRIME SECTORS ALREADY EXIST ALONG [01:55:01] THE IOM CORRIDOR WITHIN HALF A MILE RADIUS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF ALL SAPD CALLS FOR ONE OF THOSE APARTMENT UNITS WITHIN THAT HALF MILE RADIUS. THERE ARE SIMILAR HIGH CRIME CORRIDORS ON SAN PEDRO, NORTH OF HILDER BROWN AND NORTH OF FOUR 10. IF THE CITY CANNOT REDUCE EXISTING CRIME NOW ADDING MORE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA WILL CREATE A NEW GOTHAM CITY TECH STOCKS CLOSURE OF THE MCCULLOUGH STREET BRIDGE WILL BE CATASTROPHIC FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. REMOVAL OF THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS ON THE ACCESS ROAD WILL RESULT IN PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD SPORTS COMPLEX AT RAMSEY AND JONES BERGER WILL FURTHER IMPACT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT THESE ISSUES WERE NEVER DISCUSSED DURING THE MAP DRAWING SESSIONS. EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED TD THAT TOO MUCH REVISIONS DESERVED EQUAL REPRESENTATION. THANK YOU. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS DREA GARZA. I LIVE IN THE MONTICELLO PARK, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD AREA, AND I SERVED AS AN ALTERNATE FOR DISTRICT SEVEN ON THE TOD TASK FORCE. AND I ALSO SERVED ON THE TOD SUBCOMMITTEE THAT WORKED ON THE MAPS THAT YOU WILL BE, UH, REVIEWING TODAY. I DID WANNA SAY THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENTS. UM, I'M NOT GONNA REPEAT MUCH OF WHAT YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD. I DO ECHO, UH, THE SUPPORT FOR THE CUSTOMIZED MAPS THAT THE SUBCOMMITTEE PRESENTED IN WHICH THE LARGER, UH, TOD TASK FORCE ALSO SUPPORTED. UM, BUT DO WANT TO, UM, POINT OUT THAT THERE HAVE BEEN A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE LACK OF REPRESENTATION, UH, THAT TOOK PLACE AS THE MAPS WERE BEING DEVELOPED. THE SUBCOMMITTEE DID CAREFULLY REVIEW ALL OF THE MAPS, BUT WE DO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WERE MANY NEIGHBORHOODS THAT DID NOT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE THEIR CONCERNS AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT. I DO ASK THAT YOU PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING POLICY LANGUAGE THAT SPECIFICALLY INITIATES, UH, PARKING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY TODD. RIGHT NOW, THE LANGUAGE DOES NEGATE MANY OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND WE DO NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS REMAIN ACCESSIBLE TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING THERE. FINALLY, I JUST DID WANNA TAKE, UH, A MOMENT TO NOTE THAT, UM, THE PROCESS ITSELF SEEMED RUSHED AT TIMES. THERE WERE, UH, THERE WERE, THERE WAS A LACK OF ROBUST ENGAGEMENT, UH, FROM ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE ACTUALLY IMPACTED ALONG THIS CORRIDOR. THIS IS A CITYWIDE POLICY, BUT THERE WASN'T CITYWIDE REPRESENTATION ON THE TASK FORCE. WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT AS WE'RE MOVING FORWARD, THE LANGUAGE THAT IS IN THE POLICY RIGHT NOW THAT MAKES SURE THAT THERE ARE A VARIETY OF STAKEHOLDERS, UH, STAYS A PART OF THE LANGUAGE TO ENSURE THAT MOVING FORWARD, WE DO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MORE ROBUST ENGAGEMENT AND TRANSPARENCY IN THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE TOM ARCHER, FOLLOWED BY RICHARD NLY AND THEN CECILIA OTRO. HI, MY NAME'S TOM ARCHER. I AM, UH, I LIVE AT 1 51, UH, EAST LAW WOOD IN MONTE VISTA. I'M ALSO THE, UH, MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION'S INCOMING OR PRESIDENT-ELECT, UH, FOR 2025. I'D LIKE TO START, BY THE WAY, I'M NOT GONNA USE THE WORD HERO DESCRIBING YOU, BUT LISTENING TO ALL THOSE, UM, RECORDINGS IS HEROIC AND I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. I THINK THE ADAGE, UH, ABOUT IF ONE PERSON IS SAYING IT, THERE'S PROBABLY 20 PEOPLE THINKING IT. SO, UH, THE FACT THAT THERE WASN'T A LOT OF VARIETY IN THOSE MESSAGES PROBABLY GOES TO SHOW THAT THERE ARE SOME, SOME REAL HARD, UH, ISSUES THAT ARE CONCERNING PEOPLE RIGHT NOW. AND I'M NOT GONNA DISAPPOINT. UM, UH, BUT LET ME START BY SAYING THIS. I, I AM GLAD THAT WE'RE HERE TODAY. I'M GLAD I'M HERE TODAY. UM, I STRONGLY SUPPORT THE RAPID TRANSIT PROJECTS THAT, THAT ARE DRIVING TODAY'S DISCUSSIONS. I'M EXCITED AND SUPPORTIVE OF ALL YOUR EFFORTS TO MODERNIZE AND IMPROVE OUR CITY. I THINK THIS IS GONNA BENEFIT ALL OF US. WE JUST NEED TO DO IT RIGHT WITH THAT AS A BACKDROP. I'LL DO THREE QUICK POINTS, NOT SURPRISINGLY. FIRST, I URGE PTAC TO APPROVE THE, UH, TOD BOUNDARY MAPS THAT ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S TOD TAX TASK FORCE. THIS IS, THESE ARE GOOD FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, GOOD FOR NEIGHBORHOODS, AND GOOD FOR SAN ANTONIO. SECOND POINT IS THAT AS MUCH AS I SUPPORT THE, THE PROPOSED TOD MAPS, I DO HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE TOD ZONING PROVISION THAT STATES THAT ANYTHING, UH, ABOVE A HALF ACRE CAN BE, UM, CAN BE TREATED AT, IN A, IN WITH A TOD TREATMENT. AND I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S THE NECESSARY CALL OUT. UM, ALL, UM, I I BELIEVE ALL [02:00:01] SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIALLY ZONED LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE, SHOULD BE EXEMPT. AND THEN FINALLY, THE ALCOHOL ISSUE. IT'S IMPORTANT IN FACT, CRITICAL THAT, UH, THE P TAC APPROVES THAT CURRENTLY STANDING REQUIREMENT THAT ALL ALCOHOL USE IN TOD DISTRICTS REQUIRE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. THAT'S TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU. RICHARD NLY, FOLLOWED BY CECILIA OTRO AND RANDY OTRO. I AM RICHARD NAGLEY. I LIVE WITH MY WIFE LEAF, UH, ON THE CORNER OF SAN PEDRO. AND LINWOOD, A BEAUTIFUL HOUSE THAT SITS ON ABOUT AN ACRE. UH, MY FAMILY HAS LIVED OFF AND ON SAN PEDRO FOR MANY YEARS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD MAPS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY YOUR COMMITTEE TODAY. THESE MAPS WILL EXCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, UH, FROM BEING A PART OF THE TODI SUGGEST THAT THEY SHOULD MAKE THAT EXCLUSION COVER ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS REGARDLESS OF SIZE. THE AS TO THE LIQUOR, UM, I WOULD ALSO SUPPORT THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR, UH, COMMERCIAL USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICT. I ADDED COMMERCIAL USE BECAUSE I'M SURE, SURE, THERE'S SOME DRINKING THAT GOES ON THERE THAT I WOULD NOT OPPOSE. UH, AS YOU KNOW, THIS WILL ALLOW FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO COMMENT ON, UH, DANGER ISSUES OF SERVING COMMERCIALLY ALCOHOL IN AN AREA WHEN REZONING IS PROPOSED. THANK YOU. CECILIA OTRO, FOLLOWED BY RANDY OTRO. AFTER THAT, WE HAVE CYNTHIA SPIELMAN. HI, I AM CECILIA OTRO. I OWN THE BUILDING AT 3 4 2 WEST WOODLAWN, AND I ALSO OWN PROPERTIES IN ALTA VISTA AND MONTE VISTA. AND I LIVE AT 4 2 2 EAST ROSEWOOD. I HAVE LIVED HERE SINCE 1972. AND THIS VIA PROJECT, THE GREEN BUS LINE IS ALREADY OLD TECHNOLOGY. IT'S 1930S TECHNOLOGY. THERE ARE ROBOTAXIS AND ROBOT BUSES ALREADY OPERATING IN CITIES OF THE USA. BY THE TIME THEY GET THIS VIA PROJECT GOING, IT WILL BE OBSOLETE CHANGING THE ZONING, TAKING LAND AWAY FROM THE CITIZENS SELLING LIQUOR BY RIGHT. THIS IS, UH, THIS IS NOT RIGHT. TAKING DOWN TREES AND PUTTING EVERYTHING LIKE CONVERTING EVERYTHING TO LIKE A CEMENT VILLE CITY. THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE. THIS IS UNFORGIVABLE AND I OPPOSE THIS PROJECT. IT'S JUST OBSOLETE. WE DON'T NEED IT. AND, UH, IF YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE SIZE OF THESE TRANS ART STATIONS ARE, ENORMOUS, 50 BY EIGHT FEET. SOME OF THEM ARE EVEN LARGER. IT'S GONNA BRING IN A LOT OF CRIME AND CAR WRECKS AND SAFETY ISSUES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UH, CECILIA OTRO AND MY HUSBAND RANDY OTRO IS NOT GONNA BE HERE. HE ALREADY LEFT. THANK YOU. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS CYNTHIA SPIELMAN AND I CHAIR THE BEACON HILLS ZONING AND URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE, AS WELL AS A MEMBER OF TIER ONE STEERING COMMITTEE. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAD VARIOUS COMMITTEE, BOARD AND COMMUNITY MEETINGS ABOUT THIS TODD PLAN. WE WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT A MORE EFFICIENT AND USE USER-FRIENDLY TRANSPORTATION. WE ALSO SEEK TO STABILIZE OUR VERY DELICATE ECOSYSTEM. THAT'S AN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD. WE SEEK TO WELCOME NEWCOMERS, BUT ALSO WANT TO PROTECT LEGACY OWNERS, RENTERS AND VULNERABLE NEIGHBORS. WE'VE SEEN THE DESTABILIZATION REPEATEDLY DUE TO CITY DEVELOPMENT POLICIES. WE ASK THAT TODD, UM, IS A, THAT WILL BE ADOPTED ON THE FREDERICKSBURG CORRIDOR AS WELL AS EVERYWHERE ELSE THAT YOUR'RE CAREFUL NOT TO DISPLACE RESIDENTS THAT ARE LIVING IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY EXTENDING THE TOT INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. WE ALSO ASK THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S SO BADLY NEEDED FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. I LIVE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH I CAN WALK TO LOCAL BUSINESSES. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS I'M USUALLY WALKING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET, OFTEN WITH A STROLLER ALONGSIDE MY NEIGHBORS. WE DESPERATELY NEED SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES TO MAKE TODD WORK. LASTLY, AS TEMPERATURES CONTINUE TO RISE, WE THINK IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY THAT TREES ARE PLANTED WITH NEW DEVELOPMENTS. OUR CITY STREETS CREATE HEAT ISLANDS AND BEACON HILL HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE OFFICE OF SUSTAINABILITY AS WELL AS THE PARKS DEPARTMENT ON TREE PLANTINGS AND GIVEAWAYS THAT INCLUDE FOLLOW UP. THE CITY SHOULD FOLLOW SUIT. I KNOW THAT BIG DEVELOPMENT POLICIES SEEM LIKE AN EASY SOLUTION TO OUR TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS, BUT WE SHOULD LEARN FROM PAST MISTAKES AND CREATE THOUGHTFUL POLICIES THAT ARE GOOD FOR OUR COMMUNITIES ON DIFFERENT LEVELS AND THAT WORK FOR ALL [02:05:01] SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTS. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT TODD DOES NOT ENCROACH ON THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT BADLY NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROVIDED AND TREE PLANTINGS ARE REQUIRED ON NEW DEVELOPMENTS. THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE JILL TORBERT, FOLLOWED BY, FOLLOWED BY LETICIA SANCHEZ. AND AFTER THAT, OLIVIA CAR. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS JILL TORBERT. I LIVE AT 1 24 WEST GRAMERCY. MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE LIVED THERE FOR OVER 30 YEARS. DURING THOSE 30 YEARS, I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN VARIOUS ISSUES AND PROJECTS THAT HAVE PROTECTED AND ENHANCED OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND IN TURN, HELP SAN ANTONIO KEEP ITS UNIQUE CHARACTER I SUPPORT, AS HAS ALMOST EVERYBODY WHO HAS SPOKEN ON THIS ISSUE. THE CUSTOMIZED TODD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TODD TASK FORCE. I ALSO SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS NO MATTER THE SIZE OF THE LOT. I ALSO SUPPORT THE SPECIALIZED AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TODD DISTRICTS. I'VE BEEN QUITE CONCERNED ABOUT SERVING ALCOHOL IN ANY BUSINESSES THAT ARE, UM, ADOPT TODD THAT ARE SO CLOSE TO RESIDE THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. I'M ALSO VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE REDUCTION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN TODD. OUR STREETS ARE VERY NARROW IN MONTE VISTA. THEY ALREADY HAVE RESIDENTIAL PARKING ON THEM. AND TO INCREASE THAT BY HAVING A MINIMUM OR NO PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT IS JUST REALLY CREATING, UM, A BOTTLENECK IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. MAKES IT VERY UNSIGHTLY TO WALK AROUND THERE. AND IT ALSO CREATES A VERY LARGE SAFETY HAZARD. I'M HERE TO DELIVER A MESSAGE THAT THE CITY SHOULD PROTECT THE INNER CITY NEIGHBORHOODS FROM DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING USE AND DESIGN. CITY CODES SHOULD REFLECT THE UNIQUENESS OF SAN ANTONIO AND NOT BE A ONE SIZE FITS ALL. I TOO, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO THE CITY AND FOR LISTENING TO ALL OF US TODAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. LETICIA SANCHEZ. AFTER THAT, WE HAVE OLIVIA CRUZ, FOLLOWED BY ANGELINA VILLANUEVA. HI, MY NAME IS LETICIA SANCHEZ AND I'M THE CO-CHAIR PERSON OF THE HISTORIC WEST SIDE RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION. AND I ALSO REPRESENTED OUR ASSOCIATION ON THE TA TODD TASK FORCE. I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF OUR ASSOCIATION'S RESIDENTS WHO ARE VERY CONCERNED WITH THE IMPACT THAT THIS ZONING CODE WILL HAVE ON OUR COMMUNITY. THE SILVER LINE, WHICH IS THE SECOND A RT, UH, THAT V IS PROPOSING, WILL RUN THROUGH OUR COMMUNITY ON COMMERCE AND BUENA VISTA STREETS. OUR ASSOCIATION HAS MANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE RECOMMENDED ZONING, BUT EQUALLY AS IMPORTANT, WE HAVE ISSUES WITH THE PROCESS AND TIMELINE PUT FORTH BY THE CITY REGARDING THIS VERY IMPORTANT ZONING CODE. STUDY AFTER STUDY HAS SHOWN THAT TODD'S ZONING CODES THROUGHOUT THE US HAVE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED LOW INCOME AND MINORITY COMMUNITIES LEADING TO THE DISPLACEMENT OF RESIDENTS FROM THEIR COMMUNITIES. THAT'S THE COMMUNITY THAT I REPRESENT, UM, OUR CITY HAS. UH, BUT INSTEAD OF, UH, I'M SORRY. HOWEVER, INSTEAD OF DELVING INTO THE RESEARCH OF HOW COMMUNITIES HAVE BEEN NEGATIVELY IMPACTED AND TAKING TIME TO TRULY ENGAGE WITH COMMUNITY, OUR CITY HAS CHOSEN TO BORROW ZONING CODE AND TEXT FROM OTHER CITIES AND RUSH THROUGH THE PROCESS. THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE TODD ZONING CODE WAS PRESENTED TO THE TASK FORCE IN MARCH. THERE WAS NO MEETING IN APRIL, AND OUR LAST TASK FORCE MEETING WAS IN SEPTEMBER, WHICH MEANS THAT THIS TODD ZONING CODE WAS TO PUT TOGETHER IN SIX MONTHS. THERE'S NO REASON THAT THIS PROCESS HAD TO BE RUSHED AND THIS POLICY NEEDS TO BE ADOPT AND, AND SHOULD BE ADOPTED IN SUCH A SHORT TIMEFRAME. ADDITIONALLY, OUR ASSOCIATION FINDS THAT RESIDENTS VOICES AS USUAL ARE NOT GIVEN MORE IMPORTANCE OR WEIGHT THAN THE VOICES OF DEVELOPERS AND BUSINESSES. OF THE 26 MEMBER TASK FORCE, ONLY 13 MEMBERS REPRESENTED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. WHILE THE OTHER 13 MEMBERS, UH, WERE ATTORNEYS, [02:10:01] DEVELOPERS, REPRESENTATIVES FROM BUSINESSES. AND VIA. IT'S WRONG THAT THIS TASK FORCE DID NOT INCLUDE REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS THROUGHOUT THE GREEN LINE, UM, AND ALSO OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY WHERE ALL OF THIS TODD ZONING WILL RUN THROUGH. THAT'S TWO MINUTES FOR OUR RESIDENTS. YOU SAID THAT OLIVIA WAS THERE. OLIVIA? YEAH. OLIVIA CRUZ. OKAY. SHE'S GIVING HER TIME TO HER. FOR OUR RESIDENTS, THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES, REGARDLESS OF SIDE FROM SIZE FROM TODD IS CRUCIAL. OUR RESIDENTS ARE SOME OF THE POOREST RESIDENTS IN THE CITY AND ARE DESPERATELY TRYING TO KEEP THE PROPERTIES THAT THEY OWN. ALLOWING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES OVER HALF AN ACRE. TO BE TODD ZONE WOULD NOT ONLY INCENTIVIZE AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IN OUR RESIDENTIAL AREA, IT WOULD INCREASE PROPERTY TAXES OF OUR RESIDENTS, WHICH WOULD LEAD TO RESIDENTS BEING UNABLE TO AFFORD HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND ULTIMATELY THEM LOSING THEIR HOMES. OUR ASSOCIATION, OUR ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT OF THE BOUNDARY MAPS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED BY THE TASK FORCE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE AIRPORT TO RECTOR MAP MAP, WHICH SHOULD HAVE MORE INPUT BY THE CROWN HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. UH, OUR ASSOCIATION IS A, UM, WE ASK THAT, UH, I'M SORRY. OUR RESIDENTS ALSO WANT TO HAVE INPUT ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TAUGHT DISTRICTS AND ASK YOUR APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION OR AS REQUIREMENT IN TAUGHT DISTRICTS. AND FINALLY, THE ELIMINATION OF PARKING AND TODD DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS SHOULD BE ADDED BACK INTO THE CODE. UH, ALTHOUGH TODD'S GOAL IS TO ELIMINATE INDIVIDUAL CAR USE, OUR CURRENT VIA TRANSIT SYSTEM IS NOT UP TO PAR. SO PEOPLE WILL CONTINUE TO USE AUTOMOBILES TO TRAVEL UNTIL OUR TRANSIT SYSTEM CATCHES UP. IN THE MEANTIME, PEOPLE LIVING IN OR VISITING, UH, DEVELOPMENTS IN TODD DISTRICTS, UH, WILL CONTINUE TO DRIVE AND WILL THEN HAVE TO PARK IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH WILL CREATE ISSUES ALONG OUR RESIDENTIAL STREETS. WE'VE ALREADY EXPERIENCED IT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, WHERE A FOUR STORY APARTMENT, UH, COMPLEX WAS BUILT, UH, IN A SMALL RESIDENTIAL STREET ALONG A SMALL RESIDENTIAL STREET. AND WE HAVE PARKING ON BOTH SIDES AND YOU CANNOT HAVE, UH, THE, UH, E EMERGENCY VEHICLES COMING THROUGH WHILE YOU HAVE THE VIA TRANS GOING THROUGH. AND WE HAVE CHILDREN WALKING TO THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. SO, UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, ANGELINA, EVA. THEN WE HAVE CAMMI KENNEDY, FOLLOWED BY TONY GARCIA AND THEN MG ZOS. SO WE CAN GET TRANSLATION SERVICES OUT HERE, AH, THE TIME AND IN THE, IN GOOD AFTERNOON. AS FAR AS THE CHANGES AND THE MODERNIZATION OF TRANSPORTATION, OF TRANSPORTATION, UH, HAVE YOU BEEN, UM, ASKING YOUR FAMILIES, WHEN YOU START THE PLANNING OF A PROJECT, YOU DO IT TAKE IN CONSIDERATION YOUR FAMILIES OR PEOPLE THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR AREA, AND WHAT WOULD BE THE CONSEQUENCES, UH, WHEN THEY'RE DISPLACED BY YOU, WHEN YOU HAVE NOT, UM, CONSIDERED THEM IN YOUR GOALS. HAVE YOU PLANNED, UH, A RELOCATION, UM, PROCESS THAT'S CONVENIENT FOR THEM? HAVE YOU WORN THOSE, UH, FAMILIES, SHOES TO KNOW WHAT ARE THEIR NEEDS AND KNOW WHAT, HOW YOU WILL BE AFFECTING THEM? OF COURSE NOT. YOU'RE ONLY INTERESTED IN MAKING THE CHANGES TO MAKE THE CHANGES IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION [02:15:01] TO WHAT THE FAMILIES MIGHT BE NEEDING OR WHERE THEY WILL LIVE. JUST THINK OF THE FAMILY, THE WEST SIDE, THAT'S TWO MINUTES AND VERY VULNERABLE PEOPLE THEN, AND THEN YOU NEED TO CONSIDER THE COST. OKAY, THANK YOU. TONY GARCIA. HE'S GONNA HAVE A TOTAL OF FOUR MINUTES. GEMMA KENNEDY SEATED HER TIME. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS TONY GARCIA. I LIVE AT 2 43 EAST ATCH HERE IN SAN ANTONIO. I'M CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE FOR THE MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION. ALSO A MEMBER OF THE TIER ONE STEERING COMMITTEE AND ALSO SAT AT THE, UH, T CITY'S, UH, TOD TASK FORCE. WE WELCOME DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BRING NEW NEIGHBORS IN BUSINESSES TO MONTE VISTA. HOWEVER, WE WANT TO ENSURE THAT THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY REVISED TOD DISTRICT REMAINS SENSITIVE TO THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AND ALREADY BUILT ENVIRONMENT OF OUR HISTORIC DISTRICT. WE ALSO SUPPORT A MORE EQUITABLE, EQUITABLE APPROACH TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TODD FOR ALL NEIGHBORHOODS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED TOD, THE PROVISIONS IN THE TOD IS CITYWIDE, NOT JUST FOR MONTE VISTA DAVITA. THAT BEING SAID, WE REQUEST A PTAG TO APPROVE THE BOUNDARY MAPS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOD TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT CURRENT CITY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND PROMOTE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN APPROPRIATE AREAS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. CURRENTLY IN THE PROPOSED DRAFT, A TOD ZONING CAN BE APPLIED TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN HALF ONE HALF ACRE. WE BELIEVE THE DRAFT SHOULD BE REVISED SO THAT ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOTS, REGARDLESS OF SIZE, BE EXEMPT FROM TOD. THESE TOD MAPS COULD BE EXPANDED IN THE FUTURE UNDER A UDC AMENDMENT WITH AN ADVERSE EFFECT OF INCREASED DENSITY IN ALREADY DENSE AREAS AND INCENTIVIZING IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN THESE AREAS. ALWAYS RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHOULD HAVE EQUAL PROTECTION AND BE EXEMPT FROM TOD RESIDENTS IN SOUTH MONTE VISTA HAVE FELT THE IMPACT OF NORTH ST. MARY'S STRIP. WE BELIEVE THAT PTACS SHOULD APPROVE THE SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. REQUIRING A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR AN ALCOHOL REQUEST, ALLOWS A NEIGHBORHOOD TO VOICE AN OPINION ON LIFE SAFETY ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. OVERALL, WE SUPPORT THE PROPOSED TOD WITH THE ABOVE REQUESTED CONSIDERATIONS. WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH, , FOLLOWED BY RYAN REED. MS, I WON'T SPEAK YOUR NAMES. UM, JOY, 15 MINUTES. JOYCE IS GIVING, UM, HER TIME. SOCIAL. HAVE FOUR MINUTES. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS MARIA GUADALUPE JOHNSON CASOS, AKA LUPITA. I LEAD AT 92 0 2 RE RICO STREET, CROWN HILL PARK, TOD AMENDMENT. I OPPOSE DEFINITELY CROWN HILL PARK LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, WHICH NOW IT SEEMS THAT WE ALL, WITH ALL THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, OUR AREA WILL BECOME THE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, HONORABLE RON BERGER, COUNCILWOMAN DISTRICT ONE, DISTRICT FIVE, DISTRICT SEVEN, AND DISTRICT 10. AND WE DO RESPECT THE REST OF THE CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES, PLANNERS, ENGINEERS, DEVELOPERS, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE ELECTED TO REPRESENT ALL PARTIES THAT WILL BENEFIT GOVERNMENT, STATE AND CITY PLANNING. BUT MOST IMPORTANT, THE IMPACTS AND CHANGES THAT WILL AFFECT LOCAL RESIDENTS, CONSTITUENTS THAT RESIDE IN THE AREA. IT IS, [02:20:01] IT IS A REQUIREMENT BY ELECTED OFFICIALS TO INFORM CONSULTING BOARD, COLLABORATE, AND EMPOWER THROUGH HOA TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC BALANCE AND OBJECTIVE INFORMATION TO ASSIST THEM IN UNDERSTANDING HOW PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES, TRANSPORTATION CHANGES IN OUR SOLUTIONS. A FACT SHEET MAILING TO HOE PRESIDENT RESIDENTS ABOUT A SPECIFIC PLANT HOUSING PROJECT TO OBTAIN FEEDBACK ON ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVES AND OR AGENCY DECISIONS INFORMED, LISTEN AND ACKNOWLEDGE CONCERNS AND ASPIRATIONS AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON HOW PUBLIC INPUT INFLUENCED THE DECISION. THIS INCLUDES ASKING FOR INDIVIDUAL OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON HOUSING WORKSHOPS. INCLUDE THE COMMUNITY NON STAGES OF A ZONING OR HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TO ENSURE CONCERNS AND ASPIRATIONS ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CONSIDERED DELIBERATE POLLING PARTNER WITH PUBLIC IN EACH ASPECT OF THE HOUSING PLANNING PROCESS, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPMENTAL ALTERNATIVES AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PREFERRED SOLUTION PLACE. A FINAL DECISION MAKING IN THE HANDS OF THE PUBLIC. CROWN HILL PARK WAS NOT EXCLUDED YET. IT WILL AFFECT OUR COMMUNITY IN MANY ASPECTS. CRIME TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT. I HAVE WITNESSED BURGLARIES IN PROGRESS CAR ACCIDENTS, AND I WAS SUMMONED TO WITNESS ON TWO INDIVIDUALS THAT DID A HOME INVASION ON CORONA. THANKS TO GOD, THEY PLED. SO I DID NOT HAVE TO SHOW AND TESTIFY. THEY CAUGHT ONE, BUT THEY DID NOT CATCH THE OTHER ONE. ONE OF 'EM GOT A 20 YEAR SENTENCE BECAUSE HE HAD A, UH, ASSAULT WEAPON OFFENSE AGAINST HIM. THEY GAVE HIM 20 YEARS. SO WE TOOK ONE CRIMINAL OUT OF THE STREETS. MY CONCERN IS THAT WE ARE THE HEART OF SAN ANTONIO AND WE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. THERE'S 322 HOMES IN CROWN HILL. MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHEN I MOVED THERE WERE MILITARY RETIREES. MOST OF THEM WERE COLONELS. COLONELS IN THE MILITARY. NOW NEWCOMERS ARE COMING. YOUNG PEOPLE WITH CHILDREN, THEY PLAY ON THE STREETS. AND THEN WE HAVE THE TRAFFIC COMING THROUGH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THAT IS THE REASON THAT WE APPROACH MAYOR CISNEROS AND THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME, TO PLACE A FENCE NORTH OF CROWN HILL SUBDIVISION BECAUSE THERE WAS SOMEONE KILLED PLAYING ON THE STREETS. SO I AM ASKING THE PLANNERS, THE ENGINEERS, TO CONSIDER CROWN HILL IN THIS DECISION. WE ARE ALL ALONE THERE. YOU WANT TO MOVE? DO YOU WANNA MOVE THE DOWNTOWN AREA TO OUR AREA PRACTICALLY? BUT YOU ARE INVADING OUR CROWN HILL SUBDIVISION. THAT'S FORM. SO PLANNERS, PLEASE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OUR RESIDENTS AT CROWN HILL SUBDIVISION. NEXT WE HAVE RYAN REED. FOUR MINUTES, CLARA O'NEIL HAS SEATED OUR TIME. SANCHEZ FOLLOWED BY JEANETTE RELO. WHERE'S THE TIME? OKAY. AND MARIA, WHO'S IN BLUE, WAS GOING TO GIVE HER TIME TO ME AS WELL. BU MY NAME IS GRACIA SANCHEZ. I LIVE AT 27 18 MONTEREY ON THE SILVER LINE, AND I WORK AT 9 22 SAN PEDRO, THE ESPERANZA PEACE IN JUSTICE CENTER, WHICH WOULD BE ON THE SILVER LINE. UM, I'M HERE TO SAY I DON'T EVEN KNOW MUCH ABOUT WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON WITH TODD. I WANNA THANK LETICIA FROM THE HISTORIC WEST SIDE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION FOR KEEPING ME A LITTLE BIT ON TOP OF THIS . UM, BUT IT HAS BEEN FAST PACED AND I'M CONCERNED, UH, FOR THE ESPERANZA, WHICH HAS BEEN IN THIS BUILDING FOR 30 YEARS. UM, WE HAVE A CULTURAL ARTS ORGANIZATION WHERE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE COME ON A YEARLY BASIS INTO THAT SPACE. SO HOW DOES THE TODD AFFECT OUR COMMUNITY OF PEOPLE ATTENDING? WE LIVE [02:25:01] NEXT TO A LOT OF SENIOR HOUSING AND DISABLED PEOPLE'S HOUSING. POOR, POOR PEOPLE. HOW WILL THEY BE AFFECTED? WILL THEY BE DISPLACED? UM, I KNOW RIGHT NOW THIS BUILDING WAS BUILT IN 1907. IT'S HISTORIC AND JUST HAVING THE VIA BUSES STOP IN FRONT OF US OR NOW A BLOCK AWAY HAS HURT OUR BUILDING. THE STRUCTURES AGAIN, THAT'S BEEN AROUND OVER A HUNDRED YEARS. AND WE STARTED SEEING THE THE SIDEWALKS ARE ALWAYS CRACKED. PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS STRIPPING ON SAN PEDRO. UM, WE HAD TO FIGHT THE CITY TO GET MAJOR PIPES BUILT THERE SO THAT THE WATER WOULD COME DOWN BECAUSE IT WAS JUST FLOODING INTO OUR BUILDING AND AGAIN, MESSING UP OUR BUILDING INSIDE. AND, YOU KNOW, WHEN VIA PASSES BY , IT FLUSHES THAT WATER, PUSHES THAT WATER INTO OUR BUILDING. SO HOW, HOW DOES THIS AFFECT US IN THE FUTURE, UH, WITH THE EAST WEST? I MEAN, I LIVE ONE BLOCK SOUTH OF BUENA VISTA STREET, AND UP TILL JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO, ALL THOSE HOUSES, SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOMES BUILT IN THE NINE, YOU KNOW, 19 HUNDREDS TO 19 FIFTEENS WE'RE ALL, UH, ZONE MULTIFAMILY, 33 . SO, YOU KNOW, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? I MEAN, THANK GOODNESS WE FOUGHT AND PUSHED, BUT IT TOOK ALMOST TWO YEARS TO GET THOSE CHANGES HAPPENING, BUT WE'RE CONCERNED, UM, THAT IT STILL, I MEAN, WE WERE WORKING WITH, UH, FOLKS IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ALL OUR ZONING AND, AND LAND USE COLORS WERE PURPLE. AND IT'S LIKE, WHY AREN'T THEY YELLOW? BECAUSE WE'RE SINGLE RE YOU KNOW, WE'RE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. THE BIGGEST THING IS ALL, NOT THE BIGGEST THING. ANOTHER CONCERN IS THE DISPLACEMENT OF OUR COMMUNITIES. WE'RE SEEING THAT ALL THESE LITTLE CORNERS, YOU KNOW, WALGREENS JUST CLOSED DOWN. WILL THERE BE A FOUR STORY BUILDING THERE? UM, OUR AVERAGE INCOME IN THE WEST SIDE IS IN SEVEN EIGHT. 