[00:00:07]
GOOD AFTERNOON, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
MY NAME IS JOY MCGEE AND I AM THE CHAIRWOMAN OF THE ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, AS WELL AS THE DISTRICT THREE ZONING COMMISSIONER.
I HEREBY CALL THIS REGULARLY NOTICED MEETING OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ZONING COMMISSION INTO SESSION.
MAY WE PLEASE HAVE OUR INTERPRETERS READ THE INTERPRETATION SERVICES AVAILABLE FOR THIS MEETING? YOU THERE? OH, I THINK YOU'RE MUTED.
UH, MICHAEL, CAN YOU TRY TO UNMUTE HER? SORRY, WE'RE HAVING, OKAY.
MAY YOU PLEASE CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL.
[Roll Call]
COMMISSIONER GREATHOUSE.COMMISSIONER GIBBONS? PRESENT.
PRESENT SANS AVA AND CHAIRMAN MCGEE.
UH, PRIOR TO STARTING WITH OUR ITEMS, WOULD YOU PLEASE REVIEW THIS MEETING FORMAT TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE PUBLIC AND LIMIT THE POTENTIAL SPREAD OF COVID 19.
THE ZONING COMMISSION IS HOLDING MEETINGS VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE.
THESE MEETING STANDARDS ARE BASED UPON THE VARIOUS SUSPENDED PROVISIONS OF THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT ISSUED BY THE TEXAS GOVERNOR IN RESPONSE TO THE C 19 CRISIS AND ARE IN PLACE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN WATCH AND LISTEN TO THIS MEETING BY VISITING WWW SAN ANTONIO DOV SLASH DSV OR BY CALLING IN FOR AUDIO ONLY AT 2 1 0 2 0 6 5 4 8 3.
TO INCORPORATE PUBLIC COMMENTS, THERE ARE FOUR OPPORTUNITIES.
THESE INCLUDE EMAIL OR MAIL COMMENTS, DROPPING OFF COMMENTS, LEAVING VOICEMAIL, OR ASKING TO BE CALLED DURING THE MEETING.
STATEMENTS OR COMMENTS RECEIVED ARE PART OF THE OFFICIAL WRITTEN RECORD FOR ITEMS ON INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT.
STAFF WILL READ INTO THE RECORD IF ASKED ANY EMAILS OR LETTERS RECEIVED, AND STAFF WILL ALSO PLAY ANY MESSAGES RECEIVED BY VOICEMAIL.
LASTLY, FOR THOSE THAT SIGNED UP TO RECEIVE A CALLBACK, WE WILL CALL THEM TO STATE THEIR TWO MINUTE COMMENTS.
SPANISH INTERPRETERS ARE ON STANDBY AS NEEDED.
THE APPLICANT WILL THEN BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL WITH A TWO MINUTE TIME LIMIT ALONG WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS COMMISSION QUESTIONS.
[1. 20-5382 (WITHDRAWN)(Continued from 09/01/2020) ZONING CASE Z-2020-10700172 S (Council District 1)]
REVIEW THE CURRENT LIST OF CONSENT, UM, ITEMS AND ANY POSTPONED OR WITHDRAWN ITEMS? YES, MA'AM.THE ITEMS TODAY THAT WERE WITHDRAWN ARE ITEMS NUMBER ONE AND ITEMS NUMBER FIVE, AND JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THOSE LISTENING LIVE.
FREDERICKSBURG ROAD THAT IS WITHDRAWN WILL NOT BE HEARD TODAY.
ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS AT GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 11,000 BLOCK OF BANDERA ROAD.
WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT THEY WERE TAKEN OUT OF THE CYCLE IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD, THEY WOULD START ALL OVER AGAIN.
THE ITEMS THAT ARE ON COMBINED HEARING NUMBER ONE ARE ITEM SIX AT 57 10 MC DAVITT, ROAD ITEM SEVEN AT 91 14 NORTHEAST LOOP FOUR 10, ITEM EIGHT AT 39 26 SOUTHWEST MILITARY DRIVE, ITEM NINE AT 5 42 AND 6 0 2 EVEREST
[00:05:01]
AVENUE, AS WELL AS IN THE 530 BLOCK OF EVEREST AVENUE.ITEM 10 AT 1 34 10 QUISENBERRY ROAD, ITEM 11 AT ONE 15 DAVIS COURT.
ITEM 12, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE TEN FIVE HUNDRED BLOCKS OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 51 AND ITEM NUMBER 14, WHICH IS MULTIPLE ADDRESSES.
THAT IS THE BROOKS REGIONAL AREA REZONING.
DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WANNA ADD ANY OF THESE CONSENT ITEMS TO INDIVIDUAL? OKAY.
WOULD YOU PLEASE READ THE REMAINING CONSENT ITEMS INTO THE RECORD, PLEASE? OKAY.
[Items 6 - 12 & 14]
THAT MEAN YOU'RE READY TO READ THOSE ITEMS INTO THE RECORD? YES.FOR SIX IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R SIX TO R FOUR.
ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
LOCATED AT 57 10 MC DAVITT ROAD, THERE WERE 25 NOTICES MAILED ONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION.
ONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR OUTSIDE THE 200 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA AND NO RESPONSE FROM CABLE WESTWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C THREE NA TO C THREE N A S WITH ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
AND A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR TRUCK REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE LOCATED AT 91 14 NORTHEAST LOOP FOUR 10.
FIVE IN OPPOSITION, THREE IN OPPOSITION OUTSIDE OF THE 200 FEET.
IN FAVOR OUTSIDE THE 200 FEET AND EAST GATE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS OPPOSED.
