Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:01]

OKAY, IT'S TWO O'CLOCK.

IS UH, STAFF READY WITH THE VIDEO? IS EVERYBODY READY TO GET STARTED? YES.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND PLAY THE VIDEO.

[Call to Order]

OKAY.

IT'S 2 0 1 AND WE ARE CALLING TODAY'S, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION.

MEETING.

TO ORDER, CAN STAFF DO THE ATTENDANCE COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA PRESENT.

COMMISSIONER RO EGRIN PRESENT.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO PRESENT, COMMISSIONER MCGEE PRESENT.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ PRESENT, COMMISSIONER PECK PRESENT, COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ, PRESENT CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER GARCIA PRESENT, A QUORUM IS PRESENT.

THANK YOU.

NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZENS TO BE HEARD.

IF YOU HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, YOU CAN CHOOSE TO SPEAK NOW OR WAIT FOR YOUR INDIVIDUAL ITEM TO BE BROUGHT UP FOR HEARING AND SPEAK.

AT THAT TIME, REMEMBER TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND EACH CITIZEN WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME? JUST TO LET THEM KNOW THAT THE TWO ITEMS THAT ARE ON INDIVIDUAL THAT HAVE PEOPLE SIGN IN TO SPEAK ARE, UM, ITEM NUMBER EIGHT AND ITEM NUMBER 11.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS ELIGIBLE FOR CONSENT.

IT LOOKS LIKE EVERYONE WILL SPEAK WHEN THEIR ITEM IS GOING TO BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY.

[Consent Agenda]

SO TODAY WE HAVE TWO AGENDAS.

OUR FIRST AGENDA IS THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.

CASES ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA ARE CASES WHERE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER DISCUSSION AND FIND NO ONE OF THE AUDIENCE IS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM.

ALL CASES WE READ INTO THE RECORD FOR ONE UNIFIED OMNIBUS MOTION.

IF SOMEONE HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THE AN ITEM, THEN THAT ITEM WILL BE MOVED TO THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.

THE SECOND AGENDA FOR TODAY IS THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA IN WHICH CASES WILL BE DISCUSSED SEPARATELY PRIOR TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

MAKING A MOTION ON THE AGENDA WILL BE AGAIN, WITH THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA AND CURRENTLY AS STATED BEFORE, UH, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEMS NUMBER EIGHT AND 11, THE REMAINDER WILL BE ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA.

AND IF STAFF CAN, UM, GO AHEAD AND READ THAT INTO THE RECORD.

AFTERNOON, CHRIS MCCOLLINS, SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF ITEMS EIGHT AND 11, WHICH HAVE BEEN PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

THE BALANCE OF TODAY'S AGENDA WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMISSION UNDER A SINGLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE COMBINED HEARING AGENDA? MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER PECK AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

WILL STAFF TO THE ROLL CALL VOTE.

COMMISSIONER PECK AYE.

COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

AYE.

COMMISSIONER ROYAL LAG GREENY? YES.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO? YES.

COMMISSIONER MCGEE? YES.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ? YES.

COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ? YES.

CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.

YES.

MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU.

NEXT WILL BE THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA,

[8. 19-8544 (Continued from 11/13/19) PLAN AMENDMENT CASE PA-2019-11600080 (Council District 2): A request by Drought, Drought & Bobbitt, LLP, Representative, for approval of a Resolution to amend the Government Hill Neighborhood Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City, by changing the future land use from “Low Density Residential" to "Neighborhood Commercial" on the east 3.3 feet of the south 118 feet of Lot 11 and the south 118 feet of Lot 12, Block 6, NCB 1177, located at 2551 North Interstate 35. Staff recommends Denial. (Associated Zoning Case Z-2019-10700208) (Patricia Franco, Planner (210) 207-5876, patricia.franco@sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department).]

AND THE FIRST ITEM WILL BE ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, TRICIA FRANCO.

ZONING LOCATED AT 2 5 5 1 NORTH I H 35.

ITEM EIGHT IS A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE UNITED SOUTHWEST COMMUNITIES PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

22 NOTICES WERE MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET.

SIX TURNED IN FAVOR, ONE IN OPPOSITION AND THE GOVERNMENT HILL ALLIANCE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT.

THE APPLICANT SEEKS AN AMENDMENT IN ORDER TO REZONE TO NC.

THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIRED NC.

HOWEVER, IF AMENDED INTRODUCES THE ENCROACHMENT OF COMMERCIAL USES INTO PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BLOCK AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREA.

STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL AND THE REPRESENTATIVE IS PRESENT.

WILL THE APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE PLEASE ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? GOOD AFTERNOON.

THANK YOU ALL.

THIS HAS CONTINUED FROM TWO WEEKS AGO.

MY NAME IS MATT BATTERS.

I'M REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO'S ALSO THE APPLICANT,

[00:05:01]

UM, LOZANO HOMES, L L C.

LITTLE BIT OF AN UNUSUAL CASE.

SO I'LL, I'LL GO OVER WHAT WE DISCUSSED LAST TIME.

JUST FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WEREN'T HERE, WE'RE NOT SEEKING TO TEAR ANYTHING DOWN.

WE'RE NOT SEEKING TO PUT ANYTHING UP.

WE'RE SEEKING A CHANGE OF USE.

MY CLIENT IS IN THE BUSINESS OF RESTORING HISTORIC HOMES AND THAT'S WHAT WAS DONE HERE.

BUT WE DON'T LIKE THE F WORD FLIP.

UM, WE LIKE THE R WORD RESTORE, UH, AND AS IS CUSTOMARY FOR OLD HOMES, YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GETTING INTO WHEN YOU START TEARING INTO WALLS.

AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED HERE.

UH, THE, THE ESTIMATED PROJECT WENT A LITTLE BIT OVER, UH, AND THE PROPERTY WAS RESTORED TO A HIGHER THAN ORIGINALLY PLANNED CONDITION.

LOOKING AT WHAT TO DO WITH IT NOW, UH, PROBABLY A HARD SELL FOR ANYONE TO WANNA RAISE THEIR FAMILY AT THE CORNER OF AN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY IN A MAJOR INTERSECTION.

SO MY CLIENT HAS HOPED HE CAN MOVE HIS OFFICE SPACE FROM SAN PEDRO INTO THIS PROPERTY AS A LIVING FUNCTIONING SHOWCASE OF THEIR WORK AND ALSO A REAL ESTATE, UH, SALES OFFICE OUT OF THE SAME FACILITY.

UH, AGAIN, THIS IS NOT THE TYPICAL SITUATION WHERE A DEVELOPER CONTINGENT ON A CONTRACT, MY CLIENT OWNS THE PROPERTY AND INTENDS TO USE IT, HAS ALREADY SPENT THE MONEY.

AND IT'S, IF WE CAN STICK ON THIS SLIDE OVER TO THE RIGHT IS WALTERS N 35.

SO THE, THE BLOCK THAT'S NEXT TO HIM IS RIPE FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO PART OF THE REASON WE'VE ENJOYED SUCH GOOD NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT IS TWOFOLD.

FIRST OF ALL, IF THERE'S ANY KIND OF MAJOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY TO THE RIGHT OF US BETWEEN WALTERS ROAD AND, AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY GOING FROM R SIX TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IS KIND OF A NICE TRANSITION BACK TO R SIX.

UH, SECONDARILY, GOVERNMENT HILL IN GENERAL HAS SEEN A MASSIVE INCREASE IN THEIR PROPERTY TAXES.

IT'S MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL.

A LOT OF FOLKS THAT HAVE LIVED THERE, A LOT OF OWNER OCCUPIED, AND THEY'RE KIND OF BEING UNFAIRLY TAXED WITH PROPERTIES LIKE MY CLIENTS THAT HAVE A LOT OF MONEY INVESTED IN THEM.

AS I MENTIONED, WHEN YOU, WHEN YOU GET A PERMIT APPLICATION, YOU HAVE TO PUT ON THERE HOW MUCH IS GONNA GET SPENT SO THAT THE TAX MAN KNOWS HOW MUCH MONEY WENT INTO THIS PROJECT.

AND SO THE NEIGHBORS AROUND THEM GET UNFAIRLY VALUED WITH, WITH INCREASES THAT A COUPLE OF 'EM CAN'T AFFORD, EVEN WITH THE 10% CAPS ON HOMESTEAD.

SO THE REASON WE'RE GOING FROM R SIX TO NC INSTEAD OF AS SOME OTHER PROPERTIES CONDITIONAL USE IS BECAUSE THE TAX MAN CANNOT USE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AS A COMPARABLE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL.

SO IT TOTALLY TAKES MY CLIENT OUT OF IT.

I THINK I MENTIONED AT THE LAST HEARING THEY SAW A PROPERTY TAX VALUE INCREASE OF 50% AND THAT WAS DESPITE OUR BEST EFFORTS.

I WANTED TO MENTION TOO, IN THIS AREA, WE'RE NOT ASKING YOU ALL TO APPROVE OF ANYTHING THAT HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE.

SO JUST ALONG THIS I 35 FRONTAGE CORRIDOR, HERE ARE A FEW PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN ZONED WITHIN THE LAST 10 YEARS FROM R SIX OR R FIVE TO COMMERCIAL.

AND AGAIN, WE'RE ASKING FOR THE LOWEST LEVEL OF COMMERCIAL USE.

NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 4 27 STAFFORD ZONED C 2 22 27 NORTH I 35, ZONED C 2 22 0 7 NORTH I 35 C TWO I D Z 2119 NORTH I 35 C 1 19 43 NORTH I 35 I D Z 1711 THROUGH 1703 C 2 9 0 1 MASON STREET, OH TWO SMALL OFFICE BUILDING, 1926 WALTERS, C 2 2 0 3 JIM STREET, C TWO I D Z, AND 2 20 10 NORTH WALTERS C TWO I D Z.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE PROPERTIES I JUST MENTIONED HAS AT LEAST ONE BOUNDARY LINE WITHIN AN R SIX PROPERTY.

SO WE'RE, WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR SOMETHING THAT'S TOTALLY UNHEARD OF BEFORE.

AND I THINK AT THE LAST HEARING IT WAS ASKED WHAT WOULD, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN SOMEDAY IF THIS GETS SOLD TO SOMEONE WHO DOES WANT TO DEVELOP IT.

THERE'S TWO THINGS I CAN MENTION THAT ADDRESS THAT.

AGAIN, WE'RE NOT ASKING C ONE, TWO OR THREE.

IT'S NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, THE LOWEST LEVEL.

SO IF, IF SOMEONE WANTED TO COME IN RUBBING THEIR HANDS, THINKING IT'S OWN COMMERCIAL, THEY WOULD SPEND MORE ON THE PROPERTY THAN THEY WOULD MAKE BY TEARING DOWN WHATEVER'S THERE.

UH, AGAIN, A LOT OF MONEY WENT INTO THE RESTORATION TO SEE THAT THIS WAS DONE RIGHT, BUT ALSO THIS IS A 0.15 ACRE LOT.

SO IF SOMEONE WAS GOING TO DO A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, TEAR DOWN WHAT'S THERE AND PUT SOMETHING UP, THEY COULD ONLY USE MAYBE ABOUT 5% OF THE SPACE OF THAT LOT BASED ON THE SETBACK LINES UNDER THE UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODES.

SO THE LOT SIZE AND THE ECONOMICS ARE SORT OF A BUILT-IN SAFEGUARD FOR THAT BY ITSELF, BUT ALSO MENTIONED THAT ANOTHER REASON THAT UNDERSCORES THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT FOR THIS IS PARKING IS TIGHT.

