[00:00:06]
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THE TIME IS NOW 2:07 P.M. ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026, AND THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ZONING AND LAND USE SESSION IS CALLED TO ORDER.
EVERYBODY, PLEASE TO YOUR SEATS. THE CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL ROLL.
>> CLERK: MAYOR PRO TEM, WE HAVE QUORUM. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. FOR THE RECORD, ITEMS 12 AND 13 HAVE BEEN POSTPONED AND WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED TODAY. WE HAVE A FEW ITEMS TO CONTINUE TO THE APRIL 2, 2026 MEETING, 2 AND 16. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MADAME CLERK, HAS ANYONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK?
JACK FINGER, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 16. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR SAN ANTONIO CITY COUNCIL. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS JACK M. FINGER. MR. MAYOR PRO TEM, I BELIEVE YOU ASKED ME TO PRESENT ON
ITEM NO. 16, DID YOU SAY? >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: 2 AND 16, PLEASE.
>> YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NO. 16, I'VE GOT QUITE A FEW, SO IT WILL TAKE ME A WHILE TO PAGE THESE PAGES HERE.
ZONING CASE IN DISTRICT NO. 5, MS. CASTILLO, THAT'S IN YOUR AREA.
IT'S ABOUT, WELL, WHERE THE ZONING STAFF RECOMMENDED DENIAL.
WHAT DID THEY SUGGEST WE DENY ABOUT? IT'S ABOUT CHANGING A RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIFAMILY, LIKE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT THERE.
THE STATEMENTS ON THIS, PRETTY BAD ONES HERE, IS ABOUT TRYING TO MAKE A BED AND BREAKFAST BETWEEN TWO EXTREMES. TWO EXTREMES.
ONE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THE OTHER ONE IS THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AREAS. NO BUFFERS BETWEEN THOSE, MS. CASTILLO.
ALSO, ANOTHER BIG THING WE SAW HERE IS -- IF YOU WOULD LOOK AT THE FLOODPLAIN SHOWN IN YOUR AREA THERE. HERE'S A MAP OF IT THERE. BLOW THAT UP, IF YOU WOULD, MR. AUDIO-VISUAL MAN. IT'S HARD TO SEE IT THERE. YEAH.
THE MIDDLE RED BLOCKED AREA IS THE PROPOSAL. THE FLOODPLAIN IS THOSE BLUE LINES THERE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE FLOODPLAIN IS OVER HALF OF THE PROPOSED AREA. AND THE QUESTION BECOMES WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A BIG, GIGANTIC FLOOD COMES AND THOSE PEOPLE ARE FLOODED OUT? YEAH. BIG QUESTION LOOMING OVER THIS.
CONSEQUENTLY, MAYBE INSTEAD OF JUST CONTINUE IT, SAY NO TO THE WHOLE DARN THING RIGHT HERE AND NOW. THANK YOU. NOW, THE OTHER ONE, ALSO ON CONTINUANCE, IS THE -- QUITE A FEW HERE. PATIENT.
YEAH. ITEM NO. 1, WHICH IS THE ALCOHOL VARIANCE --
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: ITEM 2, PLEASE. 2 AND 16.
>> OKAY. MY MISTAKE. YES, OKAY.
ITEM NO. 2. ALCOHOL VARIANCE OVER IN LACKLAND ELEMENTARY.
YES. RIGHT NEAR THE LACKLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THE VIRGINIA ALLRED STACEY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL . YES.
WHY DOES ANYONE WANT TO ALLOW ALCOHOL TO BE SOLD RIGHT NEXT TO WHERE SCHOOL KIDS CROSS? HUH? I HAVE NO IDEA.
BUT WHY NOT JUST SAY NO TO BOTH OF THESE WHILE YOU HAVE A CHANCE?
THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU.
IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON THE ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED? THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CONTINUE ITEMS 2 AND 16 TO APRIL 2, 2026.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OUR NEXT ITEMS TO CONTINUE TO THE APRIL 16, 2026 MEETING ARE ITEMS 8 AND 9. IS THERE A MOTION TO
[00:05:05]
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE ONE CITIZEN SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
MR. JACK FINGER. THESE ARE 8 AND 9, MR. FINGER.
