[00:00:03]
IT IS TWO O'CLOCK AND WE WILL CALL THE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26TH, 2025.
ME PLANNING, COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER WITH STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL.
CAN WE HAVE THE SPANISH ENGLISH INTERPRETER? THANK YOU.
UH, TODAY WE HAVE TWO AGENDAS.
THINGS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE ITEMS WHERE, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY MORE DETAILED DISCUSSION AND NO ONE HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM.
THE SECOND AGENDA IS THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.
UH, THOSE CASES WILL BE HEARD AS STATED INDIVIDUALLY, AND THEY ARE, ANY ITEM THAT'S NOT ON CONSENT WILL BE ON INDIVIDUAL THE WAY IT LOOKS RIGHT NOW.
EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOR ITEMS 4, 6, 7.
AND WHAT IS THE MINUTES? NINE IS ON CONSENT.
IS THERE ANY, UH, DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONSENT AGENDA QUESTIONS? AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA.
WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION STILL PASSES FOR APPROVAL.
[Variances ]
RIGHT.UH, COMMISSIONER BUSTA MONTE IS RECUSING FROM THIS ITEM.
IT'S 2 0 3 AND HE HAS LEFT THE ROOM.
UH, HERE, UH, FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR, VARIANCE TO THE TREE PRESERVATION.
IN REFERENCE TO TREE APP, A PP 2 2 3 8 8 0 1 9 1 3, UH, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE FIVE, SECTION 5 35 5 23 H 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN STATES THAT SIGNIFICANT TREES SHALL BE PRESERVED AT 80% PRESERVATION WITHIN BOTH THE A HUNDRED YEAR FLOOD PLAINS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS.
HERITAGE TREES SHALL BE PRESERVED AT 100% HARDSHIP.
UM, REVISION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TO THE TREE PLAN, UH, REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SIGN LARGE SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE REMOVED, UH, BEYOND WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DUE TO THE TREES BEING EITHER DEAD, DYING IN DECLINE, AND IT AFFECTED THAT, UH, UH, DUE TO A RECENT TREE INSPECTION, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL FOR, UH, PROJECT EXCEEDING MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS.
MARK? UM, I GUESS THE APPLICANT PROBABLY IS NOT HERE, RIGHT? 'CAUSE IT WAS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
DO YOU NEED TO ADDRESS ANYTHING? OKAY.
UH, IS THERE ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER FOUR? NO.
THE PROJECT MEETS THE MITIGATION IS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCE.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER, PROFIT STAFF.
IT IS 2 0 5 AND COMMISSIONER BUSANTE HAS REENTERED THE MEETING.
[Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments ]
UH, ITEM NUMBER SIX,[00:05:02]
GOOD AFTERNOON.MY NAME IS SAMANTHA BENAVIDEZ, PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
ITEM NUMBER SIX IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE PORT SAN ANTONIO AREA REGIONAL CENTER PLAN FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO URBAN LOAD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT 2 4 3 5 RIO CITY ROAD.
THERE WERE 18 NOTICES MAILED ONE IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED WITHIN 200 FEET.
THOMPSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GAVE NO RESPONSE.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO A PLAN AMENDMENT TO URBAN LOAD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO REZONE TO OUR FOUR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT.
GIVEN THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION WITHIN PROXIMITY.
STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUEST IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USES ABUTTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
ALTHOUGH THERE IS LAND USE DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEARBY, IT IS LOCATED WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH, NOT ALONG FOR YOUR CITY ROAD ON A COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION.
APPLICANT LIKE TO APPROACH THE PODIUM AND THEN JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.
DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS FOR THE COMMISSION? NO, NONE AT ALL.
I MEAN, IT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT SHE SAID AND THAT'S IT.
UM, WE'LL MOVE ON TO COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
WE WILL START ON THE LEFT WITH COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.
CAN YOU COME BACK UP PLEASE? UH, WHAT, WHAT'S YOUR LAST NAME, SIR? ALONSO.
MR. ALONSO, UH, WHAT IS YOUR PLAN WITH THIS PROPERTY? SO THE PLAN IS, UH, MY DAD WANTED TO BUILD A HOUSE FOR MY SISTER, GIVEN THAT HE'S GETTING OLDER AND, UM, THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT.
JUST WANTED TO HAVE A STABLE PLACE FOR HER IN HER CASE.
AND AND YOUR DAD LIVES ON THE PROPERTY OR THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR CURRENTLY? CORRECT.
SO THIS WOULD BE A REZONING THAT WOULD ALLOW YOUR DAD TO REMAIN IN PLACE, CORRECT.
TELL ME ABOUT FRIO CITY ROAD RIGHT IN FRONT OF THAT HOUSE, IF YOU COULD, WHAT IS IT LIKE, IS IT PAVED? DO YOU GET A LOT OF TRAFFIC? HONESTLY, THERE'S NO TRAFFIC 'CAUSE IT'S LITERALLY A DEAD END.