UH, A LOT OF THESE

[00:10:01]

OLDER HOMES HAVE SINGLE CAR DRIVEWAYS IF THEY HAVE A DRIVEWAY AT ALL.

SO THERE'S A LOT OF OFF STREET PARKING.

IF WE WERE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, WE COULD DO SOME OFF STREET PARKING, TWO OR THREE SPACES FOR HANDICAP ACCESS AND WHAT IS CURRENTLY THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY AND IT WOULD ALLEVIATE SOME OF THE ON-STREET PARKING QUESTIONS ARE WELCOME.

THIS TIME I'VE GOT THE APPLICANT, COUPLE OF FOLKS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD HERE.

I KNOW ROSE HILL FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

THERE SHE IS.

GOOD TO SEE YOU ROSE.

UM, WE'RE GONNA COME MENTION, ADD TO WHATEVER MIGHT BE ON YOUR MINDS FOR APPROVING THIS.

AND AGAIN, A LOT OF THIS INFORMATION WE DID NOT HAVE THE BENEFIT OF EXPLAINING TO THE ZONING COMMISSION, UH, WHEN WE WENT TO THAT HEARING ON NOVEMBER 5TH.

THANK YOU.

UM, NEXT WE'LL HAVE CITIZENS TO BE HEARD.

HAVE, UM, FIRST PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS ALICIA CASTLEMAN.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.

HI, MY NAME IS ALICIA CASTLEMAN.

UM, THE ADDRESS WHERE I AM EMPLOYED IS, UM, WITH THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE MOVED THERE.

SO IT'S 2 5 5 1 NORTH HIGHWAY 35 IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

UM, HAVING SPENT TIME IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD DURING THE RESTORATION OF THE HOME, WHICH WAS AN ABSOLUTE DISASTER AND AN EYESORE, UM, THERE WERE VAGRANTS LIVING IN THE HOME PRIOR TO THE RESTORATION.

SO THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE REALLY BROUGHT UP THE NEIGHBORHOOD, LIMITED SOME OF THE, YOU KNOW, CRIME AND VAGRANCY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, AND HE'S PUT A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF MONEY INTO THIS PROPERTY.

IT WOULD BE FANTASTIC IF IT COULD BE USED FOR OFFICE SPACE.

UM, IT'S A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY.

IT'S GOT TREMENDOUS VIEWS, BUT IT'S VERY LOUD, SO I DON'T THINK SOMEBODY WOULD CHOOSE IT AS A HOME.

UM, IT IS A BETTER REAL ESTATE SHOW PIECE AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

IT IS HIGHER THAN THE OTHER HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND I CAN SEE HOW PEOPLE WOULD REALLY WANT IT TO BE ZONED COMMERCIAL BECAUSE IT IS AFFECTING THEIR TAXES.

SO THAT WOULD BE A TREMENDOUS BENEFIT TO THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE THERE IS SUCH A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS PROPERTY AND THE CURRENT PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THE ISSUE OF THAT BOUNDARY WALTERS IS RIGHT THERE.

UM, IT'S A, IT'S A NOISY AND BUSY CORNER AND HAVING A, A HOUSE WHERE THERE ARE PEOPLE, UM, THERE DURING THE DAY WHERE A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS ARE NOT HOME DURING THE DAY.

UM, THAT WHERE THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO KEEP AN EYE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, WOULD BE NICE FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SO THAT THERE IS A BOUNDARY BETWEEN THAT COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL.

THAT'S ALL.

THANK YOU.

UH, NEXT TIME TO SPEAK IS GARY.

GARY.

OKAY.

AND THEN FINALLY ON NUMBER EIGHT WAS, UH, MS. ROSE HILL.

NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.

UH, ROSE HILL, A PRESIDENT OF GOVERNMENT HILL ALLIANCE, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 9 0 6 MASON.

UH, I'M HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

UH, FIRST I WANNA SAY, UH, HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO EVERYBODY AND EVERYBODY HERE TODAY.

UM, UM, AS WE LOOK INTO THIS PROJECT, UM, WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL COMMUNITY MEETINGS.

WE HAVE A PROCESS IN WHICH OUR NEIGHBOR ASSOCIATION GOES THROUGH.

WE TRY TO BE TRANSPARENT AND TRY TO OPEN AS, AS OPEN AS POSSIBLE WITH THE COMMUNITY.

UH, THEY HAVE COME TO OUR MEETING SEVERAL TIMES AND, UH, WE TOOK INITIAL VOTE AND THE COMMUNITY VOTED ON IT.

ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE SAID THAT WE WANTED THE DEVELOPER TO DO TO GO OUT AND TALK TO THE NEIGHBORS, MAKE SURE THERE'S OPEN LINE OF COMMUNICATION, MAKING SURE THAT THEY KNOW, UH, WHAT THE RIGHT AND THE LEFTHAND ARE DOING.

UH, THIS HOUSE, UH, HAS WAS ON THE DEMOLITION BLOCK.

IT WAS, UH, UGLY.

IT WAS, UH, THERE WAS, THERE WERE VA VAGRANTS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERS COMING OUT OF THAT HOUSE.

IT WAS, IT WAS A DISASTER.

UH, IT WAS A COMPLETE, UM, UH, UGLINESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND, UH, THESE PEOPLE CAME IN AND THEY RESTORED IT.

THEY RESTORED THE FLOORS.

UH, THEY DIDN'T TAKE OUT ANY WINDOWS.

THEY RESTORED IT BACK TO ITS THE, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS TO PRESERVE THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO THEREFORE AT THIS POINT, UH, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS, AND THE COMMUNITY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.

I DO WANT TO ALSO JUST, UH, PINPOINT THAT THERE IS A HOME, UH, 1923, UH, NORTH PAN AM, UH, EXPRESSWAY, WHICH IS IN THE, HIS THIS, THIS HOUSE IS NOT IN HISTORIC, THE ONE THAT I'M REFERRING TO IN 1923 IN NORTH I PANAM IH 35.

UM, IT WAS SAME THING.

DILAPIDATION

[00:15:01]

READY TO BE DEMOLISHED.

THEY CAME IN, THEY FIXED IT UP, BUT THEY USED IT AS RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.

AND IT DID GET APPROVED THROUGH, UH, THE PLANNING ZONING AND IT WENT TO CITY COUNCIL ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

AND THAT WAS IN THE HISTORIC, THE HISTORIC, UH, EMBRACED IT BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORS THAT, UH, REHABILITATED THIS HOME TURNED OUT TO BE PRETTY GOOD PARTNERS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANT.

WE WANT SOMEBODY THAT'S GONNA BE THERE FOR A WHILE, UH, THAT'S GONNA COMMIT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT'S GONNA WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND IS GONNA BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR.

SO THEREFORE, THAT'S WHERE WE STAND TODAY.

WE ARE IN SUPPORT IN AS WELL AS THE COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU.

UM, DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY FORM? DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY REBUTTALS OR FURTHER COMMENTS? I WANNA MAKE ONE COMMENT ABOUT THE WRITTEN OPPOSITION THAT WAS TURNED IN, THAT PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED LESS THAN A YEAR AGO.

FERNANDO, DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN HE ACQUIRED THAT? IT WAS LESS THAN A YEAR? YEAH, IT'S A HOUSE FLIPPER.

HE'S GONNA, IT'S NOT BEING USED AS A PRIMARY RESIDENCE.

IT'S A FLIP THE BAD WORD.

NOT A RESTORATION THE GOOD WORD.

UH, NO PERMITS HAVE BEEN PULLED FOR THAT PROJECT.

MY CLIENT HAS DID EVERY PERMIT NECESSARY OR PROPER FOR HIS PROJECT.

SO I GUESS THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE'RE ASKING YOU ALL TO REWARD GOOD BEHAVIOR, DON'T REWARD BAD BEHAVIOR.

AND, UH, AN OFFER WAS MADE TO MY CLIENT TO WITHDRAW HIS WRITTEN PROTEST IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY, WHICH I FRANKLY THINK SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

BUT PLEASE KNOW THAT, UH, AS YOU CONSIDER THE WEIGHT OF THE OPPOSITION FROM THE NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

NEXT WE GO TO COMMISSIONER'S QUESTIONS.

LET'S START WITH WHO DO WE HAVE ALL THE WAY ON THE LEFT? UH, COMMISSIONER JOY MCGEE.

OKAY.

SO, UM, THE, UM, SO THEY, TO THE APPLICANT, SO YOU'RE JUST WANTING TO OPEN A REAL ESTATE OFFICE.

IT TWO FUNCTIONS.

A REAL ESTATE OFFICE AND THEN A SHOWROOM FOR WHAT THEY DO ON THEIR RESTORATIVE WORK.

SO IT'S, IT'S NOT JUST BROKERS WITH SIGNS.

THEY DO CLOSE SOME TRANSACTIONS AND IT'S A THREE BEDROOM HOUSE.

SO THE THOUGHT WAS THE BEDROOMS WOULD BE THE OFFICE WHERE THE DESKS AND THE TRANSACTIONS OCCUR.

THE LIVING KITCHEN, DINING ROOM AREAS, THOSE ARE THE, LIKE I SAID, SHOWROOM FOR, YOU KNOW, THIS IS HOW WE RESTORE LONGLEAF PINE FLOORS.

THESE ARE YOUR STAIN OPTIONS.

THIS IS HOW WE CAN, YOU KNOW, USE DIFFERENT TILE OPTIONS IN THE BATHROOM.

THIS IS HOW WE CAN TAKE OLD CABINETS AND, YOU KNOW, JUST CUT 'EM OUT AND PUT GLASS IN TO MAKE 'EM MODERN AND THAT KIND OF THING.

WELL, WHAT ARE YOU PLANNED? UM, DAYS OF OPERATION AND HOURS? SURE.

FOR THE, FOR THE REAL ESTATE SHOWROOM PORTION OF IT, IT'S ORDINARY BUSINESS HOURS.

BUT FOR THE TRANSACTION SIDE, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES A DEAL CLOSES AT NINE O'CLOCK ON A TUESDAY BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T GET THEIR MONEY.

SOMETIMES IT CLOSES AT THREE O'CLOCK ON A SUNDAY.

AND SO WHEN WE LOOKED INTO THE SUITABILITY OF OUR SIX WITH CONDITIONAL USE, THAT WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THAT IT WASN'T SUITABLE IS BECAUSE IT RESTRICTS YOU TO BUSINESS HOURS FROM EIGHT TO FIVE.

AND AGAIN, THE, THE ORDINARY HOURS PEOPLE ARE THERE ARE EIGHT TO FIVE, BUT YOU KNOW, WHY PLACE A LIMIT ON HIM RIGHT NOW IF IT'S JUST RESIDENTIAL FOR YOU TO COME AND GO WHENEVER YOU WANT.

SO WE, WE WOULDN'T ASK FOR A CONDITIONAL USE 'CAUSE THAT WOULD IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW.

AND, UH, WHAT KIND OF, UM, UH, BUFFERING, UM, DO YOU PLAN ON, UM, USING FOR THE, YOUR EXISTING NEIGHBORS? OKAY, WELL YOU'LL, YOU'LL NOTICE FROM THE, THE TEXT BUBBLE IS KIND OF BLOCKING IT.

THERE'S AN UNDEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPABLE BECAUSE OF ITS SIZE WITHOUT A QUITE A BIT OF VARIANCE LOT BEHIND IT, SEPARATING IT FROM THE OTHER NEIGHBORS RIGHT THERE.