>> ITEMS 8 AND 9. MR. MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, MY NAME IS JACK FINGER, ONCE AGAIN, AND WHAT DO 8 AND 9 DEAL WITH? A NUMBER OF RED FLAGS HERE. ZONING STAFF THOUGHT THAT THIS PROPOSAL ABOUT CHANGING SOMETHING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL. YEAH.
IT'S OVER ON RIGSBY AVENUE AND IT'S IN -- MS. VIAGRAN, IT'S IN YOUR AREA THERE.
YEAH, I THINK YOU'VE SEEN THESE BEFORE. AND THE CONSEQUENCE ABOUT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES DIRECTLY ABUT THIS USED CAR LOT. IT ALLOWS FURTHER COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT INTO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW, MS. VIAGRAN, THESE ARE NOT MY WORDS. THESE ARE FROM ZONING STAFF. AND YES, RIGHT THERE -- THAT'S RIGHT ON RIGSBY AVENUE. WHY CAN'T WE SIMPLY SAY NO TO THIS, MS. VIAGRAN RIGHT HERE AND NOW AND STOP PUTTING US THROUGH ALL THIS TORMENT HERE. YEAH. PLEASE RE-EXAMINE THIS AND
SIMPLY SAY NO TO IT. THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CONTINUE ITEMS 8 AND 9 TO APRIL 16, 2026. PLEASE VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES. WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE LISTED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
ITEMS 3, 4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, AND 20. THE REMAINING ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
DO ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD
INDIVIDUALLY? .>> TO BE LISTED FOR INDIVIDUAL BECAUSE WE HAVE CONDITIONS TO READ IN ON THAT AS WELL.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE ONE CITIZEN SIGNED UP TO SPEAK FOR ITEMS REMAINING
ON CONSENT. THAT IS JACK FINGER. >> THIS IS GETTING MONOTONOUS. MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
ONCE AGAIN, JACK FINGER IS HERE AND HE'S TRYING TO TELL YOU THAT A COUPLE OF ITEMS YOU MAY WISH TO GIVE FURTHER CONSIDERATION INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER-STAMPING THEM ARE ITEMS 1 AND 7. 7 ESPECIALLY I WANT TO CONCENTRATE ON.
IT'S ABOUT, OH, CHANGING SOMETHING FROM INDUSTRIAL TO IDZ.
THIS IS OVER IN, WELL, MS. KAUR, THIS IS IN YOUR DISTRICT THERE.
YEAH. AS SHE'S TWIDDLING WITH HER LAPTOP THERE.
YEAH. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REASONS WHY THIS IS A BAD IDEA. A LOT OF PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS A BAD IDEA AT THE ZONING HEARINGS. YEAH, MS. KAUR, THE SOHO CROSSING HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION OPPOSED IT. WHY? THEY SAW MAJOR PARKING PROBLEMS OVER THERE, MS. KAUR . THEY DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT THE PROSPECT, BECAUSE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE RELAXED FOR THIS PROPOSAL, THEY FEAR THAT PEOPLE AND, NATURALLY SO, ARE GOING TO PARK RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEIR HOMES IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA THERE. THEY DON'T WANT THAT.
THEY SEE MORE ACCIDENTS TAKING PLACE BECAUSE OF THAT CONGESTION.
ALONG WITH THAT, WHEN YOU HAVE THE SURROUNDING AREAS OF THE 200-FOOT PERIMETER, THE ZONING STAFF ASKED ALL THOSE PEOPLE AROUND THERE HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD APPROVE THIS, HOW MANY OF YOU DON'T LIKE IT. AND AS MUCH AS -- OUT OF 57 NOTICES, 10 OPPOSED IT. THAT'S NEARLY 20%. WHEN YOU GET ANYTHING OVER AND ABOVE 5% OR 10%, MS. KAUR, THAT'S A LEVEL OF CONCERN.
PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF WHAT'S GOING ON THERE. THEY DON'T LIKE IT.
