[00:00:05]
SO WE'RE GONNA CALL THE S-C-P-H-C-P COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETING TO ORDER.
CAN WE START WITH ROLL CALL? MR. BROCK? PRESENT.
DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT TODAY? SO WE DID RES HOLD ON.
SO WE DID RECEIVE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT THROUGH EMAIL AND THAT WAS FORWARDED TO THE SEP COORDINATING COMMITMENT MEMBERS THIS MORNING AND WE HAVE ONE VOICEMAIL.
AND NOBODY HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
CAN WE GO AHEAD AND PLAY THE VOICEMAIL? I LIVE AT 9 5 2 5 ROCHELLE AND I AM CALLING REGARDING AGENDA ITEM TWO.
UM, ON THE UM, H UH, S-E-P-H-C-P AGENDA, UH, CASE ENDING 0 0 1 5.
I WAS THE PLANNING CHAIR FOR THE EBNER LEON CREEK COMMUNITY PLAN AND A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN.
THIS COMMUNITY'S WEBPAGE DEFINES ONE OF ITS PURPOSES IS TO INVOLVE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS IN CONSERVATION PLANNING.
GOOGLE DEFINITION OF LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS IN CONSERVATION PLANNING IS ANYONE IN THE COMMUNITY WHO LIVE NEAR USE BENEFIT FROM, OR ARE AFFECTED BY LOCAL NATURAL RESOURCES OR CONSERVA OR CONSERVATION PROJECTS, BE IT INDIVIDUALS, RESIDENTS, GROUPS, BUSINESSES, OR AGENCIES.
SINCE YOUR TASK IS TO INVOLVE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS IN CONSERVATION PLANNING AND YOU DID NOT INCLUDE ANY ABUTTING RESIDENTS NOR THE CITY OF GRAY FOREST, I'M GOING TO FORMALLY REQUEST THAT YOU POSTPONE YOUR DECISION UNTIL YOU HAVE ENGAGED THESE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS IN CONSERVATION PLANNING AS DEFINED IN YOUR CHARTER AND AS DEFINED IN THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN.
ALSO, UM, OTHER BIOLOGISTS HAVE REPORTED ADDITIONAL ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT ARE MISSING FROM THE PROVIDED CASE MITIGATION REPORT.
THESE ADDITIONAL ENDANGERED SPECIES WOULD'VE BEEN DISCUSSED IF YOU HAD INVOLVED YOUR STAKEHOLDERS.
AND NO ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT, CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.
UH, LET'S MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE.
I'M VALERIE RODRIGUEZ, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE POLICY ADMINISTRATION TEAM.
ITEM NUMBER ONE IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-C-P-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR JOURNEYMAN GROUP.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 1 9 3 0 2 BABCOCK ROAD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 5 5.
AND THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 17.58 ACRES AND IS LOCATED WITHIN COUNCIL DISTRICT EIGHT.
THE OWNER IS JOURNEYMAN GROUP AND THE CONSULTANT IS BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP.
THE PROJECT IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AS SUCH, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S-E-P-H-C-P TO MITIGATE IMPACTS TO THE S-C-P-H-C-P COVERAGE SPECIES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDES 3.47 ACRES OF GOLDEN.
SHE WARBLER GCW HABITAT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND 27.87 ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE PROJECT AREA WILL REQUIRE A TOTAL OF 21 GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CAT BURIAL BCV HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY BCV CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED OVER CAR ZONE ONE, A TOTAL OF 17.58 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CAR ZONE ONE AND THE PROJECT AREA IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS BUT IS WITHIN 750 FEET OF AN OCCUPIED FEATURE.
PARTICIPATION IN THE S-E-P-H-C-P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS OF $168,000 OCCUPIED CARS FEATURE WITH OCCUPIED CAVE ZONE, A ACCESS PARTICIPATION FEE OF $400,000.
AN OCCUPIED CARS FEATURE WITH OCCUPIED CAVE CAVE ZONE B ACCESS PARTICIPATION FEE OF $40,000 AND A PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $60,800.