UM, THE ONLY THING THERE IS REALLY IS THE TRAIN, BUT I MEAN, YOU GET ACCUSTOMED TO THAT AS YOU KNOW, AS I, I WAS LITTLE GROWING UP THERE.
SO YOU GET ACCUSTOMED TO THE NOISE.
HOW LONG HAS YOUR DAD LIVED IN THAT HOUSE? UH, WE'VE BEEN THERE FOR 35 YEARS.
AND YOU GREW UP THERE, CORRECT? WHEN WAS THAT, SIR? UH, SINCE THE AGE OF TWO I WAS THERE.
WHAT YEAR WAS THAT APPROXIMATELY? LIKE, FORGIVE ME FOR BEING MARRIED.
NO FURTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, COMMISSIONER LOPEZ.
NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, BUT I, YOU KNOW, I DO FIND IT INTERESTING, AND THIS IS MAYBE ONE OF THOSE UNIQUE SITUATIONS WHERE, WHERE THE, YOU KNOW, THE RULES THAT WE'RE REVIEWING, YOU KNOW, ARE FOCUSED ON, ON SOME BROADER LAND PLANNING.
BUT WHEN IT DOES COME TO A FAMILY CIRCUMSTANCE THAT, THAT, UM, THAT KIND OF MATCHES THE GOALS THAT I THINK THE CITY AND US PROBABLY INDIVIDUALLY ARE FOCUSED ON, IT'S OCCURS TO ME THAT MAYBE THIS IS ONE OF THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE AN AN EXCEPTION SHOULD BE MADE.
SO I'M INTERESTED IN HEARING THE OTHER COMMISSIONER'S VIEW ON IT.
COMMISSIONER GARCIA, I HAVE NO QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER FAULKNER? I HAVE ONE MORE FIRST STAFF IS THAT IF THIS WAS TO BE APPROVED AND THEY NO LONGER WERE LIVING THERE, WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF WHAT THAT LAND USE WOULD, UM, BE AFFECTED BY? ARE THERE ANY IMPACTS, LIKE, WOULD THEY STILL BE ABLE TO DO THE RESIDENTIAL AND YES.
SO THEY ACTUALLY ARE TRYING TO GO FOR URBAN LOAD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
SO THAT DOES PERMIT A LOT OF YOUR RESIDENTIAL USES, BUT I ALSO BELIEVE ALLOWS AN NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USE.
AND THANK YOU FOR COMING UP TO SPEAK TO US BECAUSE IT SOUNDS REALLY DIFFERENTLY WHEN WE DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR PLAN IS AND DON'T KNOW THAT YOUR FAMILY HAS BEEN THERE AND LIVED THERE.
SO IT, IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
SO THANK YOU FOR COMING UP AGAIN, ECHO THE COMMENTS MADE BY MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, UH, PUTTING, WE SEE THINGS IN BLACK AND WHITE AND DON'T ALWAYS PUT THE HUMAN ASPECT TO IT OR GET THE WHOLE STORY.
UM, THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF THE SITUATIONS WHERE STAFF, STUDENTS AND THEIR JOB, UM, AND WE HAVE THIS BODY TO LOOK AT SITUATIONS LIKE THIS AND MAKE, MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL.
[00:10:03]
UM, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.I HAVE NO MORE QUESTIONS EITHER, BUT ECHO SOME OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONER'S THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM.
SO THANK YOU FOR COMING TODAY.
UM, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION? DISCUSSION? SORRY, JUST BRIEFLY.
UM, YOU KNOW, IN THIS CASE, UH, THIS IS DISTRICT FIVE.
WE HAVE URBAN LOW DENSITY, I'M SORRY, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL JUST WITHIN 200 FEET.
I MEAN, IT'S WITHIN THE NOTICE RANGE.
UM, ALTHOUGH FRIO CITY ROAD IS A PRIMARY ARTERIAL NOT HERE.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS? UH, MOVE TO APPROVE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT AND I, IT WAS A TIE.
COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, COMMISSIONER MILAN, ONE OF THE TWO STAFF.
COMMISSIONER BUSTA BUSTAMANTE.
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, ALEX RATANA, PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE KELLY SOUTH SAN PUEBLO COMMUNITY PLAN.
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 38 0 3 SOUTHWEST MILITARY DRIVE.
THERE WERE 27 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO POSED WITHIN 200 FEET.
AND QUINTANA COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GAVE NO RESPONSE.
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS REQUESTED TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO SEE THREE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
THE PROPOSED REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE ACCOMMODATES HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USES WITH TYPICAL PROPERTY SIZES OF 20 ACRES OR GREATER IN SIZE, MAKING THE LAND USE TWO INTENTS FOR THE 0.2204 ACRE PROPERTY.
