[00:00:08] >> KAUR: TIME IS NOW 2:07 P.M. AND WE'LL CALL ZONING SESSION TO ORDER. MADAME CLERK, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? >> CLERK: COUNCILMEMBER WHYTE IS HERE VIRTUALLY. QUORUM. >> KAUR: WE HAVE A FEW ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 15. THOSE ARE 15, 16, AND 19. CAN A GET A MOTION TO CONTINUE? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? WE HAVE ONE GENTLEMAN SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. THIS ITEM IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED, MR. VINCENT. WOULD YOU STILL LIKE TO TAKE YOUR TIME? COME ON UP. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. YOU'LL BE SPEAKING ON ITEM NO. 19. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT HERE. THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER. AS A CONTINUANCE, WE WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO TRY TO GET ON THE DECEMBER 18TH MEETING, IF YOU WANT TO DO THAT AS WELL. I UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS FOR US TO ANSWER. WE STILL HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S SUPPORT. WE STILL HAVE ALL THE SUPPORT, AT LEAST NO OPPOSITION. AND WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE TENANT THAT WE'RE HELPING GET A NEW RENTAL. IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE, TRY TO GET US ON THE 18TH. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: THANK YOU. WE'LL NOW GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT ZONING ITEMS. ON CONSENT WE HAVE ITEMS -- OH. JUST KIDDING. LET'S TAKE A VOTE ON CONTINUANCE, PLEASE. >> WHYTE: YES. >> KAUR: MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO CONSENT ZONING ITEMS. THESE ARE 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26. DO ANY OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY ITEMS TO PULL? CAN I GET A MOTION? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. AND WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. MR. JOAQUIN ROMO. ALL RIGHT. >> SPANISH] >> SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. >> WHYTE: YES. >> KAUR: MOTION CARRIES. LET'S MOVE ON TO INDIVIDUAL ITEMS. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL IS ITEM 2, AND THIS IS IN COUNCIL DISTRICT 7. CAN WE HAVE A PRESENTATION AND THEN WE'LL MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBER ALDERETE GAVITO. >> AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 THE SCHOOL BEING THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN ANTONIO, WHO WROTE BACK OPPOSED. THIS, AGAIN, IS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN ANTONIO. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: COUNCILWOMAN. >> GAVITO: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM. THANK YOU TO THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN ANTONIO AND THE RESTAURANT FOR LOOKING TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT ON OPERATING HOURS, ALCOHOL SALES, AND PROMOTING COMMUNITY SAFETY IN THE AREA. UNFORTUNATELY, NO AGREEMENT WAS ABLE TO BE MADE AND I DON'T FEEL CONFIDENT WITH APPROVING OR CONTINUING THIS CASE WITHOUT AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOTH PARTIES. THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN ANTONIO SUBMITTED A LETTER OF OPPOSITION STATING THEIR CONCERNS FOR STUDENTS' SAFETY AND COMMUNITY CHALLENGES OF LOITERING IN THE AREA. I MOTION FOR DENIAL. >> KAUR: OKAY. SO WE DO NOT HAVE ANYONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK FOR ITEM NO. 2? IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION? OKAY. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. >> >> WHYTE: AYE. >> KAUR: COUNCILMEMBER MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ IS ALSO [00:05:04] ONLINE . OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. THE NEXT ITEM FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ARE ITEMS 6 AND 7. >> AGENDA ITEMS NO. 6 AND 7 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: HOURS OF OPERATION ARE TO BE MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M. STAFF MAILED 24 NOTICES. WE RECEIVED ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED. AND THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE MONTE VISTA TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: THIS ITEM IS IN DISTRICT 1. WE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION FROM ANY RESIDENTS AND SO WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND FOLLOW ZONING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THIS. MOTION TO APPROVE? >> SECOND. >> KAUR: YES. WE DO HAVE SOMEONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. RONALD MITTER. >> OTHER COUNCIL DISCUSSION? OKAY. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. >> WHYTE: YES. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: AYE. >> KAUR: ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS 8 AND 9, ALSO IN D1. >> AGENDA ITEMS 8 AND 9. PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. STAFF MAILED 29 NOTICES, ZERO WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED. THE ALTA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR OF THE REQUESTED C-1. >> KAUR: THANK YOU SO MUCH IF Y'ALL HAVEN'T CHECKED THIS SPACE OUT, IT'S ON WOODLAWN AND FLORES. YOU'VE GOT TO GO. IT'S REALLY COOL. YOU CAN GO IN AND ENJOY. MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> KAUR: THERE'S NO FOLKS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. UNLESS THERE'S ANY OTHER COUNCIL DISCUSSION? LET'S GO AND VOTE. >> WHYTE: YES. >> KAUR: ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. ITEMS 23 AND 34. >> AGENDA ITEMS 23 AND 24. AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. 18 NOTICES MAILED, ONE OF THOSE RETURNED IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED. THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS OPPOSED AND STAFF RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM THE SUNSHINE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION . OUTSIDE OF THE 200-FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY, 72 WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR AND 2 IN OPPOSITION. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: THANK YOU. THIS ITEM IS IN DISTRICT 7. SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GIVE IT TO COUNCILWOMAN. >> GAVITO: THANK YOU TO CITY STAFF AND THE PLANNING TEAM WHO PUT THIS TOGETHER AND HELPED MY STAFF WITH ANSWERING ALL THE QUESTIONS. I WANT TO THANK THE APPLICANT FOR DOING THEIR DUE DILIGENCE AND REACHING OUT TO NEIGHBORS. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANK THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FOR WORKING WITH MY OFFICE TO ELEVATE SOME OF THEIR CONCERNS REGARDING THE ZONING CASE. MY TEAM RECEIVED MULTIPLE CALLS AND RESIDENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST AND MY OFFICE HAS ALSO RECEIVED LETTERS OF OPPOSITION FROM THE JEFFERSON AND MONTICELLO PARK NEIGHBORHOODS. I NEED TO STAND WITH THEM IN OPPOSITION FOR THIS CASE. I MOTION FOR DENIAL. >> KAUR: OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. THERE ARE A FEW FOLKS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. BIANCA. ARE Y'ALL SPEAKING TOGETHER AS A GROUP? >> THEY'RE GOING TO ALLOT THEIR TIME TO ME. >> KAUR: ARE YOU ANDREW AND ANDY GARCIA? YOU'LL HAVE NINE MINUTES TOGETHER. >> I ALSO HAVE THESE FLIERS. I DON'T KNOW ALLOW TO GET THEM TO YOU GUYS. >> KAUR: YOU CAN PASS THEM UP HERE . >> GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS BIANCA BARON. MY FAMILY AND I ARE HERE FOR THE REQUEST TO REZONE SUNSHINE FOR A PROJECT WE TRULY BELIEVE WILL BENEFIT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND SUPPORT OUR SON'S DREAM OF BECOMING [00:10:02] A BUSINESS OWNER IN THE COMMUNITY HE GREW UP IN . I WANT TO BEGIN BY BEING TRANSPARENT WE WERE EVEN ADVISED BY DISTRICT 7 TO RETRACT OUR REQUEST ENTIRELY. I