[00:00:01]
OKAY, IT IS 2 11, 2 12, AND WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE WEDNESDAY, MAY 13TH, 2026.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER.
WOULD STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL? COMMISSIONER SCHWAN.
COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ? PRESENT.
CAN WE HAVE THE SPANISH ENGLISH INTERPRETER PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON.
TODAY WE'RE GONNA HAVE TWO AGENDAS.
WE HAVE THE, UH, UM, CONSENT AGENDA.
CASES ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CASES WHERE THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOESN'T REQUIRE FURTHER DETAILED DISCUSSION.
NOBODY IN THE AUDIENCE IS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THOSE ITEMS WILL BE HEARD IN ONE MOTION.
UM, THE NEXT AGENDA IS THE INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA.
ANYTHING ON INDIVIDUAL HEARING AGENDA WILL BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE COMMISSION.
WHAT I HAVE RIGHT NOW, FIRST OF ALL, IS, UH, ITEMS 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, AND 18 ARE ALL ON INDIVIDUAL? THAT IS CORRECT.
EVERYTHING ELSE IS ON CONSENT EXCEPT FOR ITEMS 2021 AND 22.
SO BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE CONSENT AGENDA AGENDA, I'M
[Other Items ]
GONNA TURN THE MEETING OVER TO, UH, NIKKI SALINAS TO HANDLE OFFICER ELECTIONS.GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS.
UH, SO FIRST UP FOR BUSINESS, UH, WE ARE GOING TO, UM, DO OUR ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR THE YEAR.
I'M GONNA START WITH NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR, AND THEN WE'LL DO, UH, A VOTE ON THAT.
WE'LL DO NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR, AND THEN WE'LL DO NOMINATIONS FOR PRO TIM.
SO WE'LL DO A MOTION AFTER EACH ONE OF THOSE.
SO I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR.
I NOMINATE GEORGE PECK PER CHAIR.
UH, ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR? HEARING NONE.
ANY OPPOSED? CONGRATULATIONS, GEORGE.
I'M NOW GONNA OPEN NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR.
I WILL NOMINATE MATT PROFIT AND I'LL SECOND.
ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? HEARING NONE.
ANY OPPOSED? AND LASTLY ARE NOMINATIONS FOR PRO TE NOMINATE, UH, MEREDITH SIEGEL.
ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? HEARING NONE.
DO I HAVE THE MEETING BACK? ARE YOU GIVING ME CONTROL OF THE MEETING BACK? THANK YOU.
WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM 21, WHICH IS THE SELECTION OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE.
UM, FOR THE PC T APPLICANTS, THE, THIS, WHOEVER ENDS UP ON THIS COMMITTEE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE APPLICANTS TO THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THOSE APPOINTMENTS.
BELIEVE THAT APPLICATIONS ARE OPEN FOR THAT.
AND DEADLINE IS, WHAT IS IT, JUNE 8TH OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
SO THAT'LL BE SOMETIME IN LATE JUNE, EARLY JULY BY THE TIME IT COMES TO THIS COMMISSION? THAT'S CORRECT.
SO CAN YOU NOMINATE, UH, I'M GONNA NOMINATE MYSELF.
I'LL NOMINATE COMMISSIONER WALLER STEP.
SO WE NEED ONE MORE FOR AN ALTERNATE FOR THE PTA NOMINATING COMMITTEE
[00:05:01]
ALTERNATIVE, I NOMINATE MYSELF.SO WE HAVE PECK SANCHEZ, AND WALLER STAT AS PRIMARY, AND WE HAVE DA SUKI AS ALTERNATE FOR THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE.
UM, IS, DOES THAT NEED TO BE A MOTION OR WAS THAT JUST OKAY.
YEAH, A MOTION, UH, MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED.
UH, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
UM, SO, UH, COMMISSIONER ETTE WHO WAS UH, NO LONGER ON PLANNING COMMISSION WAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATE TO THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
UM, SINCE HE'S NO LONGER ON PLANNING COMMISSION, WE WILL NEED TO, UH, RE REAPPOINT SOMEONE TO TAKE HIS SPOT OR APPOINT SOMEONE TO TAKE HIS SPOT.
SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE WILL TAKE EITHER A VOLUNTEER OR A NOMINATION YOU CAN SELF NOMINATE FOR, UH, THE ALTERNATE PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATION ON THE TECH.
I NOMINATE COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ.
OH, I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE A, WAS THAT A MOTION? I SANCHEZ IS MAKE, I BELIEVE SANCHEZ IS ALREADY A PRIMARY MEMBER.
I WAS GONNA SAY, I BELIEVE HE'S A PRIMARY MEMBER.
SO CURRENTLY
HE'S ALREADY, HE'S ALREADY STUCK FOR UDC.
YOU NEED ANOTHER VOLUNTOLD? I'LL VOLUNTEER.
AND YOU'RE GOING TO REALLY ENJOY IT.
[Plats ]
GOING TO MOVE ON WITH THE IRREGULAR AGENDA.SO WE'LL START WITH THE CONSENT AGENDA, AND I'M GOING TO ASK, HE LEFT.
IT IS TWO 19 AND COMMISSIONER BUSANTE HAS LEFT THE MEETING FOR PURPOSES OF RECUSING FROM ITEMS ONE AND FIVE AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
WE'LL, IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, I MOVE TO APPRO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE AMENDED MINUTES.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT WITH THE AMENDED MINUTES FROM COMMISSIONER PROFIT AND A SECOND WITH BY COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL.
[Comprehensive Master Plan Amendments ]
WE WILL, UH, MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 11.GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 3,200 BLOCK OF SOUTH FOSTER ROAD.
IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO THE MAY 27TH MEETING.
WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
UM, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE, BUT YOU ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO SPEAK TODAY.
IT IS TWO 20 AND COMMISSIONER BUSANTE HAS REENTERED THE MEETING.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
5 0 5 CASTANO AVENUE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 0 9.
THIS IS A ONE ACRE TRACK THAT IS REQUESTING THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF COMMERCIAL ZONING IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
NONETHELESS, THIS PROPERTY OWNER PURCHASED THE PROPERTY NOVEMBER, 2022.
THE, THE LOT HAD BEEN, THE ONE ACRE LOT HAD BEEN COMPLETELY CLEARED BY JANUARY, 2023.
AND IT WAS BEING USED TO STORE OVERSIZED TRUCKS BY 2024.
AND IT ALSO RECEIVED A UDC VIOLATION IN 2024.
NONETHELESS, THE OWNER CONTINUES TO OPERATE HIS OVERSIZED TRUCK
[00:10:01]
BUSINESS ON THIS LOT, AND HE HAS ALSO INSTALLED A LARGE CORRUGATED METAL FENCE SURROUNDING THE LOT THAT DOESN'T EVEN COVER THE TALL TRUCKS, WHICH IS ALSO A UDC VIOLATION.THIS ZONING SEEKS TO LEGITIMIZE THESE VIOLATIONS AND UNDERMINES THE PURPOSES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONS.
APPROVING THE ZONING WOULD SET THE PRECEDENT THAT ZONING AND UDC LAWS CAN BE IGNORED AND CORRECTED AFTER THE FACT.
AND THAT SPOT ZONING IS LAWFUL IN SAN ANTONIO.
I REQUEST THAT YOU DENY THE REZONING AND THE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.
IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH YOU MAY SEE.
AND THE RED DOT GOING INTO THE ENTRANCE OF FOSTER MEADOWS IS WHERE THIS TRUCKING OPERATION HAS BEEN AND IS CURRENTLY BEING HELD.
THIS PROPERTY SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ITS RESIDENTIAL ZONING FOR THE SAFETY OF THE AREAS, RESIDENTS AND CHILDREN TO AVOID THE NOISE, TRAFFIC AND VISUAL BLIGHT AND TO PROTECT THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES PROPERTY VALUES.
IT IS NOT THE RIGHT USE, IT IS NOT IN THE RIGHT PLACE AND APPROVING IT WILL SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE.
IT'S INCOMPATIBLE, IT'S SPOT ZONING AND IT WOULD REWARD A VIOLATION IF I MAY POINT OUT.