2 0 7 IS 25,000. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BUILD HOMES WHERE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE AT 60 AND $50,000 COME IN? THAT'S AN AUTOMATIC DISPLACEMENT OF OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE WE WON'T, YOU KNOW, OUR FOLKS WILL BE PUSHED OUT AND WE WON'T BE ABLE TO EVEN RENT FROM THOSE SPACES. UM, AND THE CONGESTION IS THE CONSTANT. UM, THE HAS COLORADO AND THE FOUR STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX WAS BUILT BY SAHA AND NRP. AND WE CHALLENGED AND WE, WE PLEADED THAT WE WANTED THE, WE WANTED HOUSING, BUT IT SHOULD BE HISTORICALLY RELEVANT. LOOK, AT LEAST TWO STORIES AND FOUR STORIES DIDN'T MAKE SENSE. WE TALKED ABOUT TRAFFIC, WE TALKED ABOUT ALL THE CHILDREN WHO GO TO JT AND, AND TAFOYA AND HOW THEY WERE GONNA BE AFFECTED AND THEIR MOTHERS AND, AND THE PARENTS WHO WALK THEIR CHILDREN THERE. IT HAS BEEN HORROR WOMEN WHO ARE PART OF OUR MU ARTES, UH, ORGANIZATION THAT HAVE DIABETES, THAT HAVE LOST THEIR FOOT, THAT ARE IN WHEELCHAIRS, DON'T EVEN HAVE THE CAPACITY TO HAVE VIA TRANS GO THERE BECAUSE AGAIN, PEOPLE ARE PARKED ON BOTH SIDES AND 18 WHEELERS COMING IN FROM, UH, ANOTHER PLACE ARE COMING THROUGH. SO IT'S, IT'S CRAZY, CRAZY CRAZY. AND I CAN'T IMAGINE IN THE WEST SIDE HOW WE'RE GONNA BE AFFECTED BECAUSE THOSE HOUSE, THOSE STREETS ARE SMALL. JUST GRACIA. THANK YOU NETTE RICO. AFTER THAT WE HAVE TONY MARIE VAN BURN, FOLLOWED BY ANN VAN PELTZ. HOW? HELLO? UM, MY NAME IS JEANETTE RICO AND I LIVE AT THE ALZA APACHE COURTS. I WANT TO ASK THAT THIS ZONING CODE INCLUDED PARKING AND DEVELOPMENTS THAT, UM, THAT ARE ALONG THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. I HAVE HAD SCARY SITUATIONS IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE FOUR STORY APARTMENTS, UM, WERE BUILT AND NOW MY WALK TO DROP OFF MY CHILDREN AT THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THAT IS JUST THREE BLOCKS FROM MY APARTMENT HAS BECOME VERY DANGEROUS. THIS IS BECAUSE NOW THERE ARE SO MANY CARS, UM, FROM RESIDENCE, UM, OF THIS APARTMENT COMPLEX PARKED ALONG OUR RESIDENTIAL STREETS AND THEY BLOCK OUR VIEW OF CARS VIA TRANSPORTATION AND SCHOOL BUSES AND 18 WHEELERS DRIVING DOWN THEIR STREETS. IT IS A MIRACLE THAT NO ONE HAS GOTTEN KILLED, BUT IT COULD HAPPEN IF PARKING IS NOT, UM, RES REQUIRED AND, UM, [02:30:01] AND TAUGHT DEVELOPMENTS IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, THE SAME MESS WILL HAPPEN. IT'S IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS. THANK YOU. TONY MARIE VAN BURN. HI. THANKS FOR HI. HEARING ALL OF US. UM, I COULD SAY DITTO AND, YOU KNOW, GIVE YOU SOME TIME BACK, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO. SO, UM, I'M TONY VAN BUREN. I AM THE IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE MONTE VISTA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION. UM, AND THIS HAS BEEN A HOT TOPIC WITH US. UM, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE ROOM, UM, I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE CUSTOMIZED TOD BOUNDARY MAPS AS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY COSTLESS TASK FORCE. THESE PROPOSED MAPS WILL PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM BECOMING TOD DISTRICTS. I SUPPORT THE EXCLUSION OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTIES REGARDLESS OF SIZE FROM TOD ZONING. CURRENTLY, THE PROPOSED TOD CAN APPLY TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GREATER THAN HALF AN ACRE. THIS WOULD INCENTIVIZE THE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. I SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF ALCOHOL IN TOD DISTRICTS. A SPECIAL AUTH AUTHORIZATION ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOODS TO VOICE AN OPINION IN THE SAFETY, UH, IN SAFETY AND LIFE RELATED ISSUES DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. SO THANK Y'ALL VERY MUCH, UM, FOR A LONG AFTERNOON. AND VAN PEL FOLLOWED BY REBECCA SIMMONS. REBECCA SIMMONS. I, MY NAME IS ANN VAN PELT. I LIVE IN, UH, MONTE VISTA AT 1 1 9 WEST ATCH. DO YOU HEAR THE PASSION? DO YOU HEAR THE PASSION FROM PEOPLE? YOU ALL HAVE SUCH A RESPONSIBILITY AND I'M SO PROUD TO LOOK YOU IN THE EYE AND SAY THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR SERVING. IT'S A BIG JOB TRYING TO MANAGE A CITY, TRYING TO REZONE, TRYING TO TAKE CARE OF EVERYBODY. THINK CAREFULLY, HEAR THE PASSION. I SUPPORT JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. THIS MAP. I THINK IT WAS WELL DONE. CLICK. UH, TONY, UH, MY GARCIA, MY GOOD FRIEND, WORKED REALLY HARD ON IT AND SO DID SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE. WE CANNOT EXCLUDE LOTS OVER AT HALF AN ACRE BECAUSE THEY ARE THE HEART OF MANY COMMUNITIES, NOT JUST MONTE VISTA. AND HAVING, UH, ALCOHOL BE A JUST AN AUTOMATIC IS NOT THE WAY ANY COMMUNITY SHOULD HAPPEN. ALCOHOL BRINGS LOTS OF PROBLEMS WITH IT. WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO IT. IT JUST HAS TO BE CAREFULLY DONE. BUT PARKING AND TRAFFIC ARE GOING TO AFFECT ALL OF US MORE THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE. TRAFFIC IN MONTE VISTA, IT HAS INCREASED ALREADY CLOSED DOWN ONE LANE EACH WAY ON SAN PEDRO BETWEEN, UM, HILDEBRAND AND ASHBY IS GOING TO AFFECT BOTH SIDES, NOT JUST MONTE VISTA, BUT ALL THE COMMUNITY ON THE OTHER SIDE. THIS IS BECOMING A, A, A RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR. WE'RE RUSHING TO AND GOING FROM, AND WE'RE NOT, I MEAN, I WATCH PEOPLE RUN STOP SIGNS. I WATCH PEOPLE ON HILDEBRAND RUN THAT TRAFFIC LIGHT. PLEASE CONSIDER TRAFFIC AND PLEASE CONSIDER PARKING. YOU CANNOT JUST SAY, LET THEM PARK ON THE STREET. I COME FROM THE NORTHEAST WHERE EVERYBODY HAD A PARKING PERMIT AND YOU COULDN'T PARK. OTHERWISE, YOU CAN'T JUST BUILD A BUILDING AND SAY THERE'S NO PARKING. THANK YOU SO MUCH AND HEAR THE PASSION. NEXT WE HAVE MARY JOHNSON, FOLLOWED BY JACK FINGER. HI, I AM MARY JOHNSON. I'M THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE MONTE VISTA TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT WE HAD NO REPRESENTATION ON THE TASK FORCE AS, UH, ALMOST PARK TERRACE DID NOT. CROWN HILL PARK, AS WE ALL HEARD, KING WILLIAM NORTH, CENTRAL NORTH, SHE HILLS, NORTHMORE, AND KENWOOD. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE MASS AREA REZONING THAT HAPPENED, UM, WHICH WOULD'VE CORRECTED INCOMPATIBLE ZONING WITHIN OUR RESIDE, WITHIN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AS IT WOULD'VE BEEN CONSIDERED SPOT ZONING. WE WERE TOLD, UM, MANY OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE THE SAME ISSUE. WE HAVE FOUR HOMES ON RIDGEWOOD, CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL USES ZONED OH TWO [02:35:01] AND TWO ON NORWOOD RESIDENTIAL USES AS WELL, AND THEY'RE ZONED IN MF 33. WE ALSO HAVE PART OF A, OF AN APARTMENT COMPLEX IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND ALL THOSE PROPERTIES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS TOD MAP. THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THOSE APARTMENTS WILL MOST CERTAINLY BE DISPLACED AS ALLURE FROM LUCRATIVE OFFERS TO CURRENT OWNERS FROM INVESTMENT GROUPS LOOKING TO PROFIT OFF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, SELL THE PROPERTIES THAT CURRENTLY OFFER AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS FOR THESE PEOPLE THAT ALREADY LIVE, WORK AND PLAY HERE. I WAS INVITED TO ONE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING AND SAW WHAT WAS HAPPENING. AS THE BOUNDARIES ARE BEING DRAWN, IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT THEY HAD NO CLUE OUR LITTLE NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL AS OTHERS ALONG THE CORRIDOR WHEN IT COMES TO, UH, RESIDENTIAL USES THAT ARE ON IMPROPERLY ZONED PROPERTIES. AND AS WE ALL HEARD, A LOT OF THE SAFETY ISSUES THAT WE KNOW BECAUSE WE KNOW OUR COMMUNITIES, UM, I THINK IT IS REPREHENSIBLE THAT SO MANY NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WE, THAT WILL BE MOSTLY DIRECT, MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE TOD HAD NO VOICE ON THIS TASK FORCE. WE ALL KNOW THAT AFTER THIS PASSES COUNCIL, THE CARVING OF OUR OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS, THE CARVING UP OF OUR OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAD NO SEAT ON THE TASK FORCE WILL COMMENCE BECAUSE THE TOD WILL BE USED AS A MEANS TO AN END. WE WILL NOT HAVE THE SAME RE RESOURCES THE INVESTMENT GROUPS HAVE OR THE TIME TO FIGHT FOR THE PLACES WE ALREADY LIVE, WORK, AND PLAN IN. THANK YOU. WELL, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, MY NAME IS JACK M. FINGER AND, UH, I TOOK A TAB HERE. I OVER 80 PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN EITHER ON PHONE OR IN PERSON, AND ONLY 3% OF THEM WERE WHOLEHEARTEDLY IN FAVOR OF THIS SITE. 3%. NOW, ADMITTEDLY, MOST OF THOSE CALLERS WHERE THEY WERE READING FROM A SCRIPT, I AS A PUBLIC SERVICE, I WILL NOT READ FROM A SCRIPT FOR YOU. DO YOU REALIZE WHAT A GIGANTIC CATASTROPHE YOU HAVE IN THE MAKING HERE? THE, YOU'VE HEARD ALL THE COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROBLEMS, THE PARKING, LACK OF REQUIREMENTS FOR IT, THE TRAFFIC THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN HERE, THE ALCOHOL ISSUE, ALL THESE THINGS. BUT NOW YOU, MOST OF YOU FOLKS HERE ON BEHIND THIS DIOCESE ARE AND FROM THE DEVELOPERS COMMUNITY, YES. YOU'RE GONNA SAY, WELL, WE, WE CAN SO THROW THE, THE RESIDENTS OF BONE AND WE WON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. NO. DON'T YOU REALIZE YOU ARE GOING TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS? HOW, WHY? BECAUSE YOUR CUSTOMERS ARE ON SAN PEDRO. THEY WILL GO OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEIR CUSTOMERS CANNOT GET TO THEM AND GIVE THEM MONEY SO THEY CAN GIVE MONEY TO YOU. YEAH. WHY? BECAUSE THE LOOK AT THE MAPS, THE BUSES, BUS LANES, YOU CAN'T GET ACROSS SAN PEDRO EVEN WITH A CAR YOU CAN'T GET ACROSS SAN PEDRO FOR THEY, IF CUSTOMERS CANNOT GET ACROSS, ACROSS SAN PEDRO, THEIR CUSTOMERS WON'T MAKE ANY MONEY. YOU WON'T MAKE ANY MONEY. THAT'S HOW THIS, DO YOU WANT ANOTHER LIGHT RAIL DEBACLE LIKE WE HAD YEARS AGO? THAT'S WHAT THIS IS IN THE MAKING HERE. PLEASE SAY NO TO THIS CRAZY THING. I'M SORRY. THE, YOU, YOU'RE GONNA SAY, WELL, WE'LL GET A FEW BUCKS FROM THE, FROM THE GOVERNMENT. NO, YOUR CUSTOMERS, YOU'RE GONNA MAKE LOSE OUT OF MONEY FROM YOUR CUSTOMERS ALONG SAN PEDRO AND FOR THAT MATTER ALONG COMMERCE AND ELSEWHERE THERE. THANK YOU, LUISA. SAMANTHA? HI, GOOD AFTERNOON. I WORK FOR THE COALITION FOR DIGNIFIED HOUSING, WHICH INCLUDES THE ESP JUSTICE CENTER, A DOMESTIC WORKERS UNION, AND THE HISTORIC WEST SIDE RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION. AND WE REJECT THE APPROVAL OF TODD ALONG ALL HISTORIC AND WORKING CLASS FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IT WILL, IT WILL INCENTIVIZE GENTRIFICATION AND THE IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE EXISTING NATURE OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE, OR THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF A BUILT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY IN PLACE. THE MAJORITY OF OUR RESIDENTS ARE LOWER INCOME WORKING CLASS FAMILIES AND LEGACY HOMEOWNERS WHO ARE ALREADY FACING THE ECONOMIC PRESSURES OF FIGHTING CODE COMPLIANCE SANCTIONS AND THE MAINTEN OF THEIR AGING HOMES. WE'RE ALSO HOME TO SEVERAL PUBLIC HOUSING AND HUD SUBSIDIZED SENIOR HOUSING APARTMENTS. AND UNLIKE OTHER RESIDENTS HAVE WHO'VE COMMENTED TODAY, WE ABSOLUTELY LOVE OUR NEIGHBORS. WHILE WE WILL BELIEVE IN [02:40:01] ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WE BELIEVE THAT THIS, IT SHOULD NOT DISPLACE LOW INCOME RESIDENTS TO REPLACE THEM WITH HIGHER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WHICH WE FEAR THIS NEW TODD REZONING WILL DO. PLEASE EXCLUDE ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES FROM TODD. AND IF WE CANNOT FORCE TODD DEVELOPERS TO KEEP RENTS AND BUSINESSES DEEPLY AFFORDABLE FOR, UM, THEN WE THINK IT WILL CAUSE MORE HARM THAN GOOD. IF TODD DOES GET ADOPTED, WE ASK THAT THE CITY PERMANENTLY FUND A RESIDENT DISPLACEMENT AND HOME THE MILITIAN MITIGATION PLAN. THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE JOEY P*****K. HE UNFORTUNATELY HAD TO LEAVE. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND, UH, READ HIS COMMENT. MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, MY NAME IS JOEY P*****K, NATIVE SAN ANTONIO TRANSIT USER, YOUR AVERAGE BIKE COMMUTER, AND THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ACTIVE SA, A LOCAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION. I AM HERE TODAY TO EXPRESS MY STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE UPCOMING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE STAFF. BASED ON THE EXTENSIVE WORK OF THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FORCE TASK FORCE. THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT I HAVE EMERGED FROM THE TOD TASK FORCE REPRESENT THE ACCUMULATION OF AN INCLUSIVE COLLABORATIVE PROCESS THAT TOOK PLACE OVER SEVERAL MONTHS. A WIDE RANGE OF PERSPECTIVES WERE CONSIDERED AND NUMEROUS CONCESSIONS WERE MADE TO ENSURE CONSENSUS AND BALANCE IN THE FINAL PROPOSALS. I BELIEVE THAT THE HALF ACRE LIMITATION, PARKING MINIMUMS AND MAPS ARE KEY COMPONENTS THAT REFLECT THE DIVERSE NEED OF OUR COMMUNITY. THESE MEASURES STRIKE AN IMPORTANT BALANCE BETWEEN PROMOTING DENSITY AND DEVELOPING NEAR TRANSIT HUBS, WHILE STILL ADDRESSING CONCERNS RAISED DURING THE TASK FORCE PROCESS. I ENCOURAGE YOUR COMMITTEE TO APPROVE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED. THESE STEPS ARE CRITICAL TO FOSTERING TRANSIT ORIENTED GROWTH AND MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE AND ACCESSIBLE TO ALL IN OUR GREAT CITY. LET'S MOVE FORWARD. LET'S MOVE TOWARD A FUTURE WITH A ROBUST MULTI MODEL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT IS PAIRED WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EQUITY, NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCEMENT, AND WALKABLE BIKEABLE SHADED STREETS TO GIVE US ALL. OKAY, THANKS JUDGE. A BETTER SHOT, QUALITY AND LIFE OPENS UP AVENUES TO A BETTER FUTURE FOR ALL SAN ANTONIO'S THROUGH TARGETED POLICY THAT ALLOWS MY NEIGHBORS TO LIVE A FULL AND COMPLETE LIFE WITHOUT SPENDING WILLIAM LONG. YES. UM, WELL GO AHEAD AND SAY I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT JOEY WAS TRYING TO SAY THERE. UM, MY NAME IS WILLIAM LONG AND I REPRESENT MY FAMILY, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS IN THE HARMONY HILLS AND ALTA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS. WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THAT BOTH THE HARMONY HILLS AND ALTA VISTA HOAS DON'T SPEAK FOR US. UM, I'VE, UH, YOU KNOW, WE'VE, WE'VE HAD OUR HOME IN ALTA VISTA FOR LIKE 50 PLUS YEARS AND WE'VE GONE TO ONE MEETING, SO THAT'S HOW MUCH WE APPRECIATE THEM. UM, AND EVEN LESS NOW, UH, UH, MOST RECENTLY ON FACEBOOK, ON ON FRIDAY, THEY, UH, GOT CAUGHT UP IN SO MUCH MISINFORMATION ABOUT THIS IN THE VIA PROJECT THAT THEY HAD TO CHANGE THEIR NAME, UH, UH, AND, AND DISASSOCIATE THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. SO, UM, I THINK THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES. UH, AT THE LAST MEETING I MENTIONED THAT ALL OF OUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS IN BOTH NEIGHBORHOODS THAT I'VE SPOKEN WITH ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE SAN ANTONIO'S TOD POLICY AND VIAS A RT PROJECT. UH, MY MOM'S HOUSE IN ALTA VISTA IS AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, IS AT THE CORNER OF WEST WOODLAWN AND BREEDEN, WHICH IS ONE BLOCK WEST OF SAN PEDRO. IN TOTAL, MY FAMILY HAS FIVE PROPERTIES WITHIN TWO BLOCKS OF SAN PEDRO. WE ALL SUPPORT THE TOD POLICY. WE ALL SUPPORT THE VART PROJECT, AND OVERALL, WE FEEL IT WILL ALLOW US TO MORE EASILY ENJOY OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. THANK YOU TO THE CITY STAFF AND TOD COMMITTEE FOR YOUR EFFORTS IN CREATING THE TOD POLICY. AND, UH, AS YOU CAN SEE, EVEN THOUGH I'M, I'M VERY, VERY INJURED, I I DIDN'T WANNA MISS MY CHANCE TO SUPPORT BOTH THE TOD POLICY AND VIA A RT. SO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME. THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT. ALRIGHT, UM, JUST LIKE TO EXTEND THANKS TO EVERYBODY THAT CAME TO SPEAK TODAY, APPRECIATE ALL YOUR COMMENTS AND YOUR TIME COMING DOWN TO THE MEETING. UM, WITH THAT, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE ON [New Business  ] TO OUR NEW BUSINESS. WE'RE GONNA MOVE, WE'RE GONNA START WITH ITEM NUMBER TWO. [02:45:08] ALL RIGHT, GOOD AFTERNOON. THANK YOU. MAKE SURE, OH, YOU'RE GONNA PULL IT UP. SO, GOOD AFTERNOON COMMITTEE MEMBERS. I'M KAT HERNANDEZ. I'M THE DIRECTOR FOR OUR CITY'S TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. UM, SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER ME FROM MY, UH, BACK IN THE DAYS OF, UH, BEING IN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. SO IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU, UM, ON WORKING ON THIS IMPORTANT MEASURE. UH, SO TODAY WHAT WE'RE GONNA BE TALKING ABOUT, UH, IS, UM, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AN EXISTING TOD ZONING CODE. MAKE SURE IT'S WORKING OKAY. YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M GONNA USE THE, THERE, I'M GONNA USE THE KEYBOARD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO FOR THOSE THAT MAY NOT BE AWARE, VIAS MOVING FORWARD WITH AN ADVANCED RAPID TRANSIT LINE. AND THE FIRST MAJOR PROJECT IS THE GREEN LINE THAT RUNS ALONG SAN PEDRO WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FROM THE AIR, FROM FROM THE AIRPORT TO STEVE'S. THE PROJECT INCLUDES CENTER RUNNING LANES IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS THAT YOU SEE ON THIS SLIDE, AS WELL AS BUSINESS ACCESS LANES, SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. THIS PROJECT ALLOWS THE CITY TO ALIGN THE WORK WE DO TO PLAN THE CITY AND FOCUS INVESTMENTS THAT BRING ABOUT GOOD CHANGE AROUND TRANSIT. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS RISING COSTS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING BY CREATING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS THAT ENCOURAGE DENSITY AND IMPROVED ACCESS TO A RANGE OF USES SUCH AS JOBS, RETAIL SERVICES IN SCHOOLS. AS A RESULT OF AN ENHANCED TRANSIT CORRIDOR, POLICY CHANGES ARE NEEDED TO ENABLE THIS TO OCCUR WHILE STILL PROTECTING OUR ESTABLISHED VIBRANT NEIGHBORHOODS. THE PROCESS STARTED LATE LAST YEAR WITH THE CREATION OF A TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP UNDER THE HOUSING COMMISSION WHOSE CHARGE WAS TO WORK ON RECOMMENDATIONS TO UPDATE THE UDC TO SUPPORT HOUSING NEAR TRANSIT. A REMOVING BARRIERS SUBCOMMITTEE UNDER THE HOUSING COMMISSION CONTINUES THEIR EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIC HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, ADOPTED BY COUNCIL WITH A FOCUS TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE POLICY FRAMEWORK THAT ADDRESS HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND ANTI DISPLACEMENT. AS THIS WAS A COMMON THING WE'VE HEARD DURING OUR EARLY ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS, AS WELL AS WHAT YOU'VE HEARD TODAY. FOLLOWING THE CREATION OF THE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP, A CCR WAS SUBMITTED TO CREATE A TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IN JANUARY, GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDED STAFF MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN AND THE CREATION OF A TASK FORCE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO UPDATE THE EXISTING TOD ZONING DISTRICT. ALL THIS WORK ULTIMATELY CULMINATES WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT-ORIENTED POLICY FRAMEWORK. THIS PROCESS INCLUDED SEVERAL PHASES OF ENGAGEMENT TO EDUCATE AND RECEIVE INPUT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FRAMEWORK AS WELL AS THE UPDATED ZONING CODE. SINCE THE KICKOFF OF THE PROJECT IN THE SPRING, WE'VE HELD OR ATTENDED OVER 75 MEETINGS AND EVENTS. OUR SURVEY HAD OVER A THOUSAND PARTICIPANTS IN OUR ESSAY SPEAKUP SITE THAT INCLUDED ALL THE INFORMATION FROM THE TASK FORCE AND COMMITTEES HAD OVER 23,000 VISITS. THE CURRENT TOD ZONING DISTRICT WAS ADOPTED WITH THE ORIGINAL ADOPTION OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OR UDC BACK IN 2001. AND IN OVER 20 YEARS, IT HAS ONLY BEEN USED THREE TIMES. THE CURRENT TOD IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED ANYWHERE WITHIN A HALF MILE OF ANY BUS STOP. THIS MEANS THAT THERE ARE NO GUARDRAILS LIMITING IT, IT'S ALSO NOT CONTEXT SENSITIVE TO NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE'S NO HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, NO REAR SETBACKS. IT'S JUST BASICALLY A GOOD DISTRICT TO APPLY TO VACANT PROPERTY TO CREATE A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT NEAR A BUS LINE. THIS PROCESS IS ONLY TO UPDATE THE CODE, SO IT ALLOWS FOR OPTIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT WHILE RESPECTING NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS PROCESS DOES NOT REZONE ANY PROPERTY, MEANING THAT APPLICANTS WANTING TO REZONE TO THE NEW TOD CODE WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THE REZONING PROCESS. SO WHY DO WE NEED TO UPDATE THE CODE? TOD IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO REALIZE BENEFITS ALONG OUR DEDICATED ADVANCED RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS. THESE BENEFITS INCLUDE COMPACT, LIVABLE, AND WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION ACCESS WHILE STRENGTHENING AND SUSTAINING OUR ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS. THE REVIEW OF THE CURRENT CODE ALLOWS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENSURE THAT OUR, THAT OUR TOD ZONING CODE IS ALIGNED WITH TRUE TRANSIT, CREATE PROTECTIONS FOR ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, AND CREATE A BETTER CODE, CREATING WALKABILITY TO PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION ON AN UPDATED CODE. THE TASK FORCE WAS CREATED EARLIER THIS YEAR AND INCLUDES REPRESENTATION FROM 13 REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND 13 RESIDENTS REPRESENTING ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE EXPERTS IN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING INDUSTRIES, AS WELL AS OUR PARTNER AGENCIES SUCH AS VIA [02:50:01] CENTRAL AND MPO, THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. THE TASK FORCE BEGAN MEETING IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR. IN