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C TWO TO C ONE CD WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR MOTOR VEHICLE CELLS.
ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME AT 39 26 SOUTHWEST MILITARY DRIVE.
THERE WERE 22 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION, AND NO RESPONSE FROM ANA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION.
ITEM NUMBER NINE, REQUEST TO REZONED FROM R FIVE A H O D, THE C TWO C D A H O D WITH CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONSTRUCTION TRADES CONTRACTOR LOCATED AT 5 42 AND 6 0 2 EVEREST AVENUE AND IN THE 530 BLOCK OF EVEREST AVENUE, THERE WERE 22 NOTICES MAILED NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR TO AN OPPOSITION AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
ITEM NUMBER 10, A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C TWO TO M H C.
ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
AT 1 34 10 PLEASE AND BERRY ROAD, THERE WERE 11 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION, AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
ITEM NUMBER 11, A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R FOUR H L TO R FOUR C D H L WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A NON-COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT.
ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
AT ONE 15 DAVIS COURT THERE WERE 20 NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION.
MANKEY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS NOT OPPOSED.
ITEM NUMBER 12, REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C THREE GC TWO TO C TWO F GC.
TWO WITH SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR A SOLAR FARM.
EXCUSE ME, THAT IS A C THREE S GC TWO WITH A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR A SOLAR FARM AT IN THE TEN FIVE HUNDRED BLOCKS OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 51.
THERE WERE FOUR NOTICES MAILED, NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION, AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
AND THEN ITEM NUMBER 14 IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R FOUR MF 25, MF 33 0 1, 0 2 C TWO C THREE C THREE R AND I ONE WITH ALL OVERLAYS TO R FOUR R 5 0 1.
C ONE C ONE SS WITH SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR A BAR AND OR TAVERN WITHOUT COVER CHARGE THREE OR MORE DAYS PER WEEK AND C TWO WITH ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME, LOCATED AT MULTIPLE ADDRESSES BETWEEN AND ON THE 3,100 TO 3,300 BLOCKS OF CLARK AVENUE, 3,600 TO 4,000 BLOCKS OF BRENNAN AVENUE.
[00:10:01]
BLOCK OF EAST SOUTH CROSS BOULEVARD, 4,700 BLOCK OF PECAN VALLEY DRIVE.9,000 TO 9,200 BLOCKS OF MISSION BROOK, 2,400 BLOCKS OF MISSION VISTA AND THE 8,900 BLOCK OF MISSION TOP MADAM CHAIR.
THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR A MOTION.
MADAM CHAIR, THIS IS COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.
I MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEMS 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 14.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER BUSTAMONTE.
WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SIPES.
LET'S, UM, BEGIN WITH OUR INDIVIDUAL HEARING ITEMS PLEASE.
[2. 20-5352 ZONING CASE Z-2020-10700128 ERZD (Council District 9)]
THE FIRST ITEM FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION IS ITEM NUMBER TWO.ITEM NUMBER TWO IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C THREE TO C THREE S WITH SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR A CAR WASH WITH ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
LOCATED AT 1 8 5 3 5 US HIGHWAY 2 81 NORTH.
THERE WERE SIX NOTICES MAILED AND RECEIVED IN FAVOR.
AND THERE'S NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
STAFF DOES NOT FIND EVIDENCE OF LIKELY AS ADVERSE IMPACTS ON NEIGHBORING LANDS IN RELATION TO THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST ARE ALSO C THREE.
THE PROPOSED S WOULD ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION OF A CAR WASH.
MAY WE HAVE THE APPLICANT PLEASE? COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS JOHANN ANI.
YOU FEEL FREE TO PRESENT YOUR CASE, SIR.
UH, WE ARE PROPOSING A TUNNEL CAR WASH WHERE CUSTOMERS STAY IN THE CAR AND GO THROUGH AN AUTOMATIC TUNNEL AND WE'LL HAVE SELF-SERVICE VACUUMS. UH, WE WILL BE RECLAIMING MORE THAN 80% OF OUR WATER.
UM, WE WILL HAVE A INTERCEPTOR INSTALLED IN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS WHERE HEAVY SAWS WILL BE CAPTURED.
UH, THE CHEMICALS THAT WE WILL BE USING ARE WATER-BASED BIODEGRADABLE, AND WE WORK WITH ALL OF THESE ITEMS, UH, WITH SAWS, UH, TO GET THEIR, UH, RECOMMENDATION ON APPROVAL.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
IS THAT FAIR? AND MY APOLOGIES.
UH, THIS IS, THIS IS MICHAEL SANTE WITH SA FOR PROTECTION AND EVALUATION.
UH, WE HAVE REVIEWED THE ZONING APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CAR WASH FACILITY AT 18,535 US HIGHWAY 2 81 NORTH.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY AN EXISTING SONIC DRIVING RESTAURANT OPERATING ON 0.775 ACRES.
THE EXISTING 85% PRODUCE COVER WILL NOT INCREASE OVER THE 0.775 ACRE LOT.
THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO REUSE 80% OF WASH WATER, PARTICIPATE IN THE SAWS CONSERVATION WATER SAVER CAR WASH PROGRAM, AND ADHERE TO ALL OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE SAWS, UH, REPORT.
WE THEREFORE RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE AUTOMATIC CAR CARWASH FACILITY.
STAFF, IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO, MA'AM.
[00:15:01]
I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.UH, I'LL OPEN IT TO, TO OTHER COMMISSIONERS.
UM, ANY COMMISSIONERS WITH QUESTIONS? OKAY.