THIS IS WHERE THE TRUCKING OPERATION CURRENTLY OPERATE.
MA'AM, IF YOU CAN SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE.
THE RED.IS WHERE THIS TRUCKING OPERATION EXISTS.
AND AS YOU MAY SEE, THERE'S NO ENTRANCE TO ALL OF THESE HOMES OTHER THAN RIGHT HERE GOING BY THE TRUCKING OPERATION.
THERE ARE SCHOOL BUSES, CHILDREN, FAMILIES IN THIS AREA.
HE IS VIOLATING THE LAW AND IT SHOULD BE BROUGHT IN COMPLIANCE.
AND THE CONTINUANCE SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S FAIR TO TAKE YOUR TIME OR MY TIME.
HE CONTINUED THE ZONING COMMISSION HEARING.
HE'S CONTINUING THIS ONE AND HE'S NOT COMING INTO COMPLIANCE.
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOU OPPOSE THE ZONING AND CONTINUANCE.
UM, SO, UM, AS PER STAFF, THE APPLICANT IS NOT PRESENT AS PER STAFF.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO MAY THE 27TH.
UM, IS THERE ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? WE WILL START ON THE LEFT WITH WHOEVER IS DOWN THERE.
SO IS IS WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR, UH, IS THIS THE WEAKEST, LESS LEAST INTENSIVE, UH, LAND USE THAT, THAT, THAT WOULD ACCOMPLISH WHAT THEIR, THEIR GOAL IS? REGIONAL COMMERCIAL? 'CAUSE THEY'RE TRYING TO GET A C3, UH, CD.
I BELIEVE THAT THEY COULD DO A C TWO CD, UM, FOR THE OVERSIZED VEHICLE, SALES, SERVICE AND STORAGE.
AND, UM, I WILL ALSO STATE THAT THIS DID GO TO ZONING COMMISSION LAST WEEK AND THEY RECOMMENDED DENIAL.
UM, BUT, BUT REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS WHAT THEY WOULD NEED TO ACCOMPLISH THE C TWO OR THE C3? NO, FOR THE C3, NOT A C TWO.
WHAT WOULD, WHAT WOULD BE THE LAND USE FOR THE C TWO? I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
I'LL BE, I'M NOT GONNA BE IN SUPPORT OF THIS.
JUST SO IN CASE ANYBODY'S WONDERING.
COMMISSIONER MILLER, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ, UH, MOTION TO DENY THE REQUEST.
ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION OF SECOND.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY BY COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ AND A SECOND TO DENY BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL, CAN I ASK A QUICK, QUICK QUESTION? YES, YOU CAN.
DOES WAS THE APPLICANT AWARE THAT TODAY WAS THE CONTINUANCE DAY? YES, THEY HAVE.
SECOND, IT WAS CONTINUED BACK FROM APRIL THE 22ND.
ALSO, THEY ARE REQUESTING A SECOND CONTINUANCE.
SO IT ORIGINALLY WAS CONTINUED FROM APRIL 22ND TO TODAY.
SO THIS WOULD BE THEIR SECOND REQUEST.
WAS THE APPLICANT PRESENT AT THE ZONING COMMISSION HEARING, OR WAS THAT YES, THEY WERE.
IS THERE ANY OTHER COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS? NO.
AND WE HAVE A MOTION THEN A SECOND.
[00:15:01]
SIEGEL? YES.ITEM NUMBER 12, LOCATED AT 1 1 3 9 NEW LAREDO HIGHWAY IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO THE MAY 27TH MEETING.
UH, NOBODY HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, SO I'M JUST GONNA ASK IF THERE'S ANY COMMISSIONER'S, COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE.
MOTION, UH, TO GRANT, UH, UH, CONTINUANCE TO MAY 27TH.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT TO GRANT THE CONTINUANCE TO MAY 27TH.
AND THE SECOND WAS THAT COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ STAFF, PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
MY NAME IS JOEL PALUS ZONE AND PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
ITEM NUMBER 14 IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE GREATER AIRPORT AREA REGIONAL CENTER PLAN LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.
LOCATED AT 1 2 1 3 9 JONES MALTSBERGER ROAD.
THERE ARE 19 NOTICES SENT OUT.
SIX OPPOSED WITHIN 200 FEET, THERE IS NO REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WITHIN 200 FEET.
SEVEN RECEIVED IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED.
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS REQUESTED TO THE PROPERTY TO C3 S GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR AUTO PAINT AND BODY REPAIR WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF VEHICLES AND PARTS PERMITTED, BUT TOTALLY SCREENED FROM VIEW VIEW OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND PUBLIC ROADWAYS.
THE REQUESTED REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IS OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND DESIGNATIONS AND USES.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PRIMARILY COMPRISED OF COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES, WHICH ACCOMMODATES MOR MODERATE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN A NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE PROPOSED LAND USE WOULD PERMIT USE IS MORE INTENSE THAN WHAT IS CHARACTERISTIC OF THE AREA AS A SUBJECT PROPERTY DIRECTLY ABUTS TO THE NORTH, A MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT WITH ESTABLISHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES REZONING TO C3 S WITH A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR AUTO PAINT AND BODY REPAIR.
EVEN IF SCREENED WOULD INTRODUCE AN, AN INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USE WITH POTENTIAL EXTERNAL IMPACTS AS A DISTANCE IS INSUFFICIENT TO ADEQUATELY BUFFER THE LIVABILITY OF THE NEARBY RESIDENTS.
THEREFORE, APPROVING THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION WOULD NOT SUPPORT AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN LAND USES AND PROTECTING OF ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS FROM INCOMPATIBLE COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? WOW.
I'M FERNANDO RAMIREZ AND I REPRESENT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
PARDON ME? STATE YOUR ADDRESS.
YOUR ADDRESS? YOUR ACTUAL ADDRESS.
THREE 18 EAST COMA, SUITE ONE 12, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8 2 1 6.
UM, THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS, UM, THAT HAS BEEN THERE ALREADY DOING STUFF, THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS, THE ONLY THING THAT THEY WERE ASKING FOR, AND THAT IS, IS THE PAINT BOOTH THAT THEY USE AND THE PAINT BOOTH ARE NOW HAVE BEEN IN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO.
THERE'S OVER A THOUSAND OF 'EM.
AND THEY ARE VERY WELL REGULATED BY THE CITY POLLUTION PLACE, THE FIRE MARSHAL.
AND SO THEY, THE, HOW SHOULD I SAY IT, THEY HAVE COME A LONG WAY.
THEY ARE NO LONGER LIKE THE OLD ONES THAT THERE WERE, THERE IS NO LEAD PAINT.
THERE'S NONE OF THAT STUFF THAT HAPPENS.
[00:20:02]
AND THEY WANNA BE PART OF THE COMMUNITY.AND THEY HAVE ACTUALLY STARTED TALKING TO SOME OF THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK.
IN FACT, ONE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEALS IS NOW A CUSTOMER OF THE BUSINESS AND THEY WANTED TO TRY TO BECOME PART OF PART OF THE COMMUNITY AND THEY HAVE WITH OTHER BUSINESSES, BUT ALSO WITH THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK BECAUSE THIS, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE THE RESIDENTIAL IS BEHIND IT, WHICH THEY, THEY WILL HAVE A FAN FENCE AND EVERYTHING THAT YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE.
AND SOME OF THE LADIES, THE OLDER PEOPLE ARE IN THAT LITTLE CUL-DE-SAC IN THE BACK.
AND I PERSONALLY MYSELF, HAS TALKED TO SEVERAL OF THEM.
UM, WE FEEL THAT WE WOULD HAVE A, HE WOULD HAVE A VIABLE BUSINESS AND BE PART OF THE COMMUNITY AND WITH THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK.
SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR, SIR.
THERE IS NOBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
SO WE'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
START ON THE RIGHT WITH COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.
DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE A PERMIT FOR OPERATING A COLLISION BUSINESS AT THAT LOCATION? A A REPAIR SHOP? THE A, A REPAIR, UM, AS FOR SMALL VEHICLES AND TRUCK AND PICKUP TRUCKS.