THIS IS OVER ON EAST MYRTLE STREET. SO, WHY WOULD YOU, AND FOR THAT MATTER EVERY ONE OF YOU HERE ON THIS COUNCIL, WANT TO GO AHEAD AND CREATE ALL
[00:10:06]
THESE HEADACHES FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO STILL LIVE IN THAT AREA THERE? PLEASE, IF YOU WOULD, RECONSIDER. PULL THIS ONE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION AND SAY NO TO IT. OKAY?THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE ANY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO INDIVIDUAL ITEMS. STAFF, PLEASE START WITH ITEMS 3 AND 4.
>> AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 201 EAST COURTLAND PLACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL. BOTH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. STAFF MAILED 39 NOTICES.
ZERO WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED. AND THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE TOBIN HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THANK YOU.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE TWO RESIDENTS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
JACK FINGER. >> WELL, HELLO ONCE AGAIN, EVERYBODY.
MY NAME IS JACK FINGER AND ONCE AGAIN THESE PARTICULAR ITEMS ARE JUST, AS WE MENTIONED JUST A MOMENT AGO, IN DISTRICT 1, MS. KAUR'S DISTRICT, WHO DECIDED TO GO RIGHT AHEAD WITH THE PROPOSAL ON THE OTHER ONE THERE.
MS. KAUR, THE REASON THESE HAVE SO MANY RED FLAGS HERE THAT YOU HAVE A PENCHANT FOR TRYING TO IGNORE IS BECAUSE THE ZONING STAFF, NOT JUST THE PLANNING STAFF BUT THE ZONING STAFF SAID PLEASE DON'T DO THIS. AND WHY DID THEY SAY PLEASE DON'T DO THIS? YOU'RE TRYING TO SHOEHORN FIVE UNITS, FIVE UNITS IN THAT AREA WHERE THE ULTIMATE MAXIMUM IS A MERE FOUR. AND CONSEQUENTLY, THERE ARE PEOPLE AROUND THERE WHO HAVE TO LIVE IN THE AREA WHERE THERE ARE FIVE UNITS SHOEHORNED INTO THE FOUR . IT'S COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA THAT YOU'RE PLACING THIS STUFF IN, MS. KAUR. YEAH.
OVER THERE ON EAST COURTLAND STREET. WHY DO WE HAVE TO -- WHY DO WE HAVE TO KEEP JUST IGNORING WHAT THE STAFF TELLS US? ESPECIALLY WHEN WE PAY THEM TO DO THEIR JOBS IN TELLING US IS IT A GOOD IDEA OR A BAD IDEA. SO, MS. KAUR, PLEASE, AT THE RISK OF SEEMING MONOTONOUS, DON'T DO THIS. TELL THEM NO, OKAY? AS THE REST OF YOU GUYS AS WELL. EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU HAVE YOUR OWN INDIVIDUAL VOTE ON THIS ONE. YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO ALONG WITH THE FLOW IF YOU DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW? OH, YES. THANK YOU.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. ANDREW WEAVER.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS. I AM THE APPLICANT FOR THE PROPERTY AT 201 EAST COURTLAND PLACE. PRESENTLY ZONED RM-4.
I'M HERE TO CORRECT THE ZONING. ORIGINALLY, THE CITY STAFF HAD RECOMMENDED MF-33. WENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BECAUSE THAT WOULD REQUIRE A CHANGE OF THE AREA UNDER THE MID-CITY'S AREA PLAN.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THAT RECOMMENDATION TO YOU.
AT THE END OF THAT MEETING, MR. BUSTAMANTE, ALSO THE CHAIR OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, ASKED THAT I AMEND MY REQUEST AND TURN IT INTO IDZ-2 WITH THE PERMISSION FOR FIVE DWELLING UNITS, WHICH I DID, WHICH THE ZONING COMMISSION THEN UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. IT IS NOT MY INTENT TO CHANGE THIS PROPERTY.