SO THAT BY ITSELF SEPARATES IT FROM THE LOT BEHIND US, WHICH HAS INDICATED THEIR APPROVAL, OH, THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE DOES NOT HAVE A, IT WOULD SERVE AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THIS ONE, WHICH IS AN OWNER OCCUPIED HOMESTEAD RESIDENCE.

AGAIN, THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS FLIP.

UM, THEY'RE NOT MAKING VERY FAST PROGRESS ON IT.

CODE COMPLIANCE MIGHT HAVE COME BY TO VISIT THEM.

AND THEN OF COURSE THIS IS EDGAR STREET.

SO IT'S, IT'S A NATURAL BARRIER BETWEEN WHAT ARE CURRENTLY ZONED R SIX RIGHT HERE.

I DON'T BELIEVE ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES ARE OCCUPIED.

AND THEN THIS IS 35.

SO IF THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOR, THE ONE WHERE THE OPPOSITION ISN'T, YOU'RE SAYING IT'S A POTENTIAL FLIP.

SO IF IT DOES END UP BEING RESIDENTIAL CITY, YOU HAVE ANY PLANS FOR A BUFFER THERE? SURE.

I THINK CURRENTLY WHAT IS THE TYPE OF FENCING ON THAT BOUNDARY LINE? JUST A JUST CHAIN LINK.

I

[00:20:02]

THINK WHAT WE RECOMMEND IS LANDSCAPING.

YOU CAN DO THOSE RED NIA TYPE BUSHES.

YOU CAN DO, I ALWAYS CALL 'EM CEMETERY TREES, THOSE LONG STRAIGHT TYPE THINGS.

THERE'S A WALL.

UM, IF YOU HAVE THE STREET VIEW, YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET A GLIMPSE OF WHAT'S THERE.

THERE'S ABOUT FIVE FEET PRESENTLY BETWEEN THIS AND THE ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE.

BUT THEN THIS STRUCTURE HAS, I BELIEVE, WAS THAT THE ORIGINAL GARAGE PASS THROUGH RIGHT THERE, FERNANDO? YES.

SO IT'S, IT'S ALTOGETHER YOU'VE GOT ABOUT 15 TO 20 FEET BETWEEN THE TWO STRUCTURES.

AND THEN WITHIN THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, I MEAN THE LIVING SPACE IS TOWARDS THE FRONT, THE BEDROOM SPACE, THAT WOULD BE THE OFFICES OR OVER HERE ON THE BACK.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE IF, IF THIS WAS TURNED INTO A, YOU KNOW, THREE OFF STREET PARKING SPACES TYPE CONCEPT, IT WOULD BE OFF OF EDGAR STREET AS FAR BASICALLY, AS FAR AS AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM THIS PROPERTY HERE.

THANK YOU.

UH, COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ, DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS? NO, NO QUESTION.

UM, SO I STATED AT THE LAST MEETING THAT I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT YOUR CLIENT HAS PUT INTO THIS AND THE, UH, EFFORTS THAT THEY'RE GOING THROUGH TO GET THIS APPROVED.

UM, LIKE, LIKE YOU SAID, TREATING, UH, GOING ABOUT IT THE RIGHT WAY AND BEING A GOOD CHARACTER.

UM, I DID HAVE A QUESTION.

IF, IF THIS DOES NOT GET APPROVED, DO THEY PLAN TO STILL HAVE JUST A HOME OPERATED BUSINESS? ARE THEY GOING TO MOVE INTO THE RESIDENCE? WHAT ARE THEIR PLANS? SHOULD THIS NOT HAPPEN? I MEANT I THINK YOU MENTIONED LAST TIME YOU WOULD WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I, I IN, I AM IN SUPPORT.

I MEAN, I, I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICANT, NOT STAFF DECISION, BY THE WAY.

APPRECIATE THAT.

WHEN YOU MEAN NOT APPROVED, DO YOU MEAN AT THIS HEARING OR AT CITY COUNCIL WHERE THE FINAL, IF, IF EITHER WAY, IF THE PLANS AS YOU HAVE ARE PROPOSING THEM NOW, DO NOT MOVE FORWARD AND SURE.

THE, THE RE DESIGNATION AND REZONING DOES NOT MOVE FORWARD.

MIGHT TRY LISTING IT FOR SALE AND HOPING THAT NOW THAT THE FED HAS LOWERED INTEREST RATES, YOU CAN GET THAT PRICE POINT THAT YOU NEED.

BUT AGAIN, THERE'S RUMORS OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY COMING FROM OVER TO THE RIGHT.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE RENT RATES IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, RENTING IT OUT AS A RESIDENCE JUST WON'T MAKE SENSE.

UM, CAN'T, I CAN'T DIVULGE ALL OF MY CLIENTS.

THAT'S OKAY.

I'M JUST CURIOUS SECRETS.

BUT WE'RE RIGHT NOW FOCUSED ON THIS APPLICATION PROCESS AND CROSSING OUR FINGERS AND HOPE, HOLDING OUR BREATH.

OKAY.

THANK YOU CHAIR.

IF I COULD, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY A COUPLE OF THINGS RELATED TO THE BUFFER AND WHAT'S, WHAT THE CODE REQUIRES.

IF PROPERTY IS ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL, A SOLID SCREEN FENCE IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL USES.

A 15 FOOT BUFFER YARD IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO OUR SIX ZONING.

UH, SO IF THE STRUCTURES ALREADY EXISTING, UM, AND IT IS, AND IT IS WITHIN THAT 15 FOOT BUFFER YARD ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED R SIX, THEN UH, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCES WOULD BE NEEDED.

THANK YOU.

GO AHEAD.

UM, OKAY, SO ONE WAS ABOUT HISTORIC, BUT, SO THIS IS NOT A HISTORIC PROPERTY, SO I, MY WHAT YOUR CLIENT IS PROPOSING IS SOUNDS FINE.

MY WORRY IS ALWAYS WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY DO DECIDE TO SELL AND WE'VE REZONED IT AND NOW IT'S COMMERCIAL, WHICH OBVIOUSLY YOU CAN'T CONTROL AND I KNOW YOU DON'T INTEND TO SELL.

UM, MY QUESTION IS, UM, THIS MAY BE OVERKILL, BUT IF IT WAS DECLARED HISTORIC LANDMARK, UM, SO THAT A FUTURE OWNER COULD NOT TEAR IT DOWN AND DO SOMETHING ELSE, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER? I MEAN LOT IF THEY WANTED TO DO A HIGHER THAN NC DEVELOPMENT, THEY'D NEED TO PIECE TOGETHER A COUPLE OF THOSE LOTS, WHICH WOULD BRING 'EM BACK HERE BEFORE, BEFORE YOU ALL ANYWAY.

THANK YOU.

UH, I, I GET THAT, THAT MAKES SENSE.

UM, TO CLARIFY, SO IT LOOKS LIKE THE LOT ACROSS THE STREET ON THE OTHER SIDE OF EDGAR, THAT'S, THAT'S A COMPLETELY VACANT LOT.

THERE'S NO STRUCTURES ON THAT, IS THAT CORRECT? LET ME USE MY LASER POINTER.

OKAY.

YOU SEEING THAT RIGHT? THIS ONE RIGHT HERE? YEAH.

I KNOW THAT I'M SEEING A ROOFTOP, BUT I KNOW THAT OUR MAPS AREN'T ALWAYS UP TO DATE AND THAT SOME OF THESE STRUCTURES IS IS THIS WHERE THE HOUSE STILL IS OR IS IT, IS IT THIS ONE? IS IT THIS LOT OR THIS LOT FROM, FROM THE STREET MAP IT LOOKS PRETTY VACANT.

SO SO RIGHT NOW SOMETHING CAN BE BUILT THERE AND I, I CAN'T SEE THAT.

IS THAT, SO THAT'S CD AS WELL, THAT CORNER LOT RIGHT HERE? YEAH.

UH, NO, JUST BEHIND IT.

THIS IS, UH, R SIX CD? YES, MA'AM.

OKAY.

OKAY, THANKS.

I JUST WANNA CLARIFY 'CAUSE I CAN'T, AND THE, THESE ARE ALL OWNED IN SOME FORM OR FASHION, UH, BY THE TRUST DEPARTMENT AT FROST BANK.

OKAY.

UH, THE, THE BENEFICIARY IN THE NICE WOMAN THAT

[00:25:01]

SET THEM UP WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER NAMED CLMA JACKSON.

I, I DO NOT KNOW HER AGE, BUT SHE IS NOT MY AGE.

, I'LL SAY THAT KINDLY.

UM, THIS IS OWNED, THESE, THESE STRUCTURES ARE STILL HERE AND THEY ARE RESIDENTIAL OCCUPIED.

UM, AND I THINK, I THINK THOSE HAVE BEEN TURNED IN.

THANK YOU.

MY NEXT QUESTION IS ACTUALLY FOR STAFF.

AND I KNOW I, WE PROBABLY ASKED THIS BEFORE, BUT REMIND ME THAT WITH THIS CHANGE, WHAT OTHER USES ARE ALLOWED WITH, WITH THIS CHANGE? UM, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL COULD ALLOW FOR A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT, A FURNITURE REPAIR, UPHOLSTERING LAUNDRY, AND DRY CLEANING, UH, COPY SERVICE, A DRUG STORE, MEDICAL OFFICE OR MEDICAL CLINIC FOR PHYSICAL THERAPIST, UH, PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AND OR A DRUGSTORE.

AND, AND ALL OF THOSE USES WOULD NOT REQUIRE COMING BEFORE A HEARING OF ANY SORT? NO, THEY BY RIGHT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I I DO ACTUALLY, I, I'VE HESITATED A LOT ABOUT THIS BECAUSE I, UM, LIVING IN A, A NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THESE ISSUES COME UP.

UM, THERE'S A LOT OF CONCERN FROM NEIGHBORS.

UM, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE GIVEN THAT LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED USES, UM, I WOULD SUPPORT THE APPLICANT RATHER THAN STAFF'S DECISION UNLESS SOMEBODY CAN CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE.

.

UM, SO ON THIS ONE ZONING COMMISSION THAT THEIR LAST MEETING RECOMMENDED A DENIAL WITH AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION OF R SIX, CORRECT? CORRECT.

AND THEN FOR THIS MEETING, OR FOR THIS CASE, STAFF HAS ALSO RECOMMENDED DENIAL AND THEY ARE RECOMMENDING A CONDITIONAL USE OF OFFICE FOR THIS ITEM.

SO THE, UM, THE ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED, UH, DENIAL WITH AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION OF R SIX CD.

THE CONDITIONAL USE WOULD BE FOR A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND THEY'VE, THE, THE REASON FOR CD IS TO ALLOW FOR THE ZONING COMMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL OR TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AND PUT ADDITIONAL, UH, RESTRICTIONS IF NEEDED.

AND IN THIS CASE, THEY DID RECOMMEND MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, EIGHT TO 5:00 PM UM, AND A SOLID SCREEN FENCE, UH, I BELIEVE FOR ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY USES.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

SO THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH, WITH THE ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION OF, UH, A CONDITIONAL USE FOR OFFICE ON THE ITEM WE'RE CONSIDERING HERE TODAY.

SO WHY, WHY NONE OF THAT WOULD REQUIRE THIS PLAN AMENDMENT.

SO WHY DOESN'T YOUR CLIENT WANT TO GO DOWN THAT PATH? AGAIN? IT, IT WOULD PUT ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON MY CLIENT THAT HE DOESN'T CURRENTLY HAVE, AS WAS MENTIONED, THE EIGHT TO FIVE WINDOW.