AND THAT'S WHAT THAT IS FOR THE ADDITION, WHICH IS WHAT REQUESTING, IF YOU, THE WAY IT WAS EXPLAINED IS THAT LITTLE S FOR JUST THE PAINT BOOTH TO DO THE PAINTING AND IT'S ALL ENCLOSED.
AND I FEEL YOU MEAN REPAIR, BODY REPAIR? YES.
AND AS AN EXAMPLE, THEY HAVE NO, THEY HAVE GOTTEN A CONTRACT NO.
BASED HOPEFULLY IN THIS FROM PRIME, AMAZON PRIME.
YOU KNOW, THEY, THEY'RE LITTLE TRUCKS THAT THEY RUN AROUND.
COURSE THEY GET INTO ACCIDENTS.
IS THE COLLISION COMPLIED WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE AS OF NOW? AGAIN, THE, UM, SO THEY DO HAVE AN ACTIVE C OF O FOR AUTO AND LIGHT TRUCK REPAIR THAT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO PERMIT LIKE THE PAINT AND AUTO BODY.
IT WOULD BASICALLY BE FOR MECHANICAL WORK ONLY.
SO THE BODY WORK HE'S MENTIONING IS ALLOWED WITHIN THAT.
AGAIN, THE AUTO AND LIGHT TRUCK REPAIR IS MEANT TO BE JUST FOR MECHANICAL WORK.
AND SO THE ONLY OTHER, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY IS WHAT YOU'RE DOING BODY WORK OR MECHANICAL WORK? NO.
WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO THE BODY WORK.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR TO ADD TO IT.
AND YET YOU RE RENAMED THE BUSINESS TO A COLLISION CENTER, WHICH A COLLISION FACILITY, WHICH MEANS IT'S A BODY WORK THE WAY I UNDERSTAND IT.
UH, IN ITS CURRENT USE, IS THIS CONFORMING WITH COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, THE CURRENT USE, I MEAN, IT, IT COULD BE ALLOWED WITH A C TWO CD OR, UM, LIKE A CONDITIONAL USE OR A MM-HMM
UM, WITH THE EXISTING COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, BUT AGAIN, RIGHT NOW THEY ARE ALLOWED, UM, THEY ARE ZONED C3, WHICH PERMITS THAT USE BY RIGHT, RIGHT BY RIGHT MM-HMM
BUT DOES NOT ALLOWED IN COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AS IT IS.
IT'S NOT PERMITTED DISTRICT CURRENTLY IN COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
IS IT C3? C3 IS NOT A ZONING DISTRICT THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED, ALIGNED, OR ALIGNED WITH COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
BUT AGAIN, THE ZONING WAS ESTABLISHED BEFORE THIS PLAN WAS ADOPTED.
UM, SO A POTENTIAL, BUT, BUT FOR THE PAINT AND COLLISION, C TWO CONDITIONAL USE IS NOT AN OPTION.
SO IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, AUTO PAINT AND BODY IS PERMITTED WITH AN S SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION IN THE C3 DISTRICT.
[00:25:01]
ALSO PERMITTED BY WRIGHT IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, WHICH MEANS IT COULD BE CONDITIONED DOWN TO A C TWO CD, WHICH WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION.AND THUS NOT REQUIRE A PLAN AMENDMENT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
BUT I, I WILL STATE ALSO, THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN THAT CONCERN.
COLLISION REPAIR TYPICALLY IS NOT MEANT FOR FOLKS TO BRING IN FOR USUAL TYPICAL MECHANICAL WORK.
TYPICALLY WHEN YOU GO TO A COLLISION REPAIR, YOU'RE GOING THERE BECAUSE YOUR CAR HAS BEEN IN, IN, IN AN IMPACT, AN ACCIDENT AND NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED.
PEOPLE DO NOT GO TO THESE LOCATIONS FOR THEIR OIL CHANGES OR WHATNOT.
SO HE WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED THAT, THAT USE WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED.
IT WOULD HAVE TO STRAIGHT BE A COLLISION REPAIR IF THEY WERE TO GO WITH THAT ZONING.
BUT WITH THAT C3 S, IT WOULD PERMIT BOTH THE COLLISION REPAIR ALONG WITH MECHANICAL AUTO AND LIGHT TRUCK REPAIR? YES, SIR.
CAN I ASK A QUESTION? YES, SIR.
LISTENING TO WHAT SHE'S SAYING.
SO IF, IF WE GET THE S FOR THE PING RIGHT, OR WE DON'T, BUT DOES THAT MEAN WE CAN'T DO THE OIL CHANGES AND YOU KNOW, THE MINOR REPAIRS THAT WE'RE STILL DOING? THAT'S A STAFF QUESTION.
LET ME APPROACH THIS ONE FROM A DIFFERENT ANGLE.
IS THE ULTIMATE GOAL TO BE ABLE TO DO MECHANICAL WORK, BODY WORK AND PAINT? YES, SIR.
THEN THEY NEED THE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THEY NEED THE C3 S.
BECAUSE IT'S ALL, IT'S ALL ONE THING.
WHEN THEY BRING A CAR FROM THE INSURANCE THAT IS HAD OF TEMP, YOU GOTTA REPLACE THE LIGHT OR DO THE OIL CHANGE OR A BRAKES, YOU KNOW, ON THE ONE ON ONE WHEEL.
SO YOU DO DO MECHANICAL STUFF.
FROM A LAND USE PERSPECTIVE, THAT'S FOR, YOU KNOW, IT GIVES US PAUSE, UH, ESPECIALLY 'CAUSE I BELIEVE THE BUFFERING AND, UH, SETBACKS ARE, ARE GRANDFATHER CORRECT? BECAUSE THIS ABUTS RESIDENTIAL ARE THE SAME.
SO BECAUSE IT'S AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, THEY WOULD NOT NEED TO ADD IN ANY, UM, BRAND NEW, UH, BUFFERS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
ONLY IF THEY WERE BUILDING SOMETHING NEW WOULD OUR CURRENT CODE APPLY.
THERE ARE BUFFERS CURRENTLY, BUT IF THERE ARE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND THERE'S A FENCE IN THE BACK AND THE ACTUAL NEIGHBOR IN THE BACK IS NOW A CUSTOMER AND, AND WE ACTUALLY TRYING, TRYING TO BE WITH THE COMMUNITY, WE SAID, WHAT DO YOU GUYS WANT? DO YOU GUYS WANT US TO BUILD A, A FENCE AND EVERYTHING? HE SAYS, AH, DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT, BUT I'M SURE THAT'S HIM.
BUT THE PEOPLE NEXT TO EACH OTHER.
SO WE'VE BEEN TRYING AND HOPEFULLY WE WILL HAVE A SUCCESS AND BEING PART OF THEM.
UM, SIR, BEFORE YOU SIT BACK DOWN, CAN YOU DESCRIBE TO ME THE BUFFER THAT'S PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THE SITE TO PROTECT THE RESIDENCES? WHAT BUFFER IS EXISTS? IT ACTUALLY, IT'S THE, THE RESIDENT BEHIND US IS HIS BACKYARD AND THERE IS A FENCE AND THE FENCE WHICH WOULD BE THERE.
THE BUILDING FENCE IS GRASS ON, ON THE BUILDING ON OUR SIDE IS GRASS BEFORE THE CONCRETE STARTS.
SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S A FENCE AT THE PROPERTY LINE? NO.
UM, PLEASE JUST ALLOW ME TO CONTINUE MY STATEMENT.
SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S A FENCE AT THE PROPERTY LINE MM-HMM
AND THERE'S GRASS ON THE BUSINESS SIDE OF THE FENCE AS WELL AS WHATEVER'S IN THE NEIGHBOR'S YARD.
CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE FENCE FOR ME? YES.
IT'S A CYCLONE FENCE THAT'S ONLY, SO IT'S CHAIN LINK FENCE.
SO IN OTHER WORDS, ANY KIND OF NOISE OR VAPORS OR LIQUIDS COULD PASS RIGHT THROUGH IT? YES, MA'AM.