I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF CASE NUMBER ITEM NUMBER TWO, UH, INCLUDING THE SOS REPORT.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER GIBBONS WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER JONES.
SEEING NO DISCUSSION, ROLL CALL, VOTE PLEASE.
[3. 20-5286 ZONING CASE Z-2020-10700180 CD ERZD (Council District 8)]
ITEM NUMBER THREE IS THE REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C THREE UC.ONE TO C THREE CD E R Z D FOR, UH, WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR COFFEE ROASTING AND C THREE CD U UC.
ONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE FOR COPY ROASTING.
ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME AT 49 49 NORTH LOOP 1604 WEST.
THERE WERE THREE NOTICES MAILED.
ONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THE CURRENT C THREE BASE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THE PROPOSED C THREE CD MAINTAINS THE BASE AND THE CONDITIONAL USE ALLOWS FOR A COFFEE ROASTING FACILITY WITH ANY NECESSARY CONDITIONS.
THIS SECTION OF THE I H 10 FM 1604 URBAN CORRIDOR HAS NUMEROUS VACANT LOTS AND IS LACKING A BUSINESS.
THEREFORE, THE AREA WILL BENEFIT FROM THE PROPOSED ZONING CONSIDERING IT WILL UTILIZE A CURRENTLY ABANDONED BUILDING.
MADAM CHAIR, WE DO HAVE SAS ON THE LINE FOR THE SAS REPORT.
THE SAS REPRESENTATIVE, PLEASE? YES.
UH, MICHAEL SANTE WITH SAS FOR PROTECTION AND EVALUATION SECTION.
WE HAVE REVIEWED THE ZONING APPLICATION TO ALLOW A COFFEE ROASTING FACILITY LOCATED AT 49 49 NORTH LOOP 1604 WEST.
THE SITE IS, IS AN EXISTING 30 2051 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING BUILT IN 2016.
THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 6,521 SQUARE FEET LIES WITHIN THE EDWARDS FER RECHARGE ZONE AND THE REMAINDER OF THE 25,530 SQUARE FOOT, UH, BUILDING IS IN THE CONTRIBUTING WITHIN TRANSITION ZONE.
THE IMPERVIOUS COVER WILL NOT INCREASE THE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVER, UH, ON THE RECHARGE ZONE.
SOS RECOMMENDS APPROVAL FOR ZONING CASE.
MAY WE HAVE THE APPLICANT PLEASE? BROWN ORTIZ.
HELLO, THIS IS JAMES MCKNIGHT, BROWN ORTIZ 1 1 2 EAST PEON.
UM, YEAH, THIS IS A, UM, ARIZONA CASE IS JUST FOR AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING.
IT WAS BUILT IN 2016, ABOUT A 32,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING.
THE, THE COFFEE COMPANY THAT IS OPERATING NOW CURRENTLY HAS A ROASTING FACILITY FOR ITS BEANS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN ANTONIO.
AND THEY'RE JUST MOVING THAT POR PORTION OF THAT UP TO THIS BUILDING HERE.
SO, UM, UNFORTUNATELY COFFEE ROASTING IS NOT A A C THREE USE, SO WE HAD TO HAVE A SPECIFIC USE FOR THIS COFFEE ROASTING.
BUT, UH, IT'S JUST TAKEN A PORTION OF THE BUILDING.
THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS HERE.
SO WE'RE JUST USING AN EXISTING BUILDING IN EXISTING SITE AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
STEPH, IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO, MA'AM.
ANY COMMISSIONERS WITH QUESTIONS?
[00:20:01]
COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? I DID NOT.WILL THERE BE CONSUMPTION ON SITE? NO, MA'AM.
THIS IS JUST FOR ROASTING OF THE COFFEE BEANS, HAVING 'EM BAGGED AND THEN SENT OFF.
SO NO, UH, PUBLIC, UH, PURCHASES OF THAT? THERE IT IS.
UH, PUBLIC CONSUMPTION ON SITE.
COMMISSIONER BOOSTER MONTE, UH, I GUESS THIS IS KIND OF MORE OF A COMMENT, BUT, UH, MR. MCKNIGHT, THEY'RE GONNA MOVE FROM FIVE BLOCKS NORTH OF ME TO THE NORTH SIDE NOW, SO I WON'T GET TO SMELL THE COFFEE ROASTING ANYMORE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, COMMISSIONER ROMERO.
UH, I GREW UP NEXT TO THE MELITA COFFEE PLANT IN NEW JERSEY, AND I GOT VERY USED TO THAT SMELL EVERY DAY.
UM, SO, UH, THERE, THERE IS NO CHANGE IN IMPERVIOUS COVER HERE AND THERE ACTUALLY ARE NO SAWS CONDITIONS.
SO I, FOR I WILL MOVE FOR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR ITEM NUMBER THREE, SECOND MCDANIEL.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER ROMERO WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL.
ANY COMMENT? OUR DISCUSSION? OKAY.
[4. 20-5134 (Continued from 08/18/2020) ZONING CASE Z-2020-10700158 CD (Council District 4)]
AS THE REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R SIX TO R SIX CD WITH CONDITIONAL USE FOR TWO DWELLING UNITS.ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.
AT 3 34 ALTITUDE, THERE WERE 22 NOTICES MAILED NONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR.
RECEIVED AN OPPOSITION, TWO RECEIVED AN OPPOSITION OUTSIDE 200 FEET AND LACKLAND TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS OPPOSED.
THE PROPOSED R SIX C D MAINTAINS THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT AND IS APPROPRIATE ZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY AS IT IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO OTHER R SIX ZONE PROPERTIES.