THE APPLICANT HAS PAID THE $2,500 APPLICATION FEE AND THE APP APPLICATION.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF 668
[00:05:01]
$800, I'M SORRY, $668,800 PRIOR TO COMPLETING ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGIST IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
WE'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS FROM MY FAR LEFT, NO QUESTIONS? SURE.
HEARING NO QUESTIONS CAN WE HAVE A MOTION? A MOTION TO APPROVE? ALRIGHT.
I'LL GIVE IT TO COMMISSIONER GLARY.
ALRIGHT, CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL? VOTE PLEASE.
AND THEN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
ITEM NUMBER TWO IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-E-P-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS INCORPORATED.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SCENIC LOOP ROAD AND BABCOCK ROAD.
THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 248.59 ACRES AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ETJ.
THE OWNER IS LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS AND THE CONSULTANT IS P DAWSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AS SUCH, THE APPLICATION WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S-C-P-H-C-B TO MITIGATE IMPACTS TO THE S-C-P-H-C-P COVERED SPECIES FROM DEVELOPMENT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
PROJECT AREA INCLUDES 132 POINT 53 ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER GCW HABITAT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND 80.94 ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE PROJECT AREA WILL REQUIRE A TOTAL OF 302 POINT 11 GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS.
SORRY, THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CAPPED AREA BCV HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY BCV CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED WITHIN CARONE THREE A AND CARONE FOUR B.
THE TOTAL A TOTAL OF 17.62 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CARONE THREE A AND A TOTAL OF 230.97 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CARONE FOUR B.
THE PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED WITHIN, IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS, NOR IS IT WITHIN 750 FEET OF AN OCCUPIED FEATURE.
PARTICIPATION IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS OF $2,416,880 CARONE THREE AND FOUR PARTICIPATION FEES OF $17,620 AND A PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $243,450.
THE APPLICANT HAS PAID THE $2,500 APPLICATION FEE AND THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF $2,667,000 $950.
SORRY TO COMPLETE ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGIST IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
UH, STARTING WITH COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS FROM MY LEFT? SURE.
UM, BASED ON THE VOICEMAIL THAT WAS PLAYED, HE HAD INDICATED THAT THERE WERE NEW ENDANGERED SPECIES LISTED IN BEXAR COUNTY.
THIS IS JENNY BLAIR WITH BLAIR WILDLIFE CONSULTING.
UM, SO THERE ARE NO NEW LISTED ENDANGERED SPECIES, UM, UH, THAT WE ARE AWARE OF THAT HAVE BEEN RECENTLY LISTED SINCE FISH AND WILDLIFE.
UM, THE PLAN, UM, WE HAVE OUR COVERED SPECIES IN WHICH THE PLAN, YOU KNOW, COVERS AND THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE PURVIEW OVER.
IF A PROJECT DID HAVE A SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, A SALAMANDER THAT WE, WE DON'T COVER, THEN WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO APPROVE ENROLLMENT FOR A PROJECT SUCH AS THAT.
I GUESS JUST A, A HYPOTHETICAL, SAY WE HAD THAT SALAMANDER AT SOME POINT, COULD THIS PERMIT BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THAT, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEXT 20 HOURS? WE YEAH, THE, THE KEY, THE, I GUESS THE PERMITTEES COULD DECIDE TO AMEND THE PLAN AS NECESSARY TO ADD SPECIES ONTO IT IN THE FUTURE AT SUCH TIME AS THEY'RE LISTED.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? TO MY LEFT, TO MY RIGHT.
I'LL TAKE A MOTION THEN ONE FOR A MOTION.
[00:10:01]
SECOND.AND CAN WE GET A ROLL CALL VOTE CHAIR SPARROW? YES.
AND WE'LL TAKE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE.
THIS IS RILEY BOSER, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT POLICY ADMINISTRATION TEAM.