NOW, STAFF, CAN YOU DESCRIBE FOR ME WHAT KIND OF BUFFERS WOULD BE REQUIRED IF THIS WERE TO BE, UM, A SITUATION WHERE A NEW BUSINESS WAS WANTING TO MAKE A NEW SITE PLAN TO DO THESE KINDS OF FUNCTIONS? SO THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED, SAY IF THEY WERE TO REBUILD OR NEED TO DO, PUT IN THE APPLICABLE BUFFERS, YOU WOULD BE REQUIRED A C TYPE, UH, 15 FOOT BUFFER, AND THEN A SOLID, UM, FENCE.
SO A SOLID FENCE COULD BE A WOOD FENCE OR CINDER BLOCK.
BUT THEN THEY WOULD NEED 15 FEET OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
AND THEN THAT'S NOT JUST GRASS, RIGHT? CORRECT.
UM, A SEA TYPE BUFFER TYPICALLY PERMITS, UM, A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT CANOPY TREES.
UM, UNDERSTORY, LARGE, MEDIUM, UM, SHRUBS.
SO THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT'S LIKELY TO BE DONE, UM, BY THE PROPERTY OWNER IF THEY GET PERMISSION TO DO THE THINGS THAT THEY'RE WANTING TO DO NOW WITHOUT ALREADY HAVING
[00:30:01]
PROVIDED THAT BUFFER? NO, WE ASKED TO SEE IF, IF WHATEVER THEY WANT US TO DO, WE WOULD SPECIFICALLY DO IT.BUT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN PROPERTY OWNERS ARE NOT THE SAME THING AS WHAT'S REQUIRED BY LAW.
AND ALSO WHATEVER WE DECIDE FOR TODAY IS NOT JUST FOR WHOEVER'S LIVING IN THE HOUSE AND WHOEVER'S OWN THE BUSINESS.
NOW WE'RE, WE HAVE TO THINK 20 YEARS, 50 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD.
WE WOULD ACTUALLY, LIKE, WE ALWAYS USUALLY DO, WE'D HAVE TO GO TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND SAY, HERE'S THIS AND WE WANT TO BUILD THIS FENCE AND GET A BUILDING PERMIT FOR IT.
BUT THAT'S ONLY IF YOU WANNA MAKE CHANGES.
COMMISSIONER WALLER DID NO QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ? NO QUESTIONS.
SO I'M LOOKING AT THIS, UM, THIS PLAN WAS ADOPTED IN 2025.
UM, IS IT, IS IT, I THOUGHT THE CITY, WHEN THEY ADOPT THESE PLANS, THEIR THEIR GOAL WAS TO TRY TO MATCH THE EXISTING ZONING THAT'S THERE.
IS THAT, AM I OFF ON THAT OR THAT'S NOT TRUE.
WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS NOT PROCESSING LARGE AREA REZONINGS TO ALIGN EXISTING ZONING WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN.
UH, WE HAVE AT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A LARGE AREA REZONING TEAM THAT IS INSTRUCTED BY CCR IN DEFINED AREAS TO ALIGN ZONING WITH LAND USE AND EXISTING USES.
BUT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PROPERTIES WHERE LAND USE PLANS HAVE BEEN ADOPTED, WHERE THE ZONING STILL DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE NEW PLAN.
I, I'M, I'M, I WAS JUST ASKING ABOUT THE HISTORY 'CAUSE THIS AREA'S KIND OF BEEN IN THE CITY LIMITS FOR A LITTLE WHILE AND, AND IF IT'S BEEN C3 FOR A LITTLE WHILE, DID THE SECTOR PLAN SUPPORT THE C3 OR ANY OF THE PREVIOUS PLANS THAT WERE IN EFFECT PRIOR TO OCTOBER OF 2025? IF YOU JUST GIMME A MOMENT, I CAN SEE WHAT IT, WHAT THE PRIOR LAND USE WAS.
AND I BELIEVE IT WAS NOT REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EITHER.
AND DID THIS APPLICANT, SOMEONE ELSE MAY ANSWER THIS.
SO ACCORDING TO THIS GOOGLE STREET VIEW, THEIR USE AS A, AS A COLLISION REPAIR HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE AT LEAST 2024.
AND, UM, YOU KNOW, THEY'VE BEEN, THEY'VE BEEN OPERATING OUTSIDE OF THEIR ALLOWED ZONING SINCE THEN.
I ASSUME AGAIN, THE UM, C OF O THAT I HAVE HERE FROM 2024 IS FOR AUTO AND LIGHT TRUCK REPAIR, OIL LUBE AND TWO TUNEUP ENTIRE INSTALLATION.
I WILL STATE THAT IT DID, UM, THERE WAS A, UM, INSPECTOR THAT GOES OUT JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY REQ MATCH THOSE USES.
SO I'M ASSUMING WHEN THE INSPECTOR HAD GONE OUT THERE, THEY DID NOT FIND ANY OTHER COLLISION ITEMS LIKE AUTO AND PAINT AND BODY.
YEAH, BECAUSE THE NAME OF THE BUSINESS WAS BUDGET COLLISION.
UH, AND THEN LASTLY, WHEN YOU CHANGED, WHEN YOU GET A BRAND NEW CFO FOR A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT USE, I KNOW THAT THE CITY LOOKS AT PARKING AND THEY LOOK AT DIFFERENT THINGS.
DO THEY LOOK AT BUFFERS DURING THAT TYPE OF CFO CHANGE? NO, THEY DO NOT.
THEY TYPICALLY JUST LOOK AT THE, UM, THE PARKING FOR NO CONSTRUCTION CFO APPLICATION.
I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY THAT THIS ZOOM IS A LITTLE CHALLENGING FROM A PERSPECTIVE I GET WHAT THE APPLICANT'S TRYING TO DO AND, YOU KNOW, IMPROVE HIS BUSINESS AND MOVE FORWARD AND IT ISN'T REALLY A LOT DIFFERENT FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN AS TO WHAT HE'S DOING NOW.
'CAUSE MOST OF THE DIFFERENCES WOULD BE INSIDE.
BUT I DO HAVE QUITE A BIT OF HEARTBURN OVER A REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND ON A 0.5 ACRE TRACT IN AN AREA THAT IS NOT, UM, REALLY SUITABLE FOR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.
AND, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN, YOU KNOW, EVERY TIME I SEE A REGIONAL COMMERCIAL ON A SMALL TRACT IN THE MIDDLE OF A AREA LIKE THAT, YOU KNOW, MY, MY GUT IS DENIAL BECAUSE IT DOESN'T FIT THE BILL.
AND, UH, JUST 'CAUSE I DON'T REALLY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH WHAT THE GUY'S TRYING TO DO DOESN'T MEAN I CAN DEVIATE FROM THAT TENANT THAT I HAVE.
SO, UH, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO MAINTAIN WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL BASED ON THAT.
AND I WILL STATE, JUST TO ANSWER, UH, COMMISSIONER OREN'S QUESTION.
THIS WAS PART OF THE OLDER SAN ANTONIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VICINITY LAND USE PLAN AND IT WAS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AS WELL.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ENTERTAIN A MOTION I MOVE TO DENY THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALLER.
[00:35:01]
WALLER? YES.VERACRUZ STREET IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO THE MAY 27TH MEETING.
ANY QUESTIONS OR A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? NO.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE TO MAY 27TH.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO MAY 27TH.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
LOCATED AT 2 2 3 EAST PETALUMA BOULEVARD IS REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO THE MAY 27TH MEETING.
UH, WE DO HAVE TWO PEOPLE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
UM, KEEP IN MIND THIS IS BEING CONTINUED.
SO YOU DON'T WANNA SPEAK TODAY? GREAT.
SO THAT TAKES CARE OF THE PEOPLE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
UH, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ANY COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS OR MOTION.
MOTION TO GRANT APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUATION TO THE MAY 27TH PC MEETING.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PROFIT TO, UH, APPROVE THE CONTINUANCE TO MAY 27TH.
AND WAS THE SECOND COMMISSIONER MILLER.
MOTION PASSES FOR CONTINUANCE.
GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS AT ADE GOLDMAN SENIOR PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
ITEM 18 IS REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE NORTHWEST COMMUNITY PLANT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LOCATED GENERALLY AT 5 9 9 5 HEATH ROAD.
THERE ARE 40, 40 NOTICES MAILED ZERO IN FAVOR.