MY INTENT IS TO CORRECT THE ZONING. MY INTENT FOR THIS OLD 1929 HOUSE, WHICH HAS PARKING FOR SIX -- SO THERE IS ONE FOR EVERY UNIT -- IS TO BE A SAFE AND STABLE MEMBER OF THE TOBIN HILL COMMUNITY. I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE TOBIN HILL COMMUNITY, MR. SHELL, AND HE SAID MY REQUEST WAS CONSISTENT WITH
[00:15:03]
THE PROPERTY AND THE TOBIN HILL ORGANIZATION HAD NO ORGANIZATIONS.SO I APPRECIATE THE TIME. AND THE COUNCILWOMAN HAS BEEN SUPER.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SUBJECT TO ANY QUESTIONS. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU, MR. WEAVER. WE'LL FINISH UP WITH THIS ITEM BUT FOR THE REST OF PUBLIC COMMENT, WE'RE GOING TO REDUCE TO ONE MINUTE SO WE CAN RETAIN A QUORUM.
ITEMS 3 AND 4 ARE IN DISTRICT 1. COUNCILMEMBER KAUR, YOU'RE
RECOGNIZED TO SPEAK. >> KAUR: THANK YOU. AS COUNCILMEMBER MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ, THE LAST NAME IS PRONOUNCED KAUR, LIKE THE CORE OF AN APPLE AND NOT CAR LIKE THE CAR THAT YOU DRIVE. CORE OF AN APPLE.
WITH THAT, I MOTION TO APPROVE AS READ. >> SECOND.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEMS 10 AND 11.
AT 904 PLEASANTON ROAD AND 347 WEST SAYERS AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE ON THE 904 PLEASANTON ROAD PROPERTY AND DENIAL ON 347 ON WEST SAYERS. 27 NOTICED MAILED, ONE IN FAVOR, ONE OPPOSED, AND THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE ST. LEO'S NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION .
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE ONE RESIDENT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
MR. FINGER, YOU WILL HAVE ONE MINUTE FOR EACH OF THE ITEMS.
>> MR. MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR SO ILLUSTRIOUS CITY COUNCIL.
YUCK, YUCK, YUCK. ITEMS NO. 10 AND 11 , ABOUT THE SAME CASE.
IT'S ABOUT CHANGING SOMETHING FROM -- OH, SOMETHING THAT'S COMMERCIAL TO ACTUALLY IT'S TOWARDS RESIDENTIAL. BUT IT'S ABOUT TWO DIFFERENT --F DIFFERENT AREAS ABUTTING EACH OTHER, APPARENTLY. IT'S ABOUT TRYING TO PUT -- THE REASON THE ZONING STAFF AND THE PLANNING STAFF, ONCE AGAIN, THOUGHT THAT AT LEAST PART OF THIS WAS A BAD IDEA. MS. VIAGRAN, THIS IS IN YOUR DISTRICT THERE.
IT'S ABOUT -- ESPECIALLY OVER ON THE WEST SAYERS AVENUE AREA.
THEY THOUGHT THAT TRYING TO PUT A PARKING LOT IN AN AREA SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTS TO
THE EAST AND TO THE SOUTH. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU, MR. FINGER.
>> THAT'S ALL THREE MINUTES? >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: ONE MINUTE EACH.
10 AND 11 ARE IN DISTRICT 3. COUNCILMEMBER VIAGRAN. >> VIAGRAN: THANK YOU, MAYOR. I WANT TO THANK THE APPLICANT FOR MEETING WITH ME ON THIS CASE AND THANK THE ZONING COMMISSION FOR THEIR WORK AND THEIR DILIGENT REVIEW. I BELIEVE THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BRING THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THIS CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED PARCELS.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, I WILL MAKE THE FOLLOWING MOTION: MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> SECOND. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. UP NEXT WE HAVE ITEMS 14 AND 15. WE HAVE ONE RESIDENT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
JACK FINGER. >> WELL, THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. EXCUSE ME, COULD YOU PLEASE ADJUST THE -- CITY CLERK,
ADJUST THE TIMER HERE. IT ONLY SHOWS ONE MINUTE. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: IT'S
ONE MINUTE FOR THE REST OF THE ITEMS. >> HE CHANGED THE TIME TO ONE MINUTE? HA, HA, HA. YEAH.