THE CONDITIONAL USE ALLOWS CONSIDERATION OF TWO DWELLING UNITS ON THE PROPERTY.
MAY WE HAVE THE APPLICANT PLEASE? YES, I'M HERE.
UH, BOBBY RERA, 9 0 0 6 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
YOU COULD PRESENT YOUR CASE, SIR.
UM, WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE CONTINUANCE FROM LAST TIME.
AND BASICALLY WHAT I DID, I WENT OUT THERE, UH, I, I I LOOKED AT EVERYTHING INSIDE THAT WAS ON SITE.
AND BASICALLY WHAT AGAIN, UM, THE PEOPLE ARE STILL BELIEVE THAT IT'S A, IT'S AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.
IT'S NOT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.
IT'S GONNA BE, UH, TOWNHOUSES.
THERE'S GONNA BE TWO TOWNHOUSES.
UH, WE'VE ALREADY HAD ONE, ONE APPLICANT THAT'S GONNA PURCHASE ONE TOWNHOUSE AND THEIR RETIRED, IT'S A RETIRED COUPLE THAT GAVE THEIR HOME TO THEIR CHILDREN AND THEY'RE GONNA LIVE IN THE DUPLEX THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY'RE, THEY DON'T WANNA DEAL WITH THE CUTTING OF THE GRASS AND ALL THAT OTHER STUFF.
SO THEY'RE ONE OF THE APPLICANTS THAT ARE WILLING TO PURCHASE ONE OF THE UNITS ALREADY.
THAT'S GONNA BE THEIR RETIREMENT, QUOTE UNQUOTE, THEIR RETIREMENT PLACE TO LIVE AT.
AND I JUST FEEL THAT PEOPLE HAVE, HAVE MISCON.
OH, WELL, BASICALLY BOTTOM LINE, IT'S NOT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX, IT'S A TOWNHOUSE.
AND LIKE I SAID, UM, WE ALREADY HAVE
[00:25:01]
ONE RETIRED COUPLE THAT'S GONNA PURCHASE ONE OF 'EM IF BUILT.AND I AM ASKING, UH, ZONING TO PLEASE ACCEPT THIS THE WAY IT IS.
UH, AS FAR AS, UH, MEETS AND BOUNDS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PLACE.
UH, PARKING PARKING'S NOT GONNA BE AN ISSUE EITHER.
UH, AND AS FAR AS MISS, UH, FROM THE LAST MEETING THAT WE HAD, THE DRIVEWAY OF THE OWNER THAT LIVES NEXT DOOR, HE WAS THINKING THAT THEY WERE ACTUALLY GONNA PARK NEXT TO HIM.
AND THAT IS NOT TRUE ON EITHER.
UH, AGAIN, UM, WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR APPROVAL FROM COUNSEL.
UM, STAFF, IS THERE A PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, MA'AM.
WE HAVE TWO VOICEMAILS TO PLAY.
UM, AND, AND, UM, SIR, YOU, YOU'RE, YOU'RE WELCOME TO, UH, HAVE A CHANCE TO RESPOND AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT.
OKAY? LET'S GO WITH THE PUBLIC COMMENT PLEASE.
PHONE NUMBER TWO TEN SIX SEVEN FOUR TWENTY ONE.
CASE NUMBER TWO Z 20 21 0 7 0 0 1 5 8.
THE REASON I'M CALLING IS FOR THE, UH, REZONING OPTIONS.
DRINKING ABOUT MUSIC, NOT, NOT ENOUGH PARKING AND FIGHTING.
CASE NUMBER Z DO 2020 DO 1 0 7 1 5 8.
I AM CALLING IN OPPOSITION OF A REZONING OF 3 3 4 ALTITUDE DRIVE.
ONE OF MY MAIN CONCERNS IS THE PAR PARKING PROBLEM THAT WILL BE INVOLVED.
I'VE LIVED HERE FOR 25 YEARS AND HAS SEEN THIS PROBLEM ARISE OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
THE LOCK CANNOT ACCOMMODATE A DWELLING FOR TWO FAMILIES NOR TWO SEPARATE DWELLINGS.
MR. RA WILL NOT RESIDE THAT THE ADDRESSING QUESTION.
THEREFORE, HE DOES NOT KNOW NO NOR WILL HE KNOW ABOUT THE PROBLEMS I FORESEE.
DO NOT ALLOW A BUSINESSMAN LIKE HIM TO ONLY CONCENTRATE ON THE MONEY HE WILL PROFIT AND NOT CARE ABOUT THE LATEST LIKE MYSELF THAT WILL SUFFER BY HIS REQUEST.
I PLEAD WITH YOU TO PLEASE PUT YOURSELF IN MY SHOES AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND MY POINT OF VIEW.
MOST HOMES ON THIS STREET ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOME DWELLINGS.
WHY MUST WE CHANGE THIS NOW? A LOT THAT DO HAVE MULTIPLE HOMES ARE GRANDFATHERED IN AND STILL THE OWNERS ARE NOT HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UPKEEP OF THIS HOME.
THIS MAY BE A
IF THERE WAS AN EMPTY LOT NEXT TO YOUR HOME AND I CAME AND WANTED TO BUILD TWO DWELL IN ONE LOT, WOULD YOU BE OKAY WITH THAT? THANK YOU.
OH, MR. HERTA, YOU STILL THERE? YES, WE'RE STILL HERE.
SO THAT WAS ALL OF THE LIVE PUBLIC COMMENT CHAIR.
DID YOU, WOULD YOU LIKE TIME TO RESPOND MR. HERRERA? YES.