ONE OPPOSED? THERE IS NO REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WITHIN 200 FEET.
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL IS REQUESTED TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM C ONE LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO C TWO COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY TO COMMERCIAL LAND USE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION NOT TO ALLOW A NEW USE, BUT TO BYPASS THE SIZE PROTECTIONS INHERENT BY THE C ONE ZONING.
THE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LIMIT EXISTS SPECIFICALLY TO PROTECT LOW DENSITY TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS FROM OVERSCALE DEVELOPMENT.
TO GRANT THIS CHANGE WOULD BE TO DISCARD DELIBERATE NEIGHBORHOODS SAFEGUARDS AND OPEN THE DOOR TO FUTURE USES THAT MAY BE FUNDAMENTALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THIS COMMUNITY.
CHANGING THE DESIGNATION TO A COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DOESN'T JUST ALLOW LARGE BUILDINGS.
IT ENTITLES THE LAND TO BROADER RANGE USES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE NOW AND THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE IS HERE ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS.
THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
HI, GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.
ASHLEY FAIRMONT WITH KILLEN GRIFFIN AND FAIRMONT.
UH, MY ADDRESS IS 1 0 1 0 1 REUNION PLACE.
I'M HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
PRASHANT RAO IS HERE IN THE BACK.
HE IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND, UH, WOULD BE THE OWNER AND MANAGER OF THE BUSINESS THAT I'LL TALK ABOUT IN JUST A LITTLE BIT.
UM, SO ASIO MENTIONED THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON HEATH ROAD.
UM, THERE'S A, IT IS NEXT TO SINGLE FAMILY, BUT WE ACTUALLY THINK THAT IT'S A GOOD LOCATION FOR WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY.
UM, THERE IS A WIDE VARIETY OF OTHER USES IN THE AREA, UM, AND THE PROPOSED USE HERE IS A PICKLEBALL AND PADDLEBALL FACILITY.
SO IT WOULD BE A SPACE THAT INCLUDES INDOOR BUILDINGS, UH, THAT HAVE PICKLEBALL COURTS AND
[00:40:01]
THEN ALSO PADDLEBALL COURTS.UM, AND REALLY WE THINK THAT IT'S A COMMUNITY AMENITY.
UH, IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SOMETHING THAT'S NEARBY, UH, HOMEOWNERS TO VISIT.
THEY CAN BE MEMBERS, UM, OR THEY CAN RENT TO COURT.
AND THEN IT CREATES, YOU KNOW, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE NOT ONLY TO DO SOMETHING HEALTHY, UM, BUT ALSO TO HAVE A PLACE WHERE THEY CAN MEET UP WITH THEIR FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND DO SOMETHING FUN AS WELL.
UH, SO HERE AGAIN IS THE PROPERTY.
UM, WHAT YOU SEE OUTLINED IN YELLOW IS WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING THE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR.
UM, IT ALSO DOES HAVE ACCESS TO HEATH ROAD.
WE'RE JUST NOT REZONING THAT PIECE.
UM, AND SO WE'RE NOT REQUESTING A PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THAT, BUT I'LL SHOW YOU A MAP OF THAT IN A SECOND.
UM, SO AGAIN, THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENT ON IS 4.3 ACRES.
UH, RAO OWNS IS ABOUT 5.6 ACRES.
UM, THE CURRENT ZONING IS C ONE.
SO JUST TO POINT OUT THAT, THAT ZONING IS ALREADY INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE IN THE LAND USE PLAN.
SO THE, THE PLAN CALLS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, BUT AGAIN, IT'S, IT'S ZONED C ONE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH C ONE ZONING.
UM, SO WE DO THINK THAT THAT IS APPROPRIATE, EVEN JUST BASED ON THE EXISTING ZONING.
UM, AS STAFF MENTIONED, WE ARE REQUESTING THE CHANGE TO ALLOW FOR NOT A USE DIFFERENCE.
UM, PICKLE AND PADDLE BALL COURTS, INDOOR FACILITIES ARE ALLOWED IN C ONE ZONING.
UM, SO THAT IS ALREADY PERMITTED BY RIGHT, BUT WHAT C ONE DOES IS IT RESTRICTS BUILDING SIZE.
SO YOU CAN ONLY HAVE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDINGS IN C ONE AND ONLY UP TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET TOTAL.
SO WE UNDERSTAND THE LIMITATIONS THAT COME ALONG WITH C ONE, BUT I THINK THE INTENT OF C ONE IS REALLY TO BE ON SMALLER PROPERTIES.
UM, IF YOU GO 15,000 SQUARE FEET ON 5.6 ACRES, THAT'S 6% OF YOUR PROPERTY CAN BE A BUILDING.
SO HERE WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR THE C TWO AND WE'RE ADDING THE NA TO ALLOW FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS TO BE LARGER THAN 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
UM, THE, I'LL SHOW YOU A PLAN IN A SECOND, BUT THE INTENT IS TO HAVE, UM, A COUPLE LARGER BUILDINGS WHERE YOU HAVE THE PICKLEBALL COURTS TOGETHER, WHERE YOU HAVE UP TO, YOU KNOW, FOUR OR FIVE COURTS IN THE SAME BUILDING.
IF YOU DO SOMETHING SMALLER THAN THAT AND YOU HAVE MAYBE TWO COURTS IN A BUILDING, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SCATTERED ACROSS THE PROPERTY, WHICH FROM A, A CONSTRUCTION PERSPECTIVE ISN'T REALLY EFFICIENT.
BUT ALSO FROM THIS IDEA OF COMMUNITY IN A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE WANNA GO, PEOPLE DON'T NECESSARILY WANNA PLAY PICKLEBALL ON ONE COURT AND ONE BUILDING ALONE.
UM, SO IT ALLOWS MORE COURTS IN THE SAME BUILDING.
UH, HERE AGAIN IS THE, THE PROPERTY AND THE ZONING MAP.
UM, AND, AND JUST IF YOU, YOU CAN SEE ON HERE THAT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS C3 AND A TO THE NORTH.
SO MUCH MORE INTENSE COMMERCIAL ZONING.
UM, AND THEN THERE IS C TWO AND A AND C3 AND A ACROSS THE STREET.
SO COMMERCIAL ZONING DOES EXIST IN THE AREA IN HIGHER INTENSITIES.
UH, AGAIN, ASKING FOR THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
UH, THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH THAT ARE COMMERCIAL ARE ALSO NOT DESIGNATED CORRECT IN THE PLAN.
UH, BUT THERE IS BUSINESS OFFICE PARK THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED ACROSS HEATH ROAD.
UH, IT INCLUDED THIS SLIDE JUST TO SHOW KINDA THE DIFFERENT USES IN THE AREA.
UH, THERE IS A SOCCER FACILITY, SO SOME PRECEDENT FOR FITNESS, UM, JUST TO THE NORTHEAST OR SO.
BUT THAT IS A, A MORE INTENSE USE BECAUSE IT IS OUTDOORS AND THIS WOULD ALL BE AGAIN, INDOORS.
UH, SO HERE'S A CONCEPTUAL PLAN.
UM, AND SO THE, AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE THE ACCESS FROM HEATH ROAD.
UM, AND JUST TO POINT OUT, THAT IS FLOODPLAIN.
SO YOU KNOW, THE IDEA OF THIS BEING SINGLE FAMILY WITH ONE ACCESS POINT TO HEATH ROAD, UH, THROUGH FLOODPLAIN AND IT'S PROBABLY NOT IDEAL EITHER.
UM, BUT THAT WILL HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED WHEN, UH, YOU KNOW, A NEW DRIVEWAY IS BUILT TO THE PROPERTY.
UH, AND THEN THIS IS JUST AGAIN, THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN WITH A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT BUILDINGS, UH, THAT ARE LARGER THAN 5,000 SQUARE FEET WITH A COUPLE OF COURTS IN THOSE BUILDINGS.
AND THEN JUST SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS, I KNOW THIS IS NOT, UM, LAND USE DISCUSSION, BUT SOME OF THE DETAILS ON THE BUSINESS.
UM, SEVEN TO 10, AGAIN, MEMBERSHIP OR DROP IN.
