[00:00:05]
WE'RE GONNA CALL THE SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION MEETING TO ORDER.
UM, CAN YOU TAKE ROLL CALL PLEASE? MR. NINO? MR. GARCIA PRESENT? MR. JORDAN? PRESENT.
MR. BROCK? PRESENT CHAIR RAMIREZ.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE SIGNED IN TO SPEAK TODAY? NO.
[Briefing and Possible Action on the following items ]
AND GET OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA PLEASE? ITEM NUMBER ONE IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-E-P-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR W-R-P-D-L-L-C.THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 11 5 4 FM 1957, ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 53.
THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 24 ACRES AND IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF CITY OF SAN ANTONIO CITY LIMITS IN WESTERN BEAR COUNTY.
THE OWNER IS W-R-P-D-L-L-C AND THE CONSULTANT IS COLLIER'S ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR THE APPLICANT IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AS SUCH, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P TO MITIGATE IMPACTS TO THE S-C-P-H-C-P COVERED SPECIES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
THE DRAFT MITIGATION DETERMINATION DETAILING THE PROJECT IS ATTACHED IN A SUMMARY OF THE MITIGATION NEEDS IS INCLUDED BELOW.
THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDES ZERO ACREAGE OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER GCW HABITAT WITH THE PROJECT AREA AND ZERO ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE PROJECT AREA WILL REQUIRE A TOTAL OF ZERO JC GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CAPED BURIAL BCV HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY BCV CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED OVER CAR ZONE THREE, A TOTAL OF 24.46 ACRES, OCCURS WITHIN CARONE THREE, AND THE PROJECT AREA IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS, BUT IS WITHIN 750 FEET OF AN OCCUPIED FEATURE.
PARTICIPATION IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING CARONE THREE AND FOUR PARTICIPATION FEE OF $24,460 AND A PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $2,446.
THE APPLICANT HAS PAID THE $2,500 APPLICATION FEE AND THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF $26,906 PRIOR TO COMPLETING ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGIST IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
I'LL LOOK ONLINE FIRST FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
I HAVE NO QUESTIONS CHAIR, AND I'LL LOOK TO MY LEFT FOR ANY QUESTIONS IN THE BOARDROOM.
JUST TO HAVE A CLARIFICATION, UH, IN THE BACKGROUND IT INDICATES THAT THERE IS ZERO ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER HABITAT, BUT IN THE ISSUE SUMMARY IT SAYS THE PROPERTY SUBJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER HABITAT.
SO IT JUST SEEMS A LITTLE THAT'S UNDER STAFF RECOMMENDATION OR IN THE STAFF REPORT.
SO THAT INFORMATION WOULD'VE BEEN PROVIDED BY JENNY, OUR BIOLOGIST.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANNA SPEAK TO THAT UNLESS THERE WAS A TYPO INITIATIVE SAID NOT.
IT SHOULD BE A NOT, IT SHOULD BE A NOT.
YEAH, BECAUSE THERE'S THIS, IT'S THAT TRACK IS NOT EVEN LOCATED.
CAN YOU CLARIFY THAT? PROJECT SUB THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE APPLICATION IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN GOLDEN SHAPE WAR WHEELER AND IS ENTIRELY IN CARD ZONE THREE.
DOES THAT HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YEAH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-C-P-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR CPS ENERGY.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY TWO 11 AND GOOD ENOUGH LANE AND CONTINUES NORTHWEST BOUND FOR APPROXIMATELY 6,000 FEET.
THE THE OWNER IS CPS ENERGY AND THE CONSULTANT IS ADAMS ENVIRONMENTAL.
CPS ENERGY INTENDS TO USE THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR AUTHORIZATION OF INCIDENTAL TAKE
[00:05:01]
OF THE COM OF THE COVERED CARS IN VERTEBRAES UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN IT DETERMINES THE ESA SECTION 10 AUTHORIZATION FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE COVERED CARS IN VERTEBRAS COVERED BY THE S-C-P-H-C-P IS NEEDED FOR CPS ENERGY ACTIVITIES WHERE CPS ENERGY ACTIVITIES OCCUR WITHIN THE PERMIT AREA OF THE S-C-P-H-C-P AND WHERE THE S-C-P-H-C-P IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY CPS ENERGY IE PARTICIPATION AND ACHIEVABLE WITHIN THE DESIRED TIMELINE FOR THE CPS ENERGY ACTIVITIES.IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, CPS ENERGY WOULD RELY ON THE PARTICIPATION PROCESS, AN INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION OF THE S-E-P-H-C-P FOR ADDRESSING IMPACTS TO THOSE COVERED CARS INVERTEBRAE ADDRESS BY SUCH PARTICIPATION AND WOULD NOT DRAW UPON ITS OWN INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION FOR THOSE SAME COVERED CARS IN VERTEBRAS UNDER THE CPS ENERGY SYSTEM WIDE HCP AND ITP.
THIS PROJECT, THIS PROJECT ADDRESSED BY THE THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT SEEK TO PARTICIPATE IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR PURPOSES OF RECEIVING INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION.
CPS ENERGY WAS ENROLLED, HAS ENROLLED THE PROJECT IN CPS ENERGY SYSTEM-WIDE HABITAT CONSERVATION, WHICH PROVIDES INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PROJECT.
PURSUANT TO THE CERTAIN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND CPS ENERGY DATED MARCH 20TH, 2024 CPS ENERGY SEEKS TO PAY THE S-C-P-H-C-P $492 AND 53 CENTS.
FOR CP S'S IMPACT TWO 0.8955 UNITS OF CARS MITIGATION FOR IMPACTS WITHIN CAR ZONE ONE AND THREE B THAT WILL OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE PROJECT AND COVERED UNDER C-P-S-H-C-P INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION.
THE PAYMENT OF THE S-C-P-H-C-P IS A CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS THE FUTURE ESTABLISHMENT MANAGEMENT MONITORING AND FUNDING FOR S-C-P-H-C-P-K-F-A AND NO INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATIONS FROM THE S-E-P-H-C-P OR CARS ENROLLMENT ACRES ARE REQUIRED FROM THE S-E-P-H-C-P.
FOR THIS PROJECT, THE APPLICANT HAS PAID A $2,500 PROCESSING FEE IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL OWN ADDITIONAL $492 AND 53 CENTS TO COMPLETE.
THE ENROLLMENT STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGIST IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROJECT.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE ONLINE, UM, MEMBER? NO CHAIR.
AND I'LL LOOK TO MY LEFT HERE IN THE BOARDROOM.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? JU JUST KIND OF A CLARIFICATION 'CAUSE TH THIS WAS KINDA WILD.
SO FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, CPS HAS THEIR OWN PERMIT AND ALL THAT.
PART OF THEIR CONDITIONS OF THEIR PERMIT IS TO MAKE THIS, I GUESS, PAYMENT INTO THE INCIDENTAL THING TO KIND OF COVER THAT, BUT IT'S NOT PARTICIPATING DIRECTLY INTO THE S-E-P-H-C-P, CORRECT? CORRECT.
NO OTHER QUESTIONS? DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? MOVE TO APPROVE? I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY BOB BROCK.
I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND BY KEN GLARY.
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE.
ITEM NUMBER THREE IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE 20 23 20 24 S-A-P-H-C-P ANNUAL REPORT.
ANNUAL REPORTS WILL COVER THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER ONE THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30TH TO COINCIDE WITH THE BEX COUNTY AND CITY OF SAN ANTONIO FISCAL YEARS.
THE END REPORT SHALL INCLUDE A SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATION IN THE S-A-P-H-C-P, A SUMMARY OF THE LANDS AND HABITATS INCLUDED IN THE S-P-H-C-B PRESERVE SYSTEM, A COPY OF CONSERVATION LEDGER, DOCUMENTING PRESERVATION CREDITS, A SUMMARY OF THE FINANCIAL STATUS OF THE SAPA SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS BY BIOLOGICAL MONITORING ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED A SUMMARY OF THE STATUS OF COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS, RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION TO PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLANS, A SUMMARY OF ANY COMPLIANCE RELATED ISSUES OR ACTIONS INVOLVING ENROLLED PROPERTIES.
THIS ANNUAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE ON OR BEFORE JULY 1ST, 2025.
DURING THE 20 23 20 20 24 PERIOD, WE HAVE ENROLLED SEVEN PROPERTIES AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE 20 23 20 24 S-A-P-H-P ANNUAL REPORT.
AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ONLINE? NO.
AND I'LL LOOK TO MY LEFT HERE IN THE BOARDROOM.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM OUR, UH, MEMBERS HERE? I, I'VE GOT A FEW.
I GUESS I'LL START WITH FIVE AND SIX.
SO THESE ARE PARTICULAR SITES THAT WE NEED TO CONDUCT THESE STUDIES AND
[00:10:01]
ALL THAT.'CAUSE I KNOW THAT THERE'S OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED LIKE THE STEVENS RANCH CARS AND SAWS APPS AND, AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
SO WE'RE JUST NOTING THAT THESE WERE AREAS THAT WE DID NEED TO STUDY AND WE'RE JUST DOCUMENTING THAT WE HAVE AND WE DIDN'T HAVE TO DO FOR THE OTHERS.
UH, FOR NUMBER SEVEN, SO WE, THIS WAS INTERESTING.
SO I GUESS IN 2018, A STUDY WAS DONE THAT TALKED ABOUT, UH, I DON'T KNOW.
IT KIND OF INFERRED THAT, YOU KNOW, THE CONSERVATION THING IS WORKING GREAT.
IT'S, BUT WE'RE FINDING THAT THERE WEREN'T REALLY SPECIFIC SPECIES.
THEY, THEY MIGHT SOMEWHAT BE RELATED AND, AND ALL THAT.
AND THEN IN 2023, NOW IT'S TALKING ABOUT HOW THERE SEEMS TO BE AN IMPACT TO THE SPECIES FROM HUMAN DEVELOPMENT TO, IS THAT JENNY? DO YOU WANNA ELABORATE ON THAT ONE? OKAY.
JENNY BLAIR WITH BLAIR WILDLIFE CONSULTING, UM, UM, SUB HCP, UM, BIOLOGIST, SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS ON THAT, IN 2018, WE HAD TO DO THE SUB HCP IN ORDER TO BEGIN IN ALLOWING ENROLLMENT IN ANY CAR ZONE.
PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING A, OUR FIRST KFA, WHICH WAS NORTHERN PRESERVE, WE HAD TO COMPLETE CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES FOR EACH OF THE LISTED SPECIES COVERED IN OUR PLAN FOR THE KARS.
SO SINCE THERE WEREN'T ANY, UM, CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOME OF OUR KARS IN VERTEBRATE SPECIES THAT OCCURRED OUTSIDE OF GOVERNMENT CANYON, WE COULD, UH, HCP FUNDED RESEARCH PROJECTS TO MEET THOSE CONSERVATION OBLIGATIONS AND THEN ALLOW US TO BEGIN ENROLLMENT, UM, FOR, AND THE PROGRAM TO GET UP AND OFF THE GROUND.
SO THAT'S THE STUDIES THAT WERE FUNDED, THE RESULTS OF THE STUDIES.
AND THEN IT ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE, THE IMPLICATIONS 'CAUSE THERE WAS SOME CHANGES TO THE SPECIES RANGES BASED ON THAT SECOND STUDY THAT WAS COMPLETED.
DOES THAT HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS? YEAH.
NOW IT LOOKS LIKE HE HAS MORE.
UH, SO ATTACHMENT C, ONE THING I NOTICED WAS THE PLAN TODAY FROM FY 17 TO 24, THOSE TOTALS SEEMED TO MATCH THE, UH, TOTALS THROUGH FY 23 UP ABOVE.
SO I'M NOT SEEING THAT THE STUFF FOR 2324 WAS ADDED.
COULD YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION ONE MORE TIME? UH, WHAT MY OBSERVATION IS THAT THE TOTALS LISTED FOR THE PLAN TO DATE FOR FY 17 THROUGH 24 ADDS UP TO WHAT'S BEEN DONE THROUGH FY 2223.
SO IT LOOKS LIKE THE STUFF THAT WAS ADDED IN 2324 IS NOT IN THAT TOTAL.
WHICH LEDGER ARE YOU LOOKING AT? THE, I'M DOING THE, UH, H UH, C-P-H-C-P ENROLLED PROPERTY IMPACTS BY SPECIES AND TYPE IMMEDIATELY AFTER APPENDIX EC.
SORRY, WE'RE LOOKING AT, LET'S MAKE SURE HE HAS IT ON THE SCREEN.
IS IT FOR CRANE BACK CAVE? UH, IT STARTS WITH, UM, APPLICANT NAME AND THEN A FY 20 17 18 TOTAL ACRES COVERED FOR INCIDENT TAKE AND ALL THAT.
WHICH ATTACHMENT? ATTACHMENT SEAT.
I, I, I COULD HAVE MIXED THIS UP, BUT LET ME JUST, I THINK IT'S A SHOW THAT IT'S, YEAH.
ATTACHMENT, ATTACHMENT A TABLE.
[00:15:02]
ENROLLED PROPERTIES IMPACT BY SPECIES AND TYPE.AND THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND LET YOU EXPLAIN.
SO WHEN I ADD UP THE TOTALS UP ABOVE, THAT ENDS WITH FY 2223, THAT TOTAL'S IN THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE, UH, PLAN TO DATE FOR, AND IT SAYS FY 17 TO 24, BUT THERE WAS, YOU KNOW, SOME ADDITIONAL AREA THAT WAS ADDED IN 2324 THAT I'M NOT SEEING IN THAT TOTAL.
AND MAKE SURE THAT THE FORMULA IS CARRIED FORWARD.
O OTHERWISE, WHEN I, I TAKE A LOOK NOW.
I KNOW THIS IS ACCOUNTING AND I HAD A FRIEND THAT TOOK AN ACCOUNTING CLASS AND HE ASKED ME TO HELP HIM AND I REALIZED ACCOUNTING'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL WORLD.
UH, BUT ONE THING I DID NOTICE IS WHEN I ADD UP THE DEBITS AND CREDITS AND ALL THAT, THAT DOESN'T SEEM TO MATCH UP WITH THE, THE IMPACT WHEN, WHEN I LOOK AT JUST THE TOTAL, BECAUSE THEY DON'T BREAK IT OUT BY, UH, INDIRECT AND DIRECT THINGS AND ALL THAT.
BUT I, WHEN I ADD UP THE TOTALS, THEY DON'T QUITE MATCH UP LIKE AN FY 2017 OR, YOU KNOW, 1718 FOR LIKE, UH, THE GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER PRESERVATION CREDIT LEDGER.
WHEN I ADD UP THE, THE DEBIT, I GET A TOTAL OF 61 ACRES AND ON THE REPORT IT HAS LIKE 67.58 AND I THINK THAT IS ATTACHMENT C.
IS THAT CORRECT? I, I HOPE SO.
SO OUR REPORT THAT TABLE, THE ENROLLED PROPERTY IMPACTS BY SPECIES AND TYPE ARE IMPACT ACRES, WHEREAS OUR LEDGERS ARE THE CREDITS REQUIRED, UH, THE CREDITS THAT WERE PURCHASED TO COVER THOSE SPECIFIC IMPACTS.
OUR, UM, UH, UH, AN APPENDIX C, THE GCW LEDGER ONLY IDENTIFIES THE, UH, TOTAL NUMBER OF CREDITS PURCHASE.
IT DOES NOT BREAK IT DOWN INTO, UM, WHAT THE INCIDENTAL, THE AMOUNT OF INCIDENTAL TAKE BETWEEN DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACT ACRES WERE COVERED FOR THE PROJECT.
SO THERE, THERE WILL BE VARIATION BETWEEN THOSE TWO, UM, NUMBERS IF YOU'RE TRYING TO, TO TRY TO MATCH, UM, THAT, UH, THE ENROLLED PROPERTIES VERSUS THE THE GCW CREDITS THAT WERE PURCHASED.
YEAH, BECAUSE, 'CAUSE LIKE I SAID, WHEN I JUST LOOK AT, WHEN YOU ADD THE INDIRECT AND DIRECT, THAT COMES UP WITH A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT NUMBER THAN CORRECT.
AND THAT'S BASED ON, THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN OUR MITIGATION RATIOS TOO.
SO OUR DIRECT IMPACTS ARE TWO TO ONE AND OUR INDIRECT IMPACTS ARE HALF TO ONE.
CAN CAN YOU CLARIFY WHAT DIRECT IMPACTS ARE AND WHAT INDIRECT IMPACTS ARE? JUST KIND OF A SUMMARY.
DIRECT IMPACTS ARE PRO ARE IMPACTS THAT OCCUR WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY TO BE ENROLLED OR THAT HAS ENROLLED WITHIN THE PLAN.
THE INDIRECT IMPACTS ARE, UM, EFFECTS THAT OCCUR UP TO 300 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE, UM, BOUNDARY OF THE AREA THAT HAS ENROLLED IN THE PROJECT OR ENROLLED IN THE PLAN.
SO WOULD SOME OF THAT DIFFERENCE THEN BE THAT EXTRA 300 FEET OUTSIDE AND THAT, THAT'S WHY THE NUMBERS ARE SLIGHTLY HIGHER? CORRECT.
UH, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, I KIND OF SAW KIND OF THE SAME THING WITH THE, WITH THE, UH, CARS THING.
AGAIN, JUST SLIGHT VARIATIONS AND I, I GUESS AGAIN, IT'S BECAUSE OF BUFFER ZONES AND STUFF LIKE THAT.
SO FOR CAR, WE ONLY HAVE DEBITS TO THE LEDGERS AND OUR AMOUNT THAT WE CAN, OUR AMOUNT OF ENROLLMENT ACRES ARE ONLY DEBITED FOR CAR STONE ONE AND TWO IMPACTS.
WE TRACK CAR STONE THREE AND FOUR IMPACTS, BUT WE DO NOT DEBIT THOSE IMPACTS FROM THE LEDGER.
SO THERE'S, THERE'S ENTRIES FOR THOSE IN EACH OF THE VARIOUS, UH, LEDGERS FOR THE CARS PRESERVES IN APPENDIX C, BUT THERE ARE NET, THERE IS ZERO, UM, ENTRY IN TERMS OF THE, UH, HOW IT AFFECTS THE REMAINING AMOUNT OF ENROLLMENT ACRES, UM, THAT ANY, UM, INDIVIDUAL PRESERVE HAS AVAILABLE.
DOES THAT HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS, BOB? YEAH, I MEAN, IF ANYTHING IT HELPS CLARIFY, YOU KNOW, WHY, WHY NUMBERS SOMETIMES DON'T MATCH.
[00:20:01]
SOUM, BASED OFF OF ALL OF THOSE QUESTIONS, UM, ARE THERE ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES, JENNY, THAT WE NEED TO DO TO THE ANNUAL REPORT OR IT, THE WAY IT IS SUBMITTED IS, IS, UM, I WILL ACCURATE.
I WANT TO GO BACK AND RECHECK.
UM, FOR THE ENROLLED PROPERTY IMPACTS BY SPECIES AND TYPE, UM, I WILL GO BACK AND ENSURE THAT THAT TOTAL DID CARRY FORWARD AND IF IT DIDN'T, THEN THAT WOULD NEED TO JUST BE, UH, THE FORMULA JUST NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO, UM, PULL THAT IN, ADJUSTED AND ADJUSTED.
SO TO CORRECTLY REFLECT WHAT HAS BEEN CORRECT.
SO, UM, RILEY, CAN YOU GO TO THIS MAP OR THIS CHART? I'M SORRY.
I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE A QUICK CLARIFICATION ON THIS DOCUMENT.
THE S-E-P-A-C-P BUDGET UNDER FOR THE ENDOWMENT FOR THE PANTHER SPRINGS, THERE IS A DISCREPANCY ON THERE, BUT OUR FISCAL TEAM IS LOOKING INTO THESE NUMBERS AND WILL BE UPDATED IT ACCORDINGLY.
THE UPDATED COPY WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT TO US FISH AND WILDLIFE ONCE THAT GETS UPDATED.
AND THAT'S THE BLUE HIGHLIGHTED ONE ON THE SCREEN? NO, IT'S UNDER THE ENDOWMENT FUND.
PANTHER SPRINGS PRESERVE DOWN AT THE BOTTOM.
SO IS THAT PANTHER SPRINGS OR CRANE? BAT CAVE? IT WAS PANTHER SPRINGS OR PANTHER SPRINGS AT THE BOTTOM.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'LL LOOK ONLINE ONE MORE ROUND.
AND THEN ANY OTHER QUESTIONS HERE FOR THE MOTION? WHAT ARE WE RECOMMENDING TO APPROVE WITH AMENDMENTS AS DISCUSSED? YES.
SO I'LL TAKE A MOTION FOR AMENDMENTS AS DISCUSSED.
UM, AND DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR AN APPROVAL? OKAY, I'LL, I'LL GO TAKE A STAB AT IT SO I, I'LL APPROVE WITH THE AMENDMENTS AS DISCUSSED.
'CAUSE IT'S A LOT EASIER THAN SAYING ALL THE ONES THAT WERE DISCUSSED.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? YEAH, I'LL SECOND.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE AMENDMENTS AS DISCUSSED BY BOB BROCK AND A SECOND BY KEN GLARY.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
[Approval of Minutes ]
WE HAVE ANOTHER ITEM ON THE AGENDA.IT'S JUST APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 11TH, 2025 MINUTES.
ARE THERE ANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO THOSE MINUTES OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OR, I'M SORRY, A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOVE TO APPROVE.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY BOB BROCK.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
SORRY, I'M CHANGING YOUR NAME.
AND THAT COMPLETES OUR AGENDA.
YES, IT IS 3 54 AND OUR MEETING IS ADJOURNED.