TOTAL, THE TASK FORCE MET SEVEN TIMES OVER EIGHT MONTHS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROCESS INCLUDED THE FORMATION OF A SUBCOMMITTEE THAT INCLUDED 23 ADDITIONAL RESIDENTS, INCLUDING MEMBERS OF THE TASK FORCE AND OTHERS FROM DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE CITY. THE SUBCOMMITTEE WAS ASKED BY THE TASK FORCE TO DO A DEEPER DIVE ON THE APPLICABILITY IN THE LANGUAGE TO PROTECT EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, ESPECIALLY IN, IN OUR CORE OF THE CITY. THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES, THE SUBCOMMITTEE MET EIGHT TIMES OVER TWO AND A HALF MONTHS TO PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TASK FORCE TO CONSIDER ALMOST 50 COMMUNITY MEMBERS WERE PART OF THIS PROCESS, AND I DO WANNA THANK THEM FOR THEIR HARD WORK AND DEDICATION TO THIS PROCESS. SO SEVERAL, THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE INCLUDE THE CREATION OF THREE CATEGORIES OF TOD DISTRICTS. THE TRANSITION DISTRICT IS RESERVED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AT A MAXIMUM OF FIVE UNITS, AND THIS ALLOWS THE MIX OF HOUSING TYPES TO ADDRESS OUR NEED FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING. AND THIS DISTRICT SERVES AS A TRANSITION FROM MORE INTENSE DISTRICTS. THE MIXED USE DISTRICT CATEGORY ALLOWS FOR A MIX OF USES SUCH AS RETAIL SERVICE, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES. AND THIS CATEGORY INCLUDES FOUR DISTINCT LEVELS OF INTENSITY THAT ALLOW FOR INCREASED HEIGHT. THIS DISTRICT IS TO PROMOTE COMPACT, WALKABLE AND SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE HYBRID INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ALLOWS FOR A MIX OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND OTHER USES WITH TWO LEVELS OF INTENSITY FOR INCREASED HEIGHT AND SERVES AS A TRANSITION TO THE MIXED USE DISTRICTS. THIS IS A DISTRICT THAT YOU WOULD TYPICALLY SEE AT INTERSECTIONS OF MAJOR ARTERIALS OR AT HIGHWAYS AND THE TRANSIT CORRIDOR. THE WORK THAT THE TASK FORCE DID INCLUDES RECOMMENDING STANDARDS THAT PROTECT NEIGHBORHOODS FROM INCOMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT. THE CODE NOW INCORPORATES STANDARDS THAT CURRENTLY EXIST IN OUR UDC, INCLUDING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS THAT ENSURE HEIGHT COMPATIBILITY WITH A BUDDING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. AS SHOWN ON THE FIRST GRAPHIC, THE TASK FORCE ALSO RECOMMENDED UNIQUE STANDARDS THAT INCLUDE CHARACTERISTICS TO CREATE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENTS, SUCH AS MINIMUM DISTANCES BETWEEN DOORS ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND WINDOW REQUIREMENTS TO CREATE TRANSPARENCY INSTEAD OF LARGE AMOUNTS OF BLINK WALLS. SO, AS I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, THE CURRENT TOD ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWS ANYONE TO REQUEST TO REZONE WITHIN A HALF MILE OF ANY BUS STOP. THIS MEANS THAT ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES IN ORANGE ARE ELIGIBLE TO REZONE TO THE CURRENT TOD ZONING. DISTRICT TO D SHOULD BE SPECIFIC TO CORRIDORS THAT HAVE A HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT COMPONENT SO THAT YOU CAN FOCUS THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY TO THOSE CORRIDORS WHERE APPROPRIATE. THE SUBCOMMITTEE AND TASK FORCE TACKLED THIS AND RECOMMENDED A PROCESS THAT ALLOWS US TO CREATE THE GUARDRAILS FOR APPROPRIATE TOD APPLICABILITY. OOPS, SORRY. WHAT YOU SEE HERE IS HOW APPLICABILITY HAS BEEN NARROWED. IT IS NOW APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN CORRIDORS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED AS ART CORRIDORS. SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE ZOOMED IN MAP OF WHAT YOU SAW ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, THE APPLICABILITY OR ELIGIBILITY OF PROPERTIES IS ONLY LOCATED ALONG ART. SO THIS PUTS THE T IN TOD, THE PROCESS, THE TASK FORCE AND SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS TO GET TO THIS APPROACH STARTED WITH A DRAFT CODE THAT RECOMMENDED A HALF MILE A, A QUARTER OF A MILE APPLICABILITY. BUT THE DISCUSSION OF THE TASK FORCE INCREASED THAT VIEW SINCE WALKABILITY IS TYPICALLY A HALF MILE, WHICH REPRESENTS A 10 MINUTE WALK. WHILE A HALF MILE APPLICABILITY FOR TOD IS APPROPRIATE IN SOME AREAS ALONG THE CORRIDOR, THERE ARE AREAS IN WHICH THAT DRIVES IT DIRECTLY INTO THE MIDDLE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THE APPROACH BECAME A MORE CUSTOMIZED APPROACH, EXPANDING WHERE APPROPRIATE AND CONTRACTING WHERE WE NEED IT TO BE SENSITIVE. AND HERE IS WHAT'S RECOMMENDED IN THE CODE. A PROCESS THAT REQUIRES STAKEHOLDERS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND BUSINESSES TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BOUNDARIES ALONG ART CORRIDORS. ONLY. THROUGH THIS PROCESS, MAPS ARE REQUIRED TO ILLUSTRATE THE BOUNDARIES THAT ALLOW PROPERTY OWNERS TO REQUEST TO REZONE TO THE UPDATED TOD CODE. AS THE BOUNDARIES ARE DEVELOPED, THEY CAN BE SENSITIVE TO BUILT OUT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS THAT STILL ALLOW AND STILL ALLOW OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOD DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS SUCH AS OUR REGIONAL CENTERS. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS MAP, THE BOUNDARY RECOMMENDED IN THIS SECTION EXPANDS AROUND THE AREAS OF SAN PEDRO AND I IH 35, WHILE CONTRACTING AROUND ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS THAT GO NORTH. THE PROPOSED CODE STARTS WITH THE GREEN LINE. IN THIS CASE, THE MAPS DECREASE THE CURRENT APPLICABILITY OF A HALF MILE FROM ANY BUS STOP, WHICH BASICALLY COVERS ALL PROPERTIES ALL ALONG THIS CORRIDOR TO JUST THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY, [02:55:01] ALLOWING US TO PROTECT THE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH THESE MAPS. AS NEW CORRIDORS BECOME ART CORRIDORS, SUCH AS THE POTENTIAL FOR THE SILVER LINE, THE PROCESS REQUIRES THE CODE TO BE UPDATED AS WELL AS THE PROCESS TO CREATE THE BOUNDARY MAPS ALONG THAT CORRIDOR TO ESTABLISH NEW ELIGIBILITY AREAS. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS IN THE UPDATED CODE INCLUDE PROTECTIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOODS SUCH AS EXCLUDING PROPERTIES FROM BEING ABLE TO REZONE TO TOD THAT ARE EQUAL TO HALF AN ACRE OR LESS, THAT ARE SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTIES WITH SINGLE FAMILY USES OF FOUR UNITS OR LESS. THIS EXCLUSION PROTECTS OUR ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN OUR URBAN CORE. ADDITIONALLY, FOR PROPERTIES THAT ARE WITH, WITHIN HISTORIC DISTRICTS OR NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICTS OR OTHER OVERLAYS THAT HAVE DESIGN STANDARDS, THE CODE REQUIRES THAT TOD ZONE PROPERTIES COMPLY WITH THE OVERLAY DISTRICT STANDARDS. TOD TELLS THEM HOW TO USE IT ON THE INSIDE, BUT THE OVERLAY DISTRICTS TELL 'EM HOW IT'S DESIGNED ON THE OUTSIDE THE AVERAGE COST FOR INCORPORATING PARKING SPACES WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT RANGE FROM AROUND 2000 TO $10,000 A SPACE. DO UDC INTRODUCED MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN 1965 WITH NO UPDATES SINCE ITS ADOPTION PARKING MINIMUMS CREATE INEFFICIENT USE OF LAND, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO DESIGN NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE IT IS EASY FOR PEOPLE TO WALK AND USE PUBLIC TRANSIT TO GET AROUND. THIS CAN ALSO LEAD TO A FORM OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WE CALL URBAN SPRAWL. SO FOCUSING ON TOD AND REDUCING PARKING MINIMUMS ALSO PROMOTES GREATER SOCIAL EQUITY IN A COMMUNITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS, RAISE RENT PRICES AND INHIBIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. REQUIRING NEW DEVELOPMENTS TO COMPLY WITH A 60-YEAR-OLD CODE IS LIKE REQUIRING NEW CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS TO COMPLY WITH 60-YEAR-OLD BUILDING CODES. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY UPDATES AND CITIES NEED TO MAKE SURE CODES ARE UPDATED TO REFLECT CURRENT TRENDS AND STANDARDS. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS RECOMMEND A 50% REDUCTION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL ONLY DISTRICT AND NO MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MIXED USE IN HYBRID INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS. HOWEVER, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WON'T PROVIDE PARKING, IT JUST MEANS WE AREN'T HOLDING THEM TO ARCHAIC RULES, BUT ALLOWING THE PARKING PROVIDED TO BE DETERMINED BY THE MARKET. LASTLY, THE PROPOSED REVISIONS INCLUDE REMOVING LANGUAGE IN ANOTHER CODE. THE SIGN CODE RELATED TO A FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT THAT NOW CREATES A CODE CONFLICT. THE SIGN CODE INCLUDES SIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR URBAN CORRIDORS WITHIN OUR CITY. SIX CORRIDORS EXIST THAT ALSO INCLUDE SAN PEDRO, AND SOME OF THESE CORRIDORS HAVE MINIMUM FRONT BUILDING SETBACKS. THE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP'S RECOMMENDATION INCLUDES REMOVING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THESE URBAN URBAN CORRIDORS SO THAT THE, THE SIGN CODE NOW JUST FOCUSES ON SIGNS. EVENTUALLY THE CODE WILL BE UPDATED FOR ALL OF THE CORRIDORS, BUT WE ARE JUST RECOMMENDING THE REMOVAL OF THAT CONFLICT FOR THE SAN PEDRO CORRIDOR ONLY FOR NOW. SO OUR ENGAGEMENT STILL CONTINUES OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. NOW THAT WE HAVE A DRAFT OF A MAP OF MAPS AND DRAFT OF THE CODE, WE'RE HOSTING TWO COMMUNITY MEETINGS IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER TO PRESENT ON THE DRAFT FRAMEWORK AND UPDATED CODE AND BOUNDARY MAPS. OVER 10,000 RESIDENTS AND OWNERS WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE CORRIDOR AND WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES HAVE BEEN SENT MAILERS ABOUT THE MEETINGS AND OUR ESSAY SPEAKUP SITE. SO THEY HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE PROPOSED DOCUMENTS AND DATES OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. WE'RE ALSO POSTING IT ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO WIDEN THE NET. THIS ALLOWS INPUT ON THE DRAFT DOCUMENT AND MAPS SO THAT ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER THE FEEDBACK. AND THAT BRINGS ME TO OUR NEXT STEPS OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. IN ADDITION TO THE COMMUNITY MEETINGS, WE WILL ALSO BE PRESENTING TO OUR APPROPRIATE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ZONING COMMISSION, PLANNING COMMISSION, HOUSING COMMISSION UNTIL WE GET BACK TO CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION AND ACTION IN DECEMBER. AFTER COUNCIL CONSIDERATION, WE WILL BEGIN PHASE TWO WITH DEVELOPING A STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. THE FY 25 BUDGET INCLUDED FUNDS TO WORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS PUT FORWARD BY THE TASK FORCE AFTER EIGHT MONTHS OF WORK, LISTENING TO FEEDBACK FROM ALL NEIGHBORHOODS AND RESIDENTS WHO ATTENDED AND SPOKE OR PROVIDED INPUT IN OTHER WAYS. AND BEFORE I FINISH, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR DEPARTMENTS, OUR STAKEHOLDERS, UH, FROM ALL THE GROUPS AND COMMITTEES THAT WERE INVOLVED FOR THEIR WORK THIS PAST YEAR ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FRAMEWORK AND THE UPDATE TO THE, UH, TO THE CODE, AS WELL AS OUR TEAM MEMBERS FROM OUR TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. WE'RE EXCITED TO COLLABORATE WITH OUR PARTNERS AT V ON THIS IMPORTANT INITIATIVE. AND WITH THAT, WE'RE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, KAT. LOOKS LIKE YOU GUYS PUT A LOT OF BLOOD, [03:00:01] SWEAT AND TEARS INTO THIS. SO APPRECIATE YOURS AND EVERYONE ON YOUR TEAM'S TIME AND EFFORT ON THIS. IT WAS A HEAVY LIFT, SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YEP. UM, I DO WANT TO CLARIFY SOMETHING FOR THE COMMITTEE IS THAT, UM, WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING THE MAPS AS PART OF OUR DECISION TODAY. THE MAPS ARE NOT PART OF THE CODE LANGUAGE, SO IT'S ONLY THE LANGUAGE IN THE CODE THAT WE'RE, THAT WE'RE REVIEWING. OKAY. ALRIGHT. UM, DOES THAT COVER WHAT THE CITY ATTORNEY WANTED TO COMMENT ONTO? YES. THAT'S EVERYTHING THAT'LL BE HEARD AT ZONING. OKAY. RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, WELL, WE'LL START DELIBERATION HERE WITH THE COMMITTEE. UM, WE WILL JUST, IF YOU'VE GOT A QUESTION, UM, WE, WE CAN JUST START GOING LEFT OR RIGHT HERE. OKAY. KA THERE WERE THREE MAJOR KIND OF THEMES IN THE COMMENTS WE HEARD THAT WERE NOT SUPPORTIVE. ONE OF THEM WAS OBVIOUSLY THE MAPS WHICH GEORGE ADDRESSED THAT WE'RE NOT ADOPTING TODAY. UH, THE SECOND WAS THIS COMMENT ABOUT ALCOHOL. AND SO CAN YOU CLARIFY, 'CAUSE AS I READ THIS TODAY, ALCOHOL'S ALLOWED PER BASE ZONING, WHATEVER THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE. BUT GOING FORWARD, ALCOHOL AND TOD WOULD REQUIRE A SPECIAL AN S PERMIT, MEANING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT. IS THAT, SO WHAT WHAT BECOMES OF ALCOHOL IN THE NEW TOD IN THE PROPOSED CODE INCLUDES A PERMITTED USE TABLE AS WITH ALL OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS BECAUSE TOD IS A SPECIAL DISTRICT, NOT YOUR TRADITIONAL BASED DISTRICT. UH, IT INCLUDES A PERMITTED USE TABLE FOR BOTH NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE PROPOSED, UH, UH, CODE AMENDMENT BASED ON THE, UH, RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE TASK FORCE. ALL OF THE ALCOHOL USES SUCH AS BARS, UM, UH, WHAT DO THEY CALL CLUBS? UM, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT USES, UH, REQUIRE AN S WHICH IS A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION IN THE MX DISTRICTS. UM, AND SO THAT WAS, I I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE STATEMENT THAT THEY'RE SAYING THAT THEY'RE IN SUPPORT OF BECAUSE THAT'S IN THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. SO THEY DON'T WANNA SEE THAT S UH, GO AWAY. AND THEN THE THIRD KIND OF MAJOR THEME WAS THIS THRESHOLD THAT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED OF HALF ACRE ABOVE AND BELOW FOR RESIDENTIAL. WHAT WAS THE DISCUSSION WITH THE COMMITTEE? I MEAN, WE DON'T GIVE US A LITTLE BIT OF THAT BACKGROUND SURE. AND WHY THEY DECIDED IT THERE. SURE. SO, UM, WHEN WE STARTED THIS PROCESS, WE STARTED THIS PROCESS WHEN THE MAPS WERE LOOKING AT ABOUT A, A A HALF A MILE, UH, FROM THE CORRIDOR, WHETHER IT WAS A HALF MILE RADIUS FROM EACH STATION AREA OR A HALF MILE FROM THE CORRIDOR ITSELF, JUST ONE LINE GOING ALONG DOWN THE CORRIDOR. AND SO THE DISCUSSION, UH, THAT BOTH THE TASK FORCE AND SUBCOMMITTEE HAD WAS WE NEED TO CREATE A LANGUAGE THAT WOULD PROTECT, UM, NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WOULD PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. AND SO THE ORIGINAL ITERATION, UH, WAS UM, WAS APPROVED BY THE TASK FORCE BASED ON, UM, INPUT BY MEMBERS OF THE TASK FORCE FOR THE HALF THE HALF ACRE LIMITATION. AT THAT TIME, THEY HAD DONE, ESPECIALLY THESE NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE URBAN CORE, HAD DONE A REVIEW OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AND, AND DETERMINED THAT, UM, OVER 90% OF THEIR LOTS WERE HALF ACRE OR LESS. UM, BUT THEN IT WAS REVISITED LATER, UH, BY, UH, THE SUBCOMMITTEE ASKING THE TASK FORCE TO REVISIT IT TO SAY, NO MATTER THE SIZE, UM, WE WANNA EXCLUDE IT, EXCLUDE ALL OF THOSE RESIDENTIAL LOTS. AND THERE WAS A BIG DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THERE WERE CONCERNS FROM OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY OF THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES THAT COULD OCCUR. UM, WE HAVE OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY THAT HAVE CURRENTLY ARE SIX AND R FIVE, UH, ZONED PROPERTIES THAT ARE WELL OVER 10 ACRES, SOME EVEN 30 ACRES ALONG MAJOR ARTERIALS. AND THE REASON WHY THEY'RE STILL THAT WAY IS BECAUSE OF, UH, ANNEXATION POLICIES THAT HAD OCCURRED MANY DECADES AGO. UH, WHEN WE ANNEXED PROPERTIES, WE BROUGHT 'EM IN WITH TEMP ZONING, WHICH WAS THE TEMP R ONE ZONING OR TEMP A ZONING, UH, WHICH WAS THE OLD 9 19 38 CODE. UM, AND SO WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE CODES, ALL THEY DID WAS CONVERT AND THEY CONVERTED TO THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS. AND THE CITY HAS NEVER GONE BACK, UH, TO REZONE THOSE. YOU'LL SEE SOME OF THOSE EVEN ALONG LOOP 1604. UM, AND, UH, AND WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT, UH, PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS THEN HAVE TO COME THROUGH THE ZONING PROCESS IN ORDER TO REZONE THEM. SO, UH, THAT'S WHY THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS DISCUSSED AS THE UNINTENDED CONS, CONSEQUENCES OF YOU SAY, NO MATTER THE SIZE, THEN WE LOSE THAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THAT PROPERTY OWNER TO REQUEST TOD SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN R SIX ZONE LOT THAT'S 30 ACRES THAT HAS A BARN ON IT. SO KAT KIND OF FURTHER CLARIFYING THAT IF I OWNED, UH, THREE QUARTERS OF AN ACRE IN WHAT BECOMES PART OF A TOD OVERLAY, I DON'T REZONE UNLESS I INITIATE A REZONING OR I SELL TO SOMEONE WHO INITIATES A CHANGE OF USE IN ZONING. RIGHT. THOSE MAPS DO NOT APPLY TO OD AUTOMATICALLY. IT JUST MEANS [03:05:01] THAT WE ARE NOW RESTRICTING THE AREAS THAT ARE ELIGIBLE TODAY TO ONLY THIS AREA OF THAT'S, THAT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TOMORROW. BASICALLY GOING FROM 300 SQUARE MILES THAT IS APPLICABLE TODAY TO JUST OVER THREE SQUARE MILES. YEAH. UM, CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. WE'RE, OUR CHARGE AS A COMMITTEE IS NOT ON THE MAP, IT'S ON THE PROCESS AND THE POLICY. KAT, CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? ASHLEY FERRYMAN, BEFORE SHE HAD TO LEAVE, 'CAUSE SHE HAD A CONFLICT, GAVE ME A COUPLE OF THINGS, UH, THAT SHE WAS CURIOUS ABOUT. AND ONE OF THEM HAD TO DO WITH TABLE 3 42 DASH 0.02 DASH THREE, WHICH, UM, I UNDERSTAND THE SPECIAL USE PERMITS ON A TOD MX, BUT THE ONE THAT SEEMS THE, UH, ODD IS THE BEVERAGE RETAIL STORE, UH, SALES, LIQUOR STORE, PACKAGE STORE, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, THAT'S NOT CONSUMPTION THAT YOU BUY AND GO, WHY WOULD THAT BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN A TOD? SO IN AUGUST, THE TASK FORCE ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED, UH, THAT USE IN THE MX DISTRICT TO BE PERMITTED BY WRIGHT. BUT IN SEPTEMBER, UM, THERE WERE CONCERNS BY THE TASK FORCE THAT ALTHOUGH IT IS RETAIL, UH, THERE WERE CONCERNS THAT, UH, PEOPLE DON'T JUST GO IN THERE, PICK IT UP, GO BACK TO THE CAR AND LEAVE, THAT THERE IS ACTIVITIES THAT OCCUR IN PARKING LOTS. THERE'S ALSO CONCERNS ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE PREVALENT USE OR THE PREVALENT AVAILABILITY OF ALCOHOL, UM, AND, UM, THE, THE CURRENT EXPERIENCES WITH DRINKING AND DRIVING, UM, AND OTHER THINGS RELATED TO THAT THAT COULD RESULT IN, UH, FATALITIES. SO THERE WAS A CONCERN BY TASK FORCE MEMBERS, AND SO THEY REOPENED IT AND, AND VOTED TO ESTABLISH, UH, A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR ALL OF THOSE ALCOHOL USES IN THE MX DISTRICT. SO, SO CAPTAIN, I MEAN, THE PRIMARY USE HAS TO BE, SO CAN AN HEB WHO ALSO MIGHT SELL ADULT BEVERAGES. AN HEB IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS A LIQUOR STORE. OKAY. SO IT ONLY IS A LIQUOR STORE, NOT WHO ALSO SELLS ALCOHOL AS A PORTION OF THEIR BUSINESS. CORRECT. OR IF YOU'RE A WINE STORE BECAUSE THEY HAVE WINE BOUTIQUE IS ALSO A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WHERE THEY JUST SELL RETAIL WINE, YOU KNOW? YEAH. SO WINE BOUTIQUE IS SIMILAR TO THOSE WHERE YOU GO FOR THE TASTINGS. YEAH. SO THEY REQUESTED THAT IT BE AN S AS WELL, JUST IN THE MX IT'S UP TO GEORGE. WHAT ABOUT RESTAURANTS WHO SERVE ALCOHOL WITH FOOD? MANY OF WHICH, YOU KNOW, REALLY BECOME BARS SINCE WE DON'T REALLY HAVE A CLASSIFICATION THAT REQUIRES THEM TO REPORT THEIR FOOD CELLS. SO RESTAURANTS ARE CLASSIFIED AS FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS. THOSE WOULD BE PERMITTED BY, RIGHT. UH, THEY DO HAVE TO MEET A CERTAIN, UH, PERCENTAGE IF THEY GO OVER THAT PERCENTAGE. AND THAT IS IN THE, UH, APPENDIX DAY OF THE DEFINITIONS FOR THEIR ANNUAL SALES. UH, THEY CAN RECEIVE A CODE CITATION, SO THEY DO HAVE TO REPORT ANNUAL SALES. GREAT. THANK YOU. THANKS FOR YOUR PRESENTATION, KAT. UM, I HAVE SEVERAL COMMENTS THAT I'D LIKE TO MAKE REGARDING SOME OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS THAT WE HEARD. I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE AND ENSURE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WERE NOT REPRESENTED ON THE TASK FORCE HAVE A VOICE. IT IS SO IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT THEY RECEIVED AN AUTOMATIC, YOU KNOW, INVITATION TO GO TO SA SPEAK UP AND LOOK AT THE MAPS IN APRIL, BUT THE MAPS DIDN'T COME OUT TILL A LITTLE BIT AFTER THAT. THERE'S BEEN NO PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT THESE MAPS UNTIL TODAY BECAUSE THEY WERE APPROVED AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER. JUST LIKE THE CODE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IN EVALUATING, I'D LIKE US TO GO LINE BY LINE, ACTUALLY. UM, IT HAS NOT SEEN THE OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. SO EVEN THOUGH THERE'S BEEN PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, I THANK YOU FOR ALL THE EVENTS THAT YOU'VE HAD. BUT DURING THOSE EVENTS, PEOPLE WEREN'T ASKED, DO YOU WANT PARKING OR DO YOU NOT WANT PARKING? WHAT KIND OF SETBACKS DO YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? DO YOU WANT ALCOHOL? THOSE THINGS WERE NOT ASKED. SO WHEN WE HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT TODAY, I WANT TO EXPRESS UPON YOU HOW VALUABLE THAT IS AND THANK EVERYBODY FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMMENT. BECAUSE WHEN YOU TOOK THE TOD SURVEY, IT WAS ALL ABOUT, YOU KNOW, DENSITY. IT WAS ALL ABOUT CONCEPTUAL, BUT IT WASN'T ABOUT THE NUTS AND BOLTS. AND THE NUTS AND BOLTS ARE WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IN THE TABLE TODAY. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE RELAXATION OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENT AND HOW THAT IMPACTS, THERE WERE SOME REALLY BIG POINTS THAT WERE MADE, UM, BY KING WILLIAM AND LAVACCA. AND IF YOU LOOK AT SOUTH TOWN, IF EVERYBODY'S EVER BEEN DOWN THERE ON A FIRST FRIDAY, HAVE YOU TRIED TO PARK, HAVE YOU TRIED TO PARK AT ANY TIME DURING THAT TIME? THEY'RE THE ONLY AREA IN THE CITY THAT HAS A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM TODAY, AND THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ADEQUATE ON STREET PARKING. IT'S BEEN JUSTIFIED. IT'S DOCUMENTED. THEY ALSO HAVE THE LARGEST CONCENTRATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS WHILE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO [03:10:01] HAVE ONE OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENT. WE KNOW ALL TOO OFTEN PEOPLE COME WITH MORE THAN ONE PARKING SPOT. SO I THINK WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PARKING, IT IS VERY UNIQUE TO THAT SOUTH TOWN AREA, UH, THAT SEES THAT, UM, THAT, THAT, UH, THAT STRESSOR, THAT FRICTION IN THEIR COMMUNITY. THEY ALSO HAVE THE LARGEST CONCENTRATION OF IDZ ZONED PROPERTIES. AND I WOULD HOPE, UH, KAT, IF YOU COULD LET PEOPLE KNOW THERE ARE OTHER TOOLS IN THE ZONING TOOLBOX THAT ARE TOD FRIENDLY, LIKE IDZ ZONING, WHICH NEGATES SOME OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. AND SO WHEN WE LOOK AT, I KNOW WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO TALK ABOUT THE MAPS, EVEN THOUGH THE MAPS ARE AGENDIZED AND REFERENCED IN THE CODE THAT WE'RE REVIEWING. SO ARE WE STRIKING THOSE SECTIONS FROM THE CODE? I, I NEEDED A CLARIFICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THAT. SURE. YEAH. WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE, THE UDC CODE PROVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN RECOMMENDED FOR THIS AMENDMENT. AS OF RIGHT NOW, WE DON'T HAVE, THE MAP THAT'S ATTACHED ON THE AGENDA IS FOR CONTEXTUAL PURPOSES. SO THE LANGUAGE IN THE UDC CODE THAT REFERENCES THE MAP, WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING THAT LANGUAGE AS AN ACTION TODAY. IS THAT CORRECT? NO, THAT'S NOT CORRECT. IF IT'S A PART OF THE UDC CODE, AN AMENDMENT THEREOF, THEN YES, THAT IS ON THE DISCUSSION TABLE TODAY. BUT WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO GRAPHIC TO TALK ABOUT THE GRAPHIC. WE'RE ONLY GONNA TALK ABOUT IT IN WORDING. IS THAT MY UNDERSTANDING? THE, OKAY, SO THE, AND I, I THINK KA MIGHT BE ABLE TO EXPAND ON THIS A LITTLE BIT, BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT WHAT CAN HAPPEN INSIDE OF A TOD ZONING COMMISSION WILL DECIDE WHERE THAT TO OD CAN BE, RIGHT? JUST TO HELP PRI PROVIDE CLARIFICATION, WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT, WHAT'S IN THE CODE IS THE PROCESS TO CREATE THE MAPS. AND THE FIRST ONE THAT'S INCLUDED INTO IT IS THE GREEN LINE. SO THAT'S THE ACTUAL TEXT THAT'S IN THE CODE. UM, WHAT, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE GRAPHIC, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE ILLUSTRATION ON THE MAP AND WHAT THE BOUNDARIES LOOK LIKE, HOW THE BOUNDARIES MOVE AROUND OR SHIFT, UH, WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT'S CONSIDERED BY ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DO, UH, FOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICTS AND EVEN PLANNING AREAS. THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION, TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STARTS WITH THE ENABLING ORDINANCE. THIS IS LIKE THAT AN EN AN ENABLING ORDINANCE. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THAT WHEN YOU CREATE THE NEW DISTRICTS? THOSE DO NOT COME BACK TO PTAC. THOSE GO STRAIGHT TO ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. THAT MAKES SENSE. I JUST WAS CONCERNED BECAUSE IT DOES, IT IS REFERENCED IN THE LANGUAGE, THE MAPS AND WHAT WE ARE WHEN PEOPLE SAW THE MAPS TOO, LIKE I SAID, YOU KNOW, HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE THESE MAPS, UM, IS A CONCERN AND ENSURING THAT WE ALLOW EVERYBODY THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK. I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE HAVE EVEN OPTED OUT AND IN THEIR OPT OUT IS NOT REFLECTED ON THOSE MAPS THAT ARE CURRENTLY POSTED. SO IT'S A DYNAMIC SITUATION. I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE FOR EVERYBODY. BUT CHAIR, I WAS GONNA ASK IF WE COULD GO LINE ITEM BY LINE ITEM AND START HITTING THESE SECTIONS, UM, TO BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH IT. CAN YOU CLARIFY LINE ITEM BY LINE ITEM? 'CAUSE I DON'T THINK WE'VE GOT THE, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO READ EVERY WORD ON THIS THING AND GO DOWN THROUGH EVERY SINGLE LINE. NO, BY SECTION, BY SECTION. UH, SO WE CAN TALK ABOUT, UM, DO YOU WANT ME TO PULL CONTROL? I'LL PULL. DO YOU WANT ME TO PULL UP MY PAGES? SO, THANKS KAT. THAT WAS AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION THAT ALL WE'RE DOING IS REVIEWING THE VEHICLE THAT CREATES THE MAPS. YOU, YOU JUST HAPPEN TO BE AHEAD OF THE GAME BY HAVING MAPS. YES, WE'RE DOING IT CONCURRENTLY. YES. RIGHT. AND THIS IS, SO OUR PURVIEW IS SIMPLY A VEHICLE TO CREATE THE MAP. CORRECT. IS ALL THAT IS. SO MY CONCERN WOULD BE APPLICABILITY A NUMBER ONE B STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION. IT SAID THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING AND ADOPTING A MAP TO ILLUSTRATE THE BOUNDARIES ELIGIBLE FOR TOD ZONING APPLICATIONS SHOULD INVOLVE KEY STAKEHOLDERS. I WANT TO ENSURE THAT MOVING FORWARD THEY SHALL INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS. UM, I DON'T THINK THIS SHOULD BE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS AT ANY TIME. AND THERE'S A CLEAR, UH, ADOPTION THAT OCCURRED, UH, WITH LANGUAGE ON WHO THOSE INDIVIDUALS SHOULD BE. AND SO I JUST WANTED TO ASK, UM, IF FOR THAT CONSIDERATION, DO YOU WANT WHAT LINE, BIANCA, WHAT LINE WAS THAT ON THE SHOULD VERSUS SHALL? IT'S ON THE SECOND LINE ON PAGE TWO UNDER B STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION. DO YOU WANNA PULL IT UP? YEAH. SO WE'LL PULL IT UP HERE. UM, AND THIS ACTUALLY WAS, UH, WHAT BIANCA'S BRINGING UP IS, WAS DISCUSSED AT THE TASK FORCE AS WELL, INCLUDING THE SUBCOMMITTEE. SO, UH, BOTH, UH, BOTH ENTITIES DISCUSS THIS. UM, AND THEN, UH, I'LL, I'LL LET AUDREY ALSO CHIME IN AS WELL. SO IN THIS LIST IT SAYS, SHOULD INVOLVE ALL STAKEHOLDER HOLDERS WITHIN, UH, A HALF MILE SO THAT WE ARE INCLUSIVE OF INVITING ALL PROPERTY OWNERS, RESIDENTS IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, NONPROFITS, MAJOR EMPLOYERS. AND THE LIST GOES ON. SO THAT WE, YOU, YOU CASTING OUT THAT THAT WIDE NET, UH, ONE OF THE CONCERNS WAS IS THAT, UM, MAKING IT SHELL COULD BE A CHALLENGE IN THE PROCESS IF YOUR STAKEHOLDER GROUP DOES NOT INCLUDE A NONPROFIT BECAUSE A NONPROFIT DOESN'T EXIST IN THAT AREA. AND UH, SO THAT'S WHY WE DID SHOULD, BUT WE INCORPORATED [03:15:01] SHALL BE INVITED TO ATTEND. SO THAT WAY IT REQUIRES, UM, THE INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS. AUDREY, I'LL LEAVE IT TO YOU AFTER TO COMMENT. YEAH. THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, UH, WORKED WITH THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ON THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE THAT WAS DISCUSSED BY THE TASK FORCE, UH, REFERENCING THE SHALL. UH, AND THERE WERE CONCERNS RELATED TO HOW THAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE IMPLEMENTED IF IT WAS ADOPTED BECAUSE LIKE KA IS SAYING, SHALL MEANS IT'S MANDATORY AND A LOT OF THESE AREAS YOU HAVE DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS FOR DIFFERENT AREAS THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED, BUT SHALL WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO MEET THE ENTIRE LIST. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE CHANGED TO SHOULD THE SHALL DOES APPLY TO THE STAKEHOLDER PROCESS. SO THERE IS A PROCESS, IT'S, THERE WILL BE STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT, BUT WHO ACTUALLY GETS INCLUDED SHOULD BE DONE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. THAT'S OUR RECOMMENDATION. MANA MANA. UM, SO I, SO UM, WE SIT ON A COUPLE BOARDS AND SO WE DO USE, UH, NOTIFICATION LISTS FROM THE CITY, FROM APPROVED LIST THAT THE CITY PROVIDES, BE IT, UM, UH, RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, YOU KNOW, AND THE 200 FOOT PERIMETERS. AND SO I GUESS I WOULD ASK WHY SOMETHING ALONG THAT LINE CAN'T BE STATED, YOU KNOW, FOR, YOU KNOW, THAT ON THE SHALL PART OF IT, UM, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, I DID HEAR STATEMENTS HERE MADE BY PEOPLE WHO WERE AROUND SOME OF THE, SOME OF THE DRAWINGS AND MAPS, YOU KNOW, TALKING ABOUT NOT BEING INCLUDED AND I GUESS, YOU KNOW, LOOKING FOR WAYS TO WHERE WE'VE ENSURE THAT THEY WOULD BE INCLUDED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS WITH THE CITY. SO YES, WE DO HAVE A REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION LIST THAT, THAT IS LISTED. UM, WE COULD ADD ALL, WELL WE, THE REASON WHY WE SAY ALL IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS IS BECAUSE SOMETIMES SOME OF THOSE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AREN'T REGISTERED WITH THE CITY. RIGHT, EXACTLY. UH, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A REGISTRATION LIST FOR ALL OF THE OTHER GROUPS THAT ARE IN HERE. AND SO THAT'S WHY IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SAY WELL ONLY REGISTER WITH THE CITY IF WE DON'T HAVE 'EM. SO KA THIS LIST GOES FARTHER THAN WHAT WE DO ON A STANDARD ZONING CASE. CORRECT? CORRECT. BECAUSE STANDARD IT'S 200 FOOT PERIMETER AND REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. BUT THIS LIST GOES FARTHER, WHICH IS WHY THEY TOOK THE SHALL OUT AUDREY. JUST 'CAUSE IT WAS OF A CONCERN TOO MUCH. YES. THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP WANTED A LARGER LIST OF PEOPLE TO BE INCLUDED IN GROUPS AND SO THAT'S, YES. SO, SO KAT, THAT LIST OF FOLKS WILL STILL HAVE A STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS ON THE MAPS GOING FORWARD. CORRECT. IF THEY CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROCESS AFTER THEY SHALL GET THE INVITATION, THEN YES, THEY WOULD BE PART OF THAT GROUP. HAVEN'T WE HAVEN'T PASSED THAT STEP? NO. FOR THE MAPS SO THAT WE STILL HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL OF THOSE GROUPS AND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS TO PARTICIPATE. SO THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW IN THIS PROCESS FOR THE GREEN LINE. RIGHT? THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. THAT'S INDEPENDENT OF THIS. CORRECT. OKAY. SO I GOT CONFUSED . SO, SO, SO IS THERE A SHALL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND THE 200 FOOT NEIGHBORS? SO THERE'S OR NO? SO IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT CREATING A STAKEHOLDER GROUP PROCESS, IT SAYS SHOULD, BUT ONCE YOU ESTABLISH THAT LIST, YOU SHALL INVITE THEM INTO THAT PROCESS. AND SO YOU WORK WITH ALL OF THE RESOURCES THAT YOU HAVE THAT INCLUDE THE REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. SO YOU WOULD START THERE, BUT WE, WE ARE WELL AWARE THAT THERE ARE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS THAT SOMETIMES EITHER DROP THEIR REGISTRATION, UM, AND IN THIS CASE, AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS, WE FOUND OUT THAT FIVE POINTS HAD DROPPED THEIR RES THEIR UH, THEIR REPRESENTATION OR THEIR REGISTRATION. SO WE HAD TO WORK WITH THE COUNCIL OFFICE TO SEEK THEM OUT IN ORDER TO TELL 'EM I DON'T HAVE ANY CONTACT INFORMATION 'CAUSE YOU'RE NOT REGISTERED ANYMORE. BUT, UM, YOU, UH, YOU'VE BEEN ASKED TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PROCESS. SO THAT'S WHY IT DOESN'T SAY JUST REGISTERED BEFORE THE ACTUAL ZONING REZONING ITSELF TO TOD. THEY SHALL BE NOTIFIED AS A REGISTERED YES. IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO REZONE THE ELIGIBILITY MAP THAT EVERYBODY SHOULD BUT SHALL FOR ACTUAL ZONING. CORRECT? YES. IF, IF THERE IS A REZONING, IT'S A SHALL THEY HAVE TO BE NOTIFIED OF THAT, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE WITHIN 200 FEET. SO, POINT OF CLARIFICATION. SO BUILDING ON WHAT MR. MANNA WAS SAYING, IF YOU GO TO THE LAST SENTENCE IN THAT PARAGRAPH WHERE THE MAPS WILL UNDERGO CONTINUING CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW TO CLARIFY AND IDENTIFY ANY PROGRAMS OR POLICY INCONSISTENCIES, THEN IT SAYS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAPS SHALL GO THROUGH A PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS. COULD IT ALSO SAY, SHALL INCLUDE THE REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS OR SHALL INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN, WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE CORRIDOR WITHIN A QUARTER MILE. I MEAN, I I THINK THAT'S THE WAY YOU CIRCUMVENT THIS AT THIS POINT, TO ENSURE THAT THOSE THAT ARE RECOGNIZED, UM, WITH THE CITY THAT THEY ARE ENGAGED, UM, THEY'RE GOING TO BE NOTIFIED WHEN IT GOES THROUGH A REZONING. BUT WE'VE, WE'VE HEARD SO MUCH CONCERN ABOUT THE MAPS. IS THERE ANY [03:20:01] WAY TO ADD THAT CAVEAT AT THAT LINE? THANK YOU. YEAH, SO I THINK KA ALREADY MENTIONED THE FACT THAT IT COULD POTENTIALLY LIMIT YOU BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE EVERYTHING REGISTERED. THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT IS IF YOU WERE TO MANDATE INVOLVEMENT OF EVERY SINGLE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION, IF ONE OF 'EM REFUSES TO ACTUALLY BE A PART OF THE CONVERSATION, THEN IT COULD POTENTIALLY INVALIDATE YOUR ABILITY TO CREATE THIS TOD. SO IF IT'S A ONE PERSON REFUSING TO PARTICIPATE COULD MAKE IT TO WHERE THIS, THIS TOD WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BE FORMED. OKAY. UM, I'M CONFUSED THERE. 'CAUSE WE DO HAVE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE SEND OUT FOR BOA AND ZONING AND, AND ALL THOSE OTHER THINGS WE'RE, THEY DON'T PARTICIPATE, BUT WE STILL MOVE THROUGH WITH THOSE. AND SO JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND YO YEAH, THERE'S FOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT WE HAVE, BUT IF WE'RE SAYING THAT THE PROCESS SHALL INVOLVE THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND IF THEY ARE NOT WILLING TO BE A PART OF THAT PROCESS, THAT'S THE ISSUE WITHOUT ADDING THAT MANDATORY LANGUAGE, MAYBE SHALL NOTIFY. YEP. SO WE COULD PUT SHALL NOTIFY THEN. YEAH. SO THREE LINES ABOVE IT, IT SAYS THAT THEY SHALL BE INVITED THREE LINES ABOVE THAT YOU'RE TALKING RIGHT NOW, THREE LINES ABOVE SAYS THEY SHALL INVITE THEM TO PARTICIPATE IN A SIT AND ASSIST WITH MAP DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S, THAT'S SHALL NOTIFY BASICALLY. YES. I THINK IT SUFFICES. YES, MA'AM. I GUESS THE STAKEHOLDER QUESTION. AND SO, SO WHO'S, WHO ARE THE APPROPRIATE STAKEHOLDERS AND, AND YOU KNOW, JUST, UH, AND YOU KNOW, I'M JUST SO USED TO MY OTHER LANGUAGE IN THE OTHER MEETINGS AND, AND THE 200 FOOT, YOU KNOW, UM, UM, PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEN THE, THE, UH, REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. THAT'S, THAT WOULD BE MY PREFERENCE, JUST BECAUSE I KNOW THAT IT'S CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE DO. UM, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER CODES, CORRECT? YES. WE DO THAT WHEN WE'RE, UH, GOING THROUGH A REZONING PROCESS. THIS PROCESS IS NOT REZONING, RIGHT, BUT IT IS SETTING UP THE PROCESS FOR REZONING AND, AND FOR THAT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FOR DURING THOSE MAPS. RIGHT? TWO, TWO DIFFERENCES. TWO DIFFERENCES DIFFERENCE, RIGHT? RIGHT. BUT ONE, ONE KIND OF DRAWS A LINE OF WHAT THE, WHAT THE GROUP IS CONSIDERING. AND THEN THE SECOND PART THEN IS, UM, YOU KNOW, THE REZONING PART. SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S A TWO STEP COMPONENT AND I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THAT REQUIREMENT THERE. AT THIS POINT TOO, TO ME, THIS IS A LARGER NOTIFICATION GROUP FOR THE GLOBAL CONVERSATION OF MAPS OF ELIGIBILITY THAT WE THEN NARROW AT REZONING TO THOSE ACTUAL PROPERTIES, YOU KNOW, IMMEDIATELY IMPACTED. BUT I LIKE THAT THIS GOES LARGER TO A HALF MILE THAN THE 200 FEET. AND I LIKE THAT IT'S A LARGER GROUP THAN JUST REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOODS BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE KNOW THAT DOESN'T PICK UP ALL OF THOSE AREAS, COLLEEN. UM, WE'RE RAPIDLY APPROACHING FOUR 30 AND I PERSONALLY HAVE A LOT OF CONCERNS STILL. I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO GET THERE TODAY. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE FEELS LIKE WE'RE GONNA GET THERE TODAY. I AGREE THAT WE NEED TO GO THROUGH A LOT OF IT ITEM BY ITEM. UM, THE PLAN DOESN'T LOOK LEAVE ROOM FOR THE CURRENT REALITY, WHICH IS MOST PEOPLE DRIVE CARS. AND SO WHEN YOU'RE ELIMINATING PARKING IN REQUIRED PARKING IN AREAS, HOW, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE, YOU'RE LIMITING WHO CAN GO TAKE A JOB THERE? YOU KNOW, UM, I I I CAN'T AGREE WITH THE LACK OF PARKING. UH, IT DOES NOT ADDRESS ISSUES THAT THE CITY HAS ALREADY SEEN CREATES FRICTION IN AREAS WHERE MORE INTENSE DEVELOPMENT IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS SUCH AS NOISE AND TRAFFIC. UM, IT DOES NOT ADDRESS HOW WE ENSURE THAT ANY PORTION OF THE NEW HOUSING WILL BE AFFORDABLE OR PROVIDE A VARIETY OF HOUSING OPTION FOR FAMILIES. THERE'S INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE PERMITTED USES. FOR EXAMPLE, IT ALLOWS SOLAR FARMS AND ATHLETIC FIELDS, BOTH INDOOR AND OUTDOOR, BUT NO PARKING GARAGE. AND YET WE'RE NOT GONNA ALLOW, YOU KNOW, WE'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE STREET PARKING. IT, IT DOESN'T, IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO INCLUDE ANY NEW PARKS. UM, SO TO ME THERE'S JUST TOO MUCH. UM, I I'M NOT SURE THAT SAWS AND CPS HAVE BEEN, I, I'M NOT SURE THAT WE KNOW THAT THE SETBACKS THAT ARE PROPOSED ARE GOING TO BE ADEQUATE FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S GOING TO BE NEED TO DONE, BE DONE. AND I, I JUST DON'T SEE, I, I'VE GOT MORE AND I DON'T, I DON'T SEE US GETTING THERE TODAY. THANK YOU, BIANCA. I AGREE. I AGREE WITH SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT COLLEEN STATED. I THINK WE STILL HAVE SOME WORK TO DO TO GO THROUGH THESE. AND I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE GONNA GET TO THE OTHER BIKE PRESENTATION [03:25:01] TODAY. UM, BUT I DID HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT LIFE SAFETY ISSUES AND HOW YOU COME IN AND INTO AND OUT OF A COMMUNITY, SPECIFICALLY ALONG AN AN A RT CORRIDOR BECAUSE WE KNOW NO ONE WILL PARK ON THAT TRANSIT CORRIDOR. THEY WILL PARK ON THE ADJACENT STREETS AND HOW WE ENSURE WHAT IS BEING PRESENTED AFTER THIS MATES WELL WITH, UH, WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED HERE SPECIFICALLY WITH THE SOUTH TOWN AREA. UM, WHEN I LOOKED AT THE BIKE PLAN, UH, THAT'S BEING PRESENTED LATER, UM, IT TALKED ABOUT, UM, HAVING BARRIERS AND HAVING PROTECTED LANES FOR BICYCLISTS. AND I COMPLETELY SUPPORT THE SAFETY. HOWEVER, IN, IN THE URBAN CORE, PEOPLE ARE VERY DEPENDENT ON THAT CURB ACCESS. SPECIFICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE A SCHOOL LIKE, UM, UH, BONUM ELEMENTARY PEOPLE DO A LOT OF CURBSIDE DROP OFF. HOW THAT WILL BE AFFECTED, HOW THAT WILL AFFECT. BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS IF YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO ACCESS THE CURB, IT DISPLACES PEOPLE TO SIDE STREETS AND HOW THAT IMPACTS THE OVERALL TRAFFIC IN THOSE AREAS. THE SAME THING WITH TWAIN THAT IS ON THE SAN PEDRO CORRIDOR. I WOULD LIKE MORE TIME TO LOOK INTO THOSE PARTICULAR INSTANCES AND IF MAYBE WE COULD GO TO A SUBCOMMITTEE TO TALK ABOUT POTENTIALLY PARKING. UM, AND, AND I THINK A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED FOR THAT, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT THE MAP, BUT FOR THE MAP FOR THE CESAR CHAVEZ SOUTH, KNOWING THAT THAT AREA IS ALREADY STRESSED WITH, ITS ON STREET AMENITIES. UM, AND I, UNLESS YOU WANNA GO INTO THE ACREAGE ON THE SIZE OF THE PARCEL, YOU KNOW, I, I APPRECIATE, UM, KAT'S COMMENTS ABOUT THE ANNEXATION, BUT THERE'S A TRUE ISSUE WITH PROPERTIES WHICH CATCH FIRE UNEXPECTEDLY ON THE EAST SIDE AND ON THE WEST SIDE. AND PEOPLE ARE USING THESE OPPORTUNITIES TO AGGREGATE PROPERTIES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. AND SO IN A PARTICULAR AREA LIKE FIVE POINTS, WHICH HAS THE TOD ON SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES, THERE'S THREE PROPERTIES IN A ROW, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF 'EM HAS BURNED. YOU KNOW, AND SO THERE'S OBVIOUSLY CONCERN ABOUT WHY HAVING TAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE AND HOW WE NEED TO ADDRESS LANGUAGE IN DOING SO. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW HOW MUCH LATER WE WERE GONNA GO PAST FOUR 30 TODAY. UM, I, AND, AND I THINK THESE ARE, THESE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL, UM, AREAS THAT WARRANT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND CONCERNS. AND I KNOW WE CAN'T COMMENT ON THE MAPS, BUT I THINK THAT THERE WAS A LOT OF APPLICABILITY LANGUAGE THAT WAS DEVELOPED, UM, AND UTILIZED BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE TO DEVELOP THE MAP, BUT YET THAT WAS REMOVED. AND SO IT WAS BECAUSE THEY WERE ADOPTING THE MAP WITH THE BLUE LINES AND THE BOUNDARIES AND WHERE THEY'RE AT. THAT'S WHY YOU HEAR A LOT OF ADVOCACY FOR THOSE, THOSE BOUNDARIES AS THEY EXIST. UM, YOU KNOW, ARE IS CERTAIN AREAS, UH, APPROPRIATE FOR THAT. UM, THOSE WERE THE KEY THINGS. AND SO I WAS GONNA MAKE A MOTION THAT WE SEND THIS TO SUBCOMMITTEE TO EVALUATE PARKING, TO EVALUATE THE ACREAGE CONCERN, TO EVALUATE THE USE TABLE THAT COLLEEN BROUGHT UP WITH THE CONFLICTS WITH USES. AND THEN I'M OPEN TO ANYTHING ELSE, EMERGENCY SERVICES, A ACCESS, UM, AND THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. THANK YOU. OKAY. UH, YA YOU HAVE SOME QUESTIONS? UH, SO I WANTED TO COMMENT ON TWO THINGS. SO FIRST WITH THE PARKING, I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE WITH WHAT THAT MEANS. SO REMOVING THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS DOESN'T MEAN THERE'S ONLY STREET PARKING. IT JUST MEANS THE CITY ISN'T GOING TO USE THEIR 1965 CODE, UM, IN WHAT, 2024? IT MEANS THAT PEOPLE CAN NOW USE MORE UP-TO-DATE KNOWLEDGE ON LIKE HOW MUCH PARKING IS NEEDED AND APPLY THAT. LIKE RESTAURANTS WILL STILL WANNA MAKE MONEY. THEY'RE GONNA PUT HOW MUCH PARKING THEY THINK THEY NEED TO MAKE MONEY AND RUN THEIR BUSINESS. SAME WITH PEOPLE MAKING HOUSING. IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO APPLY IN 1965 CODE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS. UM, AND THEN SECOND, I ATTENDED A LOT OF THE TASK FORCE MEETINGS AND THEY WERE ALL OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. AND I KNOW THE TASK FORCE STAYED FOR SOMETIMES AN HOUR OVER WHAT, YOU KNOW, THEY WERE SCHEDULED FOR TO LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. SO, UM, THERE WAS DEFINITELY ENOUGH TIME FOR PEOPLE TO BE AWARE OF THE MEETINGS AND ATTEND THE MEETINGS AND GIVE THEIR FEEDBACK. I KNOW SOME OF THE MEETINGS HAD OVER 20, 25 PEOPLE, UM, COMMENTING. SO I JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE. THANK YOU, MICHAEL. YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION. THERE WE GO. UM, THE DWELLING UNITS PER PLATTED LOT, I, I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT DENSITY IS ALLOWED HERE. SO IT'S GONNA BE IN THE TABLE. SO THAT SAME TABLE SAYS, UM, ONLY ONE OF THOSE DISTRICTS IS GONNA HAVE A LIMITATION ON, UH, THE DENSITY, UH, PER PLATTED LOT. AND THAT'S FOR THE, UH, TRANSITION DISTRICT ITSELF. THE OTHER TWO DISTRICTS, UH, DON'T HAVE THAT LIMITATION. SO IT'S FIVE UNITS MAX ON A, ON A TRANSITION DISTRICT. OKAY. SO THE DASH IS UNLIMITED, IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. [03:30:01] OKAY, GREAT. ONE OTHER THING I JUST, I WANTED TO SECOND WHAT YOU SAID, UM, ABOUT THE PARKING. UM, YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALL KINDS OF OTHER CHECKS AND BALANCES WHEN IT COMES TO PARKING. UM, SO I WORK FOR THE DEVELOPER OF PEARL PER OUR ZONING. WE HAVE, WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ZERO PARKING SPACES. WE HAVE BUILT OVER 2000 BECAUSE IF WE HAD ZERO PARKING, NOBODY WOULD SHOW UP. SO IT, IT'S NOT LIKE, HEY, ALL OF A SUDDEN ALL THESE DEVELOPMENTS ARE GONNA ADD ZERO PARKING SPACES. UM, YOU KNOW, THEY, THEY HAVE TO GET A LENDER WHO'S GONNA AGREE TO GIVE 'EM MONEY, WHO IS GONNA TAKE IT OVER IF THEY DEFAULT ON IT, THEY'RE GONNA WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THEY CAN FILL IT WITH SOMEBODY WHO'S GONNA PAY RENT TO LIVE THERE, TO WORK THERE. UM, SO IT, IT'S, IT'S NOT LIKE THIS IS ALL OF A SUDDEN GONNA BE A HUGE STREET PARKING PROBLEM. YOU WILL STILL SEE, UM, A LOT OF PARKING BEING BUILT BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE GONNA HAVE TO LEASE OUT WHATEVER THEY'RE BUILDING. SHERIFF, I MAY, I AM ALSO HERE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS FOR THOSE THAT HAVE QUESTIONS, SO I CAN ANSWER THOSE DIRECT QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW, ESPECIALLY WITH WHAT COLLEEN HAD. OKAY. THANK YOU MR. HANLEY? YES. UH, I'M, I AM I'M CURIOUS OF THE TIMELINE. KAT, UH, OBVIOUSLY, UH, BIANCA AND COLLEEN HAD MADE A GOOD POINT ABOUT THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED, BUT I KNOW THAT THIS IS A BYPRODUCT OF A CCR, I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT, SIR. AND SO WHAT IS THE COUNCIL, UH, DICTATING? SO TO GIVE US AN IDEA OF HOW WE CAN ADDRESS THESE THINGS AS A ORGANIZATION OR, OR A COMMITTEE TO DO THAT ONE. THE SECOND ONE IS I SAW THE PRESENTATION ON THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN LAST WEEK, UM, AT THE MPO AND UH, THEY'RE ALSO ON A TIGHT TIMELINE, SO WE STILL NEED TO GET THEM PRESENTED HERE. I KNOW IT'S INFORMATION ITEM, SO I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT HOW MUCH TIME WE HAVE TO GET THESE, UH, ITEMS AGENDA IZED AND THEN DISCUSSED. SURE. SO, UM, AGAIN, WE STARTED THIS PROCESS BACK IN FEBRUARY WITH THE TASK FORCE, AS WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, UM, THEY, UH, REALLY DUG INTO THE CODE OVER SIX MONTHS. UM, AS YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH, WITH OTHER UDC AMENDMENTS, UM, IT'S TYPICALLY NOT THAT LONG TO GO OVER UDC LANGUAGE. SIX MONTHS IS QUITE A LONG TIME, UM, TO DO THAT, THAT DEEP DIVE, THAT DIG IN. UM, AND IN THE LAST TWO MEETINGS, UH, BECAUSE WE HAD, UM, UH, LOTS OF LISTENING SESSIONS TO, TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CONCERNS ARE RELATED TO INCOMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT, UH, WE WERE ABLE TO, UH, BRING FORWARD THE, UH, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS THAT YOU SEE HERE TODAY. UM, SO YES, O OVER SIX MONTHS GOING OVER THAT LANGUAGE OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. THE GOAL IS FOR THIS ONE TO GET TO, UH, COUNCIL BY THE END OF THE YEAR, UH, DECEMBER. SO, UH, WE STILL HAVE TWO MONTHS OF ENGAGEMENT, ESPECIALLY ON THE MAPS. UM, RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT, AT THE CODE LANGUAGE. 