ADDITIONALLY, THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES ENCROACHING INTO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS ALONG THE BLOCK AND ADJACENT TO THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND AMEND THE REQUEST TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO APPROACH THE PODIUM.
HI, MY NAME IS BONITA CORDOVA.
I'M HERE FOR PROPERTY 38 0 3 SOUTHWEST MILITARY.
I'M HERE TO, UM, CHANGE THE ZONING TO THE COMMUNITY.
UM, JUST TO BE ABLE TO BE, TO ADD AN AMENDMENT, TO HAVE A SMALL EVENT ROOM IN CASE IF THAT'S SOMETHING A TENANT WOULD LIKE TO DO.
UM, I CAN'T TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO WITH THE PROPERTY YET 'CAUSE IT'S A PROCESS OF BEING BUILT, BUT SO YOUR REQUEST IS TO CHANGE IT FROM, UH, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL TO UHHUH JUST TO BE ABLE TO ADD THAT OPTION FOR A TENANT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A SMALL EVENT ROOM THERE.
UM, NOTHING BIG, JUST THE AROUND 40 TO 50 PEOPLE THAT, THAT'S POSSIBLE ONCE I GET THAT UP TO THAT STEP.
UM, MAYBE LIKE EXAMPLE A SMALL BABY SHOWER OR A SMALL KIDS' PARTY.
I MEAN THE, THE PROPERTY IS NOT THAT BIG TOO.
WE'LL, UH, MOVE ON TO COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
WE'LL START ON THE RIGHT WITH COMMISSIONER ZUKI.
UH, THANKS FOR COMING IN TODAY.
UH, QUESTION TO THE STAFF WITH THE, UH, NEW, UH, AMENDMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT WITH, UH, THE USE OF THE, UH, HOSPITAL FACILITY.
IS THAT WHAT YOU CALL A HOSPITAL FACILITY? OH NO.
WOULD THEY STILL BE ACCEPTABLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL? UM, HER REQUEST FIRST OFF, UH, STAFF STILL RECOMMENDS DENIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL JUST TO STAY ALIGNED WITH WHAT'S EXISTING ON THE BLOCK FACE.
BUT FOR HER, UM, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO KEEP THE C TWO BASED ZONING AND ADD THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE RECEPTION HALL AND PARTY.
[00:15:01]
MM-HMMSO IT'LL STILL BE C TWO JUST WITH THE AMENDMENT OF HAVING, SO YOU ARE NOT ASKING TO MAKE ANY CHANGES FOR NOW? NO, SHE IS ASKING FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE.
SO SHE NEEDS TO CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
UM, IT SOUNDED LIKE YOU SAID THAT THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION? NO, NOT YET.
I MEAN THOSE ARE THE PLANS, BUT RIGHT NOW WE JUST TOOK OUT THE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH THAT OLD, UH, HOME DUPLEX THAT THEY HAD.
UM, WE TOOK IT DOWN, WE'RE CLEANING THE PROPERTY NOW AND THOSE ARE THE PLANS FOR THE FUTURE.
SO ARE THOSE PLANS CURRENTLY BEING PERMITTED? UM, NOT YET.
SO I STILL HAVE TO GET SOMEONE TO TAKE OUT THE PERMITS AND MAKE THE PLANS AND ALL OF THAT.
SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST FOCUSING ON WHICH WE JUST DEMOLISHED THE PROPERTY, THE BUILDING, THE HOME, SMALL HOME THAT WAS THERE BEFORE AND CLEANING WHATEVER WAS LEFT.
UM, NEXT STEPS WOULD BE MAKING THOSE PLANS.
SO THEN I HAVE, UM, SOME FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS MM-HMM
UM, REGARDING, UM, WHAT LAND USE IS A BUDDING AND, AND ZONING IS A BUDDING THIS PROPERTY RIGHT NOW, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.
SO ARE THERE, UM, CURRENTLY ANY BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN ACTIVITY AT THIS PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY'S ADJACENT? THE BUFFER WOULD BE, UM, GIMME ONE SECOND.
I NEED TO CONFIRM WHAT THE NEIGHBORING, UH, ZONING IS.
SO IF IT'S A BUDDING C TWO, THEY WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED, UM, BUFFERS, BUT THERE WOULD BE REQUIRED BUFFERS ALONG SOUTHWEST MILITARY AND POTENTIALLY, UM, HOLDER AVENUE.
AND THEN THE, UH, NORTH PROPERTY LINE, UH, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S AN ALLEYWAY AND THEN IT ABUTS LOW LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH.