THERE IS AN EXISTING, UM, OFFICE ON THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE CONVERTED TO KINDA THE OFFICE FOR THE FACILITY AS WELL.
UM, ALL AGAIN, ALL INSIDE WITH EVEN C ONE OR C TWO ZONING, IT CANNOT BE OUTDOORS.
UM, THE SMALLER BUILDINGS, OR SORRY, CONSOLIDATED BUILDINGS ALLOW FOR SOME TREE SAVE AREAS, THERE WILL BE SIX TO EIGHT FOOT PRIVACY FENCE CONSTRUCTED.
UM, AND THEN AGAIN, MORE THAN ENOUGH PARKING, UH, FOR THE BUSINESS.
SO, UM, WITH THAT WE HOPE YOU WILL, UM, RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST.
UH, AND AGAIN, FROM THE ZONING PERSPECTIVE, JUST C ONE TO C TWO, AGAIN, WE ARE ADDING THE NA SO THERE'S GONNA BE NO ALCOHOL USE.
UH, AND THEN ALSO THERE THERE AREN'T THAT MANY DIFFERENT USES BETWEEN C ONE AND C TWO.
UM, AND THEN IN TERMS OF FEASIBILITY OF PROPERTY THAT DOESN'T REALLY HAVE FRONTAGE, UM, FROM VISIBILITY FROM
[00:45:01]
A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS STANDPOINT, WE ACTUALLY THINK THIS IS A REALLY GOOD USE OF THE PROPERTY.SO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.
UH, NO ONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, SO WE'LL MOVE TO COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS.
START WITH COMMISSIONER MILLER.
SO I NOTICED ON THE STAFF REPORT THAT THEY'RE PURSUING IDZ ZONING ZONING.
THAT'S WHAT IT SAID IN THE, WHAT THE USES ALLOWED INTO C TWO.
IS THAT TRUE? I DO NOT SEE IDZ.
I'M SORRY, BUT IT ALL THEY'RE REQUESTING IS C TWO.
UH, I WAS LOOKING AT, UM, I HOPE I'M NOT IN THE WRONG ONE HERE, BUT I WAS THE LAST PAGE OF THE ZONING COMMISSION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.
SO THEY ARE ASKING, APOLOGIZE,
I HAVEN'T
ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER CHES, I JUST WANNA GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN JUST TO VERIFY THOSE BUFFERS THAT WOULD BE PROVIDED WITH THE NEW CONSTRUCTION.
YEAH, I CAN GET BACK THERE AND, AND I'M SURE YOU KNOW IT BY HEART.
UM, BUT BETWEEN C ONE AND C TWO ZONING AND THE R SIX, IT'S A 15 FOOT, UH, TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
UM, WHAT'S PROPOSED HERE IS GONNA BE BIGGER THAN THAT.
THERE'S ENOUGH ROOM ON THE PROPERTY.
YEAH, I THINK JUST TO CONFIRM WHAT ASHLEY SAID, C ONE AND C ONE AND C TWO REQUEST OR REQUIRE THE SAME BUFFER.
UM, AND SO 15 FOOT B BUFFER ALONG ANY PROPERTIES, THAT'S A BUDDING THE R SIX, BUT I THINK THERE'S AN MP 10 TO THERE AND THAT DOES REQUIRE A C BUFFER, SAME DISTANCE, JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE LANDSCAPING.
AND ALSO WITH BEING A COMMERCIAL USE, THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PUT IN A SIX FOOT, UH, SOLID FENCE.
SO THERE IS ONE BEING PROVIDED ON THE NP 10 SIDE AS WELL.
IT'S A LARGER RESIDENTIAL TRACK.
YEAH, I THINK BEHIND BUILDING A, IT LOOKS LIKE THIS IS CONCEPTUAL, IT GETS A LITTLE BIT NARROWER BEHIND BUILDING, YOU SEE.
SO WE'LL HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT ACCOMMODATES THE 15 FEET THERE.
COMMISSIONER WALLER SAID, UM, I HAVE A QUESTION.
WHY DID THE, UM, IT WAS UH, RECOMMENDED AS DENIAL.
WHY DID THE STAFF RECOMMEND RECOMMEND DENIAL? TYPICALLY BASED AS RAIO SAID, UM, BASICALLY C ONE HAS A, UM, MAXIMUM ON BUILDING SIZES.
SO YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM ONE BUILDING IS 5,000 SQUARE FEET AND THEN A OVERALL OF 15,000, WHEREAS C TWO DOES NOT HAVE THAT MAXIMUM.
UM, I HAVE A SEMI PERTINENT QUESTION.
I'M SEEING A DESIGNATION FOR SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN THE SITE PLAN HERE.
CAN YOU TELL ME ABOUT THAT? YEAH, I, I DON'T HAVE TOO MUCH DETAIL, BUT THE PLAN RIGHT NOW IS FOR IT TO BE ON SEPTIC.
BOW CAN CONFIRM, BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S SEWER NEARBY THE CAMERA.
UH, PRASHANT RAO 5 9 9 5 HEATH ROAD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
UM, SO THERE IS NO CITY SEWAGE THAT RUNS TO THE PROPERTY.
SO IT'S CURRENTLY ON UH, A SEPTIC SYSTEM.
UM, AND UH, IN DISCUSSING WITH DEVELOPERS, THERE ARE LARGER SEPTIC SYSTEMS THAT COULD ACCOMMODATE, UM, THE INTERMITTENT, UH, USE THAT UH, THESE PLAYERS WOULD HAVE.
I MEAN AS FAR AS I THINK THE SEPTIC, THAT WILL BE UP TO THE TCEQ TO MAKE SURE YOU GET THE NECESSARY PERMITS.
UM, I UNDERSTAND STAFF'S POSITION, BUT I FIND AS MS. FARMAN MENTIONED THAT BEING A FLOOD ZONE, THIS IS PROBABLY NEVER GOING TO GET DEVELOPED INTO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
AND IT SOUNDS LIKE UH, YOU GUYS HAVE GONE TO SOME PRETTY GOOD
[00:50:01]
LENGTHY, UM, OR THOUGHT ABOUT IT VERY LENGTH ABOUT HOW TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS.AND IT SEEMS LIKE SOME OF THE COMMUNITY HERES SEEMS, UH, MOLLIFIED BY YOUR COMMENTS.
GOOD LUCK, BUT NO QUESTIONS OR MORE COMMENTS.
COMMISSIONER ZUKI, UM, POTENTIALLY C TWO NA IN THE FUTURE, WHAT WOULD BE THE POTENTIAL USE OF IT IF YOU DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS FOR A NEXT OR YOU SELL IT TO SOMEBODY ELSE? UM, I CAN ADDRESS THAT.
SO WE TOOK A LOOK AT WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN C ONE AND C TWO, UM, DISSIPATING.
UH, WITH THE NA, SO I DO HAVE A LIST FOR YOU.
UM, AND HERE ARE JUST THE MAIN DIFFERENCES.
AND AGAIN, A LOT OF THESE I THINK, UM, WOULD NEVER GO HERE.
SO TO ME THE MOST INTENSE DIFFERENCES ARE THE AUTO USES.
YOU COULD DO, UM, LIKE A JIFFY LUBE.
THAT'S KINDA THE MOST INTENSE AUTO USE YOU COULD HAVE IN A C TWO.
UM, AND THEN THE OTHER USES HERE ARE THINGS LIKE A PARKING LOT, WHICH I'M NOT REALLY SURE WHY YOU WOULD DO A PARKING LOT HERE, BUT THAT IS A DIFFERENCE AS WELL.
AND THEN, THEN SOME OF THE OTHERS, IF YOU WANNA TAKE A LOOK, UM, CONVENIENCE STORE, YOU COULD HAVE HERE, UM, A NURSERY WHERE YOU GROW YOUR OWN PLANTS.
TAMALE PREPARATION SCHOOL, UH, A BUSINESS SCHOOL.
YOU COULD DO A REGULAR SCHOOL HERE ALREADY BY RIGHT.
SO THE HIGHLIGHTED ONES ARE THE, THE DIFFERENCE MEDICAL CLINIC IN STORAGE.
SO THERE IS A 45 ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USE UNDER C TWO.