UH, ON THE FIRST ONE, UH, AND I UNDERSTAND THEIR CONCERNS, BUT YOU KNOW, WHEN A RETIRED COUPLE MOVES IN, I DON'T THINK THAT, DON'T THINK THAT IT, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, A RETIRED COUPLE WILL BE MOVING IN AND I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GONNA BE DOING WHAT THEY'RE SAYING.
DRINKING LOUD MUSIC AND, AND PARK AS FAR AS PARKING.
THERE'S NO ISSUE WITH THE PARKING EITHER BECAUSE THE PARKING IS THERE ALREADY.
[00:30:01]
GONNA BE IN BACK, NOT IN FRONT.AND I TOTALLY, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND ABOUT THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT, UH, ON WHAT THE SECOND INDIVIDUAL WAS SAYING.
YOU KNOW, ANYBODY, EVERY, ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH THEIR HOMES.
UM, THERE'S HOMES RIGHT NOW THAT ARE SPLIT INTO DUPLEXES AND, AND THEY'RE BEING RENTED OUT, UH, AS FAR AS THAT'S CONCERNED.
BUT YET THESE ARE NOT GONNA BE RENTED OUT.
THEY'RE GONNA BE PAID INDIVIDUALS.
THEY'RE GONNA PAY FOR THE CONDO ITSELF OR THE TOWNHOUSE.
UM, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE STAFF.
I THINK WE HAD A FEW MORE WRITTEN OPPOSITION COMMENT, UH, FROM THE LAST HEARING.
UM, IS THAT TRUE? OR PLUS THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAD WRITTEN A LETTER THAT THEY WERE
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
UM, SIR, HAVE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, UH, MEMBERS OR AT LEAST TALK TO THEM AT THIS POINT IN TIME? NO, BECAUSE THEIR NEXT MEETING IS, UH, NEXT WEEK, I BELIEVE.
UH, THEY ONLY MEET EVERY SO OFTEN, BUT I DID GO TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I DID KNOCK ON A COUPLE OF DOORS AND, AND I EXPLAINED THE SITUATION TO THEM.
THEY SAID THEY HAD NO WORRIES ABOUT IT.
BUT AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN OPPOSITION, YOU KNOW, I, I CAN'T CHANGE THEIR MINDS.
I, YOU KNOW, ONCE EVERYBODY'S THERE, AS FAR AS THE OP OPPOSITION, PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED, THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO SPEAK ON, ON, ON THEIR BEHALF AS FAR AS WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE AND SHOULDN'T BE.
I MEAN, I'M NOT AGAINST EITHER ONE, BUT THEY STILL HAVE TO UNDERSTAND IT'S NOT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.
IT'S A TOWNHOUSE, TWO TOWNHOUSES THAT ARE FOR SALE.
AND LIKE I SAID, ON THE FIRST, ON THE OPPOSITE TOWARDS, UH, FACING ALTITUDE ROAD TO THE LEFT, UH, WE ALREADY HAVE, UH, PEOPLE IN MIND THAT WANNA PURCHASE THE FIRST ONE THAT'S, THAT'S GONNA COME UP.
LET ME, LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE RE IT'S A RETIRED COUPLE.
LET ME ASK YOU ANOTHER QUESTION, SIR.
UH, SO OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE, UH, A POTENTIAL BUYER EVEN BEFORE YOU BUILD, WHICH IS, WHICH IS A GOOD THING FOR A, UH, BUSINESSMAN WHO DEVELOPING A, UH, FOR SALE HOME? UH, SEE IN THIS WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD YOU HAVE PRETTY MUCH SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING ON OUR SIX LOT, UH, BUILDING, UH, TWO HOMES ON A SINGLE LOT HAS TAKEN OPPOSITION FROM ALL THE NEIGHBORS, MAYBE ONE OF THEM.
WOULD YOU CONSIDER BUILDING A SINGLE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY ONE HOME ON THIS R SIX LOT? TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THAT PARTICULAR AREA, IT'S SINGLE FAMILY HOMES? YES.
MULTIPLE, MULTIPLE, UH, MULTIPLE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES? YES.
AND I, AND I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT.
BUT LIKE I SAID, LIKE I MENTIONED IT IS, UH, R SIX RIGHT NOW, UH, BASICALLY WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY IS JUST BUILD TWO CONDO TOWN HOMES, NOT APARTMENT COMPLEXES.
THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE RENTED OUT.
UM, I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, PASS THE, UH, UM, DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS TO OTHER COMMISSIONERS, UH, PLEASE.
ANY, UH, COMMISSIONERS WITH QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER BUSING.
THANK YOU MADAM SHARON, FOR THE APPLICANT, IT'S LOOKING LIKE ON THIS BLOCK ON THE SAME SIDE, THERE ARE APARTMENT BUILDINGS, IS THAT CORRECT? THE WINFIELD APARTMENTS, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT'S DOWN, THAT'S DOWN THE ROAD.
[00:35:01]
OR WOODFIELD, I'M SORRY, I CAN'T APPARENTLY READ.AND FOR STAFF, UM, YOU KNOW, IF THIS PROPERTY WERE TO BE LEFT AS R SIX AND IF IT WAS OWNER OCCUPIED, THERE COULD IN FACT BE TWO HOUSEHOLDS ON THIS PROPERTY, IS THAT CORRECT? YES, THERE CAN BE TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IF IT'S OWNER OCCUPIED.
AND IF THAT WERE TRUE, THERE WOULDN'T BE A REQUIREMENT FOR THE SIX PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ALLOTTED IN THE SITE PLAN RESTRICT OUTSIDE? THAT'S CORRECT.
SO EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE TWO HOUSEHOLDS, THE ALL AND AND HOUSEHOLD, THAT WAS A COMMENT, NOT A QUESTION, SORRY.