SOMETIMES YOU DO DEALS OUTSIDE OF THAT, SO MIGHT AS WELL JUST LEAVE IT AS A HOME OFFICE FOR THAT PURPOSE.

AS, AS FAR AS A FENCE, DO YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEM PUTTING UP A SOLID FENCE? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

I'M HERE TO WORK WITH YOU GUYS THERE.

HE NEEDS TO GO UP TO THE MIC OR PLEASE REPEAT WHAT HE'S SAYING OR, OKAY.

UM, I'M NOT OPPOSED TO PUTTING UP A FENCE OR ANY TYPE OF BARRIER.

I'VE BEEN DOING EVERYTHING WHAT I THOUGHT IT WAS RIGHT IN THE CHAIN OF COMMAND.

AND SO, UM, BUT TO BE ABLE TO WORK FROM EIGHT TO FIVE, I'M, I'M SURE MOST OF YOU, UH, IF YOU EVER HAVE TO GO LOOK AT A HOME, YOU HAVE TO DO IT OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS HOURS.

UM, I WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO BE WITH MY FAMILY, YOU KNOW, IN THE EVENINGS AND WEEKENDS, BUT IT'S NOT REALISTIC.

UM, IT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK THAT WAY.

LIKE YOU SAID, A LOT OF THE CLIENTS TOO ON THE RESTORATION PART, WHEN THEY WANT TO COME PICK OUT THEIR WALL TEXTURE OR PICK OUT THEIR LIGHT FIXTURES, AGAIN, THE, THE SHOWROOM ASPECT OF HOW THE PROPERTY IS USED, A LOT OF THEM ARE WORKING PEOPLE THAT CAN'T COME TO THE SHOWROOM AND, AND GO THROUGH ALL THAT UNTIL THEY'RE OUTSIDE OF WORK OR THEY'RE THERE WITH THEIR SPOUSE AND IT'S SIX O'CLOCK OR, YOU KNOW, AFTERNOON ON A SATURDAY.

SO THAT'S WHY WE, WE WANNA AVOID THE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, BUT ALSO, AGAIN, BEING ABLE TO PROCURE THE APPROVAL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY WERE THE ONES THAT BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION.

IT ITS EFFECT ON BEING A NC COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, WHICH THEN WOULDN'T HIT THEM SO HARD ON THEIR PROPERTY TAXES.

SO IF IT WAS R SIX WITH CONDITIONAL USE, IT'S STILL RESIDENTIAL AND B AD STILL GETS TO MAKE ALL THESE HOMEOWNERS OVER HERE ON THE LEFT PAY MORE MONEY, MONEY.

THE ZONING COMMISSION ACTUALLY PUT THE, THE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON WITH THE HOURS.

THAT'S, THAT'S ACTUALLY ON THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO COUNSEL.

YES SIR.

IT IS.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

A FEW

[00:30:01]

QUESTIONS.

FIRST, UM, I ECHO THE COMMENTS OF COMMISSIONER, UH, CARDILLO.

THANK YOU, FERNANDO, THANK YOU.

UM, TO THANK YOU FOR TAKING ON THE PROCESS AND THE COMMUNICATION LIKE Y'ALL HAVE, UH, MUCH APPRECIATED.

I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE CAN LEARN FROM YOU ALL FROM, FROM WHAT WE SEE HERE.

UM, AND SO THANK YOU AGAIN FOR DOING THAT.

I KNOW IT'S NOT EASY, I KNOW IT'S A LOT OF TIME.

I'M GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND, BUT IT'S IMPORTANT.

UM, FIRST QUESTION I, UH, IS FOR IS FOR ROSE.

AND SO I JUST WANNA BE SURE, I KNOW Y'ALL ARE IN SUPPORT OF IT, BUT IF WE DO, UM, GO AHEAD AND, AND GO DOWN THIS ROUTE, AND THEY DO SELL, UM, THEY READ OFF THE ENTIRE LIST, LAUNDROMAT, THINGS LIKE THAT, IF THAT WERE TO HAPPEN, WOULD YOUR SUPPORT CHANGE? UM, IT, IT WOULDN'T CHANGE SO MUCH AS, AS THE FACT THAT I WANTED TO BRING SOMETHING VERY, VERY IMPORTANT UP THAT LOTS, AND THIS IS PROBABLY GONNA BE COMING YOUR WAY, SO I'M GONNA LET YOU KNOW THAT LOT RIGHT THERE THAT THIS GENTLEMAN WAS SAYING THAT, UH, THAT'S, UH, THE, THE, OH, I USE THIS.

OH, WOW.

RED, OH, OKAY.

THE AREA, ALL THIS AREA RIGHT HERE THAT HE SAYS BY FOR US IS UNDER CONTRACT.

ALL THAT'S UNDER CONTRACT.

I DON'T KNOW IF Y'ALL HAVE HEARD OR NOT, BUT THERE'S A BIG PROJECT COMING IN.

THERE'S BEEN A SIGNED CONTRACT THAT WE FOUND OUT IT'S GONNA BE QT GAS STATIONS COMING IN.

ALL THE HOMES HERE HAVE ALREADY BEEN, UM, THAT ALL THAT AREA'S GONNA BE DEVELOPED.

IT'S GONNA BE ALL COMMERCIAL.

UH, IT'S GONNA GO FROM HERE ALL THE WAY BACK UP UNTIL HERE.

SO ALL THIS IS GONNA BE COMMERCIAL.

AND AS FAR AS I KNOW, THE, THESE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MEETING WITH THE COMMUNITY, UM, THEY HAVEN'T, THEY'VE GONE TO ONE OR TWO OF OUR MEETINGS, BUT, UH, IT'S STILL NOT FINALIZED WHAT THEY'RE GONNA BE DOING WITH THE HOUSES.

WE DON'T WANT THE HOUSES TO BE KNOCKED DOWN, BUT WE'RE GONNA SEE WHAT THEY'RE GONNA DO.

BUT RIGHT NOW, ULTI, ULTIMATELY ALL THIS RIGHT HERE IS GONNA BE COMMERCIAL AND THE MAJORITY OF THOSE OF THESE IS, IS, IS ALL VACANT RIGHT NOW.

SO THAT'S GONNA BE COM IT'S COMMERCIAL, IT'S IT, YOU KNOW.

SO, UM, THIS HOUSE, IF YOU COME DOWN, I GUESS MAYBE, UH, FURTHER DOWN THERE'S THREE MORE BUSINESSES DOWN.

THERE'S A TAX SERVICE.

UM, THERE'S ANOTHER, THERE'S TWO OR THREE, THERE'S A PAINTING BUSINESS AND THERE'S ANOTHER BUSINESS BEFORE YOU GET TO THE END OF THE STREET WHERE PERSHING'S AT.

SO THERE'S PROBABLY ABOUT THREE OR FOUR BUSINESSES ALREADY ON THAT STREET.

ONE OF THE REASONS THAT WE SO SUPPORT SUPPORTED IS BECAUSE IT'S ONE BLOCK FROM WALTERS.

IT'S NOT LIKE IN THE HEART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT'S RIGHT THERE, ALMOST LIKE AT THE, AND THAT HAS BEEN VACANT.

THIS HAS BEEN VACANT FOR, I CAN'T REMEMBER FOR ABOUT 30 YEARS.

SO, UM, THE ONLY THING IS THAT, LIKE I SAID, WE PRETTY MUCH, UH, APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT WHEN PEOPLE COME IN TO WANNA MAKE A COMMITMENT TO THE COMMUNITY AND TO BE HONEST WITH US, AND BECAUSE WE'RE GONNA BE WATCHING ANY OF THESE PEOPLE THAT COME IN, UH, THAT SAY THEY'RE GONNA DO SOMETHING, THEY COME BACK AND NOT DO IT, WE'RE GONNA BE ON, ON 'EM LIKE A TON OF BRICKS BECAUSE I MEAN, I THINK THAT WHEN THERE'S A PARTNERSHIP AND WHEN THERE'S COMMUNICATION, UH, THERE'S GOTTA BE HONESTY AND THAT'S WHERE WE BASE OUR CASE.

THANK YOU.

CAN STAFF CONFIRM THAT WHOLE LOT THAT SHE MENTIONED WOULD BE COMMERCIAL? THERE IS CURRENTLY A ZONING REZONING CASE APPLICATION.

IT HAS NOT GONE BEFORE ZONING COMMISSION YET, AND OR THE PUBLIC PROCESS YET TO GIVE SOME, UH, POINT OF CONTEXT.

IT IS FRONTING WALTERS AND THAT IS, UM, A COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR.

SO, UM, IT'S, SO THE REAR OF IT WILL BE, UH, I GUESS ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY.

OKAY.

NO, I, AND THIS PROPERTY IS RIGHT OFF OF 35.

AND SO INITIALLY MY FIRST THOUGHT WOULD BE THAT THIS, THIS LAND USE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION.

UM, BUT AGAIN, I JUST WANTED TO BE SURE AND CLARIFY WITH ROSE THAT, UM, IF IN FACT THAT OTHER AREA GETS, UM, A NEW LAND USE AND REZONED THAT THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF FURTHER ENCROACHMENT.

IF THIS WERE TO, UH, IF WE WERE TO APPROVE THIS AND IF COUNSEL WERE TO APPROVE THIS, UM, ONE MORE QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT OR ACTUALLY FOR STAFF.

SO THE TIME ADJUSTMENT, UH, WOULD, WOULD ZONING OR CAN THAT ONE PIECE BE TAKEN OUT IF COUNSEL CAN MODIFY THE HOURS OF OPERATION DURING THEIR CONSIDERATION? SO RIGHT NOW, BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING COMMISSION ARE RECOMMENDING BODIES.

SO, UM, THERE ARE THREE TYPICAL CON CONDITIONS THAT ARE TIED WITH A RESIDENTIAL BASED ZONING DISTRICT THAT WHEN IT'S UTILIZED OR APPROVED FOR CONDITIONAL USE FOR A NON-RESIDENTIAL USE, IT'S HOURS OF OPERATIONS, UH, SUNDAY THROUGH SATURDAY, SEVEN TO SIX, UM, THAT THE EXTERIOR FEATURES, UH, NOT BE MODIFIED.

UH, SO IT STILL REMAINS RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE.

AND THE THIRD ONE WAS THE SIGN LIMITATION OF THREE SQUARE FEET.

BUT COUNCIL CAN MODIFY ANY OF THOSE CONDITIONS TO ALLOW A LARGER SIGN, UH, TO ALLOW MODIFIED HOURS OF OPERATION, UM, AND THEY CAN ADD MORE CONDITIONS

[00:35:01]

AS WELL.

SO MY QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT IS IF TIME WAS REMOVED FROM THAT, WOULD EVERYTHING ELSE LISTED WITH ITS CURRENT LAND USE BE APPROPRIATE? AND WOULD YOU ALL LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD? NO, AND THAT'S BECAUSE WE GAVE OUR WORD TO THE OWNER OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL.

AGAIN, THEY, THEY BROUGHT THE ISSUE UP THAT THIS WOULD HELP THEM WITH THE WAY THAT THEIR PROPERTY IS VALUED.

THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE FEELING THE PAIN AND THEIR WRITTEN SUPPORT WAS KIND OF CONDITIONED ON.

AND I, I'D FEEL LIKE THEY'D FEEL LIKE THEY GOT THE BAIT AND SWITCH PULLED ON 'EM IF WE WENT TO THAT AND SAID, WELL, WE GOT WHAT WE WANTED, BUT YOU DIDN'T GET WHAT YOU WANT.