'CAUSE AGAIN, WE, WE HAVE A TOD CODE IN PLACE TODAY. AND, AND THE CONCERN IS THAT WITHOUT THOSE GUARDRAILS OR LIMITATIONS, YOU'RE GONNA START SEEING AN INFLUX OF APPLICATIONS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE GONNA SEE THAT, OH, UH, THERE'S A CURRENT TOD IN PLACE TODAY. ALRIGHT, THEN I'M GONNA APPLY FOR IT BECAUSE I HAVE PROPERTY ALONG, UH, THESE ART LINES. AND SO WE WANNA START TO PUT THOSE GUARDRAILS IN PLACE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. UH, SO, UM, THAT, THAT'S WHY, AND AGAIN, THIS IS A PROCESS FOR THIS FIRST PHASE IS, IS, IS GONNA BE 11 MONTHS, UM, FOR, FOR THIS PHASE TO OCCUR. AND THEN, UM, AFTER THAT IS THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. BUT AGAIN, NONE OF THESE PHASES INCLUDES REZONING OF ANY PROPERTIES. IT'S JUST LIMITING IT FROM OVER 300 SQUARE MILES TO A LITTLE OVER THREE SQUARE MILES. UM, AND I KNOW COLLEEN HAD MENTIONED THAT NO PARKS WOULD BE PERMITTED. ACTUALLY IT'S IN IT, IT'S IN THE, UH, PROPOSED DOCUMENT THAT PARKS WOULD BE PERMITTED BY WRIGHT. SO WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT PARKS IS A USE IS PERMITTED BY WRIGHT, BUT WHAT THE CONCERN THAT THE TASK FORCE HAD WAS THAT CITY CURRENTLY CITY OWNED PARKS OR, OR, OR PARKS THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE TO REZONE TO TOD. BUT PARKS ARE STILL PERMITTED BY WRIGHT. I, I UNDERSTAND. RIGHT. OKAY. THANKS CAT. MR. SIPES, I HAD A QUESTION AND THEN A COMMENT. UM, AND, AND THE, THE QUESTION IS ON THE TODD DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED THE TYPES THAT WE HAVE, WE'VE GOT YOUR TODD MIXED, YOUR TODD HYBRID AND YOU'RE TODD TRANSITIONAL. AND THE WAY I READ IT, IF YOU'RE ADJACENT TO A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THEN THE ONLY ONE THAT WOULD APPLY WOULD BE THE TODD TRANSITIONAL. IS THAT CORRECT? IT THAT WOULD BE, IT SERVES AS A TRANSITION. TYPICALLY, THINK ABOUT YOUR CURRENT TRADITIONAL, UH, DISTRICTS, RIGHT? YOU START OFF WITH SINGLE FAMILY, UH, DISTRICTS AND YOU HAVE DIFFERENT VARIATIONS FROM A LARGE LOT TO A SMALLER LOT. [03:35:01] AND THEN YOU, UH, START WITH THE MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICTS. AND THEN AS YOU, UH, AS YOU PROGRESS YOU IN, YOU INCREASE IN YOUR INTENSITY, MULTI-FAMILY LIKE COMMERCIAL, UH, MEDIUM COMMERCIAL, HEAVIER COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, UM, TRANSITION DISTRICTS AND EMX DISTRICTS CAN WORK SIMILARLY TOGETHER. SO YOU CAN EITHER HAVE, UH, LET'S SAY YOU ARE, YOU HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THREE LOTS IN DEEP, UH, ON FROM THE CORRIDOR. UH, YOUR SECOND LOT COULD BE A TRANSITION DISTRICT ALLOWING FOR HIGHER DENSITY AND THEN YOUR, UH, YOUR, THE FIRST LOT IN, WHICH IS THE ONE AT THE CORRIDOR. IT COULD BE YOUR MIXED USE DISTRICT, BUT YOU COULD STILL DO AN MX ADJACENT OR A BUDDING A SINGLE FAMILY BECAUSE YOU HAVE DIFFERENT, UH, INTENSITIES OF HEIGHT. SO AGAIN, YOU STILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE HEIGHT STANDARDS THAT SAY IF YOU'RE WITHIN 50 FEET OF A SINGLE FAMILY, UH, ZONED PROPERTY, YOU HAVE TO MEET THE SAME HEIGHT FOR THE FIRST 50 FEET THAT THEY HAVE. THEN YOU CAN INCREASE THAT HEIGHT. SO IF THEY REQUESTED THE MX THREE, THE MAX STORIES THEY COULD GO WOULD BE THREE STORIES, AS LONG AS THEY COMPLIED WITH THE FIRST 50 FEET OF THAT SINGLE FAMILY USE. SO YOU COULD HAVE EITHER ONE, BUT YOU STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE REZONING PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHICH ONE. OKAY. AND I GUESS, I GUESS BECAUSE MY CONCERN IS THAT ON THE, UH, DESIGN REGULATIONS, IF YOU DID A, IF YOU CHOSE TO GO FOR A TODD MIXED OR A TODD HYBRID, YOU COULD, THAT ELIMINATES ANY OF THE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THE, THE TABLE ACTUALLY SAYS IF YOU'RE, IF YOU GO TO THE TABLE WHERE IT TALKS ABOUT SETBACKS MM-HMM , IT SAYS THAT A FIVE FOOT SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED TO BUDDING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USER ZONE. AND FOR THE REAR, YOU STILL HAVE A 10 FOOT REAR SETBACK THAT IS REQUIRED TO BUDDING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USER ZONE. SO IT WOULD WORK VERY MUCH LIKE OUR CURRENT DISTRICTS TODAY. SO IF YOU'RE A BUDDING IT, YOU HAVE TO, THAT'S NOT WHAT I SEE THOUGH ON, AM I JUST READING THIS WRONG? THAT ON I SEE ZERO FEET. IF IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT, UH, THAT MIGHT BE FOR THE, THE SIDE. YEAH, RIGHT THERE, THE SIDE AND, AND ON THE REAR. RIGHT. BUT THERE'S A NOTE. THERE'S A NOTE. SO SIMILAR TO HOW OUR, OUR TABLE THREE 10 WORKS TODAY, THERE, THOSE ARE THE NOTES. SO YOU HAVE TO COMPLY IF YOU'RE WITHIN A, IF YOU'RE NEXT TO A SINGLE FAMILY USE. OKAY, THAT MAKES SENSE. I READ IT WRONG, I THINK. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. AND THEN THE ONLY COMMENT I HAD WAS REGARDING THE PARKING. UM, AND I UNDERSTAND AT, AT THE PEARL, UM, HOWEVER, ON ZONING WE HAVE SEEN MANY TIMES WHERE WE'VE HAD REZONING ON, UH, THE ST. MARY'S STRIP WHERE THE CONCERN WAS THAT NO PARKING WAS GOING TO BE PROVIDED. SO I MEAN, YES, I, I KNOW THAT MOST I AGREE MOST, UM, ESTABL ESTABLISHMENTS WOULD PROVIDE PARKING, BUT I THINK THAT THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY WHERE SOME WOULD CHOOSE NOT TO. IF I COULD ALSO PROVIDE SOME CLARIFICATION, THE, THE REASON WHY THIS IS UNIQUE AND BEING PROPOSED FOR TOD IS BECAUSE REMEMBER THERE THE, THE T STANDS FOR TRANSIT. SO WHAT DOESN'T EXIST TODAY IS WHAT WE ARE BUILDING FOR TOMORROW, WHICH IS A TRANSIT LINE THAT HAS HIGHER FREQUENCY TO GET PEOPLE FURTHER AND FARTHER THAN, THAN BEFORE. RIGHT NOW, THE FREQUENCY FOR VIA UM, LINES IS 30 MINUTES. SO PEOPLE AREN'T USING THEM BECAUSE IT TAKES TOO LONG TO GET TO THE NEXT BUS. WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS A 10 MINUTE FREQUENCY, ESPECIALLY DURING THE WEEKDAY AND, UM, 15, UM, MINUTE FREQUENCY ON THE WEEKENDS. SO IF SOMEONE HAS THAT FREQUENCY, THEN THEY HAVE AN OPTION IN WHICH THEY CAN UTILIZE THAT TRANSIT THAT THEY DON'T REALLY THINK IS A GOOD OPTION FOR THEM TODAY. SO IF THEY'RE USING THAT OPTION FOR TRANSIT, THEN THE NEED FOR A SINGLE UH, OCCUPANCY VEHICLE IS ISN'T NECESSARY FOR THAT PERSON WHO'S, WHO'S CHOOSING IT BY OPTION. MR. ESTRADA, THANK YOU CHAIR. UM, I WOULD LIKE TO, UM, SECOND WHAT BIANCA HAD MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY ON THE SUBCOMMITTEE TO IRON OUT. THERE'S, THERE'S LOTS OF ISSUES THAT DO NEED TO BE IRONED OUT AND I'M IN AGREEMENT, YOU KNOW, THAT WE NEED TO TAKE, UH, A LITTLE MORE TIME AND, AND GOING THROUGH THE WEEDS AND MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE TRY TO GET THIS RIGHT AS BEST AS POSSIBLE. I'M READY. THOSE ANSWERED THOSE QUESTIONS TODAY, CHAIR. OKAY. YEAH, I JUST HAD A QUESTION. UM, SO I KNOW THE TOD ZONING WOULDN'T BE APPLIED UNLESS YOU GO THROUGH REZONING. UM, I, I WOULD SAY MOST DEVELOPMENT THEY WOULD PREFER NOT TO REZONE. UM, IS THERE A SENSE OF HOW COMMON WE MIGHT EXPECT DEVELOPMENT ALONG THIS QUARTER TO ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE TOD PROCESS OR T THE REZONING PROCESS FOR DOD HAS THAT BEEN LOOKED AT JUST BASED OFF OF OTHER CITIES OR PREVIOUS REZONING TO TOD THAT IT CURRENTLY IS IN EFFECT, RIGHT? YOU'RE, YOU'RE RIGHT. OTHER CITIES HAVE GONE THROUGH A PROCESS OF APPLYING THAT ZONING THROUGH A REZONING PROCESS AS PART OF A UPDATE TO A CODE. THIS PROCESS DOES NOT INCLUDE THAT. I DON'T, I DON'T HAVE A CCR THAT SAYS ONCE [03:40:01] YOU'VE UPDATED THE CODE, THEN YOU REZONE PROPERTIES. SO UNTIL THAT HAPPENS, THIS PROCESS DOES NOT INCLUDE A REZONING. BUT OTHER CITIES HAVE DONE THAT. YES. RIGHT. SO MAYBE IT'S NOT EXPECTED THAT TOD WOULD BE APPLIED THROUGHOUT THIS CORRIDOR, EVEN WHEN THE GREEN LINE GOES IN, IT STILL WOULD BE KIND OF A ONE-OFF REZONING. CORRECT. OKAY. BIANCA? YEAH, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT IT'S NOT ABOUT THE ELIMINATION OF PARKING ALTOGETHER. IT'S ABOUT A BALANCE. AND I THINK THAT'S THE DISCUSSION POINT BECAUSE WE'RE, THERE'S ONE DISTRICT THAT HAS 50% AND THE OTHER TWO HAVE ZERO. AND SO TO YOUR WHOLE POINT, DEVELOPERS WANT PEOPLE TO COME TO THEIR BUSINESS. THEY NEED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE, UH, DELIVERIES COME. WE KNOW HOW OFTEN UBER EATS AND AMAZON ARE DELIVERING TO PROPERTIES, UM, JUST OUT ON A NORMAL BASIS. ALL OF THAT TOGETHER WASN'T DISCUSSED AT THE TASK FORCE. AND THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO SPEND A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME AND LOOK AT IT AND ALSO MIRROR THE BIKE MASTER PLAN AND WHAT'S GOING ON SPECIFICALLY ALONG THAT CORRIDOR. AND LOOK AT THE WIDTH OF THE STREET. THERE WERE, WE HAVE SOME OF THE NARROWEST STREETS IN THE URBAN CORE. AND RIGHT NOW, I MEAN EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD, JUST LIKE MINE HAS A COMMUNITY PLAN, BUT UNFORTUNATELY THEY DON'T ALL GET IMPLEMENTED. AND IN THOSE COMMUNITY PLANS THAT ASK THE CITY TO LOOK AT ACCESSIBILITY FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES COMING IN, UH, INTO AND OUT OF YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND ARE THESE STREETS AVAILABLE FOR ON STREET PARKING ON BOTH SIDES? I THINK, YOU KNOW, UNLESS THE CITY COMES IN AND HOLISTICALLY PUTS PARKING RESTRICTIONS OR DOES A RESIDENT PARKING PROGRAM IN THESE AREAS THAT ARE EXTREMELY SENSITIVE, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING THAT'S GONNA TRAGICALLY HAPPEN. AND TO BE HONEST, WHAT'S THE RUSH? WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO TAKE THE TIME TO LOOK AT THIS AND I THINK THERE'S BEEN COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE PUBLIC THAT RAISE THAT AS A CONCERN. SPECIFICALLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT SOUTH TOWN, LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE THE ONLY AREA THAT HAS THOSE RESIDENT PERMIT PARKING PROGRAMS. AND I WOULD THINK MS. HERNANDEZ WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE OF OUR DOING OUR DUE DILIGENCE. AND THAT'S THE ONLY REASON I LOOK AT THE QAP FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THEY'RE STILL REQUIRING 1.5 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT THAT'S NOT CHANGING OR BEING PROPOSED FOR 2025. THAT'S WHAT WHAT'S IN EXISTENCE RIGHT NOW FOR 2024. BUT JUST AS THEY STARTED OFF IN THE TASK FORCE, NOBODY TALKED ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THEY MENTIONED IT, BUT THEN THEY TALKED ABOUT ATTAINABLE HOUSING. SO WE'RE NOT REALLY TALKING ABOUT 60% A MI, UNFORTUNATELY, I LOVE IF WE WOULD HAVE SOME LAND USE RESTRICTIONS THAT COULD TRULY BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT THIS IS MARKET RATE HOUSING. AND I THINK WE NEED TO ENSURE THAT WE DO JUSTICE BECAUSE WE CAN LEARN FROM HISTORY AND NOT LET HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF. THERE'S SOME GREAT EXAMPLES WHEN YOU GO DOWN ON AVIOS LOSS AND YOU LOOK AT ALL THE STRESSORS THAT OCCUR WITH BEING ABLE TO ACCESS BUSINESSES AND PEOPLE TO GET DELIVERIES AND RESIDENTS TO BE ABLE TO PARK AND FOR THEIR GUESTS TO COME. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE IN THOSE AREAS. AND THAT'S THE REASON I RECOMMEND IT GO TO A, TO A SUBCOMMITTEE. I'M NOT LOOKING AT, AT ELIMINATING OR MAKING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT BACK TO THE 1960 STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND THE TRANSITION, BUT TO GO FROM, YOU KNOW, WHERE IT IS TODAY TO NOTHING, I THINK YOU MADE YOUR POINT THAT YOU PROBABLY, WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT GONNA DO THE PARKING, BUT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE WILLING TO DO THAT. AND I'M SO THANKFUL THE PEARL HAS DONE IT BECAUSE THAT'S MADE ITS DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSFUL. BUT DRIVE UP AND DOWN BROADWAY AND LOOK AT THE STRESSORS IN THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH ON STREETE PARKING AND WITH WISA STREETS. I WISH THERE WAS SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED THE WIDTH OF OUR EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. AND MAYBE WE ONLY DO IT INSIDE THE CRACK, MAYBE WE LOOK AT CERTAIN AREAS, BUT NOBODY TALKED ABOUT WISA STREETS. NOBODY TALKED ABOUT EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AT THE TASK FORCE. IT WAS A PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WAS MADE, I'M SORRY, ALL TOO OFTEN I'VE SEEN, UM, A FIRE TRUCK AND AN EMS VEHICLE BACK UP 'CAUSE THEY CAN'T GET DOWN THE STREET AND I DON'T EVEN LIVE IN SOUTH TOWN. AND SO I THINK THAT'S, THAT'S THE KEY POINT FOR ME IS THAT THEY, THEY ALREADY HAVE A, A A CHALLENGE THAT EXISTS AND WE SHOULDN'T MAKE IT WORSE. SO HOW CAN WE HELP THEM PROTECT THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE THAT THEY HAVE TODAY? UNLESS YOU WANT TO GET INTO IT. NOW WE'RE WILLING TO CALL DOWN AND START TALKING ABOUT THE WISS OF THE STREETS, BUT I WANTED TO, UH, COME IN WITH SOME PROPOSALS TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT, UH, FROM A GENERALITIES PERSPECTIVE AND ALSO BUILD UPON THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM THAT EXISTS. THE CITY PARKING OFFICIAL, UH, CAN INITIATE THAT AT THE SAME TIME WHEN A TOD IS IS EVALUATED, BECAUSE YES, TO YOUR WHOLE POINT, ONCE THIS IS CREATED, IT COULD GO PARCEL BY PARCEL, BUT COULD ALSO GO AS A LARGE AREA REZONING. AND THAT WE DON'T KNOW IF THAT WILL HAPPEN. THAT'S AN UNKNOWN AND IT'S A TOOL THAT'S AVAILABLE TO THE CITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION, BUT THEY'RE NOT SAYING, NO, THAT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN EITHER. YOU KNOW, THAT'S, IT'S, IT'S JUST AVAILABLE. AND SO I THINK HOLISTICALLY, IF WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS PEOPLE'S CONCERNS, I THINK THAT'S WHAT I'M HERE TO DO BECAUSE I REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY AND I THINK ALL OF US WANNA DO [03:45:01] THAT. CHAIR PECK AS A QUICK CLARIFICATION FOR WHAT, UM, THE PT A C CAN DO HERE AS A FUNCTION OF THE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THEIR TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. UM, ALL ACTIONS NEED TO BE IN THE FORM OF A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO A, A MOTION TO RECOMMEND IT TO GO TO A DIFFERENT COMMITTEE WOULD BE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TAKE THAT ACTION. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING MR. HANLEY. A COUPLE ITEMS REAL QUICK. CHAIRMAN, UH, BIANCA, UH, IN THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN PROPOSAL, THEY'RE PROPOSING FOUR ALTERNATIVES FOR, UM, BIKING. IT'S SEPARATED IT'S STRIPES, ET CETERA LIKE THIS. SO, UH, I THINK THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO ADDRESS SOME OF YOUR ISSUES ABOUT PARKING ON THAT. SO THERE ARE OPTIONS IN THE, THE PROPOSED BICYCLE MASTER PLAN. THE OTHER THING THAT, THAT I WANTED TO, TO NOTE IS THAT, UH, I'M TRYING TO, UH, CHANNEL, UM, UH, ASHLEY FAIRMAN AND A COUPLE OTHER QUESTIONS THAT SHE HAD, UH, ON THE, UH, THAT SHE BROUGHT TO MY POINT AND HAS TO DO WITH THE, UH, UH, KAT, UH, CAT, UH, TABLE 3 42 0.0 2.1, AND IT HAD TO DO WITH JUST AN UNDERSTANDING OF A TOD MX FOR THOSE THAT HAVE WORKED AROUND IN THE CITY FOR MANY YEARS. WE UNDERSTAND WHAT MX IS, IT'S MIXED USE. SO THE QUESTION COMES UP FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION. TOD MX DISTRICTS ARE CONSIDERED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES. WELL, A MIXED USE IS RESIDENTIAL OFFICE RETAIL. SO THE, SO THAT'S UNSURE. OH, YOU WANT ME TO, YOU WANT ME TO, UH, CLARIFY WHAT THAT MEANS? SO RIGHT NOW IN OUR OVERLAY DISTRICTS, UM, LIKE NCDS UH, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICTS, THEY HAVE THEIR, UH, STANDARDS THAT ARE, UM, UH, DIVIDED BY NON-RESIDENTIAL VERSUS RESIDENTIAL USES. SO THE REASON WHY THIS STATEMENT WAS ADDED IN THERE IS SO THAT WAY THEY KNEW THAT IF THEY HAD A TOD MX THREE DISTRICT IN AN NCD SIX THAT, UM, THAT USE THAT TOD MX WOULD BE CONSIDERED NON-RESIDENTIAL. SO THEY HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS IN THAT NCD. SO IT'S NOT ABOUT THE USE OF THE BUILDING, IT'S JUST ABOUT WHAT, WHAT STANDARDS DO THEY HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT NCD. SO THEN, UH, KAT, THAT ALSO APPLIES TO THE T-O-D-H-I. CORRECT. OKAY. AND THE LAST QUESTION ON THAT ONE IS, UH, UNDER THE THING THAT SAYS TRANSIT, UH, TRADITION DISTRICTS, IT SAYS BUILDINGS ARE BUILT AT A HOUSE SCALE. SO, UH, GO, SOMETHING THAT MR. SNIPES SAID EARLIER IS THAT'S A DESIGN CRITERIA. SO WHAT'S THE HOUSE SCALE? WHAT'S RELATIVE IN ONE NEIGHBORHOOD MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN ANOTHER. SO THERE CORRECT NEEDS SOME CLARIFICATION OF SOME SORT OF HOW IT IS. AND THE LAST COMMENT THAT I HAD IS, UH, BROOKINGS INSTITUTE'S GOT A WONDERFUL ARTICLE ON TODS. THERE ARE PLUSES AND THERE ARE ALL MINUSES, AND THEY GO INTO GREAT DETAIL OF THOSE. AND AS YOU WELL KNOW, WHENEVER YOU HAVE A CHANGE, THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT GONNA LIKE TO CHANGE AND THEY'RE GONNA PEOPLE THAT LOVE IT. SO AT THE END OF THE DAY, AND I THINK BIANCA ALWAYS ADDRESSES THIS, WHAT'S RIGHT AND WHAT'S FAIR, AND THAT'S WHAT THE GOAL OF THIS, UH, PC T SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR. YES, SIR. UH, MR. CHAIR, UH, QUESTIONS AND ONE COMMENT, UM, SOMEONE PROCESS AND TIMING, UH, ONE, AS I REMEMBER, WE HAD, UM, A SUBCOMMITTEE A COUPLE OF TIMES, UH, WHEN WE WERE REVIEWING THE UDC, AND I'M WONDERING IF MAYBE IN THE FORM OF A SUBCOMMITTEE WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO, UH, RECONSIDER SOME OF THIS, UH, TO MS. MALDONADO'S POINT. BUT, UH, BEYOND THAT, I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT ALL THREE OF THE PREVIOUS TODS WERE SINCE 2001. UH, PERHAPS MS. HERANDEZ CAN REMIND US OF THOSE AND ABOUT WHEN THEY CAME ONLINE. AND ANY OTHER IMPORTANT, UM, DETAILS RELATED TO THOSE, WHETHER IT'S LESSONS LEARNED, UH, HELPFUL OR, OR CHALLENGING, AND ABOUT HOW LONG IT TOOK FROM THEIR INITIAL APPLICATION TO THEIR REALIZATION. SURE. SO THE FIRST TO D ZONING DISTRICTS WERE ON PETCO ROAD GOING TOWARDS 1 51. UM, I WANNA SAY IT WAS PROBABLY JUST BEFORE THE PANDEMIC HIT ONE CASE, UM, HIT FIRST AND THEN THE SECOND CASE. UM, AND SO IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT NOW. UM, YOU'LL, YOU'LL SEE THAT IF YOU DRIVE BY PETRANKO HEADING TOWARDS, UM, 1 51 AND YOU'RE GONNA SEE IT ON YOUR RIGHT HAND, RIGHT HAND SIDE. UM, IT, IT'S GONNA LOOK LIKE A, UH, LIKE A, LIKE I SAID EARLIER, A TYPICAL MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY DISTRICT. SO IT'S GONNA HAVE A MIXTURE OF USES. UM, THEY'RE BUILDING A TRANSIT CENTER THERE SO THAT WAY THEY, PEOPLE CAN TAKE THE BUS ALONG THAT PETCO ROAD TO GET TO INGRAM, TO THE INGRAM TRANSIT CENTER. BUT THEY WERE ABLE TO TAKE IT FROM INGRAM TRANSIT CENTER TO THAT, TO THAT LOCATION. THE LAST CASE JUST HAPPENED, UM, IN JUNE. THAT WAS REZONED. I WANNA SAY IT WAS ON THE, UH, DISTRICT FOUR AND I THINK IT WAS MAYBE OFF OF PALO ALTO ROAD. [03:50:02] SHE WAS GONNA LOOK FOR IT, BUT IT JUST HAPPENED RECENTLY. YEAH. AND ALSO IN TERMS OF A PROCESS, UM, WELL CIRCLING BACK, WERE THERE, WERE THERE ANY LESSONS LEARNED FROM THOSE PROCESSES THAT HAVE INFORMED THE DISCUSSIONS FOR THE TASK FORCE OR INTERNALLY? UH, BUT BUT IN TERMS OF PROCESS, COULD YOU REMIND US ALL, THERE WERE SOME HINTS ABOUT WHETHER THE CCR WOULD EXP EXPIRE AT THE END OF DECEMBER, AND IF THAT WERE TO BE THE CASE, WOULD THE, UH, ONLY NECESSARY THING IN JANUARY BE FOR CITY COUNCIL TO ISSUE A NEW CCR TO REVIVE THE PROCESS MOVING FORWARD IF WE WERE TO TAKE MORE TIME? NO, THERE'S NOT AN EXPIRATION ON, ON THE CCR. IT'S JUST A, A MATTER OF MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE A CODE IN PLACE, UH, BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. UH, BECAUSE THEN PEOPLE START TO SEE THAT ACTIVITY AND GO, OH, OKAY, WHAT, WHAT ZONING CODES DO I HAVE AVAILABLE NOW? SO WE'RE TRYING TO PUT IN THE GUARDRAILS NOW, THE RESTRICTIONS, NOW THE LIMITATIONS NOW. UM, BUT AGAIN, IT'S JUST UP UPDATING THE CODE DOESN'T APPLY ZONING WE'RE TRYING AND WE'RE TRYING TO NARROW WHERE IT CURRENTLY IS APPLIED, IF YOU SAW, SAW ON THAT MAP EARLIER. UM, SO AGAIN, THE GOAL IS TO GET TO DECEMBER BY, I MEAN, GET TO COUNCIL BY DECEMBER WITH JUST THE UPDATED CODE IN THE ADOPTION OF THE POLICY FRAMEWORK. SO THEN WE CAN BEGIN PHASE TWO WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. WERE, WERE THERE LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PREVIOUS, THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM, FROM THIS PROCESS? UM, SO THERE WAS BOTH THE TASK FORCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE, A LOT OF MEMBERS THAT WERE IN INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS. UM, THE, IT'S HARD TO SAY WHAT, UM, WHAT I WOULD DO DIFFERENTLY. UM, I WILL SAY THAT SOME OF THE, MAYBE SOME OF THE COUNCIL OFFICES WANTED TO APPOINT MEMBERS VERSUS, UM, THEM BEING THE, THE, THE SAMPLE SIZE. UM, AND UH, THAT WAS SOME THINGS THAT WE HAD HEARD FROM, FROM COUNCIL OFFICES. BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I MEAN, WITH EIGHT MONTHS AND OVER 50 PEOPLE INVOLVED AND, YOU KNOW, STILL GOING THROUGH TWO MORE MONTHS, UH, OF INPUT, IT'S, YEAH. THANK YOU. AND THEN MY FINAL COMMENT, UH, I RESPECT THE, UH, TIME TO THE TASK FORCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE I'VE ALREADY PUT INTO THIS AT THE SAME TIME, UM, AND RESPECT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN HERE AND WHO'VE SHARED THEIR COMMENTS, IT, I WOULD LIKE TO JOIN MY OTHER THREE COLLEAGUES WHO'VE ALREADY EXPRESSED THOUGHTS THAT WE NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO DIGEST AND RUMINATE ON THIS AND, UH, TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EVERYTHING WE'VE HEARD TODAY. SO ALONG THOSE LINES, UM, YOU KNOW, FIRST OF ALL, WE HAD A TASK FORCE THAT SPENT THE BETTER PART OF A YEAR GOING THROUGH THIS AND GETTING THIS WRITTEN, GETTING THESE CODE AMENDMENTS PUT TOGETHER, CREATING SOME DRAFT MAPS, UM, AND CREATING THIS PROCESS THAT WE'RE REVIEWING. YOU KNOW, I FEEL A LITTLE REMISS BEING, YOU KNOW, ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE ASSUMING THAT WE KNOW THIS BETTER THAN THEY DO, AND WE'VE ONLY BEEN LOOKING AT IT FOR A COUPLE OF HOURS. UM, THEY, THEY PUT SOME BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS INTO THAT AND, AND THEY ARE THE EXPERTS, NOT US. TO ME, THE WORK HAS BEEN DONE. UM, AND IF, IF THIS, IF THIS COMMITTEE DECIDES IT HAS TO GO BACK TO A SUBCOMMITTEE, OBVIOUSLY IT'S GONNA BE VOTED ON. THAT'S THE SUBCOMMITTEE IT SHOULD GO TO, NOT A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THIS BODY. 'CAUSE THEY'RE THE ONES THAT PUT IT TOGETHER. SO THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. COLLEEN, I JUST WANT TO SAY I AM NOT OPPOSED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A-T-O-D-I, I DON'T WANNA STICK TO THE PARKING STANDARDS THAT HAVE BEEN IN EXISTENCE SINCE 1964. I THINK THERE'S JUST SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN. I REALIZE THAT NOT ALL OF MY CONCERNS ARE NECESSARILY SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE PUT IN THE ORDINANCE. I STILL THINK THE QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ASKED AND CONSIDERATION NEED TO BE MADE AND THAT WE KNOW NOT RUSH THROUGH THIS, THE PROCESS. AND THAT BEING SAID, I DO HAVE TO LEAVE. THANK YOU. UH, JAY, I THINK YOU ALREADY HANDED IT FIRST. YEAH, I MEAN, TO SENDING IT TO A SUBCOMMITTEE, I MEAN, THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT THE TASK FORCE WAS, WAS A SUBCOMMITTEE. THEY SPENT MONTHS NEGOTIATING. I WAS THERE AS WELL, KIND OF LISTENING TO ALL THE COMMENTS AT THAT TIME AS WELL. MOST OF THE STUFF THAT THEY, WE GOT OUTTA HERE WOULD BE THE EXACT THING. THINGS WE'D BE REHASHING THAT WAS HASHED BY THE TASK FORCE. AND SO I DEFINITELY SUPPORT YOUR THING. IF IT'S GONNA GO BACK ANYWHERE, IT NEEDS TO GO BACK TO THE TASK FORCE AND NOT TO US. BECAUSE IF WE CREATE A SUBCOMMITTEE, IT'S AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT GROUP OF PEOPLE ARGUING OVER THE SAME ISSUES THAT WAS ARGUED OVER IN THE TASK FORCE FOR SIX MONTHS. ARMANDO, THANK YOU. I WANTED TO SAY I AGREE WITH THAT. UM, I THINK THAT AS, AS COLLEEN SAID, WE'RE NOT, YOU WOULD SUPPORT A TO D, THE TOD ALREADY EXISTS. AND SO WE'RE REALLY PUTTING BETTER FRAMEWORK TO THAT TO, I MEAN, I THINK THE THREE THINGS THAT SHE JUST DISCUSSED WERE NOT EVEN IN THIS DISTRICT THAT HAS PROPOSED. THOSE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE ORDINANCE. SO I THINK THIS IS A BETTER FRAMEWORK FOR THAT. OKAY. THANKS. UH, BIANCA. GREAT. THANK YOU. CAN WE GO TO SECTION [03:55:02] TWO, LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND ZONING AUTHORITY SUB ITEM C, PAGE TWO RIGHT THERE. WHAT PAGE? PAGE TWO ON C WHERE IT SAYS TOD DISTRICT SHALL BE APPLIED TO A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO A HALF ACRE. THAT IS WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE OF FOUR UNITS OR LESS. I WOULD LIKE US TO CONSIDER TO CHANGE THAT TO NO LIMIT FOR A PROPERTY, A SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTY WITHIN THE CRAG, WHICH IS THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES. I THINK THE SUPPORTS, THE COMMENTS THAT MS. HERNANDEZ MADE TO ADDRESS THE ANNEXATION OF LARGER ZONED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS THAT WERE ANNEXED ONTO THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES OF THE CITY. AND I WOULD ASK FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR THAT CHANGE. DO YOU WANT MY NEXT ONE, MR. CHAIR? I'M JUST GONNA MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. UM, IT, IT IS FIVE O'CLOCK, SO I JUST, IT SEEMS LIKE WE ARE GONNA CONTINUE, UM, PULLING THROUGH WITH THIS ITEM. SO WE ARE GONNA GO AHEAD AND PROVIDE, UH, FOOD AND WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE A BREAK. WE CAN CONTINUE GOING AND, UM, YOU CAN EAT AT THE SAME TIME. OKAY. UM, I CONTINUE, I'M SORRY, DOES HAVING A SECOND OR WE CAN DO EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY, TALK ABOUT IT OR GO THROUGH A WHOLE LIST? WHAT, WHAT'S THAT? SO ARE WE GOING TO GO THROUGH A LIST OR VOTE ON EACH ONE AND KIND OF TALK ABOUT 'EM ONE ON ONE OR HOW, HOW WE APPROACH THIS? 