WELL, I CAN SEE WHY. WE HAVE DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF PEOPLE HERE WAITING TO SPEAK. I MEAN, I CAN SEE WHY IT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY TAKE UP YOUR TIME THERE, MR. MAYOR PRO TEM. YEAH.
WELL, ANYWAY, 14 AND 15. LET'S SEE, WHAT ARE THEY? WELL, IT'S ABOUT CHANGING SOMETHING FROM, OH, RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL. AND THE REASON THE STAFF ON BOTH OF THESE GUYS THOUGHT THAT OVER HERE ON WEST HART AVENUE THAT IT WAS A BAD
[00:20:01]
IDEA IS BECAUSE IT IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENCES. THERE ARE NO BUFFERS.FOR ALL OF YOU WHO WANT TO HEAR SOME TRUTH IN THE ONE MINUTE I HAVE HERE, THE COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT RESULTING TRAFFIC AND NOISE WILL AFFECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHAT MORE REASONS DO YOU NEED TO SAY NO TO THIS DARN THING? HUH? YEAH.
I MEAN, HEY, YOU DON'T LIKE MY COMING UP HERE MR. MAYOR PRO TEM ONLY WITH ONE MINUTE, HEY, IT'S WHAT YOU VOTED FOR. IT'S WHAT YOU SIGNED YOUR NAME TO THE DOTTED LINE FOR WHEN YOU FIRST APPLIED HERE, SIR.
THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU FOR THE CONCLUSION OF
YOUR 14TH MINUTE. >> AGENDA ITEMS 14 AND 15 LOCATED AT 206 WEST HART AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
STAFF MAILED 27 NOTICES, ONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED, AND THERE IS NO RESPONSE FROM THE ST. LEO'S NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THANK YOU.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: ITEMS 14 AND 15 ARE IN DISTRICT 5. COUNCILMEMBER CASTILLO.
>> CASTILLO: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM. THANK YOU TO THE APPLICANT AND THE FAMILY. I APPRECIATE THE EXPANSION AND THE GONZABA TEAM FOR PROVIDING THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A POINT OF CONTACT IF ISSUES ARISE WITH TRAFFIC, PARKING, OR SOUND CONCERNS THAT MAY IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I ALSO APPRECIATE GONZABA'S COMMITMENT TO TRASH PICK UP. THIS WILL HELP SUPPORT THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE AROUND THE FACILITY AS IT EXPANDS WITH THIS AMENDMENT AND ZONING CHANGE. WITH THE COMMITMENTS TO ONGOING COLLABORATION AND SUPPORT FOR A SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, I MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 14 AND 15.
>> VIAGRAN: SECOND. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEMS 17
AND 18. >> AGENDA ITEMS 17 AND 18.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 7439 WEST MILITARY DRIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING CONDITION BE ADDED.
THERE WILL BE NO TEMPORARY SIGNAGE. 30 NOTICES WERE MAILED, SIX RETURNED IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED, AND THE LACKLAND TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR . THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE RESIDENT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
JACK FINGER. >> WELL, MR. MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS JACK M. FINGER AND I SEE ONCE AGAIN I HAVE LESS THAN A MINUTE WHEN WE NORMALLY GET THREE MINUTES HERE AT THIS PODIUM, MR. MAYOR PRO TEM. YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU EVEN GIVE ME A WHOLE ONE MINUTE. WHY NOT MAKE IT 15 SECONDS OR 30 SECONDS? YOU SEE THE HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE LINED UP BEFORE ME.
I MEAN, YOU DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF TIME NOW, DO YOU? HUH, HUH? YEAH. 17 AND 18, WELL, IT'S ABOUT PUTTING SOME, OH, TRAILER PARK HOMES, SERVICE STORAGE AND SO FORTH. WHAT DID THE STAFF SAY ABOUT IT? YOU WANT TO PLACE INDUSTRIAL USE RIGHTS NEXT TO THE RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON ONE SIDE, APARTMENT HOMES ON ANOTHER AND MODERATE COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST WITH NO BUFFERS. NO BUFFERS, MR. GALVAN.