ITEM NUMBER THREE IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-E-P-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM.
UM, APPLICATION ENDING IN 0 0 0 8.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ALONG IH 10 FROM LA ERO PARKWAY THROUGH CAMP BULLIS ROAD.
THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 13.886 ACRES AND IS LOCATED WITHIN COUNCIL DISTRICT EIGHT.
THE OWNER IS SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM AND THE CONSULTANT IS SWCA INCORPORATED SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AS SUCH, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S-E-P-H-C-P TO MITIGATE IMPACTS TO THE S-E-P-H-C-P COVERED SPECIES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDES 0.4 ACRES OF GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER GCW HABITAT WITH WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND 17 POINT 11 ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE PROJECT AREA WILL REQUIRE A TOTAL OF 10 GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BLACK CAP VERIO BCV HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY BCV CONSERVATION CREDITS.
THE PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED OVER CAR ONE AND CAR STONE FOUR BA TOTAL OF 8.31 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CARONE ONE AND A TOTAL OF 5.58 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CARONE FOUR B.
THE PROJECT AREA IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS NOR IS IT WITHIN 750 FEET OF AN OCCUPIED FEATURE.
PARTICIPATION IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS FEE OF $80,000 CARONE ONE AND TWO, PARTICIPATION FEE OF $8,310 AND A PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $8,831.
THE APPLICANT HAS PAID THE $2,500 A APPLICATION FEE.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF $97,141.
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGIST IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS FROM MY LEFT? NO QUESTION.
AND FROM MY RIGHT HEARING NONE CAN WE GET A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND? SECOND.
ALRIGHT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON S-C-P-A-H-C-P APPLICATION FOR OLD CAMP BULLIS PARTNERS LTD APPLICATION ENDING IN 0 0 0 6.
THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 61 94 OLD CAMP BULLAS ROAD.
THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 4.393 ACRES AND IS LOCATED WITHIN COUNCIL DISTRICT EIGHT.
THE OWNER IS OLD CAMP BULLIS PARTNERS LTD.
THE CONSULTANT IS BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP.
OLD CAMP BULLISH PARTNERS IS CONSIDERING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AS SUCH, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ENROLL IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P TO MITIGATE IMPACT TO THE S-C-P-H-C-P COVERED SPECIES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
PROJECT AREA INCLUDES ZERO ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND 6.39 ACRES OF GCW HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA.
THE PROJECT AREA WILL REQUIRE, WILL REQUIRE A TOTAL OF 3.5 GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS.
PROJECT AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY BCV HABITAT AND WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY BCV CONSERVATION CREDITS.
PROJECT AREA IS LOCATED OVER CARONE ONE AND CARONE FOUR BA TOTAL OF 3.91 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CAR ONE AND A TOTAL OF 0.48 ACRES OCCURS WITHIN CAR ZONE FOUR B.
THE PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY CRITICAL HABITAT UNITS, NOR IS IT WITHIN 750 FEET OF AN OCCUPIED FEATURE.
[00:15:02]
PARTICIPATION IN THE S-C-P-H-C-P FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING GCW CONSERVATION CREDITS FEE OF $28,000 CAR ZONE ONE AND TWO, PARTICIPATION FEE OF $3,910 AND A PLAN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $3,191.THE APPLICANT HAS PAID THE $2,500 APPLICATION FEE.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FULL MITIGATION FEE OF $35,101 PRIOR TO COMPLETING ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OUR BIOLOGISTS IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MY LEFT? GO AHEAD.
SO JENNY, 'CAUSE THIS, THIS A LITTLE BIT NEW.
UM, SO IS THAT GOLDEN CHEEK WARBLER HABITAT THAT THEY ACTUALLY WITHIN THAT AREA THAT'S INDIRECT FOR THIS BUT BECAUSE THERE IS NO HABITAT ON THEIR PROPERTY, IT'S INDIRECTLY IMPACTING IT.