RESPECTFULLY CHOSE NOT TO DO THAT I BELIEVE FIRMLY THAT OUR FAMILY AND ALL HARD-WORKING AVERAGE SAN ANTONIO FAMILIES PURSUING LEGITIMATE DREAMS DESERVE TO HAVE OUR VOICES HEARD, OUR EFFORTS RECOGNIZED, AND OUR EXPERIENCES DOCUMENTED. I'M HERE SPEAKING FOR MY SON, FOR MY FAMILY, AND OTHERS IN THE CITY WHO ARE TRYING TO BUILD SOMETHING POSITIVE FOR THE FUTURE. FROM THE BEGINNING, WE APPROACHED THIS PROCESS WITH OPENNESS, RESPECT, AND FULL COMPLIANCE. YET OUR EXPERIENCE HAS NOT REFLECTED THAT FAIRNESS, TRANSPARENCY, OR CONSISTENCY THAT RESIDENTS SHOULD REASONABLY EXPECT. WE FOLLOWED EVERY INSTRUCTION, MAINTAINED COMMUNICATION WITH EVERY PARTY, AND ACTED IN GOOD FAITH. YET CRITICAL INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD UNTIL THE VERY LAST MOMENT WHICH PREVENTED US FROM RESPONDING MEANINGFULLY. WE ATTENDING BOTH THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE SUNSHINE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION MEETINGS. AT BOTH MEETINGS WE RECEIVED POSITIVE FEEDBACK, HEARD IN OPPOSITION, AND WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT LETTERS OF SUPPORT. WE SHARED INFORMATIONAL FLIERS AND CONTINUED COMMUNICATION BUT OUR REQUESTS WENT UNANSWERED . AT THE JEFFERSON MEETING A RESIDENT OPENLY STATED THE PROPERTY WAS NOT TRULY WITHIN THEIR ASSOCIATION AND WOULD NOT IMPACT THEM. I EXPLAINED THAT OUR HOME SITS DIRECTLY ON THE BORDER OF BOTH ASSOCIATIONS AND WE WERE THERE IN GOOD FAITH TO BE TRANSPARENT. BECAUSE OF THIS BORDER LOCATION, BOTH NEIGHBORHOODS SHOULD BE TREATED EQUALLY IN THIS PROCESS. WE ALSO CONDUCTED EXTENSIVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH. WE WENT DOOR TO DOOR, SPOKE TO NEIGHBORS FACE-TO-FACE AND DISTRIBUTED FLIERS, OF WHICH I HAVE JUST PROVIDED YOU GUYS WITH, WITH FACTS, PHOTOS, AND A QR CODE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR PETITION. AS A RESULT, WE COLLECTED OVER 70 SIGNATURES, SIGNATURES FROM DISTRICT 7 RESIDENTS, INCLUDING SEVERAL WITHIN THE 200-FOOT RADIUS. THEIR VOICES MATTER TOO. THEIR SUPPORT DESERVES EQUAL RESPECT AS JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION'S POSITION. DESPITE THIS WE RECEIVED NOTICE ONLY TWO DAYS AGO THAT THE JENNIFER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HAD SUBMITTED OPPOSITION WITHOUT ANY EXPLANATION PROVIDED AND ONLY ONE DAY AGO DISTRICT 7 INFORMED US THAT THEY WOULD NOT SUPPORT OUR REQUEST. AT NO POINT PRIOR, NOT IN ANY MEETING, CALL, OR E-MAIL DID ARE DISTRICT 7 EVER INDICATE THAT THEY WERE NOT IN SUPPORT, EVEN AFTER THE ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED OUR REQUEST WITH ONLY TWO OPPOSITIONS. IN ADDITION, MULTIPLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATES WERE RESCHEDULED BY DISTRICT 7, NONE FOR REASONS RELATED TO ACTUAL OPPOSITION. THIS CREATED DELAYS AND UNCERTAINTY AND YET WE WERE NEVER INFORMED THAT CONCERNS EXISTED OR THAT THE DISTRICT'S POSITION WAS OFFICIAL OR HAD CHANGED. DURING ALL THIS, WE CONTINUED INVESTING IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE CLEANED AND SECURED A HOME THAT HAD BEEN ABANDONED, UNSAFE, AND FILLED WITH DRUG PARAPHERNALIA. WE DID FREE HAIRCUTS AND BACK TO SCHOOL GIVEAWAYS. EVERYTHING WE HAVE DONE HAS BEEN WITH THE INTENTIONS OF IMPROVING THE AREA AND CONTRIBUTING POSITIVELY TO OUR COMMUNITY. THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, WE HAVE MAINTAINED TRANSPARENCY, RESPONDED QUICKLY, ACTED RESPECTFULLY, AND RESPONSIBLY. UNFORTUNATELY, WE DID NOT RECEIVE THE SAME TRANSPARENCY IN RETURN. DESPITE ASKING MULTIPLE TIMES FOR THE REASONS BEHIND THE OPPOSITION FROM JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, OUR DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE NEVER PROVIDED AN EXPLANATION. THE ONLY INFORMATION WE SAW CAME ACROSS TODAY FROM OUR CASEWORKER WHO SHARED US THE E-MAILS THAT STATED THEIR CONCERN WAS SIMPLY FEAR OF FUTURE REZONING REQUEST IN THAT SAME AREA, NOT OUR ACTUAL PROJECT. THIS EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN DISCOURAGING AND I WANT TO EXPRESS RESPECTFULLY, AS A HISPANIC BORN AND RAISED SAN ANTONIO FAMILY, WE FOLLOWED EVERY RULE, IMPROVED A BLIGHTED PROPERTY, AND ENGAGED IN OUR COMMUNITY OPENLY. THE LAST-MINUTE DECISION AND LACK OF COMMUNICATION LEAVES US FEELING OVERLOOKED AND UNSURE WHY OUR EFFORTS WERE NOT GIVEN EQUAL CONSIDERATION. OUR PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY A COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT AND A CITY UTILITY SITE. NOT BY PHYSICAL HOMES. THE CLOSEST RESIDENTS, THE ONES MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED, WE HAVE SIGNED IN OUR PETITION. THEIR VOICES SHOULD NOT BE DISCOUNTED. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR SPECIAL TREATMENT. WE ARE ASKING FOR FAIR TREATMENT, TRANSPARENCY, AND EQUAL REGARD FOR THE DISTRICT 7 RESIDENTS WHO SUPPORTED US. TODAY, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE SO THAT WE MAY FAIRLY ADDRESS CONCERNS AND REENGAGE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND TO CONSIDER OF AN R-5 CONDITIONAL USE OR ANY REASONABLE CONDITIONS THIS COUNCIL BELIEVES IS APPROPRIATE. WE ARE COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH THE CITY, DISTRICT 7, AND OUR NEIGHBORS. WE BELIEVE THAT THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE A POSITIVE ADDITION TO OUR COMMUNITY, NOT ONLY FOR OUR FAMILY, BUT FOR THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO READ A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM VICE [00:15:02] PRINCIPAL FROM THE MIDDLE SCHOOL DOWN THE STREET. IT SAYS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. MY NAME IS NORMA GONZALES AND I SERVE AS AN ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL AT LONG FELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL. EVERY DAY I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF WORKING CLOSELY WITH OUR STUDENTS AND SEEING BOTH THE OBSTACLES THEY FACE AND THE RESILIENCY THEY SHOW. MANY FEEL STUCK IN THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES , UNSURE OF WHAT THEIR FUTURES MIGHT HOLD. THIS IS WHY IT IS SO POWERFUL FOR THEM TO MEET ROLE MODELS IN OUR COMMUNITY THAT REMIND THEM THAT SUCCESS IS POSSIBLE. ANDREW GARCIA, WHO IS MY SON, IS ONE SUCH ROLE MODEL. AS A YOUNG BARBER BUILDING HIS OWN BUSINESS, HE HAS BECOME AN INSPIRING EXAMPLE FOR OUR STUDENTS. THEY RELATE TO HIM AND SEE SOMEONE WHO IS CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR HIMSELF AND GIVING BACK TO OTHERS. HIS JOURNEY GIVES THEM HOPE AND SHOWS THEM THAT THEIR GOALS ARE WITHIN REACH. I HAVE OBSERVED FIRSTHAND THE POSITIVE IMPACT ANDREW HAS HAD ON OUR STUDENTS. MANY ALREADY GO TO HIM FOR HAIRCUTS AND THEY OFTEN TALK ABOUT HOW THEY TOO CAN BECOME BARBERS OR ENTREPRENEURS BECAUSE THEY SEE ANDREW DOING IT. HE HAS GIVEN BACK GENEROUSLY, OFFERING FREE BACK TO SCHOOL HAIRCUTS AND PROVIDING BACKPACKS TO CHILDREN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. HAVING A BUSINESS LIKE HIS IN OUR COMMUNITY LED BY A FAMILY WHO GREW UP IN SAISD, IS TRULY A BLESSING. I AM CONFIDENT THAT HIS PRESENCE WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE A MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE FOR OUR STUDENTS AND THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. AND THIS IS FROM NORMA GONZALES, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL OF LONGFELLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR CONSIDERATION. >> KAUR: OKAY. THERE'S NO ONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO TO COUNCIL DISCUSSION. GO AHEAD. >> VIAGRAN: STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OR DID STAFF RECOMMEND DENIAL? >> STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. >> VIAGRAN: AND ZONING? >> SPECIFICALLY, STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. >> VIAGRAN: OKAY. HOW MANY MEMBERS ARE PART OF JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION? >> I DON'T KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. >> VIAGRAN: OKAY. AND THIS SITS IN THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OR THE SUNSHINE? >> IT'S WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BOTH, AS I UNDERSTAND IT. SO BOTH WERE NOTIFIED AND SPECIFICALLY JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WROTE BACK OPPOSED AND THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE SUNSHINE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. >> VIAGRAN: WHAT WAS THEIR REASON FOR THE OPPOSITION OF THIS? >> THE LETTER JUST MENTIONED THEY WERE OPPOSED. >> VIAGRAN: THAT'S ALL THEY MENTIONED? I DON'T KNOW IF COUNCILWOMAN'S OFFICE KNOWS HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE PART OF THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, BUT THANK YOU FOR SHARING AND SPEAKING. THE ONE THING ABOUT THESE ZONING CASES -- AND THIS HAPPENS IN DISTRICT 3, IN PARTICULAR, IS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE OF INDICATING WHY AND I DO NEED TO FULLY UNDERSTAND HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE A PART OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. IF STAFF AND THE COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES ARE GOING TO SAY THAT THEY APPROVE IT, I WANT TO KNOW WHY WE'RE DENYING THIS. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: YOU WANT TO SPEAK? GO AHEAD. >> GAVITO: WE CAN MOVE TO CONTINUE THIS. >> KAUR: DO WE HAVE TO HAVE A SEPARATE PERSON MOTION TO CONTINUE? WE DON'T? >> VIAGRAN: I MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE TO -- >> KAUR: JANUARY 15TH? >> VIAGRAN: JANUARY 15, 2025. I'M SORRY. 2026. >> KAUR: CAN I GET A SECOND? OH, YOU CAN SECOND IT? >> SECOND. >> KAUR: ALL RIGHT. NOW WE'LL MOVE TO ADDITIONAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION. >> GAVITO: THE ONLY THING I WAS GOING TO NOTE -- I DON'T KNOW AND MAYBE MY TEAM CAN PULL UP THE JEFFERSON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. WE GOT IT FROM JEFFERSON AND MONTICELLO. THEY'RE BOTH FAIRLY SIZABLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. SO, JUST FYI. SUNSHINE ESTATES -- BECAUSE THIS AREA IS SMACK DAB IN THE MIDDLE OF BOTH. SUNSHINE ESTATES DOESN'T WRITE LETTERS OF APPROVAL OR DENIAL. >> KAUR: THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL COUNCIL MEMBER DISCUSSION? OKAY. SO DO WE JUST VOTE ON THE CONTINUANCE THEN? OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND VOTE RIGHT NOW ON THE CONTINUANCE TO JANUARY. >> WHYTE: YES. >> KAUR: MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU TO THE FAMILY FOR JOINING US TODAY. ALL RIGHT. LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NO. 25, WHICH IS AN ETJ. WE'LL TAKE THE PRESENTATION [00:20:03] FIRST. >> AGENDA ITEM 25. IT AMENDS THE CAMP BULLIS ETJ LAND USE PLAN FROM RESIDENTIAL ESTATE TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL. LOCATED AT 8860 CROSS MOUNTAIN TRAIL. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. STAFF MAILED 15 NOTICES, SIX WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR, THREE IN OPPOSITION. THERE IS NO REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WITHIN 200 FEET. OUTSIDE OF 200 FEET, ONE WAS RETURNED IN FAVOR AND 74 IN OPPOSITION. THANK YOU. >> KAUR: THANK YOU. COUNCILWOMAN MEZA GONZALEZ. >> GONZALEZ: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM. I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> KAUR: EMILY, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP AND TAKE YOUR TIME? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION? LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. COUNCILMEMBER WHYTE, ARE YOU STILL WITH US? >> WHYTE: YES. I'M A YES. YES. >> KAUR: GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. TIME IS NOW 2:28 P.M. AND WE ARE ADJOURNING ZONING. THANK YOU, ALL. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.