OH, COMMISSIONER YOU PUT OUT, YOU MIGHT WANNA REPEAT WHAT YOU SAID, YOU, YOUR
SO I SAID, EVEN THOUGH, YOU KNOW, IF IT WERE LEFT AS IS AND IT WERE OWNER OCCUPIED, WE WOULDN'T GET THE BENEFIT OF THE SIX PARKING LOTS THAT ARE IN THE SITE PLAN CURRENTLY.
AND THAT WAS REALLY MORE OF A COMMENT THAN A QUESTION.
UM, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM ANY COMMISSIONERS? OKAY.
UM, COMMISSIONER KAMATH, AND YOU'RE MUTED.
I THINK COMMISSIONER GIBBONS HAD SOME QUESTIONS.
DID, DID I MISS YOUR HAND? OKAY, COMMISSIONER GIBBONS.
WELL, I DID APPRECIATE COMMISSIONER BUS'S.
UM, THOUGHT, AND THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
SO ARE WE REZONING FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PARKING LOT OR THE PARKING SPACES? SO THE APPLICANT? YES, BECAUSE IF YOU NOTICE, EVEN, EVEN IN CERTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS, EVEN IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT NOW, UH, ON PETRAN, RICHLAND HILLS, HAVE YOU NOTICED THESE ARE ALL MULTI-FAMILY LIVING AREAS OVER HERE.
BUT ONCE YOU GET, UH, A DAUGHTER MOVING IN OR A SON MOVING IN, IF YOU NOTICE A LOT OF, A LOT OF VEHICLES ARE PARKED OUT OUTSIDE THE DRIVEWAYS BECAUSE THE DRIVEWAYS CANNOT ACCOMMODATE, YOU KNOW, FOUR VEHICLES.
SO THEY'RE PARKED OUT IN THE STREETS THEMSELVES.
BUT OVER HERE ON ALTITUDE, IT'S NOT GONNA BE LIKE THAT.
THESE PEOPLE ARE GONNA HAVE THEIR OWN PARKING FACES IN THE REAR.
SO THAT ANSWERED THAT QUESTION.
AND, UH, IS THIS FENCED IN? WILL YOU BE FENCING THIS LOT IN, UH, OR PARTICULARLY THE, THE FENCE ON THE EAST SIDE, THE, WHERE THE PARKING IS? DEFINITELY.
AND WHAT KIND OF, IS THAT A, WILL THAT BE A PICKET FENCE? FENCE? I'M SORRY.
UH, FOR THE, UM, FOR THE APPLICANT, UM, WHEN YOU PASS BY ON ALTITUDE STREET, FROM WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING, IT'LL LOOK LIKE IT'S JUST ONE HOUSE THERE ANYWAY.
IS THAT CORRECT? I I, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION.
WHEN YOU PA WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PROPERTY, IF, IF ONCE IT'S DONE, YOU WON'T KNOW THAT IT'S A SECOND, UH, A CONDO OR, OR TOWNHOUSE BACK THERE WHERE YOU, WHEN YOU PASS BY, DOESN'T IT JUST LOOK LIKE ONE TOWNHOUSE? YES, THAT IS CORRECT.
I, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, COMMISSIONER KAMATH? YEAH.
UH, THIS IS A, UH, DIFFICULT, UH, CASE FOR ME, UH, ON THE DISTRICT, UH, IN OUR DISTRICT BECAUSE WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS NOTHING BUT R SIX WITH A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS.
[00:40:01]
THEY HAVE HAD A, UH, SERIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ONE APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT HAS BEEN THERE.AND, UH, THERE, WELL, THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD IS JUST UP AND ON.
THEY REALLY DO NOT WANT TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING IN EACH OF THESE LOTS.
AND, UH, I BELIEVE THAT THIS ONE DOESN'T FIT THE, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD.
SO I'M, UM, UH, I, I'M, UH, I I'M RECOMMENDING I'M MOVING THE, I'M, I'M MORE TO RECOMMEND FOR DENIAL OF THIS, UH, REZONING APPLICATION.
IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL PROVIDE THE SECOND FOR DISCUSSION.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL.
I MEAN, I'M SORRY, COMMISSIONER KAMATH WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL.
UH, COMMISSIONER GIBBONS? UM, I'M NOT QUITE SURE I UNDERSTOOD COMMISSIONER CA KAME YOUR CONCERN.
UM, IT SEEMS LIKE THE STREET HAS A VARIETY OF MO UH, MOBILE HOMES, APARTMENTS, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
I THINK IT STAYS WITHIN THE, REALLY THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED.
UM, OTHER THAN REMOVING THAT PARKING IN THE FRONT TO THE BACK, WHICH, UH, DOES ELIMINATE A LITTLE BIT OF A EYESORE THAT CARS CAN BE, OR NOISE, I SUPPOSE.
COULD YOU CLARIFY, UH, AGAIN, WHAT YOUR CONCERN IS THAT I COULD UNDERSTAND YOUR MOTION A LITTLE BIT BETTER? IS THAT OKAY TO ASK THAT QUESTION? UH, THE CHAIR.
COMMISSIONER KAMATH, WOULD YOU'D LIKE TO, UM, ANSWER? YEAH.
UM, I UNDERSTAND WE HAVE A, UH, BUSINESSMAN WANTS TO BUILD HOMES TO SELL FOR THE, UM, BUYERS TO COME AND OCCUPY.