BUT THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT ANYWAY.

SO I MEAN, WE, WE GAVE OUR WORD, WE WANNA HONOR IT TO THEM.

OKAY.

NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

UM, MY QUESTION IS FOR STAFF AT THE BIG PICTURE, IT LOOKS LIKE THE, THERE'LL BE A MASSIVE, UH, CHANGE ACROSS THE STREET AND WE'RE ARGUING ABOUT A SMALL PARCEL.

AND HOW SOON DO YOU EXPECT ACTION ON THE OTHER BIG PARCELS? UH, I BELIEVE THAT CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, WHICH MEANS IT DOESN'T GO FORWARD TO COUNCIL UNTIL JANUARY.

WOW.

SO OUR RECOMMENDATION ISN'T BASED ON SPECULATIVE, UH, ZONING.

IT'S BASED ON WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS AND WHAT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE SURROUNDING AREA.

OKAY.

'CAUSE I REALLY, UH, LIKE WHAT THEY DID, YOU KNOW, KEEPING THE RESTORATION TO COMPLY WITH THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I THINK THAT'S A, THAT'S A VERY GOOD THING.

BUT I'M, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE PARKING ISSUES.

YOU KNOW, ARE YOU GONNA PUT UP A WHOLE BUNCH OF NO PARKING SIGNS ALONG THE STREETS WITH REGARD TO PARKING? UM, FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IT'S BASED ON SQUARE FOOTAGE AND I BELIEVE IT'S ONE PER, I HAVE IT HERE, BUT, UH, PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL BASE IS ONE PER UM, UNIT.

BUT THEN WHEN, UM, IF, IF WE WERE TO GO FORWARD WITH AN R SIX CD, THE PARKING WOULD ALSO, UM, BE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN AND ON, ON PER B HAD THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE, THE HOME IS 1404 SQUARE FEET WHEN YOU TAKE THAT, UM, THE PARKING FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, ONE PER 300 SQUARE 300 SQUARE FEET.

SO 1404 DIVIDED BY 300 GIVES YOU, UM, 4.68 FOR A TOTAL OF FIVE SPACES FOR COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

PLUS I WOULD ASK THE APPLICANT HOW MUCH IS, HOW MANY, HOW, HOW MANY PEOPLE IN HIS STAFF WOULD THEY TAKE UP ALL THE PARKING STUFF.

I'LL TELL YOU, WE, THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT PLANS YOU COULD DO JUST FROM A PRACTICAL MATTER ON THE MAP.

YOU COULD DO THREE OFF STREET PARKING SPACES, WHICH WOULD BE A BIG CURB CUT.

AND THE PROBLEM IS A REALLY EXPENSIVE FENCE, UH, WASN'T EXPENSIVE TO BUILD, KIND OF CAME WITH THE PLACE.

IT WAS EXPENSIVE TO RESTORE IS RIGHT HERE.

SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF PAIN FELT WITH THE IDEA OF JUST THREE DIRECT OFF STREET SPACES THERE.

'CAUSE YOU'D CUT INTO THAT NICE BIG STUCCO FENCE.

THE OTHER IDEA IS A SINGLE DRIVEWAY IN, AND THEN SPACES THAT GO KIND OF NORTH TO SOUTH, YOU CAN FIT ABOUT THREE RIGHT THERE.

BUT I MEAN THERE, THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME, UM, PERVIOUS GROUND COVER I E GRASS FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.

THERE'S A SLIGHT DOWNHILL SLOPE THIS WAY.

AND IT, AGAIN, I'VE GOT A CLIENT THAT UNDERSTANDS DRAINAGE AND PIER AND BEAM FOUNDATIONS.

SO THIS PART OF THE PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE LANDSCAPING JUST FOR DRAINAGE AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE PROPERTY.

HE JUST SPENT A BUNCH OF MONEY FIXING UP.

BUT THAT MIGHT BE MUSIC TO, UH, MS. MCGEE'S EARS BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING A BIG FENCE AND BIG TREES AND RED NIAS ANYWAY ON THE LANDSCAPING.

SO PROBABLY ABOUT THREE OR FOUR SPOTS.

THERE ARE MY MEASUREMENTS TO, TO OFF.

YEAH.

SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO GET RID OF THE FENCE.

ANOTHER POINT SOMEONE SAID, SOMEONE ONCE SAID A PAGE OF HISTORY IS WORTH A VOLUME OF LOGIC ZONING, COMMISSION RECOMMEND DENIAL.

BUT THAT'S PARTIALLY MY FAULT BECAUSE I DOUBLE BOOKED THE AFTERNOON AND I SENT SOMEONE ELSE FROM MY OFFICE WHO HAD ABOUT 15 MINUTES TO STUDY THIS AND MAKE THE CASE TO THE ZONING BOARD.

AND THEY, THEY DID NOT HEAR ALL OF THE INFORMATION OR THE EXTENT OF THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TO YOU ALL ON THAT.

MAYBE THE OUTCOME WOULD'VE BEEN DIFFERENT IF THEY HAD.

THANK YOU.

THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS.

I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.

UM, WHEN I WAS JUST WONDERING WHO IF, IF STAFF OR IF THE APPLICANT KNOWS WHO OWNS THAT BUFFER PROPERTY BEHIND THIS

[00:40:01]

ONE? IN BETWEEN THIS ONE AND THE, UM, RIGHT HERE? YES.

OBJECT MARK, PLEASE APPROACH PODIUM.

SO THIS OWNER OWNS THIS PROPERTY ALSO.

OKAY.

SHE SAYS OKAY, SHE DID ONE, I'VE GOT A COPY OF ALL THE FORMS HERE.

I GUESS SHE DID ONE FORM FOR BOTH ADDRESSES.

IS THAT MS. MARTINEZ? YES, THAT'S CORRECT.

NO NUMBER OR IS THAT ARIAGA PEREZ, YEAH, MS. PEREZ.

OKAY.

HERE'S HER SUPPORT FORM RIGHT HERE.

I GUESS SHE JUST DID THE PROPERTY SHE OCCUPIES AND NOT BOTH PLATTED LOTS.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UH, I GOT A QUESTION FOR STAFF.

SO IF, IF THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST WAS GRANTED AND THEY WOULD HAVE, SO THEY WOULD, THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO THE FIVE PARKING SPOTS, IS THAT CORRECT? IT WOULD BE FIVE 4.6 H WOULD WE ROUND UP TO FIVE PARKING SPACES.

OKAY.

AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONFIGURE THEIR PROPERTY TO MAKE FIVE SPOTS HAPPEN.

UM, THERE'S NO SITE PLAN REQUIRED WHEN, IF IT'S GOING COMPLETELY TO, UM, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

OKAY.

BUT THAT WOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS.

OKAY.

AND AS A LOGISTICAL MATTER, THE OLD, UM, THIS SIDE WAS FOR A DRIVEWAY FROM THIS STREET.

I MEAN, THE HOUSE WAS BUILT IN THE TWENTIES BEFORE 35 EXISTED.

SO YOU COULD DO LIKE A TANDEM CONCEPT WITH ONE CAR HERE, ONE CAR HERE, AND THEN 1, 2, 3 TO LEAVE THIS OPEN IF THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT.

OH, SO THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR FIVE SPACES.

CODE DOES NOT ALLOW, UH, STACKED PARKING.

UH, SO IT, AGAIN, THE, YOUR PROPOSED PARKING PLAN, IF ZONED, DEPENDING UPON YOUR USE, UH, WOULD THEN BE REVIEWED AT THE PERMIT STAGE.

UH, THERE ARE WAYS IN WHICH TO, UM, ADDRESS IF YOU DON'T MEET THE MINIMUM OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, EITHER THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PARKING PLAN OR THROUGH A PARKING WAIVER WITH THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.

OKAY.

UM, MY QUESTIONS WERE PRETTY MUCH, UH, ASKED AND ANSWERED BY MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS.

SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DO ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I JUST WANNA THROW SOMETHING IN ABOUT THE PARKING.

WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE I TO, UM, RENT SPACE FROM THAT PROPERTY RIGHT BEHIND YOU TO ADD IN PARKING THROUGH THERE? IT WOULD HAVE TO BE ZONED FOR IT FIRST.

RIGHT.

AND THEN, UM, AND THEN WE WOULD REVIEW THAT BASED ON, UH, THE ZONING.

IT, IT SEEMS LIKE TRYING TO GET TWO MORE PARKING SPACES SHOULD NOT BE A DEAL BREAKER, I WOULD THINK.

AND MY ADVICE TO MY CLIENT WOULD BE TO SEE IF, IF WE HAD TO GET AN ADJUSTMENT FOR, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU CALL 'EM, BUT THEY'RE LIKE A GRID CONCRETE THING WHERE DRAINAGE CAN STILL GO THROUGH, BUT YOU CAN STILL PARK A CAR THERE AND IT'S SORT OF A LAWN CONCEPT.

THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE THE WAY TO COMPROMISE ON GETTING THE NUMBER OF SPOTS THERE WITHOUT PAVING THE WHOLE THING.

AND MY GUESS IS YOU'RE NOT GOING TO NEED THAT MUCH MORE SPACE FOR CARS BECAUSE I REAL ESTATE OFFICES DON'T TEND TO HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC COMING AND GOING AT ALL, ALL THE TIME.

RIGHT.

IT'S GONNA BE ONE OR TWO CLIENTS AT A TIME.

HE WANTS HIS AGENTS OUT SHOWING PROPERTIES FOR SALE, NOT HANGING AROUND THE OFFICE.

SO YOU'RE NOT GONNA, IT'S NOT LIKE A, A SHOP WHERE THERE'S GONNA BE PEOPLE COMING IN AND OUT ALL THE TIME, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY.

IT'S, IT'S A, LIKE ON THE RESTORATION SIDE, IT'S A APPOINTMENT ONLY.

THEY GO OVER, LIKE I SAID, WHAT COLORS YOU WANT, WHAT GRANITE COUNTERTOPS YOU WANT.

OKAY.

AND THAT KIND OF THING.

SO THERE'S NOT GONNA BE AN ONSLAUGHT OF, OF THE NEED FOR ON-STREET PARKING AND BLOCKING TRAFFIC AND ALL THAT SORT OF THING ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION.

THIS IS FOR STAFF.

DID WE EVER GET, UH, CLARIFICATION, UM, THE STREET NUMBER ON THE, THE STREET SAYS 25 39, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY 25 43 I 35 ON THE ACTUAL USE OF THAT PROPERTY.

I'M SORRY, WHAT, WHAT'S THE QUESTION RELATED TO THE ADDRESS SCENE? UH, SO LAST TIME WE WERE DISCUSSING WHETHER THAT WAS ACTUALLY A RESIDENCE OR A BUSINESS, UM, AT THAT, I GUESS IF YOU PULL UP THE GOOGLE MAPS, IT'S THE, IT'S THE HOUSE, UM, 25 43.

ON THE ZONING MAP, IT SAYS THAT IT'S R SIX, BUT, UM, IF YOU GOOGLE THE ADDRESS, NOT THE 25 43, BUT THE 25 39 POSTED ON, UM, THE FENCE THERE, IT SHOWS, UM, TOWING AND TAXES.

UM, I THINK WE WERE INVESTIGATING THAT TO SEE IF IT WAS A NON-CONFORMING USE OR IF IT WAS, UM, OPERATING,

[00:45:01]

UM, ILLEGALLY.

OKAY.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER FURTHER, UH, COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? THERE BEING NONE AT THIS POINT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I DON'T KNOW HOW TO WORD THIS RIGHT.

