* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:02] ALL RIGHT, EVERYBODY. STAFF, LET ME KNOW IF WE'RE READY AND RECORDING. OKAY? OKAY, EVERYBODY, LET'S CALL THE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10TH, UH, PC T MEETING TO ORDER. WOULD STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL? MR. LOPEZ. MS. MILAM? MR. ZUKI? MR. SIPES? HERE. HOW'S IT GOING? MR. BARROS? MS. BRAGMAN. MS. CRUZ? HERE. MS. WAX PACK. MS. KOHAN? HIM? MR. ELDER? MS. FAIRMONT? HERE. MR. MOORE. MS. FLAGGINGS? HERE. MS. TACKETT? MR. NLA? MR. MATNEY? MR. TAYLOR? HERE. MR. OSA? MR. HANLEY? HERE. MR. ROBINSON? HERE. MR. DOMINGUEZ? HERE. MR. PIERCE. MR. FULLERTON? HERE. MS. BAYES? MR. ESTRADA? MR. MANNA? PRESENT. MS. MALDONADO? HERE. MS. DALE. MS. MEYER? HERE. MR. ANDERSON? HERE. MS. KAREN DECKER? HERE. MR. HOW? HERE. HERE. MR. WHITE. MR. BROWN? HERE. CHAIR. PICK HERE. DO WE HAVE QUORUM? A QUORUM IS PRESENT. GREAT. THANK YOU. WE ALSO HAVE A SPANISH ENGLISH INTERPRETERS. YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I THINK BIANCA HAS A QUESTION FOR STAFF. YES. THANK YOU, CHAIR. UM, I WOULD LIKE STAFF TO COMMENT ON A SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSION THAT OCCURRED SINCE OUR LAST MEETING REGARDING P TAX ABILITY TO CREATE SUBCOMMITTEES. UM, LOGAN, IF YOU COULD COMMENT PLEASE. THANK YOU. YES. THE PC TAX IS ALLOWED TO CREATE SUBCOMMITTEES. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. UH, MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENT. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES THAT HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK OR WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS OR ANY OTHER ITEM? THERE'S NO CITIZENS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. GREAT, THANK YOU. OKAY, WE'LL MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS. UM, I GUESS STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. GOOD MORNING, C COMMITTEE MEMBERS. UH, TODAY WE'RE HERE TO DISCUSS WITH YOU A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR KELLY PARKWAY. I'M ISAAC LEVY. I'M THE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER AT THE SE, UH, IT'S THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. SO JUST TO GIVE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY, IT IS, WE ARE DISCUSSING KELLY PARKWAY OVER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN, UH, IN COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE. UH, IT IS A SUPER ARTERIAL TYPE A REQUIRING 200 TO 250 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY. IT IS SURROUNDED BY MIXED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS MI ONE. AND THE NEAREST MAJOR ROADS IS PLEASANTON ROAD, WHICH IS 1.1 MILES TO THE EAST AND, UH, OR APPLEWHITE ROAD, WHICH IS ONE MORE, 1.1 MILES TO THE WEST AND PLEASANTON ROAD, WHICH IS 1.6 MILES TO THE EAST. THE APPLICANT FOR THIS MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT [00:05:01] IS TRACKED CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP, UH, THEIR REPRESENTATIVES BEING CHRIS SHANDOR AND MITCH NELSON, WHO IS HERE TODAY IN ATTENDANCE. UM, ALSO WITH, THEY'RE WORKING WITH WGI, UH, RUSSELL YEAGER AND HIS TEAM. UH, THE REQUEST IS TO RELY ON PROPOSED SEGMENT OF KELLY PARKWAY, UM, WHICH IS A SUPER ARTERIAL TYPE A REQUIRING 200 TO 250 FEET OF RIGHT AWAY. UM, THE LIMITS