'CAUSE IN THE PAST WE WOULD KIND OF DO A RECOMMENDATION AND KIND OF VOTE ON WHETHER OR NOT THAT WAS GOOD OR NOT. I THINK WE'RE KIND OF DISCUSS THAT. I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE'LL DO. YEAH. SO WOULD YOU LIKE DRAW MY PRIOR MOTION TO SEND IT FOR A SUBCOMMITTEE BECAUSE IT HAD A SECOND AND DIDN'T GET A VOTE. OH, I DID NOT KNOW THAT WAS AN OFFICIAL MOTION. THE MOTION TO SEND IT TO A SUBCOMMITTEE? YES. YES, BECAUSE HE SECONDED IT. OH, I DID NOT HEAR THE SECOND EITHER. NO. SO I'LL WITHDRAW IT. OKAY. BUT I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CHANGE. LET'S GO BACK TO THE C UM, WHERE THE HALF ACRE, UM, APPLIES OUTSIDE OF THE 36 SQUARE MILES AND THAT ALL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES INSIDE THE CRAG ARE PROTECTED. OKAY. CAN YOU SAY THAT? SO MOVED. OKAY. THANK YOU. SORRY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SECOND. SO, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. CAN YOU REREAD YOUR MOTION PLEASE? LET ME FIGURE IT OUT. OKAY. SO TODD DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE APPLIED TO PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ALLY OR ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE CRACK. I, OKAY. DO YOU WANNA WRITE IT IN THE AFFIRMATIVE OR DO YOU HAVE SUGGESTIONS OF LANGUAGE? I THINK WHAT I'M SEEING IS THAT, OKAY, TO D DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE APPLIED A PROPERTY ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO A HALF A HALF OF AN ACRE. THAT IS WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE OF FOUR UNITS OR LESS. I WOULD ACTUALLY REPEAT THE SENTENCE. SO IT'S VERY CLEAR. TOD DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE APPLIED TO PROPERTY ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, UM, WITH, WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE OF FOUR UNITS OR LESS, UH, WITHIN THE CRAG. SO THAT WAY YOU HAVE TWO SEPARATE SENTENCES, ONE WITH A HALF ACRE LIMITATION AND ONE WITHOUT CORRECT. AND, AND THE REASON FOR THIS ADDRESS IS THE CONCERN THAT WAS BROUGHT UP BY STAFF. THEY DID NOT WANT TO HAVE A LIMIT FOR THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE, THERE WERE LARGE SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES SITTING OUT THERE THAT COULD BE REZONED TO TODD THAT HAD BEEN ANNEXED IN. THAT DOESN'T, THERE'S NOT A 30 ACRE PARCEL THAT'S ZONED SINGLE FAMILY IN THE URBAN CORE THAT'S SITTING OUT THERE IN THIS CONDITION. AND THIS REALLY PROTECTS THE, THE, THE URBAN CORE COMMUNITY FROM HAVING, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN STILL DO DEVELOPMENT ON SMALL PARCELS, YOU CAN STILL DO AN IDZ ZONING AND STILL NEGATE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND STILL HAVE OTHER TOOLS TO DO INFILL DEVELOPMENT. IT ISN'T A ONE SIZE FITS ALL, BUT IT DOES PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR THESE LARGE PARCELS THAT MAY BE INSIDE A BLOCK FACE AND GOES WITH THE INTENT OF THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS MENTIONED AT THE BEGINNING WHERE IT SAID IT WAS NOT INTENDED TO HAVE A TODD DEVELOPMENT IN THE MIDDLE OF A BLOCK. ARE YOU GUYS CAUGHT UP? I THINK THEY'RE PULLING IT UP NOW. JUST A MOMENT. DOES EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND WHERE THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES ARE OF THE CITY? I'M ASSUMING, THANK YOU. [04:00:29] I GUESS POINT OF CLARIFICATION, ARE WE VOTING ON EACH ONE? I THINK IT WOULD BE BEST. SO QUESTION SECOND. YEP. I THINK WE HAVE A QUESTION DISCUSSION. OKAY. UM, SO JUST A, A PROCESS QUESTION. SO THIS BASICALLY, SO SAYING THAT A PROPERTY THAT'S ZONED RESIDENTIAL CAN'T BE ZONED TO TOD, YOU'RE BASICALLY LIMITING THAT PROPERTY OWNER'S OPTIONS. YOU'RE, YOU'RE TAKING THIS ZONING DISTRICT ENTIRELY OFF THE TABLE. UM, SO I GUESS A I HAVE CONCERNS WITH THAT, UM, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, OFTENTIMES YOU HAVE PROPERTIES THAT ARE FRONTING ON, UM, OR, OR THEIR, THEIR SIDE PROPERTY LINE IS ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND, YOU KNOW, A RESIDENTIAL USE IS NOT, NOT SUSTAINABLE. AND SO YOU'RE LIMITING THIS PROPERTY OWNER'S ABILITY TO CHANGE THE USE OF, OF THAT PROPERTY. UM, AND THEN THE SECOND ISSUE, I GUESS IS JUST FROM A PROCESS STANDPOINT. I MEAN THAT PROPERTY OWNER CAN STILL REQUEST IDZ OR A WHOLE HOST OF OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WOULD ALLOW MORE INTENSE DEVELOPMENT. UM, AND THEY COULD ALSO, COULDN'T THEY JUST REZONE TO, UM, OH ONE AND THEN REZONE TO TOD? CORRECT. SO THE OTHER THING IS, IF I MAY, I DIDN'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT YOU, MICHAEL. UM, THE OTHER IMPORTANT PIECE IS ABOUT THE MAPS. SO BECAUSE YOU HAVE A CUSTOMIZED MAP PROCESS, YOU'RE ABLE TO ALLOW THOSE, UM, THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS TO DETERMINE WHAT THOSE BOUNDARIES LOOK LIKE. SO YOU DON'T HAVE THE ENCROACHMENT DRIVING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. YOU'RE, YOU'RE CREATING THE BOUNDARIES THAT MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, UH, LOTS WITH SINGLE FAMILY, UH, USES. SO, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS PROCESS SHOWS ON THE GREEN LINE, MAKING SURE IT DOESN'T IMPACT THEM. SO YOU DON'T HAVE THE ACCIDENTAL, OH, THIS ONE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK WITHIN THE BOUNDARY IS HAPPENS TO BE OVER A HALF ACRE. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S, IT'S IMPORTANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE CUSTOMIZED MAP PROCESS TIED TO IT SO YOU AVOID THOSE SITUATIONS OF THE OVER A HALF ACRE. I THINK TO YOUR POINT, I THINK IT'D BE A SHAME TO TAKE THIS CHOICE AWAY FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS THAT IT'S NOT BEING FORCED ON THEM. IT'S COMPLETELY AN OPTION. AND IF THAT FITS THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY, IT WOULD STILL GO THROUGH ZONING COMMISSION AND IF THAT FITS THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE COMMUNITY WILL HAVE INPUT. UM, SO I I WOULD HATE TO TAKE THAT OPTION AWAY, UM, FROM A PROPERTY OWNER LIKE THAT. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THAT, BIANCA? YEAH, I JUST HAD, UM, ONE LAST COMMENT. IT DOESN'T TAKE ANYTHING AWAY FROM THEM. IT DOES, IT PREVENTS THEM FROM BEING APPLICABLE TO TODD. THEY CAN STILL REZONE TO ANYTHING ELSE. THEY CAN STILL REZONE TO IDC. AND SO I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AS FAR AS THE, THE SENSITIVITY AND WHY THE CITY HAS SPENT SO MUCH MONEY SPENDING DOING REPORTS ON THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES AND SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, INFILL DEVELOPMENT, IT NEEDS TO BE VERY SENSITIVE TO THIS AREA. THIS IS TAKING THAT SENSITIVITY INTO, INTO PLACE. WE'RE NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT ANYWHERE IN THE CITY. AND JUST TO LET Y'ALL KNOW, IDZ IS ONLY INSIDE LOOP FOUR 10, SO WE KNOW THAT THESE URBAN CORE NEIGHBORHOODS ALREADY HAVE MORE INFILL DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES THAN WHAT WE SEE IN OTHER AREAS. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE, AND I THINK ONE PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WAS MADE TODAY THAT'S VERY CRITICAL TODAY IS THAT WE HAVE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES OVER OUR, OUR, OUR CITY. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, SOME NEIGHBORHOODS ONLY HAVE THE UDC TO PROTECT THEM. AND SO I'M ASKING YOU TO PROTECT THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS IN THOSE AREAS WHERE THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS TO STAND FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY. WE CAN'T DECIMATE AND DEMOLISH AND REDEVELOP EVERYTHING. AND I THINK THIS IS VERY SPECIFIC TO THE URBAN CORE. IT DOESN'T PREVENT THEM FROM BEING ABLE TO REDEVELOP, IT DOESN'T PREVENT THEM FROM NEGATING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT. THEY'RE STILL ELIGIBLE FOR IDZ AND FILLED ZONE ZONING, WHICH IS A TOOL, LIKE I SAID, IT'S ONLY AVAILABLE, UM, IN INSIDE LOOP FOUR 10, WHICH IS THERE'S MORE OPTIONS AVAILABLE HERE THAN ANY OTHER AREA IN THE CITY. AND SO I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO TAKE INTO CONTEXT AND I REALLY HOPE THAT YOU WOULD SUPPORT THIS AS YOU COULD HEARD FROM VERY, UH, FROM SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS. IT IS, IT IS A CONCERN TO [04:05:01] THE URBAN COURT NEIGHBORHOODS. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERATION. OKAY. YES, SIR. UH, MR. CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO SECOND THAT. UM, AS, AS SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN, UM, FOCUSING ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, UM, FOR 2020 SOME ODD YEARS, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE PRESERVATION COMMUNITY, BY AND LARGE IS NOT ABOUT PUTTING HISTORIC DISTRICTS UNDER GLASS AND TREATING THEM LIKE MUSEUM EXHIBITS. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF EXCEPTIONS, YOU KNOW, THE WILLIAMSBURG'S OF THE WORLD FOR GOOD REASON. BUT IN, IN LIVING BREATHING CITIES, THE IDEA IS TO SUPPORT THE, THE, THE CULTURAL RESOURCES THAT ARE DEVELOPING THERE AND, AND, UH, AN APPRECIATION FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT THAT HAS GROWN UP THERE. AND TO ACCEPT THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE EVOLUTION AS THINGS MOVE ON, WHETHER THAT'S TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENTS OR TECHNOLOGY. AND I THINK TOD, UH, IN THEORY AND IN PRACTICE IN OTHER CITIES HAS OFFERED SOME WONDERFUL THINGS. AND NOW WE'RE LEARNING HOW THAT MIGHT IN REALITY APPLY IN LARGE SCALE HERE IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF OUR CITY. BUT WE WANT SAN ANTONIO AND ITS SPECIFIC NEIGHBORHOODS TO BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THEIR DISTINCT CHARACTER AND FLAVOR. AND AS THEY CHANGE, NOT POUR TOO MUCH GAS ON AND HIT THE ACCELERATOR TOO HARD, UM, THAT'S GOING TO MOVE THIS TOO FAST. WE WANT TO HELP ENABLE CHANGE AND LET IT EVOLVE, BUT LET COMMUNITIES BE PART OF THAT CONVERSATION AND ENGAGE WITH IT. AND I THINK THAT THIS PARTICULAR AMENDMENT IS HELPFUL BECAUSE WE'RE NOT THROWING WIDE THE FLOODGATES A HUNDRED PERCENT. WE'RE OPENING THEM AND WE'RE LETTING WATER FLOW THROUGH. AND WE'RE LEARNING HOW THIS PROCESS WORKS WITHIN OUR HISTORIC CONTEXT AND OUR UNIQUE CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. AND AS TIME CHANGES, YOU KNOW, THIS, THIS COULD BE REVISED AGAIN IN ANOTHER TWO OR THREE YEARS. UH, I'M JUST SAYING MAYBE WE SHOULDN'T MAKE ALL OF THE CHANGES ALL AT ONCE. AND FOR ALL THAT'S BEEN WRITTEN ABOUT THE WONDERS OF, OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION, I THINK WE HAVE AN IMPORTANT ROLE HERE AS A PUBLIC COMMITTEE TO TRY TO TEMPER THE PACE OF THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT WE CAN AND HELP PEOPLE ADAPT TO CHANGE. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? SO TO ADDRESS SOME, SOME OF YOUR KIND OF THINGS ON THE HISTORIC SIDE, THINGS THAT ARE HISTORIC ARE NOT JUST BECAUSE THEY'RE OLD. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE EVERYBODY GETS WRAPPED AROUND THE AXLE ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT EVERYTHING THAT'S OLD STAYS THE WAY IT WAS. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE NEIGHBORHOODS CHANGE OVER TIME. I MEAN, IF YOU GO AND LOOK AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD I GREW UP IN OUTSIDE OF 1604 OR OUTSIDE OF FOUR 10, IT'S CHANGED DRAMATICALLY BECAUSE THERE IS NO RESTRICTIONS ON ITS CHANGING. YOU KNOW WHAT, EVERYBODY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD STILL LOVES LIVING THERE BECAUSE IT'S GRADUALLY EVOLVED OVER TIME BY PUTTING THESE RESTRICTIONS IN PLACE, YOU DON'T ALLOW THOSE TO, THOSE THINGS TO EVOLVE OVER TIME. SO MOST OF THE HOUSES IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD HAVEN'T BEEN, HAVE BEEN REBUILT IN THE LAST 30 YEARS BECAUSE PEOPLE WANTED NEWER HOUSES. PEOPLE WANTED THINGS UPDATED, PEOPLE WANTED MODERN AMENITIES IN THEIR HOUSES. SO THOSE HOUSES ALL GOT REBUILT FOR THE MOST PART. SOME OF 'EM ARE STILL THE ORIGINAL HOUSES, BUT THAT'S WHERE LIMITING AND BY PUTTING D UH, COVENANTS, ZONING RULES, THINGS LIKE THAT, AGAINST THAT ADOPTION AND A DEVELOPMENT AND KEEPING THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECOMES A PROBLEM BECAUSE NOW NOBODY'S ALLOWED TO MAKE CHANGES TO THEIR, TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS TO MEET MODERN NEEDS. YES, MA'AM. YEAH, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO CLARIFY THIS IS NOT ABOUT, UH, THE EVOLUTION OF A NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS ABOUT SENSITIVITY TO INFILL AND THAT WE KNOW THAT THESE CHANGES ARE ALREADY COMING AND HAVE OCCURRED. UM, THERE ARE A LOT OF EXAMPLES IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION WHERE YOU SEE THESE SLENDER HOMES THAT HAVE COME IN AND INFILLED IN THE MIDDLE OF A SINGLE FAMILY, UM, DEVELOPMENT. AND YOU ONLY SEE THAT IN THE URBAN CORE. YOU DON'T SEE THAT ANYWHERE ELSE OUTSIDE LUKE FOUR 10. SO THERE WERE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE CODE TO ENSURE THAT THERE WAS COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT. SEVERAL OF US WHO SAT ON THIS SAME P TAC CODE DURING THE LAST UDC AMENDMENTS APPROVED THOSE BECAUSE WE, WE UNDERSTAND THE NEED AND, AND THE, AND THE URGENCY TO ENSURE THAT AS WE GROW, WE GROW WITHIN THE PARAMETERS THAT WE HAVE, THAT YOU DON'T COMPLETELY DECIMATE WHAT IS THERE. AND IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT OUR HOUSING, IT'S ABOUT OUR CULTURE, IT'S ABOUT OUR HISTORY. IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THE STRUCTURE ITSELF. AND SO I GUESS I'D LIKE TO CALL THE QUESTION AND HAVE A VOTE. THANK YOU. OKAY. UM, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THAT ITEM. I GUESS WE WILL HAVE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. WE HAVE THE FIRST WITH BIANCA MALDONADO AND THE SECOND PHILLIP MANA. PHILLIP. PHILLIP. PHILLIP MANA. OKAY. BIANCA? YES. PHILLIP MANA. YES. ANNA MARIE MILAM. YES. ROBERT . YES. [04:10:01] KIMBERLY BRAGMAN. I JUST WANT CLARIFICATION, ARE WE VOTING ON THE CALLING FOR THE VOTE OR ARE WE VOTING ON THE AMENDMENT? THE AMENDMENT. WE DON'T HAVE TO VOTE ON THE CALL FOR CALL CALLING FOR THE VOTE FIRST. NO, WE'RE, WE'RE VOTING ON THIS REVISION IS WHAT WE'RE DOING. RIGHT. I UNDERSTAND. BUT DON'T PROCEDURALLY AREN'T WE SUPPOSED TO VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE VOTE FIRST? SO YEAH, THERE, THERE'S A WAY. IF THE CHAIR WANTED TO STOP THE PUBLIC COMMENT AND THEN CALL FOR THE VOTE, BUT BECAUSE ALL THE COMMENT IT SOUNDS LIKE HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED BY THE TAC, THEN WE CAN HAVE THE VOTE ITSELF. CLARIFICATION THEN? UH, NO. MICHAEL ELDER, HE LEFT. MICHAEL MOORE? YES. ARMANDO OBA? NO. MICHAEL TAYLOR? NO. ROBERT HANLEY? YES. LUKE ROBINSON. UH, YES. DOMINIC DOMINGUEZ. YES. PHIL PIERCE. YES. CHRISTOPHER . YES. ERIC ERIC ESTRADA. YES. PHILLIP . CRYSTAL MAYOR. I DON'T EVEN KNOW I'VE STEPPED OUT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON. SO THE, THE LANGUAGE ON YOUR SCREEN THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW IS NOW A RE BASICALLY SAYING THAT WITHIN THE CRAG, WITHIN THE ORIGINAL 36 SQUARE MILES, THAT NO MATTER THE SIZE OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT WOULD NOW BE PROHIBITED FROM REQUESTING TO REZONE TO TOD PROHIBITED? NO. MIKE ANDERSON. YES. JAY HOWELL? NO. BILL WHITE. NO. CHAIR. PECK? NO. HAVE I CALLED EVERYONE? NO. YOU MISSED YASMINE OR YAMIN. SORRY. WHO ELSE? SO YOU WERE YUMMY. NO. DID EVERYONE ELSE GET CALLED MATTHEW? MATTHEW? NO. I, I THINK, DID EVERYONE ELSE VOTE? IS ANYONE THAT HASN'T VOTED? THINK THAT'S, I THINK THAT'S IT. YOU JUST NEED A MAJORITY VERSUS MINORITY, RIGHT? YEAH. MOTION PASSES. MM-HMM. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. UH, REAL QUICK BEFORE WE MOVE ON, UNDER THE TWO PARAGRAPHS ABOVE THE HIGHLIGHTED ONE, THERE'S A BUNCH OF XS BY THE ORDINANCE NUMBER. OH. BECAUSE ONCE THE GREEN LINE MAPS ARE ADOPTED, THE BOUNDARY MAPS, THEN WE'LL PUT THAT LANGUAGE IN THERE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, MA? SORRY. SO I, I HAD A QUESTION FOR THE NEXT SENTENCE. AND, AND THIS IS FOLLOW UP ON, UH, MR. STRIP'S QUESTION WITH REGARDS TO, UM, UM, SETBACK OR, OR NOT SET, UM, UM, YEAH, SETBACKS ASIDE AND DOES IT APPLY TO TOWN HOMES AS WELL? 'CAUSE TOWN HOMES WE HAVE, WE'RE BLESSED WITH TOWN HOMES IN OUR COMMUNITY AND THEY GET CAR BLANC ON ZERO ZERO EVERYWHERE. UH, NO FRONT, NO BACK, NO SIDES. SO DO THEY, DO THEY COMPLY WITH THE FIVE FOOT AND 10 FOOT? SO TOWN HOMES IN OUR, IN OUR CODE HAVE, UH, REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE BELIEVE IN ARTICLE FOUR. UM, THE REASON WHY THEY'RE TOWN HOMES IS BECAUSE THEY'RE LIKE ROW HOUSES, SO THEY DON'T HAVE SIDE SETBACKS. RIGHT. AND IT, TO BE A TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT, YOU HAVE TO HAVE THREE THREE OF THOSE, UM, THOSE UNITS TOGETHER IN ORDER TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TOWN HOME. BUT THEY STILL HAVE THEIR REAR, UM, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND THEY HAVE, UH, FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND THEY HAVE TO MEET CERTAIN, UH, MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS DEPENDING UPON THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT THEY'RE IN. UH, SO IN IN, IN THIS CASE, IT'S CONSIDERED A, A SINGLE FAMILY USE. RIGHT. SO, UH, IT STILL HAS TO, AGAIN, THREE WOULDN'T HAVE A SIDE, BUT, UH, AND IF THEY'RE [04:15:01] A BUDDING A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THEY, THEY HAVE THE SAME SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS THAT SINGLE FAMILY HOME. MR. TAYLOR, I HAVE A, UH, ANOTHER SUGGESTION THAT'S KIND OF IN THE REALM OF THIS ONE. SO, UM, SO GOING TO THE, I KNOW WE'RE JUST KIND OF JUMPING, I GUESS WE'RE JUST KIND OF JUMPING AROUND. BUT, UM, ON THE USE MATRIX, UM, ON PAGE, UH, NINE, SO DWELLING ONE FAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY, UM, IS NOT A, NOT A PERMITTED USE. UM, AND I WAS JUST FROM AN AFFORDABILITY PERSPECTIVE, I THINK IT MAKES SENSE TO HAVE IT AS A PERMITTED USE. I KNOW, UM, YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY IN THIS AREA, YOU CAN ACHIEVE DENSITIES THAT ARE PRETTY SIMILAR TO TOWN HOMES, UM, BUT HAVE HOMES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS. AND THE ADVANTAGE OF THAT IS THAT, UM, YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A, A CONDO ASSOCIATION OR AN HOA, UH, WHICH MAKES LONG-TERM HOUSING AFFORDABILITY, UH, MORE CHALLENGING. SO MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THAT WE, THAT WE PERMIT, UM, THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS IN THE, IN ALL OF THE DISTRICTS, AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT, THIS IS JUST GIVING THE OPTION. I MEAN, THIS ISN'T AN ENABLING ORDINANCE. SO ALL IT DOES IS GIVE SOMEONE THE OPTION OF DOING THAT. IF IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. BUT I THINK, UM, I THINK FROM AN AFFORDABILITY PERSPECTIVE, IT, IT, THERE IS AN ADVANTAGE TO THAT YOU WANNA DO THAT. SO IT'S THAT JUST ADDING P ON BOTH OF THOSE COLUMNS? YEP. THAT'S WHAT HE'S SHOWING. CORRECT. STEPH HAS NO OBJECTION TO THAT. JUST PROVIDES ANOTHER OPTION. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? OKAY. WELL, YOU'VE HAD YOUR HAND UP. I DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS ABOUT THIS ITEM OR YOU'RE JUST, IT WAS ABOUT THIS ITEM BECAUSE COLLEEN WAS ACTUALLY GONNA CHIME IN ABOUT THIS ITEM. SHE HAD RAISED THE SAME CONCERN AND ASKED ME WHY IT WASN'T PERMISSIBLE. AND I SAID, WELL, MAYBE BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T WANT THE MASSING AND SCALE LIKE IT, THE OVERALL AREA WHERE IT WOULD BE A GOOD FIT. THAT WAS THE ONLY, THAT WAS THE ONLY THING I THOUGHT OF, BUT I MEAN, TO BE HONEST, THERE'S REASON, NO REASON TO HAVE IT. IF WE WANTED TO VOTE ON THAT. I HAVE ANOTHER ONE DOWN BELOW. OKAY. IS IT ON THAT SAME TABLE? YES. ALL RIGHT. LET, WHY DON'T WE TALK ABOUT THAT ONE THEN? OKAY. LET ME ASK STAFF A QUESTION. ARE WE IN DANGER OF LOSING A QUORUM HERE? NO. NO. OKAY. A QUORUM IS A MINIMUM OF NINE. NINE. GREAT. YEAH. I'M SORRY. DO YOU WANT MY NEXT ONE? I'M SORRY. YOU HAVE TO ACTUALLY GO BACK UP. ALL RIGHT. YEP. THAT'S OKAY. AMUSEMENT ENTERTAINMENT VENUE, OUTDOOR, UH, P PERMISSIBLE UNDER, I'M SORRY, UNDER, UH, THE MX. UM, I THINK IT'S INCONSISTENT BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE FAIRGROUND AND THE STADIUM WITH AN S UM, I THINK OF ENTERTAINMENT VENUE, OUTDOOR. THE REASON THIS COMES UP TO ME AT LEAST IS THAT IN ATTENDING THE NOISE ORDINANCE, TASK FORCE MEETINGS, THERE WERE A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT NOISE THAT WERE, THAT WAS OCCURRING WHEN YOU HAVE DENSITY, WHEN YOU HAVE HOUSING AND YOU HAVE OUTDOOR AMPLIFICATION OF NOISE. AND I THINK IF YOU PUT AN S ON THIS, IT WOULD ALLOW POTENTIALLY SOME MITIGATION TO OCCUR AS OPPOSED TO HAVING A P TO HAVE IT PERMITTED BY. RIGHT. UH, IT WOULD PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADJACENT BUSINESSES OR PROPERTY OWNERS OR RESIDENTS TO HAVE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THAT. IT HAS BEEN AN ISSUE OUT ON BROADWAY. IT'S NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT VENUE, BUT IT'S A BAR. AND THEY DID HAVE ENTERTAINMENT OUTSIDE AND THAT IS WHAT DREW THE CONCERN WAS THE AMPLIFICATION OF NOISE OUTSIDE AND THE HOURS OF OPERATION. SO I WAS GONNA ASK IF THE P COULD BE AN S UNDER THE MX ONLY ON THE AMUSEMENT FOR ENTERTAINMENT VENUE. OUTDOOR. OH, ON THE MXL. OKAY, MAN. UM, AND SO, UH, FOLLOW UP ON THAT. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I DID, AND I I SPOKE TO KAT EARLIER, IS I ACTUALLY TOOK, UM, OUR, OUR PRIOR USE MATRIX FOR, FOR, UM, NON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND THEN EMBEDDED THIS TABLE ON TOP OF IT AND WENT THROUGH AND SAID, OKAY, WHICH COLUMNS KIND OF LINE UP? AND THIS IS ONE OF THE EXAMPLES THAT DID COME UP AS BEING NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE, UH, NEXT DENSE, UH, MORE DENSE ONE, WHICH, UM, UH, IS, UH, IS AN S WHERE THIS ONE'S A P. AND SO TO ME THAT'S A, THAT WAS A, TO ME, AN OVERSTEP, YOU KNOW, IN THIS PARTICULAR ONE, UNLESS THERE'S A REASON TO DRIVE IT. AND [04:20:01] THERE'S A COUPLE MORE EXAMPLES IF WE DON'T GO ALL OF THEM AT ONCE OR, OR, OR JUST DO THIS ONE SINCE WE'RE ON THE PERMITTED USE TABLE. WE COULD DO 'EM ALL AT ONCE. I WOULD JUST DO ALL THE PERMITTED USE TABLE ITEMS. YEAH. SO, UM, PUNCH CONCRETE PRODUCTS, MIXING ONLY, THAT ONE'S THE SAME THING. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THAT IS. BUT YOU A P VERSUS REMEMBER TANG? YES. DO YOU REMEMBER TANG? YEAH, THAT'S WHAT IT IS. OKAY. SO WE BASICALLY CREATED A USE JUST FOR TANG. OKAY. YEAH. SO, SO, SO THAT ONE HAS THE S IN THE, IN THE, UH, THE MORE INTENSE ZONING CONFIGURATION. WHICH CATEGORY WAS IT IN AGAIN? THAT WAS PROCESSING. UNDER PROCESSING. OKAY. AND PUNCH CONCENTRATE. AND ARE YOU RECOMMENDING A CHANGE? THE S WOULD BE WHY? I GUESS MY RECOMMENDATION SIMPLY BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT IS. AND THEN IN THE, IN THE HI UNDER C TWO, SO UNDER C TWO IT'S LISTED, SO I'M SPEC SPEC, UH, SPECIFICALLY SPEAKING FOR THE TODD MX. AND UNDER THE C TWO EQUIVALENT, IT'S CURRENTLY AN S AND HERE WE'RE DOING PERMITTED. OH, OKAY. SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PUNCH CONCENTRATE PRODUCTS MIXING ONLY THE P AND MX? YES. THE REASON WHY WE RECOMMENDED P AND MX, BECAUSE IT'S MISS MIXING ONLY AND NOT PROCESSING. SO IT'S LIKE A SMALLER SCALE. LET'S SAY TANG HAD A STORE SATELLITE STOREFRONT, RIGHT. AND THEY WERE JUST MIXING THE POWDERS IN ORDER TO CREATE A CUSTOMIZED FLAVOR FOR A WALK-IN CUSTOMER. SO THEY'RE NOT PROCESS ANYTHING, THEY'RE JUST MIXING THEM ON SITE AND HERE YOU GO, SELL 'EM. I JUST EXPLAINED THE PROCESS THAT I DID. AND SO, I MEAN, IF GROUP SAYS THAT'S FINE, I'M JUST SAYING IN THE C TWO, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S UH, RIGHT. WE DIDN'T GO, WE DIDN'T GO INTO THAT CODE TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE USES THAT WE, WE FELT PROBABLY COULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE UDC AMENDMENT PROCESS, BUT WE WERE USING THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SET IT RIGHT, OR IT'S ACTUALLY, IT'S AN ESTIMATE IN THE C TWO. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS LOOKING FOR THAT CONSISTENCY. SO WE HAVE PERMITTED HERE AND AN S IN THE C TWO. AND SO, SO IT SEEMED LIKE WE'RE DOING AN EXTRA IN THIS, IN THIS AREA WHERE I GUESS RIGHT. WE TOOK IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SAY IT DIDN'T NEED AN S AN S BECAUSE IT WAS JUST MIXING AND NOT PROCESSING. WHAT CATEGORY ARE YOU UNDER? IT'S UNDER PROCESSING. IT'S ON PAGE 12. OKAY. I HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT MANUFACTURING. OKAY. WHAT I WOULD JUST GO TO, OKAY, SO IF YOU COULD, YOU WANNA DO ONE, YOU WANNA GO BACK UP TO M I'M SORRY. NO, UNDER M AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE, ELECTROPLATING, I DON'T KNOW. I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESS. SO I, THE PROCESS OF WHAT GETS RELEASED, THAT'S A HIGHLY TOXIC PROCESS. I WOULD NOT WANT IT TO BE PERMISSIBLE BY RIGHT. MAYBE AN S UM, ON ELECTROPLATING ON THE HYBRID INDUSTRIAL YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT? YES. IF NOT EVEN NOT ALLOWED AT ALL, TO BE HONEST. I MEAN I, THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT GO INTO MANUFACTURING WHERE IT SEEMS LIKE, OH, IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL, BUT IT'S WHAT THEY RELEASE AND WHAT THEY HAVE TO REGULATE AND WHAT THE KIND OF CHEMICALS THAT THEY DEAL WITH IN THEIR PROCESSING. AND THAT IS WHAT WAS CONCERNING TO ME. WHEN WE START BUILDING, UH, WHEN WE START DENSIFYING, IT'S KIND OF LIKE WHEN YOU HAVE YOUR, UM, YOUR HC YOU KNOW, DON'T GO AROUND LOOP FOUR 10 AND BRING TOXIC CHEMICALS IN THE CITY. THAT'S THE KIND OF THING I LOOK AT BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING DELIVERY OF VOLATILE CHEMICALS. YEAH. STUFF IS NO OBJECTION TO PUTTING AN S IN THE HYBRID INDUSTRIAL. ALSO. IT'S, AND IT'S NOT PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL, WHICH IS, WHICH WOULD BE MORE INTENSE. AND SO AGAIN, GOING BACK, I THINK WE, WE MISSED OUT BY NOT HAVING THOSE TABLES TO BE ABLE TO SAY, YOU KNOW, SIDE BY SIDE. AND SO THERE'S AN EXAMPLE, RIGHT? 'CAUSE THE GOAL WAS NOT TO MAKE IT EXACTLY LIKE IT, RIGHT. MAYBE REMOVE IT ALL TOGETHER AS OPPOSED TO CHANGING IT TO A DESK. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THAT EITHER. CHAIRMAN, REMOVING THAT, THAT ELECTROPLATING. UM, THIS IS ROBERT HENLEY. UM, I THINK YOU MADE A VERY CONVINCING COMMENT EARLIER ON THE TASK FORCE ADDRESS THIS. AND NOW WE'RE JUST, IN MY OPINION, WE'RE NITPICKING IT. I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION AS SUBMITTED IN ADDITION TO ANY MINOR CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE. BECAUSE WE'LL BE HERE TILL MIDNIGHT NITPICKING THE REST OF THIS THING. THANK YOU MR. HANLEY. I AGREE. SECOND THE MOTION. THREE SECONDS. OKAY. SO YOU, OKAY. CAN YOU PLEASE RESTATE YOUR MOTION? THE MOTION IS, UM, WITH THE EXCEPTION, UH, OR TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS PREVIOUSLY VOTED ON AND MADE WE ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DOD, UH, UH, AS SUBMITTED BY CITY STAFF. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. THE MOTION WAS BY MR. HANLEY. THE SECOND WAS, I HEARD ABOUT THREE OF THEM, BUT I'M GONNA GIVE IT TO YOU. YAMINI [04:25:02] CHAIR. I JUST HAD ONE QUESTION, MR. HANLEY. WE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT PARKING. UM, I WAS WONDERING IF WE COULD HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT PARKING BEFORE WE MAKE A A, A MOTION TO APPROVE IT AS SUBMITTED. MY CONCERN IS, UM, THE MX HAS ZERO PARKING REQUIREMENT. I WOULD LIKE US TO CONSIDER A 50% IF YOU WANT ME TO TELL YOU WHAT I'M LOOKING AT. I I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BIANCA. AND I THINK THE TASK FORCE PROBABLY GAVE A LOT OF CREDIT TO THAT. AND AS YOU ARE PROBABLY WELL AWARE, IF YOU READ ABOUT WHAT TODS DO IN COMMUNITIES, THERE'S PLUSES AND MINUSES. THERE ARE TOD FRIENDLY MORTGAGES THAT SOMEBODY WHO LIVES IN A TOD DOES NOT HA CAN, CAN QUALIFY FOR MORE. 'CAUSE THEY HAVE GOOD MASS TRANSIT. AND I THINK THAT PART OF THE ISSUE ON THE PARKING IS YOU'RE NEVER GONNA BE ABLE TO MEET EVERYBODY'S DESIRE FOR WHAT IS ADEQUATE PARKING, BUT WITH THE MASS TRANSIT IS TO TRY TO, IF THE TOD IS TO TRY TO GET PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR VEHICLES MORE. UH, SO, UM, I THINK THAT I'M GONNA KEEP THE MOTION AS I SUBMITTED IT. COULD I HAVE ONE OTHER COMMENT FOR CONSIDERATION? CHAIR? WHAT IS THAT? IF YOU'RE NOT INTERESTED IN CHANGING OR BEING AMENABLE TO THAT, WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE TO A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY EVALUATE A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM FOR, UM, TOD MAPS IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE CONCERNS WITH ON STREET PARKING SPECIFICALLY AS MENTIONED BY SOME OF THE STAKEHOLDERS THAT SENT IN LETTERS? IF WE CAN MAYBE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT. OKAY. UH, I'M TELL YOU WHAT, I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE A SEPARATE MOTION AFTER WE VOTE ON THE MOTION THAT I MADE. AND JUST A FY BACKGROUND. UH, I KNOW THAT THERE WAS SOME MISINFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WERE FROM 64. UH, IN 1997 WHEN THE CITY ADOPTED THE NEW MASTER PLAN, MIKE AND I WERE ON THE MASTER PLAN POLICIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE. IT WAS AT THAT TIME THAT WE REDID OUR PARKING COUNTS. AND NOT ONLY DID WE HAVE MINIMUMS, WE HAD MAXIMUMS. SO IT'S NOT AN ANTIQUATED DOCUMENT TO HAVE THAT, BUT I WOULD RECOMMEND WE VOTE ON THE MOTION CALL THE, THE MOTION THAT I, I MADE ON, AND THEN IF YOU WANNA MAKE A MOTION TO MAKE THAT AS AN A CHANGE BECAUSE THAT'S DIFFERENT FROM THE MOTION I MADE. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS A, A MOTION AND SECOND FOR A FINAL RECOMMENDATION. YES. IS THAT RIGHT? OKAY. YEP. CAN STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL, BUT BEFORE I WANNA CLARIFY, BUT IT INCLUDES THE CHANGE THAT WAS VOTED ON EARLIER. THAT IS CORRECT. YES. YES. ROBERT HANLEY? YES. YAI KEN? YES. ANN MILO. YES. ROBERT SYS, NO. KIMBERLY BRAGMAN. MICHAEL MOORE. YES. WAS THAT A YES? HE SAID YES. MICHAEL TAYLOR. YES. PHIL PIERCE. YES. CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON? NO. ERIC ESTRADA? NO. PHILLIP MANNA? NO. BIANCA MARDO? NO. CRYSTAL MEYER, YES. MIKE ANDERSON. I THINK HE LEFT. JAKE HOWELL? YES. BILL WHITE. YES. MOTION PASSES. YOU DIDN'T GET MY VOTE, BUT MY VOTE WAS YES. CHAIR PEGS. YES. MOTION YOUR PASSES. ALRIGHT, SO THERE WE GO. SO I THINK BIANCA HAD, UM, AND IF I MAY PROVIDE SOME, UH, ALSO SOME LANGUAGE. SO GO AHEAD FIRST AND THEN I'LL KIND OF GIVE THAT RECOMMENDATION. SO IN THE UDC TODAY, THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO ENACT A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. AND IT ONLY EXISTS IN SOUTHTOWN TODAY. AND [04:30:01] YOU CAN INITIATE IT, THE RESIDENTS CAN INITIATE IT, BUT SO CAN THE CITY. SO I'M ASKING FOR THE CITY'S PARKING OFFICIAL IS HOW IT'S DESIGNATED IN THE UDC TO DO AN EVALUATION SPECIFICALLY IN THE KING WILLIAM AND IN THE LA VACA AREAS FOR WHEN TODD IS IMPLEMENTED, UH, TO SEE IF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PRO PROGRAM SHOULD EXIST, UM, ON THOSE STREETS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO THOSE CORRIDORS. AND I WILL TELL YOU, IF ANYBODY GOES DOWN THERE, YOU, YOU, YOU CAN SEE THE NEED. AND I DON'T WANNA BE A PART OF SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T PROVIDE A SOLUTION AND MAKES SOMEBODY'S QUALITY OF LIFE MORE DIFFICULT OR IMPEDES THE ACCESSIBILITY FOR LIFE SAFETY WITH AMBULANCES AND FIRE TRUCKS TO GET IN THERE BECAUSE THEY'RE VERY NARROW STREETS. SO IT IT, AND I'LL, LET ME ADD ONE LAST THING. WHEN I MENTIONED EARLIER ABOUT COMMUNITY PLANS, IT TAKES THE CITY TO COME IN AND SAY, NO PARKING ON THIS SIDE. YOU KNOW, RESIDENT CAN REQUEST IT PARCEL BY PARCEL, BUT YOU HAVE TO HAVE LIKE, I THINK TWO OR THREE AT A TIME. BUT SOMEBODY NEEDS TO COME IN AND TAKE AN EVALUATION OF THAT FROM A LIFE SAFETY PERSPECTIVE AND MAKE THOSE DECISIONS. AND I THINK IT, IT'S IMPERATIVE TO DO THAT. AND THAT'S WHY I WOULD ASK THAT WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. AND KAT, YOU SAID YOU HAD SOME LANGUAGE. I THINK I WAS SO I THINK AUDREY'S ALSO GONNA CHIME IN, BUT UM, YES, THERE IS THAT PROVISION IN THE CODE. UM, IF I, IF I'M UNDERSTANDING CORRECTLY, IT WOULD BE A PROCESS THAT WOULD BE TRIGGERED SOMEHOW EITHER THROUGH, UM, THE RESIDENTS REQUEST OR, UM, OR, OR CITY INITIATIVE THAT WOULD HAPPEN IF A PROPERTY IS REZONED TO TOD. 'CAUSE WE'RE NOT APPLYING IT TODAY. IT WOULD BE WOULD HAPPEN IF A PROPERTY WITHIN AN AREA IS, IS REZONED TO TOD. BUT THERE'S SOME STEPS THAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN. IT'S A SEPARATE PROCESS FROM THIS. UM, AND, AND I THINK HAVING THE COMMENTS ON THE RECORD FOR THE, FOR THE RECORD ARE GOOD. UM, BUT IT, I, AND I DON'T WANNA SPEAK FOR THIS, BUT IT MAY BE OUT OF THE PURVIEW OF THIS, UH, BECAUSE AGAIN, IT'S A ENTIRELY SEPARATE PROCESS THAT OF WHICH THOSE DEPARTMENTS ARE NOT HERE BECAUSE IT'S OVERSEEN BY ANOTHER DEPARTMENT. BUT, UM, BUT TYPICALLY WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THAT IT WOULD SOMEHOW BE TRIGGERED WHETHER IT'S THROUGH CITY OR WHETHER IT'S THROUGH THE RESIDENCE, TO LOOK AT IF A PROPERTY IS REZONED TO TOD. AND SO SINCE THIS PROCESS DOESN'T DO THAT, THERE'S NO NEED TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW. YEAH. I JUST WANTED TO JUMP IN AND AND REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THE PARKING PROGRAM IS A COMPLETELY SEPARATE PROGRAM FROM THIS RUN BY COMPLETELY SEPARATE DEPARTMENT. IT HAS DIFFERENT RULES, DIFFERENT REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO IT AND THEY HAVE NOT BEEN A PART OF THIS CONVERSATION AT ALL. AND SO WHILE YOU ALL CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AND I THINK MATTHEW HAS SOME SOMETHING THAT HE NEEDS TO ADD RELATED TO Y'ALL'S PURVIEW, BUT YOU CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. BUT THAT IS COMPLETELY, UM, RUN BY A COMPLETELY SEPARATE DEPARTMENT, HAS DIFFERENT RULES. JUST A REMINDER THAT THE FINAL ACTION OF THIS COMMITTEE AS A, UH, TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF PLANNING COMMISSION HAS TO BE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO YOU RE YOU CAN RECOMMEND TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS THIS OR MAYBE RECOMMEND THEIR RECOMMENDATION, BUT IT WILL, AGAIN, EVERY FINAL ACTION HERE IS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, NOT TO ANOTHER CITY DEPARTMENT. SO YOU WANT MY RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE PHRASED THAT AS TODD IS, UM, IMPLEMENTED THAT, UH, THE APPROPRIATE CITY DEPARTMENT AS DEFINED IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE EVALUATE, UH, RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT. I'M NOT ASKING THAT IT BE INITIATED, BUT TO EVALUATE MY UNDERSTANDING, THERE'S AN EVALUATION PROCESS. IS THAT, IS THAT BEYOND MY PURVIEW TO SAY, JUST TO HAVE THEM EVALUATE IT AGAIN? THE RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO POTENTIALLY MAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION. SURE. YEAH. AND THEN THEY CAN DISCUSS THAT WHENEVER THEY TAKE UP THIS ITEM. OKAY. I WOULD LIKE THE CITY TO BE ABLE TO, TO BE THE ONE TO INITIATE THAT EVALUATION. I WOULD NOT WANT US TO, FOR RESIDENTS TO WAIT TILL THERE'S A PROBLEM AND THEN HAVE TO PETITION FOR IT. I THINK WE, WE KNOW THAT THERE'S ALREADY, UM, SOME UNIQUE SITUATIONS DOWN THERE. OKAY. SO IS THAT A MOTION? YES, SIR. SO MOVED. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE. BIANCA . YES. AND WE HAVE THE SECOND BY CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON. CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON. YES. HANNAH MARIE MILAM. YES. YES. ROBERT SYS. YES. MICHAEL MOORE. YES. MICHAEL TAYLOR. YES. ROBERT HANLEY. YES. ERIC AVA. YES. PHILLIPA? YES. [04:35:03] CHRIS. CHRIS. CRYSTAL MEYER. YES. MIKE ANDERSON. YEAH. HE'S STILL GONE. STILL NOT HERE. DO YOU HAVE ANY KER? YES. JAY HOWELL? YES. BILL WHITE. YES. CHAIR PECK? YES. MOTION PASSES. GREAT. YA MEAN, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION A LITTLE BIT AGO ABOUT SOMETHING YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP AND I DON'T KNOW. WHO KNOWS? THERE YOU GO. OH, AND IT WAS PEARSALL ROAD, NOT PALO ALTO ROAD. THANK YOU. YES, MANNA. YES, SIR. SO, UM, SO THIS, WE WERE TALKING, SO THIS CHART THAT'S STILL UP HERE. WE, WE WERE HAVING SOME DIALOGUE AND THINGS WERE MOVING AROUND A LITTLE BIT BEFORE WE KIND OF STOPPED THE MOTION. AND SO, I DON'T KNOW, IS THAT CHART NOW FIXED AND THAT'S HOW IT'S GONNA BE PRESENTED? SO YES. UH, PRESENTED TO PLANNING COMMISSION CORRECT. AS IS THEN. RIGHT. WITHOUT THE DISCUSSION OF THOSE USES THAT WE TALKED ABOUT WITHOUT THE, BECAUSE THOSE WEREN'T VOTED ON, SO, OKAY. AND, UH, KAT CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IF THEY WANNA MODIFY THAT WHEN THEY TAKE THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PC TAC CAN MAKE THOSE CHANGES ALSO, CORRECT? YES. AND SO CAN ZONI COMMISSION AND SO CAN CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME KNOW MY AVENUE TO GET THIS CORRECTLY. 'CAUSE IT'S WRONG. AND SO WE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT 'EM, YOU KNOW, SO, SO I THINK, YOU KNOW, WE, WE WILL FIX IT. I GUESS ON THE BACK. IT MIGHT HELP. IF YOU PROVIDE ME THE REST OF 'EM, I'LL GIVE YOU SO THAT WAY WHAT? I'LL LET YOU SEE THEM. SO YEAH, JUST TO MAKE SURE, TO ME IT'S JUST NOT CONSISTENT. AND THAT'S WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR IS GOOD CONSISTENCY. SAYS THEY DID A LOUY JOB. YEAH, NO. WELL, SO THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M SAYING. NO, I THINK HE'S JOKING. THEY, THEY DIDN'T LOOK AT IT. THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT IT. AND SO IT'S PRESENTED AND I'M JUST CALLING OUT THAT THERE'S INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN ONE AND THE NEXT. THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. I WOULD ASK THAT YOU VISIT WITH KA ABOUT THAT AND THEN YOU GUYS CAN KIND OF COME TO AN AGREEMENT AND THEN WHATEVER COMES FORWARD, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY BE ADJUSTED. WE STILL HAVE ONE MORE ITEM. I KNOW. OKAY, SO NOW, NOW WE HAVE TWO MORE ITEMS. OH, MINUTES. OKAY. SO NOW WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER ONE, THE BYTE NETWORK PLAN. YES. BUT FIRST WE'RE GONNA TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK. OH, , ISN'T THIS AN INFORMATION ITEM? WE DON'T HAVE TO. NO. THIS IS FOR RECOMMENDATION. YEAH. PARKING STANDARDS, THEY STARTED. ALRIGHT, IF EVERYBODY COULD START GOING BACK TO THEIR SEATS. WE'LL GET THIS BALL ROLLING AGAIN. YOU HAVE 10 SECONDS? I HAVE 10 SECONDS. I'M KICKING YOU OUT. YES, BECAUSE RAISING THE MIC. HARLEY IS ON A ROLL. HARLEY'S ON HARLEY IS AN AGENDA. LET'S GO. I NEED NINE. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. YOU NOT IF THEY TALK STREETS, INFRASTRUCTURE, YOU NOT STAYING. DO YOU NEED YEAH, JUST, OKAY. YOU'VE SEEN IT BEFORE, SO IT'S, IT'S FINE. IT'S UP TO YOU. DO YOU WANT ME TO START TALKING? YES, PLEASE. WE'RE GONNA MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ITEM NUMBER ONE, THE BITE NETWORK PLAN. YES, GO AHEAD KAT. YES. THANK YOU. SO, UH, I WANTED, UH, TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE, UH, UH, MY TEAM MEMBER WHO, UH, SERVED AS THE PROJECT MANAGER ON THIS. IT'S HARLEY HUBBARD. SHE'S THE ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR. AND, UM, SHE HAS BEEN THE PRO PROJECT MANAGER ON THIS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, AS SOON AS SHE JOINED THE DEPARTMENT. UM, AND WE STARTED THIS PROCESS IN JANUARY OF 2023, WORKING WITH A CONSULTANT BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A BIKE MASTER PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED, UH, WAY BACK IN THE EIGHTIES AND IT'S BEEN UPDATED BACK IN 2011 AND NEEDS ANOTHER UPDATE. UH, AND SO WE'VE BEEN GOING THROUGH THIS PROCESS WITH THE COMMUNITY, UM, AND, UM, AND MANY TEAMS WHICH HARLEY WILL GO INTO AND, AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF THIS, THIS WORK AND EFFORT. SO WITH THAT, I'M GONNA HAND IT OFF TO HARLEY. THANK YOU KAT. GOOD NIGHT EVERYONE. UH, . I WILL BE EFFICIENT WITH MY TIME. I'M NOT GONNA SAY FAST BECAUSE YOU DESERVE THE DETAIL, BUT I WILL BE EFFICIENT. MY NAME IS HARLEY HUBBARD. I'M THE PROJECT MANAGER OF THE BYTE NETWORK PLAN. I HAVE ALSO JAED WITH ME TODAY ELIZABETH HI ON THE CONSULTING TEAM. SHE WORKS FROM RS NH FOR RS NH AND CAN HELP IF THERE'S A SUPER TECHNICAL QUESTION THAT I HAVE LOST BRAIN POWER FOR TODAY. ALRIGHT, THE BITE NETWORK PLAN. HERE IS OUR TIMELINE AND THIS IS WHY I'M SO GRATEFUL Y'ALL STAYED TO HEAR ME TALK TODAY. WE ARE SHOOTING FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION IN JANUARY AND THIS IS ONE OF OUR FIRST STOPS ON THAT ROAD SHOW TO ADOPTION. YOU CAN SEE WE'VE HAD MULTIPLE PHASES OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT EACH WITH A DIFFERENT THEME, AND WE'VE HAD DELIVERABLES COMING OUT ALONG THE WAY. UH, IN AN EMAIL THAT WAS SENT TO Y'ALL BEFORE THIS MEETING, WE LINKED OUR WEBSITE, SA BIKE NETWORK.COM, WHERE YOU CAN GET REALLY INTO THE WEEDS ON ALL OF THIS INFORMATION. [04:40:01] UH, I'LL ENTERTAIN QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY OF THAT INFORMATION AS WELL AS ANYTHING IN THIS, UH, PRESENTATION AT THE END. BUT IF I SAY SOMETHING AND YOU DON'T SEE IT ON THE SCREEN, IT'S ON THE WEBSITE. SO LET'S GO QUICKLY OVER PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT. WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT PHASES OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT. EACH PHASE FOCUSED ON DIFFERENT QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE WERE LOOKING TO UNDERSTAND WHERE PEOPLE WERE BIKING, WHAT THEIR EXPERIENCE WAS, BIKING HOW THEY FELT ABOUT SAFETY WHILE BIKING, UM, AND KIND OF THEIR VISION FOR BIKING FOR THE FUTURE. WE RECEIVED OVER 3,600 SURVEY RESPONSES AND WE HELD OVER 43 ENGAGEMENT EVENTS. AND OF COURSE MOST OF THOSE EVENTS WERE IN THE SUMMER. UH, SO WE WERE OUT THERE IN THE HEAT TALKING IN THE COMMUNITY NOT ONLY TO CYCLISTS, BUT TO PEOPLE, UM, WHO WOULD LIKE TO CYCLE BUT DON'T FEEL SAFE. UH, AND TO PEOPLE WHO HAD NO INTEREST BUT STILL HAD FEEDBACK TO GIVE. WE WERE HAPPY TO HEAR IT ALL. WE ALSO HAD LOTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, WHICH IS WHY I'M GOING THROUGH THIS EFFICIENTLY BECAUSE FOR A LOT OF Y'ALL, THIS ISN'T YOUR FIRST RODEO. WITH THIS INFORMATION, WE HAD FOUR STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEES THAT MET FOUR TIMES EACH. WE HAD OUR INTERNAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH IS 55 MEMBERS, MOSTLY OF INTERNAL CITY DEPARTMENTS. OUR TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH IS 30 MEMBERS OF MOSTLY EXTERNAL PARTNERS, THINK VIA THE MPO, ET CETERA. OUR MOBILITY WORKING GROUP, WHICH HAD 33 MEMBERS OF ORGANIZATIONS RELATED TO BIKING, THINK GIALLO CYCLING INITIATIVE, ACTIVATE SA, GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT. AND THEN OUR HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE, WHICH WERE 17 MEMBERS OF BOTH, UH, ORGANIZATIONS, EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL TO THE CITY, FOCUSED ON DETERMINING THE POSITIVE HEALTH IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH GREATER ACCESS TO BIKING. WE ALSO HAD FIVE STAKEHOLDER ROUND TABLES, WHICH Y'ALL WERE A PART OF, AND SOME OF Y'ALL HOSTED US AT YOUR SPACE, SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT. ONE WAS FOCUSED ON THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, ONE ON DISABILITY ACCESS ORGANIZATIONS, PARTNER CITIES, SO THOSE CITIES THAT SAN ANTONIO COMPLETELY ENVELOPS SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND UH, UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS. SO I'VE BEEN TALKING A LOT FOR THE PAST YEAR AND A HALF. THERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT, SO I'M KIND OF GONNA GO OVER SOME OF THE DELIVERABLES IN THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN. ONE OF THE FIRST AND MOST IMPORTANT THINGS WAS TO GET RIGHT WAS TO UNDERSTAND WHERE WE HAD EXISTING FACILITIES. NOT ONLY WHERE WE HAD THESE FACILITIES, BUT WHAT THESE FACILITIES WERE. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, WE BROKE THESE FACILITIES DOWN INTO DIFFERENT FACILITY TYPES. A BIKE BOULEVARD, TRADITIONAL BIKE LANE, BUFFERED BIKE LANE PROTECTED BIKE LANE, AND A SHARED USE PATH. THERE ARE OTHER KINDS OF FACILITIES IN SAN ANTONIO, BUT THIS IS HOW WE SEPARATED OUR BUCKETS. AND THIS SHOWS KIND OF A GENERAL PICTURE OF THE STATE OF CYCLING TODAY. AND THEN ONE OF THE BIG DELIVERABLES OF THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN IS OUR RECOMMENDED FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES. SO NOT ONLY DID WE RECOMMEND WHERE FACILITIES SHOULD GO, BUT WE PROVIDED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY AND EXTERNAL PARTNERS ON BEST SAFETY PRACTICES FOR BIKE DESIGN. LET ME TELL YOU WHAT'S COOL ABOUT THIS BIKE DESIGN. IT IS INNOVATIVE AND IT IS SENSITIVE TO THE LAND USE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE AREA. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE AROUND FOR THE 2011 PLAN, YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT IT PRESCRIBED A CERTAIN FACILITY FOR A CERTAIN ROADWAY. SO IT SAID ON THIS ROAD, FROM THIS POINT TO THIS POINT, YOU NEED THIS TREATMENT, WHICH WAS GREAT AT THE TIME, BUT IT ALSO MADE IT OUT OF DATE IMMEDIATELY. SO WHAT WE'VE DONE HERE IS WE HAVE OUR RECOMMENDED NETWORK, WHICH SHOWS WHERE WE NEED CONNECTIVITY. AND THEN IN ADDITION, WE HAVE OUR DESIGN GUIDANCE, WHICH GIVES MULTIPLE OPTIONS FOR DESIGN. UM, SO THAT WE ARE MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE MAKING GOOD CHOICES. THIS IS HOW WE MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE KEEPING ACCESS TO OUR CURBS, UM, AND THAT WE'RE NOT FORCING, YOU KNOW, A PROTECTED BIKE PATH DOWN, A NARROW ROADWAY WHERE THERE'S TRASH CANS AND PARKING ON BOTH SIDES. THIS REALLY HELPS US MAKE THE BEST, UH, SAFEST DECISIONS WHILE ENSURING CONNECTIVITY FOR CYCLISTS. WE ALSO HAVE SPECIAL FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS. UH, WE DO NOT HAVE A TYPICAL ROAD IN SAN ANTONIO. EVERYTHING IS WEIRD IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. SO WE HAVE TO HAVE , WE HAVE TO HAVE EXAMPLES FOR WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO IN THOSE SITUATIONS BECAUSE CYCLISTS NEED CONNECTIVITY THROUGH THESE WEIRD AREAS TOO. SOMETHING THAT WE FOCUSED ON A LOT IN OUR PLAN IS DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A BIKE BOULEVARD. A BIKE BOULEVARD IS TYPICALLY A NEIGHBORHOOD STREET WHERE BIKES AND CARS CAN SHARE THE SPACE SAFELY. THIS IS ONLY AN ACCEPTABLE CHOICE WHEN WE HAVE LOW SPEEDS AND WE DO SOME TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES TO ENSURE THOSE LOW SPEEDS. UM, BUT IN A LOT OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, THIS IS A GREAT SOLUTION BECAUSE IT DOESN'T TAKE AWAY PARKING, IT DOESN'T POUR ANY CONCRETE. UM, AND WHERE THERE'S LOW ENOUGH SPEEDS AND LOW ENOUGH VEHICLE VOLUMES, THIS MIGHT BE AN APPROPRIATE TREATMENT. WE ALSO HAVE DIFFERENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROTECTION FOR BIKE LANES. EVERYTHING FROM PARKING TO ARMADILLOS, UH, TO DELINEATORS TO PLANTERS. OH MY. AND THESE ARE ALL CONCEPTS THAT WE APPLIED IN OUR BIKE FACILITIES GUIDELINES. SO ENGINEERS AND PLANTERS. WHEN LOOKING AT, UM, THE MAP AND DECIDING WHAT TO BUILD, AT LEAST HAVE A STARTING POINT FOR DISCUSSION. WE KNOW THAT MOST OFTEN BIKE FACILITIES FAIL AT INTERSECTIONS. WE'LL HAVE A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY FOR A MILE ALONG A ROAD AND THEN A CYCLIST GETS TO AN INTERSECTION AND HAS TO TURN LEFT AND IS KIND OF LEFT DESERTED BY THAT, UH, INTERSECTION. SO WE DID SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON INTERSECTION DESIGN THAT DOES PROVIDE SAFETY TO CYCLISTS. UM, LET ME CHECK [04:45:01] MY NEXT SLIDE. OKAY. FOR INTERSECTION DESIGN THAT IS SAFETY TO CYCLISTS, TO CON UH, ENSURE THAT WE ARE GETTING THEM SAFELY ACROSS THESE INTERSECTIONS BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT'S WHERE CRASHES ARE MOST LIKELY TO HAPPEN. WE ALSO HAVE SPECIAL GUIDANCE, LIKE I SAID, NOT A NORMAL STREET IN SAN ANTONIO, UH, FOR A DA COMPLIANT PARKING WITH BIKE LANES, BUS STOPS WITH BIKE LANES. WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH VIA ON THIS AS WELL AS BIKE PARKING GUIDANCE. WE HEARD A LOT THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD BIKE IF THEY KNEW THAT THERE WAS A PLACE TO LEAVE THEIR BIKE WHEN THEY GOT THERE. UH, 'CAUSE THEY DON'T JUST WANNA LEAVE IT CHAINED UP TO A STOP SIGN OR LEANED UP IN A BUSINESS. I'VE BROUGHT MY BIKE INSIDE PLACES WHEN THEY DON'T HAVE PARKING. 'CAUSE I FEEL LIKE THAT'S THE ONLY CHOICE. UM, BUT WE HAVE CONSIDERATIONS FOR THAT AS WELL. SO SOMETHING TO NOTE ABOUT THIS GUIDANCE IS IT IS JUST THAT IT IS A RECOMMENDED DOCUMENT FOR GUIDANCE FOR THE CITY TO USE AND FOR OUR EXTERNAL PARTNERS TO USE. ADOPTION OF THE BIKE PLAN IN JANUARY DOES NOT CHANGE UDC REQUIREMENTS FOR BIKE FACILITIES. IT JUST ADOPTS THIS RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE. THIS GUIDANCE WILL BE OUR STARTING POINT WHEN WE GO THROUGH UDC AMENDMENT CHANGES IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS. BUT ADOPTION OF THE BIKE PLAN IN JANUARY DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING TO WHERE YOU MUST INSTALL THIS KIND OF PARKING PROTECTED BIKE LANE ON A CERTAIN ROAD. ALL OF THE CONNECTIONS STILL NEED TO BE VETTED INDIVIDUALLY, WHICH IS WHY WE HAVE, UM, SO MANY OPTIONS IN THE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. ALRIGHT, THE RECOMMENDED NETWORK IS A BOWL OF SPAGHETTI. UM, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ZOOM INTO THIS SPAGHETTI AND SEE AN INDIVIDUAL NOODLE, YOU'RE WELCOME TO GO ONTO OUR WEBSITE, SA BYTE NETWORK.COM. IT ISN'T A LOT OF DIFFERENT COLORS. SO WE HAVE GREEN FOR OUR, OUR EXISTING NETWORK. WE HAVE PINK FOR OUR PRIMARY NETWORK. OUR PRIMARY NETWORK IS KIND OF LIKE THE BARE MINIMUM FOR WHAT YOU NEED TO CONNECTIVITY. HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT PEOPLE HAVE A RELATIVELY LOW STRESS WAY TO GET TO SCHOOL, GET TO HEALTHCARE, GET TO HEALTHY FOOD, UH, AND GET TO WORK. WE HAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK, WHICH IS JUST LIKE IT SOUNDS, IS LOCAL AND LOW STRESS STREETS ON NEIGHBORHOOD BIKEWAYS. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR VISIONARY NETWORK. SO OUR VISIONARY NETWORK ARE ROUTES THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO CONNECTIVITY BUT MIGHT BE A LITTLE MORE DIFFICULT. IT MIGHT TAKE A LOT OF, A LOT MORE TIME. WHAT MAKES THIS CONNECTIVITY A LITTLE MORE DIFFICULT? UM, IF WE HAVE TO HANDLE A RAILROAD CROSSING, IF WE'RE GOING THROUGH MULTIPLE MUNICIPALITIES, IF WE'RE IN A FLOODPLAIN, OH, AND THERE'S PIZZA HERE EVEN BETTER. AND MY PRESENTATION COMES WITH PIZZA. UM, WE IT THAT LONG . SO THIS IS THIS RECOMMENDED NETWORK DOES LOOK SCARY WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT ALL AT ONCE. UM, BUT IT IS JUST THAT A RECOMMENDATION TO ENSURE CONNECTIVITY. EACH OF THESE PROJECTS STILL HAS TO BE VETTED WHEN THINGS COME UP. WE DID NOT SAY, YOU KNOW, ON THIS STREET, YOU MUST PROVIDE ON THIS TREATMENT. WE TRIED TO KEEP IT, UH, AS BROAD AS WE COULD TO ALLOW FOR THE BIKE PLAN TO NOT EXPIRE IMMEDIATELY WHILE STILL ENSURING SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY FOR CYCLISTS. HARLEY, THIS IS A MILLION PROJECTS. HOW ARE YOU GONNA DO THEM? UH, POTENTIALLY IN ORDER. SO WE DO HAVE PROJECT TIERS FOR THESE PROJECTS BASED ON FEASIBILITY, UM, AND KIND OF THE NEED FOR THAT. SO WE HAVE A TIER ONE PROJECTS WE ANTICIPATE WILL TAKE ONE TO FIVE YEARS TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE WAY TO TIER FOUR PROJECTS, WHICH WOULD TAKE 10 TO 25 YEARS. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT IN THE FIRST FEW YEARS OF IMPLEMENTATION, WE'RE NOT GONNA START DOING TIER FOUR PROJECTS. WE'RE NOT GONNA DO ALL THE TIER ONE PROJECTS AND THEN ALL THE TIER TWO, IT JUST SHOWS, YOU KNOW, BASED ON FEASIBILITY, WHAT WE COULD TACKLE FIRST. UM, SOME OF THE TIER FOUR PROJECTS WILL BE BOND PROJECTS OR THEY WILL BE BIG FEDERAL GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS. UM, BUT THIS JUST HELPS US GET AN IDEA OF FEASIBILITY. UH, BEFORE WE GET INTO PRICING AND SCOPING. ANOTHER KEY DELIVERABLE OF THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN IS OUR CALL POLICY CONSTRAINTS AND ACTIONS REPORT. THAT REPORT MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS ON POLICIES FOR THE CITY TO LOOK INTO UPON ADOPTION OF THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN. SO ONCE AGAIN, ADOPTION OF THE BYTE NETWORK PLAN DOES NOT CHANGE THESE POLICIES. THIS IS JUST A REVIEW OF WHAT WE'VE HEARD IN OUR PUBLIC OUTREACH, WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN LIKE CITIES AND BEST PRACTICES AND ALSO IN THE HISTORY OF SAN ANTONIO WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF WHAT WE SHOULD LOOK INTO. UH, WE'VE KIND OF BROKEN THESE UP INTO TWO GROUPS. ONE, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PEOPLE USING A BIKE AND TWO POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PEOPLE BUILDING BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE. SO WE HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING HELMET LAWS, PETTY CABS, RIDE OF WEIGHT MAINTENANCE. SOME OF IT IS JUST CITY PROCESS THEY USE. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY AN ORDINANCE, IT'S JUST HOW CAN THE CITY CLEAN UP THIS PROCESS. BUT, UH, THAT IS A DOCUMENT AVAILABLE ONLINE@SABIKENETWORK.COM AS WELL. AN IDAHO STOP, AN IDAHO STOP, AN IDAHO STOP. SO THE STATE OF IDAHO MADE IT LEGAL SO THAT, UH, CYCLISTS CAN USE A STOP SIGN AS A YIELD INSTEAD OF A FULL STOP BECAUSE STUDIES SHOW CYCLISTS ARE LESS, ARE LESS STATE. IT'S LIKE A CALIFORNIA RULE, A CALIFORNIA STOP, BUT FOR BIKES, BECAUSE CYCLISTS ARE LESS SAFE WHEN THEY HAVE TO STOP COMPLETELY AND THEN GET GOING AGAIN RATHER THAN USE IT AS A YIELD. UM, THAT'S JUST AN EXAMPLE OF, OF SOMETHING LIKE THAT. BUT THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. THANK YOU ALSO. HEY HARLEY, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT YOU'RE DOING A GOOD JOB? METRICS? WE HAVE SOME KEY METRICS FOR THE BITE NETWORK PLAN TO SHOW THAT IT'S BEING EFFECTIVE, UM, OR TO SHOW HOW WE NEED TO KIND OF REARRANGE [04:50:01] OUR GOALS. THESE METRICS ARE RELATED TO SAFETY, A NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENTS, ENGAGEMENTS, MODE SHIFTS, INTERSECTIONS IMPROVED, UM, AND HEALTH OUTCOMES AS WELL. WE KNOW THAT BETTER ACCESS TO CYCLING AND BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVES, UH, HEALTH NOT ONLY FOR THOSE ON BIKES, BUT FOR THOSE AROUND THEM. SO WE ARE MEASURING THAT INDEPENDENTLY AS PART OF OUR BIKE NETWORK PLAN. WE ALSO INCLUDE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES AND A OVERALL FUNDING PLAN FOR THIS. UH, IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE CITY BUDGET, YOU CAN SAY HARDLY. THERE'S NO WAY THE TRANSPORTATION BUDGET CAN AFFORD TO IMPLEMENT THE ENTIRE BIKE PLAN AND YOU WOULD BE CORRECT, AND THAT'S NOT THE INTENT. UH, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CITY DEPARTMENTS WHO CAN FUND THE BIKE PLAN, INCLUDING BOND. WE ALSO HAVE OUR PARTNER CITIES, BEXAR COUNTY AND T FUNDING. WE HAVE HAVE REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS AND ALSO DISCRETIONARY FUNDING WE RECEIVE AS WELL. UH, THIS DOCUMENT IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE, SO THAT WAS RAPID FIRE. LAST BUT NOT LEAST, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED BIKE PLAN TO GO TO PLANNING COMMISSION IN NOVEMBER. AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND I'M GONNA TAKE A DEEP BREATH. ALL RIGHT? YES, YOU ANY QUESTIONS? THIS IS ROBERT HANLEY. I MOVE APPROVAL OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK PLAN. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY MR. HANLEY AND A SECOND BY MS. MILAM. AND I THINK WE HAD A QUESTION OVER HERE WITH BIANCA. YES, I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. UM, THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THE PRESENTATION OUT ONLINE. UH, MY CONCERN IS OBVIOUSLY EXISTING CONDITIONS, A LOT OF PEOPLE, UM, ON YOUR EXISTING BIKE NETWORK, IT'S JUST A STRIPED LINE AT THE CURB, RIGHT? IT'S MAYBE THREE FEET OFF. AND WHAT IS GOING TO CONVEY WITH RESPECT TO SOMEONE PARKING IN THAT BIKE LANE? I THINK THAT'S, THAT'S THE BIG PIECE IS THAT PEOPLE WANT INFRASTRUCTURE, BUT THE NEED FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY AT THE CAR AT THE CURB OVERRIDES THAT. I'LL GIVE YOU A BIG EXAMPLE, UM, SPECIFICALLY AROUND SCHOOLS. SO IN YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS, WHAT ARE YOU RECOMMENDING WITH RESPECT TO SCHOOLS THAT STILL NEED THAT CURB? AND IF THERE WAS SOME TYPE OF BIKE AMENITY THERE, WHAT WOULD BE THE, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT POSES A CONFLICT? SO HOW, HOW WOULD YOU ADDRESS THAT? AND I GUESS IT CAME UP WHEN THE BIKE LANES WERE DONE BY A CHURCH. MM-HMM. THE CHURCH WANTED ACCESSIBILITY TO THE CURB AND DIDN'T WANT A PROTECTED, UM, UH, BOUNDARY IN THAT AREA. SO WHAT HAPPENS IN THOSE AREAS OF CONFLICT? UH, THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS IT DEPENDS. EVERY SCHOOL IS DIFFERENT. EVERY COMMUTE IS DIFFERENT. EVERY QUEUE FOR PICKUP AND DROP OFF IS DIFFERENT. AND THE CONNECTIVITY FOR BIKE FACILITIES IS DIFFERENT. UH, WHAT I WOULD ENCOURAGE IN THAT SITUATION, IT KINDA SEEMED LIKE A TWO PART QUESTION. THE, THE QUESTION FOR WHAT ABOUT SCHOOLS? UM, THERE WE WERE LOOKING FOR THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF SAFETY AND THE LOWEST LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS THAT WE CAN ACHIEVE WHILE STILL ENCOURAGING, UM, OR ENSURING ACCESS FOR VEHICLES AT THE CURB DEPENDING ON WHERE THAT DROP OFF IS. SO IN A LOT OF PLACES, LIKE I SAID, IF THE STREET IS VERY NARROW, IF THERE'S A TON OF TRAFFIC, IF SPEEDS ARE HIGH AND THERE'S A LOT GOING ON, SOMETIMES A PROTECTED BIKE FACILITY IS NOT YOUR BEST BET. SOMETIMES MAYBE A POLICY DIFFERENCE, LIKE MAYBE HELPING TO IMPLEMENT A BIKE BUS PROGRAM MIGHT BE A GOOD BET, UH, UH, IDEA THERE FOR STUDENTS GETTING TO AND FROM SCHOOL SOMETIMES, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON WHERE THE SCHOOL IS, THE STREET RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL IS NOT THE BEST PLAN FOR A BIKE, UH, ROUTE. WE MIGHT NEED TO LOOK AT AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE INSTEAD. AS FAR AS EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ENSURING THAT THEY ARE SAFE, WE DO HAVE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PARKING IN BIKE LANES. RIGHT NOW IT IS ACTUALLY LEGAL TO PARK IN A BIKE LANE IN SAN ANTONIO UNLESS THERE IS A SIGN SAYING OTHERWISE. UH, AND WE WORK BY ONE OF THE MOST EGREGIOUS EXAMPLES BECAUSE WE WORK IN A BUILDING RIGHT NEXT TO A DOWNTOWN CHICK-FIL-A WITH A DRIVE THROUGH. UM, THEY'RE ALWAYS, THEY'RE ALWAYS THERE. SO IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO PARK IN A BIKE LANE. IT IS ILLEGAL TO IMPEDE TRAFFIC. UH, BUT WE DO HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT PARKING IN BIKE LANES IN CERTAIN AREAS AROUND TOWN AS WELL. SO IT'S, IT'S A MULTI-PART PROCESS. SO BUILDING ON THAT POINT TO YOUR WHOLE CHICK-FIL-A EXAMPLE. I MEAN, THAT EXISTS TODAY WHERE WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT PARK IN THE BIKE LANE ALL DAY LONG. MM-HMM, , THERE'S A BIKE LANE AT LEAST. I MEAN, I CAN THINK OF A BIG EXAMPLE. IT'S A HIGH SCHOOL IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE ON TWO SIDES. THEY HAVE A BIKE LANE AND PEOPLE PARK THERE ALL DAY LONG. AND SO IT'S NEVER GOING TO BE A TRUE BIKE LANE. AND SO THEN AT WHAT POINT DO YOU COME IN AND BUILD INFRASTRUCTURE AND THEN START TICKETING PEOPLE THAT, THAT WAS MY WHOLE CONCERN IS HOW DO YOU TRANSITION, ESPECIALLY IN THESE CRITICAL SITUATIONS WHERE YOU HAVE NOT JUST VEHICULAR, BUT YOU HAVE BUS PICK UP AND DROP OFF FOR SCHOOLS AND THEN ACCESSIBILITY. THAT'S, THAT'S NEEDED. SO I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT YOUR GUIDANCE WAS IN WRITING FOR THOSE AREAS. YEAH, FOR THOSE AREAS SPECIFICALLY. AS FAR AS ENFORCEMENT, THAT IS PART OF OUR POLICY GUIDELINE. UM, OUR GUIDANCE IS NOT TO LEAVE EXISTING CONDITIONS AS IS. WE DO RECOMMEND MANY EXISTING BIKE FACILITIES FOR UPGRADES FOR EXACTLY THAT REASON. UM, BUT I CAN'T SPEAK TO A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE, BUT IT IS WITH THE LAND USE CONTEXT. IN THAT IN MIND, WE DO TALK ABOUT IF THERE'S INTERACTIONS WITH BUS, WITH [04:55:01] CAR, WITH LOTS OF PEDESTRIANS, WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE IN, IN ENSURING SAFETY, ESPECIALLY IN LIMITED RIGHT OF WAY. SO YOU'RE GONNA COORDINATE, IS THERE A RECOMMENDATION TO DO COORDINATION AND ENGAGEMENT BEFORE A FACILITY IS CHANGED? YES, THANK YOU NANA. SO, UM, SO WE, WE, UM, GOT THE LUXURY OF, OF BRINGING IN A SHARED USE PATH INTO OUR COMMUNITY. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS RECOGNIZED IS THAT OUR COMMUNITY REALLY DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE SHARED USE PATH COMING IN UNTIL IT WAS BASICALLY INTRODUCED. AND SO, SO UM, AS THOSE PATH ARE DEFINED, YOU'LL, UH, WITHIN THE COMMUNITIES YOU HAVE BETTER OUTREACH TO THE COMMUNITIES THAT ARE GONNA BE IMPACTED WOULD BE BENEFICIAL. UM, ONE OF THE THING, ONE OF THE MAIN POINTS THAT WAS BROUGHT UP FOR OUR SHARED USE PATHS WAS, UM, TWO THINGS. ONE WAS, UM, IN THE PECKING ORDER OF WHO HAS PRIORITY, UM, PEDESTRIANS COME FIRST, CORRECT. AND THEN BICYCLISTS AND THEN CARS, UM, YOU KNOW, WITH REGARDS TO SAFETY AND EVERYTHING ELSE BECAUSE WE HAVE PEOPLE JUMPING OUTTA THE WAY FROM BIKES, UH, ON THE SHARED USE PASS. AND SO, SO IS THERE DIALOGUE FOR THAT WITHIN THE, UM, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR, FOR SAFETY AND RECOGNIZING THAT PEDESTRIANS HAVE THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY AND BICYCLISTS NEXT? YES. YES. WE DO HAVE A ROBUST SAFETY AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN THROUGH OUR VISION ZERO PROGRAM. VISION ZERO IS OUR PROGRAM AIMING TO TOTALLY ELIMINATE SERIOUS INJURIES AND FATALITIES FROM TRAFFIC, INCLUDING BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONFLICTS AND FATALITIES AS WELL. SO OUTREACH IS A MAJOR COMPONENT OF NOT ONLY THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN, BUT ALL OF TRANSPORTATION'S PROGRAMS. AND THEN THE SECOND BIG THING THAT WE HAVE, UM, IS THE INTRODUCTION OF E-BIKES AND, AND POLICIES ON THAT BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT SENT TO ME THAT I'M NOT AWARE OF HAS VERY GOOD OR HAS MUCH, UH, DIALOGUE WITH REGARDS TO HOW WE'RE MANAGING AND REGULATING E-BIKES BECAUSE WE DO HAVE THEM ON OUR PATHS THAT ARE EXCEEDING TYPE TWO E-BIKES. SO I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THERE WAS CLASS LEVELS, BUT, BUT THEY'RE BEYOND CLASS TWO AND WE HAVE E-BIKES ON THE STREETS NOW AND I HAD ONE PASS ME ONE 40. AND SO, SO, SO THE QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, ON, ARE WE GONNA COME UP WITH POLICIES FOR E-BIKES HERE AS WELL JUST TO HELP, YOU KNOW, PROVIDE SOME THAT SAFETY AS WELL? YEAH, SCOOTERS, E-BIKES AND JUST, YOU KNOW, MANUAL PEDAL CYCLISTS ARE STILL HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE SPEED LIMIT. SO THEY STILL CAN, AND I HAVE SEEN THEM GET PULLED OVER AND TICKETED FOR SPEEDING, WHETHER IT BE ON A ROADWAY OR EVEN ON OUR GREENWAYS. THERE ARE SPEED LIMITS ON OUR GREENWAYS, SO THAT IS ALSO AN ENFORCEMENT EFFORT. SO AS WELL AS EDUCATION. 'CAUSE I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE MISSING IS THAT GOING ON TO ANY OF OUR TRAILS OR ANY, ANY OF THESE BIKE PATHS, WE'RE MISSING THAT, THAT COMPONENT. AND SO I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE, IT'S JUST IGNORANCE, JUST NOT KNOWING THAT THERE ARE RULES WITH REGARDS TO THAT. AND THAT'S WHY I KIND OF BROUGHT THAT UP. SO ABSOLUTELY AS WE HAVE MORE PEOPLE ATTRACTED TO CYCLING, WHICH IS WHY I HOPE FOR THE FUTURE THROUGH MAKING MORE ACCESSIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND MAKING SURE THAT WE EDUCATE, UM, CYCLISTS, PEDESTRIANS, AND A MOTORIST ON, UM, THE RULES OF THE ROAD IS GONNA BE IMPERATIVE. IS THAT IT, IS THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS ON THE BIKE PLAN? ONE QUESTION ABOUT ENGAGEMENT, BUT THAT CAN WAIT UNTIL AFTERWARDS. I DON'T MIND. OKAY. I ASK SO NOT TO TO SAY TO, TO ATTRIBUTE VALUE TO OR MORE VALUE TO ONE PROCESS OR ANOTHER, BUT I, I THINK WE HAD A CHANCE TO HEAR TWO DIFFERENT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESSES TODAY AND I WAS WONDERING IF YOU COULD HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT, WHAT YOUR MODEL WAS IN DEVELOPING THE ONE FOR THIS PROCESS. YEAH, I WILL SAY WE DID HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE TIME THAN THE TRANSPORTATION, THE, THE TOD THE TRANSIT PLAN, UH, SORRY, THE TOD UH, PROGRAM. SO THIS WAS OVER TWO A YEAR AND A HALF TO ALMOST TWO YEARS. AND WE SET, WE SET UP ENGAGEMENT AT THE VERY FOREFRONT OF THIS EVENT. UM, AND THE, THE GOAL OF ENGAGEMENT WAS TO REACH PEOPLE THAT WE WOULDN'T REACH OTHERWISE. SO LIKE I SAID, WE DIDN'T GO TO A WHOLE BUNCH OF CYCLING EVENTS. WE WENT TO FOURTH AT WOODLAWN OR WE JUST KIND OF CAMPED OUT ALONG THE GREENWAYS OR WE WENT TO, UM, MOVIE SCREENINGS AND JUST PLACES THAT WE KNEW THAT, UM, THE CONCERN PUBLIC WOULD BE IN GENERAL. SO WE ALSO HAD OUR, OUR SURVEY ONLINE AND THOSE 3,600 RESPONSES, IT WAS, IT WAS A TOUGH SURVEY. IT WAS, IT WAS A SURVEY. YOU HAD TO ZOOM INTO A MAP AND CHOOSE YOUR AREA AND SHARE YOUR CONCERNS. SO WE REALLY DID ASK A LOT OF THE COMMUNITY THAT GAVE US THIS FEEDBACK. WE ALSO HAD OPEN HOUSES WHERE PEOPLE WHO, UH, COULD COME IN AND POINT AT OUR MAPS AND ASK US QUESTIONS AND DO THINGS LIKE THAT. SO THOSE 43 EVENTS WE ATTENDED, WE EVEN HAD TWO THAT WE HOSTED INDIVIDUALLY. UM, SO THE GOAL REALLY WAS ONCE WE SET UP THE THREE PHASES, UM, WAS TO CONSTANTLY CHECK IN AND ASK OUR, THE QUESTION, WHO ARE WE MISSING? WHO ARE WE MISSING GEOGRAPHICALLY, DEMOGRAPHICALLY, THROUGHOUT SAN ANTONIO AND TARGET THAT AREA OR THAT GROUP TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE, UH, AS MUCH OF A REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME AS WE COULD. OKAY. THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YES. AWESOME. [05:00:02] BIANCA, HELLO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UM, REGARDING YOUR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT THAT YOU DID, I, YOU KNOW, I WENT THROUGH THE MAP AND SO FORTH AND SO THERE WASN'T A LINK FOR THE MAP, UM, ON THE NOTIFICATION THAT WENT OUT. SO IS THERE A MAP THAT ACCOMPANIES ALL THESE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE RECOMMENDED NETWORK? CORRECT. YES. THE RECOMMENDED NETWORK IS ON OUR WEBSITE, SA BIKE NETWORK.COM. UM, IF YOU LOOK IN THE TOP CORNER, WHICH MURRAY IS PULLING UP FEVERISHLY, THANK YOU, UH, VIEW OUR DRAFT NETWORK, YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND CLICK ON THAT AND THAT SHOWS THE DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NETWORK. THERE'S LOTS OF DIFFERENT, THIS IS KIND OF OUR, OUR COLOR SCHEME. THERE'S DIFFERENT LAYERS YOU CAN TURN ON AND OFF STARTING WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. UM, SO IF YOU CLICK ONE OF THOSE EYES OVER THERE, MURRAY, THERE YOU GO, IT'LL SHOW DIFFERENT THINGS. SO THIS IS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK. IT'LL, SO YOU COULD SEE THE FULL SPAGHETTI BOWL OR YOU CAN SEE THE SPAGHETTI BOWL IN YOUR, YOUR AREA OF INTEREST. SO I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO SHARE THIS WHEN IT GETS NOTICED OUT. AGAIN AS A HOUSEKEEPING ISSUE, IT SHOULD BE A PART OF THE MEMO SO THAT PEOPLE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO AND LOOK AT IT. OBVIOUSLY NOBODY'S SICK STUCK AROUND A NIGHT TO COMMENT ABOUT IT, BUT WHEN I WAS LOOKING FOR IT, I WAS, IT WAS VERY HARD TO FIND ESSENTIALLY BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PART OF OUR NOTIFICATION PACKET. UM, NOT THAT WE'RE, WE'RE NOT APPROVING ANY OF THIS NETWORK PER SE. WE'RE ONLY APPROVING THE LANGUAGE IN THE POWERPOINT. IS THAT CORRECT? 'CAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ANY UDC LANGUAGE IN FRONT OF US. I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE ACTIONABLE ITEM FOR TODAY. THANK YOU. THIS IS ROBERT HANLEY. HARLEY IN THIS A WE'RE PROVING THE BICYCLE NETWORK PLAN THEN IT'S UP TO US AT THIS COMMITTEE AT A LATER DATE, BIANCA, TO HOW DOES THIS, UH, HOW IS THIS FIT INTO THE UDC? BECAUSE THE EXISTING UDC ADOPTED THE 2011 BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE, UH, EVEN ON THE ROUTES THAT WERE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CITY ON THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN BECAME REQUIREMENTS FOR ANYBODY DEVELOPING IN THOSE AREAS. AND THEY WERE TRYING TO WEED SOME OF THAT OUT. BUT OUR CHARGES TO APPROVE THIS AND THEN AT A LATER PROCESS IS HOW DO WE IMPLEMENT IT IN THE UDC? RIGHT? THERE'S TWO STEPS. SO BECAUSE THE BIKE MASTER PLAN AND THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN NOW IS PART OF THE, IT'S A COMPONENT OF THE CITY'S MASTER PLAN. THAT'S WHY THE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE'S, UH, PURVIEW IN THIS FIRST STEP IS TO, UH, IS TO APPROVE AND ADOPT OR RECOMMEND THAT THE, UH, THAT THE PROPOSED BIKE NETWORK PLAN THAT INCLUDES ALL OF THESE COMPONENTS THAT HARLEY WENT OVER MOVE FORWARD TO PLANNING COMMISSION. THE SECOND PHASE OR AS WE HAVE, WE HAVE THE IMPLEMENTATION RIGHT, RIGHT NOW IS ADOPT THE PLAN, THEN WE HAVE TO MOVE INTO IMPLEMENTATION. AND IMPLEMENTATION MEANS TAKING THE FACILITY GUIDANCE THAT SHE WENT OVER AND THEN WORKING WITH, UM, STAKEHOLDERS AS PART OF THAT PROCESS TO RECOMMEND AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH THEN COMES BACK TO THE P TAC AND GOES THROUGH THAT PROCESS AS WELL. OH, AND WE DID PUT THE LINK, UM, ON THE MEMO ITSELF, SO I DIDN'T FIND IT. I DIDN'T YEAH, IT WAS, I THINK IT WAS IN, IT WAS THERE. I SAW IT. OKAY. ALRIGHT. I MIGHT JUST HAVE TO LIKE MAYBE HIGHLIGHT IT OR SOMETHING. OKAY. YEAH, WE CAN, WE CAN SEND A FOLLOW UP WITH MORE DETAILED AND DIRECT LINKS FOR, FOR Y'ALL TO REVIEW FOR SURE. I MEAN, I WOULD'VE THOUGHT WE WOULD'VE HAD MORE PEOPLE WHO WOULD AT LEAST COMMENTED BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF PARTICIPATION THAT HAS OCCURRED IN THE PAST ABOUT THE BIKE. WE DID ACTUALLY HAVE ONE COMMENT SUBMITTED. JOEY LIC FROM ACTIVATE US DAY LEFT A LIT WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR, UH, THIS ITEM AS WELL AS THE TOD ITEM. I WASN'T SURE IF THAT WAS GONNA BE READ SEPARATELY, BUT WE DID RECEIVE ONE COMMENT, UM, FOR, FOR THAT. I'VE NEVER NOT SEEN THEM COMMENT ON SOMETHING THAT I'M JUST ASTONISHED THAT WE DON'T HAVE A LARGER AMOUNT OF TURNOUT TO BE HONEST. YEAH, WE DID DO A LOT OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND WE DID LET ALL OF OUR STAKEHOLDER GROUPS KNOW THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE HERE THIS EVENING. UM, I MEAN WE'VE RECEIVED REALLY GREAT FEEDBACK FROM THEM AND REALLY GREAT SUPPORT FROM LOTS OF GROUPS OR OUT SAN ANTONIO, IF WE DIDN'T TELL 'EM THERE WAS GONNA BE PIZZA, THEY MAY HAVE SHOWN UP. I KNOW IF WE YEAH, THAT'S TRUE. ONLY IF YOU'RE HERE FOR FOUR HOURS. YEAH, YEAH, RIGHT. IF YOU STAY TILL FIVE AND EAT PIZZA, THEN WE HAVE YOUR COMMENT. YEAH. OKAY. ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THE BIKE PLAN? YOU SAID THE RECOMMENDATION WAS TO CONVERT, UH, BROADWAY COMPLETELY TO BIKE USE. IS THAT RIGHT? NO COMMENT. , BUT I ACTUALLY THAT DOES GIVE ME A GOOD POINT. YOU'LL SEE OUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONNECTIVITY, FOCUS ON CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINED ROADS. UM, WE TRIED TO SECURE PRIMARY CONNECTIVITY ON ROADS THAT THE CITY OWNS. SO WE ARE NOT RELYING ON ROADS, UH, MAINTAINED BY OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, THE COUNTY OR T.TO ENSURE THAT CONNECTIVITY. UH, WE DO HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THOSE ROADS, BUT OUR PRIMARY NETWORK AND PRIMARY MODES OF CONNECTIVITY TO KEY DESTINATIONS LIKE EDUCATION, HEALTH, HEALTHY FOODS, ET CETERA, DO NOT RELY ON FACILITIES THAT THE CITY DOES NOT OWN AND [05:05:01] MAINTAIN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL . WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF THE BIKE MASTER PLAN, NETWORK PLAN. UM, CAN STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL VOTE AND WE DO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT. THIS WAS A WRITTEN STATEMENT LEFT BY JOEY P*****K AND I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND READ IT INTO THE RECORD. OKAY. MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE. MY NAME IS JOEY P*****K AND I AM HERE TODAY TO EXPRESS MY STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF OF THE PROPOSED BIKE NETWORK PLAN. THE BIKE NETWORK PLAN CREATES FOCUS AND SAFE CORRIDORS THAT LEAD TO OUR GREENWAY NETWORK TRUNK ROUTES AND OTHER NECESSARY DAILY DESTINATIONS ADDRESSES POLICY ISSUES LIKE PARKING AND BIKE LANES, IDENTIFIES FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES, AND PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON PURCHASING OF BUILDING THE BIKE NETWORK. WE ARE EXCITED THAT THIS BIKE NETWORK PLAN IS A RESULT OF EXTENSIVE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AT TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, PROVIDING A STRONGER ROADMAP TO CREATE A MORE CONNECTIVE, COMFORTABLE, EQUITABLE, RESILIENT, AND SAFE BIKE NETWORK FOR ALL SAN ANTONIONS AND USERS OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. WHILE I AM UP HERE TODAY AS AN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AS ACTIVATE SA, A NON-PROFIT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION, I AM ALSO HERE AS A YOUNG FATHER WHO HOPES TO ONE DAY PROVIDE, FEEL COMFORTABLE AND CONFIDENT AND ENCOURAGING MY DAUGHTER TO BIKE TO PLACES THAT SHE WANTS TO GO NEAR AND FAR IN SAN ANTONIO. I THINK THAT THIS NEW BIKE NETWORK PLAN WILL HELP US MOVE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION OF CREATING A, A BIKE NETWORK THAT IS TRULY BUILT FOR PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND DEDICATION TO OUR VIBRANT CITY. JOEY P*****K. IS THAT A APPLAUSE? I THOUGHT THAT WAS A APPLAUSE. A WAS. I WAS LIKE, YES, . OKAY. THANK YOU. IS THAT ALL THE PUBLIC COMMENT YOU HAVE? YES. OKAY. WE'LL DO THE, UH, ROLL CALL, VOTE NOW. MR. HOWLEY? YES. MS. MILAM? YES. MR. SIPES? YES. MR. PIERCE? YES. THANK YOU. MR. FULLERTON? YES. MR. RAZA? YES. MR. MANA? YES. MS. MALDONADO? YES. MS. MEYER? YES. MS. KAREN DICKER? YES. MR. HOWELL? YES. MR. WHITE? YES. CHAIR PECK? YES. MOTION CARRIES. GREAT. LAST [Old Business  ] ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE MINUTES FROM, UH, WELL, I DON'T KNOW WHEN THEY WERE FROM MAY 13TH. SO MOVED. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY A WAS BIANCA RIGHT? YES. OKAY, SECOND AND A SECOND BY CHRISTOPHER FULLERTON. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ANYTHING ELSE FROM STAFF? NO OTHER ITEMS. GREAT. IT IS, I HAVE A COMMENT REAL QUICK. OKAY. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT THE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION THAT WAS PRESENTED FOR THE TODD ITEM BE LOADED TO ESSAY SPEAK UP BECAUSE IT WASN'T LOADED, JUST SO EVERYBODY HAS ACCESS TO IT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU BIANCA. IT IS SIX 18 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. I JUST WANNA SAY THE BUILDING IS CLOSED, SO EVERYBODY DOES NEED TO EXIT THE BUILDING. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.