NOW IF THERE IS A SITUATION WHERE WE HAVE A DWELLING, WHERE IS, UH, THERE IS, UH, SOMEBODY LIVES THERE AS A OWNER, THEN IT PUTS A SECOND UNIT IN THE BACK OF THE ADJACENT RUNNING UNIT, AND THAT IS PROBABLY MORE APPROPRIATE.
OR AS A HOME BUILDER, HE CAN BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY, WHICH IS MORE COMPARABLE TO ALL THE R SIXES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I, I DO AGREE THAT, UH, THERE IS A APARTMENT COMPLEX LOOSELY BUILT, AND ALSO THERE ARE SOME, THERE ARE FEW, UH, MOBILE HOMES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE, I THINK IS GETTING CLEANED UP, BUT BRINGING, UH, TWO UNITS ON THIS ONE R SIX LOT RIGHT NOW, UH, ESPECIALLY WITH THE, YOU CAN LOOK AT THE OPPOSITION OF THE PEOPLE WHO OPPOSED ARE TWO NEIGHBORS AND THREE NEIGHBORS IN THE BACK ON THE FILE.
AND THEN YOU HAVE A, UH, LATERAL TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD DIS ASSOCIATION THAT HAS SENT A LETTER IN OPPOSITION.
AND THIS GENTLEMAN OR THE, UH, APPLICANT HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO COMMUNICATE THEM, COMMUNICATE WITH THEM.
SO IN THAT RESPECT, I WANTED TO DENY THIS MOTION FOR TWO DWELLINGS IN THE R SIX VERSUS THE SINGLE OCCUPANCY, UH,
COULD I FOLLOW UP WITH THE QUESTION? YES.
UM, COMMISSIONER KAMATH, ARE YOU, IF IT WAS ONE HOME, BECAUSE EITHER TWO HOMES AT 600 SQUARE FEET, SO ONE HOME WOULD MAYBE MAKE THAT A LARGER, IS IT THE SIZE OF THE HOMES THAT YOU'RE UNHAPPY WITH? OR, OR JUST THAT YOU WANT ONE, YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE ONE SINGLE FAMILY THERE
[00:45:01]
NO MATTER WHAT THE SIZE IS BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNERSHIP EITHER WAY, IF IT WAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME OR THESE TOWN HOMES, IT SOUNDS LIKE IT'S STILL OWNERSHIP AND I THINK ISN'T THE OWNERSHIP OF EITHER THE TOWN HOME OR IF YOU BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, AREN'T THOSE BOTH OF VALUE? I THINK THERE'S A DIFFERENCE WHERE, UH, THE, HERE YOU HAVE A TWO, TWO OWNERS WILL BE THE, UH, OCCU TWO, TWO INDIVIDUAL OWNERS WILL BE OCCUPIED INSTEAD OF, UH, ONE OWNER OCCUPYING A SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING AND POSSIBLY HAVING A A D U.THIS IS KIND OF A, UH, UH, PART OF A MULTI-FAMILY, EXCEPT AS BEING TWO UNITS ON ONE LOT IS WHAT THE NEIGHBORS ARE OPPOSING.
ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.
AND, AND I GUESS MY ISSUE WITH THE MOTION IS RIGHT NOW IT'S R SIX, AS OF RIGHT, IF AN OWNER WERE TO OCCUPY IT, THERE WOULD BE A POSSIBILITY FOR SOMEONE TO RENT A BACK UNIT.
UM, AND SO IN THAT CASE, YOU WOULD'VE A COMBINATION OF OWNERSHIP AND NON OWNERSHIP, BUT WHAT YOU WOULDN'T HAVE IS THIS SITE PLAN FOR TWO UNITS WITH SIX PARKING OFF STREET ALLOWED.
UM, YOU KNOW, AND WHILE I UNDERSTAND THE NEIGHBOR'S CONCERNS, I HAVE TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, A BLOCK AND A HALF FROM MY HOME IS I THINK A SIMILAR DIMENSION LOCK.
AND IT DOESN'T HAVE TWO UNITS ON IT, IT HAS FOUR, AND THEY WERE ALL SOLD.
AND, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE ALL PEOPLE WITH VESTED INTEREST IN THAT COMMUNITY.
SO IN THIS CASE, WHAT I SEE IS, EVEN THOUGH IT'S A ZONING CHANGE TO, YOU KNOW, A CONDITIONAL USE, A SLIGHTLY MORE DENSE ZONING PROVISION, I SEE IT AS PROVIDING SOME BENEFIT.
AND SO IT'S FOR THAT REASON, I FEEL I'M UNLIKELY TO SUPPORT THE MOTION.
UM, ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS WITH, UM, DISCUSSION FOR THE MOTION ON THE, OKAY.
WITH, UH, NO OTHER DISCUSSION, THERE IS CURRENTLY A MOTION ON, UM, THE FLOOR FOR DENIAL BY COMMISSIONER KAMATH WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL.
SO THE FLOOR IS OPEN, IF SO, DESIRED FOR A MOTION TO RECONSIDER OR, UM, OKAY.
MADAM CHAIR, JUST AS A POINT OF INFORMATION, THIS IS THE FIRST SUBSTANTIVE VOTE WE'VE HAD ON THIS STAFF.
AND SO, UM, IF ONE OF THE CONCERNS WERE THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, THE DENIAL WOULD WORK AS A CONTINUANCE AT THIS POINT? CORRECT.
THIS IS ACTUALLY THE SECOND TIME THAT THIS, UH, CASE IS BEING HEARD.
SO, UM, THE APPLICANT COULD PROCEED TO COUNSEL.
UH, IF A MOTION, UH, IS FA HAS FAILED FOR TODAY, THEN IT WOULD, UH, BY DEFAULT FORWARD AS A DENIAL.