ARE APPRO FROM APPROXIMATELY 1.6 MILES EAST OF PLEASANTON ROAD TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE OF 1322 MALMAN ROAD, WHICH YOU CAN SEE IS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED. UM, THE EXISTING LAND USES, UH, THAT ARE SURROUNDING IT IS RANCH, LAND, LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL USE, AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AS WELL AS A AERIAL TOWER THAT'S USED FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS. UM, THE AMENDED, I MEAN, SO THE CURRENT LINE FOR KELLY PARKWAY IS THE PINK LINE THAT YOU WERE SEEING ON THE IMAGE, AND THEN THE AMENDED LINE WOULD BE THE YELLOW LINE THAT KIND OF FO FOLLOWS MY ARMON ROAD AND THEN MAKES A SOUTHWESTERLY JOG TO KIND OF GO KIND OF HEAD BACK TOWARDS, UH, KELLY PARKWAY. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE IN THE SATELLITE VIEW, YOUR RED HIGHLIGHTED AREA IS 1322 MARMAN ROAD. UM, BY ALL MEANS, PLEASE DISREGARD THAT ARROW RIGHT THERE AS IT'S NOT POINTING TO A ROAD IN PARTICULAR IS JUST HOW ADOBE KIND OF HAD IT. UM, THAT ON THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THAT OF 1322 AUMAN ROAD IS, UH, MALMAN ROAD ITSELF. UM, OVER TO THE WEST, YOU SEE APPLEWHITE ROAD, AND THEN FURTHER TO THE WEST IS ZAMO STREET. HERE YOU CAN SEE A EAST VIEW OF THE PROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT. UM, YOU'RE KIND OF SHOWING TOWARDS THE EAST WHERE MALMAN ROAD AND PROPOSED KELLY PARKWAY WOULD CONVERGE. HERE WE'RE SHOWING A SOUTH VIEW ONTO 1322, UH, 1322 AUMAN ROAD, WHERE IT'S SHOWING WHERE THE MAJOR, WHERE AMENDMENT WILL TAKE PLACE, WHERE MOST OF THE REALIGNMENT WOULD BE, UM, SOUTH OF THIS POINT, UH, WHICH IS WHERE, WHICH IS WHERE, UH, KELLY ROAD AND MALMAN ROAD, UH, KELLY PARKWAY AND MALMAN ROAD WOULD DIVERGE FROM EACH OTHER. SOUTH AT THIS POINT IS WHERE IT STARTS KIND OF HEADING TOWARDS SOUTHWEST OR IN THIS IMAGE TO THE RIGHT. AND THEN ALSO TOO, WE HAVE A WEST VIEW WHERE IT SHOWS THE START OF THE PROPOSED, UH, REALIGNMENT, UH, UH, LOOKING WEST ALONG MALMAN ROAD. AND I GUESS HERE WE CAN GO OVER SWITCH OVER TO THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. GOOD MORNING. UH, MY NAME IS RUSSELL YEAGER. I'LL BE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU GUYS FOR YOUR TIME THIS MORNING. UH, JUST A COUPLE OF NOTES THAT WE WANTED TO ADD HERE. UH, WE ARE SEEKING TO REALIGN THE KELLY PARKWAY CONNECTOR SIMPLY WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS OF THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. UH, THERE ARE TWO OWNERS THAT WILL BE IMPACTED IN THE FUTURE BY CHANGES TO THE DEDICATION, UH, THAT WILL BE ALIGNED IF THEIR PROPERTIES COME UP FOR DEVELOPMENT OR PLATTING. UH, THAT IS THE SAWS TO THE EAST, UH, SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TODAY. AND THEN VERANO LAND GROUP TO THE NORTH. BOTH, UH, HAVE BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH US AND OUR TEAM FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND HAVE APPROVED THIS REALIGNMENT. WE HAVE WRITTEN LETTERS OF BOTH OF THOSE APPROVALS, UH, THAT HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO STAFF. UM, SO THE THREE, UH, THE APPLICANT AND THESE TWO ARE ALIGNED WITH THIS CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT. UM, WE ALSO WANTED YOU GUYS TO KNOW THAT WE TOOK INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG-TERM DESIGN OF THIS ROADWAY INTO THE DESIGN SPEEDS AND THE, THE EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT WAS GONNA BE NEEDED FOR A FUTURE 200 TO 250 FOOT WIDE SUPER ARTERIAL, UH, AT 60 MILES PER HOUR. UH, THIS WAS ALL REVIEWED WITH TDOT, ALONG WITH THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WITH TRANSPORTATION TO ENSURE THAT THE, THE ALIGNMENT MET FUTURE ALIGNMENT STANDARDS FOR, UH, A LARGE ARTERIAL LIKE THIS. UH, YOU CAN SEE THERE IN THE PICTURE WE TRY TO ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT, ALTHOUGH IT'S STILL KIND OF SMALL HERE ON THE SCREEN. BUT THOSE ARE THE TWO CHANGES IN DEDICATION, UH, FOR VERANO AND FOR, UH, SAWS THAT WILL BE ADJUSTED. SO, UM, THIS IS THE SLIDE OVERALL. YOU CAN SEE THE, THE, THE ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT, UM, AND HOW WE'VE REDUCED IT TO JUST THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. UM, AND I'LL TURN IT BACK OVER TO ISAAC AND HIS TEAM. WE'LL BE HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AT THE END. THANK YOU, RUSSELL. UM, SO FACTORS CONSIDERED FOR THIS REALIGNMENT. UM, THE AMENDMENT IS REQUESTED WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE, ALTHOUGH THE WESTERN END OF THIS AMENDMENT ENDS AT THE COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE AND FOUR, UM, THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT, UH, IS WHILE ADJACENT TO A FEMA DESIGNED OR DESIGNATED 100 A YEAR FLOODPLAIN. IT DOES NOT, UH, GO THROUGH, IT DOES NOT CROSS THROUGH THE FLOODPLAIN, UM, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND TEXDOT, AS OF RIGHT NOW, DOES NOT HAVE ANY PLANS TO CON TO DESIGN OR CONSTRUCT KELLY PARKWAY IN GENERAL, ALTHOUGH WE ARE AWARE OF PLANS TO CREATE A EAST WEST CONNECTOR ON THAT SOUTHWEST SIDE OF TOWN, I MEAN SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN, UM, SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY, DSD PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND OTHER TECHNICAL REVIEWING AGENCIES HAVE NO OBJECTION, OBJECTION TO THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, UM, THEREFORE THE RECOMMENDATION FROM TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. OUR TIMELINE AND NEXT STEPS, UH, IS OBVIOUSLY [00:10:01] RIGHT NOW WE'RE PLANNING COMMISSION. WE PLAN, UH, PLANNING COMM TECHNICAL ADVISOR COMMITTEE. WE PLAN ON GOING TO PLANNING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 26TH, AND THEN CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 20TH, SINCE THERE ISN'T A MEETING FOR THE, I BELIEVE IT WAS THE SIXTH AND THE 13TH. SO, AND NOW WE OPEN THE FLOOR UP FOR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL MOVE ON TO QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE, I GUESS. UH, QUESTION. YEAH, GO AHEAD. SO QUESTION FOR CITY. SO, UM, DO WE HAVE A SIMILAR, UM, ARTERIAL ALREADY DEFINED THAT HAS SIMILAR TURNS OR BENDS? UM, YOU KNOW, WHERE THIS KIND OF MATCHES THAT? SO KIND OF, SO I CAN KIND OF PUT MY HEAD AROUND KELLY KIND OF TURNS THOSE ARE, UH, SO KELLY PARKWAY IS PROBABLY MOST COMPARABLE TO WHERE ABOUT PARKWAY AND THE NORTH SIDE. MM-HMM. WHICH IS ALSO, I BELIEVE IS A, UH, SUPER ARTERIAL TYPE A. AND WE HAVE SIMILAR TURNS ALREADY ON, ON THAT PARKWAY AS WELL, CORRECT? CORRECT. YES, SIR. YCA, YES. THANK YOU. UM, I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. FIRST ONE, WHEN YOU SAID SARAH REVIEWED THIS, I'M ASSUMING THEY REVIEWED IT AGAINST THE DRAFT MAPS FOR THE A HUNDRED YEAR FLOODPLAIN SINCE THERE'S BEEN SUBMISSIONS FOR CHANGES FLOOD? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. AND THEN NUMBER TWO, YOU MENTIONED THAT THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WERE DIRECTLY AFFECTED, YOU HAD, THERE WERE LETTERS OF SUPPORT THAT THE APPLICANT MENTIONED. WILL THOSE BE A PART OF THE PACKET AS IT MOVES FORWARD THROUGH THE PROCESS? YES, THAT'S CORRECT. THEY WOULD BE PART OF THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION PACKET. OKAY. THANK YOU. MM-HMM . WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THE CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT? UM, WHICH PERSON? SO, UM, ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, UM, THE ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT BIFURCATED THE PROPERTY IN A WAY THAT CREATED TWO MAJOR THOROUGHFARES, ONE ON THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH, AND MADE THE PROPERTY PRETTY DIFFICULT TO DEVELOP. SO THE INTENTION HERE WAS TO TRY AND ALIGN THOSE TWO MORE QUICKLY. SO TO GET THE NEW EAST WEST CONNECTOR, UH, OR KELLY PARKWAY UP TO MALMAN ROAD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT YOU COULD END UP WITH A TRACK THAT WAS MORE DEVELOPABLE TO THE SOUTH. OKAY. DID THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YES. OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE NOW WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. I SUBMITTED. YOU HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY BIANCA ROBERT HANLEY. SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND. UH, LET'S DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE PLEASE. MS. MALDONADO? YES. MR. HANLEY? YES. MR. SIPES? YES. MS. CRUZ? YES. MS. FAIRMONT? YES. MS. FLAS? YES. MR. TAYLOR? YES. MR. ROBERTSON? YES. MR. DOMINGUEZ? YES. MR. FULLERTON? YES. MR. MANNA? YES. MS. MEYER? YES. MR. ANDERSON? YES. MS. KAREN DYER? YES. MR. HOW? YES. MR. BROWN? I DON'T GET THE VOTE. EXPERIENCE CHAIR, PICK. YES. MOTION PASSES. GREAT. ALL RIGHT. UH, THAT BEING THE ONLY NEW BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA, WE'LL GO TO OLD BUSINESS, WHICH IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. UM, I DID NOTICE A COUPLE OF SMALL EDITS ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE MINUTES. UM, IT SAYS MONDAY, OCTOBER 14TH, AND IT SAYS 9:00 AM I BELIEVE THE MEETING STARTED AT 1:00 PM AND THEN DOWN BELOW IT SAYS 1:00 AM CALL TO ORDER SHOULD BE 1:00 PM CALL TO ORDER. I FELT LIKE WE WERE HERE TILL 1:00 AM . THANK YOU. STAFF WILL MAKE THE EDITS. GREAT. THANK YOU. IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE MINUTES, ENTERTAIN A MOTION. ROBERT HANLEY, MOVE APPROVAL. MOTION FOR APPROVAL? WE HAVE A SECOND, SECOND AND A SECOND BY MR. MANNA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT. UH, THAT IS ALL WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA TODAY. AGENDA TODAY. DOES STAFF HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? UH, NO OTHER ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. IT IS NINE 15 AND WE'RE ADJOURN. GET YOUR MORNING BACK. . IT TOOK LONG TO GET HERE. IT TOOK 45 MINUTES TO GET HERE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.