SO WOULD THERE BE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS TO THE NORTH AS WELL? I BELIEVE SO, BUT I CANNOT CONFIRM SINCE I DON'T REVIEW EXACT THE LANDSCAPING BUFFERS, BUT I BELIEVE THAT MOST LIKELY LIKE FENCING WOULD BE REQUESTED, UH, THAT KIND OF ITEM SINCE IT IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH.
ARE YOU AWARE OF THE BUFFERING AND THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL ALONG I, ALONG WITH THAT? YEAH.
WITH, I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT I THINK THERE'S LIKE A 15 FEET FROM THE FENCE.
THOSE PLANS THAT WE'VE HAD HAVE ARE AROUND THOSE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING.
AND, AND, UM, SO WHAT IS THE MAIN USE OF THIS FACILITY GOING TO BE? UM, I, LIKE I SAID, I CAN'T TELL YOU EXACTLY RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE WILL BE, UM, LEASING IT OR RENTING IT OUT TO TENANTS.
SO I JUST WANT TO HAVE MORE OPTIONS TO BE ABLE TO GIVE THEM, TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THEIR BUSINESS THERE.
AND THAT'S WHY I'M REQUESTING THE, THAT CHANGE.
SO YOU'RE PLANNING TO BUILD IT OUT AS LIKE AN OFFICE BUILDING OR LIKE A RETAIL MM-HMM
LIKE A SMALL, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY LIKE A RETAIL WHERE THEY'RE JUST LIKE THREE LITTLE OFFICES.
TWO, I MEAN TWO OR THREE OFFICES THERE AND THEN LEASE THOSE OUT, HAVE TENANTS THERE AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO GIVE THAT OPTION TO THEM.
HAVE YOU, WHAT ENGAGEMENT HAVE YOU HAD WITH THE COMMUNITY? MAY I SEE THAT CANTANA NEIGHBORHOOD DIDN'T GET A RESPONSE, HAVE YOU? YES, I, TO THE NEIGHBORS, I EMAILED THEM, SPOKE WITH THEM OVER THE PHONE, ALSO SPOKE WITH THE DISTRICT FOUR.
UM, THEY ALL, WE ALL AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE, UH, CALLED I GUESS AN AMENDMENT OR A, UH, CONDITIONAL USE AND THEY WERE OKAY WITH IT.
SO ARE YOU FROM THIS NE, I MEAN, ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THIS NEIGHBORHOOD? DO YOU LIVE IN THE AREA? YEAH, I HAVE MY, UH, BUSINESS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER UP.
AND THAT'S A C3 PROPERTY AND ALSO HAVE OTHER PROPERTIES AROUND THE AREA.
AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WE'RE LOOKING AT LAND USE.
I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
I MEAN COMMUNITY MIGHT, UM, AND THEN ZONING WILL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE CONDITIONAL USE.
AND THAT ALSO, I KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT BUFFERING AND SETBACKS.
SOME OF THOSE THINGS CAN ALSO BE WORKED INTO THE CONDITIONAL USE MM-HMM
UM, HOWEVER IT GOES FORWARD, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO MAKE SURE.
YEAH, I, I'VE BEEN SPEAKING WITH THEM, KEEPING THEM UP WITH THE CHANGES AND MY IDEAS AND THEY ALL AGREED.
THAT'S WHY I DECIDED TO MOVE ON FORWARD WITH THE ZONING CHANGE AND MAKING THAT AMENDMENT.
COMMISSIONER LOPEZ? NO QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER BUSANTE? NO QUESTIONS.
UM, MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED THANKS TO COMMISSIONER SIEGEL ASKING THE QUESTIONS I WAS GONNA ASK.
SO
[00:20:01]
A MOTION TO, UM, APPROVE THE AMENDMENT OR THE AMENDED REQUEST TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL SECOND.AND WE DON'T HAVE TO ADD THE CONDITIONAL USE ON THAT, RIGHT? THAT GOES, THAT GOES WITH THE ZONING? NO.
ALL YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT IS THE AMENDMENT FOR COMMUNITY, COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST? A COMMUNITY, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MILAM STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL.
[Approval of Minutes ]
LAST ONE IS THE MINUTES.IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION OR, UH, QUESTIONS ON THE MINUTES? OKAY.
UH, THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE OR WE NEED MOTION.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL.
ALRIGHT, BEFORE WE ADJOURN, I WOULD LIKE TO, UM, AS WE ALL KNOW, THIS IS COMMISSIONER FAULKNER'S LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WITH US.
UM, SO I'D LIKE TO THANK HER FOR HER SERVICE TO THE CITY AND FOR DOING A WONDERFUL JOB ON PLANNING COMMISSION, APPRECIATED YOUR INSIGHTS AND YOUR COMMENTS AND, UH, BEING ABLE TO GET TO KNOW YOU AND WORK WITH YOU.
SO THANK YOU FOR, FOR BEING HERE, AND THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO.