* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:03] GOOD AFTERNOON LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, IF WE COULD PLEASE HAVE OUR SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION SERVICES, THE OVERSIGHT, THE STORAGE OF OVERSIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. GRACIA. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. MY NAME IS JOHN BUSANTE AND I'M THE CHAIR OF THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, AS WELL AS THE DISTRICT FIVE ZONING COMMISSIONER. UH, THE TIME IS ONE OH ONE AND I HEREBY CALL THIS REGULARLY NOTICED MEETING OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, SAN ANTONIO ZONING COMMISSION INTO SESSION. ALRIGHT, UH, I LIKE TO DO ROLL CALL BY ALLOWING THE ZONING COMMISSIONERS TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES, STARTING WITH THE COMMISSIONER ON MY FAR LEFT. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. UH, MARCO BARROS. UH, DISTRICT NINE. ROB SES, DISTRICT SEVEN. ROWLAND GONZALEZ, DISTRICT EIGHT. DANIEL KELLUM, DISTRICT ONE, JOHN WITT, DISTRICT 10. TAYLOR WATSON, DISTRICT TWO. GEORG OSA, DISTRICT THREE. EDDIE REYES, DISTRICT FOUR. OH, COMMISSIONER CHASE, WE DIDN'T QUITE HEAR YOU WELL. ALRIGHT, THAT IS COMMISSIONER JANELLE CHASE, UH, THE MAYOR'S APPOINTEE. WE WILL WORK ON THE AUDIO QUESTIONS AS WE GO FORWARD. COMMISSIONER CHASE, MAYBE . ALRIGHT. STAFF IS A QUORUM PRESENT? YES. A QUORUM IS PRESENT. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. WOULD EVERYONE PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS NATION ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE. AND JUSTICE. ALRIGHT, PRIOR TO BEGINNING OUR HEARING, I WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REVIEW OUR MEETING FORMAT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE. STAFF. IF YOU WOULD, BEFORE I BEGIN, PLEASE TURN YOUR PHONES ON VIBRATE OR TURN THEM OFF. THE ZONING COMMISSION IS AN 11 MEMBER BODY APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ZONING CASES. UPON RECEIVING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COMMISSION, YOU, YOU'LL HAVE SIX MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO FORWARD YOUR CASE TO CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CASE MANAGER. STAFF WILL BEGIN EACH CASE WITH A SHORT PRESENTATION OF THE REQUEST. PART OF THE PRESENTATION INCLUDES A MAP THAT SHOWS THE AREA TO BE CONSIDERED FOR REZONING AND PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OF THAT SUBJECT, PROPERTY CHECK MARKS INDICATE THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST AND AN X INDICATES THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS IN OPPOSITION. FOLLOWING THIS PRESENTATION AND ANY QUESTIONS BY THE COMMISSION, THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT THEIR REQUEST. FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, UM, FOR OR AGAINST THE PROPOSED REZONING, YOU WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER THAT YOU SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. THOSE IN SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION WILL BE ALLOWED A MAXIMUM OF THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER AND YOU ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO UTILIZE THE MAXIMUM TIME LIMITATION. YOU WILL BE INFORMED THAT THOSE THREE MINUTES ARE UP. FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THEIR TIME TO ANOTHER SPEAKER, THAT SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOWED A MAXIMUM OF TWO PEOPLE GIVING THEIR TIME FOR A TOTAL OF NINE MINUTES. THOSE GIVING UP THEIR TIME MUST BE PRESENT AND SIGNED IN TO SPEAK AND MUST ANNOUNCE WHEN THAT SPEAKER THAT THEY'RE GIVING THEIR TIME TO IS GOING UP TO THE PODIUM. THE APPLICANT WILL THEN BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL LIMITED TO ONE SPEAKER WITH A THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT ALONG WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CHAIR. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. [Zoning Items  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pproval of Minutes  ] ON OUR AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES. ANY CHANGES, AMENDMENTS, COMPLAINTS? KEEP THEM TO YOURSELF. UH, HEARING NONE. IS THERE A MOTION? GO AHEAD. I'LL GIVE YOU A MOTION. . APPROVAL. APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER WITS IT MOVES FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. UH, COMMISSIONER REYES IS THE SECOND. THIS WILL BE BY ACCLIMATION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MINUTES AS SUBMITTED. SAY AYE. AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. ALRIGHT, MOTION CARRIES. IS THERE A DIRECTOR'S REPORT? NO DIRECTOR'S REPORT. ALRIGHT. THERE IS NO DIRECTOR'S REPORT. THE TIME IS 2 27. THIS MEETING OF THE ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO IS ADJOURNED. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.