SO THE PLAN REQUIRES THAT WHEN WE'RE WE'RE ASSESSING IMPACTS FOR WARBLER HABITAT, WE HAVE TO TALK OR WE HAVE TO ASSESS WHAT IS WITHIN THE PROPERTY TO BE ENROLLED ITSELF IN ALL HABITAT SURROUNDING IT UP TO 300 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
AND SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S ONLY INDIRECT IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ONE.
'CAUSE WITHIN THE PROPERTY ITSELF, THERE, THERE ISN'T ANY EDGE THAT, UM, EXTENDS IN FROM THE SURROUNDING HABITAT, BUT THERE IS SURROUNDING HABITAT WITHIN 300 FEET.
IT'S LIKE, WELL THERE'S ONLY LIKE MAYBE THREE TREES ON THERE SO IT'S CORRECT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM MY LEFT, FROM MY RIGHT? IF NOT, CAN WE GET A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE? SECOND.
SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
AND CAN WE HAVE ROLL CALL VOTE MR. GLARY? AYE.
LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OUR NOVEMBER 25TH MEETING.
WERE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES? I BELIEVE I HAVE A CORRECTION IF I CAN HAVE BRUNA COME UP FOR A SECOND.
UH, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE THE, THE COMMENT THAT'S THERE REGARDING WHAT YOU STATED AT THE LAST MEETING, BUT YOU KNOW, I HAD ASKED THE QUESTION THAT BECAUSE GU LTE RANCHES, YOU KNOW, ABOUT 1100 ACRE DEVELOPMENT MM-HMM
OF WHICH I DON'T KNOW WHAT 300 ACRES SO FAR HAS BEEN STUDIED AT THIS POINT THAT WITHIN THAT REMAINING 800 ACRES, IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THAT THERE MIGHT BE A CONSERVATION EASEMENT THAT YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO PRESENT TO THE, THE S-C-P-H-C-P? UM, THAT THE, THE WAY THAT THIS IS WRITTEN, IT LOOKS LIKE IT JUST INDICATED THAT THAT WAS GONNA COME UP ON THIS AGENDA, WHICH IT'S NOT.
UH, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT CLARIFIED IT BE, IF WE COULD CORRECT THAT THERE'S NO PLANS FOR, UM, A BANK LIKE YOU, LIKE YOU ASKED RIGHT.
RATHER THAN ENROLLMENT WE ARE ENROLLING BY THE PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
BUT IN, IN THAT FUTURE 800 ACRES STILL YET TO BE STUDIED, IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THAT OF THAT THERE MIGHT BE.
WHAT WAS MY QUESTION? SO MY, I'M NOT A BIOLOGIST, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE QUALITY, UH, OF THE HABITAT FOR WARBLER WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR, UM, FOR US TO BE ABLE TO, UH, MAKE A BANK OUT OF IT.
UM, WE HAVE STUDIED THE ENTIRE AREA.
WE'RE JUST ENROLLING AS NEEDED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
THIS IS A VERY LARGE DEVELOPMENT, SO I AM UNAWARE OF US PROPOSING TO CREATE CREDITS OUT OF THIS PROJECT FOR WARBLER.
SO IF, IF WE WERE TO AMEND THE MINUTES TO THIS MEETING TO SPECIFY THAT AT THIS TIME THERE IS NO PLANS FOR A BANK THAT YOU INTEND TO ENROLL BY PHASE DEVELOPMENT, YOU WOULD SAY THAT'S ACCURATE? YES.
IS THAT MORE CLEAR FOR THE MINUTES? YES, THAT COULD BE CORRECTED.
SO CAN WE HAVE A MOTION AS AMENDED TO INCLUDE THAT LANGUAGE? UH, I MOVE TO APPROVE WITH THE AMENDED LANGUAGE AS JUST DISCUSSED.
[00:20:01]
YES.APPROVE WITH AMENDMENTS? ALRIGHT, THE TIME IS THREE 50 AND THAT CONCLUDES THE MEETING.