SO YOU HAVE TO HELP ME.

I WANT A MOTION TO SUPPORT THE APPLICANT AND AGAINST THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

SO IT'S JUST MOTION TO APPROVE.

MOTION TO APPROVE.

OKAY.

YES.

A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT APPLICANT'S REQUEST REQUEST.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER ROYAL EGR AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CARILLO.

CAN STAFF DO THE ROLL CALL VOTE.

COMMISSIONER AURORA EGRIN? YES.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO? YES.

COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

COMMISSIONER MCGEE? YES.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ? YES.

COMMISSIONER PECK? YES.

COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ? YES.

CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES.

MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU.

NEXT ITEM

[11. 19-8025 Public Hearing and consideration of a resolution recommending the approval of the proposed annexation of approximately 2,194.3 acres of land which are contiguous to the city limits and located within the City of San Antonio (City)'s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) in south Bexar County. Staff recommends Approval. (Clinton Eliason, Planning Coordinator, Planning Department, Clinton.Eliason@sanantonio.gov, 210-207-0268).]

IS ITEM NUMBER 11.

GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS.

UH, MY NAME IS CLINT ELIASON, UH, PLANNING COORDINATOR WITH THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO PLANNING DEPARTMENT, UH, PREVIOUSLY BRIEFED Y'ALL ON THIS, UH, THIS ITEM IS PROPOSING ANNEXATION OF NUMEROUS PROPERTIES TOTALING 2194.3 ACRES IN THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, E T J.

UH, HERE'S A MAP SHOWING ALL OF THE PROPERTIES.

THERE'S 11 TOTAL WITH, UH, ACTUALLY, EXCUSE ME, THERE'S 13 TOTAL WITH, UH, 11 OWNERS.

UH, PREVIOUSLY IN 2014 AND 2016, UH, THERE WAS FULL PURPOSE, EXCUSE ME, LIMITED PURPOSE IN 2014, AND THEN FULL PURPOSE ANNEXATION IN 2016.

AND PART OF THOSE, UH, ANNEXATIONS, UH, THE LAW, THE STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT WE OFFER, UH, AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.

UH, THESE ARE TWO PROPERTIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED AS AGRICULTURAL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OR TIMBER BY THE, UH, BEXAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

UM, SO THESE PROPERTIES WERE PREVIOUSLY OFFERED AGREEMENTS AND SIGNED, UH, AGREEMENTS.

HERE'S A LIST OF THE ALL OF THE AGREEMENTS, UH, AND FOR VARIOUS REASONS NOW THEY HAVE VIOLATED THOSE AGREEMENTS.

UH, YOU CAN SEE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE THERE'S A NEW, THERE'S NUMEROUS REASONS THAT THEY HAVE VIOLATED THEM, UH, ANYWHERE FROM A FIREWORK STAND ON THE PROPERTY TO THE PROPERTY BEING SUBDIVIDED.

UH, SOME OF THEM DO NOT ANY HAVE THE AGRICULTURAL DESIGNATION ANY LONGER.

UM, THE NOTIFICATION TIMELINE, UH, FOR WHEN WE SENT LETTERS.

WE PREVIOUSLY MAILED COURTESY LETTERS IN 2017 AND 2018, NOTIFYING THE OWNERS THAT THEY MAY BE, UH, IN VIOLATION OF THEIR AGREEMENTS.

AND THEN RECENTLY, UH, WE SENT CERTIFIED, UH, ANNEXATION LETTERS IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER NOTIFYING THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE ANNEXATION PROCESS OF THE PROPERTIES BECAUSE OF THOSE VIOLATIONS.

UH, PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, UH, INCLUDE TERMS FOR ANNEXATION BY THE CITY, UH, PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES THAT INCLUDE BASICALLY EVERY CITY SERVICE, UH, THAT, THAT PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY ALREADY RECEIVE.

POLICE, FIRE, UH, T C I RECYCLING STREETS, SIDEWALKS, UH, ANNEXATION SCHEDULE.

UH, TODAY, OBVIOUSLY PLANNING COMMISSION NEXT WEEK, ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 12TH WITH A FINAL EFFECTIVE DATE ON THE 31ST.

AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF 2194.3 ACRES AS CONSENTED TO BY THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS.

THANK YOU.

I DO WANNA ANNOUNCE THAT AT 2 48, UH, COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ LEFT THE ROOM, BUT SHE CAME BACK AT TWO 50.

UH, WE DO NOW HAVE, UM, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD, SO WE'LL DO IT.

LOOKS LIKE THERE'S THREE PEOPLE SIGNED

[00:50:01]

UP TO SPEAK ON NUMBER 11, AND THEY ALL KIND OF SIGNED UP AT THIS ON THE SAME LINE.

WAS THE INTENT TO, OKAY.

WAS THE INTENT TO GIVE, UH, ONE SPEAKER ALL THE, THE THREE MINUTES, NINE MINUTES? OKAY.

SO THE THREE PEOPLE SIGNED UP WAS EDWIN RIPS, WILLIAM RIPS, AND DARLENE RIPS.

SO DARLENE, IF YOU WOULD, UH, COME UP, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE, THE RECORD AND, UM, STAFF IF YOU CAN, UH, ADJUST THE TIME ACCORDINGLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE, UH, THE OTHER INDIVIDUALS ARE GIVING HER THEIR TIME.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

MY NAME IS DARLENE RIPS WHITLEY, AND THE PROPERTY WE ARE SPEAKING ABOUT IS AT 11,200 SOMERSET ROAD IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

UM, THE REASON I'M HERE TODAY, OF COURSE, IS UH, GENTLEMAN BEFORE HAD SPOKE ABOUT RIGHT NOW WE ARE IN A LIMITED PURPOSE ANNEXATION AND THE CITY IS SEEKING TO FULLY ANNEX US.

MA'AM, CAN YOU ADJUST YOUR MIC A LITTLE BIT? THANK YOU.

OKAY.

SORRY.

UM, AND THE REASON WE ARE IN VIOLATION AS WE UNDERSTAND IT, IS 'CAUSE OF A MR. W FIREWORKS STAND.

AND WHEN WE WERE MADE AWARE OF IT, WE HAD IT REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.

UH, WE CONTACTED OUR ATTORNEY, WHO UNFORTUNATELY IS NOT ABLE TO BE WITH US HERE TODAY, BUT HE HAD CONTACTED THE CITY ATTORNEY, MR. FRIEDLAND, AND, UM, INFORMED HIM THAT WE HAD THE, UH, MR. W FIREWORKS STAND REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.

JUST TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OUR FAMILY, UM, WE, UH, MY FAMILY OBTAINED THE PROPERTY ON OCTOBER THE FIRST, 1984.

THE SPECIFIC, UH, PROPERTY THAT'S IN VIOLATION, UH, MY GRANDPARENTS SETTLED IN THE AREA 'CAUSE WE OWNED SEVERAL FARMS IN THE AREA IN 1893.

UH, FAMILY STILL LIVES OUT THERE, AND WE DO FARM AND RANCH, THE PROPERTY, UM, ANYWAY, UM, SO IT, IT'S STRICTLY USED FOR FARMING AND RANCHING.

MY BROTHERS ARE HERE TODAY AND THEY ARE THE, THE PEOPLE, THE CARETAKERS OF THE PROPERTY.

UH, WE ARE AGAINST BEING ANNEXED AND WE'RE ASKING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AS THIS WOULD INCREASE OUR PROPERTY TAXES.

AND THE ONLY THING WE'RE DOING IS FARMING AND RANCHING THE PROPERTY.

UH, AND AGAIN, IT DOES AFFECT, UH, TWO ADDITIONAL FARMS WITH THIS PROPOSAL THAT THEY HAVE FOR ANNEXATION THAT OUR FAMILY HAS IN THE FAMILY, ONE OF THEM BEING THE, THE PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT MY GRANDPARENTS HAVE SINCE 1893.

SO WE PRAY THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER NOT ANNEXING US IN THE CITY.

OKAY.

THOSE WAS YOUR COMMENTS.

AND NO ONE LIVES JUST ONE OF THE THING.

NO ONE LIVES ON THE PROPERTY THAT IS IN WAS IN VIOLATION.

UM, IT'S, IT'S STRICTLY JUST A, IT'S A RANCH.

IT'S, UH, 1,269 ACRES THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF BEEF CATTLE ON AND DO SOME FARMING ALSO.

OKAY.

ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS? NO, SIR.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UM, NOW WE CAN GO ON TO COMMISSIONER'S QUESTIONS.

THIS TIME WE'LL START ON THE RIGHT WITH COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE, UH, THE RIPS.

YES.

YOU DARLENE.

SORRY.

SO YOU SAID THAT THE FIREWORKS STAND, THAT WAS THE VIOLATION, THAT YOU GUYS DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT OR WHAT? WE WERE NOT AWARE THAT IT WAS A, AN ISSUE? NO, WE DIDN'T.

AND WE GOT A CERTIFIED LETTER AND, UH, IMMEDIATELY WE CONTACTED OUR ATTORNEY AND WE REMOVED THE FIREWORK STAND.

AND SO YOU KNEW IT WAS THERE, BUT YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS A VIOLATION? DEFINITELY.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THAT WAS MY QUESTION.

WELL, I WOULD LIKE THE CITY TO ADDRESS THAT.

WAS IT, WAS THAT THE ONLY VIOLATION AND WAS IT REMOVED IN A TIMELY MANNER? AND IS THE, THE PUNITIVE NATURE OF THE CONTRACT THAT IF THERE IS A VIOLATION, THEY HAVE NO CHANCE TO ADDRESS IT? OR HOW, HOW DOES IT WORK EXACTLY? WHEN WE, UH, FIRST SENT THE LETTERS IN 2017 AND 2018, THE FIREWORK STANDS WERE ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL.

UH, AND THE, THE NEW LETTERS WENT TO THE SAME ADDRESS.

UM, WE OBVIOUSLY WENT AND, UH, DID FIELD VISITS AND SAW THAT THEY WERE THERE AND, UH, WE WERE

[00:55:01]

TOLD WE WERE CONTACTED BY THEIR, UH, ATTORNEY AND TOLD THAT THEY HAD REMOVED THEM.

UM, SO HOW MANY LETTERS WERE SENT AND WHAT'S THE TIMEFRAME OF WHEN THOSE LETTERS WERE SENT AND WHEN THE FIELD VISIT HAPPENED? UH, THE FIELD VISITS HAPPENED AHEAD OF TIME.

UH, IN PAST YEARS, WE DO NUMBERS OF THINGS TO, TO GO AND CHECK PROPERTIES, UH, RANGING FROM FIELD VISITS, CHECKING ONLINE, UH, WITH B AD, UH, CHECK IN WITH BEXAR COUNTY, UM, EXCUSE ME, BCA IS BEXAR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

WE CHECK WITH, UH, BEXAR COUNTY TO SEE IF THEY'VE PULLED, UH, UH, ANY BUILDING PERMITS OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE, AND THEN ACTUALLY GO OUT TO CHECK THE PROPERTIES AND, AND TAKE PICTURES, ET CETERA.

MY UNDERSTANDING FROM THIS SLIDE THAT JUST CAME UP, THAT'S ALL THE PROPERTIES IN CONSIDERATION OR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY? SO WHAT I, WHAT I'M ASKING IS DID THEY GET A LETTER, THEY REALIZE THEY'RE IN VIOLATION, THEY RESPONDED BY TAKING IT AWAY.