YOU REALLY WANT TO SAY YES TO THIS AND LET YOUR PEOPLE SUFFER AS TIME GOES BY? YEAH. WELL, BY GOLLY, YOU CERTAINLY KNOW WHAT'S BEST.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. 17 AND 18 ARE IN DISTRICT 6.
COUNCILMEMBER GALVAN. >> GALVAN: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM.
MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITIONS AS READ. I THANK ALL THE RESIDENTS WHO RESPONDED TO THE ZONING REQUEST IN SUPPORT. THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 19. >> ITEM 19 CASE] LOCATED AT 6464 HISTORIC OLD HIGHWAY 90.
STAFF AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED
[00:25:01]
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION BE ADDED: NO TEMPORARY SIGNAGE.AND THERE ARE NO REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS WITHIN 200 FEET.
THANK YOU. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU.
WE HAVE NO RESIDENTS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM 19. COUNCILMEMBER GALVAN.
>> GALVAN: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM. MOTION TO APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS AS READ. >> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 20.
>> ITEM 20 LANE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL. ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. 35 NOTICES WERE MAILED, SEVEN WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED. OUTSIDE OF THE 200-FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY, ONE ADDITIONAL NOTICE WAS RETURNED IN FAVOR. LASTLY, THE CULEBRA PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN FAVOR. THANK YOU.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE RESIDENT SIGNED
UP TO SPEAK. MR. JACK FINGER. >> YES.
WELL, MR. MAYOR PRO TEM, OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR SAN ANTONIO CITY COUNCIL.
GIVE THE CITIZENS SUCH A GENEROUS AMOUNT OF TIME TO SPEAK.
YEAH. ITEM NO. 20 WELL, INTO SOMETHING WHERE IT'S REALLY INAPPROPRIATE. I'LL LET THE PROFESSIONALS SPEAK FOR ME. IF WE CAN READ IT WITHIN ONE MINUTE.
YEAH. IF YOU CAN SEE THE UNDERLINED AREA, BLOW THAT UP, MR. AUDIO-VISUAL MAN. SEE WHAT YOU CAN SEE WITH THE UNDERLINED AREA THERE.
A LITTLE MORE, IF YOU WOULD. BASICALLY, THERE WE GO. OH, YEAH.
GOT SO MUCH TIME. REQUESTING ZONING CHANGE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE ESTABLISHED LAND USE. BASICALLY, NON-CONFORMING PARKING ON THE PROPERTY DISAD[INDISCERNIBLE] FURTHERMOR, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, AND MY TIME IS NOW UP.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: THANK YOU. >> OH, YOU'RE SO GENEROUS.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: I'LL RELAY THAT YOU MISSED MAYOR JONES AND THE TIME SHE WOULD GIVE YOU. ITEM 20 IS IN DISTRICT 7. I UNDERSTAND COUNCILMAN
WHYTE WILL MAKE A MOTION. >> WHYTE: THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM.
COUNCILWOMAN ALDERETE GAVITO COULD NOT BE HERE TODAY SO SHE ASKED THAT I CARRY HER INTENTIONS TO THE DAIS. ITEM 20 HAS BEEN POSITIVELY RECEIVED BY THE CULEBRA PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE COUNCILWOMAN THANKS THEM FOR THEIR COLLABORATION ON THIS ITEM. IT'S INTENDED TO PROVIDE PARKING FOR THE ADJACENT FOOD TRUCK PARK IN ANTICIPATION OF FUTURE AMENITIES.
RATHER THAN PLACING THE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE FOOD TRUCK PARK ITSELF, IT'S GOING TO BE RIGHT THERE NEXT TO IT. THE COMMUNITY SUPPORTS THE ITEM AND ZONING COMMISSION ALSO APPROVED THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
SO WITH THAT, WE MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 20. >> VIAGRAN: SECOND.
>> MCKEE-RODRIGUEZ: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES. THAT CONCLUDES TODAY'S ZONING AND LAND USE SESSION.
THE TIME IS NOW 2:36 P.M. AND THE MEETING IS NOW ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.