HAVE THIS AMENDMENT BEEN APPROVED? YES.
AND ONE OF THEM COULD BE A PROBLEMATIC TO THE RESIDENTIALS CROSS FROM THEM, WHICH IS LIKE THE AUTO, AUTO USE, WHICH CAN BE ALLOWED BY A, AGAIN, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE LIKE A OIL CHANGE PLACE AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO COME TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL TO GET THAT PERMIT FROM THAT BUSINESS TO, TO OPERATE.
WE DID, AND EMILY CAN ELABORATE ON THIS, WE DID REACH OUT TO THE MISTY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, UM, BECAUSE DR.
RAO IS PERFECTLY WILLING TO RESTRICT AGAINST THESE USES.
UM, BUT WE'RE NEVER ABLE TO RECEIVE RESPONSE.
THERE IS ANY RESTRICTION FROM THE CITY THAT WE CAN PUT IN PLACE TO LIMIT THE USE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ROCKET PLAY OR NO.
SO RIGHT NOW THEY'RE PERMITTED ANY USE IN A C ONE AND IF IT IS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL FOR C TWO, THEY WOULD BE PERMITTED ANY RE ANY USE PERMITTED IN A C TWO BASED ZONING.
AND SO COMMISSIONER WE ALSO LOOKED AT WAS THERE ANY OTHER, COULD WE CONDITION IT? COULD WE DO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT? COULD WE DO A DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICT? UH, AND AS KELLY MENTIONED, WE WENT THROUGH ALL OF THAT AND THIS WAS REALLY THE ONLY OPTION.
WE CAN'T CONDITION IT BECAUSE THE ONLY OPTION WOULD BE AN OFFICE AND YOU CAN'T CONDITION INTO AN OFFICE ZONING.
UM, AND THEN WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW, COULD YOU DO AN IDZ AND RESTRICT USES, BUT THIS IS NOT THE LOCATION FOR THAT.
UM, AND SO THERE REALLY WASN'T ANY WAY TO DO IT.
HAVE BEEN, UH, ANY COMMUNICATION WITH THE RESIDENTS, UM, OR THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FUTURE USE OF THIS? SO AGAIN, WE, WE TRIED BEFORE, EVEN BEFORE SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION MULTIPLE TIMES TO ENGAGE WITH THE REGISTERED ASSOCIATION AND RECEIVE NO RESPONSE.
WE'RE ABLE TO TALK TO THE PREVIOUS PRESIDENT OF THAT GROUP AND THEY TRIED TO HELP.
UM, BUT WE, WE COULDN'T GET ANYONE TO ENGAGE.
UM, WE WERE ABLE TO DID THEN SEND OUT LETTERS, UM, TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET.
I'M HAPPY TO CHAT WITH PEOPLE HERE TODAY.
MAYBE THEY CAN HELP US GET SOMEBODY TO ENGAGE.
SORRY, JUST, JUST SOME CLARIFICATION MR. ZUKI.
SO, I MEAN THIS IS LIKE A PASSION PROJECT FOR ME.
I LOVE TO, TO PLAY THESE RACKET SPORTS.
I MEAN IT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLAYING OUTSIDE RIGHT NOW AND PLAYING INSIDE.
THERE'S JUST NOT THAT MANY PLACES TO, TO PLAY IN AN AIR CONDITIONED COMFORTABLE FACILITY.
I WOULDN'T BE CONSTRUCTING SOMETHING WITH THE INTENTION OF IT GOING ANYWHERE ANYTIME SOON.
THESE ARE GONNA BE LIKE TOURNAMENT GRADE COURTS, BOTH THE PICKLE AND PADEL BALL AND I'M HOPING THEY'LL LAST FOR DECADES.
THIS ISN'T SOME LIKE, UH, TRANSITIONAL SORT OF THING.
I'M, I'M HOPING TO, I I TOTALLY AGREE.
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE USE YOU ARE PROPOSING TODAY.
[00:55:01]
THIS INTO PERSPECTIVE IN THE FUTURE, HAVE YOU DECIDED TO SELL THIS FOR WHATEVER REASON, WHICH IS ALWAYS AN OPTION ON THE TABLE, THAT SOMEBODY MIGHT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE C TWO NEAR RESIDENTIALS FOR A USE THAT'S ALLOWED BY THE CITY TO BE USED? I'M NOT QUESTIONING.IT IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ASPECT.
ALRIGHT, UM, NEXT COMMISSIONER.
UH, WHAT'S THE STATUS OF THE ASSOCIATED ZONING CASE AT THIS TIME? IT IS, UM, SUPPOSED TO GO TO ZONING COMMISSION NEXT WEEK ON TUESDAY THE 19TH.
NO OTHER QUESTIONS? NO QUESTION BRIEFLY, MS. MS. FAIRMAN, YOU ALREADY ADDRESSED IT, BUT I'M GOING TO HIT IT AGAIN.
UH, TALK TO HER BEFORE ZONING PLEASE.
SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING WE CAN DO.
ANOTHER QUESTION IF YOU DON'T MIND.
UH, THIS IS FOR, UH, FOR THE APPLICANT.
ARE YOU GONNA BE PLATTING THIS INTO MULTIPLE LOTS TO WHERE YOU COULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF MULTIPLE INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS UNDER C ONE? YEAH, I THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
WE COULD PLOT IT INTO DIFFERENT LOTS AND THEN HAVE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDINGS, BUT IT, THAT IS FEASIBLE AND THAT IT'S AN OPTION.
THE, THE ISSUE THERE IS IT, IT ALLOWS FOR LIKE TWO COURTS IN A BUILDING AND JUST DOESN'T KIND OF CREATE THAT COMMUNITY VIBE GOAL.
UM, THAT GOING FOR HERE WHEN, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IT'S, IT'S PEOPLE COME HERE TO PLAY BUT ALSO TO BE WITH OTHER PEOPLE.
AND, AND THE QUESTION FOR STAFF.
UH, COULD THIS APPLICANT GO TO THE BO OA FOR AN EXCEPTION FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE? I BELIEVE THAT COULD BE THE CASE.
I WAS ABOUT TO CONFIRM WITH MY TEAM.
I MEAN, 'CAUSE THAT YOU CAN GET THAT ANSWER.
I THINK WE'RE OFF FOUR WEEKS BEFORE WE HAVE OUR MEETINGS.
IF THEY WERE TO APPLY BY BY THIS FRIDAY, YOU COULD BE HEARD IN ABOUT FOUR WEEKS.
AND MAYBE WE TABLE THIS, UH, UNTIL THEN JUST TO SEE IF PEOPLE ARE, IF IF WE DON'T THINK WE HAVE THE VOTES TODAY, THAT'S ONE, ONE AVENUE THAT COULD HAPPEN BEFORE WE VOTE ON IT.
UM, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
UM, WHEN I FIRST READ THE AGENDA, I WAS LIKE, WOW, THIS SOUNDS KIND OF SHADY.
RIGHT? UM, BUT THEN AFTER, YOU KNOW, HEARING THE PRESENTATION, IT REALLY CHANGED MY PERSPECTIVE ON IT, YOU KNOW, AND I GUESS WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY IS, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, I I THINK STAFF COULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB OF DESCRIBING THE PROJECT ON THIS ONE.
HONESTLY, IT REALLY KIND OF THREW ME FOR A LOOP BECAUSE I MEAN, YOU GUYS USUALLY DO A GREAT JOB, BUT THIS ONE I WAS LIKE, NO, WHEN I READ, WHEN I READ THE AGENDA, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE IT WAS LIKE, OH, THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO CIRCUMVENT SOMETHING.
WELL THAT'S A, THAT'S A TRIGGER, YOU KNOW, BUT THEN YOU HEAR WHAT'S REALLY HAPPENING AND THE PROJECT MAKES SENSE TO ME AND I GET WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO AND IT'S CHA THEIR PRESENTATION CHANGED MY MIND.
SO I'M GONNA BE IN FAVOR OF THIS ITEM.
BUT I JUST LIKE ZUKI WAS SAYING, THIS COULD BE SOMETHING ELSE LATER ON.