UM, OR DID THEY GET MULTIPLE LETTERS BEFORE THEY DID ANYTHING ABOUT IT? WHAT'S THE, THE TIMEFRAME OF WHEN THEY RECEIVED THE LETTER VERSUS WHEN THEY ACTUALLY TAKEN, TAKEN, THEY RECEIVED MULTIPLE LETTERS BEFORE THEY DID ANYTHING.

THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY OWNER DID.

OKAY.

ALONG THE SAME VEIN OF QUESTIONING FOR STAFF, SO THEY RECEIVED A LETTER AND THEY EVENTUALLY CORRECTED, UM, THEIR ERROR.

DOES THAT NOT THEN WITHDRAW STAFF'S ATTEMPTS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ANNEXATION OR, OR PURSUING THE, THE VIOLATION? DOES THAT NOT REMOVE THE PROPERTY? FROM LIST, FROM THE LIST OF, UM, VIOLATORS, UH, GOOD AFTERNOON.

BRIDGETT WHITE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AS WE HAD NOTIFIED THE PROPERTY OWNER A A NUMBER OF TIMES PRIOR TO THE CERTIFIED LETTER GOING OUT, UM, I ACTUALLY CHECKED AND IT WAS THE EXACT SAME ADDRESS, AND THEY ALSO WERE SENT A NUMBER OF OTHER, UH, LETTERS TO OTHER PROPERTIES THAT THEY OWN.

WE SPECIFICALLY SAID IN THOSE LETTERS THAT FIREWORKS WERE NOT ALLOWED.

UM, AS WE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS WITH THE CERTIFIED, UM, CERTIFIED LETTERS GOING OUT, UH, WE DID SPEAK WITH OUR ATTORNEY AND WHAT WE REALIZED THAT BECAUSE WE HAD SENT A NUMBER OF LETTERS SAYING, HEY, YOU CANNOT HAVE THIS PARTICULARLY USE ON YOUR PROPERTY.

WE'VE TOLD YOU ONCE, WE'VE TOLD YOU TWICE NOW IS THE THIRD TIME, WE HAVE NO GUARANTEE THAT THE FIREWORK STAND WILL NOT COME BACK.

SO THE AGREEMENT IS ACTUALLY BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE PROPERTY OWNER, THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY OWNERS IN, IN THE CASE, IN THIS CASE, MR. RIPS.

AND, AND THAT FAMILY SIGNED THE AGREEMENT.

IN THE AGREEMENT.

IT ACTUALLY STATES THAT YOU CANNOT HAVE THAT USE.

AND THOSE WERE ACTUALLY SIGNED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO.

UM, SO CAN WE GET THE CHART, UM, WITH THE PROPERTIES, UH, PLEASE.

AND, UM, MS. RIPS, UM, DO YOU MIND COMING TO THE STAND? YES.

SO DID YOU SAY YOU HAVE MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTED HERE? NO, WE DON'T HAVE MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTED ON THAT, UH, CHART.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT THE FAMILY OWNS MULTIPLE PROPERTIES IN THAT VICINITY.

UM, OKAY.

AND THE, AS FAR AS LETTERS, THE ONLY LETTER THAT WE HAVE RECORD OF IS THE ONE THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED AND TOOK ACTION UPON IMMEDIATELY.

WHAT DATE? WHAT'S THAT? UM, CAN YOU REPEAT PODIUM? YEAH, CAN, YEAH, CAN YOU REPEAT, UH, EITHER REPEAT WHAT HE, WHAT DATE HE GAVE OR JUST HAVE HIM COME UP PROCESS OF GETTING THE FIREWORKS STAND REMOVED? AS SOON AS WE GOT THE FIRST ONE, WE HAD OUR ATTORNEY, UH, CONTACT.

OKAY.

UH, CAN YOU USE THE MIC, SIR, PLEASE? HAD ATTORNEY ATTACKED, UH, UM, CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY, WHICH WE OBTAINED HIS NAME FROM THIS, UH, MR. AMY LYON.

WE TALKED TO HIM FIRST AND HE SAID HE SHOULD CONTACT HIM.

SO WE CONTACTED MR. FRIEDLAND.

OKAY.

AND THEN CAN YOU PLEASE, UM, F UH, ONE MORE TIME, JUST LET US KNOW, WHEN DID YOU GET THE LETTERS? OH, THE CERTIFIED LETTERS HERE YEAR, OCTOBER 25TH.

OKAY.

UM, CAN WE PUT THE, UH, TIMELINE UP PLEASE? OKAY.

SO ARE YOU SAYING THAT, UM, YOU DID NOT, UM, RECEIVE THE LETTER

[01:00:01]

IN DECEMBER OF 2017, IN JUNE OF 2018? NO.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, THANK YOU.

AND, UH, QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF PLEASE.

SO, C DO IS THERE AN INDIVIDUAL CASE FILE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY THAT YOU ALL HAVE WITH YOU RIGHT NOW? I'M SORRY, A INDIVIDUAL CASE FILE WITH THE DATES FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY WITH YOU TODAY? UH, NOT WITH ME, NO.

OKAY.

AND SO, SO WHEN THEIR ATTORNEY, UH, ATTORNEY CONTACTED YOU, SO YOU CONTACTED THE ATTORNEY BACK, WHAT DID THEY, I SAID, DID YOU, SO YOU, YOU HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH THE ATTORNEY? YES, YES MA'AM.

OKAY.

AND, UM, WHAT, WHAT, UM, SO THERE WAS NOT GONNA BE ANY TYPE OF, UH, CONCESSIONS MADE OR ANYTHING WITH THE ATTORNEY, UM, FOR, ON BEHALF OF THIS PARTICULAR, UH, FAMILY SINCE THEY WERE, UH, COMING INTO COMPLIANCE.

I MEAN, UH, IT WOULD BE EASIER IF WE HAD LIKE A TIMELINE.

I KNOW THAT YOU ALL ARE SAYING, BUT I'M JUST SAYING LIKE WHAT DATES THINGS WENT OUT, WHAT THE CONVERSATIONS WERE AND SO FORTH.

UM, SINCE WE'RE GONNA ANNEX THEM FORCIBLY, IT, IT'D BE NICER IF WE HAD MORE INFORMATION SINCE THEY'RE HERE CONTESTING THAT, UH, WHEN THEY RECEIVED THE FIRST LETTER, UH, WHICH I, THEY SAID OCTOBER 25TH, UH, THEY, THEY THEN DID, UH, THEIR ATTORNEY CALLED ME SHORTLY THEREAFTER AND, UH, ASKED ME ABOUT IT AND I SAID IF HE HAD ANY LEGAL QUESTIONS TO CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND, AND ERIC FREELAND, WHICH HE DID THAT MM-HMM.

.

AND SO, OKAY.

WELL, I I, I DON'T MIND, UM, APPROVING, UM, THIS IS NOT THANK YOU.

UM, I'M OKAY WITH, UM, WHAT THE CITY IS PRESENTING EXCEPT FOR THIS PARTICULAR, UH, CASE.

I, I DON'T THINK I WOULD BE IN SUPPORT OF A, A MOTION THAT, UM, INCLUDES THIS PROPERTY, IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN, GO AHEAD.

UH, GOOD AFTERNOON.

UM, COMMISSIONERS RUDY NINO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN, UH, COMMISSIONER MCGEE.

UM, ONE OF THE REASONS WHY, UH, WE TAKE THE, UH, ANNEXATION OR PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES, PARTICULARLY THOSE THAT HAVE FIREWORKS, UM, UH, AND WE'RE SO, UM, UH, WE HAVE SUCH AN EYE ON, ON THAT TYPE OF A USE WITHIN THE COUNTY IS BECAUSE, UH, OUR FIRE, WE COORDINATE VERY REGULARLY WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF FIREWORKS IN AND NEAR A PROPERTY.

THAT THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE PLACE THESE, THESE THAT TYPE OF LANGUAGE IN OUR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE, THE NATURE OF HAVING A FIREWORKS STAND NEAR THE CITY LIMITS AND THE FACT THAT IT IS A PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE.

UM, SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY WE, WE, WE CERTAINLY BRING THIS TO FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL, IS THE FACT THAT IT, IT DEFINITELY POSES A PUBLIC, UH, HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE.

UH, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN AWARE AND HAVE BEEN CONCERNED ABOUT THE NUMBER OF FIRE, UM, FIREWORK SALES THAT HAVE BEEN OCCURRING ON PROPERTIES WITH WHICH THE CITY HAS ENTERED INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH, UM, AND ARE ADJACENT TO OUR CITY LIMITS.

UH, SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT I, I, I BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION.

I'D LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER, UM, AS WE MOVE THIS FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL BECAUSE, UM, IT IS SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN A CONCERN FOR THE CITY FOR QUITE A WHILE, HENCE THE REASON WHY WE'VE SENT OUT, UH, NOTIFICATIONS IN 2017 AND, AND ALSO IN, IN 2018.

AND, AND WE THOUGHT THAT THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH CONSIDERATION FOR FOLKS TO HOPEFULLY, UH, NOT PLACE FIREWORK STANDS ON THEIR PROPERTY, PARTICULARLY SINCE THESE AGREEMENTS REALLY WERE SIGNED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO.

UM, SO WITH THAT, I I THANK YOU FOR YOUR, FOR YOUR ATTENTION.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION FOR MR. RIPS.

UM, SO IS THE FIRE STANDS, FIREWORK STANDS THAT WERE ON THOSE PROPERTIES? WERE THOSE YOU ALL'S PROPERTIES OR YOU LEASING YOUR PROPERTY OUT? NO, MY BROTHER'S FARM AND RANCH, THE PROPERTY AND JUST THOSE FIREWORK STANDS WERE ON OUR PROPERTY.

SO THEY'RE THEY'RE YOUR FIREWORK STANDS? OKAY.

WELL, THEY'RE NOT OUR FIREWORK STANDS.

THEY'RE MR. W'S FIREWORK STANDS.

BUT THEY'RE, YOU'RE LEASE THEY HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

MM-HMM.

? YES.

SO YOU LEASED IT OUT TO MR. W, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? WE DID LEASE THE PROPERTY OUT.

YOU DID LEASE IT? YES.

TO MR. W.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ANY FURTHER, COMMISSIONER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OH, I THINK THIS QUESTION WAS ALREADY ANSWERED AND IT WOULD BE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.

UM, ALL THREE LETTERS WERE MAILED TO THE SAME ADDRESS, IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

AND ON THAT NOTE, JUST BECAUSE A LOT OF DATES AND NUMBERS, SO ALL THREE WERE SENT OUT 17, 18, AND 19.

THE ONLY ONE THAT WAS RESPONDED TO WAS OCTOBER 18TH, 25TH OR SO, 2019, WHICH WAS ADDRESSED

[01:05:01]

IMMEDIATELY.

OKAY.

AND THE ONLY LAND RIGHT NOW THAT THE RIPS ARE SPEAKING TO IS IDENTIFIED AS NUMBER TWO ON THIS MAP, WHICH JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE THE LARGEST PARCEL OF LAND.

YES, MA'AM.

OKAY.

OKAY.

UM, SO WAS THIS QUESTION FIRST, JUST JUST FOR A CLARIFICATION, WAS THIS A CASE OF THERE WAS A FIREWORK STAND, THE GOT A NOTIFICATION, FIRE EXTEND GOES AWAY AND ANOTHER ONE POPS UP.

WAS THIS MULTIPLE INSTANCES OR WAS THIS MULTIPLE LETTERS FOR THE ORIGINAL? JUST MULTIPLE LETTERS AS FAR AS WE WERE AWARE, THEY HAD BEEN THERE THE ENTIRE TIME.