IF THERE'S NO MOTION, OKAY, WELL THEN IT MOVES ON TO COUNSEL AS, UM, A DENIAL THEN.
IF THERE'S NO MOTION TO RECONSIDER, IF FOLLOWED BY A NEW MOTION, THEN UH, THE APPLICANT CAN PROCEED TO COUNSEL WITH A MOTION OF DENIAL BY DEFAULT.
[00:50:01]
SO WE'RE READY FOR THE NEXT CASE.[13. 20-5288 ZONING CASE Z-2020-10700189 (Council District 4)]
ITEM NUMBER 13 IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM C TWO TO R FOUR WITH ALL OVERLAYS REMAINING THE SAME.GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 13,000 BLOCK OF WATSON ROAD, THERE WERE SIX NOTICES MAILED.
ONE RECEIVED IN FAVOR, NONE IN OPPOSITION, AND THERE'S NO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION STAFF HAS FOUND EVIDENCE OF LIKELY ADVERSE IMPACTS ON NEIGHBORING LANDS IN RELATION TO THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST.
THE PROPERTY IS NEAR AREAS OF LARGE INDUSTRIAL USES.
THE CURRENT C TWO IS MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
RESIDENTIAL USES IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS CAN HAVE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE.
IS THE APPLICANT, UH, READY TO PRESENT? KEVIN, ARE YOU ON THE LINE? THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE FOR TWO WEEKS TO OCTOBER THE SIXTH.
WE HAVE LOST CONNECTION WITH THEM.
WE CAN TRY TO MAKE ANOTHER CONNECTION IN JUST ONE MOMENT.
I WANTED TO MAKE A JOKE ABOUT HOW LONG THIS MEETING HAS LASTED, BUT, UH,
WHAT IS THAT? IS THAT SUMMER SOMERSET ROAD OR AT THE END OF THIS EXHIBIT? UM, IT'S INTERSECT, INTERSECT SOMERSET.
AND JUST WHILE WE'RE WAITING TO CONNECT THE APPLICANT TO THE LINE OR THE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE LINE, THERE WERE NO, UM, NO LIGHT CALLERS AND NO VOICEMAILS.
DO WE NEED APPLICANT TO MAKE THE MOTION REQUEST FOR THE CONTINUANCE? KEVIN, ARE YOU THERE? YES, YES, I'M OKAY.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION.
THIS IS KEVIN DINDA WITH BROWN AND ORTIZ ONE 12 EAST PECAN STREET REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE APPLICANT.
WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO ENGAGE IN FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF.
UM, COMMISSIONER KAMATH THE, UH, UH, CHAIR, IS THIS FOR DISCUSSION OR FOR A, IF SHE HASN'T ASKED HER TO, UH, I MEAN, IT'S, I GUESS IT'S UP TO YOU.
UH, COMMISSIONER KAMATH, IF YOU'RE READY FOR A MOTION, YOU CAN, OH, SORRY.
THE, UH, UH, QUESTION FOR THE STAFF, UH, WHAT IS THE DISTANCE, UH, FOR, FOR THIS LOT FOR THE, UH, PROPERTY FROM THE TOYOTA MANUFACTURING? UM, IT'S ABOUT FROM THE, FROM THE CORNER PIECE OF IT.
IT'S A LITTLE UNDER THREE MILES FROM, UM, THE PROPERTY LINE OF, UH, THE TOYOTA PLANT.
IS THAT FOR THE ENTIRE LOT OR IS IT PART OF THE LOT? UM, SO IF I WERE TO TAKE A MEASUREMENT OF THREE MILES FROM IT WOULD PROBABLY BE, UH, SOMEWHERE TOWARDS THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY.
UM, UH, I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, MOVE, UH, FOR THE RECOMMENDATION FOR, FOR CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO,
[00:55:01]
UH, OCTOBER THE SIXTH HEARING.WE HAVE A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.
ANY, UH, COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? I, I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION SO I CAN PREPARE FOR NEXT TIME.
SO AS I'M LOOKING AT THE GOOGLE, UH, SHOT HERE, UM, IF THAT, UM, I KNOW IT'S OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS, BUT ARE THOSE HOMES, UM, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S HOMES ON, ON AT LEAST THREE OR THREE OF THE CORNERS, IF NOT MORE.
HOW MANY CORNERS IS THAT? 1, 2, 3, 4, ACTUALLY.
SO, UM, AND I GUESS IT, IT'S HARD FOR ME TO KIND OF TELL, OR IS THAT A LOT OF RESIDENTS AROUND THERE, EVEN THOUGH IT'S OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS, IT, IT, IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THOSE ARE LARGE LOTS, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES MM-HMM.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? OKAY.
ALL RIGHT, SO THAT IS THE LAST CASE, CORRECT? STAFF? THAT'S CORRECT.
[15. 20-5415 Consideration and Approval of the September 1, 2020 Meeting Minutes]
ANY CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES? OKAY.UM, DO I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL? MADAM CHAIR, COMMISSIONER.
MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AS SUBMITTED.
UH, MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AS SUBMITTED BY COMMISSIONER BUSANTE.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCDANIEL.
IS THERE AN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT? NO, MA'AM.
WELL, HEY EVERYBODY, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
CAN, WE CAN NEVER TELL YOU THANK YOU SO ENOUGH FOR YOUR SERVICE.
SO I'M GONNA TELL YOU THANK YOU EVERY SINGLE TIME.
UM, I WISH EVERYBODY A PRODUCTIVE, PEACEFUL, POSITIVE WEEK.
IT IS, UH, 2 0 6 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.