BUT I JUST THINK THAT MAYBE A LITTLE MORE DETAIL ABOUT WHAT WAS GOING ON COULD HAVE BEEN IN THERE OTHER THAN THEY'RE TRYING AND I JUST READ IT AGAIN.
THEY'RE TRYING TO CIRCUMVENT THE RULE.
IT'S NOT REALLY WHAT'S GOING ON.
I HAVEN'T, I HAVEN'T THAT, THAT WAS NOT THE INTENT OF THE REPORT.
IT WAS JUST CLARIFYING WHAT WAS WRITTEN IN THE APPLICATION.
BUT IT, IT DIDN'T GIMME ANY INFORMATION TO BASE MY DECISION ON.
I'M JUST TELLING YOU WHAT I THOUGHT, BUT DON'T THINK, YOU KNOW, YOU GUYS ALWAYS DO A GREAT JOB.
I JUST, ON THIS ONE, IT WAS JUST REALLY WEIRD FOR ME.
SO PUTTING THAT OUT THERE, I HAVE A, I'LL TAKE THAT TO HEART.
COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT KIND OF STRUCTURES THERE'LL BE? WILL IT BE SOMETHING THAT, IS THAT BLENDS IN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR ARE THEY JUST GONNA BE BIG UGLY MIDDLE BUILDINGS? MA'AM, I'M HOPING THEY WON'T BE BIG UGLY METAL BUILDINGS.
UM, I, I'M, WE'VE GOTTEN EXCELLENT ARCHITECT, UH, THAT WE'RE COMMUNICATING WITH AND UM, I THINK HE'S, WE'RE ALL AESTHETICALLY ORIENTED.
I WANT PEOPLE THAT COME THERE TO, YOU KNOW, NOT GET THAT INDUSTRIAL VIBE.
SO THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING WE'RE GONNA TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION.
MAKE IT AS APPEALING AS POSSIBLE.
SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE METAL BUILDINGS I ASSUME? UM, I WISH I HAD THE EXPERTISE TO, TO TELL YOU.
[01:00:01]
A RANGE OF OPTIONS THAT INCLUDE LIKE PREFABRICATED, UM, STRUCTURES TO, UH, ACTUAL DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT WE COULD USE TO ACCOMMODATE LIKE THE HEIGHTS FOR PADDLE BALL QUARTS VERSUS PICKLEBALL QUARTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.I'M NOT SURE IF THERE'S PREFAB BUILDINGS FOR THAT.
SO, UH, I JUST DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFO TO GIVE YOU AN ACCURATE ANSWER.
I'M SORRY, I I CAN ELABORATE JUST A LITTLE BIT TO, NOT ON NECESSARILY MATERIALS, BUT YOU KNOW, YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT THEY WOULD SEE.
UM, SO I DON'T THINK ANYTHING WILL BE VISIBLE FROM HEATH ROAD
UM, BUT NEIGHBORS THAT BACK UP TO THE PROPERTY, I MEAN THE GOAL WOULD BE THAT THERE'S A LARGE ENOUGH LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND THEN THESE ARE TECHNICALLY ONE STORY STRUCTURES JUST TALLER ONE STORY.
SO IT, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S NOT EVEN AS TALL AS A TWO STORY HOUSE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
UH, CAN THE ZONING COMMISSION IMPOSE ANY SORT OF CONDITIONS OR CITY COUNCIL THAT WOULD HELP US LOSE, UH, ANY HEARTBURN OVER THIS? NO, THEY CANNOT.
IF, SORRY, IF THEY WERE TO ASK FOR A CONDITIONAL USE OR A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION, WE COULD LOOK AT CONDITIONS, BUT THAT IS NOT THE CASE.
WELL, EXCEPT FOR NA AND R OR NOT EVEN R EXCEPT FOR NA, WHICH THEY'VE ALREADY, WELL THEY ARE REQUESTING THE NA SO THAT MEANS THEY CAN'T HAVE ALCOHOL SALES THERE.
QUESTION ON, FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA, WHEN THE DEVELOPER WOULD DECIDE TO MAKE SWIMMING POOL, TENNIS COURT, BASKETBALL COURT AND A BUILDING, DOES THIS SPECIFIC LOCATION WOULD HAVE A, A DIFFERENT LAND USE OR A ZONING USE DIFFERENT THAN THE RESIDENTIALS NEARBY? I'M SORRY, WHAT I MEANT THEY ARE REQUESTING A DIFFERENT LAND USE, SO YES.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WERE ASKING? NO, I'M ASKING WOULD WOULD THE DEVELOP, WOULD THE DEVELOPER WOULD NEED AT THIS POINT THIS TO BE ZONING DIFFERENTLY THAN THE RESIDENTIAL IS NEARBY? IT IS, IT IS CURRENTLY DIFFERENT.
IT'S ZONED COMMERCIAL RIGHT NOW.
SO AGAIN, THEY'RE UPDATING, THEY'RE REQUESTING THE C TWO SO THEY CAN REARRANGE THE UM, THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M ASKING.
ARE YOU TRYING TO CLARIFY IT? IF, IF A, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WAS COMING IN AND WANTED TO BUILD A AN AMENITY CENTER CORRECT.
THAT WOULD FALL UNDER RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
SO IT WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE REZONED? YEAH, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE REZONED.
IF IT'S SOME KIND OF RESIDENTIAL USE, IT IS ZONED COMMERCIAL, LIKE COMMERCIAL RIGHT NOW.
SO ANYTIME A LIKE A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION COMES IN AND THERE'S AN AMENITY CENTER OR A PARK INCLUDED WITHIN THAT PLAT, IT IS THE SAME ZONING AS WHAT IT, THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING IS.
SO IF THEY WOULD ASK, IT'S JUST DESIGNATED AS PARK SPACE.
IF THEY WOULD ASK TO MAKE THE BUILDING LARGER THAN THE SIZE THAT ALLOWED BY C ONE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS OF C TWO OR COM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MAKE IT A BIGGER BUILDING AND FALL THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS.
HAS THE MAXIMUM OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ONE BUILDING, 15,000 FOR UP TO MULTIPLE BUILDINGS.
SO THEY EITHER HAVE TO REZONE OR AS ORIENT WAS REQUESTING OR ASKED AND INQUIRED, THEY COULD GO TO BE OA AND REQUEST A VARIANCE FROM THAT PIECE OF CODE.
I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE ASKING.
UM, LIKE THE, I BELIEVE MISTY OAKS HAS A COMMUNITY CENTER THAT'S ZONED RESIDENTIAL.
MM-HMM
LIKE A NEIGHBORHOOD DOESN'T HAVE THAT AND YOU CAN DO IT IN AN R SIX ZONING IF IT'S ASSOCIATED WITH A NEIGHBORHOOD.
ONLY IF IT'S ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECT.
THIS PARTICULAR ONE IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
AND WE, AND WE HOPE THAT THE NEIGHBORS ARE MEMBERS.
I MEAN THAT'S THE IDEA IS THAT IT'S AMENITY FOR THE COMMUNITY.
ALRIGHT, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MATT? WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
WE HAVE A MOTION, UH, BY COMMISSIONER COOPER FOR APPROVAL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIEGEL.
WOULD STAFF PLEASE DO A ROLL CALL? VOTE.
UH, I THINK THAT IS FINALLY MR. CHAIR A QUICK POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE.
[01:05:01]
SURE.'CAUSE I WASN'T ABLE TO GIVE HIM A HARD TIME AT ZONING 'CAUSE I FORGOT.
UH, THIS IS AR GOMEZ'S LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND HIS LAST ZONING COMMISSION MEETING WAS LAST WEEK.
SO I WANT TO THANK HIM FOR HIS WORK.
UH, UNFORTUNATELY HE WILL BE LEAVING DSD, CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.
AND WHERE ARE YOU GOING? ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
WELL HE'S STAYING WITH OUR CITY BUT HE IS LEAVING US.
SO GOOD LUCK TO RAIO AND THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR WORK.
AND DON'T, DON'T USE THE WORD CIRCUMVENTING ANYMORE.
UH, WE HAVE MADE IT THROUGH THE AGENDA.
IS THERE A, UH, DIRECTOR'S REPORT? THERE IS NOT.
WELL IT IS THREE 17 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.