OKAY, OKAY.

FROM 2017 ON TO 2019.

OKAY.

WERE THE, DO YOU KNOW IF THEY WERE OPERATING? I MEAN, I THINK FIREWORK SALES ARE BASICALLY LIKE JULY 4TH AND NEW YEAR'S.

IT WAS A CASE WHERE IT'S LIKE, OKAY, IT'S OPERATING AGAIN.

IT'S OPERATING AGAIN.

GENERALLY THEY'RE THE STANDS STAY THERE YEAR ROUND.

YEAH.

AND THEN THEY OPEN UP, UH, NEW YEAR'S EVE, 4TH OF JULY, WHENEVER THEY'D LIKE TO SELL.

USUALLY A COUPLE WEEKS PRIOR, A WEEK AFTER.

UM, BUT MOST OF THE PROPERTIES THAT WE'VE GONE IN AND LOOKED AT, UH, THEY, THEY STAY THERE.

THE STANDS STAY THERE.

THEY MAY BE CLOSED, BUT THEN THEY, LIKE I SAID, THEY OPEN 'EM BACK UP SELLING SEASON.

OKAY.

SO, AND WITH THE, JUST THE MERE PRESENCE OF THAT STAND CAN BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION? CORRECT.

OKAY.

UH, SORRY, I, UH, A LITTLE BIT MORE TO THAT.

IT, BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THEY'RE LEASING THEIR PROPERTY OUT TO THE FIREWORKS COMPANIES, WHICH WAS STATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

OKAY.

WHICH WOULD BE STATED IN THE, THE INITIAL LETTER OR ONE OF THEIR INITIAL LETTERS WOULD BE SAYING, HEY, THIS IS A VIOLATION, AND THEN THEY HAVE A CHANCE TO CORRECT IT.

SO IF THEY WERE, LET'S, LET'S SAY IT WAS A, SOME, SOME HYPOTHETICAL PROPERTY.

THEY HAD THE FIRE STAND, THEY GOT THE LETTER, THEY TOOK IT OFF.

IS THAT KIND OF THE END OF THAT AND THEN, OR DID THAT MOST LIKELY WOULD'VE BEEN THE END OF IT? YES.

OKAY.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

QUESTION FOR MS RIPS.

WHAT ELSE IS ON, ON YOUR PIECE OF LAND? YOU SAID YOUR BROTHER IS, IS FARMING ON IT? WE HAVE, UH, YOU KNOW, PROBABLY LIKE 300 HEAD OF BEEF CATTLE AND THEN THEY DO, UH, FARMING HAY AND GRAIN, UH, YOU KNOW, TO FEED THE CATTLE AND THANK YOU.

AND THEN ONE MORE QUESTION FOR STAFF.

AND SO IF WE WERE TO REMOVE THIS PARCEL OF LAND, UM, FROM THIS ANNEXATION TODAY, UH, AND IT JUST SO HAPPENS IN THE NEAR FUTURE OR A FEW YEARS THAT THEY ADD THOSE FIREWORKS STAND, WE WOULD JUST GO THROUGH THIS EXACT SAME PROCESS AND WOULD HAVE THIS BACKUP AND CORRECT.

IT WOULD MAKE OUR DECISION A LITTLE EASIER IN THE FUTURE.

OKAY.

CORRECT.

THANK YOU.

UM, WOULD, WOULD THE ANNEXATION AFFECT ANY AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE AS FAR AS THEIR AWARE AGRICULTURAL MARKET VALUATION BY B A D? IT WILL NOT AFFECT THAT AT ALL.

THEY WILL JUST BE BROUGHT INTO THE CITY.

THEIR TAXES MAY FLUCTUATE A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE OF CITY TAXES ADDED ONTO IT, BUT WHATEVER TAX BREAKS THEY GET FROM THAT AGRICULTURAL MARKET VALUATION WILL STAY ON THE PROPERTY.

OKAY.

SO BEING IN THE CITY LIMITS THOUGH, THEY WERE AT THAT, BUT THERE, THERE ARE OTHER EXEMPTIONS OR VALUATIONS OR SOMETHING ARE PRETTY MUCH OKAY.

RIGHT.

ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? YES.

JUST A QUESTION.

WHO SIGNED THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT? WAS IT THE, THE CURRENT OWNERS? WAS IT AN I I IT SOUNDS LIKE THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT HAPPENED A LONG TIME AGO, SO I'M KIND OF CURIOUS HOW MUCH THE CURRENT OWNERS, MANAGERS, IT'S THE CURRENT OWNER.

IT IS.

OKAY.

THANK.

ONE MORE QUESTION.

SEPARATE FROM, FROM THIS PARTICULAR CASE, EVERY OTHER ONE ON THIS LIST.

SO THE OTHER 10 PEOPLE LISTED, UM, HAVE THEY OPPOSED OR WHAT'S THE, WHAT'S THE STATUS ON THAT? WE'VE RECEIVED CALLS, UH, ACTUALLY RELATING TO ONE OF THE OTHER PROPERTIES, UM, NUMBER, SORRY, , UH, NUMBER FIVE.

UH, WE RECEIVED CALLS FROM, UH, THE NEIGHBORS OF THAT ONE.

AND ACTUALLY THERE'S RESIDENTIAL ON BOTH SIDES OF IT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF IT.

AND, UH, EXCUSE ME, IT DOES NO LONGER HAVE THE AGRICULTURAL VALUATION, BUT, UH, THE, THE NEIGHBORS HAVE BEEN COMPLAINING THAT, UH, THE, THE CURRENT OWNER IS DOING DIFFERENT TYPES OF ILLEGAL DUMPING ON THE PROPERTY.

SO, UH, AND I DID LET THEM KNOW ABOUT THIS MEETING AS WELL, THAT THEY COULD COME AND, AND TALK ABOUT IT AS WELL IF THEY WOULD'VE LIKED.

BUT THAT WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT WE HEARD

[01:10:01]

ANYTHING ON.

THEY WOULD LIKE IT TO BE ANNEXED.

THE NEIGHBORS WOULD, UM, MR. RIZ WAS GONNA RESPOND TO MY QUESTION.

COULD YOU PLEASE, UH, REGARDING THE AGRICULTURE TAX? YES.

WE, WE ARE, WE DO RECEIVE THE AGRICULTURE TAX DISCOUNT.

HOWEVER, UH, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IS VALUED AT A A QUITE HIGH, HIGH VALUE, IT WOULD STILL INCREASE OUR TAXES BY PAYING CITY TAXES.

AND WE HAVE NO NEED FOR ANY, UH, SERVICES THAT THE CITY IS ABLE TO PROVIDE.

'CAUSE NO ONE LIVES THERE.

AGAIN, THE LAND IS JUST FARMED AND RANCHED, WE HAVE HAD THE FIREWORK STANDS REMOVED, BUT CAN YOU CLARIFY, WAS IT INDEED YOU AND YOUR BROTHERS WHO SIGNED THE AGREEMENT? MY BROTHER SIGNED THE AGREEMENT.

THANK YOU.

ANY FURTHER, COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PECK IN SUPPORT OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, UH, STAFF DO THE ROLL CALL.

COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

YES.

COMMISSIONER PECK? YES.

COMMISSIONER ROYAL EGRIN? NO.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO? NO.

COMMISSIONER MCGEE? NO.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ.

UH OH.

COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ.

NO.

CHAIRMAN.

CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES.

MOTION FAILS.

SO NOW WE NEED A MOTION TO RECONSIDER.

IS THAT CORRECT? MOTION TO RECONSIDER.

WE HAVE A MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ TO RECONSIDER.

WE HAVE A SECOND.

SECOND.

WE HAVE A SECOND.

UH, STAFF DO THE ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MISSION TO WE DON'T NEED A ROLL CALL VOTE.

YOU CAN DO ALL IN FAVOR.

AND IF WE DO A SENSE A NO VOTE, THEN WE WILL DO A ROLL CALL VOTE.

OKAY.

UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF RECONSIDERING THE QUESTIONS SAY AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? NAY.

ROLL CALL VOTE.

AY.

COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER.

AYE.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO? YES.

COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA.

YES.

COMMISSIONER ROYAL LAG GREENY? YES.

COMMISSIONER MCGEE? YES.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ? YES.

COMMISSIONER PECK.

NO COMMISSION.

OH, CHAR, SORRY.

CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER GARCIA.

YES.

MOTION PASSES.

MAKE A MOTION TO JUST EXCLUDE THE RIPS PARCEL OF 1200 ACRES.

I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU'D LIKE ME TO PHRASE THAT.

MOTION TO APPROVE, UH, THE, UM, ITEM EXCLUDING THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

OKAY.

MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 11.

UH, EXCLUDING THE 1200, UM, ACRES OWNED BY THE RIPS FAMILY.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM GONZALEZ AND A SECOND FROM WHO MAY THE SECOND? I DO.

OKAY.

ROHE, APPLICANT, DO THE ROLL CALL.

COMMISSIONER GONZALEZ? YES.

COMMISSIONER ROYAL LAG GREENY? YES.

COMMISSIONER MICHAEL GARCIA? YES.

COMMISSIONER CARILLO? YES.

COMMISSIONER MCGEE? YES.

COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ? YES.

COMMISSIONER PECK? NO.

CHAIRMAN.

CHRISTOPHER GARCIA? YES.

MOTION PASSES IT FOR ITEM NUMBER 11.

NEXT WE WILL HAVE, UM, MEETING MINUTES.

[13. 19-8703 Consideration and Action on the Minutes from November 13, 2019.]

ANY QUESTIONS OR CORRECTIONS ON THE MEETING MINUTES? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MEETING MINUTES, AS IS SAY AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED?

[Director’s Report: Status of Planning Commission Appointments.]

DO WE HAVE ANY DIRECTOR'S REPORT, STAFF'S REPORT, ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE? JUST A QUICK UPDATE.

I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THIS IN WORK SESSION.

UH, DECEMBER 12TH IS GOING TO BE THE SPECIAL GOVERNANCE, UH, COMMITTEE MEETING TO CONSIDER, UH, THE, UH, CANDIDATES PUT FORWARD FOR CONSIDERATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES, AS WELL AS THE TERMS THAT ARE, UM, EXPIRED.

UH, SO THAT'S DECEMBER 12TH AT TWO O'CLOCK, I BELIEVE.

AND, UH, THEN THE, THAT ACTION WILL MOVE FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY.

UH, SO THAT MEANS THAT WE HAVE, UH, ONE MEETING IN DECEMBER WHERE, UM, ATTENDANCE IS CRUCIAL.

AND THEN WE HAVE ONE MEETING IN, UH, JANUARY, JANUARY 8TH, UH, WHERE ATTENDANCE IS CRUCIAL,

[01:15:01]

UH, BEFORE THE NEW SLATE IS CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL.

SO IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THE NEXT TWO MEETINGS, THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL.

WHAT IS THE DATE FOR THE DECEMBER CRUCIAL MEETING? I THINK IT'S DECEMBER 11TH.

DECEMBER 11TH? YEP.

SO EVERYBODY MAKES SURE THEY'RE GONNA BE HERE.

IF NOT, LET STAFF KNOW RIGHT AWAY SO THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY GOTTA DO, WHICH MEANS THE JANUARY MEETING WILL BE VERY LONG.

BUT ANYWAY.

OKAY.

THAT'S IT.

YEAH, THAT'S IT.

ANYTHING ELSE? IF NOT, HAPPY THANKSGIVING.

AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.

WE'RE GONNA BREAK SOMETHING.